597
✅ Welcome to the channel 📌 300+ Successful Students ⚡️ 3 years of experience in Teaching ⭐️ Only Quality Content 📝PM: @I_am_jalol
❗️Even most of the IELTS instructors spend more than 40 minutes to finish the reading part.
✅Me? Well, usually it takes me between 23 - 34 minutes to finish completely (40/40 or in worst case 39/40)
I've just tested my reading speed being as strict and critical as positive.
✅Guess what, My reading speed was 463 words per minute
Oh, I forgot that some of you don't even read 1 page a day
Читать полностью…
🎓Blue eyes may be better for reading in dim light than brown eyes
#article
@teacherjalol
I hope you guys are reading these masterpieces written by me and getting useful arguments )
Читать полностью…
✅Some people like to spend their leisure time with their colleagues, while others prefer to keep their private life separate from their work life.
Is it a good thing to spend leisure time with a colleague?
In today’s fast-paced and interconnected world, how we spend our leisure time can greatly impact our overall well-being. While some individuals prefer to keep their professional and private lives separate, others find value in spending free time with their colleagues. In this essay, I will present arguments supporting the notion that spending leisure time with colleagues can be a positive and enriching experience.
One of the primary advantages of spending leisure time with colleagues is the potential to strengthen team cohesion and foster collaboration.Engaging in activities outside of the workplace provides an opportunity for individuals to develop stronger bonds, build trust, and establish open lines of communication. These social interactions can lead to improved teamwork and cooperation when working on professional projects. For instance, engaging in team-building exercises or group outings can promote a sense of harmony, which positively influences workplace dynamics and productivity.
Another significant benefit of spending free time with colleagues is the chance to expand one’s professional network and exchange knowledge and ideas. Informal social settings often provide a relaxed atmosphere where individuals can engage in meaningful conversations beyond work-related matters. This can lead to the exchange of valuable insights, industry trends, and best practices that may not arise during formal work interactions. Moreover, establishing strong relationships with colleagues outside of work can cultivate a supportive environment for professional growth and development.
Moreover, engaging in leisure time activities with colleagues can also contribute to stress relief and promote a healthier work-life balance. Work-related stress is a common concern in today’s competitive workplaces, and spending free time with colleagues can offer a respite from the demands of the job. Engaging in shared hobbies or recreational activities can provide a much-needed break, allowing individuals to recharge and return to work with renewed focus and motivation. Also, a healthier work-life balance achieved through leisure time with colleagues can lead to increased job satisfaction and overall well-being.
In conclusion, while some individuals prefer to maintain a clear boundary between their private and professional lives, spending leisure time with colleagues can provide numerous benefits. Enhanced team cohesion, improved collaboration, expanded professional networks, and stress relief are just a few of the advantages that can arise from investing time in socializing and engaging in leisure activities with colleagues. By promoting positive working relationships and fostering a supportive work environment, such interactions contribute to both personal and professional growth.
(395 words) - Inclass Practice
#writing_task_2
@teacherjalol
📹Why is it so hard to escape poverty?
@teacherjalol
📌 Overall - 7.0
⚡️ Listening - 8.0
⚡️ Reading - 8.0
🔥 Writing - 6.5
🔥 Speaking - 6.0
#result
@teacherjalol
Here We Go🔥
The Very First Result Of 2024...
Ahror has completed my intensive Listening and Reading Course (as you probably noticed from sub sections)
I don't like counting past results.
Every new year - a new count.
✅Yes, I agree that we still can find a specific usage or benefit from AI.
However, I believe that one day it's gonna be the main reason why we won't exist in this planet anymore...
✅Topic from: 27.01.2024 (BC/IDP)
It is better for people to be unemployed than people to be employed but they do not enjoy.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In my opinion, I disagree with the statement that it is better for people to be unemployed than for them to be employed but not enjoy their work. Being employed, even if one does not enjoy their job, has several advantages that outweigh the negative aspects. In this essay, I will outline the reasons why and provide examples to support my viewpoint.
Firstly, being employed provides individuals with financial stability. Having a job means earning a regular income, which is crucial for meeting basic needs such as food, shelter, and healthcare. Unemployment, on the other hand, often leads to financial insecurity and reliance on government support or savings. For example, a study conducted by the International Labour Organization found that in countries with high unemployment rates, individuals faced difficulties in meeting their basic needs, leading to increased poverty and a decrease in overall well-being.
Secondly, employment offers individuals opportunities for personal and professional growth. Even if someone does not enjoy their current job, it does not mean they cannot develop transferable skills or gain experience that can be valuable in the future. For instance, someone may learn important organizational or teamwork skills that can be applied in other domains. Furthermore, being employed often provides individuals with access to training and development programs that can enhance their career prospects. This is particularly relevant in rapidly evolving industries, where skills can quickly become outdated.
Moreover, being employed provides individuals with a sense of purpose and social connections. Work can give individuals a sense of accomplishment and contribute to their overall well-being. It also offers opportunities for social interaction and the formation of meaningful relationships with colleagues. In contrast, unemployment can lead to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and mental health issues. Research conducted by the World Health Organization has shown that unemployment is associated with increased rates of depression and anxiety.
Lastly, being employed contributes to the overall economic well-being of society. When individuals are employed, they contribute to the production of goods and services, pay taxes, and stimulate economic growth. This, in turn, benefits society as a whole by creating opportunities for others and increasing the overall standard of living. On the other hand, high levels of unemployment can lead to reduced economic activity, increased government spending on welfare programs, and a strain on public resources.
In conclusion, I disagree with the notion that it is better for people to be unemployed than to be employed but not enjoy their work. Being employed provides individuals with financial stability, opportunities for personal and professional growth, a sense of purpose, and social connections. Moreover, employment contributes to the overall well-being of society. While job satisfaction is important, it is not the sole determinant of the value and benefits of employment.
( 457 words ) - 29 minutes
@teacherjalol
Does it mean that I can finish the whole reading passage in just 2 minutes roughly?
Читать полностью…
❗️An average ielts reading passage has between 800 - 1200 words. It's really important not to waste your time by reading everything word by word
Читать полностью…
What's your reading speed per minute❔
(With full understanding of the context)
📌Soon I'll start sharing IELTS based authentic scientific articles so that you don't have to buy them anymore 😁
P.S Don't forget to invite your friends ladies and gentlemen
📹Post Malone - Hollywood's Bleeding (Lyrics)
@teacherjalol
📌Topic from 08.02.2024 (BC/IDP)
✅Some people say that all people should stay in full-time education until they are at least 18 years old.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been a growing debate regarding whether all individuals should be required to remain in full-time education until the age of 18. While it is important to consider the diverse needs and aspirations of young people, I am inclined to agree with the notion that extending compulsory education until the age of 18 can yield significant benefits for both individuals and society as a whole. This essay will outline the reasons supporting this viewpoint.
Firstly, extending the duration of compulsory education can enhance the overall educational attainment of individuals. By remaining in full-time education until the age of 18, students have more time to develop a broader range of knowledge and skills. This extended period allows for a more comprehensive understanding of various subjects and fosters critical thinking abilities. Moreover, it provides students with the opportunity to explore their interests and potential career paths before making important decisions regarding higher education or vocational training.
Secondly, staying in full-time education until the age of 18 can positively impact future employment prospects. In today's rapidly evolving job market, employers often seek individuals who possess a higher level of education and advanced skill sets. By requiring individuals to stay in education for a longer period, they are more likely to acquire the necessary qualifications and competencies to secure better job opportunities. This, in turn, can contribute to reducing unemployment rates and enhancing economic productivity.
Furthermore, extending compulsory education can have a positive effect on societal development. Education plays a crucial role in fostering social cohesion and promoting values such as tolerance, respect, and empathy. By ensuring that all young people remain in education until the age of 18, society can strive towards creating a more inclusive and harmonious environment. Additionally, education equips individuals with the knowledge and skills needed to actively participate in civic life, making them responsible and informed citizens.
Critics may argue that not all individuals are suited for traditional academic pathways and that forcing them to stay in education may be counterproductive. However, it is essential to recognize that extending compulsory education does not necessarily imply a one-size-fits-all approach. Schools and educational systems can provide a variety of learning pathways, including vocational training and apprenticeships, to cater to the diverse needs and aspirations of students. This flexibility ensures that individuals have the opportunity to pursue alternative routes that align with their interests and talents.
In conclusion, extending compulsory education until the age of 18 can yield numerous advantages for individuals and society. It allows for a more comprehensive education, enhances future employment prospects, fosters social development, and ensures the provision of various learning pathways. By recognizing the importance of education as a lifelong journey, we can empower young people to reach their full potential and contribute meaningfully to the world around them.
(466 words) - 42 minutes
#writing_task_2
@teacherjalol
📌CD - IELTS
✅Another participant of my Listening and Reading Marathon
📌 Overall - 7.5
⚡️ Listening - 8.5
⚡️ Reading - 8.0
🔥 Writing - 6.5
🔥 Speaking - 6.0
#result
@teacherjalol
Brian Edward Cox
One of Joe Rogan’s favorite guests (with best talks on infinite universes.)
@teacherjalol
✅Writing Topic from 03.02.2024 (BC/IDP) - Real Exam
Some people say that the governments should pay for health care and education but others think that this is not the government's responsibility.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In recent years, the issue of whether governments should bear the financial burden of providing healthcare and education has sparked intense debate. While some argue that the government should assume these responsibilities, there are others who believe that such matters should be left to the individuals and the private sector. This essay will delve into both viewpoints and offer my own opinion on the matter.
Those who advocate for government-funded healthcare and education argue that these are fundamental rights that should be accessible to all citizens, regardless of their socioeconomic background. They contend that a well-funded healthcare system ensures that everyone receives necessary medical treatment, reducing the burden of healthcare costs on individuals and promoting equality. Similarly, proponents of government-funded education assert that quality education should be provided to all children, regardless of their financial circumstances, as education is crucial for personal and societal development.
Furthermore, proponents argue that government intervention is necessary to address market failures in healthcare and education. They claim that leaving these sectors to the private market can lead to inequalities, as those with greater financial resources will have access to better services, while the less privileged may struggle to afford essential care or quality education. By implementing government-funded programs, they argue, societies can ensure an equitable distribution of resources and an equal opportunity for all.
On the other hand, opponents of government-funded healthcare and education assert that such policies can be burdensome for taxpayers and may lead to inefficiencies and bureaucracy. They argue that individuals should have the freedom to choose their own healthcare and education options, as this promotes competition and innovation. Moreover, critics contend that government intervention in these sectors can stifle individual responsibility and discourage self-reliance.
Additionally, opponents argue that relying on the private sector can lead to more efficient and responsive healthcare and education systems. They assert that competition among providers can drive down costs and improve quality, as individuals will have the freedom to choose the services that best meet their needs. Furthermore, they argue that private initiatives can bring innovation and adaptability to these sectors, leading to better outcomes for individuals.
In my opinion, while there are valid points on both sides of the argument, I believe that the government should take responsibility for providing healthcare and education. Access to affordable healthcare and quality education is crucial for the well-being and development of individuals and society as a whole. By ensuring that these services are available to all, regardless of their financial circumstances, governments can promote equality and social cohesion. While there may be challenges in terms of cost and efficiency, these can be addressed through effective governance and strategic allocation of resources.
To conclude, the issue of government-funded healthcare and education elicits differing opinions. While some argue for individual responsibility and private sector involvement, others emphasize the role of the government in ensuring equitable access to these fundamental services. In my view, the government should bear the responsibility of providing healthcare and education, as it is essential for a fair and prosperous society.
(505 words ) - 43 minutes
⚡️ Task Response - 9.0
⚡️ Coherence & Cohesion - 9.0
⚡️ Lexical Resource - 9.0
⚡️ Grammatical Range & Accuracy - 9.0
✅Overall - 9.0 (Task 2)
The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The issue of environmental problems is a pressing global concern that requires effective solutions. While some argue that increasing the price of fuel is the best approach to tackle these issues, I fundamentally disagree with this perspective. This essay will outline why relying solely on fuel price increases as a solution is inadequate and explore alternative measures that should be considered to address the world's environmental challenges.
Increasing the price of fuel may have unintended economic consequences. Higher fuel prices disproportionately affect low-income individuals and vulnerable communities who heavily rely on affordable transportation for their daily needs. Moreover, industries that are dependent on fuel, such as transportation and manufacturing, could experience significant cost increases, leading to inflation and economic instability. Therefore, relying solely on fuel price increases may exacerbate income inequality and hinder economic growth.
While higher fuel prices may discourage some individuals from using vehicles, it is important to recognize that not all sectors contribute equally to environmental problems. The transportation sector is just one facet of the issue, and other significant contributors, such as industrial emissions and deforestation, would remain largely unaffected by fuel price increases. To comprehensively address environmental problems, a multifaceted approach is required that targets various sectors and encourages sustainable practices beyond fuel consumption.
Instead of solely relying on fuel price increases, it is essential to foster technological innovation and research in renewable energy sources. Governments and private sectors should invest in research and development of alternative energy technologies, such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. By incentivizing and supporting the adoption of these sustainable alternatives, we can reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate environmental damage more effectively.
Implementing comprehensive policies and raising public awareness regarding sustainable practices are equally important for addressing environmental problems. Governments should enact stricter regulations on emissions, incentivize green initiatives, and promote environmentally friendly practices through public campaigns and educational programs. Such measures would encourage a broader shift towards sustainable living and provide long-term solutions to environmental challenges.
While some argue that increasing the price of fuel is the best solution to tackle the world's environmental problems, I strongly disagree with this perspective. Solely relying on fuel price increases may have adverse economic implications, only address a limited part of the problem, and fail to promote necessary technological innovations and policy measures. To effectively combat environmental problems, a holistic approach that encompasses various sectors, technological advancements, and comprehensive policies is essential. By considering these alternative measures, we can work towards a sustainable future for our planet.
(418 words) - 34 minutes
#writing_task_2
@teacherjalol
Some people think that young criminals should receive the same punishment as adults.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The issue of whether young criminals should be subjected to the same punishments as adults is a highly debated topic. While some argue that equal punishment is warranted to maintain justice and deterrence, I firmly disagree. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons why young criminals should not receive the same punishment as adults, highlighting the importance of considering their age, cognitive development, and potential for rehabilitation.
Young individuals are still in the process of developing their cognitive abilities, emotional maturity, and decision-making skills. It is widely acknowledged that the adolescent brain is not fully developed, particularly in areas related to impulse control and risk assessment. Therefore, holding them to the same degree of responsibility as adults for their actions is neither fair nor just. By recognizing the age factor, the justice system can acknowledge the potential for growth and change in young offenders.
Another crucial consideration is the potential for rehabilitation and reintegration into society. The primary aim of the justice system should not be punitive, but rather to reform and rehabilitate offenders. Young criminals, due to their age and malleability, have a higher likelihood of responding positively to rehabilitative efforts. By tailoring interventions to their specific needs, such as education, counseling, and vocational training, we can pave the way for their successful reintegration into society, reducing the chances of future criminal behavior.
Treating young criminals the same as adults can have severe long-term consequences for their personal development and prospects. Subjecting them to adult punishments, such as lengthy prison sentences or life without parole, can perpetuate a cycle of criminality. It can hinder their chances of pursuing education, employment, and personal growth, making it increasingly difficult for them to reintegrate into society as law-abiding citizens. By providing young offenders with age-appropriate interventions, society can prioritize their development and ensure a better future for both the individual and the community.
Some may argue that equal punishment for young criminals is necessary to maintain deterrence and uphold the principles of justice. They may assert that leniency towards young offenders may send the wrong message and encourage a disregard for the law. However, it is crucial to recognize that deterrence can be achieved through alternative means, such as restorative justice, community service, and educational programs specifically designed to address the root causes of criminal behavior.
In conclusion, treating young criminals the same as adults in terms of punishment fails to consider the significant differences in their cognitive development, potential for rehabilitation, and long-term consequences. By prioritizing age-appropriate interventions and focusing on rehabilitation rather than retribution, society can provide young offenders with the opportunity to learn from their mistakes, reintegrate into society, and lead productive lives. It is essential to have a justice system that recognizes the unique needs and potential for growth in young individuals, ensuring a more just and compassionate society.
( 472 words ) - 31 minutes
@teacherjalol
Personally, I disagree with the notion that supermarkets should only sell food produced within their own country. While there may be arguments in favor of this idea, I believe that allowing supermarkets to sell imported food brings various advantages for consumers, economies, and global cooperation.
Firstly, permitting the sale of imported food in supermarkets provides consumers with a wider range of choices and enhances their overall shopping experience. Different countries possess unique agricultural practices and climates, enabling them to produce certain foods more efficiently and at a lower cost. Allowing these products to be imported and sold in supermarkets ensures that consumers have access to a diverse selection of high-quality food items throughout the year. It also introduces them to new flavors, cuisines, and cultural experiences, enriching their culinary preferences.
Secondly, the sale of imported food contributes significantly to economic growth and development. Many countries rely on agricultural exports as a vital source of income and employment. By allowing supermarkets to sell imported food, it creates opportunities for international trade, benefiting both domestic and foreign producers. This stimulates economic activity, increases revenue, and fosters job creation, which ultimately leads to improved living standards for individuals within the country.
Moreover, implementing a policy that restricts supermarkets to selling only domestically produced food into practice may result in higher prices for consumers. Limited supply and reduced competition can drive up prices, as domestic producers may face less pressure to keep their prices competitive. Importing food fosters competition, which helps keep prices affordable for consumers. It also encourages domestic producers to innovate, improve their efficiency, and maintain competitive prices to retain their market share.
Additionally, allowing supermarkets to sell imported food promotes global cooperation and diplomatic relations. International trade of food products facilitates cultural exchange and mutual understanding between nations. It creates opportunities for collaboration and strengthens ties between different countries. By embracing the importation of food, countries can develop partnerships and engage in dialogue on various issues, fostering peaceful relationships and enhancing global interconnectedness.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that supermarkets should not be limited to selling only food produced within their own country. The availability of imported food offers consumers a wider variety of choices, stimulates economic growth through international trade, helps maintain affordable prices, and promotes global cooperation. Embracing the importation of food in supermarkets benefits consumers, economies, and international relations.
(391 words) ~ 25 minutes