Discussion about Bitcoin development http://bitcoincore.org http://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin http://twitter.com/BitcoinCoreOrg List in: @Crypto @CryptoCurrencies Rules: All participants require username & image set No altcoin/ICO discussion or promo
The attacker gained control of the "qix" NPM account and published malicious patch versions for some of the most fundamental utilities in JavaScript, [] core building blocks buried deep in the dependency trees of countless projects.
Speaking of ordinals, counterparty sorta got messed up over last year, I think thx to them. I hope they don't remove opt return limit.... Already I recall (Jeff garzick I think, edit too many years ago can't remember who) making that shitcoin which only used up btc block space, stupid fking idea. Anyway, there are alot of ppl that want to spam the chain and will do so easiest way possible. Concerning.
Читать полностью…good point, so jpegs wont even move to op_returns until discount is changed
Читать полностью…Not sure if Elisabeth Warren and her Operation Chokepoint goons will see it that way. And good luck explaining that nuance to no-coiners when the headlines start circulating. They don’t even know what a block is. They’ll think it’s all right ‘on the coin’. When it comes to jpeg viewers, sure you have a point, the burden of filtering will fall on them, partially... But the opportunity for anyone trying to attack bitcoin and spread a false/malevolent narrative is on easy-mode, and damage is permanent.
Читать полностью…You can also etch CP image (in binary) into the road, and then claim satelite maps distribute CP. Its just silly, but if you also provide/host/promote parsers you might be jailed.
Читать полностью…Can someone explain how when illegal media (you know what kind i mean) gets stored on chain when OP_RETURN limit is removed the following wont happen:
1 - governments will force institutions and large miners like antpool and foundry to abandon the tainted chain and propose a clean hard fork
2 - the tainted (original) chain will get blasted by media and regulators until no one wants to get associated by it
3 - the online safety act will be used as a weapon to attack BTC node runners and possibly block explorer infrastructure
Please explain to me why this risk is worth it and the core30 update is justified.
Were block hash checkpoints removed from Bitcoin Core implementation?
Читать полностью…if i need to digital sign for it and do drama so be it... i do not agree at all with the latest merge
Читать полностью…Try to sync a full node after block 710.000... I will soon take action against some moles in the project
Читать полностью…https://qubic.org/blog-detail/historic-takeover-complete-qubic-miners-now-secure-monero-network
Читать полностью…Hello sers! Anyone here looking for developers or designers by any chance?
Читать полностью…One solution is HD wallets (BIP32/44). It can generate many addresses from a single seed, & monitor them all by watching that xpub or address descriptor, using a bitcoin node or electrum server.
Читать полностью…I want to make a tg bot so that the user enters his name and bitcoin wallet, and then receives the address to which the bitcoins need to be transferred, and as soon as he has transferred them, I should receive a notification about this.
Читать полностью…Any UI/UX developer here interested in working with us on a bitcoin-only application?
Читать полностью…https://jdstaerk.substack.com/p/we-just-found-malicious-code-in-the
Читать полностью…There is always a reason for some new company that can be a Blockchain for XYZ shitcoin money.
I havnt run my full node in years but seems I have to start again.
Onchain jpegs are done via inscriptions, where they benefit from the witness discount. They have nothing to do with the op_return length filter.
Furthermore, there is essentially no way to stop jpegs, you'd have to make the chain permissioned.
Other than that, CP jpegs can (and probably are) already writen in the other parts of transactions, changing the OP_RETURN wont enable anything new in that regard, if anything, it will allow node runners to more easily prune CP out of their nodes (this assumes the jpeg etchers will be so nice to start using OP_RETURN again).
Читать полностью…Governments don't care if there is CP in logs, they care about software that displays it- so deployed web parsers, maybe even executables offered if they are promoted for CP use. So if you are making software to read it, make sure you enable filters and whatnot.
The simple answers is don't deploy jpeg viewers if you are not willing to censor what gets shown.
Everything else reads like a fantasy.
https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/qyId8Yto45M/m/3gQYLCBFDgAJ
Читать полностью…https://app.khoj.dev/share/chat/selfish-mining-qubic-s-pow-attack-and-crypto-futur-9c764cca/
Читать полностью…❗️New users are restricted until they ➡️ CLICK HERE ⬅️ and pass the captcha or be kicked.
Читать полностью…but the problem is that I don't understand how to do this if the addresses are constantly changing.
Читать полностью…how can I track a transaction on the blockchain if the addresses are constantly Chow can I track a transaction on the blockchain if adresses constantly changing
Читать полностью…DNS seeds (like seed.bitcoin.sipa.be) return a hardcoded or dynamically curated list of Bitcoin nodes. They don’t filter out the querying IP address
- Upon attempting a connection, if the destination IP matches the node’s known external IP, it avoids connecting.
- If a connection is established and the node detects that the remote peer is actually itself (e.g., via nonce check in version message), it drops the connection.
Relevant part in Bitcoin Core (net.cpp, CConnman::ConnectNode):
if (addr == self) {
LogPrint(..., "Skipping self-connection attempt to %s\n", addr.ToString());
return false;
}
if (remote_nonce == local_nonce) {
// Detected self-connection
pnode->fDisconnect = true;
}