You're right. C# and netcore are open source and multiplatform. In addition for desktop you can use Avalonia or UNO frameworks , they are multiplatform and open source to.
Читать полностью…C# is a way to monopolize the object-oriented language market. C# is a bad choice and it will never become cross platform.
Читать полностью…Exactly, take for example Denuvo, it's extremely hard to decompile, but not impossible
But, it protects the game for the necessary period of time, which is the sales one
I’m not up to date on these, but obfuscation can only make it harder to decompile. Perhaps much harder, but probably not impossible.
Читать полностью…Same thing for drivers installers etc
Internet download manager allows completely offline check got a license, that's true, but it updates frequently so they "catch up" I would say?
no, i have a python version of it and i do sell it by license id , also i wrote a piece of codes that generate hwid on any os , mac, linux , and windows, customers able to run it on 5 devices only , the API is embedded in the script so i was wondering
Читать полностью…A desktop app being cracked is already a lost battle. Is it possible to change the business model to a subscription based one?
Читать полностью…can i ask this question, i'm thinking of coding a desktop application, but i'm not certain as to which language should use , whether c# or c++, for c# i'm scared it will be cracked soon and c++, i scared it will take me longer, do u think we have any obfuscation techniques for c# i can purchase or learn or what addvise can any give me?
Читать полностью…https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qtreeview.html#signals
https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qabstractitemview.html#signals
Best is double clicked or when you press enter
I need some help please with https://godbolt.org/z/sr884jf11 I try to view treeview in good way, How I can fix this ?
Читать полностью…I’m not saying it’s a good choice (in all situations), but it is open source and cross platform.
Читать полностью…Yes the common ones get deobfuscated easily
https://github.com/NotPrab/.NET-Obfuscator?tab=readme-ov-file#open-source
But I would go with this list, unless your product has a lot of value, I would not use a paid one
if they're obfuscated can be trusted , i can go with cus i search online and i only saw confusex or something but just recently i saw video on youtube on how to deobfuscate it , i got scared
Читать полностью…But yeah using C++ will only delay the time it takes to crack but not protect it. For the speed of development I would go with C# and a simple open-source obfuscator...
Читать полностью…Yeah take for example revo Uninstaller pro, nowadays you only get the latest definitions/database for uninstallling programs if your account has a valid key at the backend server
Читать полностью…That's what Adobe etc did, they just throwed the towel and only send offline installers of their apps nowadays behind huge business contracts
Читать полностью…C# is actually cross platform nowadays, but only the core language. The default graphical frameworks (windows forms and WPF) are windows only. There are others though.
Читать полностью…AFAIK, C# is for MS Windows only, so if you aim at cross-platforming then go for C++.
I'm not using C# but have seen code in it at times and guess C++ needs less code.
can i ask this question, i'm thinking of coding a desktop application, but i'm not certain as to which language should use , whether c# or c++, for c# i'm scared it will be cracked soon and c++, i scared it will take me longer, do u think we have any obfuscation techniques for c# i can purchase or learn or what addvise can any give me?
Читать полностью…@eng_amreisa do you want it exactly like that, or is there something specific in you current solution that needs improvement?
Читать полностью…Welcome to the group, @AliKhanhp! :-)
Wanna share your story of how you started with Qt, QML or C++? Maybe some nice feature that made you stick with it.
Rules are set on the description of the group. :)