16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
While the NEJM study reported mild side effects, real-world data tells a darker story:
• Myocarditis & pericarditis – Australia documented 19.4 cases per 100,000 doses, with chest pain occurring at 91.3 per 100,000 doses.
• Anaphylaxis – Seven cases (all in women) emerged post-approval, despite zero cases in clinical trials.
• Menstrual disturbances – Women reported sudden, severe changes in their cycles—a phenomenon ignored in trials.
• Deaths – Four fatalities were dismissed without investigation, despite occurring shortly after vaccination.
Instead of convening an independent advisory committee to scrutinize these risks, the FDA fast-tracked approval, claiming the data "did not raise concerns." Yet, buried in the fine print, the agency mandated post-approval studies on myocarditis, strokes, and pregnancy outcomes—due between 2027 and 2032.
This means millions of people are being used as guinea pigs while regulators wait a decade to confirm if the vaccine is safe. Novavax’s vaccine is not the "natural" alternative it’s marketed as. It’s a genetically engineered, insect-cell-derived product with serious post-market risks and no long-term safety data. The FDA’s approval is a betrayal of public trust, prioritizing corporate profits over informed consent.
The question isn’t whether Novavax works — it’s whether anyone truly knows the long-term cost.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
HHS to stop recommending routine COVID-19 injections for kids and pregnant women
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is preparing to halt its blanket recommendation that pregnant women, children and teenagers routinely receive Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, according to a Wall Street Journal report Thursday, May 15.
The move marks a significant reversal of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) policy, which has urged vaccination for all individuals six months and older since 2021. It follows years of mounting evidence linking the shots to severe injuries, including myocarditis, fertility issues and fetal harm. Nevertheless, the reports of vaccine damage raise urgent questions about why federal agencies delayed action despite early warnings.
If confirmed, the decision would align with long-standing criticisms from medical experts and advocacy groups, who argue that the risks of mRNA vaccines outweigh the benefits for young, healthy populations. CDC data shows only 13 percent of children and 14 percent of pregnant women have received the latest booster, reflecting widespread public skepticism.
Health freedom advocates dubbed the policy change overdue. "CHD has opposed the COVID-19 shot recommendation for children since the beginning," said Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland.
Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough @P_McCulloughMD, a vocal critic of the vaccines, noted that it took "two presidents, three HHS secretaries and three FDA [Food and Drug Administration] commissioners" for the vaccine guidance to be reversed. He added: "After record vaccine injuries, disabilities and death, America is wondering: Will any of these leaders be held accountable?"
HHS's 180-degree turn comes as public trust in COVID-19 shots erodes
The agency's anticipated pivot comes as 11 states push legislative bans on COVID-19 vaccines. Meanwhile, criminal investigations in seven states target officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci for alleged misconduct during the pandemic.
Internal Pfizer documents analyzed by the Daily Clout, revealed the shots' links to miscarriages and heart damage in minors as early as 2021. Yet the CDC continued promoting them for pregnancy, and its advisory committees unanimously added COVID-19 vaccines to the childhood immunization schedule in 2023 – despite their emergency-use-only status for children under 12.
Pediatrician Dr. Michelle Perro warned that mRNA vaccines contain "undetermined DNA fragments" with potential genetic risks. Journalist and Daily Clout founder Naomi Wolf meanwhile emphasized that the shots "never stopped COVID in the first place."
The reported policy shift reflects a broader reckoning over pandemic-era mandates. With an estimated 600,000 U.S. deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines – surpassing combined American casualties in major 20th-century wars – public trust in health agencies has eroded.
Meanwhile, medical groups like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) still endorse vaccination for pregnant women. While the ACOG continues to cite elevated risks of severe infection to justify its position, that stance may now face scrutiny.
While the CDC's expected reversal is a step toward accountability, advocates demand further action. They call for pulling the vaccines from the market, revoking liability shields for manufacturers and prosecuting officials who enabled what McCullough calls "the disastrous COVID-19 vaccine debacle."
Watch Dr. Jim Thorp exposing how the CDC concealed the huge infant mortality rate for the COVID-19 injections in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/ac4a957d-e5b0-42fa-af9f-3bb0d82a5976
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Another “Conspiracy Theory” PROVEN TRUE about mRNA CLOT SHOTS reveals tricked human cells keep producing DEADLY SPIKE PRIONS indefinitely
We called it at the beginning, when Big Pharma and the CDC were lying through their teeth, claiming that the mRNA “technology” would only have your cells create spike proteins for a short amount of time, just long enough for your immune system to create antibodies, and then end the production of the virus-mimicking prions. Big fat lie.
First off, the prions don’t just remain at the site of injection. That was a lie. The spike protein prions spread throughout the vascular system, invade the cleansing organs, the brain and the ovaries, and use light to join together to form white, rubbery clots that drive all-cause mortality rates to skyrocket.
Clot shots altered the injected humanoids to be walking prion factories who are dying of all-cause mortality that all boils back to the mRNA Trojan Horse “technology”
Millions of nanoparticles are created by tricked cells for indefinite periods of time, possibly forever, and the injected humanoids around the globe are suffering mass health detriment. That’s right, Moderna and Pfizer clot shots hijack the immune cells, rewrite your DNA and RNA, and prolong spike protein prion production POSSIBLY FOREVER, in the shortened life of the billions of gene-altered humans who succumbed to the plandemic scam. What a shame.
A groundbreaking study published in Nature has upended long-standing assurances from health authorities that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines quickly degrade in the body. Instead, the research reveals that Pfizer and Moderna shots reprogram immune cells to extend their genetic instructions, forcing prolonged spike protein production — contrary to official claims that effects would last only "a few weeks." The findings, led by Polish researchers (Krawczyk et al., 2025), expose a hidden mechanism that could have serious long-term health implications, raising urgent questions about safety, transparency, and regulatory oversight.
The study found that immune cells, particularly macrophages, activate an enzyme called TENT5A in response to mRNA vaccines. This enzyme rewrites the vaccine’s genetic code, doubling the length of its poly(A) tail — a molecular timer that determines how long mRNA survives. In some cases, Moderna’s mRNA tail extended from 100 to 200 nucleotides, drastically prolonging spike protein production.
"This wasn’t just persistence—it was amplification," said Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist and vaccine safety advocate. "The body is essentially tricked into editing the shot’s instructions to make it last longer. This was never part of the clinical trials."
Public health officials, including CDC advisor Dr. Paul Offit, previously asserted that spike protein production would last only "a couple of weeks." Yet studies have since detected spike protein in blood samples for up to 709 days post-injection. Moderna’s own 2024 internal documents acknowledged "unacceptable toxicity" risks, yet regulators fast-tracked the shots without addressing these concerns.
Molecular biologist Dr. Jessica Rose likened the process to "giving someone a self-replicating memo. The memo was supposed to be read once and discarded. Instead, the recipient photocopies it endlessly."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
While past presidents, including Trump, have used autopens for routine documents, Biden’s team allegedly deployed it for legally consequential actions, including pardons for political allies like Adam Schiff and Liz Cheney. A Heritage Foundation analysis confirmed the blanket clemency grants were autopen-signed, raising legal and ethical red flags.
The autopen scandal is more than a bureaucratic controversy; it’s a glaring indictment of an administration that prioritized secrecy over accountability. As Comer’s investigation advances, Americans deserve answers about who wielded presidential authority while Biden’s mental acuity faltered. The truth, long suppressed by a complicit media and political establishment, is finally coming to light. And for those who participated in this deception, subpoenas—and perhaps legal consequences—await.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
WEAPONIZED EBOLA AND MARBURG VIRUSES may have leaked from Maryland’s Fort Detrick DHS lab when two scientist lovers had violent argument
The US government is hard at work creating the next pandemic in aerosol form from the deadliest viruses on planet Earth. Two idiot scientists had a romantic spat at the Ft. Detrick lab and one of them poked a hole in other one’s hazmat suit, likely exposes the victim and helping to “accidentally” release the next bioweapon of terror as an aerosolized, genetically mutated version of Ebola (EBOV) or Marburg (MARV) virus.
Yes, the Department of Homeland Insecurity is working hard to royally screw up the planet by creating recombination genomes of strains of deadly Ebola and Marburg viruses and testing them in rats and monkeys in a biolab near Frederick, Maryland. What could possibly go wrong?
Biolab workers really “screwed up” this time while having a relationship fight in the most dangerous bioweapons lab on the planet, right here on US soil
Filoviruses like Ebola and Marburg are classified as Category A bioterrorism agents by the CDC due to their high lethality and potential for mass casualties. Research into aerosol transmission—meant to develop countermeasures—has also raised concerns about dual-use risks. A 2012 study at Fort Detrick successfully modified mice to be susceptible to airborne Ebola, a step critics argue could enable weaponization.
“I am told in public records that they are doing experiments or have done experiments to aerosolize Ebola at the Impact lab, that’s the DHS lab nearby Fort Detrick,” Sen. Paul said during a Senate hearing. “The idea of aerosolizing Ebola… is incredibly dangerous and probably goes against the Biological Weapons Convention.”
Recent revelations about U.S. biolabs experimenting with aerosolized Ebola have raised alarms among scientists and policymakers. The debate centers on whether such research, conducted at facilities like Fort Detrick and the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Impact Lab, poses an unacceptable risk of accidental—or intentional—release.
The discussion gained traction after Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) questioned officials about unreported safety breaches, including an alleged incident where a jilted lab worker sabotaged a colleague’s hazmat suit during a study on weaponized Ebola.
The Senate hearing also exposed troubling lapses in biolab oversight. An anonymous HHS source revealed an incident where a researcher allegedly punctured a colleague’s protective gear during a personal dispute while working with Ebola. Dr. Connie Schmaljohn, the lab director, reportedly failed to report the breach, raising questions about accountability. Talk about domestic terrorism. Our own government is engaging in it and pretending like it’s just another day at the lab.
Data from the past decade shows hundreds of accidental pathogen releases in U.S. labs, including anthrax, tuberculosis, and Ebola. Between 2014 and 2022, over 600 such incidents were recorded, with at least two workers infected—though no deaths were reported.
While research on deadly pathogens is critical for medical preparedness, the lack of transparency and recurring safety failures fuel fears of catastrophic accidents—or worse, intentional misuse. As global tensions rise, the ethical and security implications of aerosolizing Ebola demand urgent scrutiny. Whether for defense or disaster, the line between protection and peril remains perilously thin.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Canada’s top health officials forced to sign oath concealing Trudeau’s COVID-19 failures
Newly-uncovered records show that Canada's Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam, along with dozens of senior government officials, signed a secret oath preventing them from disclosing information related to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) that could be detrimental to former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
According to the pledge obtained through Access to Information requests, at least 29 high ranking officials across multiple federal departments – including Tam herself – were bound by this confidentiality agreement. The oath raises serious concerns about transparency during one of the most critical public health crises in modern history.
The signed agreement explicitly warned against unauthorized disclosures that could lead to "embarrassment, criticism, or claims against Canada." It also threatened damage to supplier relations – a clear reference to the government's dealings with vaccine manufacturers. The oath's timing came as Ottawa inked multi-billion-dollar vaccine contracts with pharmaceutical giants.
Moreover, the oath forced officials to adhere to the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector – a document meant to ensure integrity. But in this case, it appears to have been weaponized to suppress dissent.
Ultimately, the pledge signed by Tam and other officials suggests a deliberate effort to shield decision-making from public scrutiny. Critics argued this was less about protecting national security and more about avoiding accountability.
Canadian taxpayers foot the bill for vaccine injuries
The Trudeau government committed over $8 billion to COVID-19 vaccine contracts with companies like Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca. Notably, these deals included liability protections for manufacturers, meaning Canadian taxpayers – not the pharmaceutical firms – would cover the cost of any vaccine injuries.
This arrangement led to the creation of Canada's Vaccine Injury Support Program, which is now facing budget overruns due to mounting injury claims. Meanwhile, the government continues purchasing vaccines despite plummeting public demand – a decision that defies both fiscal and medical logic.
Statistics Canada reports show a rise in deaths from both COVID-19 and unspecified causes following the vaccine rollout. While correlation does not equal causation, the data has fueled skepticism about the safety of the shots, particularly among younger demographics.
Independent investigations have linked mRNA vaccines to severe side effects, including heart inflammation and blood clots. Additionally, ethical concerns persist over the use of abortion-derived cell lines in vaccine development.
The revelation of this secret oath underscores a disturbing pattern of opacity in Canada's pandemic response. Instead of fostering open dialogue, the Trudeau government chose to muzzle its own experts – prioritizing political image over public trust.
As Canadians grapple with the long-term consequences of rushed policies, one thing is clear: True accountability will only come when all suppressed information sees the light of day. Until then, the question remains: What else are they hiding?
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree discussing Justin Trudeau's resignation as Canadian prime minister in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/10b8f3bd-5012-4f2d-a660-f400f7f780bc
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Mercury in flu shots: A silent threat to unborn babies
The CDC insists flu shots are essential for pregnant women—but fails to disclose that multi-dose vials contain thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative. Mercury is a known neurotoxin that crosses the placental barrier, yet the CDC’s flu vaccine webpage omits this critical risk. The failure of annual flu shots equates to false assurances for pregnant women, leading many to succumb to doctor pressure to inoculate with poisonous mercury based vaccines that can damage the entire developmental process of their baby.
Eileen Dannemann, director of the National Coalition of Organized Women, revealed that between 2009 and 2010, mercury-laden flu vaccines spiked fetal death reports by 4,250% in VAERS. Despite this, the CDC still pushes the shots as "safe."
Post-marketing data links flu vaccines to 10 nervous system disorders, including Guillain-Barré syndrome and encephalopathy. A 2017 study even found a higher miscarriage rate among vaccinated women. Yet, the CDC buries these findings, instead citing cherry-picked studies that downplay risks.
RSV and Tdap: Profit over protection
Pfizer’s RSV vaccine, Abrysvo, costs over $300 per dose and may increase preterm births. Dr. Vinay Prasad, the FDA’s new vaccine regulator, admitted: "I have no confidence this vaccine is a net positive."
Meanwhile, the Tdap vaccine contains aluminum, a neurotoxin linked to various forms of brain damage that precede autism diagnoses. Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., warns: "Aluminum exposure of a pregnant mother is inexcusable." Yet, the CDC mandates it in the third trimester, ignoring the potential for lifelong harm.
The CDC’s vaccine recommendations for pregnant women are not based on sound science—they’re driven by corporate interests and bureaucratic inertia. With mounting evidence of fetal harm, it’s time to demand accountability, and a complete removal of vaccine licenses for pregnant women and their babies. Pregnant women deserve real informed consent, not coercion into risky medical interventions that damage their child's brain.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The case underscores broader concerns about censorship in academia. A 2022 study found scientists challenging COVID-19 orthodoxy faced article retractions and professional retaliation. In 2024, NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya condemned a "culture of cover-up" under Fauci and Collins, pledging to foster dissent.
Science, politics and the search for accountability
Five years after COVID-19’s emergence, the "Proximal Origin" saga remains a flashpoint in the debate over scientific integrity. The Trump administration’s investigation signals a reckoning for journals accused of prioritizing narrative over neutrality — but whether it leads to reform or further polarization hinges on transparency. As former NIH official David Relman noted, "When conclusions are driven by bias, not data, the public pays the price." For millions still seeking answers, the cost has been immeasurable.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
WHO’s PANDEMIC AGREEMENT just a ploy to CONTROL every aspect of any SCAMDEMIC they declare at any time and indefinitely
They had it for a little while. Complete control. The New World Order, run by the globalists and their right arm, Big Pharma, had complete control of nearly every human on planet earth during the beginning of the Covid plandemic. It worked. The mass-propaganda campaign of fear caused mass panic and everyone lost their minds, bowing down to the nonsensical “protocol” of lockdowns, masks, social distancing, antibacterial lathering for a virus, and mass-death-jab indoctrination.
All the big-wig organizations were in on it: WHO, CDC, FDA, WEF, all of them. The end game was to get every human being injected with “technology” where their cells create billions of prions that drive all-cause mortality, so nobody can boil it back to the death jabs, but the world would only consist of a couple billion people within a few years. Hindsight is 20/20, so anyone can see from the carnage of the clot shots that this is no conspiracy theory.
The WHO was the fulcrum for the New World Order and the Great Reset using the Plandemic as the catapult for depopulation and complete control of populace
The WHO was the fulcrum for the New World Order, the Great Reset, and they wanted complete control of everyone’s lives, including taking away all medical freedoms and right to free speech and press.
In fact, the Brownstone Institute recently published a commentary analyzing the draft Pandemic Agreement set to be considered at the upcoming 78th World Health Assembly. The agreement, which complements the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR) amended in 2024, aims to centralize pandemic management under the World Health Organization (WHO). While much of the document uses non-binding language like "may" and "where appropriate," it reflects WHO’s push for control over all aspects of pandemics, from declaration to response, including vaccine distribution and supply chains.
Critics argue that the agreement lacks proportionality and narrowly focuses on certain populations while ignoring broader health needs. For instance, it overlooks the importance of individual resilience and the unique health priorities of regions like Africa, which has a predominantly young population.
Instead of decentralizing health care, the WHO is promoting a "whole-of-government" approach, which some say has caused harm, particularly in lower-income countries during the COVID-19 response. The agreement also emphasizes WHO-approved vaccines and allopathic medicines while downplaying traditional healing practices.
The draft agreement links health with climate change, framing it as a major threat to global health. This reflects a growing trend within the WHO to expand its mandate beyond traditional health issues. However, the agreement’s focus on large-scale, centralized solutions raises concerns about practicality and cost, especially for developing countries. For example, Article 9 of the agreement calls for low-cost vaccines and technology transfers to less-developed nations but implementing this could be challenging and expensive.
Additionally, the agreement includes provisions for a Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), aimed at sharing pathogen materials and ensuring equitable benefits. However, the details of this system remain unclear, and critics warn it could create conflicts of interest and Intellectual Property (IP) disputes. The WHO’s role in training and capacity-building for pandemic product production is also seen as overreaching, given its limitations.
Overall, the Brownstone Institute and others argue that the Pandemic Agreement and related IHR amendments give the WHO too much power, potentially at the expense of local health systems and broader health equity. The centralized approach, coupled with WHO’s questionable track record during the COVID-19 pandemic, raises concerns about transparency, fairness, and effectiveness.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Pfizer’s election meddling exposed: Top scientists weaponized science to sway the 2020 vote, so they could benefit from unlawful mandates
In the high-stakes world of corporate power and political manipulation, few revelations strike as deeply as the allegation that Pfizer executives deliberately slowed COVID-19 vaccine trials to influence the 2020 U.S. election. Newly uncovered testimony suggests that top Pfizer R&D leaders orchestrated a delay in clinical testing—not for scientific caution, but to ensure results wouldn't emerge before Election Day. This bombshell, revealed through congressional investigations, paints a damning picture of a pharmaceutical giant willing to play god with public health for political and financial gain. The implications are staggering: a company entrusted with saving lives instead weaponized its science, suppressed critical data, and helped shape an election that led to unprecedented medical coercion.
Key points:
• Congressional investigators allege Pfizer intentionally slowed vaccine trials to avoid influencing the 2020 election.
• Former Pfizer scientist Dr. Philip Dormitzer reportedly admitted the delay was orchestrated by senior R&D leaders.
• The timing allowed Pfizer to avoid scrutiny before the election, then rapidly deploy mandates under a new administration.
• The scheme backfired as vaccine failures and injuries mounted, exposing the fraud behind the rushed approvals.
• The investigation raises urgent questions about corporate collusion, government corruption, and the erosion of medical ethics.
The election interference playbook
The 2020 presidential race was already one of the most contentious in U.S. history, with COVID-19 lockdowns, mask mandates, and promises of a "miracle" vaccine dominating the national conversation. Internal documents and whistleblower testimony now suggest Pfizer executives saw an opportunity—not to serve public health, but to exploit it. According to GSK’s testimony to Congress, Dr. Philip Dormitzer, a former Pfizer R&D leader, revealed that the company’s top three scientists deliberately slowed trial progress to avoid releasing data before November.
Dr. Dormitzer had told GSK employees that "in late 2020, the three most senior people in Pfizer R&D were involved in a decision to deliberately slow down clinical testing so that it would not be complete prior to the results of the presidential election that year."
This wasn’t about scientific rigor—it was about political timing. Had Pfizer released results in October, then-President Donald Trump could have claimed credit for Operation Warp Speed, potentially swaying voters eager for an end to pandemic restrictions. Instead, Pfizer’s calculated delay left the public in limbo, fueling frustration and anger that Democrats weaponized against Trump. By the time the vaccine was unveiled under the Biden administration, the groundwork had been laid for aggressive mandates, despite mounting evidence of the shot’s inefficacy and risks.
A legacy of deception and disaster
Pfizer’s alleged manipulation didn’t stop at the election. Once the Biden administration took office, the company’s vaccine—now shielded from pre-election scrutiny—was fast-tracked for emergency use, followed by coercive mandates affecting millions of workers, soldiers, and even children. Yet the science never supported the hype. Breakthrough infections surged, myocarditis cases spiked among young men, and whistleblowers exposed fraudulent trial practices.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Judge rules Kansas vaccine lawsuit against Pfizer must proceed in state court
In a landmark decision that could set a significant precedent, U.S. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree ruled that a lawsuit filed by the state of Kansas against Pfizer must proceed in state court. The case, which accuses Pfizer of misleading the public about the safety and efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty, was initially moved to federal court by Pfizer, citing protections under the PREP Act. However, Judge Crabtree rejected Pfizer's arguments, paving the way for the case to be heard in state court under Kansas consumer protection laws.
Allegations of deceptive marketing
The lawsuit, filed by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach in June 2024, alleges that Pfizer engaged in deceptive marketing practices by overstating the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. According to the complaint, Pfizer knew about but failed to disclose serious risks associated with the vaccine, including myocarditis, pericarditis and links to failed pregnancies and deaths. The suit also claims that Pfizer falsely asserted the vaccine's efficacy remained high over time and that it could prevent COVID-19 transmission, despite evidence to the contrary.
The case does not claim that the vaccine caused physical injuries or deaths, but rather focuses on allegations of consumer fraud and misrepresentation. As such, Judge Crabtree ruled that the PREP Act, which shields vaccine manufacturers from liability for injuries caused by vaccines, does not apply in this context. "That point alone ends the debate," Crabtree wrote in his ruling.
The PREP Act and Pfizer's legal strategy
Pfizer had argued that the PREP Act, enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic to protect vaccine manufacturers from liability, "completely preempts" consumer protection claims, thus justifying the case's removal to federal court. However, Judge Crabtree dismissed this argument, stating that the PREP Act was designed to protect against claims related to physical injuries, not against deceptive marketing practices.
"This first-of-its-kind ruling declares Pfizer’s deceptions aren’t afforded carte blanche treatment," said Ray Flores, senior outside counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), which supported the Kansas lawsuit. "This decision is important because it creates a viable path for Pfizer to potentially be held accountable for its wrongdoing on a massive scale."
The ruling could embolden other states that have expressed interest in pursuing similar lawsuits under state consumer protection laws. Until now, courts have generally allowed Pfizer to claim legal immunity under the PREP Act, but this decision provides a new pathway for holding vaccine manufacturers accountable for false or misleading claims.
Broader implications for vaccine litigation
The Kansas ruling comes amid a growing number of lawsuits challenging the scope of the PREP Act's liability shield. For example, in March 2025, the Supreme Court of North Carolina overturned a lower court's dismissal of a lawsuit challenging Pfizer's administration of vaccines to minors without parental consent. The court ruled that the PREP Act does not preempt state laws requiring parental consent for vaccination.
Additionally, a federal court ruled in November 2024 that the PREP Act does not extend to breach-of-contract claims, allowing a lawsuit against AstraZeneca to proceed. These cases suggest that while the PREP Act provides robust protections for vaccine manufacturers, it does not create a blanket immunity against all forms of legal action.
The path ahead for the Kansas lawsuit
Pfizer is expected to appeal the federal judge's ruling, but the decision represents a significant win for advocates who have long argued that vaccine manufacturers should be held accountable for misleading the public. "Without PREP protection, Pfizer will have to face the music and try to defend its lies in open court," Flores said.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Hidden betrayal: Moderna and Pfizer shots hijack immune cells to rewrite mRNA, prolonging spike protein production
For years, health authorities assured the public that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were a temporary intervention — delivering a brief genetic message before harmlessly fading away. But a shocking new study published in Nature reveals a far darker reality: These shots don’t just deliver instructions — they reprogram the body to extend their lifespan, forcing cells to produce spike protein far longer than disclosed. The bombshell findings expose a hidden layer of genetic manipulation, raising urgent questions about long-term risks, informed consent, and the true cost of Big Pharma’s rushed "miracle" technology.
Key points:
• A new study in Nature confirms Moderna and Pfizer’s mRNA shots induce the body to produce an enzyme (TENT5A) that rewrites the vaccine’s mRNA, doubling its tail length and prolonging spike protein production.
• Spike protein — linked to heart, brain, and immune damage — may persist for years, contradicting official claims it would last "a few weeks."
• Moderna’s own scientists admitted mRNA vaccines carry "unacceptable toxicity" risks in a 2024 paper, yet regulators greenlit them for billions.
• The process hijacks immune cells (macrophages), forcing them to stabilize and amplify the synthetic mRNA, turning the body into an unwitting accomplice.
• Novavax’s protein-based vaccine does not trigger this effect, suggesting the danger is unique to mRNA technology.
The body’s betrayal: How mRNA shots rewrite their own code
The Polish study (Krawczyk et al., 2025) reveals a chilling mechanism: After injection, immune cells detect the foreign mRNA and activate TENT5A — an enzyme that normally plays no role in vaccine responses. TENT5A then latches onto the vaccine’s genetic code, extending its poly(A) tail — a molecular "timer" that dictates how long mRNA survives. In some cases, Moderna’s mRNA tail doubled in length, from 100 to 200 nucleotides.
"This wasn’t just persistence — it was amplification," explains Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist and outspoken critic of COVID vaccine safety. "The body is essentially tricked into editing the shot’s instructions to make it last longer. This was never part of the clinical trials."
A timeline of deception
Public health officials repeatedly claimed mRNA vaccines were "short-lived." Dr. Paul Offit, a CDC advisor, stated in 2021 that spike protein production would last "a couple of weeks." Yet studies have since detected spike in blood samples for 187 days, 245 days, and even 709 days post-injection. Moderna’s internal documents acknowledge "challenges" with mRNA toxicity, yet these risks were buried beneath relentless propaganda touting the shots as "safe and effective."
The Nature study confirms the worst: The vaccines don’t just deliver a message — they reprogram the body to keep that message alive. "It’s like giving someone a self-replicating memo," says molecular biologist Dr. Jessica Rose. "The memo was supposed to be read once and discarded. Instead, the recipient photocopies it endlessly."
Why Novavax escapes the trap
Unlike mRNA shots, Novavax’s protein-based vaccine — which contains pre-made spike protein — does not trigger TENT5A activity. This critical distinction suggests the mRNA platform itself is the problem. "The lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in Pfizer and Moderna’s shots are the Trojan horse," explains immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle. "They smuggle synthetic mRNA into cells, but the payload doesn’t just fade away — it gets enhanced by the immune system."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
HHS launches Generation Gold Standard, ushering in UNIVERSAL FLU VACCINE spearheaded by Bill Gates
The quest for a universal flu vaccine has tantalized the scientific community for decades, and now the Trump administration, under the auspices of Dr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has launched a project called Generation Gold Standard, promising a paradigm shift in vaccine technology. However, this endeavor, which aims to produce a single flu shot that protects against all strains of the virus, including those that could cause a pandemic, raises more questions than it answers. Is this a bold leap forward, or a risky experiment that could jeopardize public health? This investigation reveals a complex web of financial interests, government corruption, and the relentless pursuit of a one-size-fits-all solution that may not live up to its promise.
While the U.S. government has poured $500 million into this project, much of the groundwork for this ambitious vaccine was laid by Bill Gates and his foundation. With a history of targeting developing countries with profit-driven vaccination programs, Gates’ involvement in this project warrants a closer look. The universal flu vaccine, if successful, could represent a lucrative market for pharmaceutical companies and billions in profit for Gates’ ventures. But the use of an antiquated whole-killed virus approach, abandoned decades ago for its side effects and inefficiency, demands scrutiny. Is the new HHS and Secretary Kennedy on the brink of a breakthrough, or are we rushing headfirst into another dangerous experiment that only drives influenza mutations further?
Key points:
• The Trump administration has launched a project called Generation Gold Standard to develop a universal flu vaccine.
• The project plans to use a whole killed virus approach, a technology that is over 40 years old and known for its side effects.
• Bill Gates and his foundation have invested millions into universal flu vaccine research, with the potential for significant profits.
• The project raises concerns about transparent funding and the lack of independent, public review.
• Critics question why the government is betting on only one vaccine technology instead of exploring a wide range of innovations.
• Others question why the government refuses to recognize decades of flu vaccine failures and finally admit that all immunizations for respiratory infections will inevitably fail and drive mutations.
The history of flu vaccine technology
Over the past century, the push for a universal flu vaccine has quietly become an obsession for public health officials and pharmaceutical giants. The annual flu vaccine is a profit-driven affair, with more than $2 billion in annual sales in the U.S. alone. But the recurring need for updates—driven by the virus’s ever-mutating strains—has long been a source of frustration. Efforts to create a more permanent solution gained traction in the mid-20th century, when “killed virus” vaccines began to take hold. These vaccines used whole, inactivated viruses to stimulate the immune system, but they often came with significant side effects, including high fevers and seizures. By the 1980s, more advanced technologies such as recombinant and mRNA vaccines emerged, offering safer and more effective alternatives.
Yet, while newer technologies have shown promise, the U.S. government has now chosen to revert to the decades-old killed virus approach. Proponents of this decision argue that it is necessary to move quickly, given the potential for future pandemics. However, critics like Dr. Gregory Poland, a vaccine expert at the Atria Academy of Science and Medicine, find this approach puzzling. “We have live attenuated nasal spray influenza vaccines,” Poland says. “We have recombinant influenza vaccines. We have an mRNA-based influenza vaccine. So why would you put all your eggs in one basket?”
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
CHILD mRNA DEATH JABS: ‘Smart Moms Ask’ healthcare group launches campaign to stop injecting children with the deadliest “vaccine” ever created
Will the 100-year FDA tradition of “rubber stamping” toxic drugs and deadly vaccines finally come to a close under the new HHS led by Trump, RFK Jr. and Dr. Makary? The American Medical Association started all of this a century ago, with their fake AMA seal of approval that any pharma thugs could simply pay top dollar for and get their deadly drugs “approved” and propaganda published in JAMA.
The Covid spike prion jabs are no exception, in fact, these biological weapons of mass destruction have ruined millions of children’s lives and depopulated the planet of an untold number of babies in and out of the womb.
Now there’s a healthcare group heading up a campaign to end the madness and they’re called “Smart Moms Ask,” because any parent with a brain would ask all the tough questions about vaccines, especially ones that trick your cells into creating millions of prions that the immune system attacks in all vital organs, including the brain.
Healthy children were at zero risk from Covid anyhow, so just the thought of having blood-clogging mRNA jabs on the childhood vaccine schedule is an atrocity
A coalition of medical professionals and concerned mothers is urging federal health agencies to remove COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood immunization schedule, citing safety concerns and a lack of proven benefit for young children. On Tuesday, the Independent Medical Alliance (IMA) launched the "Smart Moms Ask" campaign, calling on Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Congress to reconsider vaccine recommendations for minors. The push comes amid ongoing debates over vaccine safety, transparency, and the role of emergency-use medical products in routine pediatric care.
The IMA, founded by critical care specialists, is collecting signatures for a petition demanding that federal agencies reassess COVID-19 vaccine mandates for children. Dr. Kat Lindley, IMA Fellowship program director, told The Defender, "Moms have been bullied into accepting mRNA shots with devastating risks. We’re uniting our voices to demand transparency and safety for our kids." She emphasized that data does not support vaccinating healthy children, pointing to risks like myocarditis and autoimmune disorders.
Pediatrician Dr. Michelle Perro, who signed the petition, called the campaign a necessary response to what she described as unjustified vaccine policies. "It is incomprehensible that a campaign had to be initiated to do what’s right for children and pregnant mothers," she said, referencing reports of adverse effects, including weakened immunity and miscarriages.
How COVID-19 Vaccines Ended Up on the Schedule
The CDC added COVID-19 vaccines to the childhood immunization schedule in February 2023 following a unanimous advisory committee vote. The decision means most doctors recommend the shots, and many states require them for school attendance. However, unlike fully licensed vaccines, the pediatric versions remain under emergency use authorization (EUA), with less stringent safety data requirements.
Critics argue that the risks outweigh the benefits, given the low incidence of severe COVID-19 in children. "The incidence of severe illness was always near zero," Perro said, "yet we’re seeing cardiac, immunologic, and neurologic issues post-vaccination."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Breakthrough study links mRNA vaccines to irreversible female fertility loss
A groundbreaking study published in the journal Vaccines has ignited urgent concerns worldwide, suggesting that mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines may be causing irreversible damage to female ovarian reserves in rats. Turkish researchers observed a staggering 60% reduction in primordial follicles — the foundational cells necessary for fertility — in rats administered mRNA vaccines. The findings, which experts say warrant immediate scrutiny in humans, align with mounting real-world data showing plummeting global birth rates and rising miscarriages among vaccinated populations. The study, alongside complementary research and medical testimonies, has galvanized calls to halt mRNA vaccine mandates, exposing potential systemic risks to reproductive health and human liberty.
Evidence emerges: Vaccines linked to 60% drop in irreplaceable egg cells
The peer-reviewed Turkish study, led by eight researchers, analyzed the effects of Pfizer-style mRNA and Sinovac’s inactivated vaccines on 30 female rats. After two human-equivalent doses, mRNA-vaccinated rats showed a shocking 60% decline in primordial follicles (an average of 42.4 per ovary compared to 106.7 in unvaccinated rats). Non-mRNA vaccines also caused significant harm, with a 34% reduction.
Primordial follicles, described as “the foundation of fertility” by the authors, are finite and non-renewable — women are born with all the eggs they will ever possess. “Biologically irreversible” damage to this pool, as seen in the study, means permanent fertility loss if replicated in humans. “This loss does not regenerate,” emphasized epidemiologist Nic Hulscher in his Substack analysis, noting that such harm could accelerate early menopause and depress global birth rates.
Dr. Margaret Christensen, a gynecologist at the Carpathia Collaborative, corroborated these findings with clinical observations: “The impact on fertility and menstrual cycles has been alarming. We’re seeing rising miscarriages and fetal deaths — not just decreased conception.”
From lab to real-world declines: Human data mirrors ovarian damage
The Turkish study’s implications extend beyond rodent models. A concurrent preprint on over 1.3 million Czech women (ages 18–39) revealed vaccine recipients had 33% fewer successful pregnancies compared to unvaccinated peers, even as fertility treatments surged. The Czech Republic’s total fertility rate dropped 21% during the study period.
“This isn’t theoretical,” said Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St. George’s, University of London, who called rat studies “a standard and reliable model for evaluating fertility.” He pointed to lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) — the delivery vehicles in mRNA vaccines — as a critical culprit. LNPs, he noted, exhibit a “particular preference for ovaries,” where they trigger mRNA-driven spike protein production. Spike protein has been linked to placental harm, fetal death and inflammation — mechanisms aligned with the Turkish study’s observed increases in caspase-3 (a cell-death enzyme) and inflammatory markers (TGF-?1, VEGF), which cause follicle death and fibrosis.
Independent research has corroborated these biologic pathways. A BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth study found higher miscarriage rates in vaccinated women, while a 2023 Molecular Therapy paper revealed LNP-mRNA crosses into fetal tissue within an hour. “The Pfizer Papers” whistleblower Naomi Wolf noted that LNPs’ reproductive harm has been known since 2017, predating the pandemic.
Growing movement for transparency: Calls to suspend mRNA use intensify
The study’s release coincides with escalating global protests against vaccine mandates and what critics call institutional secrecy. “These data show our public agencies have compromised the capacity to create life,” wrote Hulscher, citing the “Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex” as a suppression force.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
FDA approves Novavax COVID vaccine grown in moth cells — 100% efficacy claim based on just 14 placebo cases, raising serious safety concerns
While the mainstream media touts Novavax’s Nuvaxovid as a "safer, more traditional" alternative to mRNA vaccines, the truth behind its FDA approval is far more unsettling. The agency green-lit this genetically engineered, insect-cell-derived vaccine based on shockingly weak evidence — just 14 moderate-to-severe COVID cases in the placebo group, with zero in the vaccinated group. This flimsy foundation allowed Novavax to claim 100% efficacy, a statistical illusion that crumbles under scrutiny.
Worse, the FDA bypassed its own advisory committee, ignored post-market reports of heart inflammation, menstrual disruptions, and even deaths, and deferred long-term safety studies for years. The public is being sold a dangerous illusion of safety while regulators and corporations collude to push another experimental product onto an unsuspecting population.
Key points:
• The FDA granted full approval to Novavax’s Nuvaxovid despite its efficacy claim resting on just 14 placebo cases — a statistically meaningless sample size.
• The vaccine is produced using genetically modified moth cells infected with a baculovirus, raising contamination and informed consent concerns.
• No severe COVID cases occurred in vaccinated participants — not because the vaccine worked flawlessly, but because the trial was too small and short (only 3 months).
• Post-market data from Australia revealed alarming rates of myocarditis, pericarditis, anaphylaxis, and menstrual disturbances — none of which were properly studied before approval.
• The FDA skipped advisory committee review, dismissing known risks while deferring critical safety studies for up to a decade.
The illusion of "100% efficacy"
The FDA’s approval hinges on a New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) study that followed participants for a mere three months, with only 14 moderate-to-severe COVID cases in the placebo group. This microscopic sample size allowed Novavax to claim 100% efficacy against severe disease — a marketing triumph, but a scientific farce.
Dr. Peter Doshi, senior editor of The BMJ, has long criticized such statistical sleight of hand, pointing out that small, short trials are designed to inflate efficacy while hiding long-term risks. In this case, the trial didn’t even include a single vaccinated senior citizen with severe COVID — meaning the claim of protection for high-risk groups is pure speculation.
How Novavax’s vaccine is made: A Frankenstein science experiment
Unlike mRNA shots, which instruct the body to produce spike proteins, Novavax’s vaccine pre-manufactures the spike protein inside moth cells. Here’s how it works:
• Genetically modified baculovirus infects moth cells – Scientists insert the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein gene into a baculovirus, which is then used to infect fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) cells.
• Insect cells become spike protein factories – The infected moth cells mass-produce the spike protein, which is then harvested and purified.
• Adjuvant boosts immune response – The spike proteins are mixed with Matrix-M, an immune-stimulating adjuvant derived from tree bark.
But there’s a catch: nearly all Sf9 moth cell lines are contaminated with Sf-rhabdovirus, an RNA virus that could theoretically end up in the final product. The FDA has no long-term data on how these contaminants — or the spike protein itself — might affect human biology.
Post-market red flags: Heart damage, menstrual chaos, and ignored deaths
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Unlike mRNA vaccines, Novavax’s protein-based shot — which delivers pre-made spike protein — does not trigger TENT5A activity. Immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle explained, "The lipid nanoparticles in Pfizer and Moderna’s shots are the Trojan horse. They smuggle synthetic mRNA into cells, but the payload doesn’t just fade away — it gets enhanced by the immune system."
The Nature study challenges the foundational safety claims of mRNA vaccines, revealing a mechanism that could lead to prolonged spike protein exposure and unknown health risks. With mounting evidence of regulatory oversights and undisclosed dangers, the findings demand urgent scrutiny. As the scientific community grapples with these revelations, millions who received the shots now face unanswered questions about their long-term well-being. The era of blind trust in rushed medical interventions may be over—but for many, the consequences are just beginning.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Hyping the next plandemic: Researchers in Nebraska develop vaccine targeting all flu strains
Scientists at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) have developed a single vaccine that targets multiple strains of influenza – including swine flu, bird flu and seasonal flu – fueling concerns that the next plandemic is on the horizon.
The experimental vaccine, designed using advanced computational modeling, has shown promise in protecting pigs against diverse influenza A viruses. The researchers have also expressed optimism that the injection will protect birds and humans from these pathogens. But skeptics warn that such vaccines may carry unforeseen dangers, including immune suppression and failure against mutated strains.
In a study published late last month in Nature Communications, the UNL researchers detailed how the Epigraph vaccine – named after the software used to design it – outperformed existing commercial vaccines in swine trials. Pigs vaccinated with Epigraph developed robust immunity against 12 different flu strains – including the H1N1 virus responsible for the 2009 swine flu pandemic. The H1N1 strain infected a quarter of the global population and killed over half a million people.
Dr. Eric Weaver, the study's lead author, called the findings a critical step toward a universal flu vaccine that could last a decade or longer. "If we can prevent influenza in swine, we can cut off the virus’s evolutionary advantage," he added. According to Weaver, also the director of the Nebraska Center for Virology at UNL, pigs often act as a "mixing vessel" for dangerous zoonotic jumps between birds and humans.
Is the Epigraph flu injection a Trojan horse for the next plandemic?
The Epigraph vaccine was developed after researchers analyzed over 6,000 influenza strains from the past century to identify common viral markers (epitopes) that trigger immune responses. Unlike traditional vaccines, which target rapidly mutating surface proteins, targeting these epitopes could lead to broader, longer-lasting protection.
Weaver's team is now testing a dual H1/H3 variant vaccine, with hopes of eventual human trials. However, no timeline has been set for public availability.
Despite the optimism, critics argue that such vaccines may be ineffective against future mutations or even weaken natural immunity. Others, meanwhile, argue that such vaccines and their rollout under government-backed vaccination programs prioritize profit over safety.
Historical context supports caution. Past flu vaccines have sometimes offered limited protection, and the 1976 swine flu debacle saw mass vaccinations halted after rare neurological side effects emerged.
The stakes are high; influenza A infects up to 15 percent of humans annually, with H1 and H3 subtypes causing thousands of deaths. The European Union recently flagged pigs as a potential catalyst for a deadly bird flu mutation transmissible to humans. Weaver's research, funded by the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, aims to preempt such crises.
"We're on the precipice of a third wave of vaccines – lifelong and universal," he said. But as with all medical breakthroughs, the balance between innovation and risk remains delicate. Vaccines like Epigraph may cause more harm than good, as they undermine the body's natural immunity.
One cannot help but notice, however, that the news of Epigraph's supposed "promise" comes amid reports of the flu virus "jumping from animals to humans." This same pattern was observed during the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. But sooner or later, people may see Epigraph become ubiquitous amid this new "plandemic" in the same manner as the mRNA vaccines.
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree talking about a study that shows getting the flu vaccine increases one's chances of catching influenza.
https://www.brighteon.com/8f929852-c5cb-4471-9476-4de9afd52361
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Biden’s autopen scandal exposed: Staffers accused of signing key documents amid mental decline
The White House is embroiled in a constitutional crisis as House investigators uncover evidence that former President Joe Biden’s autopen was used to authorize critical pardons and executive orders during a period of alleged cognitive decline.
Rep. James Comer (R-KY), Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, revealed this weekend that his team has identified the staffers responsible and plans to subpoena them if they refuse to testify. The controversy, first ignited by President Donald Trump’s declaration that autopen-signed pardons were “void,” now threatens to expose a shadow government operating behind the scenes of Biden’s presidency.
The autopen deception
According to Comer, congressional investigators have obtained hard evidence showing that Biden’s autopen was used to sign pardons—including those benefiting his family—and executive orders while the president was “clearly in mental decline.” The Oversight Committee’s findings suggest that Biden’s handlers may have bypassed the chief executive entirely, raising alarming questions about who was truly running the country.
“Yeah, that’s hard evidence early in President Biden’s term,” Comer told Fox News. “It clearly shows that he was in significant mental decline. It raises questions about who was actually making the decisions.”
The scandal gained traction in March when Trump denounced the autopen-signed pardons as illegitimate. “Joe Biden did not sign them,” Trump posted on Truth Social, “and the people that did may have committed a crime.” He later demanded accountability, asking, “Why did the Auto Pen give Schiff a Pardon? They almost destroyed our Country. They should all be in jail!!”
A cover-up unravels
The Oversight Project previously revealed that every pardon signed on January 19 bore the same autopen signature, suggesting a systemic effort to conceal Biden’s inability to fulfill his duties. Journalist Cristina Laila of The Gateway Pundit reported that former White House Staff Secretary Neera Tanden allegedly facilitated the autopen usage while Biden was on vacation. Tanden, a controversial figure linked to the debunked Russiagate narrative, has yet to publicly address the allegations.
Comer’s committee is now preparing to issue subpoenas. “We think we’ve identified who the staffers are,” he said. “We’re going to bring everyone we believe was involved in any role in the use of the autopen. If they decline, they will receive a subpoena and face a full-blown deposition.”
The investigation coincides with newly released audio from Special Counsel Robert Hur’s October 2023 interview with Biden, which exposed the president’s alarming memory lapses. Biden struggled to recall the year his son Beau died, the date of Trump’s election, and even basic terms like “fax machine.” Hur’s report described Biden as a “sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory,” further fueling concerns about his fitness for office.
The broader implications
Trump has framed the autopen scandal as part of a larger conspiracy, linking it to election interference and Democratic corruption. “Whoever had control of the ‘AUTOPEN’ is looking to be a bigger and bigger scandal by the moment,” he posted. Critics argue the White House’s reliance on the autopen, coupled with Biden’s documented cognitive struggles, proves that unelected operatives were making decisions without transparency.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Pandemic architect Dr. Jeremy Farrar promoted amid World Health Organization’s leadership shakeup
The World Health Organization (WHO) has promoted Briton Dr. Jeremy Farrar, a key architect of controversial Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic policies, as part of a sweeping restructuring that includes deep budget cuts and staff reductions.
Reuters first reported Farrar's promotion from chief scientist to assistant director-general on Wednesday, May 14. In his new position, Farrar will now oversee health promotion, disease prevention. and control – a role that solidifies his influence within the global health body as it grapples with financial instability and waning credibility.
The restructuring, which aims to reset the WHO's image, also sidelines longtime figures like Dr. Mike Ryan and Dr. Bruce Aylward. Their replacements include Dr. Chikwe Ihekweazu, a Nigerian-German expert now leading health emergencies, and Dr. Sylvie Briand from France, the new chief scientist.
Farrar's ascent marks a pivotal moment for the WHO, which is slashing its management team from 14 to seven leaders and reducing its budget by 21 percent for 2026-2027, down to $4.2 billion. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus acknowledged the cuts would force the organization to scale back operations, including closing offices in high-income countries.
The downsizing comes just months after the second Trump administration declared the U.S. would withdraw from the WHO Washington's decision to exit the global health body in January deprived it of its largest donor – something critics say reflects broader disillusionment with the agency's pandemic response.
Farrar's secret role in silencing the lab leak theory
Before joining the WHO, Farrar directed the Wellcome Trust and played a central role in shaping lockdowns, mask mandates and mass vaccination campaigns. Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst suggested Farrar may have been the WHO's de facto leader during the pandemic, wielding outsized influence over its policies.
He also collaborated on a pivotal March 2020 paper in Nature Medicine that dismissed the lab-leak theory of COVID-19's origins. Though not listed as a co-author, Farrar worked closely with American infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci and others to draft the paper, a move critics allege was an ethical breach. His ties to Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance – which funded coronavirus research at China's Wuhan Institute of Virology – have further fueled scrutiny.
Richard Ebright, molecular biologist at Rutgers University, slammed Farrar's promotion as a reward for misinformation. He accused the Briton of helping "defraud the global public" about COVID-19's origins.
Farrar's promotion comes weeks before global leaders gather in Geneva to debate a contentious pandemic agreement. The WHO's proposed pandemic agreement, intended to centralize global health governance, remains in limbo after failing to gain consensus last year. Independent journalist James Roguski noted that even if adopted, the treaty cannot take effect until 2026 due to procedural delays.
As the WHO scrambles to offset lost U.S. funding, it is turning to private donors like the Gates Foundation, its second-largest backer. Yet Brownstone Institute President Jeffrey Tucker of the Brownstone Institute argued that the global health body's credibility is irreparably damaged.
"The future is not with the WHO," said Tucker, who founded the think tank in 2021. "They massively bungled the pandemic with no admission of wrongdoing."
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree discussing the U.S. Congress' probe on Dr. Jeremy Farrar's role in obfuscating the origins of COVID-19 in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/64c53d97-5c06-4ecd-9f5a-99e066300622
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Victory for health freedom: HHS drops COVID-19 vaccine mandates for children and pregnant women
In a monumental win against medical tyranny,the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is finally rolling back its reckless, one-size-fits-all COVID-19 vaccination recommendations for children, teenagers and pregnant women—a long-overdue correction to years of fear-driven propaganda. This bold reversal, first reported by the Wall Street Journal on May 15, signals a turning point in the fight for medical freedom and informed consent, as the truth about unnecessary vaccine risks for low-risk populations can no longer be ignored.
Under the leadership of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—a fearless advocate for transparency and accountability in public health—the federal government is finally acknowledging what independent scientists and medical professionals have warned about for years: COVID-19 poses minimal risk to healthy children, and the aggressive push to vaccinate them was never based on sound science, but rather on corporate profit and political coercion.
The collapse of the COVID-19 vaccine narrative
For far too long, federal agencies like the CDC and FDA ignored alarming safety signals, dismissed mounting injury reports and suppressed dissenting voices in their zeal to push experimental mRNA shots on the entire population. Now, the dam is breaking.
• CDC backpedals: The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which once blindly rubber-stamped COVID-19 vaccines for infants as young as six months, is now quietly retreating from its extremist stance.
• FDA admits lack of evidence: Even FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary conceded on May 15 that there is no clear benefit in forcing COVID-19 vaccines on young, healthy children—a stunning admission from an agency that once claimed these shots were "safe and effective" without long-term safety data.
• Global shift: The U.S. is finally aligning with sensible countries like the U.K. and Australia, where routine COVID-19 vaccination for healthy children was never recommended—because the science never justified it.
The truth about vaccine injuries can no longer be hidden
With over 1.6 million reported vaccine injuries and deaths in the U.S. alone (per VAERS data), the catastrophic toll of these rushed, under-tested shots is undeniable. Myocarditis in young males, neurological disorders and reproductive harm are just a few of the devastating side effects that were downplayed or outright ignored by health authorities.
Kennedy’s HHS is now demanding higher safety standards, including placebo-controlled trials and real-world evidence before approving future vaccines—a stark contrast to the corrupt "Warp Speed" debacle that prioritized Big Pharma profits over public health.
The end of medical coercion—a win for parents and freedom
This policy shift is a direct result of relentless pressure from medical freedom advocates, parents and courageous doctors like Dr. Peter McCullough, who exposed the fraudulent narrative that children needed COVID-19 vaccines. With only 13% of children and 14% of pregnant women opting for the latest booster, the American people have voted with their feet, rejecting fearmongering in favor of common sense.
The era of medical authoritarianism is crumbling. No longer will parents be bullied into injecting their children with unnecessary, risky vaccines. No longer will pregnant women be guilt-tripped into accepting experimental medical products without proper long-term safety data.
What’s next? The fight for accountability
While this is a historic victory, the battle is far from over. Big Pharma and their captured regulators will not give up their power easily. The next steps must include:
• Full investigations into fraudulent clinical trials and censorship of vaccine injuries.
• Legal action against those who lied to the public and violated informed consent.
• Permanent bans on childhood COVID-19 vaccine mandates in schools and healthcare settings.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
CDC’s dangerous gamble: Pregnant women and their unborn babies at put at unreasonable RISK from SIX toxic vaccines
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) insists that pregnant women need at least six vaccines, three of which are in a combination vaccine—COVID-19, flu, RSV, and Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis)—to protect themselves and their babies. But what the agency doesn’t advertise is the toxic cocktail of neurotoxins, foreign DNA, and heavy metals these shots inject directly into vulnerable mothers and their developing fetuses. With mounting evidence linking these vaccines to miscarriage, preterm birth, and neurological damage, why is the CDC doubling down on its reckless recommendations?
Key points:
• The CDC pushes four vaccines on pregnant women despite evidence of serious risks, including miscarriage and fetal harm.
• COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to a 33% drop in successful pregnancies, yet the CDC continues to recommend them.
• Flu shots contain mercury, a neurotoxin, and have been tied to a 4,250% spike in fetal death reports.
• The RSV vaccine, pushed by Pfizer, may increase preterm births and offers questionable protection.
• Tdap vaccines contain aluminum, a neurotoxin linked to autism, yet the CDC mandates them in the third trimester.
• Medical professionals once advised pregnant women to avoid taking drugs, but today insist that direct injections of toxic substances are necessary.
Pregnant women were once advised to avoid toxic substances and drugs during pregnancy
Medical professionals have long advised pregnant women to avoid taking drugs—including prescription medications, recreational substances, and even some over-the-counter remedies—unless absolutely necessary. This caution stems from several key concerns:
• Fetal development risks – Many drugs can cross the placental barrier, potentially interfering with critical stages of fetal growth. Certain medications have been linked to birth defects, developmental delays, or miscarriage.
• Lack of comprehensive studies – Ethical limitations mean few drugs are rigorously tested on pregnant women. As a result, the full effects of many substances on unborn babies remain unknown, leading doctors to err on the side of caution.
• Uterine contraction risks - Some herbal medicines are known to cause uterine contractions, leading to preterm labor, spontaneous abortion, or worse.
• Potential for addiction & withdrawal – Opioids, nicotine, and other addictive substances can cause neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), where newborns suffer withdrawal symptoms after birth.
• Impact on pregnancy health – Some drugs may increase risks of complications like preterm labor, low birth weight, or preeclampsia. Vaccine ingredients such as aluminum could cause different types of fetal malformations, damaging brain development and competing with essential nutrients.
The CDC’s reckless COVID-19 vaccine push
Despite COVID-19 rapidly mutating back in 2020 and posing minimal risk to pregnant women for years, the CDC aggressively promotes the mRNA shots, ignoring alarming data. A recent study of 1.3 million Czech women found vaccinated mothers had 33% fewer successful pregnancies than unvaccinated women. Another study in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth revealed that vaccinated pregnant women who contracted COVID-19 were more likely to miscarry than unvaccinated women.
Even more damning, Pfizer’s own clinical trials lost records for 234 pregnant women, and of the 36 tracked, over 80% lost their babies. Yet, the CDC still claims the shots are "safe and effective." The data clearly shows that the mRNA-induced spike proteins put strain on the pregnancy, leading to miscarriages. Even occupational exposure to recently vaccinated individuals is one of the concerns with mRNA technology, leading to secondary harms to pregnant women and their babies.
Jessica Rose, Ph.D., an immunologist, warns: "The data from recent studies supports clear harms, not benefits."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Trump administration probes publisher of influential COVID origins paper over alleged Fauci influence
The Trump administration is investigating whether the authors and publisher of a pivotal early COVID-19 study allowed Dr. Anthony Fauci and other top health officials to influence its conclusions in exchange for federal funding, according to documents obtained by The Disinformation Chronicle. The 2020 paper, titled "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," dismissed the lab-leak theory in favor of a natural zoonotic origin, shaping global discourse on the pandemic’s beginnings. Now, newly revealed Department of Justice (DOJ) letters suggest potential conflicts of interest — raising fresh questions about scientific transparency and political interference in public health.
The paper that shaped the pandemic narrative
Published in Nature Medicine in March 2020, "Proximal Origin" became one of the most cited scientific papers of the year, accessed over 6 million times and referenced by more than 2,000 media outlets. Its authors — including virologists Kristian Andersen and Robert Garry — initially privately expressed concerns that COVID-19 might have been engineered or accidentally leaked from a lab, according to emails later uncovered by congressional investigators. Yet the final paper concluded that a lab origin was "improbable," aligning with public statements from Dr. Fauci and then-NIH Director Francis Collins.
Collins promoted it on the NIH blog, and Fauci cited it during a White House briefing, declaring its findings "totally consistent with a jump of species from an animal to a human." Critics, however, allege the paper was weaponized to suppress legitimate debate — a claim bolstered by internal communications showing Andersen and Garry privately doubted their own conclusions.
Emails reveal behind-the-scenes pressure
Unredacted emails obtained through FOIA lawsuits reveal that in February 2020, Andersen told Fauci and Collins that SARS-CoV-2’s genome contained features that "look engineered." Days later, Wellcome Trust Director Jeremy Farrar — later the WHO’s chief scientist — urged revisions to the paper’s language, softening skepticism about lab manipulation. By March, the authors had pivoted, publicly dismissing lab-leak theories despite privately acknowledging gaps in their analysis.
Months after publication, Andersen received a $1.88 million NIH grant for pandemic research — a timing critics call suspicious. In sworn testimony, Andersen denied any quid pro quo, but documents reviewed by The Intercept contradicted his claims, showing the grant was finalized post-publication.
Justice Department’s fraud probe
In a March 2025 letter to Nature Medicine publisher Joao Monteiro, then-interim U.S. Attorney Edward R. Martin Jr. questioned whether the journal’s editorial independence was compromised by financial ties to funders like the NIH. Martin, now leading a DOJ "Weaponization Working Group," cited potential violations of fraud and postal statutes, asking Monteiro to address allegations of misleading readers.
The probe has drawn backlash from media outlets like the New York Times, which warned of a "chilling effect" on scientific publishing. But transparency advocates argue the investigation is overdue. "When funders dictate conclusions, it corrupts the scientific process," said an anonymous NIH researcher in a Disinformation Chronicle essay.
A legacy of doubt and unanswered questions
Despite mounting evidence supporting the lab-leak theory — including assessments by the FBI and Department of Energy — Nature Medicine has refused to retract "Proximal Origin." An online petition by Biosafety Now demanding retraction has gathered 5,700 signatures, while congressional hearings have exposed flaws in the paper’s peer review.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The parallels to historical pharmaceutical scandals are chilling. Like Big Tobacco’s suppression of cancer data or Purdue Pharma’s deceptive opioid marketing, Pfizer’s actions suggest a pattern of profit-driven deceit. The difference? This time, the federal government became a willing accomplice, using mandates to force an untested product on the public while silencing dissent.
With Congress now demanding answers, Pfizer faces a crisis of credibility. If proven, the allegations reveal a dangerous collusion between corporate power and political agendas—one that sacrificed transparency, informed consent, and medical ethics for control. The question isn’t just whether Pfizer manipulated an election, but whether the American people will finally hold these entities accountable for the lies that upended their lives.
For those who resisted the narrative from the start, this investigation is vindication. For those who trusted the system, it’s a wake-up call. And for Pfizer, it may be the beginning of the end.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
As the case moves back to state court, it will now be up to Kansas to prove its claims under the state's Consumer Protection Act. The outcome of the case could have far-reaching implications for vaccine litigation and the broader debate over vaccine safety and transparency.
A watershed moment in vaccine accountability
Judge Crabtree's decision marks a turning point in the legal landscape surrounding COVID-19 vaccines. By rejecting Pfizer's claim of immunity under the PREP Act, the court has opened the door for states to hold vaccine manufacturers accountable for deceptive marketing practices. As other states consider similar lawsuits, this ruling could serve as a roadmap for challenging the scope of the PREP Act and ensuring that vaccine manufacturers adhere to truthful and transparent practices. The case will now return to state court, where the full extent of Pfizer's alleged wrongdoing will be examined in a public forum.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The unanswered questions
• Long-term damage: If spike protein lingers for years, what does that mean for cardiovascular, neurological, and autoimmune risks?
• Informed consent: Were patients ever told their bodies might rewrite the vaccine’s code?
• Regulatory failure: Why did agencies fast-track these shots while ignoring red flags about mRNA stability?
The Nature study’s authors frame TENT5A’s role as a way to "enhance efficacy." But for millions already injured, "efficacy" is a euphemism for uncontrolled biological manipulation. The truth is clear: These shots were never as temporary as claimed. The question now is: How many lives will be forever altered by their hidden toll?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The role of Bill Gates
Bill Gates, long a key player in global health initiatives, has been a vocal advocate for universal flu vaccine research. His Foundations’ funding of research teams across the world has fueled significant advancements in the field. However, the alignment of these efforts with his own company, Microsoft, and his financial stake in pharmaceutical giants further complicates matters. As countries in developing nations have begun experiencing a dramatic increase in flu vaccine distribution, these regions have seen a corresponding rise in autoimmune diseases. Is Gates’ altruism genuine, or is there a darker agenda underpinning his philanthropy?
Despite the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s significant investment in flu vaccine research, their approach has often been criticized for prioritizing corporate profits over public health. The recent push for a universal flu vaccine is no exception. Critics argue that the foundation’s involvement may lead to a system where vaccines are designed not for their efficacy but for their marketability and profitability. With a history of partnerships with pharmaceutical giants and murky financial interests, it is essential for the public to remain vigilant and question the motives behind these endeavors.
Transparency and accountability needed first
The Trump administration’s investment in the Generation Gold Standard project comes under intense scrutiny for its lack of transparency. Moreover, how can the public trust new universal flu vaccines when over seven decades of annual shots have yielded terrible results? The NIH developed the current technology without public review, and the funding allocation process remains opaque. Echoing concerns from independent vaccine experts, Dr. Jesse Goodman, a former FDA vaccine expert now at Georgetown University, emphasized the importance of open scientific competition and transparency. “If you’re going to do this, have an open scientific competition for the best ideas. There should be transparency for the process of how to allot funding,” Goodman said.
The project’s ambitious timeline of having the vaccine ready for testing next year and available to the public within four years is nothing short of audacious. While rapid advancements in medical science are to be celebrated, the potential risks of rushing such a project cannot be ignored. Transparency and independent oversight are crucial to ensuring that public health remains the priority, not corporate profits.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Experts outlined several ways COVID-19 vaccines could be removed from the schedule:
• CDC Action: The CDC director could unilaterally reverse the recommendation or convene an advisory panel, as happened with the Rotashield vaccine in 1999 after it was linked to infant complications.
• FDA Intervention: The FDA could suspend EUA status based on safety data or mislabeling concerns.
• HHS Emergency Declaration: HHS Secretary Kennedy could terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration, which underpins EUAs. Former pharmaceutical executive Sasha Latypova argued this would be the fastest route, though she questioned whether political constraints would allow it.
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary hinted at a potential policy shift in a recent interview, stating, "I’d love to see the evidence to show that giving young, healthy children another COVID shot would help them, but that evidence does not exist."
The "Smart Moms Ask" campaign reflects growing scrutiny of COVID-19 vaccine policies for children, fueled by concerns over safety, transparency, and the appropriateness of emergency-use products in routine care. With federal agencies under pressure to reevaluate their stance, the coming weeks may determine whether the shots remain a standard recommendation—or if parental advocacy succeeds in reshaping public health policy.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Medical professionals and advocacy groups are uniting for action. Dalgleish, echoing advocates like Karl Jablonowski of Children’s Health Defense, urged immediate pauses: “The details here about AMH antibodies and follicular damage are screaming—stop these vaccines now.” Jablonowski emphasized that harms are not hypothetical; many vaccine victims “were harmed before [safety] studies began,” with research now “a damage assessment.”
Dr. Robert Chandler, MD, whose prior work exposed vaccine-linked fertility declines, highlighted broader societal stakes: “Nineteen months after mass mRNA rollouts, birth rate drops have occurred from Europe to Taiwan. This isn’t happenstance.”
A critical crossroads for reproductive rights and global health policy
The convergence of animal and human data paints a dire picture: mRNA vaccines may be eroding fertility with irreversible consequences. “If this applies to humans, it’s a generational crisis,” said Christensen. Critics argue that institutions prioritized profit and compliance over mothers’ rights, citing systemic failures to fund independent safety research.
As calls for vaccine skepticism grow, so does the urgency of alternatives — natural health practices, rigorous informed consent and independent journalism — stand as vital defenses for truth and autonomy. Protecting women’s bodies must come before corporate agendas.
In an era where trust has eroded, this study underscores a pivotal question: Can societies preserve true human liberty when mechanisms to perpetuate life itself are weaponized?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
CDC disbands advisory committee responsible for controlling infections in hospitals
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has disbanded a key advisory committee responsible for shaping national infection control guidelines in hospitals and healthcare facilities, a move critics warn could leave the U.S. vulnerable to emerging pathogens and antimicrobial resistance.
The decision, confirmed by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), follows an executive order from President Donald Trump aimed at reducing federal advisory committees deemed "unnecessary." The abrupt termination of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) has drawn sharp criticism from medical professionals who argue the panel played a critical role in safeguarding patient and healthcare worker safety.
Established in 1991, HICPAC provided evidence-based recommendations on preventing healthcare-associated infections – including protocols for hand hygiene, isolation precautions and mask use. Hospitals across the nation adopted the guidelines put forward by the now-disbanded advisory committee.
The committee's dissolution, which took effect on March 31, was only communicated to members in May – months after scheduled meetings were canceled without explanation. HICPAC member Dr. David Weber called the move "disappointing and concerning."
"There is no other federal panel that can do this work," he continued. Weber, the president of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), emphasizing that CDC-backed guidelines carry more weight than those from individual medical societies.
SHEA and the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology likewise expressed disappointment in a joint statement. The two organizations warned that eliminating HICPAC "creates a preventable gap in national preparedness," particularly as antibiotic-resistant infections and emerging diseases pose growing threats.
From federal control to health freedom: How HICPAC's end shifts power to hospitals
Prior to its dissolution, the HICPAC was in the final stages of updating airborne pathogen guidelines – which have not been revised since 2007. The guidelines sought to incorporate lessons from the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Infectious disease specialist Dr. Anurag Malani noted that the draft included contentious changes, such as allowing surgical masks instead of N95 respirators in some cases.
While the CDC maintains it remains committed to infection prevention, experts fear the absence of HICPAC’s structured input will lead to inconsistent standards across states. "You’d want to avoid seeing state and local health departments try to figure this out on their own," Malani said.
With archived webpages and stalled updates, the committee’s decades of work – 540 recommendations, with 90 percent adopted by the CDC – now risk becoming outdated. As healthcare systems grapple with post-pandemic challenges, the loss of HICPAC underscores a broader tension between federal streamlining and public health readiness.
However, one door opens when another closes. With the HICPAC disbanded, individual hospitals are now free to follow their own protocols and adjust them as they see fit instead of following a top-down approach. This lines up with the health freedom agenda prompted by the HHS, the CDC's parent agency, under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s leadership.
Watch this news report about representatives of the Department of Government Efficiency paying a visit to the CDC's headquarters.
https://www.brighteon.com/9e18aa81-0eff-44b2-8391-8244b9495817
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia