20036
๐ฒ Contact โ @CurrentLegalGKBOT ๐จโโ๏ธ Law vs. Logic: Lessons from Experience. Get clear answers to legal issues, skill-building tips, case briefs, and simplified explanations of the latest enactments. ๐ง Daily Quiz โ @LegalQuizzes โณ๐ Enjoy Learning!
#MAXIM
Acta Exteriora Indicant Interiora Secreta
๐ฝ Can you interpret the Changes in Lady Justice.
What are the origins of old statue
Personally speaking- Though there might be a little POV change in the minds of future generation that there is more active and humane legal justice system is present than the earlier estimated scales one, however currently it is Merely an act which is purporting to be a change in jurisprudence, overhauling ๐ซจ
Inquisitorial System is coming?
@CurrentLegalGK
The Delhi High Court said this year that in POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act cases where the age of the victim is determined through an ossification test, the upper age in the testโs reference range should be considered, and a โmargin of error of two years is required to be appliedโ.
ะงะธัะฐัั ะฟะพะปะฝะพัััั…
How bone ossification test works, and its application in law ๐
#baba_siddique #explained_law #lawrence_bishnoi
Just a contention.
Is there any law prohibiting furgitive to approach under article 32?
The news about the BCI recommendations on Stipend amount is promising, but in practice, there will likely be a negligible number of advocates who implement them. However, I hope to be proven wrong in this regard in future.
@CurrentLegalGK
Canada-India row: When Indira Gandhi took up Khalistan issue with Justin Trudeauโs father ๐
#express_explained
Exhibiting any part of the body with the intention that it would be seen by a child would amount to sexual harassment.
Read facts of case and see how court has applied them...
@CurrentLegalGK
'Deposing Capacity' Of Child Witness Not Tested Before Taking Evidence: Patna HC Nixes Man's Conviction For Sexually Assaulting Minor Girl
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/patna-high-court/patna-high-court-s6-pocso-act-for-incriminating-evidence-want-from-victim-parents-appellant-cannot-convicted-feeble-evidence-child-witness-272476
๐ #Tip
Complete the Provisions from Bare Act first then focus on Case laws, the Connectivity would be much higher and in time effective manner.
Speed ๐ is the key nowadays.
Supreme Court Refuses To Entertain Plea To Criminalise Sexual Offences Against Men, Trans Persons & Animals In BNS
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-entertain-plea-to-criminalise-sexual-offences-against-men-trans-persons-animals-in-bns-272371
'Art 29 Does Not Give Right To Claim TV Langauge Channel' : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea For Doordarshan Channel In Sindhi
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/art-29-does-not-give-right-to-claim-tv-langauge-channel-supreme-court-dismisses-plea-for-doordarshan-channel-in-sindhi-272348
๐ #Question
Whether Intention is Required or there is strict liability in the cases of:-
1. Section 292 IPC, 1860
2. Section 3/4 of IRWA, 1986
Mention Case laws to support your answers.
(2 Marks) (50 words)
@CurrentLegalGK
A gazette notification to this effect was issued by the Union Home Ministry.
"In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 73 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of 2019) read with Articles 239 and 239A of the Constitution of India, the order dated the 31st October, 2019 in relation to the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir shall stand revoked immediately before the appointment of the chief minister under Section 54 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019," the notification signed by President Droupadi Murmu said.
@CurrentLegalGK
75 Important Judgments Of Supreme Court: Part III | Celebrating 75 Years Of India's Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/list-of-all-important-supreme-court-judgments-272293
'Lived Like Husband-Wife For 5 Years' : Supreme Court Quashes Case Alleging Rape On False Marriage Promise
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/lived-like-husband-wife-for-5-years-supreme-court-quashes-case-alleging-rape-on-false-marriage-promise-272668
๐ฏ๐บ๏ธ๐ เคเคฎเคชเฅ เคเฅ เคเฅเคฅเฅ เคตเคฐเฅเคฒเฅเคก เคนเฅเคฐเคฟเคเฅเค เคธเคพเคเค เคฌเคจเฅเคเฅ โโโโโโโเคฐเคพเคฎเคฐเคพเคเคพ เคเฅ เคจเคเคฐเฅ: เคฏเฅเคจเฅเคธเฅเคเฅ เคจเฅ เคเคฐเคเคพ เคเฅ เคฎเคเคเฅเคฐเฅ เคฆเฅ; เคเคเฅเคฐเคพเคนเฅ เคฎเคเคฆเคฟเคฐ, เคญเฅเคฎเคฌเฅเคเคเคพ, เคธเคพเคเคเฅ เคธเฅเคคเฅเคช เคชเคนเคฒเฅ เคธเฅ เคถเคพเคฎเคฟเคฒ
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/4EeR8va1JNb
FOR M.P. GK ( MP JUDICIAL SERVICE)
Abetment of suicide: why SC cautioned against โunnecessary prosecutionsโ ๐
#explained_law #express_explained
NCPCR wants states to stop funding madrasas: how Keralaโs system is different ๐
#express_explained #kerala_madrasas #madrasa
Fugitive Cannot Maintain Article 32 Petition: SG Objects To Zakir Naik's Plea In Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/fugitive-cannot-maintain-article-32-petition-sg-objects-to-zakir-naiks-plea-in-supreme-court-272612
Section 3 mentions "A person is said to have Notice" (notice is not defined rather when a person will have notice, the effect is mentioned)
Section 131 too does not define Notice it is just mentioning that for Transfer of Actionable claim every Notice must be signed.
Word Notice in itself not defined anywhere.
You can anytime counter this as it is not an answer key by High Court which requires fees.
Comment ๐
๐ฅ #Question
What is the difference between an Interpretation Clause and a Definition Clause.
Think why some acts does not have definition clause instead interpretation clause.
Having Sexual Intercourse, Being Naked In Front Of Minor Amounts To Sexual Harassment U/S 11 Of POCSO Act: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-having-sexual-intercourse-being-naked-infront-of-minor-amounts-sexual-harassment-under-pocso-act-272473
Can You mention the Reasoning?
I have chosen Option D ๐
@CurrentLegalGK
"This court cannot by recourse under article 142 direct that a particular act constitutes an offence. Such exercise falls under parliamentary domain,"ย the CJI observed in the order so dictated.ย
The Petitioner relied upon the decision of the Top Court inย P Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnatakaย where it was observed that in the presence of lacuna in law, the Court can pass suitable guidelines.
What's your opinion?
@CurrentLegalGK
S.52 TP Act | Once Transaction Is Hit By Lis Pendens, Bona Fide Purchase Or Lack Of Notice Of Agreement Not Defences : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/s52-tp-act-once-transaction-is-hit-by-lis-pendens-bona-fide-purchase-or-lack-of-notice-of-agreement-not-defences-supreme-court-272377
๐ #Quote
"Freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think are means indispensable to the discovery and spread of the political truth."-
~Justice Louis Brandeis
Article 19 freedom of speech and expression and their restrictions, on importance of Article 19 see Romesh thappar and Maneka gandhi case.
๐จโโ๏ธ๐ Q and A with CJI D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
Must Watch.
Live streaming Part of discussion deliberation dialogue democracy.
https://youtu.be/CHvzLJ1iXic?feature=shared
Also Humanising the law Address:
https://youtu.be/X5XyS0EUPXk?feature=shared
โ๏ธ๐จโโ๏ธ๐ฉโโ๏ธ Women Rights upholding Landmark Judgments
20. Deli Domestic Working Women's' Forum v. Union Of India (1994) "The complaints of sexual assault cases should be provided with legal representation."
21.Uttarakhand Mahila Kalyan Parishad v.State Of UP(1995): "No justification for women teachers being paid less or having fewer promotional avenues than their male counterparts."
22.Mrs.Neera Mathur v.LIC(1991): "The Court directed LIC to delete columns demanding personal disclosures from lady candidates regarding pregnancy-related issues."
23.State Of Maharashtra & Anr.v.Madhukar Narayan Mardikar(1990): "Even a woman of easy virtue is entitled to privacy and no one can invade her privacy as and when he likes."
24.Mackinnon Mackenzie & Co Ltd vs Audrey D'Costa & Anr(1987): "There is no custom or rule that only ladies can be Confidential Stenographers; equal remuneration must be provided regardless of gender."
25.Mrs.Mary Roy v.State Of Kerala & Ors.(1986): "No personal law can be held above the Constitution of India; discriminatory succession provisions were declared void."
26.Air India v.Nargesh Meerza(1981): "The clauses regarding retirement and pregnancy under Regulation 46 were held unconstitutional and therefore struck down."
27. CB Muthamma v.Union Of India(1979): "If a woman has to obtain permission from the government before marriage then the same set of reasoning is also applicable to men."
28. V.Tulasamma & Ors vs V.Sesha Reddi(1977): "A Hindu female's right to maintenance is not an empty formality but is a tangible right against property which flows from the spiritual relationship between husband and wife.
29. B Shah v.Presiding Officer,Labor Court(1977): "Computation of maternity benefit is to be made for all days including Sundays and rest days which may be wageless holidays comprised in actual absence up to six weeks before and after delivery.
30. Bombay Labour Union v.International Franchise Pvt.Ltd.(1965): "The court upheld that unmarried women were required to give up service on marriage was held unconstitutional."
@CurrentLegalGK