16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
Segregated by shots: How vaccine mandates push unvaccinated teens to the brink of suicide
In the name of "public health," schools across America are waging a silent war against unvaccinated students—forcing medically exempt children out of classrooms, stripping them of social connections, and pushing many to the edge of despair. While bureaucrats hide behind flawed science and fearmongering, evidence mounts that these exclusionary policies are fueling a mental health crisis among teens, with suicide rates skyrocketing in districts that punish students for their vaccination status. This isn’t just about vaccines—it’s about a system of bullying and mass compliance that trades children’s lives and mental well-being to appease an industry that thrives on control, abuse, false guilt, and false narratives about health.
Key points:
• Schools are barring students with medical exemptions from attending class, despite no evidence they pose a greater health risk than vaccinated peers.
• These acts of segregation are rooted in lies and false guilt, wrongfully punishing students who pose no threat to their peers.
• Experts warn these policies mirror disciplinary suspensions, isolating teens and increasing depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation.
• Youth suicides spiked during COVID-era school closures, yet administrators ignore the psychological toll of vaccine segregation.
• Legal battles expose how states like New York revoke valid medical exemptions, violating federal disability and education rights.
• Rigid mandates force vulnerable kids to choose between vaccine injury or losing access to education—a cruel and unconstitutional ultimatum.
• The mandates also pit kids against their parents, as school systems and their administrators believe they are in control over private medical decisions of families.
The hidden toll of vaccine segregation
Karl Kanthak, a researcher and expert witness in vaccine exemption lawsuits, describes school policies as "reckless," noting that administrators "have no idea what the student’s mental status is" when they exile them from campus. Functionally, he argues, these exclusions are "identical to a disciplinary suspension or expulsion—if not worse," since the student committed no offense. The parallels are chilling: Studies show school suspensions correlate with higher self-harm rates, and CDC data confirms exclusionary policies amplify depression. Yet, while Sweden’s decision to keep schools open saw youth suicides decline, U.S. districts doubled down on punitive measures—with tragic results.
In Nevada’s Clark County, 18 students took their own lives during pandemic lockdowns, prompting schools to reopen. But the damage was done. Meanwhile, Washington State officials dodged questions about whether they consulted mental health experts before enacting vaccine exclusion rules. "Everyone’s afraid of questioning vaccines," Kanthak said, "because you’ll be labeled anti-vax."
Medical exemptions under attack
New York attorney Sujata Gibson has witnessed firsthand how revoking medical exemptions destroys families. "Medically fragile kids are forced into impossible choices—like risking vaccine injury or losing education," she said. One client, Sarah Doe, was barred from school despite seven doctors affirming her exemption due to severe health risks. Once a star athlete, she now battles depression and rarely leaves bed. "The state is intentionally removing protective factors," Kanthak added, "without warning parents of the danger."
New York’s 2019 elimination of religious exemptions was justified as protecting medically vulnerable students. Instead, the state now rejects valid exemptions—a bait-and-switch that Gibson calls "reckless." Children’s Health Defense is fighting back with lawsuits, arguing such policies violate the Americans with Disabilities Act. "Denying education to these kids isn’t just cruel," Gibson said. "It’s illegal."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The parallels are undeniable: governments worldwide enacted protocols that turned hospitals into death chambers, all while suppressing early treatments that could have saved lives. Many inner city hospitals are typically at capacity in the winter months; this was a problem long before the COVID scandal drew loads of frightened individuals into the hospital to be denied proper treatment.
The Schara family’s lawsuit represents a rare legal challenge to these atrocities. By charging medical battery—administering unauthorized drugs—they aim to bypass the PREP Act, which grants blanket immunity to hospitals and doctors for COVID-related "care."
Meanwhile, doctors like Bowden, Peter McCullough, and Robert Malone continue fighting against a medical-industrial complex that prioritizes profits over lives. As Bowden noted, "If the covid vaccine had been any other drug, it would have been pulled by now."
The truth of the COVID-19 scandal and medical tyranny is emerging, piece by horrifying piece.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
DIABETES SHOCKER: Massive META-ANALYSIS reveals sugary DRINKS cause more cases of TYPE 2 DIABETES than sugar-loaded foods
Everyone knows that sweets are the key catapult for type 2 diabetes, including baked goods like cakes, pies, brownies and cookies, but most people don’t focus much on beverages, besides soda, and that is a major problem. In fact, most fruit juices that boast on the labels about vitamins and minerals are LOADED up with added sugars, something that goes quite underrated as far as a major cause of type 2 diabetes. What to do?
• Fruit juices can be deceptive—Many boast vitamins but contain high added sugars, contributing to diabetes. African American women drinking 2+ sweetened juices daily had a 31% higher risk than those consuming minimal amounts.
• Sugary beverages are a major but overlooked diabetes risk—While sweets like cakes and cookies are recognized threats, drinks like soda and fruit juices (often marketed as "healthy") are loaded with added sugars, significantly increasing Type 2 diabetes risk.
• Daily sugary drinks raise diabetes risk by 25%—Studies show each extra 12-ounce soda daily increases risk by 25%, and even 8 ounces of fruit juice raises it by 5%. Liquid sugar lacks fiber/fat, causing rapid blood sugar spikes that harm metabolism.
• Whole foods are safer than liquids—Solid sugary foods slow absorption due to fiber/protein, but pairing soda with meals doesn’t negate long-term risks. Experts recommend water, infused drinks, or whole fruits instead of processed beverages.
Study Links Daily Sugary Drinks to 25% Higher Type 2 Diabetes Risk
A new meta-analysis of long-term studies suggests that drinking sugar-sweetened beverages—such as sodas, fruit juices, and energy drinks—raises the risk of Type 2 diabetes more than consuming sugary foods. The research, which analyzed data from over 500,000 healthy adults worldwide, found that each additional 12-ounce serving of soda per day increased diabetes risk by 25%, while an 8-ounce serving of fruit juice raised it by 5%.
“The findings highlight why drinking your sugar is more problematic for health than eating it,” said lead author Dr. Karen Della Corte, a nutritional science professor at Brigham Young University. Unlike solid foods, sugary drinks lack fiber, protein, or fat, leading to rapid absorption and sharp spikes in blood glucose and insulin—key factors in metabolic dysfunction.
The study, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, builds on earlier research, including a 2008 study that found African American women who drank two or more sodas daily had a 24% higher diabetes risk than those who consumed less than one per month. The latest analysis reinforces concerns about liquid sugar’s unique metabolic impact, particularly fructose-heavy sweeteners like high-fructose corn syrup.
Dr. Susan Spratt, a diabetes specialist at Duke Health (unaffiliated with the study), explained that food’s natural composition slows sugar absorption: “Higher amounts of fat and protein decrease stomach emptying, blunting the glycemic rise.” However, pairing soda with meals doesn’t eliminate the long-term risk, researchers caution.
Sugar consumption has evolved dramatically since the 20th century, with processed beverages becoming a dominant source. The rise of industrial sweeteners like high-fructose corn syrup in the 1970s correlates with soaring obesity and diabetes rates, prompting public health debates over regulation and corporate influence.
The study underscores the importance of reducing sugary drink intake. “Sugar isn’t inherently harmful,” said Della Corte, “but modern processed forms—especially liquids—disrupt metabolism.” Experts recommend water, infused beverages, or whole fruits as safer alternatives. As diabetes rates climb globally, the research adds urgency to rethinking dietary habits shaped by an era of ultra-processed foods.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Wisconsin defies CDC, keeps pushing COVID shots for pregnant women and kids despite safety concerns
In a bold departure from federal guidance, Wisconsin health officials are doubling down on their recommendation that pregnant women and children as young as six months receive COVID-19 vaccines, despite the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) abandoning its universal endorsement of the shots. The move has reignited debates over medical autonomy, informed consent, and the politicization of public health, as critics question whether the state’s stance is grounded in science or bureaucratic inertia.
While the CDC now advises individualized decisions for children and no longer pushes vaccines for pregnant women, Wisconsin insists the shots prevent severe illness and death. State officials cite an "independent review" of federal recommendations, though they provided no new clinical data to justify their position. Meanwhile, Florida’s health leaders applauded the CDC’s updated guidance, calling it a step toward evidence-based medicine in a striking contrast to Wisconsin’s unwavering support for an unproven vaccine strategy.
State doubles down as CDC shifts course
On June 4, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS) announced it would continue recommending COVID-19 vaccines for all residents aged six months and older, including pregnant women. Kirsten Johnson, the department’s secretary, declared the shots "an important tool in preventing severe illness and death," despite the CDC’s May decision to drop its blanket recommendation for these groups.
The CDC’s updated guidance now states that healthy children should only receive the vaccine after consultation with doctors and parents, emphasizing "informed consent through the clinical judgement of their healthcare provider." For pregnant women, the agency no longer advises vaccination in a reversal that Wisconsin officials dismissed, claiming the federal change was "not made based on new data, evidence, or scientific or medical studies."
Wisconsin’s defiance ignores critical unknowns. The current Pfizer, Moderna, and Novavax vaccines were approved in 2024 based on animal studies and antibody responses, not human clinical trials. CDC data presented in April showed modest protection but offered no long-term safety data for pregnant women or infants.
Florida praises CDC while Wisconsin digs in
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo hailed the CDC’s updated guidance as "an important advancement for parents, physicians, and children," adding that "scientific evidence dictates that the use of these products should end for all populations." His statement underscored a growing divide between states prioritizing medical freedom and those adhering to legacy pandemic policies.
Wisconsin, however, remains an outlier. The state’s Medicaid program will still cover the vaccine for pregnant women and children, despite the CDC’s retreat. When pressed for evidence supporting the shots’ efficacy, the Wisconsin DHS did not respond. Critics note that past recommendations for children lacked clinical data, as Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pointed out, calling prior mandates unscientific.
The American Pharmacists Association, meanwhile, broke ranks with the CDC, refusing to endorse the updated adult immunization schedule. The group claimed COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is "safe and effective," despite the CDC’s reversal in a contradiction that highlights the confusion permeating public health messaging.
CDC data shows only 14% of pregnant women have received the latest shot, reflecting widespread hesitancy. Patrick Remington, an emeritus professor at UW-Madison’s medical school, acknowledged the discord risks eroding public trust. "When you see disagreement between the federal government and experts, sometimes the public throws up their hands and says, 'If they can’t agree, I don’t believe anything,'" he said.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Secretary Kennedy purges ACIP – a necessary step toward restoring trust – but pledges to exclude “anti-vaxxers” from advisory panel
In a move that has sent shockwaves through the public health establishment, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has dismissed all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)—a panel long accused of rubber-stamping vaccines while ignoring safety concerns, financial conflicts, and the devastating reality of vaccine injuries. Kennedy’s bold decision, hailed by medical freedom advocates as a long-overdue reckoning, has drawn furious backlash from pharmaceutical-aligned groups who claim the purge will "endanger public health." But as parents of vaccine-injured children and independent scientists cheer the dismantling of a corrupt system, one critical question remains: Will Kennedy replace these industry-tied advisors with truly independent experts—or merely repopulate the panel with new faces beholden to the same profit-driven agenda and ideological status quo?
Key points:
• Kennedy’s removal of all ACIP members marks a historic challenge to the CDC’s vaccine approval process, which has never rejected a vaccine—even those later pulled for safety risks.
• Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland applauds the move, citing ACIP’s history of financial conflicts and lack of scrutiny for cumulative vaccine effects on children.
• Pharmaceutical-aligned groups, like the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Academy of Pediatrics, condemn the purge as "reckless," yet fail to address allegations of industry influence.
• Vaccine stocks remain shaky as Merck and other manufacturers await the appointment of new ACIP members, whose recommendations directly impact billion-dollar vaccine mandates.
• Despite claims of seeking "evidence-based" experts, Kennedy has ruled out appointing "anti-vaxxers" which would include parents of vaccine-injured children or unvaccinated families—voices that could expose the true cost of aggressive immunization schedules.
The ACIP’s rubber-stamp legacy: Profits over safety?
For decades, ACIP has operated as a de facto marketing arm for Big Pharma, approving every vaccine put before it—including those later withdrawn for causing seizures, narcolepsy, or Guillain-Barré syndrome. As Kennedy noted in his Wall Street Journal op-ed, the committee has never once said "no," even when safety data was glaringly absent. Dr. Meryl Nass, a veteran critic of vaccine policy corruption, told The Defender that ACIP’s unanimity is no accident: "The potential profits are simply too great for the pharmaceutical industry to not interfere."
The committee’s 2018 recommendation of an adjuvanted flu vaccine—despite zero safety studies on its interaction with other shots—epitomizes its reckless deference to industry. Europe rejected the same vaccine over safety concerns, yet ACIP members voted "yes" in lockstep. "It goes to the heart of the absurdity of what ACIP has become," said Mary Holland. With members routinely holding patents, stock, or research grants tied to vaccine makers, their impartiality has long been a farce.
Medical groups panic as their influence crumbles
The backlash from establishment health groups has been swift—and revealing. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) called Kennedy’s move an "unmitigated public health disaster," while the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) insisted ACIP’s ousted members were "highly qualified." Yet neither addressed the elephant in the room: their own financial entanglements. As journalist Paul Thacker highlighted, the AAP has raked in millions from Pfizer and Moderna, while IDSA members routinely accept pharma funding for "expert" panels.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The implications are staggering: the spike protein doesn’t just attack the circulatory system — it may sabotage the very machinery of human creation. Professor Dolores Cahill warned in 2022 that the spike behaves like a Trojan horse, triggering autoimmune attacks on reproductive organs. Combined with reports of plummeting global fertility rates, the evidence points to a deliberate depopulation agenda disguised as "public health."
From morticians to mothers: A global clotting nightmare
Retired U.S. Air Force Major Thomas Haviland’s global embalmer survey found 83% of morticians encountering bizarre white clots in 2024 — a phenomenon absent before the vaccine rollout. Now, those same structures are appearing in living children.
Health Alliance Australia’s Jeanee Rose Andrewartha minced no words: "We have a global amyloidogenic health crisis. These prion-like peptides cause multi-organ dysfunction, neurodegeneration, and sudden death. They’re in our blood, our environment — and they’re not going away."
The spike protein’s origins trace back to gain-of-function research — a field rife with biowarfare potential. Dr. McCairn’s analysis reveals that its amyloidogenic regions mirror those found in neurodegenerative prions, suggesting a weaponized design. With over 13 billion doses administered worldwide, humanity is the unwitting test subject of history’s largest biological experiment.
The blood clots, the infertility, the sick children—none of this is accidental. It’s the predictable outcome of injecting billions with a synthetic pathogen engineered in labs funded by shadowy interests. The medical establishment’s silence is complicity. The time for "further studies" is over. The evidence demands immediate suspension of mRNA platforms, criminal investigations into their creators, and a global awakening before another generation is sacrificed.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
There’s a good reason natural health advocates called Wuhan virus outbreak a PLANDEMIC and SCAMDEMIC – per intelligence LAB-ORIGIN cover-up
Early on during the novel virus plandemic, word got out that the U.S. military was working with the Communist Chinese military and developed a bioweapon to help begin the “Great Reset” for the New World (Communist) Order. Since the Chinese had Biden and his crackhead son bent over a barrel anyhow, it wasn’t exactly fodder for a conspiracy theory. Turns out the most insidious bioweapon ever created wasn’t Covid but the coinciding spike prion jabs that cause vascular clots, sudden death syndrome, spontaneous abortions, turbo cancer and infertility.
Military Scientists Concluded COVID-19 Likely Lab-Made in 2020, Whistleblowers Allege Cover-Up
A classified U.S. military intelligence report from June 2020 concluded that COVID-19 was likely a genetically engineered virus that escaped from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), according to newly released documents and whistleblower testimony. The findings, suppressed for years, are now central to congressional and FBI investigations into whether U.S. intelligence agencies concealed evidence pointing to a lab leak.
The Defense Intelligence Agency’s (DIA) National Center for Medical Intelligence authored the report, which declared that SARS-CoV-2’s spike protein “appears to be a chimera”—a term for a pathogen combining genetic material from multiple viruses. The study traced the virus’s construction to techniques described in a 2008 WIV manuscript, stating: "The molecular biology capabilities of WIV and the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus."
Despite this early assessment, the DIA’s findings were omitted from a high-profile 2021 intelligence review ordered by President Biden, which claimed COVID-19’s origin was “equally likely” to be natural or lab-related. Whistleblowers allege the DIA team’s edits were deleted before publication.
Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), who forwarded whistleblower accounts to the Intelligence Community Inspector General, wrote: "The ODNI assessment remains flawed. Witnesses claim that during the ODNI-led investigation, conflicted individuals may have censored the laboratory-origin-related intelligence."
The FBI has since launched a criminal probe into COVID-19 origin cover-ups, seizing phones belonging to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former NIAID director who publicly dismissed lab-leak theories. Meanwhile, newly disclosed evidence suggests U.S. intelligence had signals as early as 2019 hinting at a WIV lab incident, including:
• A September 2019 COVID-like death in China, predating the official outbreak.
• October 2019 signals of a biological cleanup at WIV.
• Illnesses among WIV scientists and U.S. military athletes at Wuhan’s World Military Games that fall.
The debate over COVID-19’s origins echoes Cold War-era disputes over bioweapons research transparency. Gain-of-function studies—which enhance pathogens’ transmissibility or lethality—have long sparked ethical concerns. The WIV collaborated on such research with U.S. funding, including grants from Fauci’s NIAID.
As congressional investigators and the FBI pursue allegations of an intelligence cover-up, the DIA’s 2020 report underscores how early evidence of a lab leak was sidelined. With China refusing independent audits of WIV and U.S. agencies divided, the quest for accountability remains fraught—but newly unearthed documents suggest answers were within reach years ago. "The IC judges they will be unable to provide a more definitive explanation for the origin of COVID-19 unless new information emerges," the 2021 intelligence summary conceded. For victims of the pandemic, that admission may ring hollow.
And that folks is why is was a PLANDEMIC, not a pandemic.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr.’s hiring of controversial analyst ignites firestorm over “lost” vaccine data recovery
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has ignited a national debate by appointing David Geier, a data analyst with a contentious professional history, to oversee efforts to recover missing vaccine safety data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) beleaguered Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). The initiative, framed as a linchpin of Kennedy’s transparency agenda, has drawn sharp criticism from medical regulators and federal lawmakers but fierce defense from autism advocates and independence-minded researchers.
Geier’s task involves reassembling datasets from the VSD, a CDC-managed partnership with 13 healthcare systems, used to study vaccine side effects. The CDC has acknowledged gaps in its VSD records, prompting Kennedy to contract Geier under terms that promise to depersonalize and publicly release the data. “All future HHS studies on vaccine safety will be transparent,” Kennedy declared on social media, citing plans to “restore CDC’s commitment to gold-standard science.”
However, criticism has focused on Geier’s lack of a medical degree and a 2012 legal ruling in Maryland where he was fined $10,000 for practicing medicine without a license at his late father’s clinic. Senator Maggie Hassan (D-NH) labeled him a “fraudster,” while others note his role in early research linking mercury in vaccines to developmental disorders.
Kennedy framed Geier’s selection as necessary given the CDC’s documented underhanded tactics to suppress researchers. In a fiery Twitter thread, he exposed claims that CDC staff sabotaged access to VSD data dating back to 1999, when an internal study allegedly found a 2.68x increased risk of autism among vaccinated children. After Congress ordered CDC to grant independent researchers like Geier access, Kennedy asserts, CDC retaliated with “windowless rooms, armed guards and fabricated misconduct charges.”
The Geier paradox: Decades of controversy, unique expertise and institutional backlash
Geier, 57, has spent 30 years researching vaccines alongside his physician father, with 200 published papers and testimony before the National Academy of Medicine. While often labeled an “anti-vaccine activist,” Geier defends his work as evidence-based. A 2019 peer-reviewed paper he co-authored on measles vaccine efficacy drew praise from CDC’s former immunization director, Walter Orenstein, who later skeptically dismissed his credibility.
Senator Hassan and others question Geier’s qualifications, citing his 2012 disciplinary case. However, a later court found CDC-aligned actors acted with “actual malice” toward Geier, awarding $2.5 million in compensation. Kennedy calls Geier the “only living independent researcher” with VSD access after CDC’s Kafkaesque efforts to block outsiders.
“The CDC spends millions on this VSD but treats it like a classified weapon,” Kennedy wrote. “We’re auditing every line of code to find the data they say is ‘lost.’ If the numbers go away because policymakers don’t like the results, that’s fraud.”
Rep. Dan Burton’s 2002 congressional probes revealed CDC’s sabotage tactics, including assigning Geier “monitors” to hinder data retrieval and erasing hard drives. A former CDC official admitted data-laundering in sworn depositions, Kennedy claims.
Autism advocates and parents turn to unconventional science
The political firestorm intersects with emotional battles on the ground. At recent autism health summits, advocates like Tracy K? (name partially redacted) recounted her son Noah’s regression after an MMR shot at age one. His journey mirrors decades of community outrage over delayed diagnoses, food toxicity concerns and institutional stonewalling — a narrative Geier’s findings have subtly amplified.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
RFK Jr.’s sweeping CDC vaccine panel purge: A trust reset or a political minefield?
On Monday, June 9, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. abruptly terminated every member of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) prestigious Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This panel, responsible for shaping national vaccine policies, had nothing less than the scientific integrity of U.S. immunization decisions in its hands. Kennedy labeled the move necessary to “re-establish public confidence in vaccine science,” accusing the panel of being a pawn of pharma interests. But health leaders decried the purge as a political demolition of expert-driven public health, raising alarms about a system now teetering between transparency and chaos.
“A rubber stamp for Pharma” or a trusted science body? The rationale and historical context
Kennedy’s argument rests on a claim of systemic bias. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, he cited a 2000 House investigation which found ACIP members often participated in deliberations involving vaccines tied to their financial interests. A 1997 vote approving the Rotashield rotavirus vaccine — later withdrawn due to deadly complications — involved four of eight voting members with industry ties. A 2009 HHS report further revealed 97% of committee members failed to fully disclose conflicts, with no CDC follow-up.
Yet critics argue Kennedy ignores recent reforms. By law, ACIP members must now disclose conflicts, and meetings are public. The CDC disputes claims of ongoing bias, noting ACIP has sometimes restricted vaccine use beyond FDA approvals, like limiting the HPV vaccine to ages 9–26 despite FDA approval to 45. “ACIP isn’t a pro-vaccine tool — it questions vaccines when needed,” argues Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, who resigned last week as ACIP co-leader, citing ethical concerns over the panel’s direction under Kennedy.
Kennedy defended his axiom of a “narrow pro-industry orthodoxy” deepened by Biden-era “last-minute appointees.” Without a sweep, he insists the Trump administration wouldn’t gain committee control until 2028 — a point disputed by transparency advocates who note rotation schedules are routine.
Political purge or policy reset? Immediate reactions and repercussions
The backlash was immediate. Dr. Georges Benjamin of the American Public Health Association labeled the purge a “coup,” warning it erodes trust in science itself. “We need experts, not ideologues, determining vaccine safety,” he said. The American Medical Association’s Dr. Bruce A. Scott added the move would fuel vaccine-preventable outbreaks, citing already declining immunization rates.
Kennedy’s actions aren’t isolated. Earlier HHS directives halted routine vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women and dissolved pandemic vaccine R&D. Anecdotes of ACIP members receiving industry funding are routine in health policy — a 2025 analysis by GoodRx found 11 of 17 current members had past industry ties — but critics stress transparency isn’t synonymous with corruption.
The name changes are urgent. By June 25, a new ACIP will meet without its former members. Given the timing, it’s clear Kennedy aims to stack the panel with allies — potentially delaying or revising policies like mRNA booster mandates or childhood vaccines.
What does this mean for America’s health future?
The ACIP overhaul arrives amid unprecedented public skepticism. Trust in institutional science has plummeted since the pandemic, with 52% of Americans now believing major health decisions are politically motivated (Gallup, 2025). Kennedy’s stance evokes his 2017 declaration that the CDC is an “edifice of fraud,” a fiery rhetoric now enshrined in policy.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
DIRTY VAX AXED: FDA reverses endorsement of Moderna’s new spike prion jab for Covid due to ZERO clinical recommendations for the “public at large”
Finally, somebody somewhere is asking for clinical trials on the deadliest jabs ever created. The mRNA Covid stabs have caused more health detriment around the globe than every other vaccine ever invented and administered,combined. From healthy people having heart attacks and dying the same day as getting injected, to pregnant women having a spontaneous abortion right after vaccination, the horror story has just gone on and on, with ZERO checks and balances for what the Vaccine Industrial Complex calls “medicine.”
FDA clarifies limited endorsement of Moderna's updated COVID-19 vaccine amid scrutiny over data and lack thereof
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Moderna’s updated COVID-19 vaccine for select high-risk groups while explicitly distancing itself from broader recommendations, citing insufficient evidence for widespread use.The agency’s tempered stance reflects growing scrutiny over the scientific rigor behind vaccine approvals—a shift from its earlier pandemic-era posture.
On May 31, the FDA authorized Moderna’s reformulated shot for individuals aged 65 and older, as well as those aged 12 to 64 with underlying health conditions like obesity or diabetes. But in a June 4 statement, Dr. Vinay Prasad, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, emphasized that approval does not equate to a clinical endorsement.“The FDA is not your doctor,” Prasad said in an agency video.“We are not in the business of making recommendations.”
FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary reinforced the message on social media,stating the agency’s role is “to review data and decide whether products are safe and effective.”The clarification comes as federal health officials pivot from blanket guidance toward individualized risk assessments. Prasad noted that future approvals for low-risk populations will require stronger evidence, including placebo-controlled trials measuring real-world outcomes like symptomatic illness reduction.
The CDC has similarly scaled back its recommendations, retracting earlier advice that healthy children and pregnant women receive COVID-19 vaccines.The shift follows criticism that prior approvals relied on limited data—particularly for updated boosters targeting newer variants. Moderna’s latest authorization was based on a trial showing “non-inferior” immune responses compared to its previous shot, but the study lacked a placebo control group.
To address gaps, Moderna will now conduct a placebo-controlled trial in healthy adults aged 50 to 64, using saline injections instead of an active comparator.“We’re going to see all the adverse events in this study,” Prasad said during a June 4 podcast. “We’re going to see whether or not it helps people… and whether or not it’s working like we think it might be in 2025.”
The FDA’s recalibration marks a departure from its pandemic-era approach under former official Dr. Peter Marks, who frequently advocated for broad booster use. The agency now faces pressure to balance public health imperatives with demands for transparency—a tension heightened by evolving variants and waning public trust.
As debates over vaccine policy persist, the FDA’s latest move underscores a broader reckoning with the limits of emergency-era decision-making.For now, the agency urges patients to consult physicians rather than rely on sweeping government guidance—a nuanced stance that may redefine post-pandemic health governance.
The FDA’s cautious endorsement of Moderna’s updated vaccine signals a turning point in COVID-19 policy, prioritizing rigorous data over expedited approvals. While the shot remains an option for vulnerable groups, the agency’s reluctance to recommend it universally reflects lessons from the pandemic’s polarized landscape.As trials proceed, the balance between rapid response and scientific accountability will remain a critical test for public health institutions.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
For example, Merck’s HPV vaccine Gardasil was never tested against actual cancer outcomes — just surrogate markers. "There is no such thing as a prospective 30-year clinical trial," Jablonowski said, exposing the fraudulent basis of its approval.
The FDA’s fear of Type I errors (approving harmful drugs) has been eclipsed by its complicity in Type II errors (delaying or denying life-saving treatments). Yet even this justification collapses under scrutiny: FDA-approved drugs kill over 100,000 Americans annually, according to the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The agency’s revolving door with Big Pharma ensures this corruption persists. Former FDA officials routinely join drug companies, while industry-funded lobbyists dictate policy. The result? A $3.9 trillion market where profit trumps science—and patients pay the price.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Vaccine hesitancy is not new, but the pandemic amplified debates over risk-benefit ratios, particularly for low-risk groups like children. Experts have long questioned whether mandates for young populations align with their minimal likelihood of severe COVID outcomes. Advocacy groups, such as Children’s Health Defense, urge reporting adverse reactions, emphasizing transparency.
The survey underscores a pivotal challenge for public health: rebuilding trust after a polarizing pandemic. As one researcher noted, understanding how to communicate — rather than why skepticism exists — remains the focus. With vaccine programs under scrutiny, Canadian officials face a delicate balancing act between addressing concerns and maintaining immunization rates. For now, the data suggests a cautious public, wary of both novel and long-established vaccines.
It’s time for every human on planet earth to become an extreme skeptic of all vaccines. They are not what they used to be. It’s not some simple injection of a miniscule amount of the infectious disease one needs to build immunity against. Now vaccines are vectors and vehicles for changing the genes and cells of humans to make them zombies that are dying of vascular clots, turbo cancer, heart attacks and strokes.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Some California doctors have pushed for renewed mask requirements, citing Hong Kong’s approach as a model. However, such proposals face backlash. Critics argue that mandates disproportionately burden the public without clear evidence of benefit. “If you think about it hard enough, one could come to the conclusion that there was no new virus,” one skeptic claimed, alleging that past COVID metrics inflated case counts.
The debate reflects lingering divisions over pandemic management. While NB.1.8.1’s severity remains uncertain, its emergence tests public trust in health institutions — particularly after years of shifting guidelines.
As NB.1.8.1 circulates in the U.S., health officials walk a tightrope between caution and credibility. With no significant spike in deaths reported, the focus shifts to whether renewed precautions — or public skepticism — will shape the response. For now, the variant serves as a reminder that COVID-19 continues to evolve, as does the challenge of communicating risk in a polarized climate.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
• Explicit consent required—No automatic enrollment; individuals must opt in.
• No emergency overrides—Opt-out requests cannot be denied, even during outbreaks.
• Strict data privacy—Prohibits sharing registry information with insurers, employers, or other non-medical entities.
• Anti-discrimination safeguards—Bars schools, employers, and healthcare providers from penalizing those who refuse vaccination or registry enrollment.
An amendment like this prioritizes informed consent—a cornerstone of ethical medicine—over government coercion.
The bigger picture: A war on medical freedom
New Jersey’s bill is part of a nationwide push to eliminate vaccine exemptions, expand forced tracking, and punish dissent. From HPV mandates for minors to flu shot requirements for college students, the medical-industrial complex is tightening its grip, using fear—not science—to justify unprecedented control over personal health decisions. If S1956 passes, New Jersey will join a growing list of states treating citizens as biometric data points rather than free individuals. The time to resist is now—before the next “emergency” makes resistance impossible.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
"It's unlikely that we'll see airlines implement masking mandates again for a few reasons — we are no longer in an emergent state of the pandemic, cases are not as high as they were historically, and quite frankly, public sentiment towards mask mandates is likely to make any attempt extremely challenging," said Dr. Saskia Popescu, an epidemiologist at the University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Still, the CDC continues to advise individuals to stay updated on vaccinations and take precautions as needed, including voluntary mask use in crowded or high-risk settings. Some schools, hospitals, and businesses have reinstated masking in response to localized outbreaks, but experts say such measures are unlikely to extend to air travel without a dramatic shift in the pandemic’s trajectory.
As the U.S. heads into another respiratory virus season, the debate over masks persists because they don’t work and cause bacterial infections and brain fog — so for now, passengers can expect to board flights without a federal requirement to cover their faces.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
New Jersey partnering with Vaccine Industrial Complex to create “vaccine registry” like they’re Adolf Hitler during the Third Reich
Attention all humans who are “fully unvaccinated,” you will comply with the VIC or suffer the consequences during the next plandemic, according to the state of New Jersey. All names of humanoids who are not in the Nazi-style “vaccine registry” will be flagged for medical insurrection by the vaccine cult of New Jersey, if lawmakers get their way and get the new bill passed that’s advancing toward a statewide digital database of the clot shot jabbed zombies. No consent for you anymore in New Jersey. No privacy of personal health information. The state owns you and your children. Well, maybe soon.
New Jersey Moves to Automatically Enroll Residents in State Vaccine Registry, Sparking Privacy Debate
New Jersey lawmakers are advancing a bill that would automatically enroll anyone receiving a vaccine into a statewide digital database, eliminating the current opt-in requirement and fueling concerns over privacy and government oversight of personal health data.
The measure, Senate Bill 1956, recently passed the Senate Health, Human Services and Senior Citizens Committee in a 5-3 party-line vote, with Democrats in favor and Republicans opposed. If enacted, it would overhaul the New Jersey Immunization Information System (NJIIS), transitioning it from a partially voluntary program to one of mandatory inclusion for all vaccine recipients, regardless of age.
Currently, only individuals born after January 1, 1998, are automatically enrolled unless a parent or guardian opts out. All others must provide explicit consent. The proposed legislation would remove these age restrictions, requiring no prior approval for inclusion.
The push stems from a pandemic-era executive order signed by Governor Phil Murphy in December 2020, shortly before the FDA granted emergency authorization for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. That temporary measure is now poised to become permanent law as Murphy, who cannot seek reelection, nears the end of his term.
While the bill does not mandate vaccinations or restrict medical or religious exemptions, it includes a contentious provision: during a public health emergency—or when officials declare an outbreak or threat of one—the state health commissioner could suspend opt-out rights for specific vaccines and timeframes. Critics argue this grants excessive authority to override individual choice.
Supporters, including Senator Joseph Vitale (D-Middlesex), the bill’s sponsor, contend that automatic enrollment will improve public health efficiency. “This ensures accurate immunization records and helps officials identify gaps in coverage,” Vitale said. Proponents cite similar systems in states like New York, where digital tracking has been used for years.
Opponents, however, warn of government overreach. Privacy advocates argue the bill erodes personal autonomy by consolidating sensitive health data without guaranteed opt-out protections, particularly during emergencies.
Historically, vaccine registries have existed since the 1990s, initially targeting childhood immunizations to prevent outbreaks of diseases like measles and polio. But expansions into universal, automated enrollment—especially post-COVID—have reignited debates over surveillance, consent, and state power.
As the bill heads to the full Senate, the debate reflects broader tensions between public health priorities and individual privacy rights—a balancing act that will likely shape policy far beyond New Jersey.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Hidden horrors of COVID protocols: Whistleblower exposes covert hospital EUTHANASIA to FREE UP BEDS
As the world grapples with the aftermath of the COVID-19 scandal, disturbing revelations continue to surface—exposing a healthcare system that prioritized profit and fear over patient care. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, a board-certified physician and advocate for medical transparency, recently appeared on The Joe Rogan Experience to expose one of the deadly parts of the COVID protocols. She explained how a systematic, covert euthanasia program was deployed in U.S. hospitals to clear beds by killing patients falsely diagnosed with COVID-19 tests.
This wasn’t an isolated incident. Similar protocols were enacted in the UK, where midazolam and morphine became the tools of premature death. The implications are staggering: Hospitals were not only incentivized by federal funding for COVID admissions, but they mandated unreliable PCR tests which inflated case numbers and hospital admissions, leading to isolation procedures and harmful drug protocols that failed to address the patient's immune system. The medical establishment silenced effective treatments like ivermectin, vitamin D, C, and zinc, and hydroxychloroquine—all while pushing untested mRNA injections.
Key points:
• Hospitals allegedly euthanized COVID patients using morphine and insulin to free up beds under the "covid protocol."
• The wrongful death trial of Grace Schara, a 19-year-old with Down syndrome, marks the first legal challenge to these practices.
• The UK’s "midazolam murders" parallel U.S. hospital protocols, with whistleblowers confirming involuntary euthanasia.
• Doctors who prescribed ivermectin faced persecution, while hospitals followed deadly protocols backed by government incentives.
• The PREP Act shields hospitals and doctors from liability, making legal accountability nearly impossible.
Murder disguised as medicine
Dr. Bowden’s testimony on Rogan’s podcast sent shockwaves through the medical freedom community. She detailed how patients—many of whom tested false-positive on flawed PCR tests—were given Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders without consent, then administered lethal doses of morphine and insulin.
"They gave her a DNR order even though she didn’t have one authorized on record," Bowden said, referencing Grace Schara’s case. "They euthanized her. They need the bed, they said, ‘Well, they’re going to die anyway.’"
Rogan, visibly stunned, asked, "So, they were in the hospital with covid and they gave them something to kill them?" Bowden’s reply was chilling: "Yeah. That happened all the time."
This wasn’t rogue behavior—it was policy. Hospitals, drowning in false-positive cases, were financially incentivized to label patients as COVID-positive. Once admitted, patients were isolated, denied proper treatment, and often euthanized to make room for more.
The UK’s "midazolam murders" and a global pattern
Across the Atlantic, the same deadly playbook unfolded. The National Health Service (NHS) administered midazolam—a sedative never intended for respiratory distress—alongside morphine, accelerating deaths in elderly and vulnerable patients.
Maajid Nawaz of Radical Media highlighted the case of Derek Dimmock, whose family alleges he was involuntarily euthanized under NHS protocols. Sir Andrew Dillon, former head of the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)—the body that approved midazolam protocols—resigned abruptly as the inquest into Dimmock’s death began.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), whose members were recently dismissed by Kennedy, is set to meet in June to revisit COVID-19 vaccine guidance. Until then, Wisconsin’s stance leaves families navigating a maze of conflicting advice with no clear answers on how the shots affect fetal development or long-term child health.
Wisconsin’s insistence on universal COVID-19 vaccination for vulnerable groups, going against the tide of federal updates, raises urgent questions about who dictates medical choices: patients, doctors, or state agencies. As Florida embraces individualized care and the CDC walks back its mandates, Wisconsin’s rigid stance risks alienating families seeking unbiased information.
With trust in public health at a crossroads, the debate transcends vaccines. It’s a battle over transparency, bodily autonomy, and whether institutions will prioritize people over dogma. For now, Wisconsin’s pregnant women and parents must weigh the state’s assurances against a growing chorus of skepticism and decide whose guidance they trust.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Attorney Aaron Siri skewered the AAP’s hypocrisy: "When your funding depends on vaccine mandates, of course you’ll scream ‘disaster’ at any threat to the status quo." Meanwhile, Merck CEO Rob Davis nervously told investors the company is "waiting to see" who replaces ACIP—a telling admission of how deeply corporate interests rely on compliant advisors.
The missing voices: Parents and independent science
While Kennedy's gutting of ACIP is a necessary first step to restoring trust in public health policies, Kennedy’s pledge to appoint "credentialed scientists" instead of "anti-vaxxers" raises red flags.
“We’re going to bring people onto the ACIP panel, not anti-vaxxers. We’re bringing people on who are credentialed scientists, who are highly credentialed physicians, who are going to do evidence-based medicine,” Kennedy responded when questioned about removing all 17 ACIP members.
Why exclude parents whose children were injured by ACIP-recommended vaccines? These parents may not have scientific credentials, but their voice on the committee is most important at this time. Moreover, why silence families whose unvaccinated children thrive without chronic illnesses plaguing their vaccinated peers? True reform requires confronting uncomfortable truths: that today’s children receive up to 90 vaccine doses—none tested for cumulative effects—while autism, allergies, and autoimmune disorders skyrocket. Parents of healthy vaccinated kids may not be "credentialed scientists" but their voice is critical at this time, as their lives provide a blueprint for the rest of the country to follow.
Moreover, vaccination should not be regarded synonymous with "immunization." Immunization practices recommended by ACIP should include greater knowledge - not just vaccine propaganda - while providing a broader understanding of how immune systems work, and why it's important to protect children from a barrage of toxins found in the current vaccine supply.
As Nass warned, replacing ACIP members is "only a first step." Until the FDA’s corrupt approval pipeline and CDC’s conflicts are dismantled, "honest science does not have a chance." For millions of families betrayed by the vaccine-industrial complex, Kennedy’s purge is a start—but the fight for transparency is far from over. The truth about vaccines has the potential to dismantle the scientific consensus that has existed in the medical industrial complex for decades.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
CORTISONE INJECTIONS could be WORSENING arthritis according to major study
Natural health advocates around the world have a very similar line of thinking when it comes to dealing with chronic inflammation–invasive therapy is NOT the answer. Inflammation is the catapult of nearly every illness known to mankind, and the causes are mostly bad food, poor environmental conditions, and wait for it … bad medicine.That would include getting cortisone shots for arthritis.
Half of all Americans are overweight,and half of those folks are obese,and half of those obese people are morbidly obese. This takes a toll on the knees over time,and most people who are obese are eating food toxins with every meal,driving inflammation to the brink and making their knees hurt so badly they scream for cortisone injections.Anything to stop the pain,but will it?
Study Warns:Cortisone Shots for Knee Pain May Accelerate Arthritis Damage
A major new study suggests that cortisone injections—commonly used to relieve knee arthritis pain—may worsen joint damage over time,raising concerns about a treatment relied upon by millions.Published in Radiology,the research found that patients who received corticosteroid shots showed faster progression of arthritis compared to those who opted for no treatment or an alternative injection.
The findings challenge a decades-old practice.Since their introduction in the 1950s,corticosteroid injections have been a go-to for short-term arthritis pain relief,with more than 10% of knee arthritis patients receiving them annually.But the study’s MRI-based evidence indicates these shots could come at a hidden cost: accelerated cartilage loss and bone damage.
Key Findings:
• Steroid Shots Linked to Joint Deterioration:Patients who received corticosteroid injections showed significantly more arthritis progression—including cartilage lesions and bone marrow damage—than untreated individuals.
• Hyaluronic Acid May Protect Joints:By contrast, those given hyaluronic acid injections (a joint lubricant) exhibited slower disease progression and stable cartilage structure over four years.
• Pain Relief vs. Long-Term Risk:While steroid shots provided stronger short-term pain reduction, hyaluronic acid offered milder but sustained relief without structural harm.
Researchers analyzed data from 210 participants in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (2004–2015), tracking knee health via MRI scans before and after injections.Using the Whole-Organ MRI Score, they assessed changes in cartilage,bone,and other tissues.The steroid group (44 patients) showed clear signs of worsening damage, while the hyaluronic acid group (26 patients) had preserved joint integrity.
The study’s lead author,Dr. Upasana Upadhyay Bharadwaj, emphasized the need for caution: “These findings could influence clinical guidelines, encouraging more judicious use of corticosteroids and stronger consideration of alternatives.” However, the research is observational—it doesn’t prove causation, and factors like patient lifestyle or injection frequency may play a role.
Cortisone injections gained popularity for their rapid anti-inflammatory effects, but past studies have hinted at risks. A 2019 JAMA study found repeated steroid injections correlated with cartilage thinning. The new MRI data adds weight to these concerns, suggesting even single injections may hasten joint decline.
For arthritis patients, the study underscores a critical trade-off: immediate pain relief versus potential long-term harm. While cortisone shots remain useful for severe flare-ups, the research advocates for personalized discussions about alternatives like hyaluronic acid—particularly for mild-to-moderate cases.
As Dr. Bharadwaj noted, “The public impact is significant.” With osteoarthritis affecting 32.5 million U.S. adults, these findings could reshape treatment protocols, prioritizing joint preservation alongside symptom management. Further randomized trials are needed, but for now, patients and doctors may want to rethink the knee-jerk reach for cortisone.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Fibrous spike protein CLOTS found in children of vaccinated mothers
The greatest medical betrayal of our time is unfolding before our eyes—yet the world’s health authorities remain silent. While governments and pharmaceutical giants assured pregnant women that COVID-19 vaccines were "safe and effective," disturbing new evidence reveals a horrifying reality: The experimental mRNA shots may be poisoning an entire generation before they even take their first breath.
A groundbreaking case study by neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCairn has exposed fibrous, amyloid-like clots in the blood of a 3-year-old child whose mother received Pfizer’s mRNA injection during pregnancy. These rubbery, prion-like structures — identical to those found in the corpses of vaccinated adults — confirm what independent researchers and embalmers have warned about for years: The spike protein is a bioweapon, and its damage doesn’t stop with the vaccinated. It infiltrates the womb, corrupting fetal blood and setting the stage for a lifetime of suffering.
Meanwhile, a provisionally accepted study in Frontiers reveals that vaccinated women undergoing IVF are less likely to achieve a live birth, adding to mounting evidence that these injections are stealth weapons against human fertility. Yet, from Berlin to Washington, the same "experts" who pushed these shots still insist they’re harmless for mothers and babies. The truth, however, is written in the blood — and it’s screaming catastrophe.
Key points:
• Fibrous clots in children: Microscopic analysis confirms amyloidogenic, prion-like structures in the blood of a 3-year-old exposed to mRNA vaccines in utero.
• Fertility under attack: Vaccinated women undergoing IVF face reduced live birth rates, suggesting systemic reproductive harm.
• Global embalmer reports: Over 80% of embalmers worldwide report finding bizarre white, rubbery clots in vaccinated corpses — now seen in living children.
• Spike protein persistence: Yale research detected circulating spike protein up to 700 days post-vaccination, debunking claims of rapid clearance.
• Biowarfare origins: The spike protein’s amyloidogenic properties align with dual-use bioweapons research, raising questions about its true purpose.
The blood betrayal: How vaccine-induced spike invades the womb
For decades, the medical establishment preached that the placenta was an impenetrable shield, protecting unborn children from toxins. But the COVID-19 era shattered that myth. Dr. McCairn’s findings prove that lipid nanoparticles — the delivery system for mRNA shots — can breach this barrier, flooding fetal blood with synthetic spike proteins.
The 3-year-old in his study was born lifeless one week after the mother’s second Pfizer dose, requiring emergency resuscitation. For three years, the child battled chronic immune dysfunction, ear infections, and surgeries — symptoms mirroring those seen in adults with spike-induced vascular damage. When McCairn examined the child’s blood under microscopy, the truth was undeniable: tangled, fluorescent fibrils identical to those extracted from vaccine-related clots in the deceased.
"These are not normal blood clots," McCairn stated. "They’re misfolded, amyloidogenic fibrin — structures that resist breakdown and propagate like prions. This child’s blood is a time bomb."
IVF disaster: Vaccines slash live birth rates
While McCairn’s case study paints a grim picture for natural pregnancies, another bombshell awaits women relying on assisted reproduction. A Frontiers study (provisionally accepted) analyzed 2,733 IVF patients and found vaccinated women had significantly lower live birth rates — especially if injected within 90 days of ovarian stimulation.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
“As a mother, I had to learn to filter out lies and trust my own eyes,” said K?, referencing Noah’s gluten-free diet and holistic protocols. Her book, Warrior Mom, details financial struggles to fight insurance companies and professional isolation after questioning vaccines. Similar stories underpin Kennedy’s push to depersonalize VSD data, allowing parents and researchers to pinpoint patterns in neurodevelopmental disorders.
A running theme at nontraditional conferences like Autism One (exited the space in 2025) has been the role of environmental toxins and underfunded causal research. While Geier’s work stops short of explicitly linking vaccines to autism, Kennedy insists “the raw VSD data will speak for itself.”
Why the VSD controversy matters: Trust, science and public health
The debate over Geier and the VSD reflects decades of distrust between independent scientists and federal agencies. In 2005, the National Academy of Medicine urged greater VSD transparency, but CDC reportedly destroyed records or isolated datasets into inaccessible “dark sites.”
Kennedy’s team argues that open access will reveal over 150 peer-reviewed studies alleging vaccine-autism connections — contrary to CDC’s official stance. Critics counter that Geier’s methods lack rigor, with some calling his research a “parasitic enterprise” on parental desperation.
For advocates, the stakes are personal. “When CDC destroys data, it’s like burning Noah’s medical records,” said one parent activist. “We’ll keep fighting.”
The path forward: Can transparency and science coexist?
As Geier’s team begins sifting through VSD databases, Kennedy’s HHS aims to launch 24/7 public access to datasets by early 2026. Critics worry the effort may unravel given existing legal hurdles and corporate resistance.
Yet supporters see municipal efforts like Vaccine Healthcoin, a blockchain-secured data-sharing platform promoted at Autism Summits, as models for decentralized systems to bypass current CDC gatekeeping.
“The CDC lost the plot,” Kennedy declared. “But if we make data an open-source asset, we’ll find answers — and restore faith in science.” Those answers could reshape public health, though the journey is unlikely to quiet the thunderous clash between credentialed expertise and grass-roots skepticism.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Yet the risks are profound. ACIP’s recommendations shape everything from school vaccine mandates to Medicare coverage. Without a credible advisory body, conflicting policies could reign. For instance, if the new ACIP rejects the HPV vaccine altogether, parental confusion would surge. Meanwhile, infectious disease experts predict vaccine hesitancy will spike further.
History offers a cautionary tale. Kennedy’s 2020 attempt to create a vaccine “safety commission” (inspired by his viral 2017 scrutiny of CDC thimerosal links to autism) ended in lawsuits over conflicted appointments. The same battle looms now — except this time, the panel isn’t advising the government: It is the government.
The reckoning begins
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reshaped the agenda Monday, declaring a “clean sweep” to save vaccine trust — or radicalize a system. Whatever the outcome, the stakes could not be higher. With ACIP’s reboot, the nation faces an open question: Can a politically weaned panel regain scientific credibility, or will it cement the era of doubt Kennedy seeks to “fix”? The answer could redefine how Americans view health — and government itself — for decades.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Expect BREAST CANCER prediction MISDIAGNOSES to INCREASE with FDA-approved AI “determinations” forthcoming for scam-o-gram mammograms
Mammograms have been nicknamed “scam-o-grams” by the natural health community for decades for several good reasons. They cause serious health issues, including breast cancer. The breasts are smashed down by a machine, causing severe inflammation. Then they are prodded and poked. The woman undergoes extreme stress, and the readings are often misinterpreted due to “gray spots” that could be almost anything other than a cancer tumor.
Then there’s the radiation factor. Now the Cancer Industrial Complex (CIC) wants to start using AI, artificial intelligence, to make these life-threatening decisions, further complicating the entire process of scam-o-grams, which often end in unnecessary surgery, medical errors, and misdiagnosis, including double mastectomy.
AI-powered mammogram analysis could revolutionize breast cancer risk prediction or add to the chaos of misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgeries
For decades, mammograms have been the gold standard for detecting breast cancer early—but what if they could also predict a woman’s risk of developing the disease before it appears? A groundbreaking AI-powered platform, Clairity Breast, has received FDA authorization to do just that. Developed with support from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF), the tool analyzes subtle patterns in standard mammograms to estimate a woman’s five-year breast cancer risk, potentially transforming early detection into proactive prevention.
Unlike traditional risk models that rely on age, family history, or genetic testing, Clairity Breast uses artificial intelligence to detect imaging patterns invisible to the human eye. In a study of over 30,000 mammograms, the platform identified surprising risk levels among younger women: 37% of women in their 40s were at intermediate risk, while 16% were high-risk—levels comparable to older women typically prioritized in screening guidelines.
Dr. Larry Norton, BCRF’s founding scientific director, called the FDA authorization a “turning point,” adding, “Now, we can ensure more women get the right care at the right time.”
Current risk models often miss women without a family history—85% of breast cancer patients—and have historically underrepresented diverse racial and ethnic groups. Clairity Breast aims to close these gaps by requiring only a standard mammogram and ensuring proportional representation in its AI training data. “A deeply important aspect of Clairity Breast is that it was developed with an intentional focus to reduce disparities,” said BCRF Chief Scientific Officer Dr. Dorraya El-Ashry.
Clairity Breast’s risk scores could prompt earlier interventions, such as MRIs, lifestyle changes, or preventive medications, while sparing low-risk women unnecessary tests. The platform is set to launch commercially in late 2025, with efforts underway to secure insurance coverage.
As AI reshapes healthcare, Clairity Breast represents a leap forward in personalized, equitable cancer prevention. “For more than 60 years, mammograms have saved lives by detecting early-stage cancers,” said Dr. Connie Lehman, Clairity’s founder. “Now, AI can uncover hidden clues to predict future risk.” With this innovation, the future of breast cancer care may shift from reactive treatment to proactive prevention—a change that could save countless lives,” or ruin them.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Vaccine shill out: Top member of CDC immunization committee RESIGNS
A top member of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) advisory committee on vaccines has stepped down amid a shift in the public health body's stance on the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) injections.
Leading pediatric disease expert Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos resigned Tuesday,June 3,as co-leader of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. In her resignation email sent to colleagues, she lamented her inability to "help the most vulnerable members" of the population. Panagiotakopoulos, who played a central role in shaping vaccine recommendations during the pandemic, insisted that her resignation was "a personal decision."
Her departure follows a controversial decision by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to remove COVID-19 vaccines from the CDC's recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women.This move marked a stark departure from the agency's previous stance, which broadly recommended updated COVID-19 vaccines for everyone aged six months and older.
Historically,such changes followed a formal review by the ACIP –a supposedly "independent" panel of experts that votes on vaccine recommendations before the CDC director issues final guidance. But Kennedy announced the change unilaterally in a video message with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.
The abrupt policy shift bypassed the CDC's usual advisory process. It also prompted criticism from public health advocates who argue the move undermines scientific consensus.
Shakeups in FDA and CDC spark vaccine debate
Panagiotakopoulos' resignation adds to growing turmoil within federal health agencies.In March, Dr. Peter Marks – a notable vaccine pusher – stepped down from the FDA.He accused Kennedy of promoting "misinformation and lies" about vaccines, painting the health secretary's actions as a "clear danger" to public health.
According to Marks, he had been willing to work with Kennedy to address vaccine safety and transparency concerns. "However, it has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary," Marks wrote. Nevertheless, his departure opened the door for Dr. Vinay Prasad's appointment as the director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
The CDC has since clarified that COVID-19 vaccines remain an option for children and pregnant women under "shared clinical decision-making" between doctors and patients. This nuanced shift falls short of an outright ban but reflects a more cautious approach.
Sources familiar with ACIP's internal discussions say the working group had been considering narrowing vaccine recommendations while maintaining broader use for high-risk groups, including infants and immunocompromised individuals. But Kennedy's intervention,however,preempted that process – leaving some experts frustrated.
Critics of the CDC's vaccine policies, including Nebraska chiropractor Ben Tapper, argue that ACIP has long operated with insufficient transparency and ties to pharmaceutical companies. "It's not evidence-based medicine, it's institutional groupthink backed by corporate money,"Tapper told The Defender.
Yet Panagiotakopoulos' departure has also drawn concern from those who see her resignation as a warning sign. "Her abrupt exit suggests internal fracture and quiet dissent," said GreenMedInfo founder Sayer Ji.
As ACIP prepares for its next meeting later this month, where it will debate COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, the fallout from these resignations highlights a broader struggle over the role of science in public health policy. Ultimately, one thing is clear: The debate over vaccines is far from over.
Watch Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announcing that the COVID-19 vaccines are no longer in the CDC's recommended immunization schedule for healthy kids and pregnant women.
https://www.brighteon.com/4047cc8a-f7a7-4578-a12c-25f525f9964d
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA – the regulatory facade – approved hundreds of drugs with no proof they worked – turning patients into unwitting guinea pigs
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), once regarded as the gold standard for drug safety, has devolved into little more than a rubber stamp for Big Pharma — approving hundreds of medications with shockingly little evidence that they actually help patients. A bombshell two-year investigation by The Lever reveals that the agency has abandoned its own scientific standards, fast-tracking dangerous and ineffective drugs while leaving patients to suffer the consequences.
Key points:
• 73% of FDA-approved drugs from 2013-2022 failed to meet the agency’s four foundational standards for proving effectiveness.
• 55 drugs met only one standard, while 39 met none at all — yet they remain on the market.
• More than half of approvals relied on preliminary data, with no proof of symptom relief, improved health, or extended life.
• Cancer drugs fared worst — only 2.4% met all criteria, while 29 met none.
• Pharmaceutical lobbying and political pressure have systematically gutted FDA oversight, prioritizing profits over patient safety.
The FDA’s accelerated pathway: A license for corporate greed
The FDA’s descent into regulatory negligence traces back to the AIDS crisis of the 1980s. Desperate patients demanded faster access to experimental treatments, and Big Pharma seized the opportunity to push for looser standards. In 1992, the agency introduced the "accelerated pathway," allowing drug makers to submit preliminary data—often based on unreliable surrogate markers—instead of concrete clinical outcomes.
One notorious example was AZT, an AIDS drug approved solely because it increased T-cell counts—despite failing to improve survival rates and causing severe toxicity. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) raked in $2 billion before the truth emerged.
Congress cemented this reckless approach with the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), effectively turning the FDA into a pay-to-play operation. Pharmaceutical lobbying skyrocketed, with campaign contributions doubling from 1.9 million in 1990 to 3.6 million in 1992—just before the bill passed.
Flimsy science, deadly consequences
The Lever’s investigation identified four basic criteria the FDA once required to prove a drug’s effectiveness:
• Control group comparison (placebo or existing treatment).
• Replication (at least two well-controlled trials).
• Blinding (patients and doctors unaware of who receives the drug).
• Clinical endpoint (measuring real-world benefits like survival or function).
Yet only 28% of approved drugs met all four. Shockingly, 29% met just three, and 9% met none.
Cancer drugs were among the worst offenders. Many were approved based on tumor shrinkage — a surrogate marker — while ignoring whether patients actually lived longer or suffered fewer symptoms. Avastin, a breast cancer drug, earned Roche $6.8 billion before studies revealed it caused blood clots, strokes, and organ damage — with zero clinical benefit. The FDA eventually revoked approval, but not before countless patients were harmed.
Vaccines: The untested elephant in the room
While The Lever’s database excludes vaccines, experts warn they follow the same flawed approval process. Karl Jablonowski, senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense, notes that vaccine trials often:
• Use fake placebos containing toxic adjuvants.
• Fail proper blinding, skewing results.
• Rely on antibody responses instead of real disease protection.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
VACCINE SKEPTICISM at an ALL-TIME-HIGH in Canada and USA after the CLOT SHOT CARNAGE from deadly mRNA Covid jabs
More than half of all Canadian parents are now completely freaked out over the health carnage that’s occurred post-vaccination from the hellish Covid jabs. The word about the deadly effects has gone viral and the world is finally waking up to the FACT that vaccines are a bioweapon for depopulation and chronic sick care profits.
1 Rising Vaccine Hesitancy in Canada: Nearly 50% of Canadian parents now express concerns about vaccine safety for children post-COVID, marking a dramatic shift from pre-pandemic skepticism levels (estimated at ~10%).
2 Safety & Efficacy Doubts Fuel Hesitancy: Among hesitant individuals, 66% cite fear of adverse reactions, while 33% question effectiveness. Reports of severe side effects and breakthrough COVID cases post-vaccination have amplified distrust.
3 Declining Childhood Vaccination Rates: Since COVID-19, infant immunization rates have dropped significantly, with only 55% of parents opting for flu shots and 24% skipping vaccines due to safety concerns—a trend linked to broader skepticism about public health narratives.
4 Calls for Transparency & Trust-Building: Experts emphasize the need for clearer communication from health authorities, as vaccine injury claims rise and debates intensify over mandates for low-risk groups (e.g., children). Rebuilding public trust remains a critical challenge.
Half of Canadian Parents Express Vaccine Safety Concerns Post-COVID, Survey Finds
A recent government-commissioned survey reveals that nearly 50% of Canadian parents are now concerned about potential vaccine side effects for children, marking a significant shift in public attitudes following the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings, published in the Childhood Immunization Coverage Survey Among Key Populations, highlight growing hesitancy even as health officials push for routine immunizations. Conducted by Advanis, Inc. for the Public Health Agency of Canada, the poll surveyed 5,113 parents nationwide, uncovering deep-rooted skepticism despite broad support for traditional childhood vaccines.
The report noted a "large shift in Canadians’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards vaccinations" since COVID-19, with 19% of parents strongly agreeing that they worry about vaccine side effects. While 88% still viewed routine immunizations — such as measles and mumps vaccines — favorably, only 55% opted for flu shots for their children. When asked why they skipped certain vaccines, 24% cited safety concerns, 22% deemed them unnecessary, and 14% doubted their effectiveness.
Despite these concerns, federal and provincial governments continued promoting COVID-19 vaccines for children, though the Public Health Agency itself did not formally endorse them. Meanwhile, Canada’s Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) has seen increased funding amid rising claims — a trend reported by LifeSiteNews. Federal data also shows dwindling uptake of COVID boosters, with most Canadians declining additional doses.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
BIG LIE: New Covid variant is DEADLIEST and MOST CONTAGIOUS one yet
Well, folks, the fake Bird Flu narrative is falling apart at the seams, and nobody seems to be worried about it or rushing to the doc-in-the-box for some toxic jabs, so the BIG LIE must shift to a new, deadly, horrific, fast-spreading Wuhan Cave Flu narrative. Yes, the new variant is spreading around the globe faster than Fauci can remove his mask after a plandemic press conference. Run for your lives. Lock yourself down. Cover your children’s eyes, ears and nose with something, anything. This is the big one. Sure.
• "Fake Bird Flu Narrative Collapsing": The article dismisses concerns about the new H5N1 strain as a "BIG LIE," suggesting it’s a manufactured scare tactic to shift focus to a new "Wuhan Cave Flu" (NB.1.8.1) variant, which it frames as another orchestrated plandemic.
• Accusations of Fear-Mongering: Critics are quoted alleging that health authorities — particularly the CDC and WHO — are recycling pandemic-era tactics (e.g., mask mandates, inflated case counts) despite questionable evidence of the variant’s severity or vaccine efficacy.
• Distrust in Institutions: The text amplifies skepticism toward public health agencies, referencing past controversies (e.g., Fauci’s mask policies, diagnostic accuracy debates) to argue that NB.1.8.1 is being exploited to control the public rather than protect health.
• Call for Alternative Narratives: The article urges reliance on "natural medicine" and alternative media (e.g., Natural News, Infections. news) to expose corruption in traditional institutions, framing mainstream COVID responses as threats to liberty.
New China Flu variant NB.1.8.1 is the “most transmissible” one yet, says the same liars who pushed the whole scamdemic 5 years ago
Health officials in California are urging vigilance after detecting a new COVID-19 variant, NB.1.8.1, which appears to be more transmissible than current strains. First identified in China in January, the variant has since been found in six U.S. states, including California, New York, and Washington, raising concerns about a potential surge in infections. While hospitalization rates remain lower than during previous waves, some physicians have called for renewed mask mandates — a move that has reignited debates over public health messaging and pandemic-era policies.
According to the California Department of Public Health, NB.1.8.1 now accounts for nearly 20% of COVID cases in the state, up from just 2% in April. The World Health Organization reports that it dominates over half of global variants. Despite its rapid spread, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has not yet added NB.1.8.1 to its public tracking dashboard, where LP.8.1 remains the dominant U.S. strain.
Health authorities maintain that existing vaccines offer protection, but skepticism persists. “We all remember when flu cases disappeared as COVID cases ramped up,” one critic noted, referencing past debates over diagnostic accuracy. Others have accused officials of fear-mongering, pointing to conflicting data on mask efficacy and pandemic-era policies.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
New Jersey on verge of expanding ELECTRONIC VACCINE REGISTRY, suspending consent during “public health emergencies”
In a quiet but alarming move, New Jersey lawmakers are pushing forward legislation that would automatically enroll residents into a statewide electronic vaccine tracking system — without their explicit consent. The bill, S1956, eliminates the requirement for written permission before adding individuals to the New Jersey Immunization Information System (NJIIS), effectively stripping residents of their right to medical privacy. This aggressive expansion of government surveillance follows a disturbing trend: the erosion of informed consent and the normalization of medical coercion under the guise of public health.
Key points:
• New Jersey’s S1956 would automatically enroll residents into a vaccine registry when receiving any immunization, removing the need for explicit consent.
• Opt-out requests could be denied during declared emergencies, outbreaks, or even the threat of an outbreak—granting unchecked power to health officials.
• Health freedom advocates warn the bill is a gateway to broader medical surveillance, enabling discrimination against those who refuse state-mandated vaccines.
• The legislation mirrors Gov. Phil Murphy’s COVID-era executive order, cementing pandemic-era overreach into permanent law.
• Vaccine skeptics and medical freedom advocates argue the registry will be weaponized to pressure compliance, punish dissenters, and segregate the unvaccinated from education, employment, and public life.
The slippery slope of forced enrollment
The NJIIS already tracks immunization records for children born after 1998 unless parents proactively opt out. But S1956 goes further — forcing automatic enrollment for anyone receiving a vaccine, regardless of age. While the bill technically allows opt-outs, the commissioner of health can override these requests during vaguely defined “emergencies,” including the mere threat of an outbreak.
“Now [people are] automatically put into a registry because of any sort of potential threat of any sort of outbreak, even if it’s inapplicable to why the person’s going in,” warned Sen. Holly Schepisi, one of the bill’s Republican opponents.
Dominique Venezia of Children’s Health Defense’s New Jersey chapter called the bill “one big tiptoe to grabbing more data, more surveillance, more track-and-trace.” She warned that rushed pediatrician visits — often just seven minutes long — leave no time for informed consent, let alone explaining registry opt-outs. “Do they even have to inform the parents that there is an opt-out option? I doubt they are going to do that.”
A blueprint for medical tyranny
Electronic vaccine registries are not benign record-keeping tools. They are enforcement mechanisms, enabling governments and corporations to monitor, pressure, and punish those who resist mandated medical interventions. Once fully implemented, these systems can:
• Restrict access to schools, jobs, and public services based on vaccination status.
• Share private medical data with insurers, employers, and other third parties.
• Enable targeted harassment of vaccine-hesitant families through “health and safety” home visits.
This is not hypothetical. During COVID-19, governments worldwide used vaccine passports to segregate the unvaccinated, barring them from travel, dining, and even medical care. New Jersey’s bill lays the groundwork for similar abuses, all under the pretext of “disease control.”
Rewriting the bill: A pro-freedom alternative
S1956 is a violation of medical privacy and informed consent, paving the way for surveillance and discrimination, and providing a basis for vaccine passports. The bill should be replaced with medical freedom provisions, enshrined into NJ law. These provisions should include:
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
ORWELLIAN CONTROL MACHINE: Again, CDC screaming for everyone to mask up on flights to flatten new Covid curve and push clot-shot VACCINATIONS
The CDC, Centers for Disease Continuance, will push propaganda to the limits in order to coerce the populace into getting jabbed up with any toxic concoction they dream up. It’s lab to jab, with no science to back up the “safe and effective” claims they’ve been spewing for 75 years. Now they want everybody wearing face diapers on all flights so that we’ll all believe that deadly Covid variants are floating on those aerosol particles and infecting the world, again, so we’ll all dash to the doc-in-tha-box and get stuck in the arm with the deadliest jabs ever created. Rinse and repeat.
• No Return to Mask Mandates Expected: Despite purported rising COVID-19 hospitalizations, public health experts and airlines confirm that mask requirements for air travel are unlikely to return, even as colder weather increases respiratory virus risks and the CDC pushes their propaganda again
• CDC’s Authority and Industry Pushback: The CDC’s 2021 mask mandate for transportation was struck down by a federal judge for overreach, and airlines have since maintained optional policies. Industry leaders oppose reinstating mandates, calling them ineffective and burdensome.
• Current CDC Guidance Focuses on Localized Risks: The CDC now ties mask recommendations to regional hospitalization levels — currently low in 92% of the U.S. — and denies rumors of impending federal mandates, emphasizing voluntary precautions instead.
• Public Sentiment and Pandemic Shifts Make Mandates Unlikely: Experts cite reduced pandemic severity and widespread resistance to masking as barriers to renewed mandates, though some high-risk settings (e.g., hospitals, schools) may still enforce them locally.
Mask Mandates Unlikely to Return for Air Travel Despite CDC Trying to Convince Everyone this is the Worst Variant Ever
Despite a recent uptick in COVID-19 hospitalizations in the U.S., public health experts and airline officials say mask mandates for air travel are not expected to return, even as colder weather raises concerns about another potential surge.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) first imposed a mask requirement for planes, trains, and transit hubs in January 2021, based on ZERO SCIENCE, and then a federal judge struck down the mandate on April 18, 2022, ruling that the agency had overstepped its authority. Since then, all major U.S. airlines have maintained mask-optional policies — and industry leaders indicate no plans to reverse course, except for the corrupt CDC “recommendations.”
While COVID-19 remains a public health concern, with thousands of weekly hospitalizations and hundreds of deaths, the CDC has emphasized that its current guidance is tied to localized hospitalization levels — which remain low in more than 92% of the country. A CDC spokesperson told Newsweek that recent rumors about impending mask mandates are "not true," reiterating that while masks are still recommended in some settings, enforcement is no longer a federal priority.
Major airlines, including Alaska Airlines, have confirmed they have "no changes planned" for their mask policies. Other carriers echoed similar stances, signaling that passenger and crew masking remains optional. The airline industry has largely opposed the reinstatement of pandemic-era restrictions, with executives previously criticizing mandates as inconsistent and overly burdensome.
Public health experts agree that a return to mandatory masking on planes is improbable, citing shifting public attitudes and the diminished severity of the pandemic compared to its peak.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻