16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Ron Bouchard, a constitutional law strategist, emphasized the broader implications of the case. "This is a blatant violation of fundamental rights on multiple levels," Bouchard said. "By what authority has this family been apprehended and for what? A family has the right to travel with their children. How and why have they been reported missing, and by whom? What laws have they broken, and what imminent danger exists to justify the drastic action of DCF and the Fitchburg Police Department?"
The pediatrician's office, DCF, and the Fitchburg Police Department have declined to comment, further fueling suspicions of a cover-up. Advocates and legal experts are calling for a thorough investigation into the actions of the pediatrician and the agencies involved.
A call to action
As the case continues to unfold, the Rivera-Encarnacion family remains in a state of limbo. Rivera is being held in Worcester County Jail on a $200,000 bond, while Encarnacion is incarcerated in Chicopee. The children have been placed with family members in Massachusetts, but the trauma of the experience has left deep scars.
"This case is a wake-up call for all parents," said Ann Vandersteel, an activist supporting the family. "We must stand together to protect our rights and prevent government agencies from weaponizing medical mandates against families."
The family's plight has also drawn attention to the need for legislative reform. "Doctors should not have the power to report parents to DCF based on personal beliefs," said Texas Republican congressional candidate Ava Zolari. "This is a clear case of government overreach and a violation of constitutional rights." Congress should act on this issue, making it illegal and punishable for doctors to retaliate against parents who decline childhood vaccinations.
As the nation watches, the Rivera-Encarnacion family's story serves as a stark reminder of the importance of parental authority and the dangers of a medical-police state. The fight for their rights and the safety of their children continues, and the outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for families across the country.
The Fitchburg Police Department (978) 345-4355 are responsible for escalating this further. This must stop. There is no evidence of abuse or neglect on part of the parents. The abuse and neglect stems from the false authorities - the pediatrician, the compliant police department, the out of control DCF and CPS, who think they can harass, separate, punish, terrorize, and extort this family.
This Rivera-Encarnacion family should immediately be released and reunited, and charges should be pursued against all false authorities acting unlawfully against them!
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A crossroads for tax equity
The FTF’s analysis arrives as nations and businesses grapple with an interconnected tax system riddled with loopholes. With tech firms amassing unparalleled wealth and power, calls to reclaim lost tax revenue are mounting. The OECD’s proposed 15% global minimum tax, still unratified in major economies, and U.S. reforms like closing the FDII break could redefine the landscape.
As FTF concludes, the “Silicon Six” tax gap isn’t just a financial loss — it’s a democratic deficit. As lawmakers face pressure to act, the question remains: Can corporations’ moral obligations align with their complex financial structures, or will taxpayers foot the bill? The world watches, demanding accountability.
“This isn’t about greed — it’s about systemic failure,” Monaghan said. Until governments close the door on profit-shifting, the era of Big Tech’s tax free-pass may continue.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Minnesota joins 10 other states in push to ban mRNA-based vaccines
Lawmakers in Minnesota introduced legislation on April 7 to ban the use of mRNA-based vaccines there, making the North Star State the 11th state to implement such a prohibition.
HF 3152 states that “no person shall provide or administer a gene-based vaccine to another person in this state." The bill defines mRNA vaccines as those developed using messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology, modified mRNA technology, self-amplifying mRNA technology or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) technology. Violators would face a $500 fine per offense and potential disciplinary action by the relevant state medical licensing bod
If passed, the bill would have far-reaching implications for healthcare providers and public health initiatives in the state. However, its prospects are uncertain in the Minnesota Legislature – with a Democratic-controlled state Senate and an evenly-divided House. Gov. Tim Walz, a far-left Democrat, is also unlikely to sign it into law.
But Minnesota isn't alone in this endeavor, however. Lawmakers in Idaho, Iowa and Montana have introduced similar legislation since the start of 2025.
McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher pointed out that while none of these bills have become law yet, they represent a significant shift in the political landscape. These proposals reflect growing skepticism and concerns about the safety and long-term effects of mRNA vaccines, which were rapidly developed and deployed during the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
Growing push to ban dangerous mRNA vaccines
The push to ban mRNA-based vaccines in various U.S. states is rooted in a series of reported adverse reactions and safety concerns. The federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has documented thousands of deaths, hospitalizations, heart attacks and cases of cardiac inflammation following mRNA vaccinations. Even researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have acknowledged a high verification rate of myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation) reports in VAERS, suggesting that under-reporting is more likely than over-reporting.
Iowa State Sen. Doug Campbell (R-District 30) who introduced a similar bill, argued that vaccine manufacturers should be held accountable for any adverse reactions. "If I was a manufacturer of car tires and they [delaminated] at 1,000 miles, I should be liable for that," he said. Campbell's proposal initially sought an outright ban, but was later modified to require mRNA vaccine manufacturers to waive liability protections.
Public health experts meanwhile denounced efforts to ban these injections at the state level. William Schaffner, a professor of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University, expressed disappointment and distress at the legislation.
He emphasized that state lawmakers lack the necessary knowledge and background to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. "It's as though state legislatures wish to take over a function of the Food and Drug Administration and they're simply not in a position to do that," Schaffner remarked.
Despite criticism, the introduction of HF 3152 in Minnesota is part of a broader trend of legislative actions aimed at regulating mRNA-based vaccines. The outcome of these legislative efforts will have far-reaching implications for healthcare, public health and medical research.
Watch Dr. Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD and Del Bigtree touching on the risks of mRNA vaccines in this interview on "The HighWire."
https://www.brighteon.com/5899eec4-0c90-4cd3-a8b9-20f16c8d10fe
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Transhuman vectors of disease: Young adults continue to produce spike proteins ONE YEAR after receiving COVID vaccine
In a groundbreaking peer-reviewed study published last week in Immunity, Inflammation and Disease, researchers have uncovered alarming evidence that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, specifically the Pfizer vaccine, can cause the body to continue producing the spike protein for a year or more after vaccination. This revelation adds to the growing body of scientific evidence suggesting that the long-term impacts of these vaccines are far more severe and complex than initially anticipated.
The study, which examined 84 young adults, found that participants exhibited elevated levels of multiple proinflammatory cytokines, indicating a persistent immune response to the mRNA vaccines. According to the researchers, the "persistent production of spike protein and highly inflammatory nature of mRNA-lipid nanoparticles" may be responsible for the elevated cytokine levels. This finding is particularly concerning, as it suggests that the body's immune system remains in a state of chronic activation, potentially leading to a host of health issues.
The long-term implications of persistent spike protein production
Daniel O’Connor, founder and CEO of TrialSite News, emphasized the significance of the study's findings: "This study raises important questions about the long-term immunological imprinting of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in healthy young adults." O’Connor called for urgent spike protein clearance and biodistribution studies, especially in young males and older adults, whose immune responses appear to be disproportionately affected.
Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., a senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), noted that while the study's design has limitations, it presents "evidence with strong implications." He warned that months- or even years-long production of spike protein could lead to T-cell exhaustion, a condition where the body's immune system becomes unable to effectively fight viruses or cancer. "Persistent exposure to antigens will exhaust the T-cells and inhibit their natural function," Jablonowski said.
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher pointed out that the study's findings are not entirely unexpected, given the 130 peer-reviewed studies that have already identified the persistent presence of spike protein in the human body. Hulscher suggested that long-term exposure to spike proteins may result in symptoms similar to those experienced by people diagnosed with long COVID, further complicating the health landscape.
The study's findings also raise broader safety concerns, according to Jablonowski. He called for a larger retrospective controlled study, emphasizing the urgency of preserving vaccine injury data: "This kind of data is not kept forever. The window to preserve information on the harms of the COVID-19 injections is quickly closing."
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently criticized HHS sub-agencies for selling patient information, including vaccine injury data, to each other instead of making it freely accessible. Kennedy announced the launch of a new agency within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that will specialize in vaccine injuries, a move that could potentially increase transparency and accountability.
The impact on cytokine levels and immune dysregulation
The study also revealed a "significant increase" in cytokines associated with chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and autoimmune activation. These cytokines, including TNF-?, IL-1?, IL-6, IL-4, IL-7, and IL-17E, were found in elevated levels among study participants, with males showing particularly significant increases.
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for CHD, noted that the increase in cytokines could be influenced by the observed increase in weight and body mass index (BMI) among participants. However, he emphasized that even the increases in older adults are concerning and warrant further investigation.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
🚨URGENT NOTICE🚨
“THINK BIG, this is how I got MITOLYN!”
Rosseane Barr shared her secret!
Trump was her biggest support and motivation trough the process!
Rosseane announced that the sale of this magical product is ending TODAY and will only resume once all clients show their great results!
Trust her words and watch your results coming immediately!
MITOLYN will help you to lose weight but also keep you healthy with strong immune system!
MITOLYN will regenerate your damaged liver!
MITOLYN will save you from potential heart issues!
You will be full of energy!
This is the product that can change your life in a 6 months. Are you ready for a change?
This is the BEST SELLING product in America's history!
All records were smashed,
more than 7,000,000 products sold in such a short period.🙏
🚨This is your LAST CHANCE to get
80% off if your order now.🚨
📌 https://rebrand.ly/MitolynOfficial2025
📌 https://rebrand.ly/MitolynOfficial2025
Warp Speed 2.0: Trump Administration ACCELERATES Gates-funded, self-amplifying bird flu vaccines
The Trump administration has once again thrown its weight behind controversial vaccine technologies, this time by granting Fast Track designation to ARCT-2304, a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine for H5N1 avian influenza. Developed by Arcturus Therapeutics, this vaccine is part of a broader strategy to prepare for future pandemics, but it also rekindles the contentious legacy of Operation Warp Speed. The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), which played a central role in the rapid development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, is once again at the helm, raising serious questions about the safety and efficacy of these experimental technologies.
Key points:
• The Trump administration has granted Fast Track designation to ARCT-2304, a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine for H5N1 avian influenza.
• BARDA, a key player in Operation Warp Speed, is funding and accelerating the development of this next-generation vaccine technology.
• The vaccine, developed by Arcturus Therapeutics, uses self-replicating mRNA that amplifies immune response within the body's cells.
• The FDA's Fast Track designation aims to expedite the review process, raising concerns about the rapid deployment of experimental technologies.
• The Gates Foundation has committed $782,543 to support the project, further entrenching the public-private partnership model.
• This fast track explains why Gates and Trump met and had a good three hour meeting after Trump was elected in 2024.
A history of hasty vaccine development
Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration's flagship initiative during the early stages of the COVID-19 scandal, was lauded for its speed but criticized for its lack of transparency and the potential risks it posed to public health. The rapid development and emergency authorization of mRNA vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, while credited with saving lives, also caused significant side effects and the long-term impacts of these novel technologies. The ARCT-2304 vaccine, which uses self-replicating mRNA, is the latest in a series of fast-tracked projects that continue to push the boundaries of what is considered safe and ethical in vaccine development.
The dangers of self-amplifying mRNA technology
Self-amplifying mRNA vaccines, like ARCT-2304, are designed to replicate within the body's cells, potentially triggering a stronger immune response at lower doses. While this may sound promising, the technology remains largely experimental, and the long-term effects are not yet fully understood. The rapid replication of mRNA within cells could lead to unintended consequences, such as overstimulation of the immune system, which might result in severe adverse reactions. Moreover, the use of self-replicating RNA raises concerns about genetic modification and the potential for unintended genetic changes in the host.
The role of BARDA and the Gates Foundation
BARDA's involvement in the ARCT-2304 project is particularly troubling, given its history with Operation Warp Speed. The agency's expansive authority to fund, coordinate, and fast-track pandemic-related therapeutics and vaccines has been criticized for prioritizing speed over safety. The Gates Foundation's commitment of $782,543 to support the project further entrenches the public-private partnership model, which has been a source of controversy due to the potential for conflicts of interest and lack of accountability.
The Trump administration's continued support for these experimental technologies, despite the known risks and failures of Operation Warp Speed, is deeply concerning. The Fast Track designation for ARCT-2304 is a clear indication that the administration is more interested in rapid deployment than in ensuring the safety and efficacy of these vaccines. This approach not only puts public health at risk but also undermines trust in the regulatory process.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Father speaks out: Challenging the mainstream narrative of his daughter’s “unvaccinated measles death”
In a poignant and controversial interview, Peter Hildebrand, the father of eight-year-old Daisy, who was pronounced an "unvaccinated measles death" by the mainstream media, has come forward to challenge the official narrative. Hildebrand, along with his wife, firmly believes that Daisy did not die from measles, but rather from a lack of proper medical care. This case has reignited debates about the reliability of media reports and the treatment of patients in hospitals, especially those with alternative health beliefs.
The interview, conducted by Polly Tommey of Children’s Health Defense, delves into the discrepancies between the media's portrayal and the family's account. Hildebrand's emotional testimony highlights the pain and anger he feels, not only over the loss of his daughter but also over the media's persistent misrepresentation of her death.
The family's story vs. the media's narrative
Peter Hildebrand is clear and resolute in his belief that Daisy did not die from measles. "No, absolutely not," he stated when asked if he and his wife believe Daisy's death was due to the disease. The family's stance is supported by medical records that contradict the media's claims. Hildebrand's frustration is palpable when he discusses the widespread reporting of Daisy's death as a measles case. "That hurts. It hurts very much. And that's exactly why I'm doing this interview. So hopefully people can understand that she did not die from measles," he said.
Hildebrand's criticism extends to the hospital where Daisy was treated. He believes that the medical staff failed to provide the necessary care, particularly the budesonide breathing treatment that he and his family had requested. "They didn’t give her the budesonide breathing treatment that we’d been asking for. They were saying that the IV steroids they were giving her were better," Hildebrand explained. This omission, he argues, contributed to Daisy's deteriorating condition.
The role of alternative health advocates
The Hildebrand family sought advice from alternative health practitioners, including Dr. Ben Edwards and Dr. Richard Bartlett, who are known for their critical views on conventional medicine and the MMR vaccine. Hildebrand mentioned that Daisy was given vitamin A, which seemed to help initially. However, as her condition worsened, the family felt compelled to seek further medical assistance at a hospital.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent critic of the pharmaceutical industry and advocate for vaccine safety, attended Daisy's funeral and a subsequent meeting with the family. Kennedy, who has praised Edwards and Bartlett as "extraordinary healers," has been a vocal supporter of the family's stance. His presence at the funeral and the meeting underscores the broader debate about the safety and efficacy of conventional medical treatments versus alternative approaches.
The broader implications
The case of Daisy Hildebrand raises important questions about the reliability of media reporting, the standard of care in hospitals, and the role of alternative health practices. Hospitals have standards of care for treating children who present with breathing difficulties. If the hospital in question did not follow best practices for treating Daisy, the records should be obtained and a medical malpractice suit should ensue. Hildebrand's call for accountability in the medical system is echoed by many who feel that the current healthcare model often fails to prioritize patient well-being over profit.
Hildebrand's message to other parents is clear: "It [doesn't] matter whether the hospital takes your insurance or not, just make sure you go to a hospital that takes care of the people. Because when they don't take care of the people, they just end up dying, just like in Lubbock, Texas." This warning is a stark reminder of the importance of patient advocacy and the need for transparency in medical care.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Children’s Health Defense stands firm: Based on SCIENCE and personal experiences, the MMR vaccine is NEITHER SAFE nor EFFECTIVE
Vaccine violence is real. It’s an existential threat to society and mankind and has been for over a century. Vaccination is a biomedical terrorism vector that has been fully exploited by Western Medicine under the guise of protection from infectious diseases. The most dangerous vaccines are the ones that contain multiple virus strains, mercury, and cell-changing technology (mRNA). These kinds of vaccines send the immune system and the central nervous system into a state of shock that often results in long-term or permanent health injury (or death).
The measles/mumps/rubella vaccine may be the most dangerous jab ever, not counting the plandemic genocidal mRNA stabs
No person on planet earth should ever be forced, by government, threat of losing job, or by coercion, to be injected with a vaccine, of any kind. This is similar to being forced to be surgically operated on without consent. It’s basically invasive surgery with a needle instead of a scalpel, and the ingredients in vaccinations is enough to put the scientists who design and manufacture them in prison for conspiracy to commit murder.
Children who develop autism from vaccines may never lead a normal life again, needing constant adult assistance and supervision, and incapable of working any full-time job that requires multi-tasking, long-term focus, or social interactions/public relations of any kind. This is a tragedy. Even head scientists from the CDC, like Dr. William Thompson, have blown the whistle on the MMR vaccine causing severe disabilities in children, especially boys under 3 years of age.
During a high-stakes Cabinet meeting, HHS Secretary RFK Jr. announced that the U.S. government, under President Trump’s directive, will identify the root cause of America’s surge in autism cases by September through a global research initiative. Trump, calling the rise in autism (now 1 in 31 children compared to historic rates of 1 in 10,000) a "tragedy," suggested environmental or medical factors—possibly vaccines—may be responsible.
RFK Jr. vowed to uncover the truth, promising a definitive answer by the fall, prompting Trump to predict it would be the "biggest news conference ever." The statement reflects the Trump administration’s push for transparency, challenging Big Pharma and mainstream narratives that have dismissed vaccine-autism concerns as conspiracies.
This marks a major shift toward parental concerns and health accountability, prioritizing children’s safety over corporate interests. In a search for the causes of autism, it is highly likely the research team will find out that a lack of good gut bacteria, called flora, is a main concern, and that many vaccines DESTROY this sensitive but vital gut microbiome.
Also, it is very likely the research team will discover that any major shock to the immune system, coupled with deadly toxins like heavy metal poisons, genetically modified bacteria, multiple virus strains, formaldehyde, aluminum, and human abortion cells, is a MAJOR CAUSE of autism spectrum disorder, and probably Asperger’s syndrome, ADD, ADHD, and severe allergies to foods that coincide with the vaccine ingredients.
Ever wonder why so many American children are deathly allergic to peanuts? Look no further than peanut oil residuals found in several childhood vaccinations. Ever think about why the autism rates skyrocketed from 1 in 10,000 kids to 1 in 50 just since 1990? Check the CDC-recommended (enforced by coercion) childhood schedule of vaccinations that went from about 8 vaccines to over 70 before age 7.
https://x.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1910386388148871559
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Sen. Johnson @SenRonJohnsonUS demands COVID vaccine makers hand over all documents, communications, as evidence against their products reaches a climax
The investigation heating up: Sen. Johnson’s non-compliance letter drops bombshell
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), a persistent critic of vaccine mandates and federal transparency lapses, has thrust Big Pharma and tech giants into another controversy. In a Tuesday letter, the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations chairman demanded Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and BioNTech submit records dating to January 2020, including communications with federal agencies and Big Tech platforms about vaccine safety. The move amplifies concerns that manufacturers colluded with social media companies like Meta and Alphabet to suppress reports of adverse events such as myocarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Johnson warned companies not to follow the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) playbook of hiding data. “Any attempt to obstruct or delay will result in compulsory process,” he declared, citing HHS’ 2023 refusal to unredact vaccine safety documents.
The timing couldn’t be more urgent. Last year, VAERS data showed mRNA vaccines caused 45 times more deaths than all flu vaccines combined since 1990. Yet Pfizer’s next booster — approved without new clinical trials — is already months overdue for FDA review. Meanwhile, the Biden administration sidelined ethical considerations in favor of political expediency, fast-tracking jabs through EUAs and hiding liability under the mechanism of "national emergency."
Collusion, Cover-ups, and the crisis no one wants to name
Johnson’s probe aligns with a scathing petition filed by scientists from Australia to the U.S., claiming mRNA vaccines are genetically contaminated and improperly classified to evade scrutiny. The petition, backed by immunologists and legal experts, alleges Pfizer and Moderna’s shots were laced with cancer-linked DNA plasmids—a revelation ignored by regulators until now.
“The FDA’s misclassification of mRNA jabs as vaccines, not gene therapies, allowed suppression of informed consent,” explained attorney Julian J. Gillespie. His petition cites peer-reviewed studies showing plasmid DNA in vials, blood samples, and organs — all with SV40 sequences linked to DNA mutations and tumor formation.
This contamination claim dovetails with Johnson’s focus on pharma-Big Tech collaboration. Emails obtained by The Federalist detail how HHS and social media giants like Twitter used algorithms to "fact-check" and suppress vaccine carnage reports. Even the Florida Surgeon General, Joseph Ladapo, has documented soaring myocarditis cases post-vaccine.
Jab manufacturers sought profit and power, refuse to admit to wrongdoing
Johnson’s fight isn’t just about paperwork — it’s about accountability for what many are calling “the worst vaccine safety failure in history.” During the vaccine's rollout and subsequent fallout, Johnson gave a formal platform to individuals injured by the jab, and allowed parents to tell the story of how they lost their child to the so-called vaccine.
The numbers tell a grim story: Over 2 million VAERS reports of adverse events, including thousands of deaths, and a petition signed by immunologists demanding a recall. Yet the FDA still green-lit boosters based on “existing trial data” from rushed, abbreviated studies. Johnson’s subpoena and the scientists’ petition paint a grim picture of a system that prioritizes power over people. The parallels to Soviet-era science — where dissent was silenced to prop up rulers — are haunting.
Dr. Joel Wallskog, a vaccine-injured orthopedic surgeon, summed it up: “If these companies knew the risks, they’re liable for mass harm. If they didn’t — then we’re dealing with reckless incompetence, not science.”
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Pfizer’s RSV vaccine linked to preterm births as drug giant CONCEALED RISKS from pregnant women in unethical clinical trials
"Trust the science" is the mantra repeated to pregnant women, but Pfizer's deliberate omission of preterm birth risks in RSV trials shows Big Pharma values profits over ethics.
Key findings from BMJ Open study:
• Pregnant women who received Pfizer's RSV vaccine (Abrysvo) faced higher rates of preterm births, with most occurring within a week of injection.
• GSK previously halted its identical RSV vaccine trial due to preterm birth risks—information Pfizer intentionally withheld from participants.
• FDA approved Pfizer’s shot despite internal objections, exposing women and infants to potential harm.
• Post-marketing surveillance confirms what trial data suggested: this vaccine disrupts fetal development and threatens maternal health.
The unethical concealment of preterm birth risks
For decades, pregnant women have been warned against consuming caffeine, alcohol, sushi, and even certain herbal teas—yet Pfizer injected them with an experimental biologic without disclosing known dangers. How did we get here?
When GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) discovered in 2022 that its RSV vaccine was causing preterm births—1 in 54 vaccinated mothers delivered early—it suspended trials. Pfizer, aware of this red flag, plowed ahead with its own RSV trials, never informing pregnant participants of the risk.
"Any failure to provide new and potentially important safety information to trial participants is ethically problematic," said Dr. Charles Weijer, a bioethicist who condemned Pfizer’s actions. Yet this omission wasn’t an oversight—it was policy.
Pfizer’s consent forms falsely claimed the vaccine was "risk-free for the baby," a deception experts call "misleading and irresponsible." Worse, researchers found over 80 investigators across 18 countries failed to warn pregnant women of the dangers.
VAERS found preterm ruptured membranes and hemorrhages
This study provides the first post-approval safety assessment of Pfizer's respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine in pregnant individuals using data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from September 2023 to February 2024. Among 77 reported adverse events (AEs), 54.55% were classified as serious, with preterm birth being the most prevalent pregnancy-related complication (12.8%). Other pregnancy-associated AEs included preterm rupture of membranes, cesarean sections, cervical dilation, and hemorrhages (each ?3.3%). Non-pregnancy-related side effects included headache and injection site reactions.
A disproportionality analysis identified a statistically significant signal for preterm birth, suggesting it was reported more frequently than expected. Most preterm births occurred between 32 and 37 weeks of gestation, with a median onset of three days post-vaccination (two-thirds occurring within a week). While the safety profile generally matched prelicensure trial findings, the study underscores the need for further investigation into the observed preterm birth signal. The authors recommend active surveillance to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes, emphasizing the importance of robust post-marketing monitoring to inform clinical guidelines on RSV vaccination during pregnancy.
Science confirms what Pfizer denied: RSV shots trigger early labor
The new peer-reviewed analysis in BMJ Open examined VAERS reports and found:
• Most preterm births occurred within 3 days of vaccination.
• No co-administration with other vaccines (ruling out confounding factors).
• Statistical safety signals strongly linked the shot to premature rupture of membranes and preterm labor.
The FDA ignored these risks, approving Abrysvo in 2023 despite 4 advisory members voting "no." Their compromise? A narrow 32-36 week window for vaccination—a flimsy attempt to dodge liability for the most dangerous preterm births (before 32 weeks).
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Suppressed report reveals U.S. troops had COVID-19 symptoms in Wuhan months before pandemic began
In a significant development that has reignited debates over the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, a suppressed military report has confirmed that seven U.S. service members exhibited COVID-19-like symptoms during the 2019 World Military Games in Wuhan, China, months before the official start of the pandemic. The report, which the Biden administration withheld from public release for over two years, was finally made public in March 2025, raising questions about the transparency and timing of the information.
The suppressed report and its contents
The two-page military report, finalized in December 2022, detailed that seven American military personnel experienced symptoms consistent with COVID-19 during or shortly after the October 2019 World Military Games in Wuhan. These findings directly contradict earlier statements by the Biden administration, which, through Defense Department spokesman John Kirby, had claimed in 2021 that no such illnesses had occurred.
The report was quietly transmitted to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees in 2022, as required by the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act. However, it did not appear on a government website until late March 2025, when the Trump administration uploaded it to a Defense Department database. The Pentagon has not disclosed when it first became aware of the soldiers' illnesses and declined to comment on the report's contents.
Historical context and implications
The 2019 World Military Games, often referred to as the "military Olympics," brought together nearly 10,000 athletes from over 100 countries to Wuhan, a city that would later become the epicenter of the global pandemic. The presence of multiple athletes from various countries reporting similar symptoms has intensified scrutiny of the timeline and origin of the virus's initial spread.
Chinese officials have long maintained that the first patient with COVID-19 became sick on December 1, 2019. However, credible sources and anecdotal evidence suggest a much earlier exposure, particularly during the October 2019 World Military Games. For instance, athletes from Germany, France, Italy and Luxembourg reported falling ill with symptoms consistent with COVID-19, and some described Wuhan as a "ghost town" with empty streets and heightened health precautions.
Expert reactions and congressional demands
Rutgers University professor Richard Ebright, a vocal advocate for the lab-leak theory, stated that the withheld report strengthens existing evidence that COVID-19 was circulating in Wuhan in October-November 2019. "This new information strengthens U.S. and allied intelligence data indicating that COVID-19 was circulating in Wuhan in October-November 2019," Ebright told the Washington Free Beacon. He criticized the Biden administration and Congress for keeping the report from the public, calling it "an outrage."
Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) also condemned the concealment, stating, "Taxpayers deserve to know the truth about COVID-19 origins, but the Biden administration concealed this information from the American people for years."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Hospital homicide? Medical records show Texas girl died from a hospital-acquired pneumonia superbug — NOT measles
In a recent development that has sparked intense debate, the death of 8-year-old Daisy Hildebrand in West Texas has brought the issue of measles and its treatment into the spotlight. The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) initially reported that Daisy died from "measles pulmonary failure." However, a detailed analysis of her medical records by leading medical experts suggests that her death was more likely due to hospital-acquired pneumonia, a condition that was exacerbated by a series of medical errors.
The case of Daisy Hildebrand
Daisy Hildebrand was admitted to University Medical Center (UMC) Children’s Hospital in Lubbock, Texas, on March 21, with community-acquired pneumonia, a urinary tract infection and dehydration. She tested positive for measles on March 24 and was treated with antibiotics and oxygen. After showing signs of improvement, she was discharged on March 24. However, her condition deteriorated, and she was readmitted to UMC on March 27 with a high fever, cough and shortness of breath.
Dr. Pierre Kory, a pulmonologist and critical care specialist, reviewed Daisy’s medical records and concluded that her death was due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to hospital-acquired pneumonia. Kory noted that the causative organism was a highly antibiotic-resistant E. coli, which she likely contracted during her first ICU stay.
Medical errors and treatment failures
Kory highlighted several critical errors in Daisy’s treatment that may have contributed to her death:
1 Lack of antibiotics: Despite her worsening condition, antibiotics were stopped early in her second hospital stay. Kory stated, "The admitting doctor’s diagnosis was ‘pneumonitis,’ and antibiotics were quickly stopped after admission."
2 High-dose steroids without anti-infectives: The hospital staff administered high-dose steroids without pairing them with appropriate anti-infectives, which Kory described as a "lousy idea."
3 Delayed sputum culture: A sputum culture, which could have identified the specific bacteria causing her pneumonia, was not performed until days into her second stay. By the time the results came back, it was too late to change her treatment effectively.
4 Incorrect antibiotic choice: On day seven of her second stay, the hospital staff broadened the antibiotic treatment to include ceftazidime. However, the E. coli causing her pneumonia was resistant to this antibiotic. Kory noted that the correct antibiotic, imipenem, was not administered.
Historical context and public health implications
The case of Daisy Hildebrand raises important questions about the treatment of measles and the broader implications for public health. Measles, once a common childhood illness, has been largely controlled in the U.S. through vaccination. However, the effectiveness and safety of the measles vaccine have been subjects of ongoing debate.
Measles mortality rates:
• Pre-vaccine era: Measles mortality rates had already declined significantly by the time the first measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. According to the CDC, the death rate from measles dropped by 98% from 1900 to 1955, largely due to improved sanitation and nutrition.
• Post-vaccine era: While the measles vaccine has further reduced the number of reported cases, concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy persist. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has recorded 144 deaths following MMR or MMRV vaccination between 2000 and 2024, compared to nine measles-related deaths reported to the CDC during the same period.
Vaccine safety and efficacy:
• Waning immunity: Research shows that immunity from the measles vaccine wanes over time, with about 60% of vaccinated children susceptible to subclinical measles infection and 33% of adults susceptible to clinical infection by age 24-26.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
The media playbook for measles looks a lot like its COVID playbook — this time, kids are the pawns
There are moments in the history of a movement that test its resolve. For the medical freedom movement, this is one of those moments.
We are in the midst of another full-on attack by the pharmaceutical-industrial complex, aided and abetted by a beholden mainstream media united around its allegiance to a $69 billion vaccine industry.
Five years ago, we fought back as our government, Big Media and Big Pharma orchestrated and executed a COVID-19 fear campaign — a campaign built on lies, deception and censorship — and then parlayed the public’s fear into dangerous and deadly medical mandates and hospital protocols that continue to cause profound harm.
The upside to COVID-19 global disaster?
It opened the eyes of millions more people to the dangers of shoddily tested vaccines, regulatory agency hubris and one-size-fits-all “medicine.”
As our movement has grown exponentially, so has our threat to Big Pharma.
In response, we’re seeing the same tactics rolled out again. This time, it’s measles. This time, children are the pawns in pharma’s playbook.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) stood strong and stayed true to our mission during COVID. We’re standing just as strong now. We remain just as committed now to the truth, informed consent and medical freedom as we were during the pandemic.
As pharma ramps up its measles playbook, our No. 1 job is to dismantle the vaccine industry’s lies — broadcast far and wide through the industry’s most reliable and faithful megaphone: mainstream media.
The media would have you believe that measles is a “deadly” disease. But any suggestion that MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccines are safer than measles infection isn’t supported by facts.
In fact, between 2000 and 2024, nine measles-related deaths were reported to the CDC. During the same period, 141 deaths following MMR or MMRV vaccination were reported in the U.S. to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — suggesting the MMR vaccine can be deadlier than measles.
The media echo the same familiar refrain: The MMR vaccine is “overwhelmingly safe.”
In fact, the MMR vaccine is associated with serious health risks. The package insert for Merck’s MMRII says, “M-M-R II vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.”
Research also shows the MMR vaccine causes febrile seizures, anaphylaxis, meningitis, encephalitis, thrombocytopenia, arthralgia and vasculitis. In 2004, researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that boys vaccinated with their first MMR vaccine on time were 67% more likely to be diagnosed with autism compared to boys who got their first vaccine after their 3rd birthday.
The media insist there’s no viable treatment for measles — hence prevention, with the MMR vaccine, is the sole solution.
In fact, as CHD reported, doctors in West Texas are successfully treating measles with budesonide and vitamin A. Even the World Health Organization recommends vitamin A.
Yet some hospitals and doctors are refusing to treat measles patients with budesonide. Texas health officials rejected pleas by a treating physician to endorse the treatment and get the word out to hospitals about its effectiveness.
Sound familiar?
We saw this identical playbook with COVID. Media parroted public health officials’ claim that the vaccine alone would save us — while discouraging, ridiculing and even outright sanctioning the use of ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, budesonide and other treatments known to reduce COVID severity and death.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
CIA Official Terry Adirim TERMINATED for her role in pushing unlawful vaccine mandates on the military
The legal battle against unlawful orders
In a significant legal victory for military personnel who were subjugated by unlawful vaccine mandates, a federal judge has blocked the Pentagon from punishing unvaccinated Navy SEALs and other Special Forces members, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle against coercive vaccine mandates. This decision not only highlights the ethical and legal complexities surrounding such mandates but also underscores the importance of protecting individual freedoms and constitutional rights, especially within the military, an institution that prides itself on defending those very principles. One of the key architects behind the unlawful vaccine mandate - CIA Official Terry Adirim - has also been TERMINATED for her role in the scandal.
The court's ruling is a testament to the resilience of service members who stood firm in their beliefs and the legal system's capacity to correct overreach. The mandate, which was implemented by then-Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and fully supported by the Biden administration, forced service members to choose between receiving a vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) or facing dismissal. This mandate was not only ethically questionable but also legally dubious, as it bypassed the necessary presidential waiver required under 10 U.S.C. Section 1107(a).
Terry Adirim, a key figure in the enforcement of the mandate, issued a memo in September 2021 directing Department of Defense healthcare providers to treat the EUA Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine as interchangeable with the FDA-approved Comirnaty version. This directive was met with skepticism and legal challenges, as it appeared to circumvent the legal requirements and potentially violate the rights of service members. Adirim's memo was considered legally dubious even within the Pentagon, and her recent firing from the CIA is a clear indication that her actions are being scrutinized and held accountable.
The human cost of coercive mandates
The impact of these mandates on the military community has been profound. Over 8,700 service members were forced out of the military, and tens of thousands more are estimated to have left under duress, harassment, and discrimination. Others stayed in their positions quietly, not conceding, but facing retaliatory measures every step of the way. These numbers are not just statistics; they represent the lives and careers of dedicated individuals who were willing to serve their country but were unwilling to compromise their health or personal beliefs. The loss of these skilled and courageous service members has weakened the military's operational readiness and morale.
The Trump administration's efforts to reverse the damage caused by the Biden administration's mandate are a step in the right direction. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to reinstate service members who were kicked out, along with backpay and their same rank. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth followed up with a directive to the services to implement the executive order, and the Pentagon has begun outreach to those affected. This move is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic necessity to rebuild the military's strength and cohesion.
The broader implications for individual liberty
The legal and ethical issues surrounding the vaccine mandates extend beyond the military. They raise fundamental questions about the balance between public health and individual liberty, the role of government in personal medical decisions, and the accountability of public officials. The firing of Terry Adirim and the court's decision to block the Pentagon's punitive actions are important steps toward restoring trust in institutions and protecting the rights of individuals.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
DEADLY FLU JAB WARNING: New flu vaccines make recipients 27 PERCENT MORE LIKELY to catch the flu
1 Negative Vaccine Effectiveness: The 2024-2025 flu vaccine showed a -26.9% effectiveness rate, meaning vaccinated individuals had a 27% higher risk of contracting the flu compared to unvaccinated individuals. This suggests the vaccine may have impaired immunity rather than provided protection.
2 Repeated Vaccination Risks: The study builds on prior research showing that annual flu vaccination may reduce effectiveness over time, with some past studies reporting negative efficacy (up to -54%) in multi-year recipients. Immune system interference and strain mismatches were cited as potential causes.
3 Concerns Over Ingredients and Safety: Most participants received vaccines containing thimerosal (a mercury-based preservative linked to neurodevelopmental risks), which researchers speculated might weaken immune responses. Prior studies also associated flu vaccines with Guillain-Barré syndrome and non-flu respiratory infections.
4 Challenge to Public Health Policies: Experts argue the findings contradict mainstream vaccine advocacy, highlighting flaws in mandates, lack of pre-release efficacy testing, and the impracticality of annual reformulations. The study calls for a reevaluation of blanket flu vaccination campaigns, especially given low mortality benefits (particularly in the elderly) and potential net harm.
This is deeply concerning folks. This year’s flu shots literally cause the jabbed sheeple to have a 27 percent higher risk of catching the flu. What kind of warped ‘medicine’ is this? The flu can be deadly, especially for people already suffering from cancer, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, lung disease, high blood pressure, and clot shot syndrome from the spike proteins of the Covid stabs.
A new preprint study of over 53,000 Cleveland Clinic employees suggests that the 2024-2025 influenza vaccine may have increased recipients' risk of contracting the flu by 27%, contradicting long-standing public health recommendations. Published last week on MedRxiv, the research found a negative vaccine effectiveness rate of 26.9%, sparking debate among scientists and medical professionals. Conducted during a season marked by high flu transmission, the study challenges the effectiveness of annual vaccination campaigns—particularly when strain mismatches occur.
The study tracked vaccinated and unvaccinated employees from October 2023 to February 2024, revealing that flu infections rose more rapidly among those who received the shot. “The vaccine has not been effective in preventing influenza this season,” the authors concluded. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher called the findings “deeply concerning,” while Dr. Clayton J. Baker stated the data “strongly suggests the shot was outright harmful.”
Internist Dr. Meryl Nass noted that flu vaccines are not rigorously tested for efficacy before approval, as they rely on historical licensing. “Negative efficacy is possible,” she said, citing minimal pre-release safety evaluations.
Massive contradictions are evident from the Medical Industrial Complex, the Vaccine Industrial Complex, and the Mass Media push for everyone to get flu jabs
Despite the Cleveland Clinic’s vaccine mandate for employees, the unvaccinated cohort—comprising those with medical or religious exemptions—showed lower infection rates. Karl Jablonowski of Children’s Health Defense argued the results expose flaws in mandates: “Those exempt posed less of a threat [to patients] than those who were mandated.”
The study echoes prior research, including a 2012 Clinical Infectious Diseases paper linking flu vaccines to higher rates of non-flu respiratory infections. James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., called the new analysis “one of the most consequential influenza vaccine studies in recent years” due to its scale and independence from industry funding.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Massachusetts pediatrician conscripts law enforcement, unleashes nationwide manhunt for Fitchburg family-of-five who declined vaccinations for their healthy kids
A family's fight for freedom and faith
In a shocking turn of events that has sent ripples of outrage across the nation, a Fitchburg, Massachusetts family is now at the center of a heated debate over parental rights and government overreach. Isael Rivera and Ruth Encarnacion, a homeschooling couple, found themselves in the crosshairs of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) and local law enforcement after they made the informed decision to decline vaccinations for their nine-month-old baby based on their religious beliefs.
The ordeal began in February when the family's pediatrician, a mandatory reporter, threatened to report the parents to DCF if they did not vaccinate their infant. Despite Massachusetts law allowing for religious exemptions to vaccinations, the doctor proceeded to file a 51A child "neglect" report, setting off a chain of events that would terrorize the family and would ultimately lead law enforcement to tear the family apart.
"The doctor said if we didn’t vaccinate, he’d have to report us," Rivera told an advocate who provided safe harbor for the family in Texas. "We were clear that our decision was based on our religious beliefs, and we were confident in our ability to care for our child." Massachusetts statutory law includes religious exemptions for parents, but these exemptions are for school attendance, and this family home-schooled to begin with, so the pediatrician had no justification one way or the other. The pediatrician had no legal grounds to harass this family, not for school attendance, nor for any reason whatsoever. Vaccines are not a mandatory requirement for school or life in general, so the pediatrician is acting unlawfully and against any basic medical standard. He has not only violated basic medical ethics and his oath, but he has violated the parent's fundamental rights in the most egregious and coercive way imaginable.
DCFS and local PD escalate situation, prompting family's exile from Massachusetts
After the disgusting pediatrician conscripted law enforcement to further the harassment and abuse, what followed was a dramatic and terrifying escalation. DCF left a notice on the family’s door demanding a home visit, which the parents refused, citing their rights. Fitchburg police, at the direction of Leominster DCF, surrounded their apartment, banging on doors and circling the property for up to 30 minutes. Encarnacion, fearing for her children's safety, hid in the closet with the five children.
The next day, the situation worsened as police and DCF returned in greater numbers. The family, feeling cornered and fearing for their lives, decided to flee Massachusetts for Texas. They embarked on a three-day journey, aided by a Texas woman who provided them with an RV, food, and supplies.
For a brief moment, the family found refuge in Texas, but their peace was short-lived. A credit card charge for baby formula revealed their location, and on March 8th, authorities tracked them down in Whitney, Texas. Rivera and Encarnacion were arrested and charged with five misdemeanor counts each of "kidnapping a minor by a relative." The children were seized by Child Protective Services (CPS).
National outrage and calls for reform
The case has sparked national outrage, with many questioning the actions of DCF and the Fitchburg Police Department. Kevin Larson, Encarnacion’s attorney, accused DCF of overstepping their bounds. "There was no basis for the neglect report," Larson said. "The doctor’s appointment confirmed that the child was healthy. This is a clear violation of the family’s rights."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Big Tech accused of $278 billion tax underpayment over the past decade
In a landmark report released Monday, the Fair Tax Foundation (FTF) accused six major U.S. tech giants — Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, Netflix, Apple and Microsoft — of paying nearly $278 billion less in U.S. corporate income tax than they would have owed at the 29.7% statutory rate over the past decade. The analysis, covering 2015–2024, reveals the so-called “Silicon Six” paid an average of 18.8% of their profits in taxes, with some companies hiding profits in low-tax jurisdictions and exploiting tax incentives. FTF’s findings expose a system critics say has “hardwired” tax avoidance into corporate DNA, raising calls for a global minimum tax and stricter regulations.
Key findings: Tax rates and aggressive tactics
The FTF study examined 2.5 trillion in combined profits and 11 trillion in revenue generated by the six companies. Their average effective tax rate dropped to 16.1% when excluding one-time repatriation taxes, a financial tool companies use to recover profits held offshore.
A critical method for this disparity is profit-shifting, where multinational firms route profits through countries with lower tax rates. Amazon was singled out for booking a large chunk of its UK income in Luxembourg, a low-tax haven. Netflix had the lowest tax-to-profit ratio at 14.7%, while Microsoft’s 20.4% rate was the highest among the group. Apple (18.4%), Meta (15.4%) and Alphabet (17.9%) also fell below the U.S. average.
The report also highlighted “contingency tax positions” — estimated liabilities unlikely to materialize — boosting companies’ reported tax contributions by $82 billion over the decade. For instance, Amazon’s spokesperson stated its UK operations are fully declared under UK law, adding its investments in infrastructure and low margins naturally reduce tax rates. Meta and Netflix defended their compliance with local rules, but declined to address broader tax strategies.
Historical context: A decade of tax evasion battles
The issue isn’t new. Global responses like the OECD’s 15% Global Minimum Tax proposal in 2021 and the U.S. Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) reforms aimed to curb tax avoidance. However, loopholes persist. For example, the U.S. Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII) tax break allows companies to lower taxes on overseas revenue. The FTF estimates Big Tech has saved $30 billion through FDII in the last three years alone.
The tech sector’s political influence looms large. FTF’s CEO Paul Monaghan noted companies spent millions lobbying governments, citing their sway over policies favoring low-tax environments. This context is amplified as the U.S. and UK negotiate trade deals potentially including tax cuts for U.S. firms, and as tech execs like Bezos and Zuckerberg attended Trump’s second inauguration, signaling industry clout.
Corporate responses: Compliance or “hardwired” avoidance?
While the companies claim adherence to tax laws, the report counters this by framing avoidance as systemic. Amazon defended its approach, stating it “pays all taxes due” while investing over $1.2 trillion in the U.S. and €250 billion in Europe since 2010. Microsoft, Alphabet and Apple declined to comment.
FTF’s Monaghan rejected the “just following the law” argument: “The fact that their tax rates are half the national average shows there’s a system designed to let them do this.” He urged governments to close loopholes and adopt global minimum tax rules.
Critics argue compliance isn’t the issue — public trust is. Researchers pointed to a 2023 Pew poll showing 63% of Americans believe corporations pay “too little” in taxes, a perception fueled by revelations like this report.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Jablonowski compared the impact of mRNA vaccines to that of chemotherapy, a treatment known for its long-term inflammatory effects. He warned that the approval of self-amplifying mRNA vaccines in Japan and the European Union could exacerbate the presence of spike proteins and the associated immune system duress.
COVID jabs have turned a generation of people in to transhuman vectors of disease and perpetual inflammation
COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were designed to genetically alter humans and turn them into biological weapon-producing vectors of disease, whose bodies are constantly in a state of fight or flight and immune system overload, constantly fighting off their own cellular machinery, which has been hijacked to produce toxic spike proteins that cause blood clots, heart inflammation, and a consortium of health woes.
COVID-19 vaccines, still on the market, are still going into kids and young adults, and the threat of these biological weapons spreading through human vectors is now unstoppable, leading to a forever lineage of mutating coronaviruses, that will continue to push people into patterns of sickness and disease.
The latest development, of young adults producing spike proteins one year after they were inoculated, shows how pervasive this disastrous, biological weapon technology really is. The promises of the body neutralizing the spike protein from the vaccine in the deltoid muscles immediately after replication was a total fabricated lie by the government, designed to make the experimental mRNA vaccine seem to be a vaccine technology, priming the immune cells to produce long term B cell immune memory.
However, in the vaccinated, the immune cells are under constant attack because the cells have been permanently altered, no longer producing the proteins needed to sustain life; instead the cells are producing toxic proteins that destroy the body from within. This generation of vaccinated children and young adults will never know what it’s like to be in full health, enjoying life, because their new normal is one of chronic illness and spike protein manufacturing, and a constant barrage of inflammation going on inside them.
A call for action and further research
As the evidence of long-term health impacts continues to mount, a growing number of scientists are calling for the immediate removal of mRNA vaccines from the market. A petition pending before the FDA, signed by several scientists, demands the suspension or withdrawal of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Some U.S. states and communities are also considering bans on these vaccines.
Brian Hooker stated, "Increased inflammation leads to so many different conditions associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, including cardiac sequelae and turbo cancers. This definitely contributes to the body of literature supporting a complete withdrawal of all COVID-19 vaccines on the market."
Nicolas Hulscher echoed this sentiment: "As yet another study reveals grave harms linked to the COVID-19 mRNA injections, the case for their immediate removal from the market grows stronger and more urgent."
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
DMSO and Natural Dyes: A suppressed cancer treatment resurfaces in independent research
Mike Adams of Brighteon Broadcast News and Natural News, has uncovered groundbreaking research on a long-suppressed cancer therapy involving dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and natural dyes like hematoxylin and phycocyanin. Historical studies from Japan and the work of Dr. Eli Jordan Tucker Jr. reveal that this combination selectively targets tumors with minimal side effects—yet was systematically buried by the FDA and the American Cancer Society (ACS).
Adams highlights how phycocyanin, a blue pigment extracted from spirulina, was found in Japanese studies to induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue. Similarly, hematoxylin, derived from logwood, demonstrated potent tumor-killing effects when combined with DMSO—a solvent that penetrates deep into tissues, delivering therapeutic compounds directly to malignant cells.
The FDA’s War on Alternative Cancer Therapies
Dr. Tucker’s research in the 1960s showed remarkable success in treating terminal cancer patients with DMSO-hematoxylin infusions, including cases of fibrosarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. However, the FDA banned DMSO research in 1965, and the ACS dismissed the therapy as "unproven" in 1971—despite documented cures. Adams argues this suppression was deliberate, protecting the lucrative chemotherapy industry.
"The FDA is a terrorist organization that wants people to be sick and die," Adams stated, citing Tucker’s abrupt dismissal from hospitals and the blacklisting of his work. Meanwhile, international studies continued to validate the therapy’s efficacy, particularly for cervical, breast, and prostate cancers—with no relapse cases reported.
Modern Revival: Topical and IV Applications
Today, independent researchers are revisiting these protocols. Adams notes that topical DMSO-hematoxylin mixtures could treat surface tumors (e.g., skin or breast cancers), while IV delivery shows promise for deeper malignancies. Spirulina-derived phycocyanin, now recognized for its anti-angiogenic properties, is also being explored as a complementary agent.
Challenges remain, including limited access to pure compounds and the need for clinical validation. Adams warns against self-experimentation but urges further study: "This is knowledge the cancer industry doesn’t want you to have."
Conclusion
As interest in non-toxic cancer therapies grows, DMSO and natural dyes represent a paradigm shift—one that challenges Big Pharma’s monopoly. For now, the research lives on in the work of independent scientists and the archives of suppressed medicine.
Watch the April 15 episode of "Brighteon Broadcast News" as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about the astonishing true story of DMSO, curative dyes, and phycocyanins.
https://www.brighteon.com/90f1a655-8181-42a5-99f8-bcefdb8b2ddc
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The recent dinner between Bill Gates and President Trump at Mar-a-Lago, where they discussed global health initiatives, further highlights the administration's alignment with private interests. Gates, a long-time advocate for vaccine technologies, has a vested interest in the success of these projects, and his influence on the administration's health policies is evident. The conversation, which lasted about three hours, reportedly focused on the importance of maintaining programs like the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the potential for accelerated medical innovation. However, this alignment with private interests raises questions about the true motivations behind the administration's vaccine agenda.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
As the debate over Daisy Hildebrand's death continues, the broader implications of this case cannot be ignored. The conflict between mainstream medical practices and alternative health approaches, the role of the media in shaping public perception, and the need for accountability in healthcare are all critical issues that demand attention. In the words of Peter Hildebrand, "I’m willing to do any- and everything I can to make sure the hospitals start getting some ‘act right’ in them so nobody else has to go through this." The story of Daisy Hildebrand is a call to action, a plea for change, and a reminder that the truth often lies beyond the sensationalist - vaccine dogma headlines.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
CDC’s vaccine safety chief, Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, accused of record destruction, in desperate attempt to coverup vaccine damage
The vanishing emails: A pattern of evasion
Sen. Ron Johnson’s latest revelations have reignited concerns about systemic deception in federal health agencies. On April 9, Johnson publicly stated that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) could not locate official communications of Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, who leads the CDC’s vaccine safety division.
“Dr. Shimabukuro’s records remain lost and, potentially, removed from HHS’s email system altogether,” Johnson declared, alleging possible violations of the Federal Records Act.
Shimabukuro, a central figure in promoting flu vaccines to pregnant women and overseeing mRNA vaccine safety analyses, has been criticized previously for allegedly misrepresenting vaccine risks. Despite red flags—including a 2022 study he co-authored acknowledging elevated miscarriage risks in pregnant women vaccinated early in their pregnancies—Shimabukuro has consistently defended mass vaccination campaigns. His “lost” records, Johnson argues, now threaten to erase critical evidence of how the public could have been misled. In early 2023, Shimabukuro was captured on video, reporting that the CDC was aware of reports that COVID vaccines cause "debilitating illnesses" and "long term health problems."
Gmail gambits and Dr. Morens’ shadowy tactics
The controversy expands beyond Shimabukuro to include NIH senior advisor Dr. David Morens, known for his close ties to Anthony Fauci. Emails obtained through FOIA requests revealed Morens advised colleagues in 2021 to bypass official channels: “Why not just shoot me at my Gmail?” he suggested, Avoiding record-keeping obligations. Morens later admitted to “retaining very few emails or documents” on pandemic-related matters—a claim Johnson decried as evidence of “complete disregard for transparency.”
This strategy mirrors tactics used by officials during Obama-era scandals like Fast and Furious, where documents were deliberately lost to evade scrutiny. The House Pandemic Select Subcommittee confirmed Morens sought legal advice from NIH’s FOIA office on how to “airbrush” communications. As Johnson noted, “If Dr. Morens is not the sole evader, what does that say about the entire system?”
Conspiracy of silence or systemic failure?
The missing records cast doubt on decades of federal health policy assurances. The 1976 swine flu debacle, where rushed vaccines caused catastrophic Guillain-Barré syndrome cases, echoes eerily today. Yet, unlike past mistakes, critics argue today’s secrecy shields officials from accountability for similar failures.
Shimabukuro’s vanishing emails could hide connections to Operation Warp Speed’s rushed vaccine approvals, potentially masking data cherry-picking or cover-ups of vaccine injuries. A January subpoena from Johnson already revealed discrepancies in CDC virology databases, with one HSS official admitting, “We never found files for many key protocols.”
Johnson’s zero-tolerance stance on obstruction carries weight: contempt of Congress charges could net violators a year in prison and $100k fines. But with HHS’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) stonewalling external audits—and the FBI and DOJ circumventing public transparency—Johnson warned, “We might never learn the truth… unless whistleblowers finally spill it.”
Conclusion: How Much Longer Can We Trust the System?
The missing emails aren’t just bureaucratic oddities—they’re KL paper trails for a potential pandemic cover-up. As Dr. Morens quipped in 2021, “I think we are all safe”—but from what? A safety protocol loophole? A convenient memory? Or a calculated gamble with human lives?
If the CDC’s chief safety officer can’t be accountable for his own records, what other corners have been cut—and whose secrets remain locked in private Gmail accounts?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Sen. Ron Johnson @SenRonJohnsonUS accuses CDC official in charge of COVID-19 injections of deleting records amid Congressional GOP scrutiny
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) has accused a key official of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of deleting records, ostensibly to impede investigations by Congress on the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
Johnson pointed his finger at the CDC's Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, who is responsible for overseeing COVID-19 safety. The senator put forward his accusation in letters addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel and Juliet Hodgkins, acting inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
"HHS officials recently informed me that Dr. Shimabukuro's records remain lost and, potentially, removed from HHS' email system altogether," Johnson wrote. The senator for the Badger State pointed out that the CDC official's "potential mishandling of his official records" was "highly concerning."
Given this development, Johnson called upon Bondi, Patel and Hodgkins to investigate whether Shimabukuro and other officials in agencies under the HHS "deleted or destroyed official agency records." The senator also demanded an inquiry into whether files were intentionally deleted to "avoid or subvert Congressional oversight or the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)."
"Any attempt to obstruct or interfere with my investigatory efforts would be grounds for contempt of Congress," Johnson warned. Anybody found guilty of contempt of Congress faces a hefty fine and 12 months behind bars.
NIH official's shocking emails: "I delete anything I don't want public"
Under the Federal Records Act, government officials are required to preserve materials "made or received by a federal agency under federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business." It was enacted in 1950 to prevent the loss of government documents – a response to past incidents where vital records were destroyed to avoid scrutiny.
Shimabukuro isn't the only one allegedly guilty of violating this law, however. Dr. David Morens of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has previously been in the crosshairs of Johnson and other GOP lawmakers. Morens, a longtime adviser to former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, went under fire after emails where he admitted to avoiding official correspondence channels were made public.
"I always communicate on Gmail because my NIH email is FOIA'd constantly," Morens wrote in an email from 2021. "I delete anything I don’t want to see in the New York Times."
In another email, Morens insinuated that Fauci – who retired in 2022 – discouraged discussions linking COVID-19 to a laboratory in China's Wuhan province. "Tony doesn't want his fingerprints on origin stories," Morens wrote.
The House of Representatives subpoenaed Morens back in October 2023, with former Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) – then the chairman of the House COVID-19 Select Subcommittee – warning that "this obstruction will not be tolerated."
Johnson later said of Shimabukuro's obstruction: "The extent to which HHS officials systemically mishandled, deleted, or destroyed their communications, data and other information relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and the vaccines must be thoroughly investigated."
As investigations proceed, legal and political battles loom. What is clear, however, is that lawmakers and the public will continue demanding answers about what was erased and why.
Watch Dr. Tom Shimabukuro of the CDC admitting that the COVID-19 vaccines cause "debilitating illness" in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/1e1885b2-97a8-488d-9388-81de97826dfc
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
But premature birth at any stage carries risks:
• Lifelong chronic illness (heart disease, diabetes, kidney failure).
• Cognitive impairments, developmental delays.
• Higher infant mortality rates.
Dr. Peter Selley, a U.K. physician, slammed regulators: "How many more trials are needed [to prove this is dangerous]?"
Global regulators disagree—while pregnant women pay the price
The FDA’s restricted window (32-36 weeks) contradicts other agencies:
• Europe (EMA): 24-36 weeks.
• France (HAS): 32-36 weeks.
• Germany (STIKO): No recommendation—citing insufficient safety data.
French scientist Hélène Banoun asked, "How can we justify that EMA, FDA, and STIKO disagree on a vaccine for vulnerable pregnant women?" The answer: Corporate influence. Pfizer’s $95 billion COVID windfall bought it political leverage, and the FDA’s approval—despite known risks—proves regulators serve Pharma, not patients.
When GSK’s RSV vaccine caused harm, it halted trials. Pfizer hid the data and pushed forward. The result? Another case of profits over people—where pregnant women and newborns bear the consequences. Karl Jablonowski of Children’s Health Defense nailed it: "A vaccine that increases prematurity is self-defeating—preterm babies are most vulnerable to RSV."
Will lawsuits finally hold Pfizer accountable? Or will we keep sacrificing mothers and children at the altar of "trust the science"—while corporations laugh their way to the bank?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Congressional Republicans have long held that the 2019 World Military Games may have been "one of the earliest super spreader events" of the pandemic. A House Foreign Affairs Committee report issued in August 2021 reinforced this position, suggesting that the virus could have been spreading in Wuhan as early as September 2019.
The investigation continues
The release of the suppressed military report has added a new layer of complexity to the ongoing debate over the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. It underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in public health crises and raises critical questions about the early spread of the virus and the actions of both the Chinese and U.S. governments. As the debate continues, the new disclosures are expected to spark further congressional inquiries into what the Biden administration knew, when it knew it, and why it withheld this report from public view for so long. The answers to these questions could have far-reaching implications for global health security and international relations.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
• Serious health risks: The MMR vaccine has been associated with serious health risks, including febrile seizures, anaphylaxis, meningitis, encephalitis, thrombocytopenia, arthralgia and vasculitis. A 2004 study found that boys vaccinated with their first MMR vaccine on time were 67% more likely to be diagnosed with autism compared to boys who received the vaccine after their third birthday.
The role of natural immunity
Proponents of natural immunity argue that contracting measles naturally provides more comprehensive and long-term immunity compared to the vaccine. While the illness can occasionally be serious, the risk of permanent injury and death from the MMR vaccine has not been proven to be less than that of measles itself.
Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), emphasized the importance of offering single measles shots as a safer alternative to the MMR vaccine. "If the Department of Health really wants to use a vaccine strategy to go after measles, then they should offer people a single measles shot. It would be safer than the MMR, which has proven to carry many serious risks."
Conclusion
The death of Daisy Hildebrand serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges in treating infectious diseases. While the measles vaccine has played a role in reducing the incidence of the disease, the case highlights the critical importance of proper medical care and the need for ongoing research into vaccine safety and efficacy. As the debate continues, it is crucial to balance public health measures with individual health concerns and to ensure that medical errors are identified and addressed to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Last month, a 6-year-old child in West Texas died after developing pneumonia while recovering from measles. Media seized the opportunity to disparage the parents, members of a Mennonite community, for not vaccinating their child.
As our science and CHD. TV teams uncovered — after enlisting experts to review the child’s medical records — the little girl died not “from” measles, as media claimed, but from a tragic medical error.
In fact, the hospital properly diagnosed the little girl’s pneumonia — a community-acquired pneumonia that, when treated properly is not life-threatening. Unfortunately, the doctors failed to use the standard antibiotic indicated for treating her pneumonia until it was too late.
Even after CHD exposed the accurate cause of death, The New York Times reported the 6-year-old died from measles — and accused us of making “unfounded claims” about the death.
Last week, a second child in West Texas died. The media and Texas health officials reported the death as “measles pulmonary failure.” CHD is working with the child’s parents to analyze her medical records. We will report, accurately, on what we find.
The media have accused CHD and the health freedom movement — or “anti-vaxxers” as reporters love to call us — of “weaponizing” the tragic death of the 6-year-old who died because of a medical error. (We should point out that death by medical error is not uncommon in the U.S. It’s estimated that at least 250,000 people die every year as a result of the wrong diagnosis or treatment, making it the third-leading cause of death).
The death of any child, for any reason, is heartbreaking. But in this case, who are the real “weaponizers?”
If media are genuinely concerned about children’s lives, where are the reports on children’s injuries and deaths from COVID-19 vaccines? From MMR vaccines? From the other 14 shots on the CDC-recommended schedule?
Last month, CHD reported on the senseless death of a 1-year-old roughly 12 hours after the child’s pediatrician insisted on administering six shots of 12 vaccines at once.
Where were the headlines deploring this child’s death, denouncing the child’s pediatrician? Where were the reports on the known dangers of “catching up” babies and children on vaccines?
As the media remain radio silent on the carnage inflicted on innocent children by a powerful, greedy industry and its minions in Congress, CHD is honoring the legacy of these children by reporting the facts, telling the truth and insisting on the rights of parents to make independent, informed medical decisions.
This latest round of attacks on the health freedom movement is a measure of pharma’s fear. We are winning. Pharma knows it.
We have no intention of backing down from the facts: Vaccines cause serious injuries, including death. As Big Pharma and Big Media wage a renewed battle for the hearts and minds of parents, we must strengthen our resolve, we must stay true to our mission.
Our children deserve nothing less.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The military, as an institution, is built on the principles of honor, courage, and commitment. Forcing service members to take a vaccine against their will or informed decision-making capabilities is a betrayal of these principles. The spineless act of coercing fellow service members should be punished through swift termination and dishonorable discharge. The military's best, strongest, and most courageous members should be those who stand up for what is right, even when it is difficult.
As the military continues to deal with the aftermath of the vaccine mandates, the court's decision and the Trump administration's actions offer a glimmer of hope. The fight for individual liberty and the protection of constitutional rights is far from over, but these developments are a reminder that the rule of law and the courage of individuals can still prevail. In the words of former Marine Capt. Dale Saran, "That’s the fraud that’s at the heart of our case." The truth will continue to emerge, and justice will be served.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Researchers suggested strain mismatch—a misalignment between the vaccine and circulating flu variants—may explain the poor performance. Lyons-Weiler added that thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative in 98.7% of administered doses, could weaken immune responses. Thimerosal has been tied to neurodevelopmental risks in earlier studies, raising further safety concerns.
CDC data shows declining flu vaccine uptake among healthcare workers, signaling growing skepticism. “Annual flu vaccine strategies may need a serious rethink,” wrote TrialSite News, urging policymakers to address evidence of potential harm.
The study’s implications extend beyond this flu season, challenging the foundation of mass vaccination campaigns. As Baker noted, “It may be asking for too much to expect [the vaccine] to be highly effective year after year.” With public trust in vaccines wavering, health officials face pressure to reevaluate blanket recommendations—and the science behind them.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The implications of this audit are far-reaching. If the federal government decides to withhold funding due to noncompliance, it could have severe economic consequences for the state. Additionally, the proposed payroll tax hikes could place a significant burden on businesses, potentially leading to job cuts and economic slowdown.
Conclusion
The state auditor's report underscores the critical need for improved oversight and accountability in California's management of federal programs. As the state grapples with the fallout from the audit, it is clear that significant reforms are necessary to restore public trust and ensure the responsible use of taxpayer dollars. The federal government's response to these findings will be closely watched, as it could set a precedent for how other states are held accountable for their use of federal funds.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia