16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A call for vigilance in an era of scientific uncertainty
The Taiwanese study’s near-total obscurity in mainstream media highlights both the challenges of communicating difficult science and the uneven playing field facing researchers who question vaccine safety. As of May 2025, the paper had received limited attention despite its publication in a major journal — a pattern authors attribute to systemic reluctance to scrutinize widely deployed public health tools.
Meanwhile, broader population trends hint at unsolved puzzles. Data from the CDC and other agencies show elevated mortality in several high-income nations with high mRNA uptake, even as pandemic deaths dwindle. While not definitively linked to vaccines, lingering autoimmune effects like thyroid dysfunction could contribute to such trends by worsening chronic conditions over years.
As nations grapple with mandates for annual booster shots and mRNA-based flu vaccines, the study underscores why transparency matters: Thyroid disorders often progress slowly, with symptoms dismissed as stress or aging before a definitive diagnosis. In that light, the researchers’ call for “ongoing thyroid function monitoring” after mRNA vaccination now feels less like a technical recommendation and more like a plea for caution.
The mRNA vaccine safety debate
The current controversy mirrors past public health disputes over vaccines and medications. The 1950s polio vaccine’s rollout, for instance, sparked early debates about rare but serious adverse events, spurring improvements in safety protocols. Similarly, modern mRNA technology’s rapid deployment during the pandemic sidestepped decades of standard pre-approval trials, leaving unresolved questions about long-term effects especially in non-pandemic settings.
Today’s studies, often published in obscure journals or sidelined by mainstream discourse, reflect a broader struggle over science communication. As more data emerge, the challenge becomes clear: Balancing pandemic-era urgency with the ethics of informed consent demands fearless scrutiny of mRNA’s collateral health costs, even as the world moves forward.
The unfinished journey toward vaccine transparency
This study does not condemn mRNA vaccines as inherently dangerous. But it does demand answers — especially given their now-widespread use beyond emergency settings. If thyroid risks emerge as just one facet of long-term immune disruption, future generations may look back on the 2020s as a moment when scientific humility collided with crisis-driven mandates. Whether openness prevails over complacency could determine how millions of lives unfold, one gland at a time.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
WHO offering pandemic “Equitable Vaccine Access” is like offering all humans equitable turns at Russian Roulette – Step right up for your equal access death jabs folks
The WHO wants everyone to be able to access the next plandemic death jabs, including terrorists who could pretend to be scientists and access the pathogen vials. The “Pandemic Treaty” the WHO is pushing for is an end of the world “treaty” where equal access means everybody dies, not just those with co-morbidities who get the mRNA prions-forever stabs.
“Equitable Vaccine Access” means any psychopath could get his hands on the gain-of-function pathogens and genetically modified viruses and spread them
The WHO wants anyone and everyone to have access to world-ending bioweapons next time around. Let everybody have the vaccines and the pathogen vials so we can all be safe from ... wait for it ... wait for it... a virus mutated in a lab and made to make billions of people sick, and vaccines that create clots in the vascular system that catapult all-cause mortality rates. Great. Great plan WHO.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is advocating for equitable vaccine access ahead of the next pandemic through its proposed Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response Agreement (Pandemic Treaty). While the treaty alone won’t prevent future pandemics, it aims to address inequities in vaccine distribution, particularly for low- and middle-income countries.
Key proposals include:
1. 20% Real-Time Sharing: Manufacturers would allocate 20% of vaccines and medical countermeasures to poorer nations in exchange for access to pathogen samples and genetic data—though compliance remains voluntary.
2. Technology Transfer: Wealthy nations are urged (but not mandated) to facilitate voluntary tech transfers to boost local vaccine production in developing countries during crises.
However, challenges persist:
• The Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) system relies on manufacturers agreeing to share vaccines in return for pathogen data, but mutating pathogens reduce the leverage of such agreements.
• Pharmaceutical companies, absent from negotiations, may resist binding obligations without clear cost-benefit analyses, preferring direct deals with the WHO.
• Critics argue the treaty lacks enforceable equity mechanisms, relying on "best endeavour" language rather than accountable international coordination.
The Third World Network highlights gaps in the draft text, stressing the need for:
• A fully linked system for sharing pathogens and benefits equally.
• Stronger governance with civil society and private-sector inclusion.
Despite the WHO’s push for global vaccine equity, logistical hurdles, corporate profit motives, and weak enforcement risk perpetuating disparities. The treaty’s success hinges on binding commitments, not just voluntary pledges, to ensure fair access in future health crises.
The WHO needs to be shut down and the key players from the Covid scamdemic need to be put in prison for life. Not one single person has been jailed for crimes against humanity during the Covid death wave. Not one. Nobody has even been indicted yet. The mass murderers got away with it. Will they again? What will happen to Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci next time around? What about all the presstitutes who pushed the vaccine narrative? Who will pay the price for this treason and mass-manipulation? Only time will tell.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA cracks down on COVID-19 vaccines: No full licenses without clinical trial data for most Americans
For years, the U.S. government pushed COVID-19 vaccines on every American, from infants to the elderly, with little regard for individual risk or long-term safety. Now, in a stunning reversal, the FDA has announced it will no longer grant full approvals for these vaccines in healthy individuals without gold-standard clinical trial data proving they actually work—and don’t cause more harm than good.
The new policy, published in the New England Journal of Medicine by FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad, marks a seismic shift in vaccine regulation. No longer will Big Pharma be allowed to peddle experimental shots to low-risk populations based solely on antibody levels—a flimsy metric that ignores real-world health outcomes. Instead, the FDA is demanding randomized, placebo-controlled trials before granting full Biologics License Applications (BLAs) for healthy Americans under 65.
This move comes as public trust in vaccines plummets, with fewer than 25% of Americans opting for COVID boosters last year. Even health care workers, once the most compliant demographic, are refusing them in droves. The FDA’s belated course correction exposes the reckless "one-size-fits-all" approach that prioritized profits over science—and left millions questioning whether they were ever truly protected or simply guinea pigs in a mass medical experiment.
Key points:
• The FDA will no longer fully license COVID-19 vaccines for healthy Americans aged 6 months to 64 without randomized clinical trial data proving real-world benefits.
• Only high-risk groups (those over 65 or with comorbidities) will continue to receive vaccines under looser immunogenicity standards.
• The policy shift follows plummeting booster uptake and growing skepticism about repeated vaccinations in low-risk populations.
• Pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna must now conduct rigorous trials—including placebo groups—to prove their shots are worth the risk.
A regulatory reckoning: From emergency use to evidence-based medicine
For years, the FDA rubber-stamped COVID-19 vaccines under emergency use authorizations (EUAs), bypassing the rigorous testing required for full approval. Even after granting full licensure to Pfizer’s and Moderna’s shots, the agency ignored glaring red flags—skyrocketing myocarditis cases in young men, sudden cardiac events in athletes, and a surge in autoimmune disorders.
Now, the FDA admits what dissenting doctors have warned all along: Antibody levels alone don’t guarantee protection. "We simply don’t know whether a healthy 52-year-old woman with a normal BMI who has had COVID-19 three times and has received six previous doses of a COVID-19 vaccine will benefit from the seventh dose," the FDA officials wrote.
The new policy forces drugmakers to answer that question with hard data—not PR spin. Future trials must track symptomatic infections, hospitalizations, and deaths over at least six months, with control groups receiving placebos to unmask potential side effects.
The fallout: Big Pharma’s cash cow in jeopardy
Pfizer, Moderna, and Novavax—companies that raked in billions from government-backed vaccine mandates—now face an existential threat. Their business model relied on perpetual boosters, sold to every American regardless of need. With the FDA tightening standards, their revenue streams could dry up overnight.
The agency’s stance also undermines the CDC’s aggressive push for universal vaccination. For years, CDC officials dismissed natural immunity, downplayed vaccine injuries, and smeared critics as "anti-science." Now, even the FDA acknowledges that prior infection provides robust protection—a fact censored during the pandemic.
A turning point for medical freedom
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
6-month-old dies just hours after taking SIX routine vaccines at a “wellness visit”: Parents demand justice as SIDS COVERUP unravels
The tragic death of 6-month-old Blessings Myrical Jean Simmons has reignited urgent questions about the safety of the CDC’s aggressive childhood vaccination schedule—and the systemic cover-ups that follow when infants pay the ultimate price. Just hours after receiving six routine vaccines at a so-called "wellness visit," Blessings was found lifeless in her bassinet, her tiny body cold and unresponsive. The autopsy report, stamped with the vague and dismissive label of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), failed to acknowledge the glaring truth her parents already knew: their healthy, thriving baby had been killed by a medical system that prioritizes Big Pharma profits over infant safety.
As grieving parents Brishe McKinley and Elijah Simmons fight for answers, their story exposes a disturbing pattern of negligence, gaslighting, and outright deception by public health officials. From coroners who refuse to list vaccines as a cause of death to pediatricians who push toxic injections without informed consent, the medical-industrial complex continues to sacrifice children on the altar of forced immunization—while silencing those who dare to speak out.
Key points:
• Blessings Myrical Jean Simmons died less than 14 hours after receiving six vaccines at a routine wellness visit, yet her death certificate listed SIDS—a catch-all term that ignores vaccine-induced fatalities.
• Parents report being dismissed by authorities when raising concerns about vaccine injuries, with coroners and police refusing to investigate the timing of immunizations.
• A former police detective revealed that 50% of SIDS cases she investigated involved a recent vaccination, yet medical examiners systematically omit this critical detail.
• The clinic later admitted vaccines likely caused Blessings’ death by reporting it to VAERS—a system notorious for under-reporting 99% of adverse events.
• The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), designed to shield manufacturers from lawsuits, offers little justice for grieving families.
The wellness visit deception: A Trojan horse for vaccine injury
Wellness visits, marketed as essential for infant health, have become little more than state-sanctioned poisoning sessions, where vulnerable babies are injected with neurotoxic aluminum, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens—all under the guise of "prevention."
Blessings was in "perfect health" during her six-month pediatric visit, her mother, McKinley, recounted. Just five days shy of turning 6 months old, the baby was cooing, babbling, and behaving normally before receiving multiple vaccines as part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recommended immunization schedule.
According to vaccination records reviewed by CHD. TV, Blessings was administered six vaccines: a second dose of DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis), inactivated poliovirus, Hib (Haemophilus influenzae type b), rotavirus, pneumococcal, and a third dose of hepatitis B. She received two injections in each leg, along with two oral vaccines.
“I thought we were doing what we needed to do to keep her healthy and safe,” McKinley said.
Shortly after the shots, Blessings became unusually fussy and cried more than normal. Her parents assumed it was due to injection site pain and gave her Tylenol as recommended by the pediatrician. Her father rocked her to sleep, and the family went to bed.
Tragedy struck the next morning. “When we woke up, we found her lifeless,” McKinley said. “Her body was cold.”
The incident has left the family devastated and questioning vaccine safety. No official cause of death has been released, but the case adds to growing concerns among some parents about potential adverse reactions to routine immunizations.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Australia’s COVID inquiry WHITEWASHED – no accountability for medical coercion and human rights abuses
When a government weaponizes fear to justify the destruction of civil liberties, it doesn’t just betray its citizens—it sets a dangerous precedent for future tyranny. Australia’s so-called "independent" COVID Inquiry, released in late 2023, was never about truth or justice. Instead, it was a carefully orchestrated farce designed to absolve the architects of lockdowns, mandates, and medical coercion while paving the way for even greater government overreach in the next "crisis."
The 868-page report, buried in bureaucratic jargon and selectively blocked from public access by the Australian government’s own security service, reads like a dystopian wish list for centralized control. Rather than condemning the catastrophic failures of pandemic policies—school closures, forced vaccinations, and the criminalization of dissent—the panel praised the "agility" of lockdowns and called for more government power. Experts warn this sham inquiry is a roadmap to medical fascism, not accountability.
Key points:
• The Australian COVID Inquiry was a toothless whitewash, lacking subpoena power and stacked with government-aligned panelists.
• Instead of condemning lockdowns and mandates, the report praised them and demanded greater centralized control in future health crises.
• Experts slammed the findings, calling them "the opposite of what needs to be done," warning of more lockdowns, surveillance, and eroded freedoms.
• The government refuses to apologize, with Health Minister Mark Butler dismissing calls for accountability while pushing for a CDC-style authority.
• Senators demand a real Royal Commission to investigate pandemic abuses, but the political establishment resists transparency.
A rigged inquiry, a preordained outcome
From the start, the inquiry was designed to fail. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese abandoned his promise of a full Royal Commission—which would have compelled testimony under oath—and instead convened a panel with no real investigative power. Two of its three members had already endorsed the government’s draconian COVID policies, ensuring a rubber-stamp verdict.
The report’s conclusions were as predictable as they were grotesque: lockdowns "saved lives," border closures were "necessary," and the real problem wasn’t tyranny—it was inconsistent tyranny. The panel lamented that state governments didn’t coordinate their oppression well enough, proposing a single "authoritative" public health voice (read: propaganda arm) to eliminate dissent next time.
Gigi Foster, an economics professor at the University of New South Wales, shredded the report’s logic: "If we adopt these recommendations, we will be worse off next time. It will make it easier to lock down, close schools, and surveil people—none of that promotes health."
The real victims: Children sacrificed for state control
One of the most damning admissions in the report—buried beneath layers of bureaucratic spin—was the panel’s acknowledgment of the "erosion of trust" caused by government overreach. But instead of condemning the abuse, the report doubled down, suggesting the solution was more control.
Foster, who warned early about the harms of lockdowns, exposed the moral bankruptcy of Australia’s policies: "We used children as shields for the elderly. School closures, masking kids, vaccinating them—all to protect adults. It was child abuse."
Ramesh Thakur, a former UN official, blasted the government’s refusal to follow pre-existing pandemic plans or conduct cost-benefit analyses: "They became fixated on ‘case numbers’ and ignored civil liberties. Leaders had no skin in the game—they destroyed lives while suffering no consequences."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Policy shift: HHS steps back amid scientific discord
In tandem with the research, HHS announced plans to withdraw routine recommendations for vaccinating children and pregnant women in early 2025. This decision, led by Kennedy—a longtime vaccine skeptic—aligns with his broader push for stricter scrutiny of pharmaceutical practices. The move follows FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary’s call for placebo-controlled trials for all new vaccines and mirrors concerns expressed by the European Medicines Agency about mRNA technology’s risks in younger populations.
The policy reversal reflects mounting pressure from health freedom advocates and parents, many of whom cite personal experiences of adverse effects. However, critics argue the change could undermine protections for immunocompromised individuals. Richard Hughes, a vaccine advocate, warned of behavioral impacts, noting that insurer coverage for pediatric doses may wane.
A turning point for vaccine policy
The Israeli study and HHS’s bold policy shift signal a pivotal moment in the global public health debate. While experts like Perro urge immediate suspension of pediatric vaccines pending further research, others caution against overinterpretation of early findings. With autoimmune diseases projected to affect 23.5 million Americans by 2025—many in previously healthy demographics—the urgency to prioritize long-term immune safety has never been clearer.
As debates intensify over individual choice versus public health mandates, one certainty emerges: the era of unquestioned vaccine mandates may be ending. Whether this marks a return to scientific rigor or fuels dangerous complacency remains to be seen. For now, the call for transparency—and time—resonates across scientific, political and parental spheres alike.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Legal battles are already mounting, from lawsuits over vaccine injuries to criminal complaints against officials who suppressed early treatments. But true justice requires mass awakening — a rejection of the "biosecurity" regime that used pandemics as pretexts for control. The unvaccinated, once marginalized, now lead that fight, proving that medical freedom, not compliance, is the path to a healthier society.
This man's raw admission exposes the catastrophic failure of government and corporate coercion, revealing how natural immunity and medical freedom were the true paths to health — not experimental mRNA injections. As the vaccinated face mounting health crises, the unvaccinated stand vindicated, their skepticism of Big Pharma and authoritarian mandates proven justified. Now, the question remains: Will the victims of this medical tyranny unite to demand justice?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The great cover-up: AI won’t save a poisoned population
Instead of confronting the truth, the BHF proposes AI, data science, and "behavioral nudges" as solutions. Dr. Charmaine Griffiths, BHF’s CEO, claims: "By driving a research revolution, we can reverse this worrying trend." But no amount of algorithmic tinkering will undo the damage caused by toxic injections and state-sponsored terror.
The real solution? Stop the shots. Investigate the injuries. Hold the perpetrators accountable. Until then, the bodies will keep piling up—while the architects of this disaster pretend they don’t see the blood on their hands.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Conservative MEPs call for political consequences against von der Leyen after ECJ ruling on Pfizergate
Conservative Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have called for political consequences against European Commission (EC) President Ursula von der Leyen, following a verdict by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) over the Pfizergate scandal involving her.
The ECJ's verdict issued Wednesday, May 14, ruled that von der Leyen unlawfully withheld critical documents related to her secret negotiations with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla for billions of dollars in Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine contracts. The tribunal found that the EC president violated transparency laws and voided her decision to withhold the documents.
The verdict found the EC's justifications "based on assumptions or imprecise information" and ordered the immediate release of the documents. However, von der Leyen is expected to appeal – delaying disclosure for about one to two years.
The ECJ verdict appears to be essentially toothless, as even mainstream media has acknowledged that the verdict will have "no real-world political fallout" either. This is because there's no mechanism to hold von der Leyen accountable, and MEPs part of her so-called "Ursula coalition" have no motivation to do so.
But conservative MEPs had none of it, with some calling for the "public humiliation" of the ECJ verdict to translate to real-life consequences and for the EC president to step down. Danish MEP Anders Vistisen of the Patriots for Europe parliamentary group pointed out that if von der Leyen "has nothing to hide, she has nothing to fear."
French Former MEP Patricia Chagnon of the National Rally shared similar views. "Politicians get their mandate from their electorate, and therefore must remain accountable to them," she said. "When you start hiding stuff, that's no longer a democracy."
Will the European Parliament finally hold von der Leyen accountable?
The ECJ decision marks a pivotal moment in the escalating Pfizergate scandal, exposing systemic secrecy at the highest levels of the EU and raising urgent questions about accountability for what some lawmakers call "the biggest corruption scandal in human history."
Critics argue von der Leyen's actions mirror past scandals. Vistisen even recounted how she allegedly deleted evidence during a German defense procurement fraud case. She dodged accountability for that case upon her election as EC president in 2019.
The ruling also highlighted a glaring double standard. While the ECJ's recent ruling sided with the New York Times (NYT) – which filed the lawsuit – a separate case filed by over 1,000 citizens, NGOs and member states in Belgium was dismissed by a court there for lacking "personal harm."
German MEP Christine Anderson of the Europe of Sovereign Nations parliamentary group condemned the disparity. In a post on X, she questioned how the NYT "has achieved what parliamentarians and citizens have been denied."
Former Dutch MEP Rob Roos, a member of the European Conservatives and Reformists parliamentary group, also echoed Anderson's sentiments. He wrote on X: "Why should a foreign newspaper possess stronger transparency rights than a MEP, than European citizens and member states themselves?"
With von der Leyen's allies likely to block further investigations, the battle now shifts to the European Parliament. Anderson, Vistisen and their conservative colleagues are demanding the formation of an inquiry committee with subpoena power. But as the legal battle drags on, the public may never see the full truth – leaving Pfizergate as a defining scandal of von der Leyen's tenure and a cautionary tale of power unchecked.
Watch Josh Sigurdon of World Alternative Media discussing calls for the European Parliament to prosecute Pfizer over its role in the Pfizergate scandal.
https://www.brighteon.com/ed2d1863-8fe0-4de8-9d81-e11aabf35ca7
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA approves Novavax COVID vaccine grown in moth cells — 100% efficacy claim based on just 14 placebo cases, raising serious safety concerns
While the mainstream media touts Novavax’s Nuvaxovid as a "safer, more traditional" alternative to mRNA vaccines, the truth behind its FDA approval is far more unsettling. The agency green-lit this genetically engineered, insect-cell-derived vaccine based on shockingly weak evidence — just 14 moderate-to-severe COVID cases in the placebo group, with zero in the vaccinated group. This flimsy foundation allowed Novavax to claim 100% efficacy, a statistical illusion that crumbles under scrutiny.
Worse, the FDA bypassed its own advisory committee, ignored post-market reports of heart inflammation, menstrual disruptions, and even deaths, and deferred long-term safety studies for years. The public is being sold a dangerous illusion of safety while regulators and corporations collude to push another experimental product onto an unsuspecting population.
Key points:
• The FDA granted full approval to Novavax’s Nuvaxovid despite its efficacy claim resting on just 14 placebo cases — a statistically meaningless sample size.
• The vaccine is produced using genetically modified moth cells infected with a baculovirus, raising contamination and informed consent concerns.
• No severe COVID cases occurred in vaccinated participants — not because the vaccine worked flawlessly, but because the trial was too small and short (only 3 months).
• Post-market data from Australia revealed alarming rates of myocarditis, pericarditis, anaphylaxis, and menstrual disturbances — none of which were properly studied before approval.
• The FDA skipped advisory committee review, dismissing known risks while deferring critical safety studies for up to a decade.
The illusion of "100% efficacy"
The FDA’s approval hinges on a New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) study that followed participants for a mere three months, with only 14 moderate-to-severe COVID cases in the placebo group. This microscopic sample size allowed Novavax to claim 100% efficacy against severe disease — a marketing triumph, but a scientific farce.
Dr. Peter Doshi, senior editor of The BMJ, has long criticized such statistical sleight of hand, pointing out that small, short trials are designed to inflate efficacy while hiding long-term risks. In this case, the trial didn’t even include a single vaccinated senior citizen with severe COVID — meaning the claim of protection for high-risk groups is pure speculation.
How Novavax’s vaccine is made: A Frankenstein science experiment
Unlike mRNA shots, which instruct the body to produce spike proteins, Novavax’s vaccine pre-manufactures the spike protein inside moth cells. Here’s how it works:
• Genetically modified baculovirus infects moth cells – Scientists insert the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein gene into a baculovirus, which is then used to infect fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) cells.
• Insect cells become spike protein factories – The infected moth cells mass-produce the spike protein, which is then harvested and purified.
• Adjuvant boosts immune response – The spike proteins are mixed with Matrix-M, an immune-stimulating adjuvant derived from tree bark.
But there’s a catch: nearly all Sf9 moth cell lines are contaminated with Sf-rhabdovirus, an RNA virus that could theoretically end up in the final product. The FDA has no long-term data on how these contaminants — or the spike protein itself — might affect human biology.
Post-market red flags: Heart damage, menstrual chaos, and ignored deaths
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Unlike mRNA vaccines, Novavax’s protein-based shot — which delivers pre-made spike protein — does not trigger TENT5A activity. Immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle explained, "The lipid nanoparticles in Pfizer and Moderna’s shots are the Trojan horse. They smuggle synthetic mRNA into cells, but the payload doesn’t just fade away — it gets enhanced by the immune system."
The Nature study challenges the foundational safety claims of mRNA vaccines, revealing a mechanism that could lead to prolonged spike protein exposure and unknown health risks. With mounting evidence of regulatory oversights and undisclosed dangers, the findings demand urgent scrutiny. As the scientific community grapples with these revelations, millions who received the shots now face unanswered questions about their long-term well-being. The era of blind trust in rushed medical interventions may be over—but for many, the consequences are just beginning.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Hyping the next plandemic: Researchers in Nebraska develop vaccine targeting all flu strains
Scientists at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) have developed a single vaccine that targets multiple strains of influenza – including swine flu, bird flu and seasonal flu – fueling concerns that the next plandemic is on the horizon.
The experimental vaccine, designed using advanced computational modeling, has shown promise in protecting pigs against diverse influenza A viruses. The researchers have also expressed optimism that the injection will protect birds and humans from these pathogens. But skeptics warn that such vaccines may carry unforeseen dangers, including immune suppression and failure against mutated strains.
In a study published late last month in Nature Communications, the UNL researchers detailed how the Epigraph vaccine – named after the software used to design it – outperformed existing commercial vaccines in swine trials. Pigs vaccinated with Epigraph developed robust immunity against 12 different flu strains – including the H1N1 virus responsible for the 2009 swine flu pandemic. The H1N1 strain infected a quarter of the global population and killed over half a million people.
Dr. Eric Weaver, the study's lead author, called the findings a critical step toward a universal flu vaccine that could last a decade or longer. "If we can prevent influenza in swine, we can cut off the virus’s evolutionary advantage," he added. According to Weaver, also the director of the Nebraska Center for Virology at UNL, pigs often act as a "mixing vessel" for dangerous zoonotic jumps between birds and humans.
Is the Epigraph flu injection a Trojan horse for the next plandemic?
The Epigraph vaccine was developed after researchers analyzed over 6,000 influenza strains from the past century to identify common viral markers (epitopes) that trigger immune responses. Unlike traditional vaccines, which target rapidly mutating surface proteins, targeting these epitopes could lead to broader, longer-lasting protection.
Weaver's team is now testing a dual H1/H3 variant vaccine, with hopes of eventual human trials. However, no timeline has been set for public availability.
Despite the optimism, critics argue that such vaccines may be ineffective against future mutations or even weaken natural immunity. Others, meanwhile, argue that such vaccines and their rollout under government-backed vaccination programs prioritize profit over safety.
Historical context supports caution. Past flu vaccines have sometimes offered limited protection, and the 1976 swine flu debacle saw mass vaccinations halted after rare neurological side effects emerged.
The stakes are high; influenza A infects up to 15 percent of humans annually, with H1 and H3 subtypes causing thousands of deaths. The European Union recently flagged pigs as a potential catalyst for a deadly bird flu mutation transmissible to humans. Weaver's research, funded by the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, aims to preempt such crises.
"We're on the precipice of a third wave of vaccines – lifelong and universal," he said. But as with all medical breakthroughs, the balance between innovation and risk remains delicate. Vaccines like Epigraph may cause more harm than good, as they undermine the body's natural immunity.
One cannot help but notice, however, that the news of Epigraph's supposed "promise" comes amid reports of the flu virus "jumping from animals to humans." This same pattern was observed during the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. But sooner or later, people may see Epigraph become ubiquitous amid this new "plandemic" in the same manner as the mRNA vaccines.
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree talking about a study that shows getting the flu vaccine increases one's chances of catching influenza.
https://www.brighteon.com/8f929852-c5cb-4471-9476-4de9afd52361
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Biden’s autopen scandal exposed: Staffers accused of signing key documents amid mental decline
The White House is embroiled in a constitutional crisis as House investigators uncover evidence that former President Joe Biden’s autopen was used to authorize critical pardons and executive orders during a period of alleged cognitive decline.
Rep. James Comer (R-KY), Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, revealed this weekend that his team has identified the staffers responsible and plans to subpoena them if they refuse to testify. The controversy, first ignited by President Donald Trump’s declaration that autopen-signed pardons were “void,” now threatens to expose a shadow government operating behind the scenes of Biden’s presidency.
The autopen deception
According to Comer, congressional investigators have obtained hard evidence showing that Biden’s autopen was used to sign pardons—including those benefiting his family—and executive orders while the president was “clearly in mental decline.” The Oversight Committee’s findings suggest that Biden’s handlers may have bypassed the chief executive entirely, raising alarming questions about who was truly running the country.
“Yeah, that’s hard evidence early in President Biden’s term,” Comer told Fox News. “It clearly shows that he was in significant mental decline. It raises questions about who was actually making the decisions.”
The scandal gained traction in March when Trump denounced the autopen-signed pardons as illegitimate. “Joe Biden did not sign them,” Trump posted on Truth Social, “and the people that did may have committed a crime.” He later demanded accountability, asking, “Why did the Auto Pen give Schiff a Pardon? They almost destroyed our Country. They should all be in jail!!”
A cover-up unravels
The Oversight Project previously revealed that every pardon signed on January 19 bore the same autopen signature, suggesting a systemic effort to conceal Biden’s inability to fulfill his duties. Journalist Cristina Laila of The Gateway Pundit reported that former White House Staff Secretary Neera Tanden allegedly facilitated the autopen usage while Biden was on vacation. Tanden, a controversial figure linked to the debunked Russiagate narrative, has yet to publicly address the allegations.
Comer’s committee is now preparing to issue subpoenas. “We think we’ve identified who the staffers are,” he said. “We’re going to bring everyone we believe was involved in any role in the use of the autopen. If they decline, they will receive a subpoena and face a full-blown deposition.”
The investigation coincides with newly released audio from Special Counsel Robert Hur’s October 2023 interview with Biden, which exposed the president’s alarming memory lapses. Biden struggled to recall the year his son Beau died, the date of Trump’s election, and even basic terms like “fax machine.” Hur’s report described Biden as a “sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory,” further fueling concerns about his fitness for office.
The broader implications
Trump has framed the autopen scandal as part of a larger conspiracy, linking it to election interference and Democratic corruption. “Whoever had control of the ‘AUTOPEN’ is looking to be a bigger and bigger scandal by the moment,” he posted. Critics argue the White House’s reliance on the autopen, coupled with Biden’s documented cognitive struggles, proves that unelected operatives were making decisions without transparency.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Pandemic architect Dr. Jeremy Farrar promoted amid World Health Organization’s leadership shakeup
The World Health Organization (WHO) has promoted Briton Dr. Jeremy Farrar, a key architect of controversial Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic policies, as part of a sweeping restructuring that includes deep budget cuts and staff reductions.
Reuters first reported Farrar's promotion from chief scientist to assistant director-general on Wednesday, May 14. In his new position, Farrar will now oversee health promotion, disease prevention. and control – a role that solidifies his influence within the global health body as it grapples with financial instability and waning credibility.
The restructuring, which aims to reset the WHO's image, also sidelines longtime figures like Dr. Mike Ryan and Dr. Bruce Aylward. Their replacements include Dr. Chikwe Ihekweazu, a Nigerian-German expert now leading health emergencies, and Dr. Sylvie Briand from France, the new chief scientist.
Farrar's ascent marks a pivotal moment for the WHO, which is slashing its management team from 14 to seven leaders and reducing its budget by 21 percent for 2026-2027, down to $4.2 billion. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus acknowledged the cuts would force the organization to scale back operations, including closing offices in high-income countries.
The downsizing comes just months after the second Trump administration declared the U.S. would withdraw from the WHO Washington's decision to exit the global health body in January deprived it of its largest donor – something critics say reflects broader disillusionment with the agency's pandemic response.
Farrar's secret role in silencing the lab leak theory
Before joining the WHO, Farrar directed the Wellcome Trust and played a central role in shaping lockdowns, mask mandates and mass vaccination campaigns. Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst suggested Farrar may have been the WHO's de facto leader during the pandemic, wielding outsized influence over its policies.
He also collaborated on a pivotal March 2020 paper in Nature Medicine that dismissed the lab-leak theory of COVID-19's origins. Though not listed as a co-author, Farrar worked closely with American infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci and others to draft the paper, a move critics allege was an ethical breach. His ties to Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance – which funded coronavirus research at China's Wuhan Institute of Virology – have further fueled scrutiny.
Richard Ebright, molecular biologist at Rutgers University, slammed Farrar's promotion as a reward for misinformation. He accused the Briton of helping "defraud the global public" about COVID-19's origins.
Farrar's promotion comes weeks before global leaders gather in Geneva to debate a contentious pandemic agreement. The WHO's proposed pandemic agreement, intended to centralize global health governance, remains in limbo after failing to gain consensus last year. Independent journalist James Roguski noted that even if adopted, the treaty cannot take effect until 2026 due to procedural delays.
As the WHO scrambles to offset lost U.S. funding, it is turning to private donors like the Gates Foundation, its second-largest backer. Yet Brownstone Institute President Jeffrey Tucker of the Brownstone Institute argued that the global health body's credibility is irreparably damaged.
"The future is not with the WHO," said Tucker, who founded the think tank in 2021. "They massively bungled the pandemic with no admission of wrongdoing."
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree discussing the U.S. Congress' probe on Dr. Jeremy Farrar's role in obfuscating the origins of COVID-19 in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/64c53d97-5c06-4ecd-9f5a-99e066300622
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Victory for health freedom: HHS drops COVID-19 vaccine mandates for children and pregnant women
In a monumental win against medical tyranny,the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is finally rolling back its reckless, one-size-fits-all COVID-19 vaccination recommendations for children, teenagers and pregnant women—a long-overdue correction to years of fear-driven propaganda. This bold reversal, first reported by the Wall Street Journal on May 15, signals a turning point in the fight for medical freedom and informed consent, as the truth about unnecessary vaccine risks for low-risk populations can no longer be ignored.
Under the leadership of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—a fearless advocate for transparency and accountability in public health—the federal government is finally acknowledging what independent scientists and medical professionals have warned about for years: COVID-19 poses minimal risk to healthy children, and the aggressive push to vaccinate them was never based on sound science, but rather on corporate profit and political coercion.
The collapse of the COVID-19 vaccine narrative
For far too long, federal agencies like the CDC and FDA ignored alarming safety signals, dismissed mounting injury reports and suppressed dissenting voices in their zeal to push experimental mRNA shots on the entire population. Now, the dam is breaking.
• CDC backpedals: The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which once blindly rubber-stamped COVID-19 vaccines for infants as young as six months, is now quietly retreating from its extremist stance.
• FDA admits lack of evidence: Even FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary conceded on May 15 that there is no clear benefit in forcing COVID-19 vaccines on young, healthy children—a stunning admission from an agency that once claimed these shots were "safe and effective" without long-term safety data.
• Global shift: The U.S. is finally aligning with sensible countries like the U.K. and Australia, where routine COVID-19 vaccination for healthy children was never recommended—because the science never justified it.
The truth about vaccine injuries can no longer be hidden
With over 1.6 million reported vaccine injuries and deaths in the U.S. alone (per VAERS data), the catastrophic toll of these rushed, under-tested shots is undeniable. Myocarditis in young males, neurological disorders and reproductive harm are just a few of the devastating side effects that were downplayed or outright ignored by health authorities.
Kennedy’s HHS is now demanding higher safety standards, including placebo-controlled trials and real-world evidence before approving future vaccines—a stark contrast to the corrupt "Warp Speed" debacle that prioritized Big Pharma profits over public health.
The end of medical coercion—a win for parents and freedom
This policy shift is a direct result of relentless pressure from medical freedom advocates, parents and courageous doctors like Dr. Peter McCullough, who exposed the fraudulent narrative that children needed COVID-19 vaccines. With only 13% of children and 14% of pregnant women opting for the latest booster, the American people have voted with their feet, rejecting fearmongering in favor of common sense.
The era of medical authoritarianism is crumbling. No longer will parents be bullied into injecting their children with unnecessary, risky vaccines. No longer will pregnant women be guilt-tripped into accepting experimental medical products without proper long-term safety data.
What’s next? The fight for accountability
While this is a historic victory, the battle is far from over. Big Pharma and their captured regulators will not give up their power easily. The next steps must include:
• Full investigations into fraudulent clinical trials and censorship of vaccine injuries.
• Legal action against those who lied to the public and violated informed consent.
• Permanent bans on childhood COVID-19 vaccine mandates in schools and healthcare settings.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
New study links mRNA vaccines to long-term thyroid risks, igniting safety debate
A groundbreaking study of over 2.3 million patients has found that recipients of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines face a significantly higher risk of developing thyroid disease than unvaccinated individuals, raising urgent questions about the lasting health consequences of pandemic-era shots. Published in January 2024 but only recently highlighted by researchers, the analysis—led by scientists at National Taiwan University—reveals that vaccinated individuals were 30% likelier to be diagnosed with thyroid disorders a year later, with over 4,000 extra cases of hypothyroidism alone in the study group. Even more striking, people who received only one dose of an mRNA vaccine had nearly double the risk of hypothyroidism compared to unvaccinated peers. These findings add urgency to ongoing debates about the long-term safety of mRNA technology amid a growing body of research linking vaccines to autoimmune conditions, including myocarditis and hepatitis.
The study’s key findings: A statistical wake-up call
The Taiwanese researchers used the TriNetX medical records database, covering 116 million patients, to track outcomes for 1.16 million vaccinated individuals and an equal number of unvaccinated, medically matched controls from January 2022 to December 2023. The results were stark:
• Hypothyroidism risks: Over 4,000 extra cases of hypothyroidism were observed in the vaccinated group after one year, with hazard ratios (a measure of relative risk) ranging from 1.14 to 1.30 for the condition. The gap between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients widened steadily over time.
• Hyperthyroidism paradox: While vaccinated individuals initially showed reduced hyperthyroidism rates between 3–9 months post-vaccination, this trend faded by 12 months, suggesting transient suppression followed by later complications. Among mRNA recipients specifically, hyperthyroidism risks also rose at 12 months, indicating further complexity.
• Single-dose subgroup: Those who received only one mRNA dose faced the highest risks, with hypothyroidism cases doubling and hyperthyroidism increasing by 25%. This finding may reflect heightened immune responses in persons less likely to tolerate multiple injections.
Lead author Dr. Chen-Min Liang, a thyroid specialist at National Taiwan University, emphasized the statistical rigor of the study: “Our sample size and matching protocols minimized confounding factors. These risks are unlikely coincidental.” The study also compared outcomes for recipients of the lesser-studied Johnson & Johnson (Ad26) vaccine, which did not correlate with elevated thyroid risks, strengthening suspicions about mRNA-specific mechanisms.
Autoimmune concerns and broader implications
The thyroid’s role in regulating metabolism makes even moderate dysfunction a hidden health drain, sapping energy and contributing to weight gain, high cholesterol and cardiovascular stress. The study’s authors note that mRNA vaccines, which instruct immune cells to produce SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins, may trigger autoimmune reactions — where the immune system mistakenly targets bodily tissues — such as those seen in multiple sclerosis, Type 1 diabetes and hypothyroidism.
This thyroid data follows years of scattered reports associating mRNA shots with autoimmune hepatitis, myocarditis and rare neurological disorders. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), for instance, has acknowledged a “high verification rate” of myocarditis cases after mRNA vaccinations, with higher risks noted for adolescents and young adults. Such harms, critics argue, justify closer scrutiny of population-level post-vaccination outcomes.
Dr. Patricia Fitzgerald, an immunologist at the University of California, San Francisco, who was not involved in the study, noted: “The thyroid is a classic target in autoimmune disorders. If mRNA mechanisms prime the immune system to cross-react with thyroid tissue, that’s a red flag for chronic health impacts.”
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
This policy shift is a victory for medical transparency, but the battle is far from over. The FDA still allows toxic adjuvants like aluminum in vaccines and has yet to address the carcinogenic chemicals lurking in childhood immunizations. Meanwhile, states like California continue stripping parents of medical rights, denying them access to their children’s vaccine records after age 12.
As RFK Jr. takes the helm at HHS, dismantling the corruption entrenched in public health agencies, this FDA decision signals a long-overdue return to evidence-based medicine. But true reform requires more than half-measures—it demands an end to the profit-driven vaccine mandates that have harmed a generation, and a full revoke of license for disastrous COVID-19 vaccines, failed flu vaccines, among other untested medical experiments.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Medical authorities claim these injections are "safe and effective," yet no long-term safety studies exist proving the cumulative effects of multiple vaccines on infants. Worse, the CDC’s own data reveals that babies receive more aluminum in their first six months than what’s deemed safe for adults—a fact buried beneath layers of bureaucratic deceit.
McKinley and her family are now advocating for greater awareness of potential risks. “We just want answers,” she said. “No parent should have to go through this.”
The SIDS smokescreen: How vaccines are erased from autopsy reports
When infants die shortly after vaccination, the system swiftly labels their deaths as SIDS—a diagnosis of exclusion that requires no evidence, no accountability, and no justice. As Blessings’ parents discovered, even when autopsy samples show signs of an adverse reaction, medical examiners are trained to ignore the obvious.
A former police detective, speaking to investigator Steve Kirsch, confirmed this systemic fraud: half of SIDS cases she examined involved recent vaccinations, yet coroners never listed vaccines on death certificates. This deliberate omission protects the vaccine industry while leaving parents like McKinley and Simmons to suffer in silence.
When the clinic finally admitted Blessings’ death was likely vaccine-related, they directed her parents to the VICP—a rigged system where only a fraction of claims are paid out. Created in 1986 after vaccine manufacturers threatened to abandon childhood immunizations due to lawsuits, the VICP has paid over $5 billion to victims—yet most families face years of delays, denials, and legal roadblocks.
McKinley’s attempt to find legal representation was met with cowardice: a lawyer initially willing to subpoena autopsy evidence later backed down, claiming the samples were "insufficient." The message is clear: the system is designed to protect itself, not the children it kills.
McKinley’s plea to the public is simple: "Don’t let your loved ones become a statistic of Pharma." As more parents awaken to the dangers of coercive vaccination, the fight for medical freedom—and for justice for children like Blessings—grows louder. The question remains: How many more babies must die before the world listens and vulnerable babies are no longer poisoned with multiple doses of poison?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
No apologies, no accountability—just more power grabs
Health Minister Mark Butler’s response to calls for accountability? A flat "No." When asked if leaders should apologize for lockdowns, Butler defiantly praised their "courageous decisions" and pushed for a new CDC-style agency to centralize power further.
Meanwhile, senators like Matthew Canavan and Ralph Babet are fighting for a real investigation. "The worst decisions were made by unelected bureaucrats responsible for death, destruction, and financial ruin," Babet said. But their bill for a Royal Commission was narrowly defeated—proof that the political elite fears the truth.
Australia’s COVID Inquiry wasn’t just a betrayal—it was a warning. The same forces that locked down nations, mandated experimental drugs, and silenced critics are now rewriting history to justify doing it all again. The only way to stop them is to demand real accountability: open hearings, subpoenaed testimony, and criminal consequences for those who abused their power.
As Foster warned: "Trust won’t be restored until the people in power are gone." The question is: Will Australians let them get away with it?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Top FDA official reveals she didn’t get the COVID-19 injection
A high-ranking official of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official has revealed that she never received a Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine due to concerns about how the shots distribute in the body – particularly their potential effects on pregnancy and breastfeeding.
FDA Principal Deputy Commissioner Dr. Sara Brenner made this striking admission Thursday, May 15, during an event in Washington, D.C. organized by the newly formed MAHA Institute. The group, named after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Make America Healthy Again agenda, advocates for health policy reform.
Brenner, a preventive medicine specialist with expertise in nanotechnology, explained that she was pregnant during the pandemic. At the time, she hesitated to take the vaccines because the manner of how they spread through the body was not yet fully understood.
"It was unknown at the time what the biodistribution patterns of those products were, and in my case, in particular, what the excretion would be in breast milk," she said. "That was my primary concern."
Subsequent research appears to validate Brenner's caution. A 2022 study detected mRNA from Pfizer and Moderna vaccines in breast milk, and another paper published the following year reinforced those findings.
COVID-19 policies failed public trust
The timing of Brenner's comments is notable, as a health official confirmed to the Epoch Times that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will no longer advise routine COVID-19 vaccinations for youth and pregnant women. This reversal from its previous stance follows growing scrutiny over vaccine mandates and the sidelining of dissenting voices within federal health agencies.
Incumbent FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary has publicly criticized COVID-19 booster recommendations, though he received the initial vaccine series. Brenner served as acting FDA commissioner pending Makary's confirmation by the Senate.
Her remarks also highlight a broader tension within the FDA and the CDC, where some officials have privately questioned the rapid push for mass vaccination without long-term safety data. They ultimately underscore the lack of transparency that plagued pandemic policy.
"One of the biggest misses … was that there was no acknowledgement of what was unknown," said Brenner. "There were only statements and assertions that were really more like beliefs or things that were desired to be true than they were true knowns."
Brenner, who served in both the Trump and Biden administrations, described the past few years as a "dark time." However, she expressed optimism under new leadership – including Kennedy at the Department of Health and Human Services, who has championed vaccine safety reforms.
As the FDA navigates these changes, Brenner emphasized that rebuilding public trust requires honesty about uncertainties in medicine. With over 80 percent of Americans having received at least one COVID-19 shot, her candid remarks may prompt deeper questions about how pandemic policies were shaped – and who was allowed to ask them.
Watch Del Bigtree discussing FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary's demands for real vaccine trials in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/26d5a27d-e0ba-431b-ac19-a29f7a52fcea
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
New study links children’s COVID vaccines to autoimmune risks as HHS halts routine recommendations
A groundbreaking study published in Pediatric Rheumatology has found that children and adolescents who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine face a 23% higher risk of developing autoimmune diseases compared to unvaccinated peers. Conducted by Israeli researchers using data from nearly 500,000 patients, the study—released in early 2025—highlights growing concerns about long-term vaccine safety amid surging debates over public health policy.
Simultaneously, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has announced plans to stop recommending routine administration of the vaccines to children and pregnant women, a shift rooted in disputed safety data and increasing advocacy by health freedom groups. The findings, paired with the policy decision, underscore escalating tensions over vaccine mandates and the balance between public health and individual autonomy.
Study finds elevated autoimmune risks in vaccinated children
The peer-reviewed study, led by researchers at Israel’s Maccabi Healthcare Services, analyzed data from 493,705 participants aged 1 to 21 between 2014 and 2022. The results revealed a statistically significant hazard ratio of 1.2323 for vaccinated individuals, corresponding to a 23.2% increased risk of developing autoimmune diseases—including Type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and Guillain-Barré syndrome—when compared to unvaccinated groups. The risk appeared most pronounced 8.74 months post-vaccination, a timeframe longer than the expected persistence of vaccine-derived spike proteins.
Crucially, unvaccinated children who contracted SARS-CoV-2 showed no heightened autoimmune risk, a distinction emphasized by the authors. Dr. Michelle Perro, a pediatrician and contributor to The Defender, praised the study’s “methodologically robust” design, noting the inclusion of adolescents up to age 21—a group particularly vulnerable to autoimmune conditions due to their developing immune systems. However, she criticized the accelerated rollout of pediatric vaccines under Operation Warp Speed, which bypassed standard 10- to 15-year trial timelines. “Children were not adequately studied before the rollout, and we’re now seeing the consequences,” she stated.
Scientific consensus or controversy? Broader research context
The Israeli findings align with a growing body of research questioning vaccine safety. A recent German study in Molecular Systems Biology linked mRNA vaccines to genetic changes that could trigger autoimmune disorders and cancer. Additionally, a Yale-led preprint noted elevated cytokine levels—a marker of immune dysfunction—in vaccinated individuals, while a meta-analysis in Immunity, Inflammation and Disease identified increased risks of thyroid-related autoimmune diseases.
Many experts attribute these effects to spike protein persistence, which may provoke molecular mimicry—a mechanism where viral proteins trick the immune system into attacking human cells—or “bystander activation,” where immune cells mistakenly target self-antigens. Karl Jablonowski, senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense, warned that autoimmunity treatment remains “extremely challenging,” with limited medical or holistic solutions.
Clinical observations also corroborate these trends. Dr. Margaret Christensen of the Carpathia Collaborative reported a surge in autoimmune diagnoses among childhood vaccine recipients in her practice, stating: “The correlation is impossible to ignore.”
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Vax-injured man confesses to “anti-vaxxers”: “You won” – but humanity hasn’t “won” until the perpetrators are brought to justice
In a world where dissent was silenced and skepticism was branded as conspiracy, those who resisted the COVID-19 vaccine mandates are now being vindicated in the most tragic of ways. A man, stricken with cancer after submitting to the experimental mRNA injections, delivers a raw and unfiltered confession: "The anti-vaxx people appear to be the winners... You won. You win completely." His words cut through the propaganda like a knife, exposing the devastating consequences of blind trust in corrupt institutions. As the truth unfolds, it becomes clear that the unvaccinated — those who refused to be part of a global medical experiment — are not just survivors but the true victors in a war waged against bodily autonomy and informed consent.
However, the war is far from over. Those who complied with the medical tyranny and those who did not must now unite and band together to bring the perpetrators behind this man-made hell to justice.
Key points:
• A man suffering from vaccine-induced cancer admits the unvaccinated "won" by avoiding the shots and relying on natural immunity.
• The COVID vaccine campaign, pushed by governments and corporations, has led to widespread injury while failing to stop transmission.
• Distrust of Big Pharma and authoritarian mandates was not conspiracy—it was common sense, now validated by real-world outcomes.
• The unvaccinated, once vilified, now hold the "winning position" with stronger immunity and no long-term injection risks.
• Justice must be pursued against those who enforced medical coercion and lied about vaccine safety.
The confession: A reckoning for the vaccinated
The man’s emotional statement — "I did not end up in the right place. The right place would be natural immunity, no vaccination" — is a damning indictment of the covid narrative. His words echo thousands of similar testimonies from those injured by the shots, many now battling sudden cancers, heart conditions and autoimmune disorders. Meanwhile, the unvaccinated, who endured discrimination and censorship, emerged unscathed, their natural immunity proving more durable than the rapidly waning protection of the jabs.
This reality dismantles the core argument of mandate pushers: that refusing vaccination was "selfish" or "dangerous." In truth, the vaccinated spread the virus just as easily, while the unvaccinated faced brutal segregation — losing jobs, education and basic freedoms — for refusing an ineffective and risky medical experiment.
Distrusting Big Pharma and Big Government was never wrong
"It's never wrong to distrust government. It's never wrong to distrust big companies," the man admits. His words affirm what independent journalists and medical freedom advocates have long argued: Blind faith in institutions with histories of corruption — like the CDC, FDA and Pfizer — was never justified. From the opioid crisis to the suppression of ivermectin, these entities have repeatedly prioritized profit over public health.
The COVID vaccines, rushed to market with no long-term safety data, followed the same pattern. Yet those who questioned the narrative were smeared as "anti-science," despite decades of pharmaceutical malfeasance proving their skepticism valid. Now, with myocarditis rates soaring and excess deaths spiking in heavily vaccinated nations, the truth can no longer be suppressed.
Uniting for justice is essential to ensure this never happens again
The man’s plea — "You should take victory and I should take defeat" — is not just an admission of error but a call to action. The vaccinated and unvaccinated must unite to hold accountable the architects of this medical tyranny: the politicians who enforced mandates, the media that silenced dissent, and the corporations that profited from fear.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Silent epidemic: UK heart health collapses as vaccine injuries, fear, and government negligence fuel unprecedented crisis
The heart health of the British public is in free fall—and the very institutions meant to protect it are complicit in its destruction. A damning report from the British Heart Foundation (BHF) reveals that cardiovascular deaths among working-age adults have surged by 18% since 2019, marking the worst decline in half a century. But while the BHF tepidly blames "lifestyle factors" and an "unhealthy population," the real culprits—government-mandated bioterror, experimental vaccines, and the psychological warfare of pandemic fear—are being swept under the rug. The data doesn’t lie: heart failure diagnoses have skyrocketed by 21%, atrial fibrillation by 10%, and diabetes by 12%. Meanwhile, cardiac waiting lists have exploded by 83%, leaving hundreds of thousands stranded without care. This isn’t just a health crisis—it’s a betrayal.
Key points:
• Cardiovascular deaths in UK working-age adults surged 18% since 2019, with 21,975 deaths in 2023 alone—averaging 420 lives lost weekly.
• Heart failure diagnoses rose 21%, atrial fibrillation 10%, and diabetes 12%—all major risk factors for cardiac events.
• Cardiac waiting lists in England jumped 83%, exposing a collapsing healthcare system.
• BHF ignores the elephant in the room: Covid vaccines, known to cause myocarditis, pericarditis, and sudden cardiac arrest.
• Statistical anomalies are catastrophic: Cardiovascular deaths in 2022 were 10.5 standard deviations above historical trends—a near-impossible deviation signaling systemic harm.
The vaccine time bomb: A statistical nightmare
When independent researchers analyzed UK cardiovascular mortality data, the numbers defied natural explanation. Cardiovascular deaths, which had been steadily declining for decades, spiked 13% in 2020, 30% in 2021, and 44% in 2022. By statistical standards, this isn’t just alarming—it’s apocalyptic. A 10.5 standard deviation event is so rare that it should occur once in several billion years under normal conditions. Yet regulators and health authorities continue to dismiss the obvious: the experimental mRNA vaccines are destroying hearts.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a leading cardiologist, warns: "One of the most alarming aspects of the pandemic, for me as a cardiologist, is seeing young people develop heart failure as a result of Covid-19 vaccine myopericarditis." The evidence was there from the start. In an October 2020 FDA meeting, officials admitted that the vaccines could cause blood clots and heart damage—yet they pushed them anyway. Now, athletes collapse on fields, teenagers suffer cardiac arrests, and middle-aged adults drop dead without warning. The BHF’s refusal to address this medical genocide is nothing short of criminal.
Fear, masks, and metabolic collapse: The hidden killers
While the BHF blames "obesity" and "unhealthy lifestyles," they ignore the psychological and physiological torture inflicted by lockdowns, mask mandates, and perpetual fear. Chronic stress—whether from economic ruin, isolation, or forced masking—directly damages the cardiovascular system. Studies show that prolonged oxygen deprivation from masks increases cardiac strain, while paranoia and anxiety trigger inflammation and arterial damage.
Then there’s the junk food crisis. Trapped indoors, deprived of normalcy, millions turned to processed foods, sugar, and alcohol to cope—fueling diabetes and obesity. But this wasn’t an accident. It was by design. Governments shut down gyms while keeping fast-food chains open. They terrified people into sedentary lives while ignoring the deadly consequences of metabolic dysfunction.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
While the NEJM study reported mild side effects, real-world data tells a darker story:
• Myocarditis & pericarditis – Australia documented 19.4 cases per 100,000 doses, with chest pain occurring at 91.3 per 100,000 doses.
• Anaphylaxis – Seven cases (all in women) emerged post-approval, despite zero cases in clinical trials.
• Menstrual disturbances – Women reported sudden, severe changes in their cycles—a phenomenon ignored in trials.
• Deaths – Four fatalities were dismissed without investigation, despite occurring shortly after vaccination.
Instead of convening an independent advisory committee to scrutinize these risks, the FDA fast-tracked approval, claiming the data "did not raise concerns." Yet, buried in the fine print, the agency mandated post-approval studies on myocarditis, strokes, and pregnancy outcomes—due between 2027 and 2032.
This means millions of people are being used as guinea pigs while regulators wait a decade to confirm if the vaccine is safe. Novavax’s vaccine is not the "natural" alternative it’s marketed as. It’s a genetically engineered, insect-cell-derived product with serious post-market risks and no long-term safety data. The FDA’s approval is a betrayal of public trust, prioritizing corporate profits over informed consent.
The question isn’t whether Novavax works — it’s whether anyone truly knows the long-term cost.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
HHS to stop recommending routine COVID-19 injections for kids and pregnant women
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is preparing to halt its blanket recommendation that pregnant women, children and teenagers routinely receive Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, according to a Wall Street Journal report Thursday, May 15.
The move marks a significant reversal of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) policy, which has urged vaccination for all individuals six months and older since 2021. It follows years of mounting evidence linking the shots to severe injuries, including myocarditis, fertility issues and fetal harm. Nevertheless, the reports of vaccine damage raise urgent questions about why federal agencies delayed action despite early warnings.
If confirmed, the decision would align with long-standing criticisms from medical experts and advocacy groups, who argue that the risks of mRNA vaccines outweigh the benefits for young, healthy populations. CDC data shows only 13 percent of children and 14 percent of pregnant women have received the latest booster, reflecting widespread public skepticism.
Health freedom advocates dubbed the policy change overdue. "CHD has opposed the COVID-19 shot recommendation for children since the beginning," said Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland.
Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough @P_McCulloughMD, a vocal critic of the vaccines, noted that it took "two presidents, three HHS secretaries and three FDA [Food and Drug Administration] commissioners" for the vaccine guidance to be reversed. He added: "After record vaccine injuries, disabilities and death, America is wondering: Will any of these leaders be held accountable?"
HHS's 180-degree turn comes as public trust in COVID-19 shots erodes
The agency's anticipated pivot comes as 11 states push legislative bans on COVID-19 vaccines. Meanwhile, criminal investigations in seven states target officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci for alleged misconduct during the pandemic.
Internal Pfizer documents analyzed by the Daily Clout, revealed the shots' links to miscarriages and heart damage in minors as early as 2021. Yet the CDC continued promoting them for pregnancy, and its advisory committees unanimously added COVID-19 vaccines to the childhood immunization schedule in 2023 – despite their emergency-use-only status for children under 12.
Pediatrician Dr. Michelle Perro warned that mRNA vaccines contain "undetermined DNA fragments" with potential genetic risks. Journalist and Daily Clout founder Naomi Wolf meanwhile emphasized that the shots "never stopped COVID in the first place."
The reported policy shift reflects a broader reckoning over pandemic-era mandates. With an estimated 600,000 U.S. deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines – surpassing combined American casualties in major 20th-century wars – public trust in health agencies has eroded.
Meanwhile, medical groups like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) still endorse vaccination for pregnant women. While the ACOG continues to cite elevated risks of severe infection to justify its position, that stance may now face scrutiny.
While the CDC's expected reversal is a step toward accountability, advocates demand further action. They call for pulling the vaccines from the market, revoking liability shields for manufacturers and prosecuting officials who enabled what McCullough calls "the disastrous COVID-19 vaccine debacle."
Watch Dr. Jim Thorp exposing how the CDC concealed the huge infant mortality rate for the COVID-19 injections in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/ac4a957d-e5b0-42fa-af9f-3bb0d82a5976
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Another “Conspiracy Theory” PROVEN TRUE about mRNA CLOT SHOTS reveals tricked human cells keep producing DEADLY SPIKE PRIONS indefinitely
We called it at the beginning, when Big Pharma and the CDC were lying through their teeth, claiming that the mRNA “technology” would only have your cells create spike proteins for a short amount of time, just long enough for your immune system to create antibodies, and then end the production of the virus-mimicking prions. Big fat lie.
First off, the prions don’t just remain at the site of injection. That was a lie. The spike protein prions spread throughout the vascular system, invade the cleansing organs, the brain and the ovaries, and use light to join together to form white, rubbery clots that drive all-cause mortality rates to skyrocket.
Clot shots altered the injected humanoids to be walking prion factories who are dying of all-cause mortality that all boils back to the mRNA Trojan Horse “technology”
Millions of nanoparticles are created by tricked cells for indefinite periods of time, possibly forever, and the injected humanoids around the globe are suffering mass health detriment. That’s right, Moderna and Pfizer clot shots hijack the immune cells, rewrite your DNA and RNA, and prolong spike protein prion production POSSIBLY FOREVER, in the shortened life of the billions of gene-altered humans who succumbed to the plandemic scam. What a shame.
A groundbreaking study published in Nature has upended long-standing assurances from health authorities that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines quickly degrade in the body. Instead, the research reveals that Pfizer and Moderna shots reprogram immune cells to extend their genetic instructions, forcing prolonged spike protein production — contrary to official claims that effects would last only "a few weeks." The findings, led by Polish researchers (Krawczyk et al., 2025), expose a hidden mechanism that could have serious long-term health implications, raising urgent questions about safety, transparency, and regulatory oversight.
The study found that immune cells, particularly macrophages, activate an enzyme called TENT5A in response to mRNA vaccines. This enzyme rewrites the vaccine’s genetic code, doubling the length of its poly(A) tail — a molecular timer that determines how long mRNA survives. In some cases, Moderna’s mRNA tail extended from 100 to 200 nucleotides, drastically prolonging spike protein production.
"This wasn’t just persistence—it was amplification," said Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist and vaccine safety advocate. "The body is essentially tricked into editing the shot’s instructions to make it last longer. This was never part of the clinical trials."
Public health officials, including CDC advisor Dr. Paul Offit, previously asserted that spike protein production would last only "a couple of weeks." Yet studies have since detected spike protein in blood samples for up to 709 days post-injection. Moderna’s own 2024 internal documents acknowledged "unacceptable toxicity" risks, yet regulators fast-tracked the shots without addressing these concerns.
Molecular biologist Dr. Jessica Rose likened the process to "giving someone a self-replicating memo. The memo was supposed to be read once and discarded. Instead, the recipient photocopies it endlessly."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
While past presidents, including Trump, have used autopens for routine documents, Biden’s team allegedly deployed it for legally consequential actions, including pardons for political allies like Adam Schiff and Liz Cheney. A Heritage Foundation analysis confirmed the blanket clemency grants were autopen-signed, raising legal and ethical red flags.
The autopen scandal is more than a bureaucratic controversy; it’s a glaring indictment of an administration that prioritized secrecy over accountability. As Comer’s investigation advances, Americans deserve answers about who wielded presidential authority while Biden’s mental acuity faltered. The truth, long suppressed by a complicit media and political establishment, is finally coming to light. And for those who participated in this deception, subpoenas—and perhaps legal consequences—await.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
WEAPONIZED EBOLA AND MARBURG VIRUSES may have leaked from Maryland’s Fort Detrick DHS lab when two scientist lovers had violent argument
The US government is hard at work creating the next pandemic in aerosol form from the deadliest viruses on planet Earth. Two idiot scientists had a romantic spat at the Ft. Detrick lab and one of them poked a hole in other one’s hazmat suit, likely exposes the victim and helping to “accidentally” release the next bioweapon of terror as an aerosolized, genetically mutated version of Ebola (EBOV) or Marburg (MARV) virus.
Yes, the Department of Homeland Insecurity is working hard to royally screw up the planet by creating recombination genomes of strains of deadly Ebola and Marburg viruses and testing them in rats and monkeys in a biolab near Frederick, Maryland. What could possibly go wrong?
Biolab workers really “screwed up” this time while having a relationship fight in the most dangerous bioweapons lab on the planet, right here on US soil
Filoviruses like Ebola and Marburg are classified as Category A bioterrorism agents by the CDC due to their high lethality and potential for mass casualties. Research into aerosol transmission—meant to develop countermeasures—has also raised concerns about dual-use risks. A 2012 study at Fort Detrick successfully modified mice to be susceptible to airborne Ebola, a step critics argue could enable weaponization.
“I am told in public records that they are doing experiments or have done experiments to aerosolize Ebola at the Impact lab, that’s the DHS lab nearby Fort Detrick,” Sen. Paul said during a Senate hearing. “The idea of aerosolizing Ebola… is incredibly dangerous and probably goes against the Biological Weapons Convention.”
Recent revelations about U.S. biolabs experimenting with aerosolized Ebola have raised alarms among scientists and policymakers. The debate centers on whether such research, conducted at facilities like Fort Detrick and the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Impact Lab, poses an unacceptable risk of accidental—or intentional—release.
The discussion gained traction after Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) questioned officials about unreported safety breaches, including an alleged incident where a jilted lab worker sabotaged a colleague’s hazmat suit during a study on weaponized Ebola.
The Senate hearing also exposed troubling lapses in biolab oversight. An anonymous HHS source revealed an incident where a researcher allegedly punctured a colleague’s protective gear during a personal dispute while working with Ebola. Dr. Connie Schmaljohn, the lab director, reportedly failed to report the breach, raising questions about accountability. Talk about domestic terrorism. Our own government is engaging in it and pretending like it’s just another day at the lab.
Data from the past decade shows hundreds of accidental pathogen releases in U.S. labs, including anthrax, tuberculosis, and Ebola. Between 2014 and 2022, over 600 such incidents were recorded, with at least two workers infected—though no deaths were reported.
While research on deadly pathogens is critical for medical preparedness, the lack of transparency and recurring safety failures fuel fears of catastrophic accidents—or worse, intentional misuse. As global tensions rise, the ethical and security implications of aerosolizing Ebola demand urgent scrutiny. Whether for defense or disaster, the line between protection and peril remains perilously thin.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Canada’s top health officials forced to sign oath concealing Trudeau’s COVID-19 failures
Newly-uncovered records show that Canada's Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam, along with dozens of senior government officials, signed a secret oath preventing them from disclosing information related to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) that could be detrimental to former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
According to the pledge obtained through Access to Information requests, at least 29 high ranking officials across multiple federal departments – including Tam herself – were bound by this confidentiality agreement. The oath raises serious concerns about transparency during one of the most critical public health crises in modern history.
The signed agreement explicitly warned against unauthorized disclosures that could lead to "embarrassment, criticism, or claims against Canada." It also threatened damage to supplier relations – a clear reference to the government's dealings with vaccine manufacturers. The oath's timing came as Ottawa inked multi-billion-dollar vaccine contracts with pharmaceutical giants.
Moreover, the oath forced officials to adhere to the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector – a document meant to ensure integrity. But in this case, it appears to have been weaponized to suppress dissent.
Ultimately, the pledge signed by Tam and other officials suggests a deliberate effort to shield decision-making from public scrutiny. Critics argued this was less about protecting national security and more about avoiding accountability.
Canadian taxpayers foot the bill for vaccine injuries
The Trudeau government committed over $8 billion to COVID-19 vaccine contracts with companies like Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca. Notably, these deals included liability protections for manufacturers, meaning Canadian taxpayers – not the pharmaceutical firms – would cover the cost of any vaccine injuries.
This arrangement led to the creation of Canada's Vaccine Injury Support Program, which is now facing budget overruns due to mounting injury claims. Meanwhile, the government continues purchasing vaccines despite plummeting public demand – a decision that defies both fiscal and medical logic.
Statistics Canada reports show a rise in deaths from both COVID-19 and unspecified causes following the vaccine rollout. While correlation does not equal causation, the data has fueled skepticism about the safety of the shots, particularly among younger demographics.
Independent investigations have linked mRNA vaccines to severe side effects, including heart inflammation and blood clots. Additionally, ethical concerns persist over the use of abortion-derived cell lines in vaccine development.
The revelation of this secret oath underscores a disturbing pattern of opacity in Canada's pandemic response. Instead of fostering open dialogue, the Trudeau government chose to muzzle its own experts – prioritizing political image over public trust.
As Canadians grapple with the long-term consequences of rushed policies, one thing is clear: True accountability will only come when all suppressed information sees the light of day. Until then, the question remains: What else are they hiding?
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree discussing Justin Trudeau's resignation as Canadian prime minister in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/10b8f3bd-5012-4f2d-a660-f400f7f780bc
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Mercury in flu shots: A silent threat to unborn babies
The CDC insists flu shots are essential for pregnant women—but fails to disclose that multi-dose vials contain thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative. Mercury is a known neurotoxin that crosses the placental barrier, yet the CDC’s flu vaccine webpage omits this critical risk. The failure of annual flu shots equates to false assurances for pregnant women, leading many to succumb to doctor pressure to inoculate with poisonous mercury based vaccines that can damage the entire developmental process of their baby.
Eileen Dannemann, director of the National Coalition of Organized Women, revealed that between 2009 and 2010, mercury-laden flu vaccines spiked fetal death reports by 4,250% in VAERS. Despite this, the CDC still pushes the shots as "safe."
Post-marketing data links flu vaccines to 10 nervous system disorders, including Guillain-Barré syndrome and encephalopathy. A 2017 study even found a higher miscarriage rate among vaccinated women. Yet, the CDC buries these findings, instead citing cherry-picked studies that downplay risks.
RSV and Tdap: Profit over protection
Pfizer’s RSV vaccine, Abrysvo, costs over $300 per dose and may increase preterm births. Dr. Vinay Prasad, the FDA’s new vaccine regulator, admitted: "I have no confidence this vaccine is a net positive."
Meanwhile, the Tdap vaccine contains aluminum, a neurotoxin linked to various forms of brain damage that precede autism diagnoses. Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., warns: "Aluminum exposure of a pregnant mother is inexcusable." Yet, the CDC mandates it in the third trimester, ignoring the potential for lifelong harm.
The CDC’s vaccine recommendations for pregnant women are not based on sound science—they’re driven by corporate interests and bureaucratic inertia. With mounting evidence of fetal harm, it’s time to demand accountability, and a complete removal of vaccine licenses for pregnant women and their babies. Pregnant women deserve real informed consent, not coercion into risky medical interventions that damage their child's brain.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia