1924
Website - https://peercoin.net/ Forum - https://talk.peercoin.net/ Discord - https://discord.gg/m294ReV Twitter - https://twitter.com/peercoinppc/ Reddit - https://reddit.com/r/Peercoin/ Blog - https://medium.com/peercoin
mati181
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/390501055588335617/1231858027578130463/Screen_Recording_20240422_084331_MiracleBox.mp4?ex=66387c30&is=66260730&hm=6674cb1b40e4760462143e1419da1801c919083fc1a8627c2f3ca3441e083a82&
peerpepe
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/390501055588335617/1231720096288997456/iDYBosPEQDKplvOKRRzJkg.png?ex=6637fbbb&is=662586bb&hm=16ca81753ed3fa5434710daf61f2cdb40f73be55ef9846d3eed90e186007e177&
peerpepe
you have to enter from ANUS to Bank on it.
jordgubbar
i'll gladly enter the peercoin building through the anus door
matt_l_m
I'd compromise with a standard tx policy that prioritises non-spam. Rewarding Peercoin holders with burnt fees in exchange for allowing some level of spam seems fair to me though.
nagalim
A simple priority that minters give to certain types of txns seems pretty straightforward. It does not require quantification.
nagalim
That feels subjective, and prone to breaking consensus
nagalim
So they both pay 0.01, but if the block fills then data txns get pushed out first. Data txn cost goes to infinity when the block fills with normal txns
matt_l_m
Well a premium fee model is a type of priority system.
nagalim
A priority system could be easier, and more acceptable?
matt_l_m
I did propose a comprehensive anti-spam measure that covers inputs and outputs. If I get time I might make an RFC for it.
peerpepe
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/390501055588335617/1231720052999585876/bB1cJkIyTleHRtKv9yyr7w.png?ex=6637fbb0&is=662586b0&hm=b4dc051a8e7c09237cca284cc29f2773375e60995659bc7aceda8ce413219b75&
sentinelrv
Peercoin Bank was foretold by The Flash TV show.
peerpepe
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/390501055588335617/1231648830580195488/Fgz-KLD5T3GNeus3JJWJWQ.png?ex=6637b95c&is=6625445c&hm=11674c9678c57a86c8b6f7024754f2bd275d8f1e899c807929efe07ffc32998a&
belovachap
https://tenor.com/view/youre-so-weak-weak-powerless-judging-despise-gif-15666774
Hi Admins
Do you need a new blockchain deveI₀per?
nagalim
I also dont think it needs to be at consensus level
matt_l_m
That's the case with your idea too assuming you want it at consensus level and not as standard tx policy.
matt_l_m
A separate block limit for superfluous data could work, though I'd like them to pay more even if blocks are not busy as I see it as wasteful data.
nagalim
Rather than charge blanket costs, have a separate fee market for regular and data txns
matt_l_m
And the extra blockspace just adds more data that nodes have to process.
matt_l_m
Also a fee market might prevent congested blocks and many stuck transactions but it pushes the fees up for regular transactions which should be given priority.
nagalim
It feels like wack-a-mole, if you introduce friction one way then people will seek ways to do data another way, like p2th