1137
Link: @CplusplusQt Embedded: @EMBCpp • No DM without prior permission • Behave friendly • No NSFW • No Spam • No unauthorized Bots • Don't advertise other groups
:-1: error: A problem occurred configuring root project 'android-build-untitled1'.
> Could not resolve all artifacts for configuration ':classpath'.
> Could not find com.android.tools.build:gradle:8.6.0.
Searched in the following locations:
- https://dl.google.com/dl/android/maven2/com/android/tools/build/gradle/8.6.0/gradle-8.6.0.pom
- https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/android/tools/build/gradle/8.6.0/gradle-8.6.0.pom
Required by:
root project :
* Try:
> Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace.
> Run with --info or --debug option to get more log output.
> Run with --scan to get full insights.
> Get more help at https://help.gradle.org.
BUILD FAILED in 8s
Processional and Enterprise license will cost even more.
Читать полностью…
I have not personally used them, but attended regional Qt Meet (Qt Summits organised by Qt sales reps in Bangalore, India) where I have seen the demonstration. Qt for MCU libraries are light weight compared to the Qt for Application Development. Using QML looked super easy for developing embedded GUI. It used standard C++ libraries.
Читать полностью…
Nope, It is much easier with "Boot to Qt" and "Qt for MCU".
Infact the commercial license "Qt for Device Creation" is the major revenue generator for Qt Company.
Many MedTech and Automotive industries are using Qt for HMI compared to any other frameworks.
I have used C++ for STM32 MCUs and found it straightforward and easy but someone told me that thing about Qt. Not sure how true it is
Читать полностью…
Yes, that’s what I mean. Of course it is c++, but you can almost create an app without knowing much of ”normal” c++. The Qt libraries are does almost everything that the .net or java standard libraries do (at least the important stuff) and they integrate with each other as you would expect from a standard library.
Читать полностью…
It is also very complicated to learn. The license is sometimes hard to pay. There are modules that if you use them, you would have to license your entire project under GPL and look for third-party libraries. It is a mature technology, but there are other options such as Slint.
Читать полностью…
autodesk maya and ida pro and many more have qt as their UI
Читать полностью…
I like it too - a lot. But my job isn't related to software development at all, and I just do it as a hobby.
Читать полностью…
It is better to write web projects using Node, React and Next.
Читать полностью…
:-1: error: FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
* What went wrong:
Most of my prior and current projects use STM32 MCUs for which I use STM32CubeIDE plus C++.
You think Qt for MCU is still a good alternative for them?
Welcome to the group, @Arkenil! :-)
Wanna share your story of how you started with Qt, QML or C++? Maybe some nice feature that made you stick with it.
Rules are set on the description of the group. :)
I haven’t really used it, but I think you have to compare it to the alternatives. Embedded can be challenging.
Читать полностью…
That’s right, but there’s much stuff starting with Q (eg QString, Qvector and so on) that aren’t identical with standard C++.
Qt is a framework but I guess it doesn’t dislike to look a little like kinda language.
Qt is a cross-platform application development framework. It is not a language. It is C++ based. You can also use languages QML (by Qt) and Javascript.
Using Qt, you can build:
- Desktop applications
- Mobile applications
- Hybrid Applications
- Embedded/IoT systems
- Automotive HMIs
- Industrial control systems
It’s a framework, and not a small one. It doesn’t claim to be a language (and of course it’s all c++), but to an outsider a qt application can look more like c# than c++.
Читать полностью…
Qt is a technology like cars or smartphones. Having a car and general driving skills does not mean you will get a job on an F1 team. They are only developing technology.
Читать полностью…
You came to tell us that React is better than Qt for the web? What's the point?
Читать полностью…
Yes. i agree. But Qt covers a wide range of languages and techs for developing apps and so on.
Читать полностью…