π²Contact β> @CurrentLegalGKBOT π¨ββοΈ Setting Precedents: Relevancy and Reinvigoration. You will get awesome legal issues answered, occasional tips on skills, case briefs, and latest laws explained. π§ For Daily Quiz β> @LegalQuizzes β³πEnjoy_Learning
Kafka Meets Code: A Law And Economic Analysis Of AI In Litigation And Justice Delivery
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/kafka-meets-code-law-economic-analysis-ai-litigation-justice-delivery-293999
Yearly Digest 2024 MP High Court.
ILR journal
@CurrentLegalGK
βοΈ Landmark Judgments on Juvenile Justice POCSO, MTP, Child Marriage and Child labour.
https://mphc.gov.in/jjc/important-judgments
Santosh Kumar Aggarwal
v.
Orissa High Court, Cuttack
2024
Case related to application of Guidelines for complaints against judicial officer.
Complaint of judicial officer to particular Registrar of concerned High Court or to CPGRAM portal.
#BeingJudge@CurrentLegalGK
No Temporary Injunction Can Be Granted In Appeal Against Rejection Of Plaint : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/no-temporary-injunction-can-be-granted-in-appeal-against-rejection-of-plaint-supreme-court-293967
what is this LLC?
comment π
@CurrentLegalGK
The majority opinion authored by Justice DY Chandrachud in Puttaswamy lays down the legitimate interest test whereby to intervene with a person's privacy, the first prong of the test says there must be a law. The requirement of a 'law' is also an explicit condition of Article 21 (from which the right to be forgotten vis-Γ -vis privacy emerges) to restrict the right. Without any law in operation, constitutionally, there cannot be any intervention with the right. The second arm of the test states that there must be a legitimate aim or legitimate object if the state wants to enact a law. The state may have particular objectives to intervene with the said right, but such objectives must be legitimate, non-arbitrary, and reasonable. Lastly, the legitimate aim of the state and the means adopted to fulfil those objectives must be proportionate with the right to privacy. The extent of intervention with the right to privacy must not dilute the right from its existence. Unrestricted intervention violates a person's right to be forgotten and the right to be left alone.
@CurrentLegalGK
So those who were asking that what will happen to state amendments in CrPC, IEA, IPC, though the answer was already mentioned last year itself, but still you have a judgment which says state amendments are impliedly repealed by enactment of new criminal laws.
Because the main enactment is repealed then why state amendments which are there in main enactment will still be in enforce it is impossible, right?
Even if presidential assent was taken for state amendment
Essential Elements Of Valid Legal Notice : Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/essential-elements-of-valid-legal-notice-supreme-court-explains-293889
In Acquittal Due To Compromise/Hostile Witness, Unjustified For Authorities To Put Honourable Acquittal Test In False Cases: Madhya Pradesh HC
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court-ruling-honourable-acquittal-compromise-between-parties-and-hostile-witnesses-case-276340
The Horizons Of Privacy And The Right To Be Forgotten
https://www.livelaw.in/columns/constitution-of-india-aadhar-case-right-to-privacy-183144
https://youtube.com/shorts/uDgsQmQEVSI?si=cxHByUEiDlvKFVdS
GOOD QUESTION.
Form your personal opinion on this regarding what is right in consideration to the present situation of the country as per your understanding.
Will the nation's growth be hindered or nurtured by appointing the Leader of the Opposition to the said post? Comment. β
Motion should not revive discussion on a matter that has been discussed in the same session. The Motion needs the support of at least 50 members to be admitted. Rajya Sabha is not permitted to make use of this device.It is introduced to draw the attention of the house to a definite matter of urgent public importance.
Which type of motion is being discussed in
the above context?
(a) Privilege motion
(b) Calling attention motion
(c) Adjournment motion
(d) Dilatory motion
#Constitution @CurrentLegalGK
Preliminary questions must be asked by the Court to ascertain whether the witness is able to understand the questions and answer the same.
The Trial Court has not followed the condition precedent before examining a minor witness. Before administering oath, the learned Trial Judge did not satisfy himself that the witness understood the importance of the oath.
@CurrentLegalGK
Testimony of An Accomplice β Any Shift in the BSA?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/accomplice-testimony-admissibility-section-133-evidence-act-vs-section-138-bharatiya-sakshya-adhiniyam-293694
π¬οΈπ¬ Check your lungs health in one minute
:
31st May, On Anti Tobacco Day, know why Jahangir had banned smoking, more deaths due to passive smoking than murders
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/XuWUhqEZMTb
K. Ramakrishnan v. State of Kerala
1999
~Justice K. Narayana Kurup
Smoking in any form in Public violates Article 21
POCSO 10 years Report.
Page 50 onwards landmark judgments on POCSO which must be read anyhow.
MP HIGH COURT 2024 LANDMARK JUDGMENTS
Joti Journal
@CurrentLegalGK
Laws governing services of Judicial Officers and Protection to judges.
Summary: https://ijtr.nic.in/webjournal/11.htm
#BeingJudge@CurrentLegalGK
Failure To Prove Motive Not Fatal To Prosecution Case Based On Circumstantial Evidence : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/failure-to-prove-motive-not-fatal-to-prosecution-case-based-on-circumstantial-evidence-supreme-court-293945
POSH Act : States/UTs File Affidavits In Supreme Court Regarding Compliance With Directions To Form LCC, District Officers Etc
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/posh-act-statesuts-file-affidavits-in-supreme-court-regarding-compliance-with-directions-293951
β‘ Important for Practicing advocates
Essentials of a Valid Legal Notice
a. It should contain a clear and concise set of facts which convey the information leading to the relevant circumstances. This element is also fulfilled when reference is made to any earlier communications issued between the concerned parties;
b. It should convey the intimation of any impending legal obligation or breach committed by any party;
c. It should convey the intention of the party issuing the communication to hold the other party liable to appropriate legal action or charge; and
d. The communication in toto must be unambiguous and should not mislead or suppress material information. If issued under a Statute, it must comply with the relevant requirements prescribed therein as well.β
@CurrentLegalGK
'CrPC (UP Amendment) Act 2018' Containing Restrictions On Grant Of Anticipatory Bail Stands Impliedly Repealed By BNSS: Allahabad HC
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-bnss-repealed-crpc-up-amendment-act-2018-restrictions-grant-anticipatory-bail-293890
Read with earlier judgments
/channel/CurrentLegalGK/3631
1. Hostile witness, whether honourable acquittal?
2. Benefit of doubt mentioned in judgment, whether honourable acquittal?
'Grey Area Exists In Cryptocurrency Regulation; Existing Laws Obsolete' : Supreme Court In Bitcoin Extortion Case
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-calls-for-regulation-of-cryptocurrency-says-existing-laws-obsolete-cannot-address-issues-293855
Personality Rights: Interpretation And Scope
https://www.livelaw.in/columns/personality-rights-amitabh-bachchan-protection-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-217539
#Quote@CurrentLegalGK
"You have power over your mindβnot outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.β
β Marcus Aurelius
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
Ram,accused of an offence of murder stated before a police officer that, "The knife by which I have killed Sohan has been hidden by me in the field, which I can show." On this information the police officer discovers the said knife from the field, on which human blood is detected.
Is the whole statement given by the accused admissible in evidence? If not, what part or parts are admissible in evidence? Give reasons clearly. (15 marks)
1. The testimony of one accomplice cannot be, ordinarily, be supported by the testimony of another approver. β¦.. In other words, in the common run of cases,
2. the rule of prudence which has evolved into a principle of law is that an accomplice, to be believed, he must be corroborated in material particulars of his testimony.
3. The evidence which is used to corroborate an accomplice need not be a direct evidence and can be in the form of circumstantial evidenceβ.
Somasundaram @ Somu
v.
State
2020
#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
Legal Landscape Of Cosmetic And Reconstructive Surgeries
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/law-regulating-cosmetic-and-reconstructive-surgeries-in-india-analysis-293738