19571
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
Dr. Suzanne Humphries makes bombshell appearance on Joe Rogan podcast, exposing vaccine industry deception back to POLIOMYELITIS
In a bombshell interview on The Joe Rogan Experience, Dr. Suzanne Humphries—former nephrologist and co-author of Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History—ripped open the vaccine industry’s darkest secret: legal immunity birthed reckless science.
Before 1986, vaccine makers faced lawsuits for injuries like Guillain-Barré syndrome from the 1976 swine flu shot. "They couldn’t even get insurance," Humphries explained. Their solution? Bully the government into a bailout. The result was the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, sold as "compensation for families" but designed as a kangaroo court that denies 70% of injury claims.
With zero liability, companies like Wyeth (now Pfizer) unleashed untested adjuvants, skipped saline placebo trials, and expanded the childhood schedule—all while profits soared. "Vaccines are tested against other vaccines, not placebos," Humphries noted. "The few saline studies show vaccines often increase susceptibility to the diseases they claim to prevent."
More key points on vaccine deception:
• Polio was never eradicated—diagnostic criteria were changed post-vaccine rollout, masking ongoing cases as Guillain-Barré, lead poisoning, or viral infections.
• Vaccine manufacturers admitted their products were "unavoidably unsafe" yet gained legal immunity in 1986, leading to lax safety testing and rampant use of toxic adjuvants like aluminum and mercury.
• Environmental toxins like DDT and arsenic—not vaccines—mirrored polio’s rise and fall; paralysis declined as pesticide use dropped.
• SV40, a cancer-linked monkey virus, contaminated polio vaccines and remains transmissible between humans today.
• Natural immunity and public health improvements (clean water, nutrition) drove disease decline—not vaccines.
• Modern vaccines are tested against other vaccines, not inert placebos, masking their true risks.
Polio’s vanishing act: a shell game of definitions
The sacred myth of polio’s eradication, Humphries revealed, is a semantic trick. "Polio is still here. It’s just called different names now," she said. Pre-vaccine, diagnoses required paralysis + viral detection. Post-vaccine, cases were reclassified as:
•Guillain-Barré syndrome
•Coxsackievirus
•Lead/mercury/arsenic poisoning
Other compounding issues with polio include:
•DDT poisoning: The real culprit behind polio’s decline? The phase-out of neurotoxic pesticides like DDT and arsenic. "The tonnage of DDT production exactly mirrored polio diagnoses," Humphries said. Countries still using DDT, like India, still report "polio." Meanwhile, the poliovirus itself is harmless in 95–99% of infections, as shown by studies of the Javante Indians, who carried immunity without paralysis.
•Then there’s the Rockefeller lab disaster: In 1916, researchers injected monkey brains and human spinal fluid into monkeys to create a hyper-virulent polio strain. An accidental leak triggered the deadliest polio epidemic in history—with a 25% mortality rate.
•And there’s bulbar polio, which was commonplace after children’s tonsils were removed.
•Studies of the Javante Indians showed 99% had polio antibodies without a single case of paralysis. This is because the polio virus is a commensal microbe, and the condition of poliomyelitis only shows up when the individual's terrain is compromised and their immune system is suppressed.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Scientists demand FDA withdraw mRNA COVID vaccines amid contamination and gene therapy concerns
A global reckoning: FDA complicity in a public health disaster
In a damning indictment of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a coalition of scientists, immunologists, and legal experts has filed a formal petition demanding the immediate suspension or withdrawal of Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The petition, now open for public comment, exposes shocking evidence of synthetic DNA contamination, regulatory fraud, and the deliberate misclassification of these experimental gene therapies as "vaccines"—a deception that has placed millions at risk of irreversible harm.
The petition, spearheaded by Australian law firm PJ O’Brien & Associates, accuses the FDA of enabling one of the greatest medical frauds in modern history. By greenlighting Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA injections without proper environmental assessments—a legal requirement for gene therapies—the agency allowed these dangerous products to flood the market under the false pretense of "emergency use."
"This misclassification denied Americans transparency and informed consent, violating federal law and rendering approvals void from the start," the petition states.
Among the petition’s signatories are prominent figures such as attorney Julian J. Gillespie, immunologist Dr. Jessica Rose, and virologist Dr. David J. Speicher. Kevin McKernan, chief scientific officer of Medicinal Genomics and the first to uncover DNA contamination in the shots, warns that the FDA’s silence is indefensible.
"How do they ever expect to regain the public’s trust?" McKernan asked. "They recently recalled some protein bars for a threat of peanut allergies, yet every American knows multiple people with COVID-19 vaccine injuries, yet the FDA is head-in-the-sand silent."
DNA contamination: a ticking time bomb in every dose
Independent studies cited in the petition reveal that Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA injections contain synthetic DNA at levels 6 to 470 times above safety thresholds, including SV40 promoter sequences—a known cancer risk. These contaminants, shielded by lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), can integrate into human DNA, triggering genomic instability, immune dysfunction, and malignancies.
• A September 2023 study by McKernan found DNA contamination 18 to 70 times above regulatory limits.
• An FDA-supervised study in December 2024 confirmed contamination up to 470 times over safety limits.
• German and French researchers have replicated these findings, proving this is not an isolated issue but a systemic failure.
"This is not just an American crisis—it’s a global reckoning," Gillespie declared. "Governments must act now to halt further harm and support those already affected."
FDA’s unlawful approval: rewriting the rules to protect Big Pharma
The petition exposes how Pfizer and Moderna exploited regulatory loopholes by falsely labeling their mRNA products as "vaccines" instead of gene therapies. Under U.S. law, gene therapies require rigorous environmental assessments—a step the FDA illegally bypassed.
"Had the FDA properly demanded Environmental Assessments, the American public would have been informed of the gene therapy nature of these shots," the petition states. Instead, the agency colluded with manufacturers to fast-track untested, hazardous technology into the arms of billions.
Dr. Jessica Rose minced no words: "The petition evidences potent facts that should lead to the suspension of use of these experimental nucleoside-modified RNA gene-based products."
As the petition lands on the desk of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the world watches to see if the U.S. government will finally hold the FDA and Big Pharma accountable? With mounting evidence of genetic contamination, regulatory fraud, and catastrophic health consequences, one question remains: How many more lives must be destroyed before the FDA admits its crimes?
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The Trump administration’s decision sets a crucial precedent. Government should not operate in a perpetual state of emergency, nor should taxpayer dollars fund indefinite bureaucratic bloat. By reclaiming these funds, the administration is restoring accountability and ensuring that federal health spending serves the public—not political agendas.
A return to fiscal sanity
The reckoning is here—and it’s about time. The Trump administration’s $11 billion cut sends a clear message: Emergency spending must be temporary, transparent and tied to measurable outcomes. Future administrations must follow this example, ensuring that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely rather than wasted on bureaucratic excess.
This move isn’t just about balancing the books—it’s about restoring trust in government and reaffirming that fiscal responsibility matters. The era of blank-check pandemic spending is over. Now, the real work of efficient, effective governance begins.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Despite surge in MMR vaccination in Texas, measles outbreaks continue: Is VACCINE SHEDDING fueling the spread?
Vaccine-induced shedding: a hidden driver of outbreaks?
As measles cases surge across Texas in early 2025, public health officials face an unsettling paradox: despite a statewide push to administer more measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccines, the outbreak has already eclipsed the total number of U.S. cases reported in all of 2024. With 309 confirmed infections—up from just 285 nationwide last year—the spike follows a 15,000-dose increase in measles vaccinations. But buried in decades of scientific literature is a rarely discussed phenomenon: the measles vaccine itself can spread the virus.
A 1995 CDC study published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology detected measles virus RNA in the urine of 83% of vaccinated children for up to two weeks after receiving the MMR shot. The researchers, led by Paul A. Rota, noted that viral shedding began as early as one day post-vaccination and persisted in some cases for 14 days. Similar findings were replicated in a 2024 Journal of Clinical Virology study, which identified shedding for 29 days in recently immunized individuals. This raises a critical question: Could aggressive vaccination campaigns inadvertently amplify community transmission?
"The vaccine virus is alive, replicating, and excreted," explains Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a nephrologist and vaccine researcher. "When you inject a live virus into a person, especially someone immunocompromised, that virus can escape into the environment."
Gain-of-function engineering: a more invasive measles strain
Compounding the issue is the MMR vaccine’s design. A 2016 study in The Journal of Infectious Diseases revealed that the vaccine’s Edmonston strain was engineered through gain-of-function (GOF) techniques to bind CD46—a receptor found on nearly all human nucleated cells. Wild measles primarily targets CD150, a marker on immune cells.
Original (Wild-Type) Measles Virus (Montefiore 89 Strain):
The naturally occurring measles virus primarily infects immune cells by binding to the CD150 receptor.
Lab-Modified (Vaccine) Strain (Edmonston Strain):
In contrast, the vaccine strain has been altered in the lab to gain the ability to bind CD46—a receptor found on nearly all nucleated human cells and present in much higher abundance than CD150. Because of this engineered adaptation, the vaccine strain of measles virus has the potential to enter a broader range of cells compared to the wild-type virus, due to its expanded receptor usage.
This manipulation means the vaccine virus can infect a broader range of tissues than its natural counterpart. Combined with prolonged shedding, the risk of vaccine-derived transmission escalates—particularly among the unvaccinated or those with weakened immunity.
Texas: a case study in failed containment
Gaines County, Texas, saw a 242% spike in measles cases after a health district distributed free MMR vaccines in early 2024. Now, with statewide cases soaring, health officials admit the outbreak is likely under-counted and expected to worsen.
Historical context sharpens the concern:
1966: Measles antigen was detected in vaccinated individuals’ urine for 16 days post-injection.
1995: CDC confirmed viral RNA shedding in children.
2024: Peer-reviewed studies extended the shedding window to 29 days.
However, with vaccine shedding well known for decades, public health messaging continues to blame the unvaccinated, ignoring the vaccine’s own role in viral spread. With measles dominating headlines in 2025, the Texas outbreak forces a uncomfortable debate: Are we trading short-term "herd immunity" for long-term viral persistence? As vaccine-derived cases mount, the medical establishment faces a dilemma—one that echoes the early days of polio, where the vaccine itself seeded outbreaks.
"When you vaccinate millions," warns biologist Dr. Stephanie Seneff, "you’re conducting an uncontrolled experiment on the whole population."
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
DEADLY DECEPTION: How COVID vaccines increased mortality rates and why authorities hid the truth
The COVID-19 pandemic will go down as one of the greatest medical betrayals in history. While governments and pharmaceutical giants assured the public that experimental mRNA vaccines were "safe and effective," mounting evidence now suggests these shots may have been deadlier than the virus itself.
The shocking numbers: Pfizer 14%, Moderna 20% higher mortality
According to an explosive analysis by researcher Steve Kirsch, Pfizer’s COVID vaccine likely increased all-cause mortality (ACM) by at least 14.3%, while Moderna’s shot was even worse, raising mortality by at least 20%. These figures are not wild speculation—they are derived from real-world data, including:
• Czech Republic mortality records, which found Moderna’s vaccine increased deaths by 20% compared to Pfizer.
• VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data, which showed 1.4 times more death reports per Moderna dose than Pfizer.
Kirsch’s method was simple: If Moderna’s vaccine increased mortality by 20% over Pfizer, and VAERS showed Moderna had 1.4 times more deaths per dose, then Pfizer’s shot must have increased mortality by at least 14.3%.
"That’s a train wreck," Kirsch wrote. "In short, the cure was far deadlier than the disease."
They don’t want you to know
The most damning part of this scandal is not just the alarming mortality rates—it’s the deliberate suppression of data.
• The Czech Republic published detailed vaccine mortality records, proving transparency is possible without violating privacy.
• The U.S. government, meanwhile, refuses to release similar data, leaving researchers to piece together the truth from incomplete sources like VAERS.
"It’s not a privacy concern," Kirsch noted. "The Czech Republic proved you could do it without any privacy problems whatsoever. I guess in the US, it’s better to keep the population in the dark when it comes to vaccine safety."
Where are the calls for accountability? "It’s not like you are hearing Senator Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren or Susan Collins or Bill Cassidy calling for data transparency," Kirsch observed. "That only happens in your dreams."
Real people, real deaths
A Rasmussen survey found that "nearly as many Americans believe someone close to them died from side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine as died from the disease itself."
This aligns with a Norwegian Medicines Agency review, published in The BMJ, which found that 36% of the first 100 post-vaccination deaths in nursing homes were "likely" or "possibly" caused by the Pfizer shot.
"Frail patients can benefit from vaccination," claimed Sigurd Hortemo, a senior medical consultant at the Norwegian Medicines Agency. "Nevertheless, the expert group believes that, for some of these frail patients, common adverse reactions may have contributed to a more serious course of their disease."
In other words, for the elderly and vulnerable, the vaccine may have hastened death rather than prevented it.
Echoes of past medical scandals
This is not the first time authorities have rushed dangerous medical interventions onto the public.
• Thalidomide (1950s-60s): Marketed as a "safe" pregnancy drug, it caused severe birth defects before being pulled.
• Swine Flu Vaccine (1976): Rushed to market, it led to Guillain-Barré syndrome in hundreds before being halted.
Now, history repeats itself. Millions were coerced into taking experimental shots under the guise of "emergency use," while dissenting doctors were silenced, and adverse events were downplayed.
Where are the autopsies?
Despite thousands of reported deaths post-vaccination, there have been no systematic autopsies using histopathology to confirm vaccine-related fatalities.
"They will never find what they refuse to look for," Kirsch warned. "Why aren’t Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and all the others calling for transparency?"
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
CDC finally halts $11 billion COVID funding scam as health officials admit the ‘pandemic’ was a fraud
The great COVID money train grinds to a halt
For over four years, the U.S. government and its corporate allies in Big Pharma and the medical-industrial complex perpetuated a multi-billion-dollar COVID-19 fraud — one built on false-positive PCR tests, exaggerated death tolls, and the suppression of effective treatments. Now, in a stunning admission of defeat, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is finally pulling the plug on $11.4 billion in COVID funding to state health departments, NGOs, and international recipients. This move comes two years after the Biden administration quietly acknowledged the "pandemic" was over—yet continued pumping taxpayer dollars into a crisis that never truly existed.
The CDC’s decision to withdraw funding is a tacit admission that the entire COVID-19 response was a manufactured crisis, propped up by emergency funds and fraudulent testing protocols. From the beginning, the PCR test — a tool never designed to diagnose active infection — was weaponized to inflate case numbers by using absurdly high cycle thresholds (CT values), ensuring a steady stream of false positives. Hospitals were incentivized to label deaths as "COVID-related," while effective early treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were suppressed in favor of deadly protocols like remdesivir and ventilator overuse.
Andrew Nixon, HHS director of communications, stated plainly: "The COVID-19 pandemic is over, and HHS will no longer waste billions of taxpayer dollars responding to a non-existent pandemic that Americans moved on from years ago." Yet this admission raises a critical question: Why did it take so long?
The truth is, the pandemic-industrial complex had no incentive to stop. As long as emergency funds flowed, health agencies, pharmaceutical giants, and testing laboratories had a financial motive to keep the fear alive. Even after Biden declared the pandemic "over" in a 2022 60 Minutes interview, HHS continued dumping money into COVID testing, vaccines, and global initiatives—long after the public had moved on.
Dr. Robert Malone, a pioneer of mRNA technology turned whistleblower, exposed the real reason behind the sudden end to emergency powers: "The bottom line is that the imperial U.S. administrative state will never give up these unconstitutional powers until forced to do so." Indeed, it wasn’t until congressional pressure mounted that the Biden administration reluctantly relinquished control.
Key points to consider for a phantom pandemic that won’t seem to die
• The CDC quietly ended its COVID-19 emergency funding, effectively admitting the pandemic was artificially sustained by fraudulent PCR testing.
• High cycle thresholds generated false positives, inflating case numbers to justify lockdowns, mandates, and dangerous medical protocols.
• Hospitals misdiagnosed patients, leading to deadly iatrogenic errors while suppressing effective treatments.
• The pandemic narrative would have collapsed in 2020 if not for billions in taxpayer-funded testing fraud and further investments into Operation Warp Speed.
For over three years, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) perpetuated one of the greatest medical frauds in modern history — a "pandemic" sustained not by a deadly virus, but by a rigged testing system designed to manufacture fear. Now, as the agency quietly terminates its COVID-19 emergency funding, the truth is undeniable: the pandemic was a financial and political construct, propped up by fraudulent PCR testing, inflated case counts, and a deliberate suppression of medical alternatives.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Lab leak confirmed? Boris Johnson’s stunning reversal on COVID origins sparks global debate
For years, the origins of COVID-19 have been shrouded in secrecy, censorship and political maneuvering. Now, former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson has dropped a bombshell in his new memoir, Unleashed, declaring that the pandemic was "entirely man-made" and likely the result of a lab leak in Wuhan, China. His admission marks a dramatic reversal from his earlier claims that the virus emerged from a wet market — a narrative aggressively pushed by global health authorities.
From wet markets to lab leaks: A political about-face
During the height of the pandemic, Johnson publicly blamed "demented" traditional Chinese medicine practices and unsanitary wet markets for COVID-19’s spread. Yet in his memoir, he now writes: "The awful thing about the whole COVID catastrophe is that it appears to be entirely man-made in all its aspects... Some scientists were clearly splicing bits of virus together like the witches in Macbeth — eye of bat and toe of frog — and oops, the frisky little critter jumped out of the test tube and started replicating all over the world."
This shift aligns with mounting evidence from intelligence reports and independent researchers. YouTube commentator Dr. John Campbell, a vocal advocate for COVID transparency, praised Johnson’s admission, stating: "I couldn’t have put it better myself... We actually know more by what is not said than what is said, because very often what is said is controlled."
The Daily Mail reported that COBRA, the U.K.’s emergency committee, had intelligence supporting the lab leak theory during the pandemic but faced a "deafening silence" from the scientific and political establishment.
The science behind the cover-up
A December 2024 U.S. congressional report concluded that COVID-19 "most likely" emerged from a lab — a finding Campbell @DrJohnCampbell attributes to China’s refusal to release critical data. Key evidence includes:
1 Gain-of-function research – The Wuhan Institute of Virology was conducting risky experiments enhancing viruses’ transmissibility and lethality, often with lax safety protocols.
2 Single origin theory – Unlike natural zoonotic outbreaks, COVID-19 appeared suddenly without an identified animal reservoir.
3 Early suppression – Whistleblowers and independent scientists were dismissed as conspiracy theorists, despite compelling evidence.
"Since the select committee commenced its work in February 2023, more and more senior intelligence officials, politicians, science editors and scientists increasingly have endorsed the hypothesis that COVID-19 emerged as the result of a laboratory or research-related accident," the report stated.
Historical parallels: Why this matters now
This isn’t the first time governments have suppressed inconvenient truths. In March 2020, a team of top U.K. scientists—including former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove and virologist Birger Sorensen—sent a classified briefing to Downing Street warning that COVID-19 was likely engineered. Their findings were ignored.
Professor Gwythian Prins, part of that team, revealed in a recent interview:
"We were dismissed as conspiracy theorists... Yet everything that has happened in the last five years has made me and the rest of the team increasingly furious, because our advice was not taken."
Their warnings were vindicated when even the New York Times and CIA begrudgingly admitted the lab leak theory holds weight.
The fight for truth continues
Johnson’s memoir exposes a disturbing pattern: scientific dissent was silenced, alternative treatments suppressed and lockdowns enforced with "medieval" severity—all while the origins of COVID-19 were obscured.
As Campbell noted: "Former prime minister seems convinced by the lab leak. I’m convinced. I think most of you are as well. Strange that a lot of aspects of legacy media seem to be still poo-pooing this self-evident belief."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Newly released JFK files reveal Pentagon’s role in creating Lyme disease and covid in the same lab
In a bombshell revelation, newly declassified JFK files have exposed the Pentagon’s decades-long bioweapons program, including the creation of tick-borne viruses like Lyme disease and the development of COVID-19 in the same military lab. The documents confirm what researchers like Kris Newby, author of Bitten, have long suspected: the U.S. government has been weaponizing diseases to destabilize nations and control populations. This chilling discovery raises urgent questions about the true origins of modern pandemics and the unchecked power of shadowy government agencies.
• Key revelations: The Pentagon created Lyme disease in the 1960s as part of a bioweapons program aimed at sabotaging Cuba’s agriculture.
• Same lab, same playbook: The Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Montana, where Lyme disease was engineered, also received DARPA funding to develop COVID-19.
• Masking bioweapons as natural outbreaks: The U.S. military has a history of disguising bioweapons as naturally occurring diseases, a tactic now linked to COVID-19.
• CIA involvement: The CIA has been implicated in funding and covering up these programs, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s work on coronaviruses.
The Pentagon’s bioweapons playbook
The newly released JFK files reveal a disturbing pattern of bioweapons development dating back to the Cold War. According to the documents, the Pentagon funded research at the Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Montana to create tick-borne viruses, including Lyme disease, as part of Operation Mongoose—a covert program to destabilize Cuba. The goal was to infect agricultural workers with debilitating illnesses, crippling Cuba’s economy and forcing regime change.
Mike Benz, a researcher who has extensively studied these programs, stated, “The military was funding the tick viruses in the same lab as COVID… It’s the same playbook.” This connection is further corroborated by Kris Newby’s book Bitten, which details how the U.S. military weaponized ticks to spread diseases that mimic natural outbreaks.
The parallels to COVID-19 are impossible to ignore. The Wuhan Institute of Virology, which received $15 million from USAID, was working on coronaviruses with DARPA funding. The same military lab that created Lyme disease was also involved in developing SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19.
Bioweapons as tools of regime change
The JFK files reveal that the Pentagon’s bioweapons program was designed to appear as natural disasters or local outbreaks. “We’ll create a bioweapon for regime change and we’ll loose it and we’ll claim that it was from natural origin,” Benz explained. This strategy was used in Cuba, where the military planned to deploy tick-borne viruses to destroy crops and starve the population, forcing them to overthrow their government.
The same tactics are now being used globally. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the CIA and military-funded organizations like the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensics Research Lab worked to censor any discussion of the virus’s man-made origins. “It was CIA proprietaries and U.S. military-funded censorship organizations who were the first people on the scene to censor COVID-19,” Benz noted.
The Rocky Mountain Laboratories connection
The Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Montana played a central role in both the Lyme disease and COVID-19 programs. Researchers at the lab collected ticks from the Rocky Mountains and infused them with “sublethal agents” to create diseases that would incapacitate but not kill their victims. This “humanitarian” approach to warfare was intended to avoid mass casualties while achieving strategic goals.
The same lab later received DARPA funding to develop coronaviruses capable of jumping from animals to humans. “The military was funding the creation of these tick-borne viruses out of the very lab that the DARPA grants to create the SARS-CoV-2 fur and cleavage sites would be used,” Benz said.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A global perspective: Not everyone agrees
Malone notes that most countries do not recommend population-wide annual influenza vaccination. According to a 2016 global review of national immunization policies, only 59% of World Health Organization (WHO) member states have a national flu vaccine policy, and even then, programs typically target high-risk groups rather than the entire population.
This stands in stark contrast to the U.S., where annual flu shots are heavily promoted for nearly everyone over six months old. Malone argues that this approach is driven less by public health necessity and more by the need to maintain influenza vaccine manufacturing capacity.
“You cannot build and mothball an influenza vaccine manufacturing facility for future use,” he explains. “You have to keep making influenza vaccines on a regular basis. And if you are going to make it, you need to have a market for the product.”
A call for transparency and informed consent
Malone’s essay is not an outright condemnation of vaccines but a plea for transparency, rigorous science and respect for individual autonomy. “I am an advocate for sound, well-justified medical practices,” he writes. “Vaccination is a medical procedure, and patients have the right to require informed consent.”
He calls for a shift in public health priorities, away from top-down mandates and toward personalized, physician-guided decision-making. “Making America Healthy Again will require respect for patients and their own personal bodily autonomy,” he concludes.
The bigger picture
Malone’s revelations come at a time when trust in public health institutions is at an all-time low. His essay challenges us to rethink long-held assumptions about flu vaccines and to demand better science, clearer communication and more ethical policies.
As Malone puts it, “Maybe MAHA [Make America Healthy Again] should think this through again?”
The question is: Will we?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The debate over foreign researchers in U.S. labs is part of a broader conversation about balancing national security with the need to attract global talent. While the U.S. has long benefited from the contributions of international scientists, the risks posed by adversarial nations like China have forced lawmakers to reconsider the cost of openness.
Watch this clip of U.S. President Donald Trump expressing worry about the DeepSeek AI from China.
https://www.brighteon.com/3e0d16c8-4737-407f-a05b-0cfe0e13f48e
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
While conservatives applaud these efforts to shrink the federal bureaucracy, critics warn that such cuts could undermine the government’s ability to support small businesses, particularly in times of economic crisis. The SBA’s pandemic-era Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), for instance, was widely credited with helping millions of businesses stay afloat during the COVID-19 lockdowns.
A detox period for the economy?
Bessent’s vision for a private-sector-driven economy has also raised questions about the potential short-term costs of transitioning away from government dependency. In a recent CNBC interview, Bessent acknowledged that the economy may slow during this “detox period” as it shifts from public to private spending.
“The market and the economy have just become hooked, and we’ve become addicted to this government spending,” Bessent said. “There’s going to be a detox period.”
Despite these concerns, Bessent expressed confidence that the administration’s deregulatory policies would ultimately unleash private-sector growth. “We are going to have safe and sound regulation to get our banking system going again,” he said. “So the banks should be generating loans to private companies. Employment should be from private companies, not from government, and I’m confident, if we have the right policies, it’ll be a very smooth transition.”
A golden age or a risky gamble?
As the Trump administration continues to reshape financial regulation and streamline government agencies, the question remains: Will this new approach usher in a golden age of economic growth, or will it leave the financial system vulnerable to instability and waste? Either way, the path we were on was unsustainable, so change was inevitable.
For conservatives, Bessent’s agenda represents a much-needed correction to years of bureaucratic overreach and politically motivated oversight. For critics, however, it is a risky gamble that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term stability.
One thing is certain: The battle over the role of government in financial regulation is far from over. As Bessent and his allies push forward with their deregulatory agenda, they will face fierce opposition from those who believe that government oversight is essential to safeguarding the economy and promoting social justice.
In the end, the success or failure of this new approach will depend on whether it can deliver on its promise of growth without sacrificing stability—a challenge that will shape the future of American prosperity for years to come.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The suppression of scientific dissent during the COVID-19 pandemic echoes the persecution of Galileo Galilei, who was forced to recant his heliocentric theory under threat of death. Just as Galileo's truth was eventually vindicated, the scientists who dared to challenge the COVID-19 narrative may one day be proven right.
As Ioannidis poignantly observed, "It would be shameful for me to just say I'm not going to work on this once I started working and doing my first studies in the field. It was something that could make a difference if we made the right choices or the wrong choices."
In the end, the COVID-19 pandemic was not just a public health crisis but a crisis of truth. Will humanity learn from this dark chapter, or will the suppression of science and the erosion of civil liberties become the new normal?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Despite these concerns, Japan continues to promote mRNA COVID-19 boosters, particularly for the elderly. The study highlights the case of a 26-year-old healthcare worker who died of a brain hemorrhage four days after receiving a single dose of the mRNA vaccine. Although her death was linked to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, Japan’s vaccination campaign continued unabated.
The Japanese public as unwitting test subjects
The study criticizes the rapid development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines, which bypassed the typical 7-10 years of testing. Japan has gone further than other nations by approving a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine, which has not been sufficiently tested for safety.
“A big problem with self-amplifying mRNA vaccines is that there’s no ‘off switch,’” Jablonowski said. “Once it’s injected, no one can control for how long or how much antigen your cells will be tricked into producing, potentially leading to immune dysfunction.”
The authors call for pre-vaccination medical checks, including blood tests and a review of a patient’s mRNA vaccination history, to better assess individual risks.
A global wake-up call
The study’s publication in a prominent journal like Discover Medicine underscores the growing concern over vaccine safety. Daniel O’Connor, founder of TrialSite News, noted, “A mainstream peer-reviewed journal is facilitating a critical examination of recent events, including the tragic deaths of three young children. Such incidents should not be happening, and a thorough investigation is necessary.”
As Japan grapples with these findings, the study serves as a stark reminder of the need for transparency, rigorous safety evaluations and a willingness to question established practices. “The Japanese public is now being inadvertently involved in clinical trials to gather data on vaccine safety and risks,” the authors wrote. “This must change.”
In a world where vaccine hesitancy is often dismissed as “anti-science,” this study challenges us to confront uncomfortable truths and prioritize the health and safety of all individuals, especially our children.
This article was written as a call to action for greater transparency and accountability in vaccine safety. If you value independent journalism, please consider supporting efforts to uncover the truth.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A 2022 Iowa poll found that only 34% of Iowans supported mandatory school vaccinations, underscoring the skepticism surrounding vaccine policies. Mahar added that while pharmaceutical companies and medical associations opposed the bill, it garnered significant public support. “If we could just restore accountability, the system would self-correct in a lot of ways,” she said.
Not everyone is on board with the proposed legislation. Critics argue that stripping vaccine manufacturers of liability protections could lead to higher costs, reduced access to vaccines and even a withdrawal of vaccines from the Iowa market. Jack Ohringer, a medical student at the University of Iowa, warned that the bill could “open the floodgates for unfounded vaccination injury claims,” ultimately harming public health.
A broader conversation
While the bill’s future remains uncertain, its introduction has already sparked a much-needed conversation about accountability, public health and individual rights. Rep. Thomson acknowledged the complexity of the issue, stating, “While vaccines are a tremendous medical advance, there has to be some control for toxic products that get into the stream of commerce. The federal system, pretty clearly, is not working right now. If there’s a state solution to a broken system on the federal level, let’s see if we can find it.”
As the debate continues, one thing is clear: the push for vaccine accountability is gaining momentum, and Iowa’s bold move could set the stage for a national reckoning with the pharmaceutical industry’s liability shield. Whether the bill becomes law or not, it has already succeeded in shining a light on a system that many believe is long overdue for reform.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The next step for researchers is to optimize these compounds through structural modifications, enhancing their efficacy and reducing potential side effects. If successful, these compounds could join the ranks of other plant-derived drugs, such as paclitaxel (derived from the Pacific yew tree) and artemisinin (from sweet wormwood), which have transformed cancer and malaria treatment, respectively.
As the world continues to grapple with infectious diseases, the discovery of anti-HIV compounds in D. pseudomezereum raises an important question: How many other life-saving remedies are hidden in the natural world, waiting to be uncovered?
In the words of renowned ethnobotanist Richard Evans Schultes, “The plant kingdom is a vast reservoir of chemical compounds, many of which have yet to be discovered and understood.” Perhaps, in the leaves, bark, and fruits of plants like D. pseudomezereum, we will find the keys to unlocking a healthier future.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Ending a reckless genetic experiment that should have never been approved in the first place
The so-called "COVID vaccines" were never vaccines—they were unproven, reckless genetic experiments forced upon the public under the guise of emergency use. These mRNA-based injections, fraudulently marketed as life-saving, were in fact biological weapons that corrupted human cellular machinery, forcing cells to produce a foreign, toxic spike protein with devastating consequences.
From the outset, these injections should have never been authorized, let alone mandated. Clinical trials were rushed, safety signals ignored, and adverse effects brushed aside as "rare" while thousands suffered heart damage, neurological disorders, and immune dysfunction. Worse still, these shots failed at their only claimed purpose—providing immunity. Breakthrough infections exploded, proving these were never vaccines, but a dangerous, unstable genetic weapon system masquerading as medicine.
The damage is irreversible for countless victims. A mere withdrawal of these shots is not enough. We demand full judicial accountability—criminal prosecutions for those who pushed this atrocity, a new compensation system for the injured, and the complete dismantling of the corrupt regulatory bodies that allowed this.
The COVID vaccine scandal is one of the greatest medical crimes in history. Those responsible must pay. Medical freedom is non-negotiable—never again.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
“The shame of Minnesota”: Somali immigrants behind $250 million child nutrition fraud in largest COVID-era scam
In what federal prosecutors call "the largest COVID fraud case in U.S. history," a network of Somali immigrants allegedly siphoned $250 million from a federal program meant to feed hungry children. The scheme, centered around a sham nonprofit called Feeding Our Future, exploited pandemic-era funding waivers, submitting fabricated meal counts and rosters to the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE). Of the 70 individuals charged, nearly all are Somali refugees, with 37 pleading guilty and 7 convicted so far. The case exposes a staggering betrayal of public trust—one that raises troubling questions about immigrant assimilation, government oversight, and the vulnerabilities of welfare systems.
A perfect storm: how the fraud unfolded
Between March 2020 and January 2022, Aimee Bock, the executive director of Feeding Our Future, and her mostly Somali co-conspirators filed false claims for reimbursement, claiming to serve meals to thousands of children who didn’t exist. The MDE, operating under relaxed COVID-era rules, rubber-stamped the fraudulent submissions, even as red flags mounted.
• Fake meal counts: Some sites claimed to serve 5,000 children daily—more than entire school districts.
• Nonexistent board members: Feeding Our Future listed bartenders and a small-engine mechanic as board members, none of whom knew they were involved.
• Lavish spending: Defendants bought luxury cars, homes in multiple states, and properties in Kenya and Turkey with stolen funds.
A whistleblower from the MDE alerted the FBI in April 2021, leading to surveillance that revealed empty food sites where thousands of meals were supposedly served daily. By January 2022, federal agents raided locations across the Twin Cities in Minnesota’s largest-ever fraud bust.
Cultural & Political Context
• Minnesota has the largest Somali population in North America (100,000+), many arriving as refugees since the 1990s.
• Minnesota's liberal welfare policies and lax oversight enabled fraud.
• Some Somali immigrants have been linked to terrorism recruitment (ISIS, al-Shabab), though this case involves financial crime, not extremism.
• The Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) ignored red flags, allegedly due to fears of being accused of racism.
• Federal waivers during COVID made fraud easier.
• Governor Tim Walz and AG Keith Ellison (both Democrats) were criticized for not acting sooner.
• Abdihakim Osman Nur, a Somali immigrant, exposed corruption after witnessing $100,000 in gold gifts given to a Feeding Our Future employee at a wedding. His testimony helped prosecutors.
The fallout: Who pays the price?
While most defendants eagerly participated, one Somali immigrant, Abdihakim Osman Nur, publicly condemned the fraud. In a Facebook post, he described a Feeding Our Future staffer’s wedding, where vendors gifted the bride $10,000 in gold trays—paid for with stolen funds.
"We cannot close our eyes to such corruption... when we only have a few bad apples," Nur wrote.
Yet state officials remained silent. Governor Tim Walz claimed they "caught it very early" but refused to answer follow-up questions. Attorney General Keith Ellison, who once boasted "I know a scam when I see one," also declined to comment.
The case has left Minnesota reeling, with prosecutors calling it "the shame of Minnesota." Yet it also raises deeper questions:
• Why did oversight fail so spectacularly?
• Did political correctness prevent officials from acting sooner?
• Will this case change how refugee resettlement and welfare programs operate?
As Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson declared after the convictions: "This fraud is gross, disgusting, and despicable." But beyond the legal consequences, the scandal serves as a cautionary tale—one that forces us to ask: When generosity meets exploitation, who really suffers?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Trump administration cuts $11 billion in COVID-era public health slush funds: Ending the era of waste and abuse
The Trump administration has taken decisive action to rein in government bloat by terminating $11 billion in unspent or misallocated COVID-era public health grants, signaling a long-overdue return to fiscal responsibility. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) confirmed this week that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will recover billions in taxpayer dollars—money that had been sitting idle or funneled into questionable programs far removed from genuine public health needs.
A reckoning for pandemic excess
For years, conservative watchdogs warned that COVID relief funds were being mismanaged, propping up bloated bureaucracies and politically motivated initiatives rather than addressing urgent health crises. The Trump administration’s decision to claw back these funds is not merely a cost-cutting measure—it’s a necessary correction to years of unchecked spending.
"The COVID-19 pandemic is over, and HHS will no longer waste billions of taxpayer dollars responding to a crisis that Americans moved on from years ago," said HHS Director of Communications Andrew Nixon.
This isn’t the first time a Republican administration has had to clean up after Democratic fiscal irresponsibility. The Obama-era stimulus packages were notorious for funding pet projects like turtle tunnels and solar-powered sidewalks, while the Biden administration’s COVID spending spree—totaling trillions—fueled inflation and economic instability while lining the pockets of special interests.
State health departments resist accountability
Unsurprisingly, state health officials—accustomed to blank checks during the pandemic—are now protesting the cuts. Rhode Island’s Department of Health spokesperson Joseph Wendelken claimed the funding supported "critical work" beyond COVID, but details on how these funds were actually used remain scarce. Were they improving public health, or merely expanding bureaucracy?
Some states, however, are adjusting pragmatically. Alabama’s Arrol Sheehan acknowledged that temporary emergency funds were never meant to last forever, stating, "ADPH has already made staffing and budget adjustments to accommodate changes in funding." Meanwhile, the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) is reportedly preparing for layoffs—proof that many agencies became dependent on crisis funding rather than sustainable budgets.
Refocusing on long-term priorities
The Trump administration’s move aligns with a broader effort to shift federal health spending toward long-term priorities, such as chronic disease prevention, under the "Make America Healthy Again" initiative. This stands in stark contrast to the Biden administration’s approach, which extended emergency declarations long after the crisis had passed, effectively turning temporary measures into permanent entitlements.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already eliminated millions in dubious grants, including funding for politically charged initiatives like "vaccine hesitancy" studies and LGBTQ-focused health programs—many of which appeared more ideological than medically necessary. An internal CDC review confirmed that the $11 billion in cuts targeted wasteful or redundant spending, validating conservative criticisms that pandemic-era funding spiraled out of control.
Why this matters now
The COVID-19 pandemic was a crisis, but it also became an excuse for unprecedented government expansion. Emergency powers justified sweeping mandates, prolonged school closures and massive spending with minimal oversight. Now, as the nation moves forward, a critical question remains: How much of that spending was truly essential?
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A reckoning must come
The evidence is mounting. The vaccines may have killed more people than they saved, especially among the elderly and frail. Yet, instead of transparency, people get censorship, deflection and denial.
Will there ever be accountability? Or will this go down as another dark chapter in medical history—where profit and power trumped human lives?
One thing is clear: The truth cannot stay buried forever.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
From the beginning, the CDC and its corporate partners weaponized the PCR test, using absurdly high cycle thresholds (CT) to generate false positives. Laboratories routinely ran tests at 35-45 CT, far beyond the scientifically valid threshold of 25-30, ensuring that harmless viral debris—often indistinguishable from common coronaviruses—was mislabeled as "COVID-19." This deception allowed governments to justify lockdowns, mask mandates, and ultimately, the rollout of experimental mRNA injections.
The PCR deception: how false positives fueled a fake pandemic
The PCR test was never intended as a diagnostic tool. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, repeatedly warned that it could not determine infection or illness. Yet the CDC exploited this flaw, instructing labs to use high CT values that detected meaningless genetic fragments.
• A 2020 New York Times investigation revealed that up to 90% of "positive" cases at 40 CT were likely false.
• Portugal’s Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that PCR tests were unreliable for diagnosing COVID-19.
• The WHO quietly admitted in 2021 that high CT values distorted results, yet the CDC continued the charade.
Had the CDC used scientifically valid testing standards, and symptom specific diagnostic criteria, and admitted to multiple mutations of the original strain, the pandemic would have vanished by mid-2020. Instead, hospitals were incentivized to label every death as "COVID-related," while patients suffering from heart disease, pneumonia, or bacterial infections were misdiagnosed, isolated, and subjected to lethal protocols like remdesivir and ventilator overuse.
Hospitals as killing fields: how protocols and mandates worsened the crisis
Under the CDC’s guidance, hospitals became death traps. Patients testing positive—regardless of symptoms—were funneled into dangerous treatment pathways:
• Remdesivir, a failed Ebola drug with a 53% mortality rate in trials, was pushed as the standard of care.
• Ventilators were overused, destroying lung tissue in patients who needed oxygen support, not mechanical intubation.
• Early treatments like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, C, zinc, and a plethora of antivirals and anti-inflammatory medicines were censored, despite overwhelming clinical success abroad.
The result? Countless patients died not from COVID-19, but from medical malpractice. Autopsies later revealed that many "COVID deaths" were actually due to blood clots, organ failure from remdesivir, or ventilator-induced lung damage. This carnage was used to justify a failed vaccine program that perpetuated the medical atrocities.
The great admission: CDC ends the money flow to a phantom pandemic
Now, with emergency funding drying up, the CDC has effectively admitted the truth: the pandemic was a financial scheme. Without billions in taxpayer dollars propping up testing labs, the illusion collapses.
• No more inflated case counts from fraudulent PCR cycles.
• No more money for vaccine propaganda.
• No more hospital kickbacks for COVID diagnoses.
• No more fear porn to justify endless boosters.
The CDC’s funding cut is a small victory in a much larger war against medical tyranny. But the damage has already been done. Millions were misdiagnosed, mistreated, or killed by iatrogenic hospital protocols. Natural immunity was ignored while ineffective, dangerous vaccines were pushed on the public. The media, tech giants, and government agencies colluded to silence dissent, turning science into dogma and medicine into a profit-driven racket.
Now, as the curtain falls on this grotesque charade, one must ask: Will there ever be accountability? Or will the architects of this disaster — the CDC, the WHO, and the pharmaceutical cartels — simply move on to the next "crisis," leaving behind a trail of broken lives and a betrayed public?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The question remains: Will those responsible for this global catastrophe ever be held accountable? Or will history repeat itself in the next pandemic?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A history of deception
The JFK files also shed light on the CIA’s role in covering up these programs. The agency has a long history of using public health initiatives as cover for covert operations. For example, the CIA ran fake vaccine clinics in Pakistan and used HIV clinics in Latin America to conduct espionage.
During the COVID-19 scamdemic, the CIA and military-funded organizations worked to suppress any discussion of the virus’s origins. “It was Grafica who got $7 million in military PSYOP funding,” Benz revealed. “They were literally incubated in the Minerva Initiative, which, thank God, Trump has now shut down.”
The release of these documents is just the tip of the iceberg. The JFK files reference numerous annexes and cited documents that have yet to be declassified. “I want to know what’s in that paper,” Benz said, referring to a document that outlines methods for producing crop failures using biological agents.
As more information comes to light, the public must demand accountability from the agencies responsible for these programs. The Pentagon’s bioweapons playbook has caused untold suffering, from the spread of Lyme disease to the devastation of the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the words of Benz, “It’s the same playbook, bro. It’s like 60 years, the same playbook. It’s unbelievable.”
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Dr. HJ Roberts’ investigation into aspartame’s safety sparks debate
Since its introduction in 1981, aspartame – the artificial sweetener marketed as NutraSweet – has become a ubiquitous ingredient in thousands of products, from diet sodas to sugar-free desserts. Touted as a calorie-free alternative to sugar, it has been embraced by millions seeking to manage weight or control blood sugar.
But is it truly safe? That’'s the question Dr. HJ Roberts, a seasoned internist and researcher, tackles in his provocative book, "Aspartame (NutraSweet): Is it Safe?" Through meticulous research and compelling patient stories, Roberts challenges the prevailing narrative, arguing that aspartame may be linked to a host of troubling health issues, from seizures and headaches to memory loss and depression.
Dr. Roberts' journey into the aspartame debate began with a single patient: a 16-year-old girl named Tammy, who suffered from recurrent seizures unresponsive to conventional treatments. Roberts noticed a pattern: Tammy's seizures coincided with her consumption of aspartame-sweetened products. When she avoihealth ded aspartame, the seizures stopped. When she unknowingly consumed it again, they returned. This observation sparked Roberts' curiosity and led him to investigate further. What he discovered was a disturbing pattern among his patients, many of whom reported symptoms that improved when aspartame was eliminated from their diets and recurred when it was reintroduced.
To better understand the scope of the issue, Roberts surveyed over 1,000 individuals who believed they were experiencing aspartame-related symptoms. The results were striking. Sixty-one percent of respondents reported consuming two 12-ounce cans of aspartame-sweetened soft drinks daily, while 43 percent used three packets of aspartame tabletop sweetener. The symptoms they described were wide-ranging and alarming, including severe headaches, dizziness, memory loss, vision problems and even seizures. These findings led Roberts to question the safety of aspartame and the regulatory processes that approved its widespread use.
Roberts' book delves into the science behind aspartame, breaking down its components – phenylalanine, aspartic acid and methanol – and explaining how they interact with the body. He argues that the rapid breakdown and absorption of aspartame can disrupt neurotransmitter balance in the brain, potentially triggering neurological symptoms such as seizures and headaches. He also explores the possibility that aspartame may interfere with insulin regulation and glucose metabolism, contributing to metabolic disorders like diabetes and hypoglycemia.
Despite these concerns, aspartame remains widely used and endorsed by major health organizations, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Roberts, however, contends that the approval process for aspartame was flawed. He points to studies conducted by the FDA's scientists that raised concerns about aspartame's safety, including research linking it to brain tumors in animals. Yet, these warnings were dismissed, and aspartame was approved for use in soft drinks in 1983. Roberts also criticizes the reliance on double-blind studies, arguing that they often fail to replicate real-world conditions.
The debate over aspartame's safety is far from settled. While the scientific community remains divided, the stories of aspartame reactors and the concerns raised by Roberts demand attention. As he writes, "The widespread use of aspartame in food and beverages, often without clear labeling, puts vulnerable populations at unnecessary risk." For those who experience adverse effects, the solution may be simple: avoid aspartame. But for the broader population, the question of whether aspartame is a harmless sweetener or a potential health hazard remains unanswered.
Watch the video below to learn more about the risks of aspartame.
https://www.brighteon.com/bf97f846-7d47-4544-8c8f-08b79987e178
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
The flu vaccine paradox: Are we making things worse?
In a world where annual flu shots are marketed as a cornerstone of public health, Dr. Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD, a renowned expert in vaccine development, has dropped a bombshell: much of what we’ve been told about influenza vaccination is, in his words, “propaganda.” In a recent essay titled "Deconstructing HHS: Influenza Vaccine Propaganda," Malone challenges long-standing assumptions about flu vaccines, revealing startling data and historical context that demand a closer look.
The elderly paradox: More vaccines, more deaths?
One of the most shocking revelations in Malone’s essay is the claim that increasing annual influenza vaccination among the elderly is associated with higher influenza-related death rates. This counterintuitive finding is supported by a peer-reviewed study published in Archives of Internal Medicine in 2005. The study analyzed data from 1968 to 2001 and found that as flu vaccine coverage among the elderly rose from 15-20% to 65%, influenza-related mortality rates did not decline as expected.
“Natural immunity acquired by influenza infection works to prevent future ‘influenza-related’ deaths in the elderly,” Malone explains. “Vaccination to a specific influenza A virus strain (H1N1) does not improve natural immunity to that strain and, on average, increased influenza vaccine uptake increases all-cause ‘influenza-related’ death in the elderly.”
This raises serious questions about the efficacy of annual flu shots, particularly for older adults. Malone points out that “influenza-like illness” is often misattributed to the flu virus itself, when in fact, many other pathogens—such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), mycoplasma and coronaviruses—can cause similar symptoms. This misclassification inflates flu-related death statistics, much like the controversial “deaths with COVID” versus “deaths from COVID” debate.
Immune imprinting: Are flu shots backfiring?
Another critical issue Malone highlights is the phenomenon of “immune imprinting,” formerly known as “original antigenic sin.” This concept, first described in the 1960s, refers to how the immune system’s first exposure to a virus shapes its response to future infections.
“If you get ‘boosted’ every year with a suboptimal influenza vaccine, it sets your immune system up to be focused on last year’s virus rather than being better able to respond to tomorrow’s strain,” Malone writes. This immune bias can make individuals more susceptible to newly evolved flu strains, undermining the very purpose of vaccination.
This leads to a broader concern: the use of “leaky vaccines,” which are only partially effective at preventing infection and transmission. Malone warns that widespread deployment of such vaccines accelerates the evolution of vaccine-resistant viruses. “You cannot ‘vaccinate’ your way out of an outbreak of influenza with an imperfect vaccine,” he asserts. “If you try, you will only make matters worse.”
The 1918 Spanish flu: A misleading narrative?
Malone also takes aim at the historical narrative surrounding the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, often cited as a justification for universal flu vaccination policies. He argues that most deaths during that pandemic were not caused by the influenza virus itself but by secondary bacterial pneumonia—a complication that could have been treated with antibiotics, had they been available at the time.
“If adequate doses of antibiotics had been available, the deaths would have been avoided,” Malone states. He suggests that instead of investing billions in new mRNA flu vaccines, the U.S. should prioritize domestic antibiotic research and manufacturing capacity.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Senate moves to ban Chinese researchers from U.S. national labs amid espionage fears
In a bold move to safeguard America’s most sensitive scientific research, Republican lawmakers are pushing to ban foreign researchers from adversarial nations – including China – from accessing U.S. national laboratories.
The proposed legislation, known as the Guarding American Technology from Exploitation (GATE) Act, aims to close what lawmakers describe as glaring security gaps that have allowed hostile regimes to exploit American innovation for their own military and technological gain. Introduced by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), the bill targets scientists from China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and Cuba.
Scientists from the five adversary nations would be barred from working in or accessing the Department of Energy's (DOE) 17 national laboratories. These labs are at the forefront of cutting-edge research in energy, nuclear deterrence, and advanced technology—areas critical to both U.S. national security and global competitiveness.
The urgency behind the bill stems from mounting evidence that foreign adversaries, particularly China, have systematically targeted American labs to steal intellectual property and recruit top scientists. According to Cotton’s office, nearly 8,000 of the 40,000 foreign scientists who accessed these labs in fiscal year 2023 were from China and Russia. This means one in five foreign researchers entering these facilities hailed from nations the U.S. considers its most dangerous adversaries.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been accused of using programs like the Thousand Talents Plan to lure scientists trained in the U.S. back to China, where their expertise is used to advance Beijing’s military ambitions. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), a co-sponsor of the bill, warned that former DOE researchers have already helped China develop hypersonic missiles, deep earth-penetrating warheads and advanced submarines – weapons designed to counter U.S. military superiority.
How U.S. labs became a target for exploitation
While the GATE Act would prohibit non-citizen researchers from adversarial nations from working at DOE labs, it includes a waiver process. The energy secretary could grant exceptions for academic visitors if their participation is deemed to provide a clear benefit to U.S. national security. However, critics argue that such waivers could still leave the door open to exploitation.
Cotton has emphasized the lack of reciprocity in U.S.-China scientific collaboration. While American researchers are barred from accessing China's most sensitive facilities, Chinese scientists have enjoyed relatively unrestricted access to U.S. labs. This imbalance, he argues, has allowed Beijing to exploit American openness while shielding its own research from foreign scrutiny.
The concerns are not unfounded. A 2021 report by Strider Technologies revealed that at least 162 former scientists from Los Alamos National Laboratory – home to the development of the world's first atomic bomb – were recruited by Beijing to work on its military programs over the past three decades. In 2020, a former Los Alamos scientist was sentenced to five years of probation for lying about his involvement in the Thousand Talents Program.
The GATE Act builds on existing restrictions included in the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, which bars citizens of China, Russia, Iran and North Korea from accessing certain national security research sites. The initial provision applies to the Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Sandia national laboratories.
However, the new bill seeks to expand these restrictions to all 17 DOE labs – a move supported by former DOE Undersecretary Paul Dabbar. The Energy Department official under the first Trump administration cited "a whole generation of successful efforts by communist China in stealing stuff" to justify the expansion.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Treasury secretary declares war on “politically driven” financial regulation: Is this the end of ESG overreach?
In a bold move that has reignited the debate over the role of government in financial regulation, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has shifted the focus of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) away from what he calls "politically driven" oversight and toward promoting economic growth. While conservatives hail this as a long-overdue correction to years of bureaucratic overreach, critics warn that the administration’s deregulatory agenda risks undermining financial stability and enabling government waste.
A new vision for financial oversight
At a recent FSOC meeting held in executive session, Bessent outlined his vision for a streamlined regulatory framework that prioritizes material financial risks over what he describes as excessive focus on social and environmental concerns. “We need to unshackle the regulated banking system and refocus financial oversight on material risks rather than politically-driven agendas,” Bessent declared, echoing themes from his earlier speeches and interviews.
This shift marks a stark departure from the previous administration’s emphasis on reputational risk and environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors. Critics of the prior approach argue that it stifled innovation and burdened businesses with unnecessary compliance costs. Bessent’s agenda, however, seeks to empower the private sector by reducing regulatory hurdles and enhancing bank lending to small and regional banks.
“We need our financial regulators singing in unison from the same song sheet,” Bessent said during a speech at the Economic Club of New York. “To be clear, this does not mean consolidation of agencies, but coordination via Treasury, such that our regulators work in parallel with each other and industry.”
The battle over ESG and DEI
The Trump administration’s push to refocus financial oversight has drawn sharp criticism from Democrats and progressive groups, who argue that the move undermines efforts to address climate change, social justice and corporate accountability. For years, Democrats have sought to use financial regulation to advance ESG and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) goals, often through non-legislative channels.
Bessent’s approach, however, signals a clear rejection of these priorities. “The administration’s efforts to bolster Treasury market resilience and enhance coordination on cybersecurity risks reflect its focus on safeguarding the core financial infrastructure without stifling economic activity,” one observer noted.
This ideological clash is not new. The debate over the role of government in regulating private enterprise dates back to the New Deal era, when Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration expanded federal oversight to stabilize the economy after the Great Depression. In recent decades, however, conservatives have argued that such oversight has become overly burdensome, stifling innovation and economic growth.
Streamlining government: A double-edged sword?
The administration’s deregulatory agenda extends beyond financial oversight. The Small Business Administration (SBA), for example, recently announced plans to reduce its workforce by 43%, cutting approximately 2,700 positions. SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler framed the move as a necessary step to refocus the agency on its “core missions” of small business promotion, loan guarantees and disaster assistance.
“Just like the small business owners we support, we must do more with less,” Loeffler said in a press release. “The SBA was created to be a launchpad for America’s small businesses by offering access to capital, which in turn drives job creation, innovation and a thriving Main Street. But in the last four years, the agency has veered off track—doubling in size and turning into a sprawling leviathan plagued by mission creep, financial mismanagement and waste.”
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Rational epidemiologists were censored and there was NO scientific precedent for lockdowns: SARS-CoV-2 had already circulated globally for months
In March 2025, five years after the world was plunged into unprecedented lockdowns and authoritarian measures, the legacy of COVID-19 policies, coverups, and censorship continues to haunt humanity. What began as a response to a novel coronavirus quickly devolved into a global experiment in bioterror, with governments weaponizing fear to justify draconian measures that violated civil liberties and silenced scientific dissent. At the heart of this crisis lies a chilling truth: the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that sparked the pandemic, remain shrouded in secrecy, while the policies enacted to combat it were based on flawed science and political agendas rather than evidence.
The silencing of science: death threats and censorship
Dr. John W. Ayers, one of the most cited and influential epidemiologists of our time, conducted a seroprevalence study in early 2020 that revealed a startling truth: COVID-19 had already infected far more people than previously thought, rendering the case fatality rates wildly exaggerated. Instead of being celebrated for his groundbreaking work, Ayers faced death threats and professional ostracization. "I was threatened with being fired for writing in 2022 that kids shouldn't be forced to mask and should be allowed to go to school," Ayers revealed.
This pattern of intimidation extended to other scientists, including Dr. John Ioannidis, a Stanford University professor and one of the world's most cited epidemiologists. Ioannidis, who questioned the proportionality and effectiveness of lockdowns, faced relentless attacks. "Death threats were very commonplace," Ioannidis stated. "Both myself and every single member of my family were attacked in ways that I could never have imagined."
The toxic environment forced many credible scientists to self-silence, leaving the field of epidemiology to be dominated by individuals with little to no expertise. "Most of the people who dictated the narratives had no clue about epidemiology," Ioannidis lamented.
The failure of non-pharmaceutical interventions
The so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs)—lockdowns, mask mandates, and school closures—were implemented without scientific consensus and against the recommendations of existing pandemic plans. These measures, which represented a significant encroachment on civil liberties, failed to achieve their stated goals.
Ioannidis, in a March 2025 interview, reflected on the futility of these policies. "We not only shed light on the questions of how dangerous SARS-CoV-2 really was or how it could happen that the social debate space was so poisoned," he said. "We also talk about the effectiveness of mod-RNA injections and the significance of leaked RKI-minutes, which revealed the strong influence of politics on science."
The leaked minutes from Germany's Robert Koch Institute (RKI) exposed the extent to which political agendas influenced public health decisions, further eroding trust in institutions.
The lab leak and the politicization of science
The origins of SARS-CoV-2 remain a contentious issue, with growing evidence pointing to a lab leak in Wuhan, China. Ioannidis expressed concern over the lack of transparency in research. "Regarding the origin of the virus, I have always believed that we need transparency in research," he said. "In the absence of such, the debate moves out of science and becomes an issue for the secret services, which is a pity for science."
The politicization of the lab leak hypothesis has been used to justify the draconian measures enacted during the pandemic. "I do worry that a narrative 'secret services say it was a lab leak' can be linked easily with a narrative 'so, it must have been a horrible virus and therefore all the horrible measures we took were justified,'" Ioannidis warned.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Three child deaths within 24 hours after routine vaccines: Japanese study calls for urgent reevaluation of vaccine safety
In a groundbreaking study published in Discover Medicine, Japanese researchers have sounded the alarm over the safety of routine childhood vaccines, citing the deaths of three children within 24 hours of immunization. The study, led by Dr. Kenji Yamamoto, a cardiothoracic surgeon at Okamura Memorial Hospital, calls for a critical reevaluation of the risks and benefits of approved vaccines and the childhood vaccination schedule.
The findings come amid growing concerns about post-vaccination adverse events, particularly following the widespread rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The study also highlights an alarming increase in excess deaths in Japan since the introduction of these vaccines, raising urgent questions about their long-term safety.
Three tragic cases: A call for transparency
The study details three cases of child deaths reported by Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW):
1. A healthy 2-month-old boy who became ill 30 minutes after receiving the Hib, rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccines. He died 59 minutes after vaccination.
2. A 6-month-old girl with mild cold symptoms who was found dead in her bedroom one day after receiving the hepatitis B, Hib, pneumococcal and four-in-one (pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, polio) vaccines.
3. A 3-year-old boy with a history of asthmatic bronchitis and febrile convulsions who appeared lethargic and developed a fever 8 hours after receiving the Japanese encephalitis vaccine. He experienced cardiopulmonary arrest 10 hours post-vaccination.
Despite detailed investigations, including autopsies, experts were unable to establish a causal link between the vaccines and the deaths. The cases were classified as “evaluation not possible,” a conclusion that has drawn criticism for its lack of transparency.
“The time following vaccination is one of the foundations for determining causation when adverse events occur,” said Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense. “These cases raise serious concerns about the safety of the current vaccination schedule.”
A growing body of evidence
The study also references a 2023 peer-reviewed paper published in Cureus, which found a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses infants receive and infant mortality rates. This finding echoes a 2011 study that first identified this troubling trend.
In Japan, children receive vaccines for nearly 14 different diseases by adulthood, with many doses administered simultaneously. The study warns that the simultaneous administration of newly developed vaccines, whose safety profiles may not be fully understood, could obscure causal links to adverse events.
“The aggressive promotion of vaccines through biased messaging has created an atmosphere where questioning vaccination is considered taboo,” the authors wrote. “This conformity may explain the lack of progress in critically reviewing vaccination practices.”
Excess deaths and mRNA vaccines: A troubling link
The study also addresses the rise in adverse events and excess deaths following the introduction of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Japan has recorded over 600,000 excess deaths since the start of the vaccination campaign, a figure that cannot be explained solely by COVID-19-related deaths or an aging population.
“There has been a rise in cases of shingles, monkeypox, syphilis, severe streptococcal infections, measles, sepsis and post-operative infections in countries administering multiple vaccine doses,” the study noted. These adverse events often occur within the first two weeks after vaccination, coinciding with immunosuppression and reduced lymphocyte counts.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Iowa takes on Big Pharma: Bill challenges vaccine makers’ liability shield
In a bold move that could reshape the landscape of vaccine accountability, an Iowa House of Representatives subcommittee advanced a bill that would bar the sale and administration of vaccines in the state unless manufacturers waive some of the liability protections granted under federal law. House File 712, introduced by State Rep. Charley Thomson, aims to hold vaccine manufacturers accountable for injuries caused by design defects, a move that has sparked heated debate about corporate responsibility, public health, and individual rights.
The push for accountability
The bill targets a key issue: the liability shield that vaccine manufacturers have enjoyed since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). This federal law established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), a “no-fault” system designed to compensate individuals injured by vaccines while protecting manufacturers from costly lawsuits. However, critics argue that the system has failed to adequately serve the public, with only 11,671 out of 24,602 adjudicated claims resulting in compensation over the past three decades.
Rep. Thomson, a Republican from Charles City, explained his motivation for introducing the bill: “We don’t allow it for toaster ovens, for paint, for any one of 10 million different items that people buy in the United States, and we shouldn’t allow it for vaccines. If anything, we should maybe be a little more strict with things that are very complicated and are being put into people’s bodies and represented as safe and not poisonous.”
The bill specifically addresses design defect claims, which occur when a vaccine’s inherent design—rather than a flaw in its manufacturing or administration—makes it dangerous. Under current law, vaccine manufacturers are immune from such claims due to a 2011 Supreme Court decision, Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, which reinterpreted the NCVIA to grant blanket liability protection to pharmaceutical companies.
A broken system?
The Bruesewitz case has been a flashpoint for critics of the vaccine injury compensation system. The lawsuit was brought by the parents of Hannah Bruesewitz, who suffered seizures and developmental issues after receiving the DPT vaccine in 1992. After being denied compensation by the VICP, the family sued Wyeth (now Pfizer) in state court, only to have the Supreme Court rule in favor of the manufacturer.
In a scathing dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, accused the majority of misinterpreting the NCVIA and prioritizing corporate interests over public health. Sotomayor wrote, “Manufacturers, given the lack of robust competition in the vaccine market, will often have little or no incentive to improve the designs of vaccines that are already generating significant profit margins.”
Kim Mack Rosenberg, General Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, echoed this sentiment, calling the Bruesewitz decision “devastating” for vaccine-injured individuals and their families. “Post-Bruesewitz, parties have very limited judicial remedies against the manufacturers,” she said. “This bill is important from an educational perspective as well. At a minimum, it focuses attention on the extraordinary liability protection enjoyed by vaccine manufacturers.”
Public sentiment shifts
The Iowa bill reflects a growing public demand for accountability in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lindsay Mahar of Informed Choice Iowa noted that public support for vaccine mandates and liability protections has shifted significantly in recent years. “Social media and the internet have just really helped educate people, get other sources of information besides just what they’re told in the doctor’s office,” she said.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Japanese plant yields compounds with potent anti-HIV activity, offering hope for new treatments
In a groundbreaking discovery, researchers have identified potent anti-HIV compounds in Daphne pseudomezereum, a plant native to Japan, China, and Korea. Commonly known as Onishibari, this deciduous shrub has long been used in traditional medicine for its anti-inflammatory properties. Now, scientists from Toho University and Duke University Medical Center have uncovered its potential to combat HIV, a virus that has plagued humanity for decades. Published in the journal Phytochemistry, the study highlights the isolation of 10 daphnane diterpenoids, three of which exhibit remarkable anti-HIV activity with minimal toxicity. This discovery could pave the way for novel treatments, offering hope to millions worldwide.
Key findings
• Researchers isolated 10 daphnane diterpenoids from the fruits of Daphne pseudomezereum, including three previously undescribed compounds.
• Three compounds demonstrated potent anti-HIV activity, with EC50 values as low as 0.78 nM, indicating high efficacy.
• The compounds showed low cytotoxicity, with IC50 values exceeding 5 ?M, suggesting they are safe for further development.
• This discovery builds on the plant’s traditional use in treating chronic skin diseases and rheumatism, expanding its medicinal potential.
A plant with a rich medicinal history
Daphne pseudomezereum belongs to the Thymelaeaceae family, a group of plants known for their diverse biological activities, including anticancer, anti-HIV, and analgesic effects. Historically, the bark of this plant has been used in Japanese papermaking and traditional medicine, particularly for its anti-inflammatory properties. However, its fruits, which are toxic if consumed, had not been extensively studied until now.
The research team, led by Professor Wei Li of Toho University, focused on the plant’s fruits, isolating compounds that could inhibit HIV replication. “This is the first time daphnane diterpenoids have been isolated from D. pseudomezereum,” said Dr. Wei Li. “The compounds we identified not only show strong anti-HIV activity but also have low toxicity, making them promising candidates for drug development.”
The science behind the discovery
The study involved extracting compounds from the plant’s fruits and testing their efficacy against HIV. Among the 10 isolated compounds, three—dubbed onishibarins A, B, and C—stood out for their potent antiviral activity. These compounds target HIV replication at the cellular level, offering a potential mechanism for future therapies.
“The structural complexity of these diterpenoids is fascinating,” said Dr. Takashi Kikuchi, a co-author of the study. “Their unique configuration allows them to interact with HIV in a way that inhibits its replication without harming healthy cells.”
The findings are particularly significant given the ongoing global HIV crisis. According to the World Health Organization, approximately 39 million people were living with HIV in 2022, with 1.3 million new infections reported that year. While antiretroviral therapies have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable condition, drug resistance and side effects remain significant challenges.
The future of plant-based medicine
This discovery underscores the untapped potential of plant-based medicine in addressing modern health crises. For centuries, traditional healers have relied on plants like D. pseudomezereum to treat a variety of ailments. Now, modern science is validating their wisdom, uncovering compounds that could revolutionize medicine.
“Nature has always been the best chemist,” said Dr. Li. “By studying plants like D. pseudomezereum, we can discover compounds that are not only effective but also safe and sustainable.”
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻