25182
Nationalist, Classical Liberal, moderate centrist (circa 1900). You can plagiarize any of my writing & content. Follow: t.me/racerealismchannel
That it's practically impossible to execute insane criminals is a farce and a stain on the American justice system; "Ummmm, they have to UNDERSTAND why they're being executed! You're being really Cruel and Unusual right now..."
It's absurd that schizos and other lunatics — who already have higher rates of violence than the general population — are wandering the streets to begin with, let alone so frequently released after committing violent crimes.
The irreparably insane should be quarantined for life or euthanized to save pointless expenditure. Insane violent criminals should be experimented upon, then at least they can serve some use to society.
Western legal systems designed for 115 average IQ people who lived two centuries ago are not equipped to deal with third worldification and modern dysgenic retards. We need laws as strict as Singapore's and Saudi Arabia's.
Iryna Zarutska's killer was found "incompetent to stand trial."
Trump should've had this animal executed by firing squad as soon as he was in police custody.
A sensible society would regard insanity and stupidity as aggravating factors that result in immediate death penalty.
Surprising discovery from this paper: Dating apps have decreased the share of dual-earner couples by increasing the percentage of stay-at-home wives.
Читать полностью…
They even called it the "Dignidad" Act. Everyone involved with this should be given the death penalty for treason.
Читать полностью…
Charlie Kirk on the Dignity Act: "This is worse than 'soft amnesty.' This de facto ends the mass deportations Americans just voted for."
This act gives work permits, deportation protection, and infinitely renewable legal status to most immigrants who arrived pre-2021.
It was sponsored by Latinx immigrant María Elvira Salazar, and co-sponsored by 20 Republican and 20 Democrat traitors.
It is being pushed as "the only serious bipartisan immigration package in years."
I forgot to mention genetic confounders from this paper, which inflate the shared environment influences relative to heritability.
Firstly, assortative mating results in both parents carrying traits that correlate with tattooing, which shrinks the differences between identical and non-identical twins, meaning genetic effects are "masked" and attributed to shared environmental effects. This mechanism is mentioned briefly in the paper.
Secondly, homophily (or assortative friendship): People choose friends who are more genetically similar to themselves than random members of their ethnic group. Typically the relationship is genetically equivalent to third cousins. This means that the shared cultural environmental effect on tattooing is also genetically influenced.
Homophily wasn't accounted for in the twin study and I have no idea how one would even begin to calculate the effects of this. The paper included neither multivariate genetic analyses nor polygenic scores, so direct genetic correlations and indirect genetic effects could not be quantified.
Anyway, the rapid rise of tattoos could be due to the fact that significant proportions of the population are "genetically primed" to embrace this social contagion. These members of the population cluster together, become influential on social media or in other entertainment, and then negatively influence otherwise normal members of the population. Edit: leftism spreads the same way.
New Danish twin study on tattoos:
Heritability estimates for getting tattooed were low, i.e. the rate of tattooing for identical and non-identical twins (~100% and ~50% shared genes, respectively) was pretty similar. The authors noted that this is an abnormal finding for a behavior study; typically, behaviors are ~50% heritable. Replications may find a slightly higher heritability estimate for tattooing.
If this paper's findings are accurate, it indicates a strong shared environmental influence: exposure to the same culture, fashion, media, overlapping friendship groups, etc. This shared environment influence on tattooing persisted throughout adulthood, which led the authors to conclude that "tattooing is a cultural group clustering phenomenon." In other words, tattooing is a self-reinforcing and somewhat self-perpetuating cult (the term "tattoo bubble" is sometimes used in research). ~50% of people get their first tattoo to bond with friends/family and the number of close friends with tattoos significantly predicts the probability that an individual will get tattooed (β = .244, p < .001).
The male-female tattoo disparity (~30% vs. ~41.5%) is also evidence of this notable environmental influence, given that women are significantly more conformist and status-obsessed than men. The average woman is completely beholden to the values and expectations of their peers and society at large. They easily succumb to peer pressure ("All the girlies are getting tattoos, you don't want to be the LOSER of the group, do you?") or see some tatted Onlyfans whore on TikTok with millions of followers and think: "If I get tattoos, I'll get male attention too!" (the opposite is true, men on average hate tattoos on women).
The Danish study does not invalidate recent data showing that tattoos correlate with mental illness, sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, low IQ, low socioeconomic status, impulsivity, drug abuse, criminality, obesity, etc. In fact, the authors found that smokers were over twice as likely to have tattoos as non-smokers (65.2% vs. 29.3%). Moreover, young women are approximately twice as mentally ill as young men (see here), which is reflected in their greater propensity for tattooing.
Tattoos are still a fairly reliable predictor of negative behavioral traits and they should be avoided when selecting a partner (note that more/bigger tattoos = more dysgenic). At best, they indicate that your would-be spouse is an impulsive conformist and not particularly intelligent.
The Danish paper notes that while tattooing was less prevalent in parental generations, the behavioral traits associated with tattooing may have been present. It is extremely unlikely that dysgenic selection among Whites played no role in the rise of tattoos. Nevertheless, it is equally unlikely that dysgenics alone can explain the meteoric rise in tattooing, particularly among women:
Early 1990s ~1% or fewer had tattoos
Early 2000s: ~15%
Early 2010s: ~25%
Early 2020s: ~35%
In conclusion, this paper is a whitepill because it implies that tattoo prevalence can be reversed, to some degree, by propaganda alone.
Tinder increased promiscuity but not long-term relationship formation or relationship quality. Dating inequality rose, especially among men, alongside rates of sexual assault and sexually transmitted diseases. It may have improved mental health but only for women (boosted their egos?).
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/app.20240455
Restore Britain is pro-youth and pro-freedom:
"I am with the young British men and women who feel crushed under inflated house prices, stagnating wages, record tax burden and just generally a really piss-poor standard of living that is falling embarrassingly far behind countries we once competed with."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2039702964852392212
"It wasn’t that long ago millions of young people had some of the best months of their lives stolen from them all to unsuccessfully avoid what was a nasty cold for the overwhelming majority. To suggest youngsters have not sacrificed anything in recent years is offensive guff."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2039939670616760500
"The way to give our young people their future back is not more tax, more regulation, more government. It's to cut. Cut, cut, cut. Slash it back. All of it. A regulation bonfire visible from space."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/1995493230193045824
National average IQ vs. lifetime net fiscal contribution per migrant (Dutch data):
The only significant net-positive contributors were Northern Europeans, North Americans, and the Japanese.
Every non-White ethnic group made a net-negative contribution, excluding the Israelis and "Four Asian Tigers" (Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore), who made a minor net-positive contribution, and the aforementioned Japanese.
Average annual and lifetime net cost per migrant, by country of origin.
Danish and Dutch data, respectively.
Women lifting to become "muscle mommies" as a form of transgenderism (autoandrophilia) is one of my theories, but I'm sure somebody proposed it before I did.
Aside from narcissistic autoeroticism, women are retards who think traits they find attractive in men are traits that men find attractive in women; they wear heels (height), get high-paying jobs (resources), tattoos (dangerousness/ruggedness), buccal fat removal (chiseled features), etc. These are all forms of soft transgenderism resulting from the breakdown of gender norms.
When women learn that heterosexual men are generally not attracted to stereotypically masculine traits, they respond with total bewilderment ("But I'm a 35-year-old DOCTOR! Why can't I find a husband?!") or belligerent obstinance ("A REAL man would find [masculine trait] sexy, but you're just a small penis porn-brained incel").
All of these horrifying trends are amplified by female conformism and their obsession with status. For example, it's plausible that the astronomical whorishness of women online today was at least partially caused by the popularity of Onlyfans girls, leading to runaway whoredom. Women see that nudity = "status" (in their minds, followers + male attention = status), and conclude that they must post nudes to compete and become "high status."
Many of the behavioral traits that correlate with being an internet whore also correlate with trooning out in the gym, getting tattoos, piercings, etc., which reminds me of the Spiteful Mutant Hypothesis (or "social epistasis amplification model"): Dysgenic people reach critical mass in a society, acquire some level of cultural dominance, and negatively influence the behavior of would-be normal people around them. Those who resist these trends are generally theorized to be more genetically healthy (mentally stable, etc.), although this may not necessarily be the case; natural nonconformists (autistics, psychopaths, etc.) may resist these trends out of pure disagreeableness.
Female intrasexual sabotage (encouraging unattractive behaviors among sexual competitors, distinct from being a spiteful mutant) undoubtedly contributes to these trends, but I'm unsure to what extent. "Wow, girl, you look GREAT with 12-year-old boy hair. You should go bald next. Fat? No way, you look beautiful. In fact, you should eat even more!"
Regarding women trooning out in the gym, specifically: Many are "former" anorexics for whom lifting became a "healthy" (obviously, they are not healthy, they are infertile) outlet for their body dysmorphia and obsessive-compulsive thinking around food and weight.
Anyway, to conclude: Every healthy society in human history has been structured in a way that mitigates the natural retardation of women. We must repeal their rights for their own good.
"We show that marriage rates decline when the predicted probability that a woman earns more than a man increases."
"Marriage rates declined substantially in the US, from about 81 percent in 1970 to 51 percent in 2010 for young adults aged 25 to 39."
"The secular increase in the aggregate likelihood that a woman earns more than a man explains 23 percent of the decline in the rates of marriage from 1970 to 2010."
Make Women Poor Again.
http://doi.org/10.3386/w19023
"Young men betrayed by society, women most affected"
Читать полностью…
China's private tutoring ban increased expected total fertility by ~8% in areas where the policy was strongly enforced (from 1.61 to 1.73 children per family).
The following factors explained 43% of the variance: Reduced perceived educational competition between parents; reduced financial and time expenditure; improved parental health and parent-child relationships.
The effect on fertility intention was significantly smaller for mothers (0.03) than fathers (0.13), and for those who spent less time/money on education/tutoring before the ban. It was also slightly smaller for those with a bachelor's degree or above.
A very Asiatic way to increase birth rates, but at least we can extrapolate:
Reduce parental stress + increase time/resource availability = more babies (driven primarily by male fertility intention).
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf096
If DeCarlos Brown was competent enough to target the only tiny defenseless White girl on a train full of Blacks, announce that he specifically murdered her due to her race ("I got that White girl"), and flee the scene of the crime, then he's competent enough to face the consequences of his actions — preferably the gallows, broadcast on every TV channel and streaming platform.
Читать полностью…
Keith Woods is emblematic of the hysterical third world tranny politics popular on twitter these days.
April 7th: He sincerely believes that "evil" Drumpft is going to vaporize the entirety of Iran "for the Jews."
April 8th: He claims (by retweet proxy) that Trump negotiating peace is "the biggest strategic loss for America since Vietnam" and that "Iran is emerging as the 4th center of world power."
It's shameless. Similar routine with October Whenever: Pro-Palestine people celebrated Israeli civilians getting butchered, only to cry "genocide!" a week later when Palestinian civilians were butchered in revenge.
Dating apps have reduced interracial dating:
For years, leftist activist-academics have pressured dating apps into promoting miscegenation by crafting algorithms that show "more enthusiasm for diversity" and developing "theories and practices of design that unsettle entrenched preferences" (Levy, 2018).
"Dating platforms have the opportunity to disrupt particular social structures... designing platforms to make it easier for people of different races to meet could overcome biases" (Cornell University, 2018).
The extent to which dating apps modified their algorithms is unknown but some measures have been taken. Numerous dating apps have removed race/ethnicity filters, largely in response to BLM hysteria circa 2020, and, in one case, an app was forced by the Dutch government to modify its "racist" algorithm.
Nevertheless, a new 2026 study found that the increased use of dating apps increases the percentage of same-race couples, while decreasing assortative mating based on education and employment status.
Australia's most decorated war hero was charged with murder for "war crimes" allegedly committed 15-20 years earlier in Afghanistan.
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australias-most-decorated-soldier-ben-roberts-smith-arrested-over-alleged-war-2026-04-07/
Gavin Newsom's wife (who had consensual sex with Harvey Weinstein) states:
- Her and Gavin are working on legislation that censors tech companies to prevent young men from becoming right-wing.
- Every problem in society could be fixed if women made all of the decisions.
- Had more women been in control of tech companies, they would have never allowed "so much bigotry, racism, misogyny and hate online."
- Female leaders would have abolished anonymity long ago.
Were Newsom to become president, America would fall under censorial gynocratic tyranny like nothing we've ever seen before. It would make 2016-era censorship look like a joke.
New study on adolescent troons (n=2,083) finds that they become significantly more insane after medical gender reassignment.
Another longitudinal study presented similar results in 2021. Both papers also found that adolescents with gender dysphoria had higher baseline (pre-treatment) levels of mental illness than the control groups.
The 2026 paper criticized existing research on troons as follows:
"Medical [gender reassignment] is often suggested to be beneficial, even vital, for the mental health of adolescents suffering from [gender dysphoria], but the evidence supporting subsequent improvements in mental health, quality of life or functioning is very limited... The few longitudinal studies have been of low quality and provided inconsistent results. The sample sizes have been small; there usually has been no control group, follow-up periods have been short, and the measures of assessing changes in mental health have varied. Loss to follow-up has often been substantial."
Male g-spot "discovered" - unsurprisingly, it is located on the penis and not the inside the anus.
Читать полностью…
"Restore Britain is the party for young British men and women who are treated like a piece of dirt on the shoe. We will cut your taxes, enable you to buy a home, help you to raise a family and deport the third world sex pests harassing you in your towns. We are on your side."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2039670701280391538
Very rare to see a right-wing political party courting the youth in opposition to the boomer gerontocracy.
Big Balls (former DOGE employee): “White men in particular have been completely villainized in society… and our older generations have kind of just let it happen.”
Читать полностью…
NYT: Banning birthright citizenship could deal a heavy blow to Asians.
Читать полностью…
Sex differences in general knowledge:
Test measured 19 domains of general knowledge, grouped into six first-order factors and one second-order general factor.
Men significantly outscored women on the second-order general factor and four out of six first-order factors: Current Affairs (0.82d), Physical Health and Recreation (0.75d), Science (0.58d), and Arts (0.31d).
Women significantly outscored men on the first-order factor of Family (-0.46d) but, surprisingly, there was no sex difference in the first-order factor of Fashion (-0.01d).
Women outscored men in the domains of Fashion, Popular Music, Medicine, and Cookery.
"Data obtained from 469 female and 167 male undergraduates"
Source: Lynn, Irwing, Cammock (2001)
British news presenter recounts the horrific case of a 15-year-old girl who was dragged into the woods and raped by Afghan migrants.
The girl repeatedly begged members of the public for help, but they all ignored her. She recorded one such interaction with a woman on her phone; the woman asked "are you alright?" but seemingly did nothing to help her.
The presenter then says the ONLY policy that would prevent this from happening again — banning all immigration from Afghanistan — is "going too far" because it would result in the collective judgment of an entire ethnic group. He says the thought did cross his mind, but he convinced himself that it was wrong because it would be heckin' racist or whatever.
His "solution" is to keep the migrants in hotels until their asylum claims have been processed, after which, they would be free to roam the streets and rape until their hearts' content.
Public support for eugenic policies in the United States:
~40-50% of people support policies that encourage lower fertility among the poor, unintelligent, and criminal.
~40% of people support policies that encourage higher fertility among the intelligent.
~30% of people support the sterilization of criminals.
Support for eugenic policies correlates with the extent to which individuals view traits as genetically heritable.
Before and after montage of El Salvador shared by Bukele on twitter.
He fixed everything and all he had to do was throw the worst 2% of the population in jail for life.
Capitally punishing them all would've been better but he probably couldn't get away with that.
Women are becoming (even more) brain damaged due to being choked during sex. Naturally, straight men are blamed for this: "Porn-brained rape culture proliferators!" Data paints a different story.
Women prefer far more "rapey" porn than men.
- Aroused by aggression: 70% of women, 40% of men
- Actively seek aggression 38%, 27%
- Aroused by hard aggression: 35%, 13%
- Aroused by women in pain: 32%, 20%
- Want to see more aggression: 16%, 3%
The gays (incl. troons) exhibit much higher rates of both consensual and non-consensual rough sex behaviors.
Consensual rough sex experiences:
Straight women 51.8%
Straight men 44.2%
Various gays 56.1% to 83.6%
Non-consensual rough sex experiences:
Straight women 18.3%
Straight men 15.1%
Various gays 20.7% to 33.4%
Has choked a partner with consent:
Straight women 8.7%
Straight men 3.8%
Various gays 9.5% to 42%
Has been choked without consent:
Straight women 4.3%
Straight men 2.2%
Various gays 5.1% to 13.5%
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12675731