𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

15 May 2025 21:54

Breaking: Can Supreme Court Fix Timelines For President To Decide Bills Reserved By Governor? President Refers 14 Questions To SC Under Article 143
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/president-reference-supreme-court-fix-timelines-for-president-bills-reserved-governor-article-143-292229

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 20:13

Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS): A Redundant Provision

1. Introduction to Section 69 BNS

* Introduced in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
* Criminalizes sexual intercourse based on a false promise of marriage.
* Punishment: Imprisonment up to 10 years + fine.
* Such an offence was not separately defined under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

2. Core Legal Argument: Redundancy of Section 69

* Definitions of rape (Section 63 BNS) and consent (Section 28 BNS) are unchanged from IPC.
* False promise of marriage is already treated as "consent obtained under a misconception of fact" — a ground that vitiates consent under Section 28 BNS.
* Therefore, such acts already fall under the definition of rape, making Section 69 legally duplicative and unnecessary.

3. Judicial Precedents Limiting Scope

* Courts have narrowed interpretation of false promise of marriage cases:

1. Anurag Soni v. The State of Chhattisgarh (2019):

* Rape charge valid only if the accused never intended to marry from the beginning.
* If intention was genuine but later changed, it does not constitute rape.

2. Rajnish Singh @ Soni v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025):

* Complainant was in a 15-year consensual relationship, portrayed herself as wife.
* FIR quashed; held as no deceit or misconception.

3. Abhishek Arjariya v. The State of Madhya Pradesh (2025):

* Prosecutrix was already married; her consent based on false promise of marriage not protected under "misconception of fact".
* FIR and proceedings quashed.

4. Legal and Constitutional Issues

* Section 69 lacks:

* A non-obstante clause, which would have given it overriding effect.
* An exception clause in Section 63 to exclude such cases from rape.
* Potential violation of Article 14 (equality before law) due to arbitrary classification and unequal treatment of similar offences.

5. Practical Implication for Law Enforcement

* Courts are quashing such cases based on well-established precedents.
* Recommendation: Police should conduct preliminary inquiry to assess presence of a cognisable offence.
* Avoid filing charge-sheets in weak or consensual cases to prevent misuse of law and reduce judicial backlog.

@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 19:07

https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/section-69-of-the-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-is-redundant/article69478060.ece

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 19:05

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/know-the-law-when-can-sex-on-promise-to-marry-amount-to-offence-of-rape-276834

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 19:01

The curious difference between IPC and BNS on rape
https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2024/Sep/09/the-curious-difference-between-ipc-and-bns-on-rape

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 15:50

Sun tzu art of war explained.

The idea of avoiding war lies in preventing potential losses. If war is inevitable, says Chinese general Sun Tzu, the attempt should be to overwhelm the enemy quickly, with a thorough assessment of their strengths and weaknesses.

@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 13:19

THE TERRITORIAL ARMY ACT, 1948

Article 23

Registration as Territorial army men
https://territorialarmy.in/page/3

I was trying to find such a thing from so many days, finally 🤩

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 09:32

Sajjan Singh v State of Rajasthan 1965

Seeds of Basic structure doctrine by justice hidayatullah and justice mudholkar (judgment was concurring)

Page 34 of PDF for Pakistan Court reference.

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 08:48

'Systematic Attempt To Mint More Money': Gujarat HC Denies Bail To Doctor Accused Of Performing Forced Angioplasties To Claim Govt Funds
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/gujarat-high-court/gujarat-high-court-denies-bail-cardiologist-performing-unnecessary-angioplasties-291801

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 23:07

Amrit Yadav v. Jharkhand 2025

Position of law is settled that though there is no fundamental right to claim reservation as Articles 16(4) and (4-A) of the Constitution of India are in the nature of enabling provisions only and do not mandate the State or its instrumentalities to
provide reservation in every selection process but inspite thereof, the State’s decision to not provide reservation has to be based on some quantifiable data and valid reasoning.

Read More on this topic.

But don't you think equal protection of law is a Fundamental Right which says equals blmust be treated equally and unequals unequally???

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 21:10

"While we are not entertaining the present writ petition, we make it clear that any attempt to spread communal hatred or indulge in hate speech must be dealt with an iron hand. Hate speech cannot be tolerated as it leads to loss of dignity and self-worth of the targeted group members, contributes to disharmony amongst groups, and erodes tolerance and open-mindedness, which is a must for a multi-cultural society committed to the idea of equality. Any attempt to cause alienation or humiliation of the targeted group is a criminal offence and must be dealt with accordingly."

Note: Imran pratapgadhi v. Gujarat says there should a preliminary inquiry w/o registering FIR if there is any offence related to freedom of speech.

@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 13:34

⏳🚀 LEGAL CURRENT AFFAIRS BY NATURAL JUSTICE TEAM

Today, 9th may 2025, we have completed 3 years of service to the needy and willing law students on this platform.

I have decided that once (in future) I leave this platform we will not delete the channel rather transfer its ownership to a better than me owner.

I have seen many selections and learnings of my friends and learnt a lot from them.

I have seen the growth not in numbers but in engagement, and I wanted this only a good responsive audience with whom we can have legal discourse.

Gone are the days of PDF circulation today is the time for Quality, connectivity, relevancy with minimal amount of information.

@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 12:49

Courts Must Always Remain Open To Public Debate & Criticism; Even Subjudice Issues Can Be Debated By People & Press : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/courts-must-always-remain-open-to-public-debate-criticism-even-subjudice-issues-can-be-debated-by-people-press-supreme-court-291750

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 11:19

Supreme Court Considers Plea To Replace 5-Year Law Degree Course With 4-Year LL.B
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-considers-plea-to-replace-5-year-law-degree-course-with-4-year-llb-291709

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

08 May 2025 21:51

Complete Procedure Summarised. Including FIR

In house inquiry landmark case
Ravichandran Iyer v. Justice A.M. Bhattacharjee
In house inquiry latest case:
Additional District And Sessions v Registrar General, High Court Of Madhya 2015


1. Complaint to CJI
2. Prima facie case.
3. Consult CJ of that HC.
4. Report of CJ
5. Committee formation.
6. Committee Report.
7. Commitee
a. no charge.
b. slight charge
c. grave charge.
8. CJI either asks for
a. no removal
b. reprimand.
c. resign voluntarily.
9. If no VRS then CJI reports to President.
10. Now judges inquiry Act and Article 124 and 217 comes into play.
11. Here 50/100 members RS or LS and committee consisting of CJI CJ and jurist then opportunity of being heard and then 50% + 1 of total of both houses and 2/3rd of present and voting.

Removal of judge complete. ✅


What about FIR?
Judges are public servant hence president sanction required but consultation of CJI is must and binding upon president.

@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 20:47

‘Not dead but sleeping’: Expanding international law to better regulate the diverse effects of ceasefire agreements

Hugo Grotius ~ When a ceasefire is signed the legal state of war is ‘not dead but sleeping’.

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 19:07

Hopefully would be summarising these articles soon and make the law clear to you.

@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 19:05

https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-pil-challenge-section-69-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-false-promise-to-marry-rape-269058

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 19:02

Promises, Prejudices and Perils: Unveiling the Complexities of Section 69, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - NLIU Law Review
https://nliulawreview.nliu.ac.in/blog/promises-prejudices-and-perils-unveiling-the-complexities-of-section-69-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-2023/

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 16:58

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

Explain how Article 14, 19 and 21 is interwoven in one thread.

8 Marks, maximum 14 mins time.

Share 👇

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 14:34

🇮🇳-🇵🇰 Ceasefire Agreed, W.E.F. Today 5 PM.

@CurrentLegalGK https://www.youtube.com/live/fqNj3FErqTA?feature=shared

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 11:16

Most commonly used IPC and BNS provisions.

#Internship@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

10 May 2025 08:49

Huge scams are going on behalf of patient and especially doctor with Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY)

Playing with resources of legit and needy patients who have Right to health U/A 21

@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 23:27

Pakistan or Partition of India Ambedkar

#Book@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 21:56

India’s Abstention in IMF Vote on Pakistan Loan: Explained

Decision-Making at the IMF

▶️The IMF Executive Board consists of 25 Directors who represent member countries or groups of countries. It handles daily operational matters, including loan approvals.

▶️Unlike in the United Nations, where each country has one vote, IMF voting power reflects the economic size of each member. For instance, countries like the United States hold a disproportionately high voting share. Thus to simplify things, The IMF typically makes decisions by consensus.

▶️In cases where a vote is required, the system does not allow a formal "no" vote. Directors can either vote in favor or abstain. There is no provision to vote against a loan or proposal.

Why India Abstained

▶️India abstained from the recent IMF vote on approving a loan to Pakistan not due to a lack of opposition, but because IMF rules do not permit a formal “no” vote.

▶️By abstaining, India conveyed its strong dissent within the constraints of the IMF’s voting system and used the opportunity to formally record its objections.
India’s key objections included:

▶️India questioned the effectiveness of ongoing IMF assistance, noting that Pakistan has received support in 28 of the past 35 years including four programs in just the last five without meaningful or lasting reform.

▶️India strongly highlighted the Pakistani military’s continued dominance in economic affairs, which undermines transparency, civilian oversight, and sustainable reform.

▶️India firmly opposed providing funds to a country that continues to sponsor cross-border terrorism, warning that such support carries reputational risks for global institutions and undermines international norms.

So PLEASE learn some basic facts before jumping on Headline on TV and headless social media experts.

@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 21:10

Attempts To Spread Communal Hatred & Indulge In Hate Speech Must Be Dealt With Iron Hand : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/attempts-to-spread-communal-hatred-indulge-in-hate-speech-must-be-dealt-with-iron-hand-supreme-court-291648

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 12:49

Big Statement.


Justice Bhuyan observed :
"Courts, as a public and open institution, must always remain open to public observations, debates and criticisms. Infact, courts should welcome debates and constructive criticism. Every important issue needs to be vigorously debated by the people and the press, even if the issue of debate is subjudice before a court


Wikimedia Foundation Inc. v. ANI Media Private Limited, 2025

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

09 May 2025 11:36

'Child Adoption Leave' A Fundamental Right Of Adoptive Mothers Under Article 21: Chhattisgarh High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/chattisgarh-high-court/chhattisgarh-high-court-rules-child-adoption-leave-fundamental-right-article-21-constitution-291580

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

08 May 2025 22:47

Reliance, Delhi lawyer among those in the race for Operation Sindoor trademark
https://www.barandbench.com/news/reliance-delhi-lawyer-among-those-in-the-race-for-operation-sindoor-trademark

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

08 May 2025 21:38

Why CJI Sanjiv Khanna Sent Inquiry Report On Justice Yashwant Varma To President & PM - Understanding In-House Procedure
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/why-cji-sanjiv-khanna-sent-inquiry-report-on-justice-yashwant-varma-to-president-pm-understanding-in-house-procedure-291675