-
Husband, father, founder of @marcopolousa research group, & Trvmp WH staff | https://linktr.ee/garrettz
Word for Word: Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) Accused FBI Agent Peter Strzok of Lying (C-SPAN)
This material may be protected by copyright (more details). If this material infringes your rights, please report: info.savemedia@gmail.com
Glad to help!
Yours, @SaveMedia_bot ❤️
Colorado's private, often secret justice system exclusively for the wealthy
For nearly two decades Colorado has quietly maintained two judicial systems: One that the public makes use of regularly, and the other a lesser known, almost secret variety relied on by the rich, famous and well-to-do.
Specifically for civil cases — the criminal justice system is unaffected — the systems, on paper, are designed to be virtually identical and indiscernible.
For the most part they are, except for a few key critical differences: One of them allows for the litigants to hire and pay for their own private judge, a retired jurist who earns tens of thousands more dollars than they ever could when their full-time job was on the public bench.
And the cases that end up before a private judge nearly always are conducted off the grid, far from public eyes or scrutiny, ensuring a level of secrecy not afforded to those without the means to pay for it.
A four-month Denver Gazette investigation into the last six years of the state’s appointed judge program, as it is known, found a system that is exclusively used by Colorado’s wealthiest residents to do one thing and to do it privately: get divorced.
What has resulted is a two-tier system of justice, in which those with money and affluence can get faster, more specialized attention, while the vast majority of others are reliant on one that is generally slower and more cumbersome.
Said one lawyer who frequently steers affluent clients to the private judge system: “It’s the difference between staying at the Ritz Carton and the Holiday Inn.”
https://denvergazette.com/colorado-watch/colorado-private-judges-divorce-domestic-cases/article_49a53f8a-0dd0-42d1-856b-624e11074cae.html
This interview is worth 3 undergrad credits in sociology
Читать полностью…
Mike Tyson - "I broke my back ... Spinal" HD Interviewclip
Читать полностью…
Really good optics.
I know nothing abt the dad.
https://x.com/aaron_reitz/status/1906804071396151366/photo/1
Now we’re talking.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1906583284458434682
A stay applicant must show that it will be irreparably harmed absent a stay.216
Here, the Government contends that the President suffers irreversible harm each day the district courts’ injunctions remain in effect because he is deprived of the constitutional authority vested in him alone. I agree.
Article II vests the President with the “entire ‘executive Power,’” which “generally includes the ability to remove executive officials.”217 The district courts’ orders effectively nullify that power. That level of interference is “virtually unheard of,” and “it impinges on the ‘conclusive and preclusive’ power through which the President controls the Executive Branch that he is responsible for supervising.”218 If the President “loses confidence in the intelligence, ability, judgment, or loyalty of any one of [his subordinates], he must have the power to remove him without delay.”219
To be clear, this is not an abstract constitutional injury; it is a serious, concrete harm. Each year, the NLRB oversees tens of thousands of unfair labor practice charges and decides (on average) roughly 200 cases.220 Additionally, the NLRB lacks a quorum without Wilcox, meaning the district court’s order tips the scales in favor of political appointees that do not share the President’s policy objectives. The President’s removal power, properly understood, avoids that result.221
Staying these cases pending appeal is in the public interest. The people elected the President, not Harris or Wilcox, to execute the nation’s laws.235
The forcible reinstatement of a presidentially removed principal officer disenfranchises voters by hampering the President’s ability to govern during the four short years the people have assigned him the solemn duty of leading the executive branch.236
Second, the Framers decided to check the President’s uniquely concentrated power by making him “the most democratic and politically accountable official in Government.” Seila Law, 591 U.S. at 224. That accountability is “enhanced by the solitary nature of the Executive Branch, which provides ‘a single object for the jealousy and watchfulness of the people.’” Id. (quoting The Federalist No. 70 (A. Hamilton)). Accordingly, the President “cannot delegate ultimate responsibility or the active obligation to supervise that goes with it . . . .” Id. (quoting Free Enter. Fund, 561 U.S. at 496–97). Without the power to remove principal officers, “the President could not be held fully accountable for discharging his own responsibilities; the buck would stop somewhere else.” Free Enter. Fund, 561 U.S. at 514. That the buck would stop with members of a board rather than a solitary agency head obstructing his agenda does not eliminate his injury."
Читать полностью…
I am so passionate about this appellate decision. It is beautiful. I might do a video on it
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.41769/gov.uscourts.cadc.41769.01208724995.0_1.pdf
🇬🇧UK companies with hidden ownership
Worldwide interactive map of 65,000 UK companies that unlawfully hiding their beneficial owner (with detailed information about each company and displaying the links between companies).
https://taxpolicy.org.uk/wp-content/assets/pscs_map_v3.html
Creator x.com/DanNeidle
"Al Sharpton developed Racism into an Industrialized Racket - the model for the DEI Shakedown. Jasmine Crockett acts like she now has the Al Sharpton Memorial Chair."
https://colonelretjohn.substack.com/p/is-jasmine-crockett-d-tx-30-the-new
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/movawxboava/2025.02.12-OUT-Durbin-530D.pdf
Читать полностью…
If you don't "get" this, we have a different sense of humor
Читать полностью…
Top 20 under 30 Alumni Award
6/25/21
Hotel du Pont, Wilmington DE
Might wanna buy today: /channel/CoingraphNews/13595
Читать полностью…
Even the Congo knows https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoPWMkrKDkA
Читать полностью…
Yes, we have irreparable harm each day a crook, appointed by the biggest crook of all (Joe Biden/Barack Obama), stays in Government.
Читать полностью…
The assertion of a “statutory right” is, of course, entangled with the merits because a statutory right exists only if the statute is constitutional. I’ve explained why the removal provisions here are likely not constitutional. And I assume that Wilcox and Harris each took an oath to “support and defend the Constitution.”228 So I’m not convinced that their removals inflict any irreparable harm.
Читать полностью…
The footnotes in the majority opinion are a treasure, as well.
Читать полностью…
But watch my friend Robert’s video on it first
https://youtu.be/aGt4XjjU34E
Watching Pooh before church. So handsome and goofy
Читать полностью…
Yesterday it was unveiled Aubrey Cottle a/k/a Kirtaner had been arrested by United States Federal Bureau of Investigation in conjunction with the Ontario Provincial Police for the 2021 compromise of the United States Texas Republican Party.
Mr. Cottle is best known within the information security sphere as being a 'founding member' of the "Anonymous" political hacktivist movement in the 2000's.
Mr. Cottle is alleged to be involved in the compromise of Hal Turner (2008) and the Church of Scientology (2008).
Federal documents state Mr. Cottle gained unauthorized access to a 3rd party hosting side for the United States Texas Republican Party. Subsequently, he allegedly exfiltrated data, made is downloadable for others, and defaced the website.
If found guilty Mr. Cottle is facing a maximum of 5 years in prison.