53660
Official telegram channel for Nick Fuentes.
I know it may come across like I’m pretty “hung up” on the 2024 election or that I’m gloating all the time about being right— you have to understand (or remember) how over-the-top the propaganda was for Trump in 2024.
And not only that, but how in public and in private, once again the snakes were getting ready to chop my head off, this time for being anti-Trump. They were actually licking their lips and bricked up at the thought that I had permanently ruined myself by going so hard against Trump.
And of course what Trump 2.0 represented was a big fat giant Israeli op, and they all knew that and were a part of it too.
Now they are all quiet. So, so quiet.
America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing Iran, the Matt Walsh marriage debate, and Trump’s “Obama” pivot
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing the MLK files (lol) and the Nelk interview of Netanyahu
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
One more thing— it is very important to keep in mind that ever since October 7th 2023 (almost 2 years ago), the entire world has gotten redpilled. Okay? We are in a different world in 2023 than we were in 2019.
AfD is the biggest party in Germany, Trump got re-elected promising mass deportations, Twitter has effectively become 4chan, Dan Bilzerian is going viral every day saying "Fuck Israel."
Tucker has been in journalism since 1994. He has flipped and flopped many times. But only in roughly the last year has he had anything, literally anything at all, to say about Israel. Now some welcome the development and say "finally!"
I say, what took you so long? Remember— Tucker's dad was a Reagan appointee working for the CIA and the Hungarian embassy (closely tied to Israel). Tucker was in Nicaragua with the Contras in the 80s, he lived down the street from the CIA officer who overthrew Mossadegh.
And for 30 years Tucker had nothing to say about Israel... until literally everybody got redpilled. He is not leading the pack, incrementally redpilling the masses, as some people believe. Rather, he is trailing slightly behind the consensus.
Just like how he was known as a bow-tie wearing neocon Republican and then AFTER Trump won the election he became a vociferous populist when O'Reilly was knocked out and Tucker took his slot. He was a basic bitch "Paleocon" type... until after everyone got redpilled, now he's the notorious antisemite.
So he will appear after the consensus has already moved forward to echo its complaints, but always with a note of caution. At the RNC Tucker gave a ten minute speech focused on praising Trump for not inciting civil disorder after he got shot. That was bizarre.
At TPUSA he said we must acknowledge Epstein's affiliation with Mossad because to ignore it would concede the narrative to "subterranean antisemites." He frequently derides the elites for not doing a better job managing the disaffected masses.
So this idea that Tucker is the tip of the spear in the mainstream, pushing the normies along, thats totally not true.
I think these Europeans tend to have a blindspot about Trump, Tucker, and Vance because these figures consistently deliver direct benefits for the Far Right in Europe, even if they are hurting America.
This is why it is important to always consider foreign influence, whether it is coming from Israel or even from "White advocates" outside of America.
Once again, Tucker Carlson has said something ostensibly "based" on his show. Rather than simply leave it at that, just as before, people are using this as evidence that Tucker could not possibly be an inorganic or inauthentic actor.
In an interview with a German reporter from Germany, Tucker said that there is a post-WWII assumption that homogeneous white countries are a threat to world peace and that assumption is false. This is absolutely correct and a powerful, based idea.
But rather than leave it at that, this British (European) commentator asks— given Tucker's statement... how could Tucker possibly be inorganic? The strength of the statement is such that it dispels any doubt about Tucker's authenticity.
But this is a complete non-sequitur. It does not follow. The skepticism about Tucker's authenticity has to do with his connections to the CIA through his father, Peter Thiel, JD Vance, Joe Kent, Javier Milei, Viktor Orban, et al. It has to do with his world tour conducting diplomacy with foreign heads of state, meddling in elections, and intervening in US conflicts.
If Tucker is a "limited hangout," or any type of inauthentic voice then we would actually expect that his rhetoric on his show would play to a particular audience, that's sort of the entire point. It wouldn't be effective disinfo if it didn't "sound" organic or as if it is channeling popular sentiment.
It's sort of like saying that a movie or television actor's performance is so compelling and realistic, it proves that they aren't an actor at all but they actually really are the fictional character they are playing.
At one time or another, many Right Wing figures have "sounded based," like Donald Trump, Ezra Levant, Costin Alamariu. This is why we say "fell for it again." Because gullible Right Wingers are constantly duped by insincere actors who pander to them.
https://x.com/academicagent_x/status/1947201239411748895?s=46
Not doing a show tonight I’ll be back tomorrow.
😌😌😌
Buona was nothing special when I was growing up, at least that’s how I remember it. But they have really leveled up in the last decade across the board— their menu, service, interior, ingredients.
I had a big beef sandwich today and it was a truly “wow” experience. This is like a Sputnik-level event.
My rebellion as a white man is radicalism and to threaten the system by being resourceful and competent. Like Trump, Andrew Tate, I would argue even many of the White Nationalists.
The “Shane Gillis” rebellion is ironic detachment and offending the system by embracing slovenliness and being based at the water cooler.
White men need to use their real voice, not the homer simpson voice. Don’t be a cad, try to be sophisticated. Don’t embrace being a big ugly slob, try to be aesthetic.
I’m so sick of seeing these “dude bros” and wiggers.
He plays the caricature of the white male that was created by liberals, where “I’m white” is synonymous with “I’m vulgar, odious, repulsive, and insensitive.”
Shane Gillis is a sympathetic portrayal of a white chud seen through the eyes of Ezra Klein. His character is as if he was looking at himself through the eyes of a contemptuous liberal bitch.
And white men who are deeply self-conscious and psychically affected by the suffocating matriarchal culture we live in seem to identify with this. They’re grasping for some image of a masculine white male.
And what they’ve settled on is a semi-problematic, harmless, self-hating doofus whose identity seems to be wrapped up in being edgy and based at his job.
Everything he does is so one-note and cheap. “Nobody knows any WNBA players!” Yeah I remember that joke from 7th grade. Haven’t we “been there?”
His entire persona is sort of like a tribute act for chuds who say things like “they could never make a show like South Park today!” He’s a character actor playing mentally raped but disgruntled male normie.
And there’s this phenomenon of so many young white men self-inserting and seeing him as their avatar— the fat, vulgar, horny doofus.
A generation of low self-esteem men who see themselves as physically revolting, mentally retarded, disgruntled against a “wokeified” culture but opting to chirp about it in a passive aggressive way instead of choosing radicalism.
America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing Trump’s disavowal of his base and the coming Iran War
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing my interview with Candace and Trump’s pivot on Ukraine
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
5 months into Trump II and it’s a bigger disaster than I even thought was possible.
Got what you voted for dummies?
Fuck everyone who attacked me last year.
To be clear, is it directionally positive to have the TPUSA audience cheering when Tucker calls out Israel? Of course.
They are feeding something that they don’t yet understand. And it’s short sighted, which is why many are urging people like Tucker to pump the breaks. It’s like when those crime bosses hired the Joker to kill batman.
So we can strategically accept that Tucker’s advocacy is good for us but he isn’t us. We have to take and take and keep coming back for more. Always audacity.
Live with Aarvoll:
https://x.com/aarvoll_/status/1947342457055699340?s=46
AND ANOTHER THING— you know he is full of shit when he says things like "I don't even own a tv!" Everyone knows that all real Americans love tv and their phones. They are literally essential for civil order to distract the masses from the monotony and misery of every day life.
The only people who "dont have a tv" are college kids living in dorms and people who are so rich they fly between their homes in Maine and Florida on a private jet and don't need the distraction.
Do you know what normal people would do without daytime television and Netflix? They would commit suicide en masse. Another little "quirk" that betrays a deep contemptuousness and disconnect with real Americans.
Let me also be clear— I think that directionally it is without a doubt a positive development that Tucker is pushing so hard against Israel or would say something about White Identity. Of course these statements are further along to the Right than anything in the mainstream in 30 years.
That is not up for debate. But I push back on this impulse to look for Trump and Tucker to say something based and every time we hear something we like we are "convinced" to trust them implicitly. "Said something based? I've seen enough, they are now beyond reproach."
And I see this constantly. We must always be evaluating everyone and everything considering all of the facts. This is a big reason why I was able to predict the failure of Trump's second term, because I was looking beyond the headlines and "based" one-liners at rallies.
Understanding politics requires a more advanced reasoning that identifying agreement and disagreement. "Tucker has been good lately." He has been a journalist for 35 years and just discovered that diversity is a problem? His dad ran CIA propaganda and all his friends are CIA but he said something I agree with so now he's square?
We have to be smarter than that.
It is important to consider what Tucker actually said and to whom and when. Tucker said to a German reporter from Germany for the German press that Germany should not recapitulate its national identity in the shadow of the Holocaust to include millions of rapefugees from the Middle East.
It is a very profound statement and absolutely true, it is essential. But consider that Tucker is saying this about the most powerful EU and NATO country in Europe. He has never once said anything similar to this in the United States, in fact he has said the opposite.
In the past, Tucker has gone so far as to say that White Identity is evil, it is Nazi ideology, it repudiates individualism and embodies the spirit of the Devil and he will personally reject White Identity politics when it inevitably arises in America and claims to speak for him.
He has instead pushed for a "colorblind meritocracy." So what gives? Ethnonationalism for Germany, colorblind meritocracy for the US? Do Tucker's new statements abrogate his previous statements? Is that evidence that he has "woken up?" I don't think so.
Elon Musk also has this double standard for Europe and the United States. Elon, like Tucker, is a friend of the US Intelligence Community. His rockets launch DoD satellites that power Starshield, the basis of US 5th generation warfare.
I don't believe that either Elon nor Tucker are ideological White Nationalists, race essentialists, or White Identitarians. What I see is consistent alignment with the interests of the US Security State.
How can Tucker love Israel and want to support Israel but not want a war in Iran and attack Israel's influence on our government? Because the Abraham Alliance is the key to Washington's pivot to Asia but it won't work if we get bogged down in Iran.
Why is Tucker an ethnonationalist for Germany but not for the US? It may be because diversity is undermining the political stability of Germany, the anchor of NATO and the EU, or because the diversity issue is empowering parties like the AfD which are less Russophobic.
Why does Tucker sound like Charle Coughlin at TPUSA but got the "Austrian" Javier Millei elected? Because in the US he is trying to flank Zohran Mamdani, in Argentina he is trying to outflank China on behalf of the US government.
America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing the Wall Street Journal article on Trump’s letter to Epstein
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
I have become enraged with Portillo’s and every time I visit it makes me boiling over with anger in a way that makes me physically sick.
It has become a complete dump. Service is terrible, the food is a joke. Endless gimmicks that insult our intelligence. They’re serving breakfast now, how about try making a good beef sandwich again?
The chain has become a regional embarrassment and a source of shame.
The difference between Portillo’s and Buona Beef has become so profound.
The quality of the bread, meat, freshness, flavor— even the service and overall restaurant experience.
I’ve been eating both my entire life and Portillo’s has gone so low and Buona is soaring.
Shane seems to mirror Louis CK. Louis played a similar character, in the sense that he also played an odious fat self-hating white male who was proud of masturbating.
Except Louis’ portrayal was an apologetic white liberal aware of his own awkwardness, Shane’s is like an emboldened slob who is pleased with how he offends.
The different between Shane and Norm is that Norm actually was a genius, was brilliant, and wasn’t afraid to be articulate and profound. He was an actual joke-writer.
I don’t think I’ve ever heard Shane tell a joke without leaning on “politically incorrect” tropes, edgelording, or his physicality. He’s really more like a clown than a comedian— the joke is that his physical appearance looks stupid and silly.
People seem to like the “humor” for the same reason that liberals liked Hannah Gadsby— because it’s “important,” it’s more of a political statement. In the absence of liberals to react or be triggered, it isn’t very funny.
Shane Gillis is like the ironic mullet of comedy
Читать полностью…
America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing Trump's new war on Russia and Andrew Schulz's call out against me
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
If you attacked me over this last year: Fuck You.
Читать полностью…
Something that you pick up on if you are a careful and perceptive observer of politics or even human behavior for that matter, is that words are not random.
When Tucker says that the system needs to admit that Epstein was Mossad in order to not cede narrative control to “creepy subterranean antisemites” … that’s actually a pretty unusual idea that deserves scrutiny.