Unofficial fan channel for Existential Comics official website existentialcomics.com I'm NOT the author of the webcomic, I just forward it on telegram
Yes, life is suffering, but look on the bright side: it is short.
Читать полностью…If i could travel back in time i would give Hitler a printout of the wikipedia page of logical fallacies to help improve his critical thinking abilities, thus preventing the Holocaust.
Читать полностью…"I'll give you some techniques to use whenever you are having thoughts about gnawing void at the heart of our existence."
Читать полностью…"But I could have equally thought it was great. Fifty fifty really."
Читать полностью…A lot of right wing people have this strange idea that "postmodernism" is destroying, or possible has already destroyed, Western Civilization. They seem to define postmodernism as a kind of relativity where "everything is as true as everything else", and has infected every school and institution. This is quite clearly divorced from reality in several important ways:
1. postmodernism has a minor influence on American intellectual and cultural institution, at best.
2. no one in history, postmodern theorists included, has believed that "everything is as true as everything else".
3. perhaps most importantly, postmodern theorists thought "postmodernism" was bad. They weren't advocating for it!
Jean François Lyotard, who coined the term, saw a broad movement in the culture where the majority of the intellectuals and the population at large no longer believed in "grand metanarratives". That is to say, people no longer believed that history was moving towards one great goal for all of humanity, whether that was a sort of scientific and philosophical enlightenment offered up by Hegel, or something like communism. Instead, the goals of society were becoming increasingly fractured, and even the production of knowledge itself was becoming fractured. Many scientific theories were becoming increasingly specialized and focused on industry, and becoming incommensurable with other theories (that is to say scientists in one specialty couldn't even communicate or translate their theories into a language that could be understood by other specialists).
If you are interested in understand what Lyotard actually believed, rather than what right wing conspiracy theorists claim, you can read The Postmodern Condition. Nah, I'm just kidding, don't read it. He is a terrible writer and it's extremely difficult to read. The best way to understand it is to have an extremely french woman read it for you and explain it to you.
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Question - Existential Comics
Читать полностью…Hobbes, Locke, and Very Silly Hats - Existential Comics
Читать полностью…Philosophy at the Olympics - Existential Comics
Читать полностью…Calvin and Thomas Hobbes - Existential Comics
Читать полностью…The History of Philosophy From the Perspective of Chicken Enchiladas - Existential Comics
Читать полностью…Philosophers Rebuild Society - Existential Comics
Читать полностью…Galileo and the Empirical Technique - Existential Comics
Читать полностью…A Day in the Life of Arthur Schopenhauer - Existential Comics
Читать полностью…Kierkegaard Goes to Therapy - Existential Comics
Читать полностью…"Also, wasn't Western Civilization already destroyed by Elvis Presley's gyrating hips?"
Читать полностью…"But Dumbledore, how does that make us the good guys?"
"Don't you know anything, Harry? The good guys are the ones to preserve the oligarchic status quo."
This is actually why there was a ministry of silly walks in Monty Python, because they live in an alternate universe where Hobbes's theory of Leviathan became the dominant political text of the 20th century.
Читать полностью…Also has anyone tried running really fast away from capitalists and getting them to chase you over a cliff? Could work.
Читать полностью…"But what really does it mean to be the best? It fuckin' rules, that's what it means."
Читать полностью…Of course Hobbes was named after Thomas Hobbes, but Bill Watterson was too much of an intellectual coward to have the majority of the comics be based around the Leviathan.
Читать полностью…"Actually Wittgenstein there is a clear difference, enchiladas have sauce on top and are eaten with a fork."
"Ahhh, well, nonetheless though..."
"See this is why the ideal republic has a horde of simpletons, who we lie to and they do all the hard work for us."
Читать полностью…to be fair looking at stuff and writing down what you see is a pain in the ass
Читать полностью…Karl Marx's concept of commodity fetishism (fetish here meaning "to imbue with mystical properties", it has nothing to do with sexual fetishes), goods sold in the marketplace under capitalism obscure the relationship between workers who create them for their use value. Despite believing that communism would ultimately do away with marketplaces, Marx actually loved the ideal of the marketplace as described by capitalist economists, wherein workers produce various things that are useful to other people and exchange them using money as a mediator, organically organizing labor for everyone's benefit. In theory, the baker would produce bread for everyone and the carpenter would build things, and the amount of labor put in would indicate the price of the good (this is called the labor theory of value, which he got from Adam Smith). For example, if people noticed that carpenters were making twice as much money as bakers, more people would become carpenters, diluting the market and eventually the amount of labor and money earned would equalize over time (it turns out some prices can't be explained this way, but it does explain a lot). The problem was, this marketplace doesn't exist, because there is a third person: the capitalist. Not only that, but he owns and controls everyone's labor. So commodities actually end up not being produced for use by other people at all and exchanged in a fair marketplace, they are produced solely for the capitalist's profit, and this only loosely corresponds to the wants and desires of the consumers. For example, supermarkets will throw away food that is expired, and actively guard the discarded food to prevent people from eating it (we saw this just recently in Portland during a Blizzard, where the police were preventing people from "looting" food that had been thrown away). This is completely irrational behavior, because the entire purpose of growing food was for human consumption. So why do they do it? Because it is "rational" for maximizing their profits: it keeps the price higher for the goods on the shelf (it's also irrational to want higher prices, rationally we should all want cheaper goods, but again the capitalist's interest is directly against that of society here). The market is distorted, and the goods themselves become distorted because capitalists (and even consumers in the end) only see the goods as having exchange value, in other words, I can exchange 80 oranges for 1 chair. Lost in all this, however, is why the oranges and chairs were produced to begin with. The capitalists themselves don't even care why they were produced, they only care if they will turn a profit, so the goods and services become mere abstractions to them. In this way, the rational market, which organizes specialized labor in a way to exchange it for other specialized labor to satisfy all of our needs can never, and will never exist under capitalism. At least according to Marx.
Читать полностью…