Bitcoin Dev

28 June 2023 13:20

I’m looking for C++ software engineers familiar with the Blockstream Elements codebase and with Bitcoin Sidechains in general. Who’s interested please DM me

Bitcoin Dev

26 June 2023 09:02

Does anyone know a way how one can recover tether funds if one has send to a wrong dust address ?

Bitcoin Dev

24 June 2023 02:10

etf presents no new risk compared to exchanges

Bitcoin Dev

24 June 2023 00:59

Thats why warren invests indirectly in crypto banks in brazil

Bitcoin Dev

24 June 2023 00:29

are they really new found members of the community if they're buying ETF shares? lol

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 15:55

thats not your problem tho, is it

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 15:52

BlackRock ETF Drawbacks - risk of eventual fractional reserve Bitcoin holdings - BlackRock pushes ESG & other woke / socialist stupidity - they are active investors who are used to control - increases odds of a fork or code war or attempt to influence Benefits - massive AUM of $10T, 5% of BlackRock’s AUM = the market cap of all Bitcoin - institutional influence & distribution - opens door for other competitors

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 15:46

Yes everyone can join, but in the ishares trust spot etf there is a part that says they decide where they will stay in an event of a fork and which network they ll follow

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 15:24

there is no reason to belive this

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 10:56

Roger/Jihan shit on a higher lvl

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 10:00

so the men the myth the legend himself

Bitcoin Dev

13 June 2023 15:07

Hi everyone, I am compiling my Bitcoin Core myself but I cannot compile version v25.0 version v24.1 compiles fine but with version 25 I am getting this error:

In file included from ipc/capnp/protocol.cpp:8:
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:25:52: error: expected type-specifier before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
   25 |     template<typename S> static auto get(S&& s) -> AUTO_RETURN(s.getThreadMap())
      |                                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:25:52: error: expected initializer before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:28:78: error: expected type-specifier before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
   28 |     template<typename S, typename... A> static auto init(S&& s, A&&... a) -> AUTO_RETURN(s.initThreadMap(std::forward<A>(a)...))
      |                                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:28:78: error: expected initializer before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:36:52: error: expected type-specifier before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
   36 |     template<typename S> static auto get(S&& s) -> AUTO_RETURN(s.getContext())
      |                                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:36:52: error: expected initializer before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:39:78: error: expected type-specifier before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
   39 |     template<typename S, typename... A> static auto init(S&& s, A&&... a) -> AUTO_RETURN(s.initContext(std::forward<A>(a)...))
      |                                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:39:78: error: expected initializer before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:47:52: error: expected type-specifier before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
   47 |     template<typename S> static auto get(S&& s) -> AUTO_RETURN(s.getResult())
      |                                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:47:52: error: expected initializer before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:50:78: error: expected type-specifier before ‘AUTO_RETURN’
   50 |     template<typename S, typename... A> static auto init(S&& s, A&&... a) -> AUTO_RETURN(s.initResult(std::forward<A>(a)...))
      |                                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~
./ipc/capnp/init.capnp.proxy.h:50:78: error: expected initializer before ‘AUTO_RETURN

./autogen.sh

make -C depends NO_QT=1 NO_WALLET=1 MULTIPROCESS=1 -j 8

export CONFIG_SITE=/data/bitcoin/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/share/config.site

./configure CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS" --disable-wallet --disable-bench --without-gui --without-miniupnpc --without-natpmp --enable-multiprocess

make -j 8

sudo make install

Bitcoin Dev

23 May 2023 17:23

so maybe it wouldn't fit without sacrificing another app

Bitcoin Dev

23 May 2023 17:20

i don't think thats the reason they limit the functionality to nanox

Bitcoin Dev

23 May 2023 17:13

they were attacked for it quite profusely (and i defended them that its fine)

Bitcoin Dev

26 June 2023 09:03

From exchange to a private wallet? But instead to the real address sended to the dust address sort of like being target to a clipboard attack or something of that nature.

Bitcoin Dev

24 June 2023 02:11

and we (hopefully) don't run around sounding alarms about exchanges every day, just general reluctance and education towards people with enough bitcoin to avoid them

Bitcoin Dev

24 June 2023 02:09

to me thats overextending; not your keys not your bitcoin is long known, we should protecting people with the keys

Bitcoin Dev

24 June 2023 00:58

Yes they are new and they are dinosour investors like charlie and warren who are scared and dont understand new things go thru their friends on wall street to make more fiat profit they dont give a shit about btc

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 16:06

Its not my problem, but it can be a problem to a newly found members of the community that can easily be misinformed or manipulated by rogue agents

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 15:54

and thats fair, thats how governance is eventually done, by people selling one side and buying another

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 15:46

So just like roger and jihan they may try to hyperinflate with btc paper so they can scam ppl

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 15:24

as a holder, transactor, everyone can join

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 11:19

keep calm and carry on stacking

Bitcoin Dev

22 June 2023 10:55

Perspective

BlackRock’s goal is to fork Bitcoin and steal your assets.

Bitcoin Dev

19 June 2023 20:26

@oriolpont
Please help and delte this

Is this @ adam3us actually the real adam back ?

Bitcoin Dev

25 May 2023 07:38

https://pca.st/episode/f0334aaa-0363-43b2-b51e-a4f5c6eb44f4

Bitcoin Dev

23 May 2023 17:22

its probably planned obsolescence + a fact nano could really use more space

Bitcoin Dev

23 May 2023 17:19

I don't have a nanoX and I ignore the implementation details, but do notice that the implementation leverages capabilities that are only in the nanoX secure chip but not in the nanoS one. Maybe the web packets are forwarded encrypted already from the secure chip, and opensource has no way to know if what's being transmitted is only a shard instead of the whole seed.

Bitcoin Dev

23 May 2023 17:13

this is why trezor was refusing to use it, so they can stay fully open