Not trying to make things up or cover for the ASI Foundation. I am just voicing my reasoning behind the silence around the burn and what I believe is the reason only 5M has been burnt so far. Personally I bought back in slightly after the 35M burn announcement and while it's a shame this has not been the case, it simply means to me that the revenue generated just wasn't enough to warrant extra burns.
Читать полностью…
It's getting quite repetitive.
Burn = enough revenue generated by the ASI Foundation to return to the token holders. If not enough revenue is generated, or they need all revenue for growth, then burn is delayed.
Hello iam Aswanth
Iam new to here
I wanna learn AI
There will be no FET to SFI as they are two diffrent tokens for diffrent purposes. You mean FET to ASI.
I suppose once the ASI_Alliance has it's own AI to AI Blockchain, that allow not just fast transactions but also fast AI to AI communication in a way they are compatible to each other's
Hey, AGIX and OCEAN on Binance were already merged into FET. that's all that needs to be done.
Читать полностью…
Hello everyone. I wanted to ask if the FET token will be automatically replaced or if it’s necessary to manually swap from FET to SFI.
Читать полностью…
We might partner, it is not the same token. I get you are trying to pump your bag, but its not the place.
Читать полностью…
SFI is another coin, but belongs to ASI ecosystem
Читать полностью…
sfi & fet (asi) its different coin?
l thought its a same coin
SFI belongs to the ASI ecosystem
Читать полностью…
Yes, naturally.
No scalable use case has such direct interactions with a database.
Interesting thought posted by Near Protocol. Next extension of that question might be something like, which agent will be chosen for choosing a chain?
How will we choose agents in 5 years?
I think Ben Goertzel's preferred vision is to keep merging with crypto ai projects until we are an open source centralized-but-decentralized behemoth that is vastly larger than any one big tech company. The project tried to convince us that the indirect dilution via merger was just a figment of our imagination.
At first I was totally against the idea of another merger, but then when just days after the community voted no, paal announced a partnership with IBM, i have to admit, i felt like paal merger would have been a good idea.
But, now, seeing that paal is down just as much as we are during the past year (or more), I am more confident in the community's collective decision to vote against the merger. They would not have lifted us and we would not have lifted them. We and they would have experienced value loss whether we partnered or mergered - (i still don't understand why we have not at least announced a partnership with paal)
But, still, we currently have a lot of complaints about the asi chatbot functionality, and perhaps paal being fully aligned with ASI and perhaps working directly on the chatbot end user interface, there would have been real synergy and a better end-user experience with the chatbot? I dunno.
Can we (ai crypto projects) compete better with big tech if we all join forces and become one? Or, at least join forces in terms of tokenimic alignment?
I think the debate is dilution + less friction in collaboration + alignment + strength in numbers vs. no dilution + more friction in collaboration + less alignment + less strength in numbers.
However, considering both aspects of our niche, ai and crypto, i think partnering is the best way to go for maximum community satisfaction. And perhaps community satisfaction is the most important factor for the project to consider, since ASI Alliance brands themself has a community focused project.
I even released my infographics back then with 35M burn in mind and thinking it was a very optimistic number. I'm updating this infographic as we speak and will release it soon.
Читать полностью…
You’re just making things up. They burned 5M in January. They estimated it would be 35M total the first year. That would assume an increase every quarter, and not a 100% drop from the first to second quarter. They said the second burn would be in April. They’ve lied to the community and decided it would be easier to deal with everyone thinking they’re lying and defrauding the token holders, than to just come out and say why it was missed and when they will continue. This should be a red flag for anyone who can think objectively about the project.
Читать полностью…
RE ‘selective communities’ - It’s not that deep. 🙂
It’s been important to get to know the history of where we’ve been so we can write where we’re going. Remember, we’re retrofitting Marketing/Comms to some things already in-flight.
RE ASI Chain, we’ve built a comprehensive GTM Comms plan, with the first piece of content coming 🔜 (kidding, but this week).
Quietly confident that all are going to like seeing the step-change, but let’s see!
If Ben and Humayun are sharing this exact info on ad-hoc Spaces calls why is this not released yet to the broader community to streamline communications vs making information available for selective communities only? @DTaylor
Читать полностью…
Subject: Inquiry Regarding FET to ASI Conversion on Binance
Dear Team,
I hope this message finds you well.
I am a holder of FET (Fetch.ai) tokens on Binance, and I recently read about the upcoming merger between Fetch.ai, Ocean Protocol, and SingularityNET to form a new unified token called ASI (Artificial Superintelligence Token).
I would like to ask:
Will my FET balance on Binance be automatically converted to ASI once the merger is implemented?
Will the ASI token be listed directly on Binance?
And if not, are there any actions required from me to manually convert or withdraw my tokens to an external wallet?
I would appreciate your clarification on this matter. Thank you for your support and continuous efforts.
https://x.com/SecretNetwork/status/1947451542057193890?t=d-1K6qMs5mLGUXtzdn5rVA&s=19
Читать полностью…
Please soft chill in SFI chat.
Читать полностью…
That's what the application layer is for.
Читать полностью…
We will have our own blockchain for ai.
Читать полностью…
Decentralised is a must when it comes to ownership and control of data.
Basing this off Decentralised Identifiers and Verifiable Credentials with cheqd's infrastructure is absolutely necessary.
Web3 cant exist at true web2 scale without Decentralised trust chains - and, you dont want google/ FAANGS controlling all that infrastructure (again)
That's the point of all this, and any use case.
You need trusted data markets that are Verifiable in source or authenticity.
NGOC HUNG HOANG has been banned! Reason: CAS ban.
Читать полностью…
