This isn't actually contradictory at all even though it might sound counterintuitive. You can have tx's costing $.001 and the chain still making 8-9 figures in fees because of incredibly high activity just like Solana.
Читать полностью…Perhaps repo destruction is more effective than fns and gas, the question is whether revenue will grow steadily, we have been behind the cr recovery for a long time
Читать полностью…Is a bit contradictory selling that gas fees will be almost 0 and that a core part of FBE will be the change to pay gas fees with Frax commodity token
Читать полностью…So what you are saying is that frax cap will increase and protocol is using revenue to buyback and burn?
Читать полностью…All these users are extremely valuable and important members of the community, especially long lockers and participants here. But they're not enough buy demand by themselves to get the token performance that they want to see. In order to get there, FXS has to have massive visibility to millions in Korea, Asia, and CEXes. Not just the onchain defi community.
Читать полностью…Users who have been with the agreement for four years just don't want to go through the pain of the past few years over and over again.
As the community has said, frax is a lottery ticket, but it has not been able to cash in.At least for now.
think due to the current token performance and market feedback, it is understandable that the community is facing a vague coin cap supply panic, if it is determined that the 100 million cap, then these fud will naturally disappear
Читать полностью…This kind of rhetoric doesn't help at all. It was explained above the security budget we're thinking of is so low that it is 'minimum viable issuance' meaning that amount could potentially even be burned in year 1, so no more than ETH's own rate of small single digit immutable emissions. No one in their right mind would think that is excessive, in fact, it is literally as low as tokenomic design will allow. What did people think, we would be stupid enough to like double the supply? Cmon..
Читать полностью…If the upper limit is increased, it will dilute the FXS in people's hands. Currently, the price of FXS is low, and if we want to increase the issuance volume, it will be a disaster!
Читать полностью…I think you're misunderstanding what the proposal is, the proposal is low single digit emission with burns, almost identical to ETH but decreasing emissions even faster. Nearly all the current FXS is allocated already so where would the security budget come from otherwise? If people really think this is unreasonable, I don't know what to say other than to make your voice heard and vote+post when the proposal is up.
Читать полностью…I think we will very soon, especially on Fraxtal after the launch of IQ APT and our AIVM 🤖
Читать полностью…You just need some things that heavily promote trading/swapping like the BAMM and perps, onchain AI agents tx's, etc
Читать полностью…I think FBE biggest contribution should be a small % of the more used frax products, swap, borrow/lending
Читать полностью…Can you explain why the cap needs to increase and can’t achieve the same outcome with the current 100m cap?
Читать полностью…No disrespect to the team, Korea is definitely an important market, do we need a US centric BD, because innovation, money market policies are currently in the US, and currently our BD is not expanding in the core area of crypto, the US
Читать полностью…But anyway, this group isn't meant for price discussion but wanted to be upfront about token performance since you brought it up. I agree it's something we have to improve as it is far beyond "product" and much more about lack of visibility in key markets.
Читать полностью…Well hopefully the above answers clearly settled that concern. The whole point of the new system is to lower all emissions and cap it , not the opposite.
And not to get into price because it's not for this channel, but I think really the source of that isn't about products, it's lack of CEX expansions and lack of Korean market expansion. We can take some of the blame there. To be honest, it's not our expertise which isn't an excuse. We'd love to hire an extremely experienced VP for CEX integrations+Korean market expansion. That alone would 10x the mcap, look at MOVE, ONDO, etc with big Asian market visibility.
To put in perspective how low of emissions this is, the current annual revenue is about 4x the proposed tail emissions. That means if you used the protocol revenue to buy back and burn today, it would remove 4x as much supply as what we plan to propose as emissions. Assuming voters approve it, FXS could be immensely deflationary even at the current revenue numbers today. So please just chill, and wait for the gov proposals to start rolling out and discuss them in the official forum. 🙏
Читать полностью…The maximum supply of FXS is one hundred million pieces, which is already sufficient. Do we still need to issue more shares to mess things up?
Читать полностью…