1838
A place for Folkish Pagans who oppose the subversive modernity.
Christ had two faces. As a communist, as a teacher of humble wisdom, of living happily for God, with direct faith in the existence of the highest form of goodness, which leads everyone to good deeds, he was a model of meekness and forgiveness. As one who unmasked the existing governmental order, as one who made a spirit of revenge boil up in the masses, he terrified the world and made it more somber. He was a great scold, ready to set the whip in motion, although the threat of it was a sufficiently cruel fantasy.
𝐒𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐭 𝐏𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞'𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐄𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
Lunacharsky, A: Religiia Isotzializm, vol. 2 pp. 139-140.
@USSRLovedChrist
On Friday, the 25th of July, join us as we go over how to advocate for ancestral faith and ways in the debate scene.
In today's age, debate is often how our ideas get exposure and will be met with fierce opposition. We will address various points made against ancestral faith and how to respond.
These will cover attacks and defenses from:
• abrahamists
• atheists
• axialists
• new-agers
• and others
Afterwards we will have an open Q&A where you can pose your toughest questions and see how its done live!
On this channel we have hosted debates live, as well as having years of experience debating on behalf of ancestral faiths. As we grow, our ideas will have scrutiny, will you know how to respond? Make sure to tune in 7/25/25 to gain the arguments and skills to advance the inevitability of Pagan Revivalism!
We take it for granted that politics is a branch of morality, that the organisation and ends of the folk are governed by what's right.
But what if this is backwards? What if the ends of the folk govern what's right? What if what's right just is what's right for my folk? This is much closer to the folkish worldview.
The folkish worldview doesn't have a conception of "Right with a capital R", as in "right everywhere, at all times, for all people". Right differs depending on who you are. Right depends on who's asking, and who's telling. Right grows out of the folk.
It's impossible for your folk to be wrong. To even ask whether your folk might be wrong doesn't make sense. How could you even begin to answer the question?
Morality is a branch of politics.
@folkishworldview
Join us live for a 2nd Anniversary stream as we go over the past year and what's to come for Pagan Revivalism!
/channel/Pagan_Revivalism?livestream
Personally I enjoy the original, colorful versions of Greek statues more than pure white as classy as the latter is
Читать полностью…
Pagan fundamentalism (Paganism proper) means that your religion is the fundament (basis) of your worldview. It means being rooted in your ancestral faith. Example: Paganism is opposed to the theory of evolution because the myth state that humans were created.
Newcomers are slow to develop such traditionally fundamentalist, folkish view because most used to be atheists or atheistic christians.
The main issue for religion today is the concept of objective, universal (non-tribal) truth which philosophy-science promotes. That’s why philosophers were charged with impiety. Their fundament is not the lore of their people, but a bunch of supposedly higher truth. Later science popularized this approach which is why anti-folkish (rootless) pagans today use scientific data contradicting the lore as some counter to faith-rooted mythical literalism. All stems from the idealism-universalism.
At least Rings of Power was separated from the trilogy. Now they are going to retroactively blackwash it.
Читать полностью…
All our problems can be traced back to idealism. It’s a separation from reality which led to the advent of anti-religions such as christianity and buddhism. Led to the modern leftist concepts like gender (non-physical sex) too. All because some ancient degens like Plato and jews wondering their endless deserts didn’t like the real world with its limitations. Also they were all closet atheists who went against the traditional literal, physical Gods of the Folk religions (aka Paganisms) and created platonism and abrahamism respectively.
Now after centuries of subversion their attitude is so mainstream that even some self-proclaimed Pagans are duped by the world of pure ideas.
Something interesting has been happening. Have you noticed?
When pagans (or others) argue a theory of history, or some metaphysical concept, or folkhood etc, Christians now say "well, we have this concept too", or "we can defend race and folkhood too". Do you see what's going on?
They're on the back foot. They feel left out. For the first time in thousands of years, Christians are having to argue their position, but not from the right against the left: they're arguing from the left against the right.
But they don't know how to do that. Christianity can't claim to be our tradition because we're not Christian anymore, Christianity has been replaced by modernity. And Christians can't argue that they're the defenders of authority and tradition because paganism has begun to argue that point, and convincingly.
Christianity has been the null hypothesis for centuries, but that's over. Now it's being outflanked from the right, but it's also not the leftmost point on the compass. Where can it stand?
This will only get worse.
@folkishworldview
I always get frustrated when stumbling upon yet another idiot who thinks that monuments like temples, statues, pyramids etc were built by aliens, giants or some forgotten civilizations with sci-fi tech. Taking the ancients for retards is very christian. Also most modern people can’t imagine what dedication (often religious) and wit produce.
Читать полностью…
Why Gods are not supernatural
Do you call birds supernatural? Probably not. But they can fly which is not natural for humans. The same logic can be applied to Gods and Goddesses. They can do things humans can’t, but it’s their divine nature to do so.
When you hear one call Gods supernatural it shows that he/she sees the world with an atheistic/christian lens.
Why You Aren't Finding "Ethnic Pagans"
Recently I was, against my better judgement, in an argument, well actually 2 simultaneous arguments with opposite ends of the Spectrum of what we call the Pagan Sphere, the results were surreal.
One side could best be described as akin to Norse Wiccans feeling their way through it and mostly repeating the jargon of Runes, Skål, Allfather, Valhalla! While the other was cloaked in academic veracity but spoke with their own dogmatic jargon of Indo-European, Sky-Father, Etymology and Experts Agree! Both sides began the argument for the same reason and had much the same response Odin is the all powerful Main God of Aryan/Norse! Whether they called him All father or Sky Father and sometimes both.
What was most shocking to me was that all other gods were relegated to unimportant nonentities. One side describing all other gods as "Some Random" while the other claimed that "the Gods pray to Odin just as we do".
Neither side knew nor cared about any folk traditions even speaking of them derogatorily as "Fairy Tales". How can you know who or what a God or people are if their story means nothing to you?
-
Odin is just the most egregious example of this, the main difference between each sides rendering of a new one true god seems to be whether they have his portrait painted like Conan the Barbarian or Strawberry Shortcake.
Other Gods and tribes have suffered the same indignity all minutia or personality stripped from them The Morrigan for the Gaels or Zeus for the Greeks. Made into an all powerful being without distinct traits, no different from the Christian customs of a Build-a-Bear-Religion. Do you prefer God with one eye or two? Pussy or Penis?
How can you be Ethnic Pagan if you don't care about any Ethnic Traditions beyond how it can be conflated into some grand universalist narrative? The peoples own history, culture and relationship to the Gods all but disposed of, meaningless fluff to the core of the One True.
How is this ethnic?
@Hyperborean Radio (Uncensored)
^ not really correct since temples were definitely a major part of every Pagan society, but it’s a nice image.
Читать полностью…
Buddhism is worse than christinaity. At least most christians just ignore their own dogma and taboos.
Читать полностью…
Xenophanes taught that there’s a universal power all people stupidly interpret as distinct ethic Gods. He is respected by modern muslims.
Guenon taught that there’s a universal tradition for all people on Earth. He became a muslim.
Anti-Folkish subversion is not a modern thing. Early on such ideas were met with proper action (Xenophanes was exiled and Socrates was executed), but as time went on those occult (secret, marginal) teachings managed to spread, mostly during the Axial Age, though there were some anti-Folkish traitors long before it (e.g. Akhenaten)
Typical Dunning-Kruger syndrome vargtard who believes in metaphors instead of Gods and myth
Читать полностью…
A kinsman and I trekked deep in the forests of the PNW today. Saw some absolutely amazing sights.
#GetBackToNature
This world’s magic is being replaced by technology. Their population is going extinct due to light pollution, pesticide use & habitat destruction.
Читать полностью…
I place Jesus Christ's Sermon on the Mount and his Ten Commandments close to the moral code that builds communism. Side by side. The goal of Soviet power was to try to create the righteous kingdom of heaven on Earth.
𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐀𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐲𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐙𝐲𝐮𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐯
President of the Russian Communist Party (CPRF) in a radio interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda tabloid, dated 2 Sept. 2021.
@USSRLovedChrist
Odin in the hall of the Völsungs by Iwobrand
Читать полностью…