great questions!
tokenization helps to the initial governance of the particular AI by the token holders. tokenization can help to train AI incentivizing datasets, inference costs, etc.
Sovereignty is the next step where holders can decide to let the AI take full control and ownership of the decisions.
The idea of having onchain the AIs is to have access to wallets and defi primitives that would require trust third parties with the possibility of bad actors 😊
Thanks. Im not so sure this is super convincing though? Re tokenization: why would you want to tokenize something like this? If your AI agent is a black box, other people have to trust that it works. That's gonna be tough. If its not a black box people can just copy your agent. So I'm not sure man.
Читать полностью…Hmm. I think that's the same? Frax protocol revenue is good for FXS holders, not FRAX (the stablecoin) owners.
Читать полностью…Is it subject to more risk? Of course. Will I like it? Absolutely not.. But it's not that new and I'm ok with that risk elsewhere.
Читать полностью…Hello 👋
I have a community
I want to partnership + AMA etc with this project. I will contact whomever at TG directly regarding this matter?
Let’s market your project at the Asia Chinese spaces, get them alot of Chinese attendance and also management will guide them to make registeration.
Читать полностью…There's a sudden splurge of interest in using stables as faster mode of settlement and day to day transactions. How would $frxUSD position itself to capture this new wave ? I understand you are developing on/off-ramp through Paxos.
But would it help $frxUSD to get mainstream(outside of onchain) ? Would Frax support any teams developing dApps in this space ?
@samkazemian
everything in crypto is tokenized, agents included. you’re right, in the current stage there are tech limitations. still, ATP is a great starting playground for future agent tech advancements that Frax is working on
Читать полностью…From IQ's blog post..
Platform Features and Applications:
Agent Deployment: ATP allows the transformation of AI models into autonomous agents for diverse applications, ranging from DeFi operations to content creation.
Tokenization & Growth: Users can tokenize agents to create networks of co-owners that support development and share in success. Agents can manage a portion of their tokens and interact with DeFi autonomously.
Decentralized Sovereignty: ATP agents function independently without control by a single entity, ensuring sustained resilience and fostering innovation across the blockchain.
Still, people holding stables bridged through that specific bridge have to take on that risk with no actual benefit... I can understand this in something like FPI as it is fundamental to the product, not with actual chain infrastructure.
Читать полностью…right. AMO is a bit more advanced. but my point is that, a bridge is basically a stable coin protocol. They finally figure out they can get some yield (revenue) out of this.
Читать полностью…It is very different, AMOs can mint and burn FRAX with a cap set by governance. Basically works like a PID controller and stablecoin reserves are not involved at all in this.
Читать полностью…https://x.com/0xPolygonFdn/status/1867225177702170974?t=er-tnPveaUGUZUGdeyryuA&s=35
Читать полностью…Hi all, what is the best bridge to bridge to Fraxtal from other EVMs besides mainnet?
Читать полностью…Ethereum (ETH) Token Overview
💵 Price: $3,893.97
📈 1h: +0.17%
📉 24h: -0.65%
📈 7d: +0.14%
🏙️ MCap: 2nd | 470B
💧 Vol: 42B
🧠 Powered by IQGPT.com
What's the main benefit of ATP vs AI agents that interact at the user level (not integrated in the blockchain)? All api endpoints are known anyway, right?
Читать полностью…It won’t end then
It’s just the point when it should be clear what you get exactly