YouTube reversed its ban and confirmed there had not been any "hate speech" on my channel
- I am not sure what happened. However, I was interviewed by the excellent Professor Jeffrey Sachs for his book club about my most recent book on world order. Professor Sachs said towards the end of the interview that he would see what he could do about reversing my ban, and the next day I was back on the platform
- My point of departure in any international security analysis is the security competition. Mutual understanding and recognition of competing security concerns are imperative to mitigate security competition and pursue peace. I therefore always tell my students not to hate their adversaries as it results in poor politics and diminished security. The idea that I would engage in "hate speech" is absurd
Our discussion with investor legend Jim Rogers - The Impending Meltdown of the US-led Global Economy and the Emergence of Alternatives
https://open.substack.com/pub/glenndiesen/p/the-impending-economic-meltdown-with?r=ddqut&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Jeffrey Sachs speaks about Sergey Lavrov. It is a great shame how diplomacy has been criminalized. To speak with adversaries is considered to "legitimise" them, and it has become obligatory to denigrate and demonise the other side to deprive them of legitimacy
Читать полностью…
https://braveneweurope.com/glenn-diesen-american-censorship-intensifies-in-the-information-war
Читать полностью…
John Kerry says First Amendment is the enemy, as elites try to stamp out free speech
- There is no need for free speech and a marketplace of ideas, as the US government will tell us what is true
- Kerry's dark comments come as American censorship intensify
https://nypost.com/2024/10/02/opinion/john-kerry-says-first-amendment-is-the-enemy-as-elites-try-to-stamp-out-free-speech/
NATO expansion is the source of the war and the territorial dispute is the symptom of the war - so why would the Russians accept a "land-for-NATO" peace agreement?
- At the Istanbul negotiations, Russia offered Ukraine the return of its land for neutrality.
- Russia considers NATO expansion to Ukraine to be an existential threat, which is why there is a war. NATO can disagree with Russia's assessment but there cannot be any doubt that this is the view of Russia that it will act upon. There is overwhelming evidence for this and no serious scholar can deny it.
- The need to preserve NATO's war narrative results in a lot of harmful self-delusion as important facts must be ignored. Paths to peace are ignored and the war is continuously escalated.
A prank call to Pompeo reveals a simplistic mindset in Washington: The US will bring Russia closer to Europe after the Ukraine War to split Russia from China
- First the goal was to destroy Russia and then go after China. Now that the war will obviously be won by Russia, the plan is to turn Russia against China?
- These people should improve their intelligence analysis and watch less Games of Thrones. Moscow will not flip after the US contributed to the killing of tens of thousands of Russians, while China helped Russia in its hour of need. Also, if the US can knock out China, then the US would turn on Russia.
- The great irony is that from Gorbachev's Common European Home in the 1980s to Putin's Greater Europe lasting until 2014, the main strategic objective of Russia was to integrate with the West/Europe
- Russia has now replaced Greater Europe with Greater Eurasia. It pursues a multipolar system, which translates into a multi vector foreign policy to diversify its economic connectivity
My YouTube channel was permanently banned, so please follow me on Telegram, Rumble and RuTube
https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/american-censorship-intensifies-in
I have now been suspended permanently from YouTube as their AI identified "hate speech". Yes, this is the dystopian reality we live in.
Please follow me on Rumble instead:
https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all
My participation in Geopolitical Economy Hour with Radhika Desai and Michael Hudson
https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/10/01/nato-russia-china-jens-stoltenberg/
https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/the-nord-stream-anniversary-and-europes
Читать полностью…
https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/brics-develops-a-multipolar-economic
Читать полностью…
https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/the-end-of-hegemony-and-emergence
Читать полностью…
https://peoplesdaily.pdnews.cn/china/er/30046600278
Читать полностью…
When I was told that the YouTube purge had begun, I opened a RUtube account (Russian YouTube) and transferred all my videos there. To all my Russian friends, please consider following this channel:
https://rutube.ru/channel/34861858/videos/
Why have digital ecosystems become imperative for economic leadership, military supremacy, political influence, and dominance in the information war?
- Much like during the First Industrial Revolution in the 19th century, political sovereignty in the Fourth Industrial Revolution requires technological and industrial sovereignty
- The book was published in 2021, but all developments continue as predicted
https://www.amazon.com/Great-Politics-Fourth-Industrial-Revolution/dp/0755607007,
Our discussion with Glenn Greenwald about the anti-Russian propaganda that deprives us of rational debate and analysis
https://rumble.com/v4zp2a3-nato-escalation-and-propaganda-takes-us-to-war-glenn-greenwald-alexander-me.html
Why the War in Ukraine is Meant to Drag On: Strategic Goals, European Discontent, and NATO’s Role
https://braveneweurope.com/michael--on-strategic-goals-european-discontent-and-natos-role
My YouTube account was deleted/banned in the current YouTube purge
- Please consider following my Rumble, Substack, or supporting my podcast through GoFundMe
https://glenndiesen.substack.com/
https://rumble.com/user/GlennDiesen/videos
https://gofund.me/c49aae54
As my YouTube channel was banned for no reason, I am reposting some of the links again. By request, here is the video on Russophobia:
https://rumble.com/v5erk65-russophobia-historically-considered-prof-glenn-diesen-interviewed-by-prof-d.html
Without a soft veto in institutions, states use military power as a hard veto:
- After the Cold War, Russia was excluded from the main institutions of Europe. Europe would be organised under NATO and the EU, and eventually all of Europe would be members except Russia as the largest state in Europe. We then made it a slogan that Russia does not have a veto over our institutions. What could possibly go wrong?
- It turns out that not allowing Russia to defend its vital security interests with an institutional voice does not result in Russia abandoning its national security interests. It results in Russia being left only with the military option.
- The great powers were given veto powers in the UN Security Council so they could bloc with a vote rather than with military power. Removing the veto will not change their willingness to defend strategic interests, it will only give them fewer and more dangerous tools.
https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/the-crisis-of-modernity-and-liberalism
Читать полностью…
A Nuclear War in Ukraine Is a Distinct Possibility: C.J. Polychroniou Interviews Professor Glenn
https://open.substack.com/pub/glenndiesen/p/a-nuclear-war-in-ukraine-is-a-distinct?r=ddqut&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
BRICS Meeting in Kazan to Develop Economic Architecture for the Multipolar World - Jeffrey Sachs, Alexander Mercouris & Glenn Diesen
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pSa4xKCV3r8
https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/natos-destruction-of-ukraine-under
Читать полностью…
NATO prepares to attack Russia: Has the military bloc blinded itself with incrementalism and sloganeering?
https://open.substack.com/pub/glenndiesen/p/an-act-of-war-against-russia-putins?r=ddqut&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
