16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The targeting of “vaccine misinformation” is a failed marketing tactic for vaccines and a failed PR campaign to cover up the problems with vaccines. By targeting “vaccine misinformation” global health bodies, Big Pharma front groups, and their investors have tried desperately to eradicate INFORMED CONSENT, targeting relevant information pertaining to vaccine side effects, vaccine dangers, and the lack of effectiveness and efficacy of vaccines, including clinical trial fraud and real-world harms that have resulted from mass vaccination campaigns.
By initiating a campaign of false guilt, global health authorities have illegally coerced people to take vaccine products. If true vaccine misinformation was combated, then vaccines would be exposed as medical fraud and rejected by the vast majority of the population. Ironically, this is what is taking place: more people are: becoming injured by vaccines and becoming aware of the cause of their health issues. As more people become aware of vaccine fraud and poisoning, and false claims of efficacy, vaccines become rejected even more. Combating “vaccine misinformation” was a failed, disrespectful tactic that attacked the conscience of individuals, insulting their intelligence and doling out propaganda that is authoritarian and hostile.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Moderna faces suspension over ethical violations in COVID-19 vaccine trials
Moderna could be suspended from the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) of the United Kingdom following multiple violations in the regulatory code of the industry.
The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), set to audit the company over "unacceptable" practices that have "brought discredit upon the industry," reveals multiple violations of Moderna, including offering children £1,500 ($2,008) and teddy bears as incentives to participate in vaccine trials – a practice banned under U.K. regulations.
Moderna claimed it acted promptly after being notified by the Health Research Authority in January 2024. However, evidence shows senior executives were informed in August 2023 by the campaign group UsForThem but failed to intervene.
In turn, the PMCPA ruled the company's lack of transparency "completely unacceptable" and a violation of U.K. clinical trial laws, which prohibit financial incentives for child participants.
A senior Moderna employee also co-authored three articles, including one with former vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi in another breach to promote their COVID-19 vaccines without disclosing his affiliation. The employee also sent promotional tweets from a personal account, failing to declare his role at Moderna. The PMCPA deemed these actions improper advertising, saying the failure to declare conflicts of interest was "unacceptable."
Moreover, the PMCPA has identified ten additional violations, raising concerns about corporate accountability, especially as they involved three senior executives. If deficiencies are found, the Appeal Board could impose sanctions, including suspension or expulsion from the ABPI.
UsForThem founder accuses Moderna of putting profits over child safety
In response to the potential suspension, Molly Kingsley, founder of UsForThem, said that Moderna has repeatedly prioritized profits over safety, particularly concerning children.
"Many of the previous judgments against Moderna have revealed how readily it put profit ahead of the health and safety of children. Now it has also laid bare just how little regard it has had for the regulatory system that was supposed to keep it honest. Never before has a company so new to the pharmaceutical industry been rebuked in this way," Kingsley said.
Meanwhile, critics like Esther McVey, a former member of the all-party parliamentary group on COVID-19 vaccine damage, argued that current penalties fail to deter misconduct.
"The news that the PMCPA is taking the highly unusual step of ordering an audit of Moderna's culture, governance and compliance framework is reputationally damaging, but it is incredible that the regulator has no real power to impose appropriate fines or other meaningful penalties which might make pharmaceutical companies think twice before breaking the rules," McVey said.
"They know they can get away with it, and so they do; time and time again. It's hardly surprising that public trust in the pharmaceutical industry and its regulators is through the floor."
The revelations fuel growing skepticism over pharmaceutical oversight, as campaigners demand stronger enforcement and transparency to restore confidence in vaccine safety.
Watch the video below to learn more about VAIDS and COVID-19 vaccines.
https://www.brighteon.com/3d1f32bb-3a65-4b85-ae6e-fbf28e38cb76
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Grassroots health revolution gains momentum as MAHA movement expands beyond RFK Jr.
The “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) movement, once centered on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign, has evolved into a thriving grassroots revolution prioritizing food transparency, holistic health and systemic reform. Over two months after Kennedy’s confirmation as U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, advocates nationwide are driving localized initiatives, from victory gardens to legislative campaigns, signaling the movement’s enduring impact beyond partisan politics.
The MAHA movement, launched in 2024 amid Kennedy’s promise to overhaul America’s health priorities, now unites organic farmers, medical professionals and everyday families in a push to address rising chronic illnesses, corporate food industry influence and vaccine safety concerns. Kennedy’s FDA crackdown on synthetic dyes, announced in April 2025, represents a federal win for MAHA’s health agenda, but volunteers stress the movement’s grassroots core.
From campaign to community: MAHA’s local roots take hold
At the heart of MAHA lie localized efforts like Jacqueline Capriotti’s Victory Garden Alliance in New Jersey, which educates communities on food sovereignty. “This is about teaching our kids where food comes from,” Capriotti told yourNEWS. “We need healthier generations — MAHA is a health revolution built by the people.”
Similarly, Ohio mother Samantha Rayburn, who teaches herbal remedies through her business Hadassah’s Herbs, echoes this sentiment: “With how sick we are as a society, returning to basics is critical.” Rayburn, like many MAHA advocates, views the movement as a reclaiming of traditional health practices sidelined by industrialized food systems.
The shift toward local solutions became stark during the pandemic, as lockdowns severed global supply chains. “People realized change starts locally,” said Jeff Hutt of the MAHA Action PAC, highlighting state-level bans on artificial food dyes and pesticide pushes like California’s 2026 law phasing out chlorpyrifos.
Kennedy’s FDA sweeps away “toxic soup”
Kennedy’s FDA recently announced a 2026 phaseout of six synthetic dyes like Red No. 40 and Yellow No. 5, citing links to hyperactivity and allergies. The move aligns with MAHA’s broader focus on toxin-free food and healthcare. “These dyes offer no benefit but pose real risks,” Kennedy stated, referencing the NIH’s findings that 60% of U.S. children now suffer chronic illness.
Yet challenges persist. The FDA’s reliance on industry-funded research has drawn criticism, even within MAHA circles. “We need independent science,” said Capriotti, noting corporate lobbying’s historical sway. Meanwhile, food giants like Mars and PepsiCo face costly reforms, though FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary pledged regulatory flexibility.
MAHA’s political muscle expands
The MAHA Action PAC is formalizing grassroot momentum into policy change. Launched by Kennedy’s former aide Del Bigtree, it tracks health bills nationwide and advocates for candidates embracing MAHA’s ethos — later school start times, transparency in vaccine data and organic farming subsidies.
“This isn’t about replacing doctors with herbs,” said Bigtree, emphasizing the PAC’s focus on “lifestyle-first” healthcare. “Drugs should be the last resort.”
Political alliances remain fluid: Kennedy’s victory hinged on mobilizing what Sayer Ji of Stand for Health Freedom calls the “awakening majority” — a coalition bridging liberals, conservatives and independents united by health libertarianism. “MAHA is no longer a niche issue,” Ji said. “People now demand their right to informed choice.”
The MAHA movement’s enduring legacy
With Kennedy’s mandate to reshape federal health agencies, MAHA’s influence ripples beyond food policy. His proposed overhaul of the CDC and NIH aims to dismantle corporate ties, while initiatives like his Autism Health Summit prioritize holistic treatments over pharmaceutical solutions.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
New study proves flu shots cause NEGATIVE EFFICACY — 26.9% higher infection risk, as medical fraud continues
For decades, the mainstream medical establishment has terrorized the public with fear-mongering campaigns, pressuring millions into annual flu shots under the false pretense of protection. But the latest Cleveland Clinic study shatters this fraudulent narrative, proving what truth-seekers have known all along: Flu vaccines don’t just fail—they make you more susceptible to infection.
Key points:
• A new Cleveland Clinic study reveals flu vaccines increase infection risk by 26.9%.
• In the study, an unspeakable negative efficacy was confirmed for the flu vaccine.
• Vaccinated workers more likely to contract influenza after being vaccinated!
• Experts warn flu shots are untested for effectiveness, rely on outdated "grandfathered" licensing that openly permits dangerous vaccines onto the market annually.
• Decades of medical fraud are being exposed as flu vaccines fail to hold up to any scientific rigor.
• Natural immune-boosting strategies - while they don't necessarily prevent all infections - they far surpass ineffective, dangerous pharmaceutical interventions in in terms of efficacy and safety.
The flu shot deception unravels in the age of MAHA
Under the guise of "public health," the flu vaccine industrial complex has normalized medical malpractice, peddling poisonous guesswork as science. Now, a bombshell preprint study—conducted by Cleveland Clinic researchers—has confirmed the horrifying reality: Those who took the flu shot had a 26.9% higher chance of testing positive for influenza compared to the unvaccinated.
"Flu shots are not tested for efficacy before use," warns Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist exposing the reckless approval process. "They are grandfathered in, based on the license of earlier flu vaccines, with rudimentary safety testing."
The study tracked 53,000 employees during the 2024-2025 flu season, adjusting for variables to eliminate bias. The findings? Flu vaccines worsen outcomes, not improve them. This is not an isolated case. A 2009 Canadian study found that prior flu vaccination increased susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic strain. In 2013, another study confirmed repeat flu shots intensified infection risks. The 2016 Cochrane Review concluded there was no solid evidence supporting flu shots in elderly care facilities.
How flu vaccines destroy immunity
Negative efficacy is not new—the same phenomenon occurred with COVID-19 mRNA injections, where more doses increased infection risk. The same corporate-biased health institutions pushing failed flu vaccines also mandated these pharma experiments.
The real reasons behind vaccine-induced harm include:
• Immune imprinting ("original antigenic sin") – Vaccines lock the immune system into outdated virus strains, weakening future defenses.
• Antibody class-switching – Repeated jabs suppress protective immune responses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3) in favor of weaker, problematic IgG4.
• Rapid viral mutation – RNA viruses like influenza evade vaccine-induced immunity, rendering shots obsolete before they even hit the market.
End the medical fraud now
No corporation or government should EVER mandate an untested, ineffective, biologically harmful product. Yet, the CDC and FDA continue to push flu vaccines, even forcing them onto infants and schoolchildren—most at-risk for lifelong immune damage.
If these products make infections worse, why are they still recommended? The medical industrial complex profits from sickness, not health. Natural immune-boosting strategies work better—yet they’re suppressed because healed people don’t generate revenue.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Massachusetts lawmakers want to bar unvaccinated students without medical exemptions from attending school
Massachusetts lawmakers are advancing controversial proposals that would remove religious exemptions for school vaccine mandates and allow minors to receive vaccinations, including Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) shots, without parental consent.
Two bills, introduced in both the Massachusetts House and Senate, seek to remove religious exemptions for school-required vaccines. Under current law, families can cite sincerely held religious beliefs as a valid reason to forgo vaccinations while still enrolling their children in public or private schools. If the legislation passes, only medical exemptions would remain, leaving unvaccinated students without exemptions barred from attending school. This would force families to either comply with state-mandated vaccines or seek alternative education options such as homeschooling.
Another proposal, An Act Promoting Community Immunity, would expand state control over vaccine requirements while further eroding parental rights. According to Health Rights Massachusetts, the bill would allow minors (ages undisclosed) to consent to vaccinations and other "preventative care" without parental knowledge or permission and enable private childcare centers, K-12 schools and colleges to impose additional vaccine mandates (such as COVID-19 shots) beyond state-required immunizations.
This proposal also requires state approval for both religious and medical exemptions, grant the Department of Public Health (DPH) sweeping authority to modify vaccine mandates and exemption criteria, force physicians to sign off on religious exemptions, potentially limiting their availability and label schools with low vaccination rates as "Elevated Risk," allowing them to exclude unvaccinated children even without an active disease outbreak.
This bill effectively removes parental rights while giving the government broad power to set vaccination policies without legislative oversight. If passed, the legislation would make Massachusetts the seventh state to eliminate non-medical exemptions for K-12 student vaccinations. This could strip parents of their ability to opt their children out of immunizations based on religious objections while granting healthcare providers authority to vaccinate minors without parental involvement.
A third proposal, called An Act Enhancing Access to Abortion, includes provisions allowing minors to independently consent to all forms of reproductive healthcare and so-called preventative care, including vaccines and sterilization, without parental involvement.
Health Action Massachusetts noted that the bill lacks age restrictions or mental competency standards. Meaning, a young teenager could theoretically consent to medical interventions without parental awareness.
Advocacy groups mobilize resistance to the controversial proposals
This is not the first time Massachusetts has attempted to remove religious exemptions.
Lawmakers pushed a similar bill during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it fizzled in committee after overwhelming public backlash. "They invited people to come online … for three minutes each and there were 400 or 500 people online and they let all of them testify. It was amazing. It went on for hours and hours and hours." Beth Ingham, a leader of the Children's Health Defense's (CHD) New England Chapter, recalled.
Now, with three new bills under consideration, advocacy groups like Health Rights MA and Health Action Massachusetts are mobilizing resistance by providing resources and action alerts to inform the public.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Trump’s tariff policies ignite a manufacturing renaissance as U.S. businesses hail “fair play” over global dominance
On April 25, President Donald J. Trump’s aggressive tariff policies targeting foreign automakers and manufacturers in Mexico and China sparked a surge of support from American businesses, which credit the measures with stemming decades of job losses and reviving domestic industries. The administration’s strategy, framed as a defense of "fair trade," has drawn bipartisan cheers from family-owned firms, tech giants and defense contractors, who report renewed confidence in reshoring jobs and investments. With Chinese automakers eyeing U.S. markets through Mexican plants, Trump’s vow to impose "whatever tariffs are required"—including rates as steep as 200%—has galvanized industries from steel to aerospace. Businesses nationwide describe the policies as essential to countering unfair foreign subsidies and protecting national security, while critics warn of trade wars and economic friction.
Businesses rally behind “fair play” policies
Small manufacturers, often overshadowed in global trade debates, are at the forefront of the pro-tariff movement. Walker Forge, a third-generation Wisconsin company supplying forgings to the defense sector, celebrated Trump’s focus on manufacturing: “This is the first time in generations we have a president who puts American manufacturing first,” said President Will Walker. Similarly, Franchino Mold & Engineering in Michigan, founded in 1953, declared tariffs a path to fairness after years of competing against subsidized Chinese moldmakers. “Our raw materials alone cost more than entire molds from China,” said President Mike Hetherington. “These policies aren’t protectionism—they’re a lifeline.”
The impact is tangible: TK Mold & Engineering in Michigan reported three reshoring requests in three days, while Westminster Tool in Connecticut saw a 25% spike in moldmaking inquiries. Even industrial titan NVIDIA joined the chorus, pledging $500 billion in U.S. AI supercomputer plants — a nod to the broader economic ripple effects. For many companies, the shift feels existential. “President Trump’s fight isn’t just about taxes or tariffs,” said Dyersville Die Cast President Robert Willits. “He’s fighting for America’s soul.”
Decades of decline and the road to Trump’s tariffs
The nostalgia for “Made in the USA” products masks a longer story of erosion: from 1990 to 2010, U.S. manufacturing employment dropped by nearly one-third amid globalized supply chains and lax trade enforcement. Previous administrations, including those of presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, largely embraced free-trade agreements like NAFTA and failed to address rampant Chinese dumping of steel and goods. The 2018 Trump tariffs on steel and aluminum offered a preview of his current strategy, saving thousands of jobs but facing WTO challenges.
The current wave diverges by targeting not just prices but systemic imbalances. “Unsubsidized American companies can’t compete when China treats industries as sovereign weapons,” said Metallus CEO Michael Williams, whose Ohio-based firm supplies recycled metals to defense and automotive sectors. ELLWOOD, a 115-year-old Pennsylvania metals firm, echoes this view: “Current trade practices are a knife to the throat of U.S. manufacturing,” said CEO Ben Huffman. The policies now, he argued, force global supply chains to “rewire” in favor of fair competition.
Tariffs as national security and economic strategy
The debate over tariffs transcends economics, touching on national security fears. The Pentagon has long warned of a shrinking domestic industrial base critical for wartime needs. “If we offshored every advanced moldmaking process, what happens if China cuts off supplies during a crisis?” asked Campbell Press Repair’s Pete Campbell. Trump’s officials similarly frame the policies as shoring up industries vital to both everyday products and defense tools like aircraft engines.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
The polio vaccine’s dark side: Massive shedding and outbreak-driven mutations
In a groundbreaking study published in NPJ Vaccines, Chinese researchers have unearthed a shocking truth about the oral polio vaccine (OPV). The vaccine, administered globally to eradicate polio, is now becoming a driving force behind polio outbreaks and transmitting vaccine-derived viruses at an alarming rate. This revelation throws a wrench into the global efforts to eliminate polio and raises serious questions about the safety and efficacy of OPV.
Key points:
• Over 80% of infants shed live polio virus after OPV vaccination, enrolling in the viral shedding race.
• Shedding continued for weeks in over 10% of infants, maintaining a steady supply of vaccination-derived viruses.
• Type 3 shedding was the most dangerous, with the longest duration (up to 28 days), highest rate (up to 91.7%), and fastest mutation accumulation.
• OPV-derived viruses are transmissible, with 2.3% of unvaccinated infants grateful recipients.
• WPV2 and WPV3 were eradicated, but VDPVs have replaced WPV cases worldwide.
• Vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 accounted for the highest number of cases, despite the removal of type 2 from OPV.
• Re-vaccination with OPV can't stop VDPV circulation, presenting a bleak outlook for eradication.
More than 80% of infants shed live polio virus after vaccination
The study, conducted by the Institute of Medical Biology in China, followed 1,200 infants who received either a bivalent (types 1 and 3) or trivalent (types 1, 2, and 3) OPV. The results are staggering: more than 80% of infants tested positive for poliovirus in their stool just seven days after vaccination. Moreover, over 10% of these infants continued to shed virus for up to 28 days.
Worse still, these vaccine-derived viruses don't simply disappear; they evolve, regaining their strength and pathogenicity. The study confirms what polio researchers have long known: OPV-derived viruses can cause polio, with no meaningful difference between wild and vaccine-derived polio viruses.
Vaccine-derived polioviruses now cause 828% more paralysis than wild polio
The implications are alarming. Despite the eradication of wild poliovirus types 2 (WPV2) and 3 (WPV3), vaccine-derived polio viruses (VDPVs) are now the primary cause of polio outbreaks worldwide. Between 2018 and 2023, there were only 397 wild poliovirus cases globally, but 3,684 cases caused by circulating vaccine-derived strains (cVDPV). That means vaccine-derived polio caused approximately 828% more cases than wild polio.
"The majority of global paralytic poliomyelitis cases are now attributed to poliovirus shedding from OPV rather than WPV," the study states.
Type 3 shedding poses the greatest threat
Among the three polio types, type 3 had the longest shedding duration, the highest shedding rate, and the fastest mutation accumulation. Multiple mutation hotspots were identified, with some shifting the virus back to neurovirulent forms, capable of paralyzing vaccine recipients and their close contacts.
OPV replicates in the gut and can be excreted via stool and other bodily fluids. The study confirms that vaccinated children can transmit the virus to their close contacts, including unvaccinated children, allowing it to circulate and mutate rapidly in the community.
WHO's failed pivot: From tOPV to bOPV
In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) attempted to mitigate risk by removing type 2 from the trivalent OPV (tOPV), replacing it with bivalent OPV (bOPV, types 1 and 3). However, this move backfired, with the study noting a slight increase in the shedding rate of type 3 following the removal of type 2. Without type 2 to balance replication competition in the gut, type 3 replicated and mutated more aggressively, leading to rising cVDPV3 detection rates in recent years.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Big Pharma launches “Vaccine Integrity Project” to combat Secretary Kennedy and keep 94 shots going into kids with mandates and liability protections
In a blatant bid to police truth and prop up a collapsing industry, Big Pharma and their allies have unleashed the Vaccine Integrity Project (VIP), a shadow initiative funded by Walmart heiress Christy Walton and helmed by discredited public health bureaucrats. This so-called “science-based” project is a cynical tool to stifle growing scrutiny of vaccines and block efforts by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to expose the toxic links between mandated shots and health disasters like autism. Far from safeguarding public health, the VIP is a laundering operation for corporate greed, academic complicity, and runaway government overreach. In essence, the group is trying to protect the 94 shots for children and the liability protections for the vaccine industry that have allowed vaccine manufacturers to get away with murder for over three decades.
Key points:
• VIP’s agenda: Funded by Walmart heiress Christy Walton, the Vaccine Integrity Project is an elite ploy to protect Big Pharma’s 94-shot CDC mandate and shield companies from vaccine-related liability.
• Key figures: Former FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg and biosecurity architect Harvey Fineberg lead the effort—both with deep ties to pharmaceutical interests and industry-funded nonprofits.
• Target: Directly undermines HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s mission to investigate vaccine-autism links and pursue transparency in public health policy.
• Transparent deception: The project’s “independent science” slogan is a facade—a handpicked panel of establishment insiders aims to silence dissent and weaponize fear for profit.
A cloak of philanthropy: Unmasking the true face of the VIP
The Vaccine Integrity Project, launched this month, is fronted as a “nonpartisan” effort to “safeguard vaccine integrity.” Its $240,000 backing by Walton’s iAlumbra—a nonprofit she founded to “catalyze models for economic growth”—wears its financial motives thin. Walton’s Walmart fortune, built on pandemic-era profiteering, speaks volumes about her “philanthropy.” During lockdowns, Walmart’s pharmacies and supply chains reaped billions, creating a direct financial incentive to defend any policy boosting vaccine mandates.
CIDRAP at the University of Minnesota, which hosts the VIP, has Weaponized fear under Michael Osterholm—a pandemic hawk who endorsed lockdowns and aligned with the Gates Foundation’s vaccine agenda—to push Pharma’s desperate narrative. The VIP’s claim of “independent science” rings hollow when its lead funders and advisors include:
• Margaret Hamburg, ex-FDA chief turned Gates-funded gatekeeper, whose tenure was marred by rubber-stamping Pharma profits while her husband’s hedge fund invested in drug companies.
• Harvey Fineberg, “biosecurity” architect and former Institute of Medicine president, whose career is built on expanding public health surveillance and normalizing coercion.
“The VIP isn’t about science; it’s about circle-jerk credibility among people who’ve spent careers attacking parents who dare question vaccine safety,” says Nebraskan chiropractor Ben Tapper, exposing how industry insiders are styling themselves as “independent experts” for public consumption.
Pharma’s puppeteers: The VIP’s handpicked army of dishonesty
The VIP’s Steering Committee is a veritable who’s-who of pro-vaccine apologists. Hamburg and Fineberg’s selections ensure critics are excluded, as transparency and dissent are banished to favor “curated, sanitized data service to industry.”
Michael Osterholm: Lockdown cheerleader and recipient of Walton’s $500,000 endowment at the University of Minnesota. His ideology? Panic-based public compliance.
Gates Foundation Links: Hamburg’s seat on the Gates Scientific Advisory Board—where autism concerns are routinely dismissed—guarantees the VIP dogma stays aligned with Microsoft billionaire interests.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A test for public health and privacy
The bill must pass both houses by June 6 to reach Gov. Kathy Hochul’s desk. While it cleared the Assembly twice before, its Senate fate remains uncertain. Gilmore admitted timing is unpredictable but noted political pressure could stall it in an election year. “We’ve got to keep the heat on,” he said.
The RFK Jr. Act’s outcome could set a national precedent, particularly as Kennedy’s HHS leadership redefines federal health policy. For opponents, the debate crystallizes a broader struggle: balancing disease prevention with individual autonomy. As Kane put it, “Healthcare should be a right, not a surveillance tool.”
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. pushes CDC to drop COVID-19 vaccine recommendation for children, citing lack of benefit
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is privately urging the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to stop recommending Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines for children, according to sources familiar with the discussions.
Kennedy, a longtime skeptic of vaccine mandates, argues that scientific evidence does not support vaccinating young children against a virus that poses minimal risk to them. If successful, this move could reshape national immunization policies, affecting pediatric care, school vaccine requirements and insurance coverage.
Kennedy’s push comes as the CDC's independent vaccine advisory committee considers shifting from a universal recommendation to a risk-based approach for COVID-19 shots. Currently, the CDC advises all children six months and older to receive either Pfizer's three-dose series or Moderna's two-dose regimen, plus annual boosters. Removing the vaccine from the childhood schedule would not ban its use but would signal a dramatic reversal of federal health guidance.
Studies consistently show that healthy children face an extremely low risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19. A Johns Hopkins University study led by Dr. Marty Makary, now Food and Drug Administration commissioner, found zero deaths among 48,000 children under 18 without preexisting conditions.
Meanwhile, concerns persist about vaccine-related myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation), particularly in adolescent boys. European nations like Germany and Sweden no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children, citing unfavorable risk-benefit analyses.
CDC's June vote could end COVID-19 shots for children
If the CDC revises its stance, the decision could ripple through state policies, insurance coverage and medical practices. Medicaid, which insures 40 percent of U.S. children, bases its vaccine reimbursements on CDC guidelines. Pediatricians participating in the CDC's Vaccines for Children Program are required to administer all scheduled immunizations – meaning a policy shift could alter standard care.
Kennedy has long criticized COVID-19 vaccines for children. In 2022, he warned the Department of Health and Human Services that authorizing shots for kids under five was "reckless," citing unresolved safety questions.
His allies applaud the potential policy change, calling it overdue. Critics, however, fear it could erode trust in vaccines broadly.
Parental hesitancy has kept childhood COVID-19 vaccination rates strikingly low; just 13 percent of U.S. children have received the latest booster. Many states, responding to political pressure, have banned school mandates for the vaccine. With the CDC advisory committee set to vote in June, the outcome could redefine pandemic-era health policy and reignite fierce debates over science, safety and government oversight.
Watch this video of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. exposing the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines.
https://www.brighteon.com/a7011e6f-299b-477f-a9f1-b7f474c76766
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
HHS Secretary Kennedy considers removing COVID-19 vaccine from childhood immunization schedule
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is reportedly considering the removal of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) childhood immunization schedule.
This potential shift comes amid ongoing debates over vaccine efficacy and safety, reflecting broader public health policy changes under the administration of President Donald Trump.
According to Politico, two sources familiar with the discussions revealed that the proposal under consideration would eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine from the CDC's childhood vaccination guidance. HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon confirmed that "no final decision has been made." The CDC currently recommends one or more doses of the 2024–2025 COVID-19 vaccine for children aged six months to 18 years.
The potential removal of the COVID-19 vaccine from the immunization schedule marks a significant shift in policy. The CDC added the vaccine to its schedule in 2022 after an outside advisory panel unanimously endorsed its inclusion. At the time, CDC officials stated that the decision would "normalize" the shot and encourage people to stay up to date on their vaccinations.
Kennedy's consideration to remove the COVID-19 vaccine is part of a broader reevaluation of federal health mandates. Earlier this month, Kennedy and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Marty Makary announced plans to eliminate petroleum-based food dyes from the national food supply, citing scientific evidence linking them to various health issues.
"For the last 50 years, American children have increasingly been living in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals," Makary said.
Concerns over chronic illness
Kennedy has tied the rise in chronic illness to systemic regulatory failure.
"There was zero spent in this country treating chronic disease when my uncle was President. Today it's about $1.8 trillion annually – it's bankrupting our nation," he stated.
He also noted that 74 percent of American youth are ineligible for military service due to health issues, highlighting a long-term health crisis.
The debate over vaccines is not new. In the 20th century, vaccines eradicated or controlled diseases like smallpox, polio and measles. However, the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine reignited debates over vaccine safety and efficacy. The pandemic response, heavily politicized, has left a legacy of distrust in some quarters.
Public response and political implications
The potential change in the immunization schedule has sparked a range of reactions. Public health experts worry that removing the COVID-19 vaccine could undermine faith in vaccines and lead to more drastic changes. Pediatric infectious disease specialist Paul Offit likened Kennedy's approach to "checking where in the fence is a weakness," suggesting it could cause significant harm.
Current data from the CDC indicate that only 13 percent of children have received the latest COVID-19 shot. The low uptake, coupled with the fact that no states currently mandate the COVID-19 vaccine for students, suggests that the change might have a limited immediate impact on vaccination rates.
Kennedy initially pledged not to alter the immunization schedule to secure support for his confirmation from Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), a critical swing vote. However, after taking office, Kennedy vowed to reexamine the childhood schedule, calling it a topic that had been "taboo or insufficiently scrutinized."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Health Ranger Report: Dr. Suzanne Humphries reveals the hidden history of disease decline before vaccines were introduced
The conventional narrative credits vaccines as the primary savior of modern public health. But Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a renowned nephrologist and author of "Dissolving Illusions," challenges this myth.
During an appearance on the "Health Ranger Report" with Mike Adams, she revealed that deadly diseases like polio and measles were already in steep decline long before vaccines appeared – thanks to advancements in sanitation, nutrition and hygiene. Her work exposes a disturbing truth: the medical establishment has rewritten history to justify billions in pharmaceutical profits, sidelining the real heroes of public health.
According to Humphries, polio's death rate plummeted decades before the Salk and Sabin vaccines were introduced in the 1950s. Improved sanitation infrastructure – clean water, sewage systems and better hygiene practices – greatly reduced the spread of pathogens.
Similarly, measles incidence dropped significantly in the early 20th century due to better nutrition and living conditions. Yet, vaccines became the poster child for this progress – a narrative that persists despite historical data proving otherwise.
Humphries explained that the real cripplers of children was rheumatic fever, which was overlooked because they lacked the media hype polio received. She added that the stories of widespread paralysis were disproportionate to the actual low incidence rates.
The medical doctor and board-certified internist emphasized that fear-driven campaigns amplified by the March of Dimes and media sensationalism obscured the truth: Societies were healthier long before vaccines arrived.
Vaccines were pushed as part of profit-driven narrative
Humphries accuses the medical-industrial complex of perpetuating a "historical whitewash." By framing vaccines as singularly responsible for eradicating diseases, drug companies secure perpetual profits.
"The death rates were declining significantly before the vaccine came," she said. Humphries noted that diseases like polio and measles were already plummeting due to societal improvements. This manipulation of history isn't new, however.
Humphries highlighted how early vaccine critics, like smallpox doctors in the 19th century, were silenced as "quacks" when they pointed out vaccines caused adverse reactions. She said that whistleblowers today like herself face similar demonization, referencing relentless attacks after her viral appearance on "The Joe Rogan Experience."
Humphries' research also shines a light on vaccine ingredients, including aluminum adjuvants and squalene, which intentionally trigger inflammation to boost immune responses. These additives, she argues, are inherently toxic, disproportionately harming children with genetic vulnerabilities or poor nutrition.
The nephrologist and author pointed out that vaccines on mitochondrial-deficient babies have not been tested and they wind up with autism or seizures post-vaccination, citing cases like Hannah Poling, whose family won a $1.5 million settlement after vaccines triggered her autism.
The dark side of modern healthcare
The interview also critiqued systemic failures in modern medicine, such as hospitals serving nutrient-poor diets while banning patient nutrition. Humphries noted that taking medication like Tylenol over vitamin C impairs recovery, referencing a recent measles case where poor nutrition likely worsened the outcome. She added that hospitals attack the immune system at every turn with steroids, antibiotics and stress while claiming they are the only safe haven.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Eerie white clots revealed: mRNA vaccines spawning global prion crisis, scientists warn
Independent researchers have discovered that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein spliced into “vaccine” molecules is generating prion-like amyloid clots in human blood. These misfolded protein deposits, identified in embalmed cadavers and confirmed by cutting-edge diagnostic tools, are now linked to cardiovascular collapse, neurodegeneration, and sudden death.
Key points:
• Prion-like clots: Analysis confirms spike protein-linked amyloid structures in post-vaccination clots, capable of triggering neurodegenerative disease.
• 90% spiked blood: 90% of blood samples show spike-induced amyloidogenic peptides, risking systemic harm.
• Deadly outcomes: A 60-year-old’s fatal case links vaccine-derived clots to rapid neurodegeneration, with prion-like pathology.
• Expert validation: Renowned researchers McCairn and Pretorius confirm systemic amyloidosis, sounding alarms over long-term health collapses.
The shadow pandemic of white clots
Dr. Kevin McCairn, a neuroscientist who presented breakthrough findings to Health Alliance Australia, uncovered a nightmare scenario: nearly all blood samples from vaccinated individuals now contain amyloidogenic peptides, while post-mortem clots retain prion signals months after death. “We are witnessing the first known instance of engineered amyloidosis,” McCairn states in a leaked video. “These clots aren’t normal — they’re proteinaceous agents capable of propagating their own destruction.”
The evidence is unequivocal: spike protein exposure, whether via infection or injection, is creating a global infection of misfolded fibrin. “What we’re seeing in the clots,” explains Dr. Resia Pretorius, a South African clotting authority, “are amyloid proteins collapsing blood flow, evading clearance, and embedding themselves into tissues. This isn’t thrombosis—it’s a new systemic disease.”
The infection that doesn’t leave
Raman spectroscopy and RT-QuIC tests confirm the clots’ prion-like nature. Founders of the authoritative Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion method — gold standard for prion detection — report 7-hour spike-protein clot signals, matching those of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. These clots, described as “white fibrous masses” by embalmers, are notorious for resisting dissolution and spreading beyond blood vessels into organs.
Worse, the spike protein’s synthetic design contains 23 prion-like motifs, as documented in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (Feb 2021). Dr. McCairn’s lab now confirms these sequences act as templates for misfolding native proteins, creating a viral “Trojan horse” that hijacks human biochemistry.
“Imagine a single misfolded protein,” explains McCairn. “It turns neighbor proteins into converted agents, triggering exponential amyloid formation. This is exactly how mad cow disease ignited epidemics of brain decay—and now, it’s been bio-engineered into millions.”
Death by a thousand clots
A case described in the European Journal of Neurology illustrates the human cost. A 60-year-old woman developed rapid dementia, rigidity, and neurological collapse within days of her second injection. Despite aggressive treatments, her brain scans showed “cortical ribboning,” a hallmark of fatal prion disorders like sporadic CJD. She died within a month, her death certificate omitting any mention of vaccine-derived amyloids.
X-ray fluorescence reveals these clots also contain nanoparticles of aluminum, iron, and chromium — a toxic cocktail exacerbating oxidative stress. Dr. Pretorius warns the clots act as “slow-fuse bombs,” impairing vital organs while evading detection. Ongoing oxygen deprivation and micro-infarcts explain the “mysterious” post-vaccine fatigue, cognitive decline, and cardiovascular emergencies plaguing millions.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
World Economic Forum’s current downfall exposes legacy of totalitarianism, financial fraud, and crimes against humanity
The World Economic Forum (WEF), once the glittering hub of globalist strategizing, is now the epicenter of a crumbling empire. Embroiled in financial and moral crises, the WEF’s fall unravels decades of influence peddling and exposes its true mission: a totalitarian power grab under the guise of “progress.” For years, the organization has championed policies that prioritize profit and control over human liberties — a legacy now under scrutiny as Schwab exits in disgrace.
• WEF faces collapse as founder Klaus Schwab resigns amid investigations into misuse of funds, racial discrimination, and fostering a toxic workplace.
• Decades of anti-human policies — from vaccine mandates to surveillance states — highlight the Forum’s authoritarian roots.
• Free and independent thinkers argue WEF’s “Great Reset” agenda seeks to exploit crises like pandemics to centralize global control.
Historical crimes against humanity tied to WEF’s agenda
The WEF’s fingerprints are on some of the most controversial policies of the 21st century. Its Great Reset campaign, launched during the pandemic, promoted heavy-handed lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and forced digitization. Critics argue this agenda enriches biotech and tech elites while destabilizing economies and healthcare systems.
The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Great Reset agenda, with its emphasis on centralized control and technocratic governance, mirrors historical systems that prioritized elite agendas over human rights. One thread runs from eugenics movements to modern vaccine mandates. In the early 20th century, eugenics — a pseudoscience endorsed by elites like the Rockefellers and Carnegie — justified forced sterilizations in the U.S. and Nazi Germany. Today, critics argue that WEF-aligned vaccine mandates echo this ethos by framing public health measures as imperatives, often without informed consent. Schwab’s post-pandemic call to “build back better” drew comparisons to historical crises exploited for social control, much like Mussolini’s rise during Italy’s economic collapse.
WEF’s push for “carbon inflation” and energy privatization also parallels dark chapters in development history. Colonial-era resource extraction policies displaced Indigenous communities and created famines, as seen under British rule in colonial India, where colonial authorities prioritized cash crop exports over food security, exacerbating the Great Famine of 1876–1878. Similarly, contemporary “green” policies have stifled local agriculture in Africa and South America, displacing communities under the guise of conservation. The WEF’s Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders has invested in carbon offset schemes criticized for land grabs, enriching elites while ravaging subsistence farmers — reminiscent of 19th-century rubber barons in Congo who enslaved locals for profit.
Lockdowns and digitization mandates, another pillar of the Great Reset, recall unethical quarantine practices. During the 14th-century Black Death, European authorities enforced unjust quarantines that worsened mortality by isolating the poor without aid. Today’s lockdowns, while initially framed to flatten curves, have been weaponized to erode civil liberties, disproportionately harming marginalized populations who cannot afford remote work or digital tools. Psychologist Thomas Szasz warned in the 1970s that psychiatry risked becoming a tool of social control — now, critics argue, digital surveillance and biometric tracking under WEF’s “Great Reset” are fulfilling his dystopian vision.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Repeated COVID jabs WORSEN survival outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients, according to new study
Landmark study links mRNA vaccinations to pancreatic cancer mortality risks
On April 15, a groundbreaking Japanese study exposed a chilling correlation: repeated doses of mRNA covid vaccinations are associated with significantly poorer survival outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients. Published as a pre-print, the research—based on a cohort of 272 patients—found that those vaccinated three or more times had shorter survival rates compared to those with fewer doses. These results emerged against the backdrop of the World Health Organization (WHO) finalizing a pandemic agreement on April 16, which prioritizes global distribution of mRNA vaccines in future health crises. The study’s implications are stark: a class of vaccines marketed as protective may, in some cases, worsen rather than improve health outcomes.
The research, led by Dr. M. Abue and colleagues, identified elevated IgG4 antibody levels—a type of immune-suppressing molecule—as a key factor. Repeated injections drove IgG4 spikes, which correlated with reduced tumor-fighting immune responses and shorter patient survival. This finding mirrors a growing body of science suggesting mRNA vaccines disrupt immune balance, fostering conditions ripe for cancer progression.
The WHO’s timing, however, is contentious. Days after the study’s release, the global health body pushed forward with its pandemic treaty, framing mRNA vaccine proliferation as a moral imperative—even as adverse-event reports and studies like this one highlight risks. The agreement, set for ratification in May, sidesteps critical questions about long-term safety, prioritizing vaccines’ scalability over individual health concerns.
The psychology of denial: Institutions vs. evidence
Why would the WHO advance a policy contradicting independent studies? Psychology offers clues. Institutions prone to group think—where dissent is stifled in favor of consensus—often cling to preexisting frameworks, even when evidence shifts. The WHO’s promotion of mRNA “sharing” mirrors historical patterns, such as the 1960s-era dismissal of thalidomide’s teratogenic effects, where corporate and institutional loyalties outweighed public harm concerns.
Dr. Robert Malone, a biotech pioneer who pioneered mRNA delivery, warned early in the pandemic of potential risks, including immune dysregulation. His warnings were sidelined—evidence that authorities may prioritize expediency over rigor when profit or reputational capital is at stake. The Japanese scientists’ conclusion—that IgG4’s immune-suppression “may be associated with poor prognosis”—is a scientific indictment of this prioritization.
Psychologically, individuals within large bureaucracies may also experience cognitive dissonance, rationalizing harm by compartmentalizing their roles. For example, vaccine advocates might frame pancreatic cancer mortality as an “unintended side effect,” a common rhetorical escape hatch when evidence undermines mission goals.
Historical context: The repeat of iatrogenic crises
The study’s findings echo earlier medical disasters. Consider the 1940s–70s asbestos industry, where corporate entities hid lethal health risks behind a veneer of economic necessity. Similarly, the Japanese research reveals a system echoing thalidomide’s timeline: rapid rollout, suppressed warnings, and delayed acceptance of harm. Both scenarios hinge on systemic opacity—those profiting from the product actively hinder transparency.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
EU’s digital censorship SURTAX and vaccine “misinformation” CRACKDOWN targets vaccine truth seekers in Orwellian push for conformity
The European Union has officially weaponized its censorship apparatus, leveraging the Digital Services Act (DSA) to stifle online dissent about vaccines while citing surging measles cases and fabricated crises. By framing vaccine skepticism as a threat to “democracy,” Brussels now grants itself emergency powers to censor critical voices, prioritizing propaganda over informed consent. As health officials blame public mistrust on “disinformation,” they ignore growing evidence of vaccine inefficacy, side effects, and clinical trial fraud—exposing the DSA as a tool to shield pharmaceutical interests rather than protect public health.
Main points of the story:
• The EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) now enforces “crisis mechanisms” allowing unprecedented censorship of online dissent, branding vaccine skepticism as “misinformation.”
• Low vaccination rates are blamed on public distrust caused by “disinformation,” masking systemic failures in vaccine efficacy and transparency.
• A new law permits EU authorities to declare internet “emergencies,” silencing critics under vague terms like “public security threats.”
• Big Tech companies are complying, risking collusion with authoritarian-style speech control.
The DSA’s double-edged sword: Suppressing truth to protect profits
The EU’s expansion of DSA rules mandates a sweeping crackdown on “vaccine misinformation,” despite mounting reports of vaccine-linked injuries and stagnant disease prevention. A European Commission spokesperson warned of “doubled” 2024 measles cases compared to 2023, yet data reveals little correlation between increased vaccination rates and reduced outbreaks. For instance, recent studies highlight that Brazil and the U.S., with high vaccine uptake, still faced scarlet fever and meningitis surges, undermining claims that “safe and efficient” vaccines alone prevent epidemics.
EU officials dismiss legitimate concerns about side effects—such as myocarditis among young males—vaccines frequently cited by health professionals—as “myths” requiring censorship. The new crisis now permits Brussels to declare digital “emergencies,” ordering tech giants to delete posts questioning vaccine safety. Daphne Keller of Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center noted this law’s nebulous standards: “It looks like the war in Ukraine created a political opportunity for tighter restrictions. That’s politics, if bad law.”
But critics argue it’s more than bad law—it’s a surrender to authoritarianism. By criminalizing dissent, the EU undercuts principles of liberty it once championed.
Hostile medicine: Coercion and control
The EU’s dual-track strategy pairs censorship with aggressive propaganda, such as the “United in Protection” campaign, which peddles “evidence-based” messaging defined solely by health authorities. These efforts tie vaccination to unrelated initiatives like cancer prevention plans, conflating consent with compliance.
Health professionals are coerced into parroting EU lines, part of the Commission’s “Coalition for Vaccination.” Simultaneously, the European External Action Service monitors dissent, framing it as subversive to democracy. This parallels global trends where crises like Ukraine—and pandemic panic—are used to justify silencing critics, transforming free speech zones like social media into echo chambers for state narratives.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Yet sustainability hinges on community-driven action. “This movement’s strength is personal empowerment,” Ji noted, citing victory gardens, natural healing circles and state-level bills as proof of MAHA’s decentralized power.
As debates over synthetic dyes and vaccine mandates intensify, the MAHA blueprint — rooted in localism, transparency and tradition — offers a radical yet growing vision for American health. “MAHA isn’t just RFK’s dream,” said Rayburn. “It’s millions of families saying: We’re done trading our health for convenience.”
A health revolution forged in community
The Make America Healthy Again movement has transcended its founder, proving that systemic change begins at the kitchen table and in the garden patch. As states ban toxic dyes and families rediscover herbal remedies, MAHA’s enduring promise lies not in political figures — but in the collective demand for a healthier world, one informed choice at a time.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The solution:
• Reject all medical coercion—No vaccine mandates for any age group. This includes healthcare workers, who, for decades, have been subject to workplace flu vaccine mandates, and extreme coercion to go along with the fraud.
• Strengthen immunity naturally to be prepared for inevitable infections—Sunlight, clean food, detoxification, and stress reduction outperform toxic Big Pharma products.
• Demand accountability—Prosecute corporations and regulators for decades of fraud, and remove the damn vaccine from the market, with no subsidies and no liability protections to keep the fraud persisting.
For too long, the public has been treated as lab rats for Big Pharma’s profit machine. The Cleveland Clinic study is just the latest confirmation of a systematic medical deception—one that must end immediately. Will lawmakers finally pull these dangerous flu shots off the market? Or will the vaccine industrial complex continue its reign of fraud and human experimentation?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
"Health Rights MA opposes the following bills (pertaining to the proposals). Below you will find opposition letter templates to get you started and a link to find your lawmakers. A phone call is worth at least 100 emails so please do both! A meeting is worth 1,000 emails, so please get one of those if you can. A Health Rights MA member would be happy to attend with you," the advocacy group wrote in the call to action on their official website.
Watch the video below about a Minnesota nurse revealing an internal memo telling clinicians not to offer medical exemptions for the COVID-19 vaccine.
https://www.brighteon.com/f22f0a08-50cc-4e86-8027-a934da76515c
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The ripple effects are spreading. Industrial Molds, Inc. in Illinois, with just 52 employees, shifted its 2025 hiring from 0 to 12 new workers due to tariff-driven demand. For communities, the shift is personal. “This isn’t just about tariffs,” said Twin Cities Die Casting’s Todd Olson. “It’s about ending generational poverty in towns where factories once closed.”
A new era of “American First”
As businesses brace for November’s election, Trump’s tariff policies have crystallized into a defining issue for conservatives and industrial states. The White House touts the resurgence as proof of its strategy — $2.3 trillion in manufacturing investments since 2020 — but critics question long-term costs. Meanwhile, companies like Legacy Precision Molds urge the administration to solidify reforms. “Tariffs are a starting point, not a finish line,” said Vice President Tyler VanRee. “We need sustained policy to rebuild our innovation edge.”
For now, the rallying cry of “fairness” unites a coalition once fractured by globalism. In both boardrooms and small-town workshops, the message is clear: Put America first — or see the consequences.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
IPV alone doesn't stop transmission. Although inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) is safer and doesn't replicate in the gut, it also doesn't halt fecal-oral spread. This leaves a dangerous gap, allowing silent transmission even as the world moves toward polio eradication.
This new evidence confirms what global health authorities have tried to obscure: OPV is not just risky; it is driving outbreaks. To eradication efforts, OPV recipients shed virus that mutates rapidly, spreads to others, and causes polio in areas of low vaccination coverage. In 2025, the dominant strains of polio circulating in the world will no longer come from nature; they will come from the vaccine itself.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The group’s first “priority” isn’t studying autism clusters or inflammation risks but defending the CDC’s failed 94-dose mandate. Jablonowski of Children’s Health Defense notes their reluctance to even acknowledge Wakefield’s vindicated research on vaccine injury: “These people don’t want answers—they want a propaganda machine to silence people like Kennedy.”
The VIP’s war on health freedom and scientific integrity
Make no mistake—the VIP’s timing is no accident. With RFK Jr. now at HHS, exposing buried studies and seeking liability reform, Pharma sees its golden goose at risk. By creating a parallel “science authority,” the project seeks to neutralize the Secretary’s reach, framing valid criticisms as “anti-science.”
“Secretary Kennedy’s been burning incriminating Pharma docs for months—and now the industry wants a legally unaccountable panel to bypass that,” says Sayer Ji of Stand for Health Freedom. The project’s stated goal? “Insurance” against a future where honest science guides policy instead of profits.
Ji warns of the VIP’s power to pressure hospitals, insurers, and media into towing the party line: “Imagine a ‘science committee’ so credible, states stop investigating vaccine harm. That’s the plan.”
The Vaccine Integrity Project is a Trojan horse—a Silicon Valley-style tech “solution” grafted onto healthcare to bypass accountability. Its leaders admit, via the New York Times, that “the government can’t be trusted to act in the public’s interest.” But while disingenuously decrying political interference, they flip the script to install their own unelected elites.
As Christy Walton’s billions build walls around the vaccine trust, we’re reminded: when elites cloak lies in “science,” it isn’t about health—it’s about control.
“Vaccine policies shouldn’t be written in boardrooms,” fumes Jacob-Schwartz of the Autism Health Summit. “They should be shaped by parents who’ve buried children killed by the current system.”
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Metals that heal: Copper, silver, gold nanoparticles show promise in cancer treatment and autoimmune therapy
In a world where heavy metals like mercury and lead are often vilified for their toxic effects, researchers and holistic health experts are uncovering the remarkable healing potential of noble metals—specifically copper, silver, and gold—when used in precise, bioavailable forms.
Robert Scott Bell, a renowned homeopathic practitioner and advocate for alternative medicine, has spent years exploring the therapeutic applications of these metals. Unlike conventional medical dogma, which often dismisses metals as hazardous, Bell emphasizes their ability to regenerate tissue, fight infections, and even target cancer cells without the devastating side effects of mainstream treatments like chemotherapy.
From Toxins to Therapeutics: The Silver Revolution
Bell’s journey into metal-based medicine began with Dr. Robert Becker’s groundbreaking book, The Body Electric, which detailed how silver ions could promote wound healing and tissue regeneration.
"Rather than being degenerative, silver in its bioactive state facilitates epithelial regrowth, the very foundation of healthy tissue," Bell explained in a recent interview.
But perhaps the most compelling research involves silver nanoparticles in cancer treatment. Studies show that silver nanoparticles can selectively annihilate triple-negative breast cancer cells—a notoriously aggressive and hard-to-treat cancer—without harming healthy tissue. In a direct comparison with the chemotherapy drug cisplatin, silver nanoparticles were equally effective at killing cancer cells but spared surrounding healthy cells, a feat conventional oncology struggles to achieve.
Gold and Copper: The Unlikely Warriors Against Autoimmunity and Inflammation
Gold, long revered for its beauty and monetary value, has an emerging role in managing autoimmune disorders and chronic inflammation. Unlike its ionized form, which can be toxic, gold nanoparticles act as a stabilizing force in the immune system, potentially offering relief for conditions like rheumatoid arthritis.
Copper, meanwhile, is critical for vascular health and endothelial integrity. "I’ve prescribed Cuprum metallicum (homeopathic copper) for decades to treat varicose veins," Bell notes. Copper’s role in collagen formation also makes it essential for wound healing and tissue repair.
The Regulatory and Paradigm Shift Challenge
Despite mounting evidence, mainstream medicine remains resistant. "Doctors warn against copper and selenium supplements while prescribing toxic chemotherapies that kill healthy cells," Bell observes. "The scientific dogma surrounding metals needs to evolve."
Fortunately, the rise of holistic and decentralized medicine may accelerate acceptance. As research continues to validate these treatments, the next frontier could see metal-based therapies integrated into regenerative medicine, offering safer and more effective alternatives to today’s toxic protocols.
Conclusion: A Return to Ancient Wisdom
Historically, civilizations used gold, silver, and copper for their healing and conductive properties. Now, modern science is catching up—revealing why these metals were once considered sacred.
As Bell puts it: "Just because we were wrong about metals yesterday doesn’t mean we can’t be right about them tomorrow."
Are we on the verge of a medical renaissance? The answer may lie in the metals we once misunderstood.
Watch the full episode of the "Health Ranger Report" with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and Robert Scott Bell as they talk about the therapeutic uses of copper and emerging amazing cures.
https://www.brighteon.com/a3c5de7e-b600-4873-9c70-629aa0dfdbbe
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
New York’s “RFK Jr. Act” sparks backlash as medical freedom groups rally against adult vaccine tracking
Medical freedom advocates in New York are rallying against a controversial bill dubbed the “RFK Jr. Act,” which would mandate healthcare providers to report all adult vaccinations into a state database. Spearheaded by state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal as a direct rebuttal to U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s vaccine skepticism, the legislation has ignited fierce debate over data privacy, government oversight and public health. Opponents, including influential advocacy groups like Teachers for Choice and the Autism Action Network, plan to protest in Albany on May 14, warning the bill could lead to discrimination against unvaccinated individuals and set the stage for vaccine passports. Meanwhile, supporters argue the law is essential to track immunity trends amid fears of vaccine-resistant leadership at the federal level.
How the RFK Jr. Act got its name
The bill’s moniker is itself a point of contention. Hoylman-Sigal, a Manhattan Democrat, rebranded the legislation earlier this year to mock Kennedy’s vocal stance against mandated vaccines, particularly after his Senate confirmation as HHS secretary. The senator’s press release called Kennedy a “notorious vaccine skeptic” and tied the law to preventing disease resurgence as Kennedy seeks to roll back federal vaccine policies. Critics argue the name is a strategic distraction from the bill’s substance.
John Gilmore, executive director of the Autism Action Network, said Hoylman-Sigal’s rhetoric reflects a deeper alliance with pharmaceutical interests. “He’s Pharma’s biggest friend in the legislature,” Gilmore said, noting the bill could benefit vaccine manufacturers by streamlining data collection.
Opponents argue for privacy and freedom
Medical freedom advocates claim the bill’s opt-out provisions are inadequately publicized, leaving many unaware their vaccination records could be tracked unless they actively decline. Michael Kane, founder of Teachers for Choice, warned this could enable punitive measures against unvaccinated individuals. “[The database] would lay the groundwork for digital vaccine passports,” Kane said, citing concerns over civil liberties.
The May 14 rally, titled “Restore and Reclaim Our Jobs, Our Exemptions, Our Rights!”, aims to unite opposition to not only the RFK Jr. Act but also broader issues like reinstating New York’s religious vaccine exemptions for schoolchildren and protecting employment rights for unvaccinated workers. Attendees will hear from civil rights attorney Sujata Gibson and author Naomi Wolf, among others.
Kane highlighted past victories: since 2019, similar bills have failed after grassroots campaigns flipped public sentiment. “We’ve beaten every bill we focused on. This isn’t just about vaccines—it’s about who controls our bodies,” he said.
Supporters cite public health necessity
Proponents argue the registry is a logical extension of New York’s existing system for children under 19. Hygiene data collection, they say, ensures accurate records for patients receiving care from multiple providers and aids rapid responses to outbreaks. Hoylman-Sigal noted 28 states already maintain similar registries, calling the bill “common sense.”
“The reduction of vaccine-preventable diseases is one of our greatest public health achievements,” he stated in the press release, warning Kennedy’s federal influence could undermine Big Pharma's progress. The bill also aligns with efforts to counter 'misinformation', including Kennedy’s research linking vaccines to autism—ignoring the logic of developing scientific knowledge and the need for unbiased, open-minded review of 'the science' (also knows as zealotry).
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
As the debate continues, the fate of the COVID-19 vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule remains uncertain. However, the discussions reflect a significant shift in public health policy and a reevaluation of federal mandates under Kennedy's leadership. The decision could have far-reaching implications for public health, vaccine policy and the ongoing debate over the government’s role in managing public health crises.
Watch the video below that talks about RFK Jr. and the CDC vaccine schedule.
https://www.brighteon.com/4c1086dd-3d51-406d-8283-a70a608681a7
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Despite challenges, Humphries remains resolute. She praised movements like the Mennonites, who largely avoid vaccines, as examples of communities thriving without compulsory jabs. Humphries also hailed advances like Brighteon's AI engine Enoch, trained on vaccine-skeptical research to counter biased algorithms. She stated that people need non-woke AI engines such as Adams' Enoch as a resource to counter the woke AI engines.
Humphries' work underscores that improving public health requires more than needles – it needs transparency about the real drivers of disease decline. As debates over mandates rage, her message is clear: history shows that true progress stems from empowering individuals to make informed choices –free from corporate spin. The fight isn't just about vaccines; it's about reclaiming the narrative of health, one truth at a time.
Watch the full interview between Dr. Suzanne Humphries and the Health Ranger Mike Adams below.
https://www.brighteon.com/44428916-b40a-4880-87a8-97e45f28c785
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The silence of authorities
Despite these revelations, mainstream health agencies like the CDC and WHO dismiss concerns, claiming “no credible evidence.” “What’s incredible isn’t the science—the evidence is staring them in the face,” says McCairn. “It’s the willing blindness of institutions profiting from this experiment. They’re letting a generation get poisoned while chasing herd immunity.”
The data overload is relentless. Paper after peer-reviewed paper now connects spike RNA to amyloidogenesis, yet no regulatory body has recalled the vaccines, halted boosters, or funded independent prion safety studies. Meanwhile, embalmers worldwide report corpse arteries crammed with unnatural white gobs, autopsies yield “unidentified biomatter,” and hospitals see surging rates of accelerated dementia in vaccinated populations.
The stakes could not be higher. Without immediate action:
• Immune systems, overwhelmed by amyloid debris, will trigger autoimmune cascades.
• Brains, starved of oxygen and infiltrated by misfolded proteins, will succumb to silent dementias.
• Bloodlines, polluted with prion-friendly chemistry, threaten to seed future generations.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The rise of resistance and the elite’s fracturing grip
Resistance to the WEF’s agenda has surged as its vulnerabilities expose cracks in elite power. President Trump’s Second Term amplified skepticism toward globalism, with leaders like Bolsonaro and Modi openly rejecting WEF principles. Davos’ dwindling attendance — down 30% since 2019 — signals shifting geopolitical tides, as nations prioritize sovereignty over corporate diplomacy. Meanwhile, grassroots movements have galvanized globally: anti-CRT campaigns in U.S. schools, Kenya’s protests against digital currency, and India’s farmers opposing vaccine passports all reflect a revulsion against top-down governance.
Cyberpunk-inspired decentralization tools, like cryptocurrencies and mesh networks, enable bypassing systems dominated by WEF-aligned tech giants. Bitcoin’s 2023 surge, despite mainstream media hostility, showcased public distrust in centralized finance. Whistleblowers further erode elite credibility. Leaked emails revealing collaboration between WEF and governments to downplay pandemic origins, like the HC3 Global Health Security Initiative document, fueled conspiracy narratives and mainstream doubt. Even within WEF’s inner circles, dissent grows. Former board members like Lynn Stuart condemned social credit schemes as “dangerous irresponsibility,” exposing internal fissures.
Cultural shifts accelerate this backlash. Gen Z’s push for localized, community-based solutions — seen in permaculture movements and mutual aid networks — contrasts sharply with Schwab’s technocratic utopia. Historically, such resistance mirrored 1960s anti-colonial uprisings; today, it manifests in TikTok activism against Big Pharma and Ethereum’s “DAO” movements. Legal challenges, such as EU rulings banning biometric mass surveillance, signal institutional pushback previously unthinkable. As Schwab departs, the WEF’s waning influence underscores a broader truth: when institutions prioritize control over community, systems destabilize from within — a lesson from the Romanovs’ fall to today’s crypto rebellions.
The WEF’s unraveling represents more than corporate mismanagement; it is a societal vote against centralized tyranny. From TikTok’s algorithmic defiance to the Black Sea’s trade blocs rejecting WEF’s green mandates, humanity refuses to backtrack to history’s darker chapters. As Schwab’s legacy crumbles, the question remains: who truly holds society together? Not corporations or algorithms — but the people, anew in rebellion.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Another parallel: historical reliance on fleeting “miracle” cures, such as 19th-century mercury treatments and latter-day lobotomies, whose dangers were obscured by initial enthusiasm. Even the first polio vaccines caused great harm, maiming and killing children, before being pulled from the market and reformulated. mRNA’s swift ascent—unchallenged by long-term safety trials—fits this pattern. Despite current evidence, the WHO’s April agreement underscores a willingness to overlook risks for perceived short-term gains.
Broader implications: The immune system as battlefield
The study adds to mounting scrutiny of mRNA vaccines’ impact on immune function. By skewing responses toward IgG4—a antibody linked to autoimmune suppression and tolerance—booster programs could dampen the body’s ability to fight cancer. Mechanistically, the vaccine’s lipid nanoparticles deliver spike protein mRNA into cells, prompting indefinite spike production; this persistence may confuse immune surveillance, allowing tumor cells to evade attack.
Elevated IgG4 was also found in tumor micro-environments, particularly in cells expressing Foxp3—a marker for regulatory T-cells (Tregs) that dampen immune activity. This suggests vaccines may overstimulate immuno-suppressive pathways, creating a “sanctuary” for malignancies to proliferate. The implications are dire: a technology intended (in people's minds) to bolster immunity will, in vulnerable populations, do the opposite.
A reckoning is coming
The WHO’s refusal to recalibrate mRNA strategies amid such findings demands scrutiny. As the study’s authors note: “Long-term effects of mRNA vaccines on cancer prognosis remain pressing concerns.” This report is not an outlier but a data point in a growing chorus questioning safety.
For individuals, the study underscores the need for informed choice in medical interventions—especially for those with chronic conditions. Systemically, it calls for a reckoning with institutional biases that subordinate science to profit.
Pancreatic cancer’s typically grim prognosis is worsened by miscalculated public health policies. The study’s disclosure raises fundamental questions about trust in institutions and the ethics of deploying unproven biotech on mass scales.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Broader implications: The immune system as battlefield
The study adds to mounting scrutiny of mRNA vaccines’ impact on immune function. By skewing responses toward IgG4—a antibody linked to autoimmune suppression and tolerance—booster programs could dampen the body’s ability to fight cancer. Mechanistically, the vaccine’s lipid nanoparticles deliver spike protein mRNA into cells, prompting indefinite spike production; this persistence may confuse immune surveillance, allowing tumor cells to evade attack.
Elevated IgG4 was also found in tumor micro-environments, particularly in cells expressing Foxp3—a marker for regulatory T-cells (Tregs) that dampen immune activity. This suggests vaccines may overstimulate immuno-suppressive pathways, creating a “sanctuary” for malignancies to proliferate. The implications are dire: a technology intended (in people's minds) to bolster immunity will, in vulnerable populations, do the opposite.
A reckoning is coming
The WHO’s refusal to recalibrate mRNA strategies amid such findings demands scrutiny. As the study’s authors note: “Long-term effects of mRNA vaccines on cancer prognosis remain pressing concerns.” This report is not an outlier but a data point in a growing chorus questioning safety.
For individuals, the study underscores the need for informed choice in medical interventions—especially for those with chronic conditions. Systemically, it calls for a reckoning with institutional biases that subordinate science to profit.
Pancreatic cancer’s typically grim prognosis is worsened by miscalculated public health policies. The study’s disclosure raises fundamental questions about trust in institutions and the ethics of deploying unproven biotech on mass scales.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia