16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The ousted ACIP members, in a desperate JAMA op-ed, whined about "destabilizing decisions." But as Witczak noted: "The media never asks why Americans lost trust. They’d rather protect the system than admit it failed."
The coming tsunami of truth
Havers isn’t the first to flee. Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, who aggressively pushed COVID jabs for pregnant women, resigned days earlier, admitting she could no longer "help the most vulnerable." Their exits signal a seismic shift—public health is finally being pried from Pharma’s grip.
Pediatrician Dr. Michelle Perro welcomed the shakeup: "This could be the first sign of a long-overdue course correction. The door is open for public health to return to its roots—serving the people, not the industry."
With Kennedy’s team now auditing vaccine injury databases and reevaluating mandates, the CDC’s house of cards is collapsing. Parents are waking up: Why are children given 72 doses of 16 vaccines by age 18 when measles and chickenpox pose near-zero risk to healthy kids? Why does the U.S. vaccine schedule dwarf other nations’ while chronic illness in children skyrockets?
The answers are coming—and the guilty are running.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
"The persistence of amyloidogenic fibrils years after exposure cannot be dismissed," McCairn wrote, urging independent scrutiny of vaccine safety data.
The reports echo past controversies over hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin suppression, as well as financial incentives for COVID diagnoses in hospitals. Critics argue these patterns reflect systemic failures in pandemic oversight.
As embalmers and scientists sound alarms, the long-term consequences of spike protein exposure — whether from infection or vaccination — remain hotly debated. With fertility declines, clotting disorders, and infant health impacts under scrutiny, calls for transparency and independent research grow louder. For now, the medical community faces urgent questions: Are these anomalies isolated, or signs of a broader crisis?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
In New York, the Bronx—home to lower-income, minority populations—endured far higher mortality than affluent Manhattan, despite their proximity. London’s Brent and Westminster boroughs mirrored this disparity. Crowded living conditions alone couldn’t explain the gap; the real culprit was medical mismanagement.
Hospitals became death mills, where untested treatments like mechanical ventilation—often administered recklessly—turned manageable illnesses into fatal conditions. Meanwhile, patients were denied family visits, proper nutrition, and early treatment options, accelerating their decline.
The evidence is undeniable: what was falsely labeled a "pandemic" was, in reality, a meticulously engineered assault on human freedom, dignity, and health. The staggering excess mortality witnessed across nations was not the result of a deadly virus running rampant—it was the direct consequence of government-imposed medical tyranny, coercive mandates, and systemic deception.
When human beings are terrorized into isolation and panic; when livelihoods are destroyed, purpose is stripped away, and financial ruin becomes the norm; when fraudulent testing, forced isolation, and the denial of early treatment turn hospitals into houses of suffering—it becomes clear that the crisis was never about public health. It was about control.
When fear-mongering turns mortality into a weapon of mass compliance; when hospitals operate under liability shields while medical errors skyrocket; when effective treatments are suppressed in favor of harmful protocols; when experimental injections are mandated despite their catastrophic failures—the truth emerges: the greatest threat to humanity was not a virus, but the very institutions entrusted to protect it.
The lockdowns, the mandates, the psychological warfare—these were the true drivers of excess death. The research proves it. The suffering confirms it. The lies expose it.
This was not a pandemic. It was a calculated dismantling of societal resilience, fueled by geopolitical agendas and corporate exploitation. If we fail to recognize the root cause—the medical tyranny that divided, sickened, and oppressed populations—we risk repeating history under even darker circumstances.
The pandemic was never about a virus. It was about control—about conditioning populations to accept medical tyranny under the guise of public health. The proof is in the data: excess mortality didn’t follow viral spread; it followed the mandates.
From ventilators to lockdowns to vaccine experiments that went awry, the real pandemic was iatrogenic. And until we confront this truth, the architects of this catastrophe will continue to evade accountability—while the victims remain nameless statistics in a fabricated crisis.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Big Pharma CEOs rake in millions in compensation while patients struggle with sky-high drug prices
As Big Pharma executives continue to amass staggering fortunes, patients face soaring prescription costs and dwindling trust in an industry that profits from lifesaving medicines.
Fierce Pharma released its Top 10 highest-paid pharmaceutical executives list for 2024 on Monday, June 16. BioNTech's Dr. Ugur Sahin topped the list at $287 million – nearly 10 times more than his closest competitor. Eli Lilly's David Ricks, who landed on No. 2, secured $29.2 million amid booming sales of weight-loss drugs Zepbound and Mounjaro.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla landed on No. 3 in the list, with his earnings rebounding to $24.6 million after the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) slump. AstraZeneca's Pascal Soriot, who pocketed $22.9 million despite investor backlash over bonus hikes, was in ninth place.
The eye-popping figures compiled by Fierce Pharma revealed an elite class of executives whose paychecks dwarf the average American's lifetime earnings. They also underscored a widening chasm between corporate profits and public health.
While Sahin's windfall came from cashing out stock options tied to BioNTech's pandemic-era mRNA vaccine success, Moderna's Stephane Bancel was conspicuously absent from the list due to his company's smaller market cap. He remains formidable despite his absence on the 2024 list after raking in $392 million in 2023.
Meanwhile, Johnson & Johnson's Joaquin Duato saw his pay drop 14 percent to $24.6 million – putting him on No. 5 in the list. J&J remains embroiled in costly talc litigation and lawsuits over its discontinued COVID-19 vaccine linked to fatal blood clots.
Big Pharma prioritizes PROFITS over people
Critics argue these payouts reflect a system rigged in favor of executives, even as drugmakers lobby aggressively against Medicare price negotiations. Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb, whose CEOs earned $23.2 million (No. 7 on the list) and $18.8 million (No. 10) respectively, are among those suing the government to block lower drug costs.
AstraZeneca and J&J have joined the legal battle, while the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America – the industry's lobbying arm – fights to preserve pricing power. Meanwhile, research shows top firms spend more on stock buybacks and dividends than on R&D, debunking claims that high prices fund innovation.
The trend isn't new. During the pandemic, executives at Pfizer, Moderna and J&J cashed out $250 million in stocks within six months of Operation Warp Speed, as per watchdog group Accountable. US. Bourla's net worth, estimated at $35.6 million, places him in the wealthiest one percent of Americans – a stark contrast to the millions rationing insulin or skipping doses due to cost.
As the pharmaceutical industry braces for more scrutiny, one question lingers. When will the pursuit of profit align with the promise of affordable healthcare? For now, the gap between boardroom bonuses and patients' bills has never been wider.
Watch AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soirot agreeing with U.S. President Donald Trump's order to lower drug prices in this Fox Business interview.
https://www.brighteon.com/cac59a4a-1bf1-4dd1-a492-da77c95c8410
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
“They’re still using Americans as guinea pigs,” Adams said. “Releasing a vaccine first and then studying it isn’t science—it’s recklessness.”
The Fight Ahead
Both experts urged public awareness and legal action to dismantle pharmaceutical immunity. Tenpenny’s book and ongoing lawsuit aim to challenge the status quo, while Adams highlighted AI’s potential to replace corrupt medical algorithms.
“The truth is coming out,” Tenpenny declared. “History will vindicate us—but how many more have to die first?”
Watch the full episode of the "Health Ranger Report" with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny @SherriTenpenny as they talk about covid vaccine injuries, turbo cancers, censorship, and the collapse of medical accountability.
https://www.brighteon.com/b129b2f1-f9c9-4bd7-be94-b91bb30eb5ec
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Yet Trump has framed these tensions as misguided, asserting that Israel’s survival is inseparable from U.S. strategic goals. Both men agree the U.S. must oppose Iran—a longtime adversary—but differ on whether Tel Aviv’s tactics enable, or hinder, that objective.
Competing visions amid rising flames
As rockets rain across the Middle East, the Bannon-Trump feud symbolizes a deeper struggle over U.S. foreign policy identity. Bannon’s “America First” prioritizes sovereignty and restraint, while Trump’s iteration leans into ideological solidarity and deterrence. The immediate stakes are dire: Iran’s counterattacks have killed dozens, and U.S. fighter jets now intercept Iranian drones alongside Israeli planes.
For policymakers, the conflict poses a binary question: Does Israel’s security justify risking American lives and resources, or is the alliance becoming a liability? The answer may define the next chapter of U.S. influence in a region where miscalculations routinely spiral into catastrophe.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Censorship and the silence of dissent
Critics allege a systemic chilling effect on dissent. In the U.S., proposals for mandatory vaccination mandates face backlash from freedom advocates, while social media platforms censors “anti-vax” content, creating what Coleman terms “a culture of intimidated inquiry.” A 2022 study cited by Lyman revealed online bot networks, allegedly funded by Russia, amplifying anti-vaccine rhetoric—a tactic critics say stifles rational debate by conflating genuine concerns with misinformation.
The U.K.’s NHS, which has committed to purchasing 65 million doses of unapproved COVID vaccines at 600 a piece, faces scrutiny for its financial ties to manufacturers. “Why would a government front $40 billion for an untested drug unless pressure exists beyond public interest?” questioned health economist Roger Carter, pointing to lobbying by firms promoting treatments like Remdesivir, a costly drug with marginal proven efficacy.
The cost of compromise
The journey from polio’s humble, unpatented vaccine to today’s incentivized vaccination programs reflects a troubling shift. Doctors, once revered for independence, now navigate a landscape where financial and corporate interests loom large. As Coleman remarks, “Medicine’s soul is for sale—and pharma is the buyer.”
For the public, the stakes are personal: How do people balance herd immunity with autonomy? Will transparency and ethics endure in an era of profit-driven health care? The answer may hinge not on vaccines alone, but on rebuilding trust in a system many feel has obliterated its moral compass.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The patent’s military connections also align with China’s documented interest in cognitive warfare. Elsa Kania, a defense analyst at the Center for New American Security, wrote in 2020 that PLA strategists view neurology as a battlefield tool, including tactics to "undermine an adversary’s capacity for cognition."
As investigations continue, the early vaccine patent underscores lingering questions about transparency—and whether critical details about COVID-19’s origins and effects were obscured in the pandemic’s crucial first months. For millions of survivors grappling with long-term neurological symptoms, the answers may hold both scientific and historical significance.
The unfolding scrutiny reflects a deepening divide between U.S. and Chinese narratives about the pandemic. With bipartisan calls for accountability in Congress, the patent’s implications could shape future policies on biosecurity, scientific collaboration, and global preparedness for the next outbreak.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Proponents of the ban argue that ads prioritize profits over patient care. A 2023 JAMA Network Open study found that ads drive demand for drugs with marginal benefits, while Medicare spends 60% of its drug budget on heavily advertised medications. Research also shows that ads encourage unnecessary prescriptions and risky behaviors, such as reduced condom use following HIV drug campaigns.
The bill aligns with broader skepticism of Big Pharma, echoed by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and even former President Trump. However, its passage remains uncertain—past efforts, including King’s 2023 proposal for a three-year ad moratorium on new drugs, have stalled.
The End Prescription Drug Ads Now Act reignites a decades-long debate over the ethics of pharmaceutical marketing. With public support for restrictions growing—51% of Americans favor a temporary ad ban on new drugs—the bill could signal a turning point in curbing Big Pharma’s influence. Yet industry resistance and legal hurdles loom, leaving the future of drug advertising in limbo. For now, viewers can expect more commercials—but the backlash is louder than ever.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Second University of Michigan scholar from China arrested for smuggling biological material
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has arrested a second Chinese visiting scholar affiliated with the University of Michigan (UMich) on charges of smuggling biological material into the United States.
According to an FBI affidavit, Chengxuan Han, a doctoral student from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, China, initially denied mailing any biological materials to a UMich laboratory between September 2024 and March 2025. But upon further questioning, Han eventually confessed to mailing materials containing biological substances, including nematode growth medium and plasmids – tools commonly used in genetic research and experimentation.
She also acknowledged providing false information to border agents, describing the contents of her shipments as innocuous items like plastic cups and books.
In line with this, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers flagged Han during a secondary screening at the airport. Han faces charges of smuggling goods into the country and making false statements to federal agents, charges that carry a combined maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.
Han was detained Sunday night, June 8, after arriving at Detroit Metropolitan Airport from Shanghai and was taken into custody after an initial appearance in federal court on June 9 in Detroit and will remain in detention until at least a June 11 hearing.
Investigators said Han was not directed by anyone to send the packages, and the recipients, two unnamed individuals associated with the UMich lab, are not currently facing charges.
Another Chinese UMich scholar was arrested for smuggling a dangerous biological pathogen into the U.S.
Han was charged just one week after the FBI apprehended another Chinese scholar affiliated with the same university for attempting to smuggle a dangerous biological pathogen into the United States.
Yunqing Jian, a 33-year-old UMich scholar, along with her boyfriend, Zunyong Liu, 34, allegedly conspired to illegally transport Fusarium graminearum, a fungal pathogen classified as a potential agroterrorism weapon. The pathogen causes "head blight," a devastating crop disease that affects wheat, barley, maize and rice. The fungus also poses severe health risks to livestock and humans.
Jian, who holds a doctorate in plant pathogens from Zhejiang University in China, allegedly received funding from the Chinese government. Investigators found evidence on her electronic devices indicating her membership in and loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Liu, who researches the same pathogen at a Chinese university, allegedly smuggled samples into Detroit Metropolitan Airport on July 27, 2024, while falsely declaring to CBP officers that he was visiting Jian and had no work-related materials.
However, a secondary inspection revealed concealed items in his luggage, including a handwritten note in Chinese, a round piece of filter paper with marked circles and four plastic baggies containing reddish plant material. Initially denying knowledge of the items, Liu later admitted to hiding them and acknowledged U.S. import restrictions.
Jian has been charged with conspiracy to defraud the U.S., smuggling, making false statements and visa fraud. Meanwhile, Liu, who reportedly returned to China, has not been apprehended.
Watch the video below that talks about CCP sending spies to America.
https://www.brighteon.com/8adff89c-103e-4960-b26f-8f355925b76a
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
New member of CDC’s vaccine panel previously testified against Merck’s Gardasil HPV injection in court
One of the eight new members appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) vaccine panel has previously challenged vaccine maker Merck in court.
On Wednesday, June 11, Kennedy terminated all 17 prior members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). He accused the dismissed ACIP members of conflicts of interest tied to pharmaceutical companies. The secretary then named eight new members to join the ACIP's meeting on June 25.
Among the new appointees is biostatistician Martin Kulldorff @MartinKulldorf, who previously testified against Merck's Gardasil vaccine in court. The Harvard University-trained epidemiologist served as a paid expert witness in lawsuits accusing the vaccine maker of downplaying risks of its human papillomavirus (HPV) injection. According to a court deposition from October, Kulldorff had billed plaintiffs $33,000 for his testimony
His involvement in litigation against a major vaccine manufacturer raises questions about potential recusals, as ACIP rules bar members from serving as paid consultants in cases involving vaccine makers. The CDC has not yet clarified whether Kulldorff will require a waiver to participate in Gardasil-related votes. Kennedy nevertheless defended his choice on X, calling Kulldorff a "leading expert in vaccine safety."
Gardasil, approved in 2006, generates billions in annual revenue for Merck. But critics, including Kennedy himself who previously organized litigation against the vaccine, argue its risks are understudied. Kulldorff's January 2025 report for plaintiffs cited flaws in Merck's safety monitoring, though a federal judge dismissed the case months later in March.
The ACIP's overhaul and the high-stakes battle over vaccine safety
The new ACIP lineup also includes high-profile skeptics of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) policies – such as mRNA vaccine technology inventor Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Retsef Levi, a researcher who called for suspending mRNA shots over myocarditis risk. The restructuring signals a dramatic shift in the government's approach to vaccine oversight, prioritizing critics of mainstream immunization policies.
Mainstream outlets quickly labeled some appointees "anti-vaccine," drawing ire from Levi. "The term 'anti-vaxxer' is gaslighting," he told journalist Maryanne Demasi. Levi reiterated that each vaccine "must be evaluated on its own data."
Kennedy's overhaul arrives amid escalating scrutiny of vaccine safety, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. His team pledged to review existing immunization schedules and demand "gold-standard" evidence for future recommendations.
Advocates like Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland applaud the "fresh start." However, critics like Dr. Paul Offit of the Food and Drug Administration's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee warned that the changes could erode public trust.
Offit, a vaccine developer and former ACIP member, took umbrage at the appointments of Malone and Levi. Nevertheless, he conceded that the other six appointments "seem reasonable."
The clash reflects a decades-old debate over pharmaceutical influence in public health. As the new ACIP prepares for its June 25 meeting, the nation watches whether Kennedy's panel will deliver on its promise of transparency.
Watch Dr. Martin Kulldorff discussing medical tyranny during the COVID-19 pandemic with the New American magazine's Veronika Kyrylenko in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/685dd0ce-4859-470a-a5c5-f8968b2a161b
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Escaping the drug trap: Root-cause healing
The real scandal is how medicine ignores proven, non-drug therapies. Autism Speaks admits that FDA-approved drugs don’t address core traits like sensory integration or communication struggles. Instead, children are drugged into submission while underlying issues—vaccine toxins, heavy metals, gut dysbiosis—go untreated.
Lyons-Weiler argues for "systems-level research" free from Pharma influence, focusing on detoxification, anti-inflammatory diets, and microbiome restoration. But as long as insurers refuse to cover these therapies, doctors will keep pushing pills—and another generation of children will pay the price.
Advice for families:
• Seek second opinions if drugs are pushed without thorough evaluation.
• Advocate for multidisciplinary care (behavioral therapy, OT, dietary support).
• Monitor side effects closely (e.g., weight gain, mood changes).
Non-drug interventions:
• Dietary: Gluten-free/casein-free (GFCF), anti-inflammatory diets (e.g., low sugar, omega-3s).
• Gut-Brain Axis: Probiotics, fecal transplants (early research shows promise for microbiome imbalances).
• Detoxification: Chelation (controversial for heavy metals; risks outweigh benefits unless lead/mercury poisoning is confirmed).
For reform:
• Stricter off-label prescribing rules.
• Insurance coverage for non-drug therapies.
• Independent research into root causes (e.g., environmental triggers, epigenetics).
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FEAR-MONGERING PLANDEMIC now underway featuring NEW Covid variant “Nimbus” fueling fake news headlines across America
Run for your lives America, the new “deadliest, most contagious” variant of Fauci’s gain-of-function flu is spreading like wildfire. Be sure to remain on lockdown in your home, close any small businesses (especially holistic ones), social distance at exactly 35 feet, and take any spike protein jab the “disease experts” on the Counterfeit News Network (CNN) and the World Hate Organization (WHO) recommend.
• "Deadliest, Most Contagious" Variant Fearmongering: The media and health agencies (dubbed "Counterfeit News Network" and "World Hate Organization") are accused of exaggerating threats like "Pirola," "Eris," and "Nimbus" to push lockdowns, business closures, and mRNA "spike protein jabs" despite questionable severity.
• Nimbus Variant Hype: The new Omicron subvariant "Nimbus" (NB.1.8.1) is framed as another engineered scare tactic, with its "razor blade throat" symptom and 10.7% global spread cited as evidence of ongoing pandemic theater—despite WHO admitting its "low risk."
• Anti-Vaccine, Anti-Mask Rhetoric: The text mocks public health measures, urging readers to ditch masks ("face diapers"), avoid mainstream guidance, and instead use "wormwood cleanses," vitamin D, zinc, and hydrogen peroxide gargles to "detox" from COVID "bacteria."
• Conspiracy-Driven Distrust: Claims the CDC/WHO are releasing "gain-of-function viruses" intentionally, with calls to follow alternative sites for "truth" about pandemic lies and Pharma corruption.
New COVID Variant "Nimbus" Emerges, Fueling Concerns Over Summer Surge
A new COVID-19 variant, designated NB.1.8.1 and nicknamed "Nimbus" by health officials, has been detected across the U.S., Europe, and the Western Pacific, raising questions about its potential impact as summer approaches. The World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed that Nimbus, a descendant of Omicron, was first identified in late January and now accounts for 10.7% of sequenced cases globally—up from 2.5% in March.
While Nimbus carries spike protein mutations that may enhance transmissibility, early data suggests it has not led to a significant rise in severe illness or hospitalizations. Symptoms include a notably painful sore throat—described by some as "razor blade throat"—alongside fatigue, congestion, fever, and, less commonly, gastrointestinal issues.
The WHO has assessed the global risk as "currently low," emphasizing that existing vaccines remain effective against severe disease. However, experts warn against complacency. Dr. Rajendram Rajnarayanan of the New York Institute of Technology told Salon that Nimbus is "a strong candidate for the summer surge," echoing concerns that the virus continues to evolve despite public fatigue.
Historical context underscores the unpredictability of COVID-19 variants. Since Delta’s emergence in 2021, successive waves have been driven by strains with increased immune evasion, though vaccination has blunted their deadliest effects. Nimbus’s spread follows this pattern, testing the balance between societal reopening and viral adaptation.
“I know that everybody wants to forget about this disease, but it’s not going to allow us to,” said Pharma shill Dr. Janko Nikolich of the University of Arizona College of Medicine, in a statement to ABC Action News.
As health agencies monitor Nimbus, the variant serves as a reminder that COVID-19 remains a dynamic threat, according to fake news—and one that demands vigilance even as the world moves forward.
Got a sore throat that feels like you’re swallowing a razor blade? That’s Nimbus. Better go get some wormwood parasite cleanse, plenty of vitamin D and zinc, and then throw your Covid mask in the trash and gargle with some hydrogen peroxide 3 percent to kill all that bacteria that huddled in your mouth, throat and lungs from wearing that face diaper.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Chinese researcher arrested for SMUGGLING biological materials into the country
In a case that highlights the risk of bioterrorism from Beijing, a Chinese doctoral student was arrested at Detroit Metropolitan Airport for allegedly smuggling biological research materials into the U.S. while concealing her ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Chengxuan Han, a researcher from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST) in China's central Wuhan province, was taken into custody Sunday, June 8. Her apprehension followed federal agents intercepting four packages containing undocumented roundworm-related materials sent to a University of Michigan laboratory.
Han was later charged with smuggling goods and making false statements. According to court filings, she initially lied to customs officials, claiming the packages contained plastic cups and a book. The researcher later admitted that they held petri dishes, nematode growth medium and plasmids, small DNA molecules used in genetic research.
Prosecutors allege Han deleted the contents of her electronic devices before arriving in the U.S., telling agents she wanted to "start afresh." Meanwhile, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) noted that Han – a CCP member – had shipped an estimated five to 10 packages, some of which were lost in transit. She described the contents of the packages as "surprises" for recipients unaware of their contents.
From campus to crime: How Chinese researchers exploit U.S. universities
The case marked the latest in a series of cases raising alarms about foreign interference in American academia. It followed recent charges against two other Chinese nationals accused of smuggling a crop-killing fungus, underscoring growing scrutiny of foreign researchers suspected of exploiting U.S. academic collaborations.
Jerome Gorgon, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, called Han's actions "part of an alarming pattern that threatens our security." He emphasized that American taxpayers should not fund "a [People's Republic of China]-based smuggling operation" at public institutions.
Historical context adds weight to the allegations: HUST has faced prior scrutiny due to its proximity to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was central to debates about the origins of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). The case also reflects escalating U.S.-China tensions over intellectual property theft, with universities increasingly seen as soft targets for espionage.
In 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice launched the "China Initiative" to counter economic espionage. Critics denounced the endeavor, arguing it fueled racial profiling – a claim officials deny, citing documented cases of Chinese researchers concealing their ties to the CCP and the People's Liberation Army.
Han's visa approval raises further questions. Initially rejected for poor English proficiency, she secured a J-1 visa days later after "speak[ing] credibly" about her research. Her work, focused on roundworm neural circuits, aligns with broader biological studies – but prosecutors argue the clandestine shipments violated clear import rules.
John Nowak, acting Customs and Border Protection director of field operations, warned that such actions "undermine the legitimate work of other visiting scholars." Meanwhile, Cheyvoryea Gibson, FBI special agent in charge for the bureau's Detroit office, dubbed the smuggling a "direct threat to public safety."
As Han awaits potential indictment, her case highlights the delicate balance between academic collaboration and national security. With China's aggressive pursuit of biotechnology dominance, U.S. officials vow heightened vigilance.
Watch China affairs expert Gordon Chang explaining that the smuggling of a crop-killing fungus into America is part of a concerted effort by Beijing against Washington.
https://www.brighteon.com/3c66345a-8dc6-41e7-8885-e2e6b19ab46d
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Psychiatric drugs linked to higher ALS risk, Swedish study warns
A groundbreaking Swedish study has uncovered alarming connections between common psychiatric medications and the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a devastating neurodegenerative disease. Published in JAMA Network Open, the research found that individuals prescribed anxiety medications faced a 34% higher risk of ALS, while antidepressants increased risk by 26% and sedatives by 21%.
The study, which analyzed more than 1,000 ALS patients, also revealed that these drugs correlated with faster disease progression and shorter survival times.
The findings may not be conclusive proof of causation, but they do raise urgent questions about the long-term safety of psychiatric drugs, particularly for the millions relying on them for depression, anxiety, and insomnia. With ALS remaining incurable and fatal, the study underscores the need for caution in prescribing these medications and highlights the viability of natural, non-pharmaceutical alternatives.
The hidden dangers of psychiatric drugs
The Swedish research team examined nationwide health data, tracking patients diagnosed with ALS between 2015 and 2023. To minimize bias, they compared ALS patients with healthy controls matched for age, sex, and socioeconomic factors. Strikingly, the heightened risk persisted even when medications were taken more than five years before an ALS diagnosis, suggesting a potential long-term biological effect.
Dr. Kimberly Idoko, a neurologist unaffiliated with the study, emphasized the grim reality of ALS: "Once ALS starts, we don’t have a way to stop or reverse it." The disease, which claimed the life of physicist Stephen Hawking, typically kills patients within two to five years of diagnosis.
The study’s authors theorized that psychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances might themselves contribute to neurodegenerative processes. Alternatively, the drugs could disrupt biological pathways linked to ALS, such as oxidative stress and immune dysfunction.
Faster decline, shorter survival
Beyond increased risk, the study found that ALS patients who had taken psychiatric medications experienced more rapid physical decline. Those prescribed antidepressants, for example, faced a 72% higher mortality risk post-diagnosis compared to non-users.
Daniel Glazer, a clinical psychologist, noted that psychiatric symptoms often precede motor dysfunction in ALS by years. "This research may shift how we think about long-term monitoring," he said, advocating for closer attention to atypical psychiatric patterns in at-risk patients.
Natural alternatives can make a difference
While the study stops short of declaring psychiatric drugs a direct cause of ALS, it reinforces concerns about their risks, particularly when safer, evidence-based alternatives exist. Psychotherapy, for instance, has been shown in multiple studies to match or surpass antidepressants in treating depression, with lower relapse rates.
Herbal remedies like St. John’s wort, lifestyle changes, and mindfulness practices offer effective, non-toxic options for managing anxiety and depression. A 1986 Edinburgh study found that psychotherapy patients had a 23% relapse rate after two years, compared to 78% for those on medication alone.
The Swedish study adds to mounting evidence that psychiatric medications may be beneficial for some patients but carry underpublicized dangers. With ALS already a death sentence for those diagnosed, even a modest increase in risk demands scrutiny.
Patients and doctors alike should weigh these findings carefully, considering natural and psychological interventions before turning to pills. This study adds to to the growing body of evidence that true healing often lies beyond the pharmacy counter.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Top CDC vaccine official resigns, fearing new ACIP members will expose flawed “science” behind toxic jabs
The crumbling facade of the CDC’s vaccine agenda continues to crack as another high-ranking official flees the agency, unwilling to face the scrutiny of truth under Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Dr. Fiona Havers, the CDC’s lead scientist on respiratory virus hospitalization data, resigned Monday, admitting she no longer trusts her own agency to use data objectively—a stunning admission that reveals the rot at the core of America’s public health institutions. Her projection - that the data is not being used objectively - is a confession of how she and her peers operated at the CDC for years.
For decades, the CDC has operated as a glorified marketing arm for Big Pharma, rubber-stamping dangerous vaccines while burying evidence of injuries. Now, with Kennedy dismantling conflicts of interest and demanding real science, the architects of this medical tyranny are scrambling for the exits. Havers’ departure follows the ousting of 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group notorious for pushing unnecessary jabs on children while ignoring the toxic burden of aluminum, formaldehyde, and other neurotoxins in vaccines.
Key points:
• Dr. Fiona Havers, CDC’s RESP-NET lead, resigned, citing fears data won’t be used for "evidence-based" vaccine policy under RFK Jr.
• Havers previously shaped COVID-19 and RSV vaccine mandates, promoting shots for infants and pregnant women despite known risks.
• Her exit comes days after Kennedy replaced ACIP members with independent experts, vowing to restore public trust in vaccine science.
• Drug safety advocates accuse Havers of hypocrisy, noting her silence during COVID-era censorship while now crying "lack of rigor."
• RSV vaccines pushed by Havers were linked to Guillain-Barré syndrome, yet still approved for vulnerable populations.
The great unraveling: CDC insiders flee accountability
Havers’ resignation email, obtained by CBS News, drips with irony. After years of presenting cherry-picked data to justify endless boosters for healthy children, she suddenly claims the CDC won’t uphold "scientific rigor." The truth? Kennedy’s leadership threatens to expose the fraud she helped perpetuate.
Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate and FDA advisor, blasted Havers’ selective outrage: "Where was that concern during the height of the COVID vaccine era? For someone who was central to driving policy through her data presentations to now raise alarm about lack of rigor—well, it says a lot about how the system only values critique when it suits internal narratives."
Havers’ work was pivotal in greenlighting RSV vaccines for infants, despite clinical trials linking them to severe neurological damage. Dr. Meryl Nass revealed: "Three adults in a trial of 6,000 developed Guillain-Barré syndrome. That should’ve killed the vaccine—but the CDC expanded recommendations anyway." Meanwhile, Pfizer’s RSV jab showed dismal efficacy in vulnerable groups while suppressing natural immunity in babies.
Kennedy’s purge: A reckoning for Pharma’s puppets
The CDC’s ACIP has long been a revolving door for Pharma consultants. A 2010 investigation found 64% of ACIP members had financial ties to vaccine manufacturers. Under Kennedy, that gravy train is derailing. Last week, he fired all 17 ACIP members, replacing them with critics of the bloated childhood schedule, including physicians who’ve witnessed vaccine injuries firsthand.
Corporate media predictably smeared the new appointees as "anti-vaxxers," but Kennedy’s mission is clear: "To re-establish public confidence in vaccine science." HHS Press Secretary Emily Hilliard confirmed the shift: "Vaccine policy decisions will be based on objective data, transparent analysis, and evidence—not conflicts of interest or industry influence."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
COVID VACCINES CAUSE MICRO-CLOTS that remain active after injected person dies, causing ALARM regarding blood transfusions from vaccinated individuals
Mainstream media, scientists around the world, the U.S. government, the CDC and the FDA all said it was a conspiracy theory to say that the Covid vaccines were some kind of depopulation weapon and biological means of genocide, but come to find out the spike prion clots that are killing people by the millions are proof in the toxic pudding that health enthusiasts were right all along.
• Micro-clots persist postmortem: Autopsies worldwide reveal unusual rubbery clots in vaccinated individuals, including young children, linked to spike protein-induced clotting. These micro-clots remain active after death, raising alarms about blood transfusions from vaccinated donors.
• Embalmers report widespread clotting: Over 60% of Tennessee embalmers report encountering fibrous, amyloid-like clots in corpses—averaging 17% of bodies processed—with spikes in micro-clotting (70%) and infant deaths (39%), suggesting a potential global health crisis tied to vaccines or infections.
• Spike proteins may trigger prion-like damage: Scientists like Dr. Kevin McCairn warn that spike proteins create misfolded fibrin resistant to breakdown, contributing to neurodegeneration, organ damage, and cancer. Clots retrieved from the deceased show amyloidogenic fibrin persisting months after death.
• Reproductive and pediatric risks emerge: Studies link COVID vaccines to lower IVF success rates and immune dysfunction in children exposed in utero, with cases of chronic micro-clotting years post-birth. Critics cite parallels to warnings about spike proteins attacking reproductive tissues.
Embalmers report spike protein-linked clots in corpses; scientists warn of global health crisis
A striking majority of embalmers and funeral directors in Tennessee have reported encountering unusual white fibrous clots in corpses, raising concerns about the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines and infections. According to the Tennessee Funeral Directors Association, 64% of professionals at their 2025 convention observed these rubbery clots — averaging 17% of all bodies processed — alongside micro-clotting (70%) and a rise in infant deaths (39%).
These findings align with research by Dr. Kevin McCairn, a neuroscientist investigating the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein’s potential to trigger prion-like disorders, where misfolded proteins cause organ damage, neurodegeneration and cancer. His analysis of clots retrieved from the deceased reveals amyloidogenic fibrin — a misfolded protein resistant to breakdown — persisting months after death.
"We have a global amyloidogenic health crisis," warned Jeanee Rose Andrewartha of Health Alliance Australia, citing the spike protein’s environmental persistence and links to sudden deaths, strokes, and heart disease.
A provisional study in Frontiers journal found lower live birth rates among vaccinated women undergoing IVF, particularly when shots were administered within 90 days of ovarian stimulation. Though the authors called the reduction "modest," critics highlight parallels to Professor Dolores Cahill’s 2022 warning that spike proteins may attack reproductive tissues, compounding risks from vaccines like HPV.
Dr. McCairn’s case study of a 3-year-old child exposed to mRNA vaccines in utero revealed blood abnormalities, including amyloid fibrils and micro-clotting, years after birth. The child, whose mother was vaccinated late in pregnancy, suffered immune dysfunction and chronic infections.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Medical tyranny, not COVID-19, drove global spikes in excess mortality, researchers reveal
The world was brainwashed with a lie—one so colossal it reshaped societies, dismantled freedoms, and left millions dead in its wake. Governments and health authorities insisted that a novel, highly contagious virus was sweeping the globe, necessitating unprecedented lockdowns, forced medical interventions, and the suspension of basic human rights. But what if the real killer wasn’t the virus at all? What if the spikes in excess mortality—the unexplained deaths that surged during the so-called pandemic—were the direct result of medical tyranny, not a viral outbreak?
Groundbreaking research from Canadian scientists demolishes the official narrative, exposing how pandemic policies—not SARS-CoV-2—were the driving force behind excess deaths. Their analysis of all-cause mortality data across the U.S. and Europe reveals a chilling pattern: deaths surged in lockstep with government interventions, not viral spread. Ventilators, isolation protocols, and institutional neglect became the true pandemic, disproportionately claiming the lives of the elderly, the poor, and the vulnerable.
Key points:
• Excess mortality spikes occurred simultaneously worldwide, defying the expected patterns of a contagious respiratory virus.
• Adjacent regions with similar demographics and cross-border traffic saw wildly different death rates, proving policy—not pathogens—was the lethal variable.
• Poor and minority communities suffered disproportionately, with hospitals and nursing homes becoming death traps under misguided medical protocols.
• The timing of mortality peaks aligned with government mandates, not viral transmission, exposing the iatrogenic (medically-induced) nature of the crisis.
Geographic anomalies expose the fraud
If COVID-19 were truly a fast-spreading respiratory virus, excess deaths would follow predictable epidemiological patterns—gradual spread from urban hubs to rural areas, with adjacent regions experiencing similar impacts. Instead, researchers found staggering inconsistencies.
Take Germany’s western border: densely populated regions in France, Belgium, and the Netherlands saw devastating mortality spikes, while neighboring German areas remained virtually untouched. "The virus would not stop at the border," lead researcher Joseph Hickey told The Defender. "People travel across constantly. The difference had to be policy."
The same phenomenon played out in U.S. cities. New York suffered catastrophic losses, while San Francisco—another major international hub—did not. If a novel virus were to blame, why did death rates vary so drastically in cities with comparable demographics, healthcare systems, and travel volumes?
Synchronized death spikes point to policy failures, negative impact of mandates, not pathogens
Perhaps the most damning evidence against the viral narrative is the eerie synchronicity of mortality peaks. Across Europe and the U.S., excess deaths surged almost simultaneously in March-May 2020—immediately after the WHO’s pandemic declaration—despite vast differences in regional infection timelines.
In Italy, northwest regions saw mortality rates seven times higher than central areas, yet both peaks occurred at the same time. This defies every known model of viral spread, which predicts staggered outbreaks as infections travel from epicenters to outlying areas. Instead, the data suggests a coordinated trigger: the rollout of deadly medical protocols.
The poor and vulnerable paid the highest price
The cruelty of pandemic policies was not evenly distributed. Researchers found that excess deaths clustered in impoverished communities, where residents relied on underfunded hospitals and institutional care.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Injecting chemicals is MORE DANGEROUS than eating them, so why is polysorbate 80 banned in ICE CREAM but allowed in VACCINES?
The double standards in the USA are deafening, blinding and mind-blowing, especially when it comes to chemicals and known carcinogens found in most vaccines that are banned in food. Wait, what? That’s right folks, they’re perfectly safe, according to the CDC, to inject into newborn babies and pregnant women, bypassing all body safety filters, including the skin, lungs and digestive tract, going directly into the blood and brain, but they’re banned in food because the FDA wants to “protect” you? Sure.
Chemical double standard: Polysorbate-80 is banned in food but injected into newborns – a dangerous practice
A growing scientific and ethical controversy has erupted over the use of Polysorbate-80 (PS-80), a synthetic emulsifier linked to intestinal aging and metabolic dysfunction when ingested — yet routinely injected into newborns through 22 different vaccines. While food regulators debate restricting PS-80 in processed foods, health authorities continue to defend its presence in vaccines, raising urgent questions about chemical safety standards and transparency in medicine.
A study published in Food Research International found that PS-80 accelerates cellular aging in the intestines by triggering "lipotoxicity," flooding cells with toxic fats and inflammation. Food safety experts, including those cited by KFF Health News, warn that emulsifiers like PS-80 damage gut linings and alter microbiome balance. Despite these risks, vaccine manufacturers dismiss concerns, comparing injected doses to "an extremely tiny piece of a raisin" — a claim critics call dangerously misleading.
Bypassing natural defenses
"The stomach can filter some toxins, but injection bypasses all barriers," says Karl Jablonowski, a senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense. Research confirms PS-80 is more toxic when injected, entering muscle tissue and the bloodstream directly. Pediatrician Dr. Lawrence Palevsky adds, "What ingredient needs to cross the blood-brain barrier in our children?" PS-80’s composition is also under scrutiny: It contains up to 355 compounds linked to hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis.
Infants following the CDC’s vaccine schedule receive PS-80 at birth through RSV and hepatitis B shots — despite having underdeveloped detoxification systems. A study in the International Journal of Medical Sciences suggests this could contribute to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Worse, undisclosed additives like organosiloxane, used to mask vaccine cloudiness, may amplify toxicity, per research by Dr. Arthur Brawer.
The contradiction highlights a systemic failure: PS-80 faces scrutiny in food but remains unchallenged in vaccines. Advocates urge parents to research ingredients, demand transparency and support detox strategies. "The time for blind trust is over," argues one advocacy group, citing rising autoimmune disorders in children.
The PS-80 paradox underscores a broken regulatory framework prioritizing industry convenience over child safety. As evidence mounts, parents are left to navigate a system where chemicals deemed unsafe for ice cream are injected into newborns without adequate scrutiny. The call for accountability grows louder—because when it comes to toxins, the dose doesn’t negate the principle: What’s unfit to eat should never be fit to inject.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Turbo cancers in children surge post-covid vaccines, experts warn
• Turbo Cancers in Children: Experts link COVID-19 vaccines to aggressive, rare cancers in kids (e.g., leukemia, colon cancer), with rapid progression from diagnosis to death—cases unprecedented in medical history.
• Vaccine-Induced Harm: Dr. Tenpenny identified 40 injury mechanisms by 2021, including immune suppression. Adams noted alarming hospitalization rates among young adults post-vaccination, calling it a public health crisis.
• Censorship Kills: Tenpenny and Adams faced coordinated bans by Big Tech and government-backed entities, silencing warnings. Tenpenny’s lawsuit alleges censorship violated free speech and cost lives by hiding risks.
• No Accountability: Pharma and officials evade consequences despite evidence. Tenpenny’s book exposes systemic failures, like liability shields and a dysfunctional vaccine injury compensation program paying minimal claims.
• Fight for Transparency: RFK Jr.’s HHS role offers hope, but new boosters lack safety data. Both experts urge legal action, public awareness, and AI to counter corrupt medical systems.
A shocking rise in aggressive “turbo cancers” among children—including cancers typically seen in older adults—has been linked to COVID-19 vaccines, according to experts Dr. Sherri Tenpenny @SherriTenpenny and Mike Adams. In a bombshell interview on Brighteon. com, the two health freedom advocates detailed how vaccine-induced immune suppression is driving unprecedented health crises, while government censorship has silenced warnings, costing lives.
Turbo Cancers: A Deadly Phenomenon
Tenpenny, a renowned researcher who identified 40 mechanisms of COVID-19 vaccine injury by mid-2021, revealed that pediatric cases of leukemia, colon cancer, and even prostate cancer are now appearing in children as young as eight.
“These cancers progress so rapidly that from diagnosis to death can be a matter of days,” Tenpenny explained. She cited the case of a young athlete who developed leukemia after a soccer game and died within a week. “This isn’t just rare—it’s unprecedented.”
Adams echoed her concerns, noting that his overseas R&D teams—composed of young adults—have faced alarming hospitalization rates post-vaccination. “I’ve never seen this level of sickness in people in their 20s and 30s,” he said.
Censorship and the “Dirty Dozen”
Tenpenny, labeled one of the “Dirty Dozen” disinformation spreaders by government-backed entities, is now part of a lawsuit against the U.S. government for First Amendment violations. She described how coordinated censorship between federal agencies and Big Tech platforms—including permanent bans from PayPal, YouTube, and podcast services—silenced critical warnings.
“They wiped my podcast account the same day I hit one million downloads,” Tenpenny said. “This censorship killed people by hiding the truth.”
Adams, whose company has also sued the Department of Defense and Big Tech, emphasized that the censorship was laundered through overseas NGOs to avoid accountability. “They knew these vaccines were dangerous,” he said. “Silencing dissent made them complicit in mass murder.”
No Accountability, Continued Harm
Despite mounting evidence, pharmaceutical companies and officials like Anthony Fauci and Xavier Becerra remain unpunished. Tenpenny’s new book, Zero Accountability in a Failed System, exposes how public health has been weaponized, from Medicare manipulation to the PREP Act’s liability shields.
“The CDC’s vaccine advisory board rubber-stamps every new shot,” Tenpenny said. “Meanwhile, the compensation program for injuries has paid just 40 claims—averaging $4,000 per victim.”
RFK Jr.’s HHS: A Glimmer of Hope?
The interview touched on Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s potential to dismantle the PREP Act and restore accountability. However, Adams criticized Kennedy’s recent approval of new COVID boosters without long-term safety data.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Bannon warns against “Israel First” in U.S. policy as Trump champions pro-Israel stance
As tensions between Israel and Iran surge, a sharp ideological divide has surfaced among conservative figures over the U.S. role in the Middle East. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon has urged the administration to prioritize American interests over Israel’s increasingly risky military campaign, warning of a potential broader war with Iran. In contrast, President Donald Trump has openly supported Israel’s preemptive strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities, framing the conflict as a defense against proliferation. The debate, unfolding amid Tehran’s retaliatory missile attacks and stalled U.S.-Iran talks, underscores a deeper philosophical clash over the "America First" doctrine.
Bannon pushes for U.S. sovereignty, warns of escalation
In an interview with the Financial Times, Bannon framed the U.S.-Israel alliance as transactional rather than indefinite. “They [the Israelis] are Israel First; we need to always be America First,” he stated, referencing their recent strike on Iranian facilities. He further criticized Israel’s aggressive tactics, warning of dire consequences: “Live by the sword, die by the sword.”
Bannon’s remarks reflect broader concerns among conservative national security circles about Israel’s military actions drawing the U.S. into a wider conflict. The Israeli raids, which targeted nuclear sites and high-profile scientists, follow five rounds of U.S.-Iran talks that collapsed last week. Tehran has denounced the strikes as unilateral aggression, vowing to retaliate persistently.
“What’s missing is a clear-eyed analysis of who Israel’s actions serve,” Bannon told the outlet, implying U.S. support for Tel Aviv may not align with strategic national interests. His comments are amplified by Russia’s renewed activity in the region, including President Vladimir Putin’s communication with Trump, which Bannon claims underscores the complexity of U.S. alliances.
Trump defends Israel, asserts “America First” control
President Trump has positioned himself as a steadfast ally of Israel, calling its strikes “very successful” and justifiable. In an interview with The Atlantic, he defended his interpretation of “America First” and stressed the need to prevent any Iranian nuclear capability, regardless of geopolitical costs.
“Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, very simple,” Trump said, adding that Tehran “brought this on themselves” by refusing to negotiate. He dismissed criticism from figures like Tucker Carlson, stating, “Who are the warmongers? They are the ones who let Iran get a bomb.”
Trump’s stance contrasts sharply with Bannon’s caution. When pressed on whether supporting Israel risked U.S. involvement in the conflict, he doubled down on strategic necessity: “Peace requires strength, and strength requires action.” The president also revealed a lengthy conversation with Putin about ending both the Israel-Iran conflict and the Ukraine war, hinting at a diplomatic approach even as missiles fall.
Eroding alliances and shifting priorities
The current rift mirrors past disagreements within the conservative movement over regional entanglements. Bannon, a vocal critic of the 2003 Iraq War, has long warned against open-ended U.S. military commitments. Meanwhile, Trump’s pro-Israel pivot since his 2016 campaign, including the 2020 U.S. embassy move to Jerusalem, has reshaped American foreign policy.
The ideological divide now extends to domestic priorities. Bannon recently accused parts of the right-wing base of fixating on Israel’s regional struggles while ignoring issues like border security and domestic radicalization fueled by Islamist infiltration. “The left uses open borders to import enemies,” he told rivals, arguing that Israel’s policy “distraction” weakens national cohesion.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Vaccine incentives and Big Pharma power: A crisis of trust in modern medicine
In 2025, allegations of financial conflicts of interest have thrust the vaccine industry into a new era of scrutiny. Doctors, particularly general practitioners (GPs), are accused of prioritizing financial rewards over patient welfare as they receive government-linked bonuses tied to vaccination rates. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies face renewed criticism for their role in shaping medical guidelines, promoting products like the HPV vaccine and shielding themselves from liability under programs such as the U.S. Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). At the core of this debate lies a deepening trust crisis: Are vaccines, hailed as pillars of public health, being promoted ethically, or have medical professionals become unwitting pawns in a corporate agenda?
Financial incentives and the “jab economy”
Dr. Vernon Coleman, a vocal critic, argues that vaccines have become a “business” rather than a medical service, with GPs squarely in the crosshairs. In the U.K., general practices receive payments of £12.58 per administered vaccine, including potential future doses for diseases like HPV and influenza. These incentives, Coleman claims, create a conflict of interest: “Doctors are being paid to prioritize jabbing over impartial medical advice.”
Reuters clarifies that such payments are structured to offset the administrative burden of vaccine programs, not to enrich doctors directly. Martin Marshall of the Royal College of GPs stated, “The payment must make this program cost-neutral for surgeries.” However, critics counter that systemic financial ties dilute medical integrity. Dr. Coleman starkly frames it as corruption: “They’ve sold their honor. A GP’s opinion on vaccines is now as reliable as a pharmaceutical sales rep’s.”
Safety concerns and the aluminum question
Beyond ethics, critics underscore vaccines’ safety profile. The HPV vaccine’s disputed risks mirror broader anxieties about additives like aluminum adjuvants and thiomersal (a mercury-based preservative), both linked by some researchers to autoimmune disorders and neurodevelopmental issues. Dr. Paul Offit, a prominent vaccine defender criticized for his industry ties, sparked outrage with his claim that infants could “handle 10,000 vaccines.”
Skeptics further note that vaccine trials seldom compare outcomes against unvaccinated populations, and many new vaccines are tested against existing formulations rather than inert placebos. “How can we call vaccines ‘safe’ without this basic evidence?” asked organic health advocate Laura Kryan, referencing cases where “vaccine injuries” are channelled into the VICP—effectively silencing lawsuits against manufacturers.
Pharma’s past haunts its present
Pharmaceutical distrust, once confined to debates over drug pricing and opioids, now bleeds into vaccination discourse. Stewart Lyman of the pharmaceutical industry noted how “scandals like opioid profiteering and inflated drug costs have turned the public against Big Pharma.” The HPV vaccine’s aggressive marketing, he argues, plays into fears of industry overreach: “The same actors criticized for greed now sell us ‘life-saving’ injections. It’s a hard sell after decades of broken promises.”
Historical parallels surface in comparing today’s vaccine push to 1950s tobacco ads. Coleman wrote, “[Pharma] has done what Big Tobacco couldn’t: bought the loyalty of medical leaders.” Meanwhile, industry giants like Merck face repeated fraud accusations, yet remain central to global vaccine supply—a contradiction fueling skepticism.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
PLANDEMIC PATENT: The China Flu scamdemic was well-planned in advance as the vaccine patent filed just weeks after the bat soup virus “emerged”
Natural health advocates around the world called it out right from the beginning of the pandemic, that it was all planned by communists and globalists to control the populace, take away their medical freedoms, get everyone injected with death jabs, and lessen the world’s population by a few billion. We were all right. Now, more proof is coming out as the patents for the deadly jabs were filed just as the virus broke and spread around the globe. Perfect timing, huh? Coincidence? We think not.
Early Chinese military-linked COVID-19 vaccine patent sparks scrutiny over pandemic origins
A Chinese patent for a COVID-19 vaccine, filed just weeks after the virus emerged in Wuhan, has drawn renewed attention from U.S. investigators probing the origins of the pandemic and potential early concealment of critical details. The February 24, 2020, application—submitted by three Chinese entities tied to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA)—outlined a "COVID-19 protein vaccine" and listed 11 inventors, including neuroscientists affiliated with China’s military. The timing and composition of the research team have raised questions about what Chinese scientists knew—and when—about the virus’s neurological effects, which were not widely recognized globally at the time.
The patent’s lead inventor, Zhou Yusen, was a senior military scientist at China’s State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity and had previously collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on coronavirus research. Zhou died under unclear circumstances months after the outbreak began. Also named on the patent were researchers Yan Li and Gencheng Han, both linked to the Institute of Military Cognition and Brain Sciences—a PLA division focused on cognitive warfare, which explores the military applications of neuroscience.
"Significantly, their published research provided limited, or no data of neuropathology observed in the experimental animals, or the neuroprotection afforded by the vaccine," wrote Dr. Robert Kadlec, a former Trump administration health official, in a 2023 report examining pandemic origins. Kadlec noted that the involvement of military neuroscientists suggested an early interest in COVID-19’s neurological impact—before such effects were documented globally.
The patent’s timing has fueled skepticism among U.S. officials. By late February 2020, the World Health Organization had not yet declared a pandemic, and Western researchers were only beginning to understand COVID-19’s respiratory effects. Yet Chinese scientists appeared to be developing a vaccine targeting neurological protection—a detail that aligns with later findings about the virus’s long-term cognitive impacts. Studies published in Nature and by Duke University in 2022 confirmed elevated risks of strokes, memory disorders, and sleep disturbances among survivors.
The revelations coincide with newly disclosed U.S. intelligence assessments. A Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) analysis from mid-2020—released via Freedom of Information Act requests—concluded that COVID-19 was likely genetically engineered, with elements traceable to a decade-old Wuhan Institute of Virology manuscript. The report described the virus’s spike protein as a "chimera," a term denoting hybrid genetic material.
Congressional investigators are now examining whether U.S. officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, downplayed the lab-leak theory early in the pandemic. Representative Darin LaHood (R-IL), a House Intelligence Committee member, framed China’s actions as part of a broader strategic rivalry. "China has a plan to replace the United States, and they're working at it every single day," LaHood said in a recent podcast. "They want to beat us technologically, militarily, economically and diplomatically."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Socialist cultist Bernie Sanders surprisingly introduces bill to BAN PHARMA ADS for prescription drugs on all TV, radio, print and digital platforms
How do you trust anyone who wants to turn America into a socialist hellhole? Socialism is simply the gateway to Communism and nobody has pushed harder for it than Bernie Sanders, but now he’s standing on a soapbox trying to push to ban prescription drug ads that have been around for 30 years, influencing people to “ask your doctor” if some venom-laced script is right for them. Does Bernie Sanders really care about the common folk being poisoned by prescription drugs, or is this just a ploy to regain some popularity so he can run for POTUS for 2028?
Sanders and King propose nationwide ban on prescription drug ads amid rising criticism of Big Pharma
Socialist senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Angus King (I-Maine) introduced federal legislation Thursday to prohibit direct-to-consumer advertising for prescription drugs, a practice currently legal only in the U.S. and New Zealand. The End Prescription Drug Ads Now Act would ban pharmaceutical commercials across television, radio, print, and digital platforms—including social media—marking a significant challenge to an industry that spends billions annually on marketing.
“The American people are sick and tired of greedy pharmaceutical companies spending billions of dollars on absurd TV commercials pushing their outrageously expensive prescription drugs,” Sanders said in a statement. “They want us to take on the greed of the pharmaceutical industry and ban these bogus ads.”
The proposed ban could disrupt a lucrative revenue stream for both drugmakers and major media networks. Pharmaceutical companies recoup up to five times their advertising costs in sales, while TV networks earn billions from drug ads—accounting for 30.7% of ad minutes during evening news programs last year, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Critics argue that drug ads distort public perception and medical decision-making. Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense, contends that pharmaceutical advertising buys favorable media coverage. “Drug companies use advertising to do more than just sell more drugs,” Holland said. “The billions Big Pharma spends on ads… guarantee that network news decision-makers will run only favorable news stories.” She cited the lack of critical reporting on COVID-19 vaccines as evidence of this influence.
The U.S. has permitted direct-to-consumer drug ads since the 1980s, following loosened FDA regulations. Initially, ads were required to disclose risks, but restrictions eased in the late 1990s, triggering a 330% surge in ad spending by 2005. Past attempts to curb ads—including a Trump-era effort to mandate price disclosures—were struck down in court.
The debate gained urgency after high-profile drug scandals, such as Merck’s Vioxx, which was aggressively marketed before being pulled in 2004 over links to heart attacks. Despite calls for reform, ad spending has ballooned, reaching $5 billion annually on TV alone.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Kennedy removes entire CDC vaccine panel in dramatic shake-up
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has removed every member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the independent panel that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on vaccine use in the United States.
The ACIP, which only meets thrice a year, plays a crucial role in the U.S. vaccine system by reviewing scientific data and recommending how vaccines should be administered. Its members are independent experts in medicine and public health who are not employed by the CDC and serve four-year terms. They are traditionally insulated from political pressures and not considered political appointees.
However, Kennedy, a longtime critic of vaccine policy and pharmaceutical industry influence, has frequently accused ACIP members of having conflicts of interest, raising concerns among vaccine advocates that he may push for the appointment of individuals who are significantly more skeptical about approving new vaccines.
"The public must know that unbiased science – evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest – guides the recommendations of our health agencies," Kennedy said.
He then revealed that the removals would allow the Trump administration to appoint its own members while criticizing the entrenched ideology under the former administration. "The prior administration made a concerted effort to lock in public health ideology and limit the incoming administration’s ability to take the proper actions to restore public trust in vaccines," Kennedy said.
The panel recently discussed the possibility of limiting Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine recommendations for children and was set to meet later this month to review and vote on those guidelines. According to a statement from HHS, the meeting will proceed as planned at the CDC headquarter in Atlanta.
Kennedy: A clean sweep is needed to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science
Kennedy has been facing mounting criticisms after removing the ACIP members, but he defended his action in his Wall Street Journal op-ed article.
In the op-ed, Kennedy acknowledged the political polarization surrounding vaccines but said the deeper crisis is one of eroding trust, not only in vaccines, but in the health agencies, regulatory bodies and pharmaceutical industry as a whole.
"Vaccines have become a divisive issue in American politics, but there is one thing all parties can agree on: The U.S. faces a crisis of public trust. Whether toward health agencies, pharmaceutical companies or vaccines themselves, public confidence is waning," he wrote.
Kennedy cited multiple government investigations dating back more than two decades that found weak enforcement of ethics rules, undisclosed financial ties and poor transparency within vaccine advisory bodies. He pointed to a 2000 congressional report and a 2009 inspector general investigation, both of which raised concerns about widespread conflicts of interest and insufficient oversight.
According to Kennedy, the overhaul is about restoring transparency, independence and scientific rigor. He said the new appointees will not be affiliated with the vaccine industry and will be expected to ask hard questions, challenge assumptions and prioritize public welfare.
"A clean sweep is needed to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science. Public trust has since collapsed, but we will earn it back," Kennedy concluded.
Watch this video of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. exposing the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines.
https://www.brighteon.com/a7011e6f-299b-477f-a9f1-b7f474c76766
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Study: Commonly prescribed psych medications linked to motor neuron disease
A groundbreaking Scandinavian study has raised alarming concerns about the potential link between widely prescribed psychiatric medications – including antidepressants, anxiety drugs and sedatives – and motor neurone disease (MND), a fatal, muscle-wasting condition.
The research published in JAMA Open Network suggests that even minimal use of these drugs – just two prescriptions in a lifetime – could increase the risk of developing MND by up to 34 percent. With nearly nine million Britons relying on antidepressants alone, the findings demand urgent scrutiny from medical professionals and policymakers.
For decades, Western healthcare systems have increasingly turned to psychiatric medications as a first-line treatment for depression, anxiety and insomnia. The United Kingdom alone prescribes antidepressants to 8.6 million people annually, while anxiolytics and sedatives are routinely dispensed to millions more. This study, however, casts a dark shadow over the long-term safety of these drugs, suggesting they may contribute to one of the most devastating neurological disorders known to medicine.
MND is a progressive and incurable condition that attacks nerve cells controlling movement. Other names for it include amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Lou Gehrig's disease, with the latter named after the eponymous baseball legend.
Over time, patients lose the ability to walk, speak, swallow and eventually breathe – with most patients dying within two to five years of diagnosis. The disease gained global attention through the late physicist Stephen Hawking (1942-2018), who defied the odds by surviving for decades with the illness – an extreme rarity.
The study's shocking findings
Researchers in Sweden analyzed medical records of 1,057 patients diagnosed with MND between 2015 and 2023, comparing them to a healthy control group. The results were stark, as seen below:
• Anxiolytics (anti-anxiety drugs): 34 percent higher risk of MND
• Antidepressants: 26 percent higher risk
• Sedatives and sleeping pills: 21 percent higher risk
Even more troubling, patients who had taken antidepressants before diagnosis experienced a faster decline in physical function and shorter survival times. The elevated risk persisted even when medications were taken more than five years before symptoms appeared.
While the study raises serious concerns, some experts caution against jumping to conclusions. Professor Ammar Al-Chalabi of King's College London warns that correlation does not equal causation. Genetic factors linked to mental illness may also predispose individuals to MND, meaning the drugs themselves might not be the direct culprit.
Despite the uncertainties, lead researcher Dr. Charilaos Chourpiliadis argues that doctors should monitor younger psychiatric patients more closely for early MND symptoms. Meanwhile, neuroscientists emphasize that untreated mental illness also carries severe risks, including chronic stress and inflammation – factors that may independently contribute to neurodegeneration.
While the study does not prove that psychiatric medications cause MND, it adds to mounting evidence that mental health treatments and the conditions they address may have far-reaching neurological consequences. For millions relying on these drugs, the findings present a painful dilemma: Risk worsening mental health without treatment, or face potential long-term physical consequences.
Watch this video about how ALS can be addressed with a holistic diet and supplements.
https://www.brighteon.com/f465372a-9c43-43d4-a6e0-027e0570f7a8
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Big Pharma’s chemical straitjacket: How antipsychotics and SSRIs are destroying autistic children’s minds
In America’s profit-driven healthcare system, children diagnosed with autism are being chemically restrained—not healed—by a cocktail of dangerous antipsychotics and SSRIs. These drugs, pushed by pharmaceutical giants like Johnson & Johnson and Eli Lilly, are approved for "irritability" but do nothing to address autism’s core challenges. Instead, they sedate, numb, and often push vulnerable children into psychosis, suicidal ideation, and violent outbursts—all while lining Big Pharma’s pockets.
The truth is, these medications are not treatments—they’re behavioral straitjackets masking deeper issues like vaccine injury, environmental toxins, and gut-brain dysfunction. Parents desperate for answers are being misled by doctors who prioritize quick-fix prescriptions over uncovering root causes. Meanwhile, the FDA rubber-stamps these drugs despite knowing their horrific side effects, from metabolic disorders to permanent neurological damage.
Key points:
• The FDA has approved only two antipsychotics—Risperdal and Abilify—for autism-related irritability, yet doctors routinely prescribe off-label SSRIs, stimulants, and sedatives with zero long-term safety data.
• Johnson & Johnson illegally marketed Risperdal to children, leading to billions in lawsuit payouts for side effects like gynecomastia (male breast growth), yet the drug remains widely prescribed.
• Polypharmacy—mixing multiple psychoactive drugs—is rampant in autism care, creating a dangerous "uncharted pharmacologic wilderness" with no clinical trials to guide safety.
• SSRIs like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil are linked to increased aggression, emotional blunting, and suicidal thoughts in children, yet they’re handed out like candy.
• Non-drug therapies—dietary changes, detox protocols, gut healing—are ignored because they’re not profitable for Big Pharma or reimbursable by insurers.
The Risperdal scandal: Profits over children’s safety
Risperdal and Abilify are FDA-approved for "irritability" in autism (e.g., aggression, self-harm), not core autism traits (social communication, sensory issues).
Key issues:
• Side effects: Gynecomastia (linked to Risperdal’s prolactin elevation), metabolic disorders (diabetes, weight gain), tardive dyskinesia (irreversible movement disorder), and emotional blunting.
• Ethical concerns: J&J’s $2.2 billion fine (2013) for off-label marketing to children and elderly populations, hiding risks.
• Lack of efficacy: Drugs may suppress behaviors without addressing root causes (e.g., pain, sensory overload, gut issues).
In 2013, Johnson & Johnson was fined $2.2 billion for illegally marketing Risperdal to children and the elderly, despite knowing its risks. Internal documents revealed sales reps were trained to downplay side effects like hormonal disruptions and weight gain. Yet today, Risperdal remains one of only two FDA-approved drugs for autism—a testament to Pharma’s stranglehold on psychiatry.
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, a research scientist, warns that these drugs "alter neurotransmitter activity broadly," leading to metabolic syndrome, cognitive stagnation, and even delayed puberty. Worse, autistic children are often prescribed multiple drugs simultaneously—antipsychotics, SSRIs, stimulants—with no studies on how these combinations interact.
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like Prozac and Zoloft are prescribed off-label for autism despite studies showing they worsen social withdrawal and emotional blunting. Dr. Michelle Perro notes that SSRIs "can induce agitation or even suicidal ideation—especially in pediatric populations."
The parallels to cases like Joe Wesbecker—who committed a mass shooting after Prozac pushed him into psychosis—are chilling. Psychiatrists like Dr. Mark Pollack admit that serotonin boosters can trigger violence in vulnerable patients, yet the FDA still refuses to mandate warnings.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
FBI Director Kash Patel warns of China’s long-term plan to “kneecap” the U.S. through FENTANYL
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel has warned of China's long-term plan to undermine the U.S. by deliberately fueling the fentanyl crisis.
Patel put forward the accusation during an appearance on "The Joe Rogan Experience" Friday, June 6. He revealed to podcast host Joe Rogan that Beijing's strategy of fueling the synthetic opioid crisis is a calculated strategy to "kneecap" the U.S. by targeting its youth. This, Patel argued, appears to be a "directed approach" by China against its "largest adversary."
The FBI director mentioned that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is not motivated by profit, but by a long-term plan to destabilize the U.S. by "taking out generations of young men and women" who would otherwise serve as soldiers, teachers and first responders. "That's what they’re doing when you wipe out tens of thousands of Americans a year," Patel told Rogan. "It's a long-term plan for them."
Patel, a key figure in the second Trump administration's crackdown on drug trafficking, also slammed China's deception. Despite pledging in 2019 to regulate precursor chemicals for fentanyl, Beijing continues to supply these through third countries like Canada and India.
This has contributed to a huge death toll, with data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealing that 48,422 deaths involving fentanyl were recorded in the U.S. for 2024. "They tricked the world," Patel said in the interview, noting that at least 14 alternative chemicals remain in circulation.
Canada now a key player in lethal fentanyl pipeline
A report by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) released last month mentioned that Chinese firms now reroute shipments through Canada. It added that so-called "super laboratories" in America's northern neighbor pose a growing threat. The DEA report noted that Canada's emerging role as a fentanyl hub suggests the crisis is evolving, not receding.
Washington's response has been aggressive. In March, President Donald Trump imposed a 20 percent tariff on Chinese imports linked to fentanyl production.
Meanwhile, the FBI under Patel has launched a global operation, collaborating with Indian authorities to dismantle precursor supply chains. Two indictments in January targeted Indian pharmaceutical firms Raxuter Chemicals and Athos Chemicals. The companies were accused of smuggling mislabeled chemicals into the U.S. and Mexico.
In May, federal agents seized 400 kilograms of fentanyl – the largest bust in DEA history. The operation also resulted in the arrest of 16 suspects, including Chinese nationals accused of importing pill presses to manufacture counterfeit drugs resembling candy.
Patel's warning extends beyond traditional drug markets. He noted that traffickers are now lacing fake pills with fentanyl and shaping them like gummy bears – deliberately targeting children. "We will not have kids dying of fentanyl overdoses in our streets," he vowed.
The war on fentanyl is no longer just about drugs; it's about national survival.
Watch David Teboul, assistant commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, discussing the influx of fentanyl from Canada to the U.S. in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/4eac358f-93eb-40b0-b875-b7678aed64fe
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. AXES all 17 members of CDC’s vaccine advisory committee, citing panel’s “historical corruption”
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the immediate removal of all 17 members of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) panel in charge of immunization, sending shockwaves through the public health establishment.
The environmental lawyer and vocal advocate for vaccine safety declared the move essential to restoring public trust. He framed the decision as a necessary purge of systemic corruption, as the ACIP's members have financial ties to Big Pharma.
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Kennedy accused ACIP of rubber-stamping vaccines without rigorous safety testing – particularly for infants and pregnant women. Kennedy added that over the coming days, he will appoint new members – physicians and scientists committed to "evidence-based decision-making." He insisted, however, that none will be "ideological anti-vaxxers."
The ACIP, responsible for recommending which vaccines are added to the childhood immunization schedule, has long been a lightning rod for controversy. Its influential recommendations have expanded the childhood vaccine schedule from a mere 11 shots in 1986 to as many as 92 today.
Central to Kennedy's argument is the claim that no routine childhood vaccine on the CDC's schedule was approved based on placebo-controlled trials, the gold standard for drug safety. Instead, many vaccines were tested against other vaccines or active substances, making it difficult to isolate risks.
The secretary dismantled a recent report from the fake news purveyor CNN claiming 257 placebo-controlled vaccine studies existed. He revealed that most either used non-inert comparators like aluminum adjuvants, or were irrelevant to U.S. licensure.
For example, a mumps vaccine trial (RCT 176) was not used to approve the current MMR shot. In another case, a flu vaccine study (RCT 124) showed higher hospitalization rates in the vaccinated group. "If we don't test vaccines against true placebos, we can't know if they cause more harm than they prevent," Kennedy argued.
Pharma industry, public health sector riled up with ACIP firings
Kennedy's move to terminate all 17 ACIP members has drawn fierce reactions. Voices from the medical establishment expressed outrage, while vaccine makers nervously watched.
Children's Health Defense CEO Mary Holland praised the move, denouncing the ACIP as a "rubber stamp" for Big Pharma. Dr. Meryl Nass agreed with Holland's sentiments. Nass, a critic of vaccine mandates, said the purge was "only a first step" in dismantling systemic bias.
The Infectious Diseases Society of America called the allegations "unfounded," while the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) labeled the firings an "unmitigated public health disaster." Notably, none addressed Kennedy's core claim about missing placebo trials.
Also, their criticisms were tainted. Journalist Paul Thacker highlighted the AAP's reliance on pharmaceutical funding, while lawyer Aaron Siri remarked: "When medical groups protest transparency, ask who pays them."
Vaccine maker Merck, which awaits an ACIP vote on its respiratory syncytial virus injection, downplayed concerns. But analysts noted that Kennedy's skepticism has already dampened vaccine stocks.
ACIP's history reveals deeper flaws, with the committee never rejecting a vaccine since its 1964 creation. Congressional reports describe an opaque appointment process, with members often holding pharmaceutical grants or patents.
Kennedy's overhaul marks a seismic shift in U.S. public health. "We will protect all children – from disease and from unsafe medicine," he wrote on X. Now, the nation is watching to see if he can deliver.
Watch former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield describing RFK Jr. as "the most consequential health secretary ever" in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/3a74c602-5c22-45da-b07b-f333ca13c12a
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A system built on fear, not science
The hypocrisy is glaring: If unvaccinated students were truly a threat, schools would provide alternative education. Instead, they’re abandoned—left to spiral without academic or social support. Kanthak traces this hysteria to the 2016 mumps outbreak, where vaccinated students spread the virus, yet schools scapegoated the exempt. One excluded teen later died by suicide, exposing the policy’s brutality.
Hayden Long’s story is a grim parallel. The Ohio honors student killed himself after a baseless suspension. "Rigid vaccine policies risk the same tragedies," Gibson warned. "We need compassion, not dogma."
The solution? Abolish mandates that treat kids as bio-hazards. Restore parental rights. And remember: A society that segregates children for refusing medical risks is one that has lost its moral compass.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia