16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
RFK Jr. blasts The Guardian for falsely claiming THIMEROSAL in vaccines is “safe”
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has slammed The Guardian for falsely claiming that the mercury-based vaccine ingredient thimerosal is "safe" – despite scientific literature proving otherwise.
The head of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) took to X on Wednesday, June 25, to voice out his criticism of the British paper. "The Guardian is blind," Kennedy wrote, pointing out how the publication "did not bother to cite any peer-reviewed study" in a piece it published on June 20.
"Journalists don't seem to read those anymore," he continued. "Scientifically baseless repetition of empty industry assurances about thimerosal safety is yet another proof that journalists, and particularly science journalists, have now devolved into obsequious stenographers for Big Pharma."
The health secretary also debunked the claim that routine injections no longer contain thimerosal. "There are high bolus doses of mercury in flu shots," Kennedy asserted.
"CDC [the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] recommends [these flu vaccines] to pregnant women in any trimester of pregnancy, and as a routine vaccine for children at six months and in every year of life. Between conception and age 18, a compliant American child today could get a cumulative load of as much as 500 [micrograms] of ethylmercury from multidose flu shots."
CDC ignored mercury risks; will new panel finally act?
Despite assurances from agencies like the CDC that the compound is safe, independent research and historical admissions from regulators suggest otherwise. With Kennedy's advisory panel set to review thimerosal-containing influenza vaccines later this month, the question remains: Why does a known neurotoxin persist in medical formulations recommended for pregnant women and children?
Scientific literature paints a damning picture. A 2005 National Institutes of Health study found ethylmercury from vaccines crosses the blood-brain barrier, converts into highly toxic inorganic mercury, and lingers in the brain for years. Meanwhile, a 2017 CDC study correlated flu vaccines with a sevenfold increase in miscarriage risk – particularly when administered consecutively across seasons.
The controversy traces back decades. Thimerosal, nearly 50 percent ethylmercury by weight, was introduced in the 1930s as an antiseptic. It was later incorporated into vaccines to prevent contamination in multi-dose vials.
In 1998, the Food and Drug Administration banned thimerosal from over-the-counter products like topical antiseptics, yet paradoxically allowed its injection into infants. The CDC likewise continued endorsing mercury-laden flu shots for infants and expectant mothers.
Today, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) – now reshaped by Kennedy's appointments – will vote this month on whether to maintain its endorsement of the thimerosal-laden flu shots. As the panel confronts unresolved safety questions, the broader issue looms. When regulatory bodies dismiss independent science in favor of industry talking points, public trust erodes and the most vulnerable pay the price.
Listen to the Health Ranger Mike Adams discussing the World Mercury Project's $100,000 reward to anyone who can prove that "thimerosal is safe" – a bounty that remains unclaimed.
https://www.brighteon.com/00000000-0000-0000-0005-839505420001
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. halts U.S. funding for Gavi over vaccine safety concerns
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced this week that the United States will withdraw financial support from Gavi, the global vaccine alliance, until the organization rigorously addresses vaccine safety concerns. The decision, delivered during a Gavi pledging summit in Brussels, marks a watershed moment in the debate over mass vaccination campaigns and informed consent.
The U.S. has contributed approximately $8 billion to Gavi since 2001, making it one of the alliance’s largest donors. But Kennedy criticized the group for “neglect[ing] the key issue of vaccine safety” in its “zeal to promote universal vaccination.” His stance aligns with growing public skepticism over pharmaceutical industry influence and the need for independent safety reviews.
Kennedy’s message was unequivocal: Funding will resume only if Gavi adopts reforms that prioritize safety over ideology. “Consider the best science available, even when the science contradicts established paradigms,” he urged. The Trump administration’s 2026 budget request already excludes Gavi funding, while the Gates Foundation—a major Gavi partner—pledged $1.6 billion over five years.
Critics, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), framed the move as a threat to global health. Yet Kennedy’s position reflects a broader pushback against what many view as a captured regulatory system. “Business as usual is over,” he declared.
Gavi responded with a boilerplate commitment to “evidence-based” decisions, but its track record raises questions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the alliance partnered with the World Health Organization (WHO) to silence dissenting voices on vaccine risks, as noted in Kennedy’s speech. His administration has since withdrawn the U.S. from WHO, citing concerns over “totalitarian impulses” and corruption.
The price of ignoring safety
Kennedy specifically cited the diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccine, questioning Gavi’s funding of its rollout in developing nations. He referenced studies showing higher mortality rates among vaccinated girls. Similarly, observational data from Africa and South Asia has repeatedly flagged excess deaths post-DTP vaccination, in a signal that demands scrutiny—not dismissal. As Kennedy noted, Gavi has treated safety concerns “not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem.”
Medical charities like Doctors Without Borders condemned the funding halt, warning of “countless children [dying] from vaccine-preventable diseases.” But Kennedy’s stance underscores a fundamental principle: Vaccination without rigorous safety oversight is medical imperialism. Poor nations deserve more than band-aid solutions; they need clean water, nutrition, and healthcare systems free from corporate profiteering.
Rebuilding trust through science
The same day as Kennedy’s announcement, his newly appointed vaccine advisory panel convened to reassess CDC immunization schedules and review outdated vaccines, including Hepatitis B. The move signals a clean break from past administrations that rubber-stamped Big Pharma’s agenda.
RFK Jr.’s skepticism is rooted in decades of documented failures—from the rushed COVID-19 vaccines linked to myocarditis to the CDC’s suppression of data on autism and adjuvants. His demands for Gavi mirror reforms needed domestically: Ban direct-to-consumer drug ads, audit vaccine injury databases, and end mandates that strip parents of choice.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Obsessed with experimenting on children and ignoring the damage he’s done, Bill Gates pledges another $1.6 billion to GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is doubling down on its global vaccine crusade with a $1.6 billion pledge to GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance—despite a long track record of failed experiments, adverse reactions, and ethical violations. Instead of addressing poverty, malnutrition, and clean water—the root causes of disease—Gates continues to push injections as the only solution. While wealthy governments slash foreign aid, Gates fills the vacuum with his agenda: mass vaccination programs that have repeatedly harmed the poorest children. From tuberculosis trials gone wrong to deadly HPV vaccine scandals, Gates-funded experiments have left devastation in their wake. Now, critics demand accountability.
Key points:
• The Gates Foundation pledges another $1.6 billion to Gavi, expanding vaccine programs targeting the world’s poorest children.
• A recent Gates-funded TB vaccine trial infected 260 South African children—with vaccinated kids suffering more infections than the placebo group.
• Since 1990, the CDC’s VAERS system has recorded 2.6 million adverse events from vaccines—likely a fraction of the true toll.
• Gates previously funded gain-of-function research, engineering tuberculosis to grow uncontrollably—then later tested live TB bacteria on children.
• HPV vaccine trials in India, funded by Gates and run by PATH, left young girls with severe injuries and deaths while bypassing ethical consent.
• Gates’ obsession with vaccines persists despite mounting evidence of harm, sparking accusations of global depopulation motives.
Gates’ latest experiment: A TB vaccine disaster
The Gates Foundation’s latest venture—a tuberculosis vaccine trial in South Africa—ended in failure. Funded through the Gates Medical Research Institute, the study injected children with the live BCG Danish 1331 strain, derived from Mycobacterium bovis, a bacterium known to cause TB in humans. Shockingly, 260 children became infected, with higher rates in the vaccinated group than in those who received a placebo.
The New England Journal of Medicine (2025) reported: "Overall, after day 71, an initial QFT test conversion was observed in 135 participants (15.5%) in the BCG-vaccine group and 125 participants (14.7%) in the placebo group."
Even worse, researchers excluded infections occurring within the first 71 days, meaning children infected by the vaccine were not counted. Adverse reactions included ulcers, swelling, and surgical scars—all dismissed as “minor” by trial sponsors.
Bill Gates has long pushed vaccines as the solution to global health crises, but his experiments continue to cause harm instead of preventing it.
The HPV horror story: Gates-backed trials leave Indian girls injured and dead
In 2009, the Gates Foundation financed PATH, a nonprofit tied to pharmaceutical giants Merck and GlaxoSmithKline, to administer HPV vaccines to young girls in India, Uganda, Peru, and Vietnam. What followed was a scandal of coercion, forged consent forms, and deadly side effects.
Girls as young as nine suffered seizures, chronic fatigue, and paralysis. Some died suddenly—but PATH buried the data. An Indian parliamentary investigation later condemned the project, revealing:
• Parents were deceived, with consent forms fabricated.
• Victims came from low-income communities, targeted for their vulnerability.
• At least seven deaths were linked to the trials.
Despite this, Gates continues to push HPV vaccines worldwide, ignoring the devastation left behind.
Gates' gain-of-function nightmare: Engineering TB superbugs before injecting kids
Before the South African TB disaster, Gates funded gain-of-function research—genetically modifying tuberculosis to grow uncontrollably. A 2012 study, published in Tuberculosis, detailed how University of Texas scientists altered Mycobacterium tuberculosis, creating a mutant strain that bypassed natural regulatory controls.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon blasted the scheme, calling it “a self-appointed echo chamber masquerading as oversight.” Yet with states and insurers historically tied to ACIP’s approvals, the industry knows confusion itself could keep their mandates in place.
Fight for medical freedom has never been more critical
If Pharma succeeds, Americans will face two competing vaccine recommendation systems: one accountable to a panel of vaccine skeptics, the other controlled by corporate interests.
The fallout could mean:
• Continued school mandates for shots ACIP no longer approves. It's unclear whether state legislatures will ditch new ACIP recommendations and go with the heavy vaccine recommendations (92+) pushed by Pharma groups. The issue could eventually be framed as a "states rights issue." However, this issue should ultimately be left up to the parents of the child, as it is their children who are the ones being poisoned and sacrificed for the "greater good."
• Doctors will be pressured and indoctrinated to follow Pharma-funded guidelines, regardless of new ACIP recommendation. If so, doctors could risk federal noncompliance, pushing vaccines that have high risk and little benefit. The silver lining: this would weaken ACIP and the CDC's power altogether, and remove centralized control over individual healthcare decisions. This would give more power to patients as they pressure their doctors to take a more critical look at vaccines.
• A surge in state-by-state disparities could occur, with some politicians protecting Pharma monopolies and pushing every shot on kids, and other states following a more nuanced approach to vaccines, protecting kids from useless vaccine risks. This could ultimately lead to new legislation, strengthening vaccine exemptions for parents, raising awareness about existing vaccine exemptions, and allowing children to live unharmed by vaccines and the coercion that seeks to submit parents to an authoritarian medical police state.
The stakes are clear: without ACIP’s enforcement powers, the vaccine industry collapses. And with Kennedy’s new committee set to vote this week on RSV, flu, and COVID shots, Pharma’s desperation is showing. Vaccine industry insiders know that these shots are a fraud and have led to mass iatrogenic error, which is why they are mobilizing against their own governing body - ACIP - which they have controlled for decades.
For decades, they bullied families into submission. Now, their house of cards is falling—and they’re scrambling to rebuild it in secret. Will the new ACIP deliver on their promise to restore scientific integrity, or will the vaccine industry continue to have their way, whether their influence is inside or outside of official government recommendations?
The answers lies in parents getting educated about the topic, taking up their God-given rights, and making their own decisions, against all forms of coercion, deceptive recommendation, and unlawful mandate.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Juries litigating wrongful death cases are prone to side with authorities, because people are told to trust their doctors. To go against this subconscious belief, an entire jury would have to be deprogrammed; however, most people sitting on a jury have a hard time believing that doctors and hospitals would commit medical battery, and their negligence would lead to death, even when the jury is faced with overwhelming evidence and testimonies pointing to this sad reality. No one wants to believe that doctors will not be there for them when the time comes, but wrongful death and medical malpractice is a common occurrence and this harsh reality is difficult to accept for many until it happens to them or a family member.
A crack in the system—and a warning to the public
Despite the loss, the trial exposed critical flaws in hospital protocols that endanger patients nationwide. Attorney Warner Mendenhall described the case as lifting “the veil” on a system where “doctors and nurses followed orders that were wrong.” The unauthorized DNR, the aggressive sedation—these were not isolated mistakes but part of a broader, dangerous trend in modern medicine.
Grace’s case also highlights the erosion of informed consent. As Mendenhall warned, patients “sign their rights away” upon entering a hospital, often without realizing the risks. The trial revealed that hospitals operate under a cloak of secrecy, keeping families in the dark about treatments, medications, and life-or-death decisions.
Scott Schara’s final warning was dire: “The jury ruled that no consent is required in a hospital, and a doctor can unilaterally place a DNR on a patient without consent, without a witness, without a signature, and without a bracelet. This should scare anyone with ears to hear.”
The Schara family’s fight is far from over. Legal options remain, and their story continues to resonate with those who recognize the dangers of unchecked medical authority. Grace’s death may have been in vain in the eyes of the court, but for those willing to listen, her legacy is a rallying cry for medical transparency, awareness of medical error and wrongful death in hospitals, accountability, and the fundamental right to bodily autonomy.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Malhotra: White House mulling REMOVAL of mRNA COVID-19 injections from the market
The Trump White House is considering the removal of the messenger RNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines from the market entirely, cardiologist Dr. Assem Malhotra has revealed.
Malhotra, disclosed this development in an interview with Dr. John Campbell posted Thursday, June 19. The cardiologist, who was appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the chief medical advisor to the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative, cited conversations he had with insiders from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.
"My conversations, as well, with people in the White House … without naming people, is … there is no reason why this COVID-19 vaccine should not be completely pulled from the market," Malhotra told Campbell. "It's just a question of time. They're going through due diligence and whatever way they see fit."
The chief medical advisor for MAHA also suggested that while President Donald Trump may need convincing, Kennedy's leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) could accelerate the process. This development marks a seismic shift in U.S. public health policy, fueled by mounting evidence of vaccine-related injuries and growing skepticism toward pharmaceutical influence.
Trump's Operation Warp Speed during his first term – once hailed as a triumph of rapid vaccine development – now faces scrutiny as real-world data reveals potential harms. Malhotra's research, including a peer-reviewed paper documenting cardiovascular risks, has gained traction globally, influencing policies in Denmark and Florida. His personal tragedy – his father's fatal cardiac arrest post-vaccination – has fueled his advocacy for a moratorium on mRNA shots.
Malhotra: MAHA impossible without addressing vaccine injuries
In May, the HHS said it would withdraw recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women and healthy children – according to a report by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) at the time. The department made good on this promise later that month.
Malhotra's appointment as MAHA's chief medical advisor came amid this announcement; the cardiologist was among the supporters who lauded the move. In a post on X, Malhotra recounted how "the first person to call me and thank me for my courage after I called for a suspension of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in 2022" was Kennedy, now health secretary.
In a separate post on X, the cardiologist praised the decision: "It's what you've been waiting for. There is overwhelming evidence to call for a moratorium on the mRNA COVID-19 jabs and heal the vaccine injured."
Malhotra told the Daily Mail that he wants to see the use of these mRNA injections paused until a comprehensive investigation is conducted. "It's very clear to me that perhaps this is the most important issue that has galvanized MAHA and helped elect President Trump," he said.
"There is a pandemic of the vaccine injured. We can't MAHA if we don't address this."
Critics, however, warned that the HHS's policy shift could reduce vaccination rates further, particularly among vulnerable groups. Vaccine advocate Richard Hughes lamented to the WSJ that the move would "have a behavioral impact on whether people choose to get vaccinated." He also expressed concern that removing recommendations might discourage immunocompromised individuals from seeking protection.
But with Malhotra's revelations signaling a harder stance against pharmaceutical influence, the coming months may see further restrictions on COVID-19 vaccines – a move that could reshape public health for years to come. For millions of Americans skeptical of vaccine mandates, this shift represents a long-awaited reckoning with the risks of rushed medical interventions.
Watch Dr. Aseem Malhotra explaining to Jan Jekielek of the Epoch Times why the COVID-19 vaccines are causing cardiac injury in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/d7f2bb0c-dc9a-4278-b18a-0919403f0d36
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Global VACCINE DEBATE intensifies as Japan releases study on 18,000 Covid-vaxxed sheeple who show HIGH DEATH RISK shortly after clot shot injections
Natural health advocates warned the world a hundred times over NOT to get injected with the experimental Covid mRNA gene-mutating jabs, but the vaccine cult just wouldn't listen. Now, millions of jabbed sheeple around the globe are paying the ultimate price - their lives. Yes, 18 million vaccinated Japanese citizens were all part of a study to see if multiple Covid jabs actually lead to early death, and come to found out, they do. Plus, the "fully unvaccinated" humans who resisted the biological warfare tyranny of mass-experimentation by injection did NOT suffer these early deaths, that included vaccinated folks dying just 3 to 4 months after getting the mRNA stabs. Here's the scoop:
• Higher Doses Linked to Increased Mortality: A Japanese study tracking 18 million vaccinated citizens found that all-cause mortality spiked 3–4 months post-vaccination, with each additional dose accelerating the risk. Unvaccinated individuals showed no comparable trend.
• Whistleblower Warnings: Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, a Tokyo University researcher, stated, “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die,” citing toxicity overlap from repeated vaccinations. Independent journalists and scientists publicized the data after government inaction.
• Global Parallels: The findings align with international concerns, including Dr. Peter McCullough’s condemnation of “unacceptable” deaths and comparisons to the halted 1976 swine flu vaccine program (stopped after 25 deaths).
• Demands for Transparency: The study fuels calls for independent vaccine safety reviews, especially for younger adults, as earlier Japanese reports suggested the shots could be seven times deadlier than COVID-19 for some demographics.
Japanese Study of 18 Million Vaccinated Citizens Finds Higher Death Risk With More COVID Doses
A newly released database tracking 18 million vaccinated Japanese citizens has raised urgent concerns after researchers found a significant increase in mortality risk following multiple COVID-19 vaccine doses. The findings, presented on June 15 by a coalition of scientists, journalists, and lawmakers, suggest that deaths spiked sharply three to four months after vaccination—a trend absent in unvaccinated individuals. The data, initially withheld by the government, has reignited global debates over vaccine safety and informed consent.
Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, vice director of the Research Center for RNA Science at Tokyo University of Science, delivered a stark warning: “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.” The study revealed that deaths surged between 90 and 120 days post-vaccination, with each additional dose accelerating the timeline. “If the vaccine had no toxicity or didn’t induce death, there wouldn’t be a peak,” Murakami stated.
The data, compiled independently after government inaction, showed no comparable mortality spike among unvaccinated individuals. Journalist Masako Ganaha, who helped publicize the findings, wrote on X: “If the government won’t do it, then the people should investigate the mass deaths of Japanese people!”
The Japanese findings mirror warnings from international experts, including Dr. Peter McCullough, who called the deaths “absolutely unacceptable.” The study also draws parallels to the 1976 U.S. swine flu vaccine program, halted after just 25 deaths and 550 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome—despite only 25% of the population being vaccinated. Critics argue that the scale of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, coupled with emerging data, warrants similar scrutiny.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Watch Calley Means explaining how Ozempic causes stomach paralysis.
https://www.brighteon.com/c5bbfd8f-6990-4aa2-9138-5c05c82169e0
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Sen. Tim Sheehy to introduce bill granting BACK PAY to troops impacted by COVID-19 vaccine mandate
Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-MT) is set to introduce legislation that will compensate U.S. service members who were discharged or penalized under the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine mandate of former President Joe Biden.
The bill, titled the Restoring Military Pay and Honor Act, seeks to provide back pay and restore benefits to an estimated 100,000 service members who lost pay, retirement credit or were discharged for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine while the mandate was in effect.
According to Sheehy's office, approximately 8,500 active-duty service members were separated for noncompliance with the vaccine policy. The Army Reserve and National Guard reportedly lost over 60,000 personnel, and thousands more were affected in various ways including denial of pay, benefits and advancement opportunities.
While the mandate was repealed in the fiscal year 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and later deemed unconstitutional by federal courts, many discharged troops have yet to receive reinstatement or financial redress. The proposed legislation would establish an opt-in claims process under the Military Pay Act, allowing eligible former service members to apply for back pay and benefits. Eligibility criteria would be defined in the bill, which is expected to face partisan scrutiny as it moves through Congress.
"Under the Biden administration, thousands of American warfighters were unceremoniously – and without due process – discharged from the military for refusing to comply with Joe Biden's vaccine mandate. This unacceptable action by the last administration robbed servicemembers of the pay and benefits they rightfully earned in service to our country," the senator said.
"My legislation will right this wrong by building on President Donald Trump's Executive Order to reinstate those service members, ensuring we fulfill our government's sacred obligations to the men and women who put their lives on the line in defense of our freedoms."
Sheehy's bill codifies Trump EO to reinstate discharged troops
In January, shortly after Trump took office, he signed an executive order (EO) that would reinstate U.S. military personnel who were discharged for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine during the former administration.
At the time, Trump billed the EO as a rectification of the "injustice" carried out under Biden. It directs the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to reinstate vaccine-refusing troops and provide them with full back pay.
Trump called for "full back pay, benefits, bonus payments or compensation" for affected individuals in the EO. But the order offers no details on how that would be administered, who qualifies, whether obligations will be attached or how it would be funded.
It also notes that any payouts would be "subject to the availability of appropriations." This effectively places the burden on Congress to allocate money that the executive branch does not have the authority to distribute on its own.
The order also allows former troops to submit a sworn statement claiming they voluntarily left due to the vaccine requirement and be reinstated with full rank and pay. Now, Sheehy's legislation would give concrete form to Trump's executive order by creating a defined path for reinstatement and compensation.
Watch Army Lt. Col. Theresa Long exposing the Nuremberg Code violations in the military's COVID-19 vaccine mandate in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/bce12565-735c-45ad-817e-8418842d3ee3
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Reaction and next steps: A shift toward transparency in science
Industry groups responded mixedly. The Biotechnology Innovation Organization stated, “Ethical research must proceed safely,” while emphasizing that most trials comply with consent rules. Patients’ advocates praised the move. “No one should have foreign labs altering their cells without knowing it,” said Megan Sun, CEO of the Center for Patient Autonomy.
The FDA and NIH will now audit trial sponsors, requiring them to file revised protocols by July 31. Those failing to meet transparency criteria face deactivation. “The science we permit must first prioritize the safety and sovereignty of the American people,” Dr. Makary declared.
A new era of oversight for America’s research frontier
The FDA’s bold move underscores a growing recognition: Biomedical innovation cannot overlook security and consent. With federal agencies harmonizing oversight, the incident signals not just closure of a single loophole but a recommitment to safeguarding American data in an era of escalating global competition. As Dr. Bhattacharya noted, “Science without oversight isn’t progress — it’s peril.” The agency’s actions, though delayed, aim to ensure that U.S. research retains public trust and global leadership.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Alberta ends free COVID-19 vaccines, angering province’s liberal politicians
The government of Canada's Alberta province under the United Conservative Party (UCP) has announced that Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines will no longer be free of charge for most residents starting this fall.
In a press release Friday, June 13, the provincial government said those who wish to avail of the COVID-19 injections but do not fall under certain priority groups will "be required to cover the full costs of the vaccine." The decision to shift the financial burden onto individuals who choose to get the shots was framed as a cost-saving measure to reduce waste.
Under the new system, residents must pre-order vaccines at a cost of approximately CA$110 ($80.62) per dose. High-risk groups, including seniors in care facilities and immunocompromised individuals, can still get the vaccine at no cost. The phased rollout prioritizes vulnerable populations before expanding availability to the general public, who will pay out of pocket.
The decision has nevertheless drawn sharp criticism from left-leaning opponents who argue it undermines public health equity. Former Alberta Deputy Premier Sarah Hoffman of the New Democratic Party condemned the "cruel" policy and accused the UCP of accelerating healthcare privatization. According to her, charging for vaccines creates a financial barrier for low-income Albertans.
Alberta's controversial vaccine shift: Fiscal prudence or public health risk?
The provincial government countered that the change aligns with fiscal responsibility. Alberta Health Minister Adriana LaGrange defended the move, citing excessive waste in previous vaccination campaigns.
"In previous years, we've seen significant vaccine wastage," LaGrange stated. Fifty-four percent of the province's COVID-19 doses, worth an estimated CA$135 million ($98.95 million), were discarded in the 2023-2024 fiscal year.
The controversy echoes broader tensions over pandemic management. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has previously questioned vaccine mandates for children, citing international precedents in Denmark and Sweden, where routine COVID-19 vaccination for healthy minors was halted.
The shift coincides with diverging global health advisories. While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration no longer recommends routine COVID vaccines for pregnant women and young children, Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization continues to endorse them. Alberta's policy also follows a provincial task force report urging transparency about vaccine risks and caution for healthy youth, a stance that has drawn ire from advocates of vaccine mandates.
As Alberta prepares for the fall rollout, the debate underscores enduring divisions over pandemic lessons. Proponents of the new policy frame it as a pragmatic step toward normalizing COVID-19 management, while critics warn it risks eroding trust in public health.
With other provinces watching closely, Alberta's experiment may set a precedent for how governments balance fiscal restraint with equitable healthcare access in a post-pandemic world. The outcome will hinge on whether the targeted approach curbs waste without exacerbating health disparities, a challenge that reflects the complex legacy of COVID-19 policies.
Watch this NFSC News report about Alberta Premier Danielle Smith admitting that the unvaccinated were right about the COVID-19 injections.
https://www.brighteon.com/37357fd7-77a3-4ae8-bfbb-28169b9e3428
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
AstraZeneca’s deadly deception: Heart drug Brilinta exposed as ineffective, increasing heart attack risks
Millions of vulnerable heart patients have been betrayed by AstraZeneca, a pharmaceutical giant with a disturbing track record of manipulating clinical trial data to push dangerous drugs onto an unsuspecting public. Now, top medical experts are sounding the alarm over Brilinta (ticagrelor), a blood-thinning drug falsely marketed as a lifesaver for acute coronary syndrome. Shockingly, mounting evidence reveals that AstraZeneca misreported safety data, concealing the drug’s alarming inefficacy—and even its potential to increase heart attack risks. This isn’t just corporate negligence; it’s a calculated deception that has put millions of lives at stake while lining the pockets of Big Pharma executives.
Key points:
• AstraZeneca’s Brilinta, approved in 2011, was touted as a breakthrough for preventing fatal heart attacks—but experts now say trial data was "seriously misreported."
• The BMJ investigation found key trial results were inaccurately reported, with nearly a quarter of critical platelet readings omitted from FDA submissions.
• Some patients in trials experienced increased platelet aggregation—the exact opposite of what Brilinta is supposed to prevent—raising fears the drug may worsen clotting risks.
• Despite red flags, AstraZeneca continues to defend the drug, while regulators turn a blind eye to the mounting evidence of fraud.
• Over 45,000 NHS prescriptions are filled monthly for Brilinta, meaning countless patients are unknowingly taking a drug that may do more harm than good.
• Natural alternatives - like nattokinase, hawthorne, pomegranate, and garlic offer better protection.
A history of deception: AstraZeneca’s deadly track record
This isn’t the first time AstraZeneca has been caught manipulating data to push a dangerous drug. The company’s COVID-19 vaccine was linked to deadly blood clots, with government reports confirming 437 cases and 78 deaths in the UK alone. The same story unfolded with their ovarian cancer drug and psyche meds for children. Now, history repeats itself as Brilinta faces similar scrutiny.
Dr. Victor Serebruany, a cardiovascular pharmacology expert at Johns Hopkins University, has warned for over a decade that something was "obviously wrong" with Brilinta’s trial data. "If doctors had known what happened in these trials, they would never have started using ticagrelor," he told The BMJ. Yet, AstraZeneca—backed by complicit regulators—brushed aside concerns, prioritizing profits over patient safety.
The smoking gun: Missing data and manipulated results
The BMJ’s investigation uncovered damning evidence that AstraZeneca’s clinical trials excluded critical platelet readings that would have exposed Brilinta’s flaws. In one trial, over 60 out of 282 machine readings were mysteriously omitted from FDA submissions—readings that showed higher platelet activity, suggesting the drug failed to prevent clotting as promised.
Even more alarming, some patients experienced dramatic increases in platelet aggregation—essentially, their blood thickened dangerously, raising their risk of heart attacks and strokes. Yet, these findings were buried, allowing Brilinta to sail through approval while putting millions at risk.
The FDA and UK’s MHRA have long been accused of rubber-stamping dangerous drugs under pressure from pharmaceutical lobbyists. Brilinta’s approval followed the same playbook: questionable data, ignored warnings, and a rush to market. Now, with lives on the line, regulators remain eerily silent.
Meanwhile, AstraZeneca continues to gaslight the public, insisting, "We are confident in the integrity of the trials." But confidence doesn’t erase the bodies piling up—patients who trusted a system rigged against them.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
RFK Jr.’s revamped CDC panel votes on mercury-laced vaccine preservative amid autism concerns
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), now dominated by appointees of Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., will convene on June 25-26 to vote on influenza vaccines containing thimerosal, a controversial mercury-based preservative. This marks the first meeting of the newly reconstituted panel, which replaced its 17 former members with eight new appointees, many of whom share Kennedy’s skepticism toward mainstream vaccine safety assurances. The vote lands at the intersection of scientific consensus and public advocacy, reigniting a decades-old debate over the chemical’s potential neurological risks for children.
Kennedy, who has written that thimerosal “likely caused autism” and should be banned, emphasized in a statement the need to “restore public trust in vaccines” by demanding “gold-standard science” before any policy decisions. Critics, however, warn that revisiting an issue previously settled by federal courts and peer-reviewed research could undermine confidence in immunizations. The outcome of this vote may shape not only thimerosal’s future in vaccines but also the broader direction of Kennedy’s tenure as a guardian of health freedom versus a skeptic of established medicine.
The Kennedy blueprint: Shaking up vaccine policy
After firing all 17 prior ACIP members, Kennedy introduced eight new appointees, including Dr. Robert Malone, a controversial mRNA pioneer whose contributions to vaccine technology have drawn admiration and scrutiny. The panel’s mandate, Kennedy insists, is to prioritize transparency and accountability, rejecting prior recommendations he perceives as compromised. “They’ve repopulated ACIP with fresh, independent minds committed to rigor,” wrote MAHA PAC, a conservative advocacy group backing Kennedy’s reforms.
The June meeting agenda includes a presentation on thimerosal and votes on thimerosal-containing influenza vaccines. Kennedy’s book Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak (2014) argues that the preservative is “immensely toxic to brain tissue,” citing studies he claims underscore its neurotoxicity. Yet the FDA and CDC have repeatedly dismissed such claims, citing “over 20 years of scientific evidence” showing no safety concerns with thimerosal in vaccines, particularly in low concentrations.
The science, the skepticism and the stakes for public trust
Thimerosal, which contains ethylmercury, has been a lightning rod since the late 1990s, when fears of autism links sparked its removal from childhood vaccines. The FDA and CDC worked with manufacturers to phase it out of pediatric vaccines by 2001, though it remains in some multi-dose flu shots for adults. Kennedy’s appointment of anti-thimerosal advocates to the ACIP risks reopening wounds in the scientific community.
Dr. Jeremy Faust, editor-in-chief of MedPage Today, warns that elevating “debunked myths” could erode public trust in vaccines overall. “This politicizes a process that should be about facts alone,” he said. Kennedy counters that these discussions are overdue: “American parents deserve answers—not deflection.”
The vote’s implications stretch beyond thimerosal. The panel will also review policies on RSV and COVID-19 vaccines, with Kennedy signaling openness to revisiting past mandates. His earlier unilateral change to CDC’s guidance on maternal and pediatric mRNA vaccinations bypassed the ACIP, drawing sharp criticism. This meeting will test whether scientific dissent can coexist with bureaucratic tradition.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
APPENDIX CANCER surges among millennials: Why doctors are missing the signs
Actor Adan Canto, best known for his roles in "X-Men" and "The Cleaning Lady," died at 42 from appendix cancer in January 2024. His tragic and early death exposed a disturbing medical trend: a sharp rise in appendiceal cancer among younger adults.
A new study published June 10 in the Annals of Internal Medicine (AIM) reveals that rates of this rare but aggressive disease have quadrupled in older millennials compared to their grandparents' generation. Yet, despite the alarming increase, most cases go undiagnosed until it's too late – raising urgent questions about why modern medicine is failing to catch it sooner.
For decades, appendix cancer was considered a medical oddity. This cancer was so rare that many doctors never encountered it in their careers. Nevertheless, the AIM study – which analyzed nearly 5,000 cases from 1975 to 2019 – found that adults born in the mid-1980s are four times more likely to develop the disease than those born in the 1940s.
While the total number of cases remains small -- about 3,000 Americans annually -- the speed of the increase is unprecedented. Unlike most cancers, which rise by one to two percent per year, appendix cancer is growing at nearly four percent annually. And the hardest-hit group? Adults under 50.
Appendix cancer: A disease that hides in plain sight
The appendix, a small pouch attached to the large intestine, was long dismissed as a useless evolutionary relic. But recent research suggests it may play a role in gut immunity. Unfortunately, it's also prone to tumors, and doctors still don't know why they're becoming more common in younger people.
Researchers suspect a "birth cohort effect," meaning shared environmental or lifestyle factors among those born in the same era. Possible culprits include:
• Dietary changes (processed foods, artificial additives)
• Microbiome disruption (antibiotics, gut health decline)
• Environmental toxins (plastics, pollutants)
• Genetic mutations (about 10 percent of cases have hereditary links)
But unlike colon cancer, which has clear screening protocols, appendix cancer has no early detection methods. Most cases are found by accident, often during emergency surgery for appendicitis.
But the biggest challenge with appendix cancer is that symptoms mimic common digestive issues. Patients report persistent abdominal pain, bloating, pelvic discomfort and unexplained weight loss. By the time cancer is confirmed, it has often spread – making treatment more challenging.
Worse, younger patients today are less likely to have their appendix removed at all. Many appendicitis cases are now treated with antibiotics instead of surgery, which can mask tumors lurking inside.
This isn't just about the appendix. The surge mirrors a troubling rise in other early-onset gastrointestinal cancers – colorectal, stomach and pancreatic – among adults under 50.
Some experts blame modern diets, sedentary lifestyles, or even childhood exposures to toxins. But without more research, the exact cause remains a mystery.
For now, awareness is key. Doctors must take persistent symptoms seriously, especially in younger patients. Advocacy groups like the Appendiceal Cancer Consortium are pushing for more research into risk factors and early detection tools.
If pain or bloating lingers for weeks, demand further testing. In medicine, rare doesn't mean impossible.
Canto's death was a wake-up call. Appendix cancer is still rare, but its rapid rise in millennials signals a deeper shift in public health. Until science catches up, vigilance – and a refusal to dismiss unexplained pain – could save lives.
Watch this video about certain cancers striking more young adults.
https://www.brighteon.com/2a277c36-7cdc-45db-ac52-253a34a2f9ce
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA under fire as lawsuit exposes systemic transparency failures in generic drug safety
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) faces mounting scrutiny after ProPublica sued the agency in 2024 for refusing to disclose safety records of generic drugs produced in overseas factories plagued by violations. The lawsuit, ongoing in New York’s federal court, reveals a systemic failure in transparency, leaving millions of American consumers in the dark about potential risks. As generic drugs make up 90% of prescriptions, ProPublica’s investigation uncovers a pattern of FDA leniency toward manufacturers — even after unsafe factories tied to life-threatening outbreaks were flagged.
The FDA’s opaque approval process threatens public trust
ProPublica’s records request aimed to identify generic drugs linked to unsafe manufacturing facilities, particularly in India. The FDA denied expedited access, claiming ProPublica had not proven a “compelling need,” despite evidence of hazardous conditions. As of 2025, inspection reports still redact drug names, leaving doctors, pharmacists and policy makers without critical information.
The agency’s stance contrasts starkly with its 2023 recall of Philips Respironics breathing machines after lawsuits forced transparency. Yet for generic drugs, gaps persist. ProPublica alleges the FDA approved over 150 medications from non-compliant factories via “little-known exemptions,” despite evidence of contaminated batches or falsified testing.
Dr. Jack Browning, ProPublica’s legal counsel, emphasized, “Safety violations must not be swept under the rug as offshore manufacturing expands.” The critique echoes concerns raised by whistleblowers, including a 2005 FDA advisory board’s compromised review of Vioxx-class drugs, where panel members had ties to pharmaceutical firms.
A legacy of fraud and cover-ups
Systemic issues are not new. In 2005, the FDA allowed painkillers like Celebrex and Vioxx to stay on the market despite evidence of cardiovascular risks. A decade later, third-party contract research organizations (CROs)—responsible for verifying bioequivalence of generics—began revealing shocking fraud.
In 2013, Cetero Research, a Houston-based CRO, fabricated clinical trial data, prompting the EU to ban 100+ drugs based on its findings. The FDA, however, avoided recalling questionable generics, instead assigning “BX” ratings, which deem products non-interchangeable but still legal to sell. Critics likened the approach to “Alice in Wonderland”—a bureaucratic evasion leaving pharmacists to sort out risks.
Recent scandals have intensified scrutiny. In 2023, a toxic antiseptic mixture in Indian-manufactured eye drops killed four individuals and blinded others. The FDA’s delayed response highlighted reactive over proactive oversight.
CROs and foreign factories: Where the risks converge
The FDA relies heavily on CROs and overseas manufacturers, 80% of which are based in India. Yet these partners have been repeatedly cited for data manipulation. In 2024, the FDA flagged Synapse Labs Pvt. Ltd. for falsified bioequivalence studies, potentially tainting hundreds of generic drugs, including Viagra and Cialis. Despite this, the FDA—citing confidentiality—refused to name affected medications, mirroring its 2021 handling of data fraud from Synchron and Panexcell, also Indian firms.
Natural News founder Mike Adams has long argued the FDA’s mission is compromised, citing its “Do it right the first time” slogan as hypocritical. “The FDA must reform—or collapse,” he asserts, pointing to the agency’s revolving door with pharmaceutical executives.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The Gates Foundation’s $10 billion “decade of vaccines” pledge for developing nations now faces scrutiny. Would these funds save more lives if directed toward nutrition and sanitation? Kennedy’s defunding of Gavi challenges the philanthropic-industrial complex to prove its priorities align with human health, not profit.
RFK Jr.’s decision to withhold U.S. funding from Gavi isn’t anti-vaccine; it’s pro-science. By demanding transparent risk-benefit analyses, he champions the principle that medicine must serve patients, not power. As the global health establishment scrambles to demonize critics, the onus is on Gavi to “re-earn the public trust.” Until then, American taxpayers will no longer bankroll its unchecked experimentation on the world’s most vulnerable.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Yet just years later, Gates moved to human trials, injecting children with a live TB-related bacteria. Was this incompetence—or something darker? Critics warn that Gates’ obsession with vaccines conceals a depopulation agenda, particularly after his infamous 2010 TED Talk claim:
"If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower [the world population] by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent."
That admission raises grave questions. Why fund research making diseases more dangerous—then inject children with those same pathogens?
A legacy of harm disguised as philanthropy
Bill Gates is not a doctor. He has no formal medical training. Yet through his foundation, he wields unprecedented influence over global health—funding dangerous experiments, dismissing injuries, and overriding ethical safeguards.
While GAVI boasts of “1.1 billion vaccinated children,” the true cost remains hidden: mutated TB strains, injured girls in India, and a regulatory system that protects pharmaceutical profits over children’s lives.
Bill Gates’ obsession with controlling people’s healthcare decisions and pushing new vaccines through his organization GAVI is openly diabolical at this point. Not only have his experiments caused severe health issues in young girls in India (HPV vaccines), and not only have tuberculosis vaccine experiments caused more sickness than before and mutant strains of TB, but he also was insistent in his push to vaccinate every man woman and child with COVID vaccines. This ultimately led to mass medical error and death. Today, Bill Gates is still pushing and financing global vaccine experiments, while knowing that they cause harm.
Bill Gates should be restrained from practicing medicine, throwing large sums of money into vaccine projects, and carrying out experiments on global populations. He should be held to account for repeatedly refusing to acknowledge the devastation his vaccine-obsessive organizations cause. If Gates truly cared about global health, he would invest in clean water, access to nutrition, treatments for infectious disease, herbal medicine production, and sustainable farming—not endless vaccines that perpetuate sickness through mutations and adverse events. As the death toll rises, one thing becomes clear: Gates must be stopped before his next experiment claims more innocent lives.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
CDC report insists there’s NO LINK between thimerosal in vaccines and autism
Ahead of a key meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) vaccine advisory panel, a report from the public health agency claimed that there is no link between thimerosal in vaccines and autism.
The CDC released an updated report Tuesday, June 24, about the issue. The report insisted that there is no credible evidence supporting a connection between the mercury-based preservative thimerosal and autism. It cited scientific literature to back up the false claim of thimerosal's safety – despite the fact that mercury is a known neurotoxin.
Thimerosal, a preservative historically used in multidose vaccine vials to prevent bacterial contamination, was supposedly removed from most childhood vaccines in the U.S. since the early 2000s. But it remains in about four percent of flu shots – primarily in multidose formulations. Globally, thimerosal is still widely used due to its cost-effectiveness.
The release of the CDC report came just days before a scheduled presentation by vaccine safety advocate Lyn Redwood. The president emerita of the health freedom group Children's Health Defense (CHD) is set to present findings linking thimerosal to neurodevelopmental disorders at the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting on June 25 and 26.
Her appearance before ACIP has raised alarms among public health experts, particularly given Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s recent overhaul of the panel. Several new members like Dr. Martin Kulldorff – co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration opposing Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) lockdowns – have previously questioned mainstream vaccine guidance.
The fight against thimerosal in vaccines
A nurse practitioner by profession, Redwood is among the so-called "mercury moms" who pushed for Kennedy to get involved with defending children from this neurotoxin in vaccines. In early June, she also spoke about thimerosal during CHD's "The Autism Cover-Up – Simpsonwood Scandal: 25 Years of Fraud & Corruption" event.
During the 2024-2025 flu season, the CDC claimed 96 percent of U.S. influenza vaccines were thimerosal-free. Pediatrician Dr. Sean O'Leary, a liaison to ACIP for the American Academy of Pediatrics, blindly defended the mercury-based vaccine ingredient. "Thimerosal has been demonstrated to be safe," he remarked.
Meanwhile, UC Law San Francisco legal scholar Dorit Reiss criticized the ACIP's inclusion of Redwood. "She has a clear history of bias and likely conflicts of interest," Reiss said of the vaccine safety advocate.
Despite the smears by the mainstream medical establishment, Redwood and her allies have actual experiences to back up their claims. In 1999, she asserted that her son's autism resulted from mercury exposure via vaccines. Others like "Warrior Mom" Tracy Slepcevic and actress and model Jenny McCarthy also attest to how the vaccines negatively harmed their children.
Watch this video that discusses thimerosal and autism.
https://www.brighteon.com/5adc728a-cbb7-4f67-90bd-15ebb6ddbbaf
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
How the Vaccine Industry is plotting to bypass ACIP and keep pushing endless vaccines on Americans
The vaccine industry is scrambling to protect its lucrative grip on American medicine, now that their enforcement arm—the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)—is being dismantled under new leadership. Facing the collapse of their vaccine mandates and automatic funding streams, pharmaceutical giants and their allies are conspiring to create a shadow system that bypasses government oversight entirely, according to a bombshell report from The Washington Post. With millions at stake, they’re moving fast to lock in recommendations that keep Americans dependent on an endless barrage of shots—no matter the cost to freedom, transparency, or public health.
Key points:
• A secretive group of vaccine manufacturers, medical associations, and industry-backed insiders is designing a private vaccine recommendation system to replace ACIP after its members were ousted for conflicts of interest.
• ACIP’s recommendations dictate insurance coverage, school mandates, and federal funding—making it the linchpin of Big Pharma’s vaccine empire. If sidelined, the industry loses its coercive power.
• Groups like the AAP and ACOG—already funded by Merck, Pfizer, and Sanofi—are positioned to push Pharma-friendly guidelines, despite zero independent review.
• Former ACIP members with deep ties to Merck and other companies are openly urging doctors to ignore new ACIP guidance, risking legal noncompliance for physicians who follow them.
The ACIP takedown and Big Pharma’s desperate counterstrike
For decades, the ACIP operated as a rubber stamp for vaccine manufacturers, with members frequently caught accepting consulting fees from Merck, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline while voting to recommend their products. Its recommendations became binding policy, forcing schools to mandate shots, insurers to cover them, and pharmacies to administer them. But when HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. disbanded the committee last month—citing glaring conflicts of interest—Big Pharma’s grip on the system began to unravel.
Now, an “extraordinary” coalition of industry players is racing to create what James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., calls a “corporation-backed, corporation-friendly committee” to replace ACIP. Internal discussions, leaked to The Post, reveal plans to let medical associations—already swimming in Pharma cash—take over vaccine recommendations, while states and pharmacies cut deals directly with manufacturers. Their goal is to preserve vaccine mandates for schools and protect automatic funding even if ACIP stops green-lighting every shot on the schedule.
Helen Chu, a recently ousted ACIP member who took money from Merck, exemplifies the corruption at play. In MedPage Today, she urged physicians to “turn away” from ACIP’s guidelines—a stunning admission that the old guard would rather sabotage oversight than lose their Pharma paymasters. Merck, her former benefactor, produces Gardasil, MMR, and chickenpox vaccines—all previously mandated under ACIP’s recommendations.
The “Vaccine Integrity Project”: A front for corporate interests
The shadow group is being coordinated through the University of Minnesota’s Vaccine Integrity Project, funded by billionaire Christy Walton’s iAlumbra nonprofit. Co-chaired by former FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg and ex-Institute of Medicine president Harvey Fineberg, the project claims to “safeguard” vaccine policy—but critics see it as a thinly veiled effort to protect Pharma profits.
Participating groups like the AAP and ACOG have taken millions from Merck and Pfizer while endorsing their products without independent testing. Worse, ACOG pocketed $11 million from the CDC to aggressively push COVID-19 shots on pregnant women—an unproven gamble that was later walked back under Kennedy’s leadership.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Hospital prevails in wrongful death trial of 19-year-old Grace Schara, exposing systemic failures with COVID protocols and doctor worship
In a verdict that has left a grieving family shattered and advocates for medical freedom reeling, a Wisconsin jury sided with Ascension St. Elizabeth Hospital in the wrongful death lawsuit of Grace Schara, a 19-year-old with Down syndrome who died in 2021 after being subjected to aggressive COVID-19 treatment protocols. The Schara family alleged medical battery, negligence, and a lack of informed consent—claims that, if proven, would have exposed a chilling reality: hospitals nationwide have been operating under dangerous, protocol-driven mandates that strip patients of their rights and, in some cases, their lives. Yet, despite compelling testimony and evidence, the jury deliberated for just two hours before absolving the hospital and its staff of wrongdoing. The case reveals a grim truth—trust in the medical system is often misplaced, and justice for victims of institutionalized malpractice remains elusive.
Key points:
• Grace Schara died in 2021 after receiving a controversial COVID-19 treatment regimen, including sedatives and an unauthorized DNR order.
• Her family sued Ascension St. Elizabeth Hospital, alleging medical battery and lack of informed consent, but the jury ruled in favor of the defendants.
• The judge excluded the medical battery claim from jury deliberations, preventing the possibility of uncapped damages and shielding the hospital from greater liability.
• Legal experts warn that the case highlights systemic failures in patient consent and the dangers of protocol-driven medicine.
The fight for justice in a rigged system
Grace Schara’s tragic death was not an isolated incident—it was the result of a medical system that prioritizes rigid protocols over individualized care. Her family’s lawsuit detailed how doctors administered a lethal cocktail of sedatives, including Precedex, lorazepam, and morphine—drugs typically reserved for end-of-life care—without proper consent. Worse still, a "Do Not Resuscitate" order was placed in Grace’s chart against her family’s wishes, effectively sealing her fate.
Scott Schara, Grace’s father, did not mince words when describing the legal system’s complicity. “The legal system is in bed with the medical-industrial complex,” he told The Defender. His frustration is justified. Wisconsin law caps medical malpractice damages at $750,000—a figure that barely covers legal expenses, let alone provides meaningful restitution for a lost life. Worse, the judge’s decision to exclude the battery claim ensured that jurors never had the chance to consider whether hospital staff intentionally harmed Grace. The justice system in this case was a farce, built to worship doctors as if they are infallible and their protocols cannot be questioned, even when they cause immediate and deadly harm.
The illusion of impartiality and the power of programming
Jurors are conditioned from birth to trust doctors and hospitals implicitly. This subconscious bias makes it nearly impossible for them to accept that medical professionals could act with negligence—or worse, malice. As Scott Schara noted, “How can [jurors] be impartial in a society that programs them to rely on the state for their rights from the moment they are born?”
The speed of the jury’s deliberation—just two hours—speaks volumes. Cindy Schara, Grace’s mother, called the verdict “heartbreaking,” noting that the jury “did not give Grace the respect she deserved.” The family’s legal team argued that Ascension’s protocols overrode patient rights, yet jurors, steeped in societal deference to medical authority, could not reconcile the evidence with their ingrained beliefs.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Pharmaceutical whistleblower Aussie17 shared footage of Murakami’s presentation, where he emphasized: “The toxicity overlaps. The more doses you receive, the faster people die.” The study’s release coincides with broader demands for independent research into vaccine effects, particularly on younger adults. Earlier reports from Japanese medical experts suggested the shots could be seven times deadlier than COVID-19 for some demographics.
The Japanese data adds to mounting evidence challenging the safety of repeated COVID-19 vaccinations. With governments worldwide facing pressure to reassess mandates, the study underscores the need for transparency and informed consent in public health.
As Murakami’s team warned, the stakes are clear: “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.” Whether policymakers will act on these findings remains an open question.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
SHOCKING HPV STUDY: University of Maryland research reveals HPV jab given to 9-year-old girls causes serious adverse events, proving risk outweighs benefits
Why on earth would a nine-year-old girl need to get a dirty, deadly vaccine to prevent a sexually transmitted disease? Isn’t that dirty in and of itself? What’s next, toxic condoms for kids? Has the world gone completely insane, or is it all about causing infertility in girls as part of the big depopulation scheme that Bill Gates always talks about? You know, how if we do a really “great job” with vaccines and abortions we can reduce the world’s population by a few billion? Remember?
Now let’s talk about the dirty, nasty, perverse injections for little girls that spread cancer, wreck the baby-making organs, ruin menstrual cycles, and cause all kinds of other horrific health outcomes, per the research. Follow the science, right Fauci?
Study Links HPV Vaccine to Increased Risk of Autonomic Dysfunction and Menstrual Irregularities in Young Women
A groundbreaking study from the University of Maryland has raised serious concerns about the safety of the HPV vaccine, revealing significant increases in autonomic dysfunction and menstrual irregularities among young women who received the shot. Published in Drugs – Real World Outcomes, the research analyzed insurance claims from nearly 80,000 girls and women aged 9–26, finding elevated risks that critics argue were previously downplayed. The findings add fuel to an already heated debate over the necessity and safety of Gardasil and Cervarix—vaccines marketed to prevent HPV-related cancers but linked to thousands of adverse reactions, including fatalities.
Study Reveals Previously Overlooked Risks
Using a self-controlled case series design—a method that reduces bias by comparing individuals to their own pre-vaccination health—researchers identified:
• 1,654 cases of autonomic dysfunction (a condition disrupting heart rate, blood pressure, and digestion)
• 3,140 cases of menstrual irregularities, including severe disruptions like prolonged absence of periods or excessive bleeding.
Adjusted risk increases were striking:
• Autonomic dysfunction: 23% overall, spiking to 40% in women aged 18–26.
• Menstrual irregularities: 30% overall, with the highest risk (51%) in girls aged 9–17.
Lead researcher Dr. Linda Wastila stated the risks are “not insubstantial,” emphasizing that these conditions can severely impair quality of life.
Autonomic dysfunction can leave young women battling symptoms like:
• Extreme fatigue and dizziness
• Heart palpitations and chest pain
• Cognitive impairment (“brain fog”)
Meanwhile, menstrual irregularities reported in the study included:
• Premature ovarian insufficiency (akin to early menopause)
• Emergency-level bleeding episodes
• Hormonal imbalances affecting mental health
Critics argue these findings align with longstanding concerns about HPV vaccines’ neurotoxic ingredients, including aluminum and synthetic emulsifiers, which some studies suggest may disrupt nervous and endocrine systems.
The HPV vaccine debate isn’t new. Since Gardasil’s 2006 approval, reports of adverse events—including 89 deaths and 20,915 reactions logged in U.S. databases by 2010—have fueled skepticism. Merck, Gardasil’s manufacturer, faces lawsuits alleging it concealed risks.
Notably, most HPV infections resolve naturally without causing cancer, and the vaccine’s protection wanes after several years. Critics, like Dr. Joseph Mercola, argue the shot’s benefits are overstated: “Evidence suggests it increases precancerous lesions by nearly 45% in some cases.”
The University of Maryland study underscores the need for rigorous, independent safety reviews of HPV vaccines—particularly for adolescents. While public health agencies maintain that benefits outweigh risks, the research calls for greater transparency and informed consent. For families weighing vaccination, the study serves as a stark reminder: medical interventions must be scrutinized, not just marketed.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Federal judge upholds FDA’s decision to remove GLP-1 drugs from shortage list
A federal judge ruled Wednesday, June 18, that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) acted lawfully in its decision to remove popular GLP-1 medications from the national drug shortage list, effectively ending the legal sale of compounded versions of the weight loss and diabetes treatments.
In February, the FDA decided to officially remove semaglutide – sold under brand names such as Ozempic and Wegovy – from its drug shortage list. These drugs were previously in short supply, but the FDA determined that the situation improved enough to lift the designation, which had allowed compounding pharmacies to legally produce and sell alternatives.
The Outsourcing Facilities Association (OFA), which represents 503A compounding pharmacies, challenged the action in court. It argued that the removal was abrupt and harmed patient access, citing industry estimates that compounded drugs met 20 percent of GLP-1 demand. The group added that the FDA's removal of GLP-1 drugs like semaglutide was "arbitrary and capricious" and would limit patient access while driving up drug prices.
U.S. District Court Judge Mark Pittman dismissed the lawsuit. Pittman rejected the claims of the OFA, finding that the FDA's decision was based on appropriate administrative procedures and that the plaintiffs presented flawed or misleading arguments.
Pittman also claimed the OFA misread the data it cited and introduced evidence, such as a 10-page chart and a survey from telehealth provider Hims and Hers, that had not been part of the FDA's original review process. He noted that the Hims & Hers survey lacked transparency and reliability, offering no details on sample size or methodology to support claims of limited patient access.
"In cases where such mistakes can be attributed to either an accidental misread or an intentional mischaracterization, the Court prefers to attribute them to accident rather than malice," Pittman wrote. "However, plaintiffs' consistent and pervasive pattern of similar mistakes, in this case and OFA I, has made it increasingly difficult for the Court to assume they are the product of accident."
The ruling dismisses the case with prejudice, meaning OFA cannot bring the same claim again in district court. However, the organization filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, signaling the legal fight may continue.
FDA urges pharmacies and providers to transition patients quickly
GLP-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide and tirzepatide have soared in popularity due to their effectiveness in managing Type 2 diabetes and promoting weight loss. Demand for these drugs has at times outpaced supply, prompting temporary shortages and a boom in the compounding industry.
FDA-approved versions of the drugs are manufactured by pharmaceutical giants such as Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, but compounded alternatives often made by smaller pharmacies became more common during the shortage window. The FDA has since reiterated that compounded medications are only permitted when a drug is officially deemed in short supply and must meet strict safety standards.
"As a result of the FDA's action, community pharmacies, telehealth companies and other providers with a patient population relying on compounded semaglutide injection products will need to develop a transition plan. In its declaratory order, the FDA acknowledged that patients using these compounded products may face gaps in treatment and local shortages could persist.
The FDA's reasoning for extending the enforcement discretion period was, in part, to enable local pharmacies the opportunity to assess inventory and adjust ordering patterns based on new patterns of patient demand. However, the window of opportunity the FDA describes will not remain open long. As a result, stakeholders prescribing, receiving or dispensing compounded semaglutide injection products need to take immediate action to plan and adapt accordingly.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Peer-reviewed research reveals HORRIFIC HEALTH OUTCOMES from the HPV vaccine, including autonomic dysfunction, menstrual irregularities (POTS) and death
Worried about the HPV vaccine causing horrific side effects, not being effective, not necessary, and scary? You should be. Post market surveillance and a new University of Maryland study highlight significant safety concerns surrounding HPV vaccines, particularly Gardasil, including increased risks of autonomic dysfunction (e.g., POTS) and menstrual irregularities, with younger recipients showing statistically significant adverse effects.
Despite Merck’s acknowledgment of deaths in clinical trials—some potentially vaccine-related—and warnings against use in pregnant women, Gardasil remains widely recommended, even as lawsuits allege withheld safety data and regulators face criticism for inadequate oversight.
As states consider mandating the vaccine, researchers and advocates urge transparent risk-benefit discussions, challenging the prevailing "announcement approach" that often omits such conversations. The findings underscore the need for further independent scrutiny and informed decision-making amid ongoing legal and scientific debates.
Study Links HPV Vaccine to Increased Risk of Autonomic Dysfunction and Menstrual Irregularities in Young Women
A new study from the University of Maryland has found that adolescent girls and young women who receive the dangerous HPV vaccine face heightened risks of autonomic dysfunction—such as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS)—and menstrual irregularities.
Published Tuesday in Drugs – Real World Outcomes, the peer-reviewed research analyzed insurance claims from over 78,000 young women, revealing a 23% increased risk of autonomic dysfunction and a 30% higher likelihood of menstrual irregularities post-vaccination. The findings come amid growing scrutiny of Gardasil, Merck’s HPV vaccine, and ongoing lawsuits alleging the company downplayed safety risks.
Using a self-controlled case series method, researchers compared health outcomes in young women before and after HPV vaccination. Lead authors Dr. Linda Wastila and Dr. Yu-Hua Fu found statistically significant safety signals, particularly among younger recipients. “These risks are not insubstantial,” the authors wrote, urging healthcare providers to discuss potential risks with patients—a stance that conflicts with the “announcement approach” widely promoted by public health agencies, where providers skip risk-benefit discussions.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist and HPV vaccine researcher, called the study “significant” as the first U.S. research to link the vaccine to these conditions. Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., of Children’s Health Defense, added that the findings validate reports from vaccine-injured individuals long dismissed by medical authorities.
The study adds to mounting research questioning Gardasil’s long-term effects. While public health agencies emphasize its efficacy in preventing HPV-related cancers, emerging data—including Merck’s own clinical trials—have flagged safety signals like POTS and ovarian dysfunction. A 2015 BMJ investigation accused regulators of mishandling safety reviews, and lawsuits allege Merck concealed risks, including undisclosed adjuvants.
Dr. Peter C. Gotzsche, a Danish researcher, concluded in an expert report that Merck’s data manipulation made independent safety assessments “difficult if not impossible.” Despite this, Gardasil remains recommended for children as young as 9.
As states push for broader HPV vaccine mandates, the University of Maryland study underscores the need for transparent risk communication. With lawsuits pending and researchers calling for further investigation, families are urged to weigh evidence from both mainstream and independent sources before deciding. “Patients should consult their providers to discuss risks and benefits,” the authors advised—a message that challenges the status quo of vaccine policy.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA halts clinical trials shipping American cells overseas due to national security risks
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced June 18 the immediate suspension of all new clinical trials involving the transfer of American patient cells to foreign laboratories in “hostile” countries, citing concerns over national security and informed consent. The move comes after FDA leaders discovered a loophole in a Biden-era data security rule that permitted U.S. companies to send biological materials — such as DNA samples — to nations like China for genetic engineering as part of FDA-regulated trials. FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and Deputy Director Dr. Vinay Prasad warned that the practice exposed patients to unknown risks while enabling foreign governments to access sensitive genetic data. The agency now requires clinical trial sponsors to demonstrate transparency, secure handling of materials and robust consent processes for trials to resume, signaling a sharp pivot toward stricter oversight of biomedical research.
FDA takes strident action: Closing the “national security blind spot”
The FDA’s directive stems from investigative findings that some trials did not inform patients their cells, collected during treatment or research, were being sent abroad for modification. Dr. Makary stated the agency “only learned about the loophole this week,” calling it an egregious failure of prior administrations to protect American interests. “Foreign entities could engineer cells to target specific tissues, and we might not even know what’s coming back,” Dr. Prasad warned, emphasizing risks of bioweapon applications.
The halt targets trials relying on a Biden-authored data security rule, finalized in 2024, which allowed conditional transfers of biological samples to foreign labs for research. While the rule banned sensitive data exports to adversaries like China, it permitted exceptions for clinical trials regulated by the FDA — a gap the agency now deems unacceptable.
Concerns over bioengineering and data misuse
Beyond physical material risk, the FDA and National Institutes of Health (NIH) highlighted ethical failures in participant consent processes. “Patients may have their cells modified in ways they didn’t agree to and don’t understand,” Dr. Makary said. The agency’s statement accused foreign labs of exploiting the exemption to collect genetic information, raising the specter of identity theft or biometric targeting. NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya called the loophole an “unacceptable risk,” vowing to sever funding to trials found out of compliance.
National security analysts echoed these anxieties. “Chinese actors have long sought to exploit U.S. biomedical research gaps,” noted Dr. Elizabeth Dibble, a defense policy scholar. “This is a critical intervention to prevent foreign intelligence collection.”
A decade of tensions in biomedical research security
This crackdown revisits debates dating to the Obama and Trump eras over balancing scientific collaboration with China and national security. In 2018, U.S. intelligence agencies flagged Chinese labs stealing U.S. genetic research, and in 2021, NIH officials temporarily paused select joint studies. More recently, Biden’s 2024 Executive Order 14117 aimed to restrict sensitive health data exports but carved out exceptions for clinical trials — an exclusion now under scrutiny.
The FDA’s actions mirror President Trump’s 2025 Executive Order 14292, which directed agencies to end federal funding for unlabeled overseas research. Together, these orders reflect a bipartisan rise in urgency over foreign threats to U.S. scientific data.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The alternative: Rejecting Big Pharma’s deadly lies
Natural alternatives, from lifestyle changes to proven therapies like nattokinase (a potent blood-thinning enzyme), offer safer solutions without Big Pharma’s deadly side effects. Nattokinase is a powerful fibrinolytic enzyme derived from fermented soybeans, known for its ability to break down blood clots and improve circulation. Studies suggest it may help regulate blood pressure, reduce arterial stiffness, and support cardiovascular health by mimicking the body’s natural clot-dissolving processes. Unlike synthetic blood thinners, nattokinase works synergistically with the body’s systems, offering a gentler yet effective approach to maintaining optimal blood flow.
In addition to nattokinase, several heart-healthy herbs and natural compounds can further support cardiovascular wellness:
• Hawthorne – Rich in antioxidants, it strengthens heart muscle function, improves blood flow, and helps regulate blood pressure.
• Pomegranate – Its potent polyphenols enhance nitric oxide production, reducing arterial plaque and improving endothelial health.
• Garlic – Contains allicin, which lowers cholesterol, reduces blood pressure, and acts as a natural anticoagulant.
• Cayenne pepper - Capsules of cayenne pepper deliver capsaicin, which helps thin the blood, reducing blood pressure.
• Turmeric (Curcumin) – Fights inflammation, prevents arterial damage, and supports healthy circulation.
• Ginger – Promotes vasodilation, reduces platelet aggregation, and aids in maintaining healthy blood pressure levels.
The Brilinta scandal is just the latest proof that pharmaceutical companies cannot be trusted. Until regulators hold them accountable, patients must arm themselves with the truth—because their lives depend on it.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A decade of debates
The fray over thimerosal dates to 1999, when the FDA and CDC acted preemptively to eliminate it from pediatric vaccines amid unfounded anxiety about autism. Peer-reviewed research since then has consistently dismissed this hypothesis, as federal courts ruled in 2007 that no evidence existed for a thimerosal-autism connection. Yet Kennedy’s advocacy has kept the issue alive, framing it as a victory for those “dared to challenge complacent institutions.”
Pro-vaccine advocates argue that refocus on debunked risks distracts from real threats, like vaccine hesitancy and emerging pathogens. Meanwhile, critics of Kennedy’s approach—such as the American Medical Association — worry his team’s focus on “alternative truths” could cripple outreach efforts.
A crossroads for science and policy
As the ACIP deliberates, the nation watches a rare clash between populist health advocacy and institutional medicine. For Kennedy, the vote represents a chance to deliver on his promise to “put science back into the CDC.” For doubters, it’s a cautionary tale about the risks of sidelining consensus.
Regardless of the outcome, the meeting underscores a fundamental question: Can policymakers reconcile the democratic right to question established norms with the public good of evidence-based healthcare? The answers — whether in the form of a thimerosal ban or reaffirmed safety — will ripple far beyond the walls of the CDC.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Another vaccine shill out: CDC scientist who pushed COVID-19 and RSV injections RESIGNS over HHS policy shift
A senior Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientist overseeing respiratory virus data has left the agency, citing fears that its vaccine policies under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are abandoning scientific rigor.
Dr. Fiona Havers – a 13-year CDC veteran who shaped national recommendations for Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines – stepped down on Monday, June 16. She warned colleagues in a resignation email that her work was no longer being used to make "evidence-based" decisions.
Havers' research, cited in over 20 peer-reviewed studies, underpinned policies promoting vaccines for vulnerable groups including infants and the elderly. Her August 2021 CDC report claimed COVID-19 vaccines "reduce the risk for hospitalization." She also insisted in a 2024 study that RSV vaccines were tied to lower infant hospitalization rates – despite the injection causing neurological risks like Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Havers' exit followed the abrupt resignation of Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, a pediatric infectious disease expert who co-led the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Both departures came amid Kennedy's sweeping overhaul of federal vaccine advisory panels, including the removal of all 17 ACIP members.
On the one hand, critics accuse Kennedy of replacing independent experts with ideological allies. On the other hand, supporters argue the shakeup is necessary to purge corporate influence from public health.
Big Pharma influenced destroyed CDC credibility
The resignations highlight a deepening rift between career scientists and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The agency under Kennedy has already rolled back COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women without ACIP’s usual input.
Meanwhile, the 17 ousted ACIP members warned in a commentary published in the Journal of the American Medical Association that Kennedy's actions "may roll back the achievements of U.S. immunization policy." They also warned that his "destabilizing decisions" risk outbreaks of preventable diseases.
But drug safety advocate Kim Witczak countered that the CDC's credibility crisis predates Kennedy. She commented: "Where was [Havers'] concern during the COVID vaccine era?" Witczak, a member of the Food and Drug Administration's Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, pointed out that "the system only values critique when it suits internal narratives."
HHS spokeswoman Emily G. Hilliard defended Kennedy's reforms, stating vaccine policies will now follow "the gold standard of scientific integrity" free from "industry influence." The timing of Havers' departure came before ACIP's June 25 to 27 meeting, where new appointees will vote on fall booster recommendations.
Internal medicine physician Dr. Clayton J. Baker dismissed the uproar as media theatrics: "A low-level CDC employee leaving under a new administration isn't news," he commented. "The real story is why Americans lost trust in these institutions."
For Witczak, the resignations signal a overdue reckoning. "Public health is finally being forced to serve people, not [Big] Pharma," she warned. But the battle over vaccine policy's future is just beginning.
Watch Del Bigtree putting the CDC on notice over its admission of vaccine safety failures in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/b6818388-d435-4db3-b064-94c8c7315496
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A crossroads for healthcare transparency
ProPublica’s lawsuit and historical evidence underscore a broken system where the FDA prioritizes industry confidentiality over public safety. As Americans rely on generics for life-saving treatments, the lack of transparency risks repeating past tragedies.
Experts call for urgent reforms: mandating public data sharing, independent audits and stricter penalties for fraud. “Without transparency, patients cannot make informed choices—or trust their medicine is safe,” Browning warned.
The FDA’s response to this crisis will determine whether it evolves into a protector of public health or remains mired in secrecy, valuing corporate interests over lives.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Vaccine data in Japan reveals deadly trend: Deaths PEAK with each COVID jab – unvaccinated protected and vindicated
The truth is finally breaking through the walls of censorship and deception. A newly released Japanese database tracking 18 million vaccinated citizens has exposed a horrifying pattern: the more COVID-19 shots a person receives, the sooner they are likely to die. The data, suppressed by governments and dismissed by corporate media, reveals a sharp spike in deaths just 90 to 120 days after vaccination—a trend that cannot be ignored. As the world grapples with skyrocketing excess mortality, heart failure in young athletes, and sudden deaths among the vaccinated, this bombshell report confirms what dissenting scientists warned from the beginning: these experimental injections were never safe. They were never about health. And now, the evidence suggests they may have been part of something far more sinister.
Key points:
• A Japanese database tracking 18 million vaccinated individuals reveals a deadly spike in mortality 3 to 4 months after vaccination.
• Respected Tokyo University professor Dr. Yasufumi Murakami warns: “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.”
• Deaths peak earlier with each additional dose, suggesting cumulative toxicity from repeated mRNA injections. Unlike the vaccinated, unvaccinated populations show no such spike in mortality—debunking claims that COVID-19 itself is the primary killer.
Historical precedent, like the 1976 swine flu vaccine withdrawal after just 53 deaths, highlights the unprecedented negligence in allowing these shots to remain on the market.
The data they didn’t want you to see
When journalist Masako Ganaha and a team of Japanese researchers bypassed government stonewalling to release this explosive dataset, the implications were undeniable. The numbers don’t lie. Graph after graph showed the same terrifying trend: vaccinated individuals were dying at alarming rates within months of their last shot, while the unvaccinated saw no such spike. Dr. Murakami, a pharmaceutical scientist with over 100 published studies, minced no words: “If the vaccine had no toxicity or didn’t induce death, there wouldn’t be a peak. That’s the point.”
The most damning evidence came from a chart tracking deaths by dose count. Those who received three shots died sooner than those who took two, and those who took two died sooner than those who took one. The peak mortality window—90 to 120 days post-injection—aligned eerily with reports of sudden deaths worldwide, from healthy athletes collapsing on the field to young professionals dying in their sleep.
A betrayal of public trust
Governments and pharmaceutical giants assured the world these shots were “safe and effective.” They silenced dissent, censored doctors, and smeared skeptics as conspiracy theorists. Yet here, in cold, hard data, is proof that they knew—or should have known—the truth. The 1976 swine flu vaccine was pulled after just 25 deaths. Today, with millions dead or injured, not a single country has halted COVID-19 vaccinations.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a leading cardiologist and early critic of the vaccine rollout, put it bluntly: “It’s unacceptable to have anyone take an injection electively and die. It’s absolutely unacceptable.” Yet this is exactly what has happened—on a scale that dwarfs every medical scandal in modern history.
The unvaccinated were right all along
While the vaccinated now face uncertain futures—plagued by toxic spike proteins, autoimmune disorders, and heart damage—the unvaccinated stand vindicated. They resisted one of the most aggressive propaganda campaigns in history, enduring job losses, social ostracization, and even forced segregation. Now, as excess deaths soar among the jabbed, the unvaccinated remain healthier, freer, and alive - their souls intact.
This isn’t just about science. It’s about criminal negligence, corporate greed, and a depopulation agenda hiding in plain sight. The Japanese data is a wake-up call.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia