19571
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
Fake Ozempic and weight loss drugs with rat poison and deadly toxins circulating, posing life-threatening risks to consumers
U.S. and UK health authorities have uncovered hundreds of counterfeit weight loss injections containing hazardous substances like rat poison, cement, mercury, and arsenic. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a warning this week, revealing that these fake medications, often marketed as popular weight-loss drugs like Ozempic, have already sent unsuspecting users into life-threatening comas. While the mainstream media continues to focus on the so-called "obesity epidemic," the failure of government regulators to curb the underground market of counterfeit drugs has left consumers vulnerable to potentially deadly consequences.
The MHRA has admitted that these counterfeit drugs are now so widespread they could infiltrate legitimate pharmacies, raising alarms about the safety of the entire pharmaceutical supply chain. Meanwhile, the FBI has issued a similar warning about compounded weight loss drugs that claim to contain semaglutide, cautioning that they have found "compounded mixtures of unknown drugs that do not contain semaglutide, drugs with high levels of impurities, and unsafe or unapproved drugs."
A toxic cocktail
The counterfeit injections, often sold online or through unregulated channels, are designed to mimic legitimate weight-loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy. However, laboratory tests have revealed that many contain toxic substances such as rat poison, cement, mercury, and arsenic. These dangerous additives can lead to catastrophic health outcomes, including kidney failure, neurological damage, and even death. It can be difficult to spot the fakes, although some have subtle differences in their color and labeling compared to the real versions.
The risks of legitimate weight-loss drugs
Even the legitimate versions of these weight-loss drugs come with significant risks. Ozempic, for example, is derived from the venom of the Gila monster, a venomous lizard native to the southwestern United States. While it has been approved for use in managing type 2 diabetes and obesity, it has been linked to severe side effects, including gastroparesis (a condition that slows or stops stomach emptying), pancreatitis, and even blindness in rare cases.
A failing system of regulation
The MHRA’s admission that counterfeit drugs could infiltrate legitimate pharmacies underscores a broader failure in regulatory oversight. Despite repeated warnings about the dangers of unregulated online pharmacies, the agency has struggled to keep pace with the rapidly growing market for counterfeit medications.
Experts argue that the problem is exacerbated by the high demand for weight-loss drugs, driven by societal pressures and aggressive marketing. Criminals are rushing to exploit the growing demand for the drug, and much of the public is unaware of the extent of the issue. The FBI urges consumers to be wary of any drugs that have "suspiciously low prices" and those that are sold by unlicensed medical professionals. They add that patients should talk to medical providers before taking any type of weight loss drug.
A wake-up call for consumers and regulators
The discovery of counterfeit weight-loss injections containing deadly substances is a reminder of the dangers lurking in the unregulated pharmaceutical market. Although the allure of quick fixes for weight loss may be tempting, the risks — both from counterfeit and legitimate drugs — are too great to ignore. As authorities scramble to address the crisis, consumers are urged to exercise extreme caution when purchasing medications online.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Medical review of Texas “measles” death finds MEDICAL MALPRACTICE as the cause of death
A preventable death: How medical errors and vaccine dogma led to tragedy
In a shocking revelation, a Texas child’s death, widely reported as the first pediatric measles fatality in decades, has been exposed as a tragic case of medical malpractice, covered up by a litany of propaganda. According to hospital records obtained by Children’s Health Defense, the child did not die from measles but from Mycoplasma pneumonia that was improperly treated by medical staff. The case has sparked outrage among medical professionals and raised disturbing questions about whether the death was exploited to advance vaccine industry narratives or if it was the result of gross incompetence.
The child, described as otherwise healthy, was admitted to the hospital with measles, which was reportedly resolving on its own. However, she developed a secondary bacterial pneumonia infection, a common complication of most viral illnesses. According to Dr. Pierre Kory, a critical care specialist who reviewed the case, the hospital failed to administer the appropriate antibiotics in a timely manner, leading to her rapid decline and eventual death.
“This is like medicine 101,” said Dr. Kory in an exclusive interview. “When you admit someone to the hospital for pneumonia, you treat empirically with antibiotics that cover the most common organisms. This child was given an insufficient antibiotic, and when the error was finally recognized, it took 10 hours to administer the correct treatment. By then, she was already on a ventilator, and less than 24 hours later, she died catastrophically.”
Dr. Kory emphasized that the child’s death was not due to measles but to a “grievous” medical error. “She died because she got an inappropriate antibiotic. This was an otherwise healthy child who could have been saved with proper care,” he added.
This error led to a string of further errors, as doctors denied the mother access to her child, and denied the mother the ability to give her child water. Afterward, the child was sedated and ventilated, which caused further harm, as proper treatments like budesonide and vitamin A could have opened up the child’s airways and given her immune system what it needed to conquer the pneumonia.
A pattern of exploitation: Child's wrongful death was used to push an agenda
The case has ignited a firestorm of controversy, with some questioning whether the hospital’s handling of the situation was influenced by ulterior motives. The death was quickly seized upon by the media and public health officials as evidence of the dangers of measles and the importance of vaccination. However, the revelation that the child died from medical malpractice, not measles, has cast doubt on the narrative.
“This story was used to attack Secretary Kennedy as soon as he took office and to scuttle the nomination of David Weldon to head the CDC,” said a source familiar with the case. “Again, there was no measles death. So now the question is, were these errors that took the girl’s life, or did they let her die because they needed to report a measles death?”
The vaccine industry has long used rare cases of measles complications to justify aggressive vaccination campaigns. This case appears to have been manipulated to create the illusion of a measles-related fatality, despite evidence to the contrary.
A call for accountability: investigations and lawsuits needed asap
The tragedy has prompted calls for investigations and potential lawsuits against the hospital. Dr. Ben Edwards, who has been treating the Mennonite community affected by the outbreak, described the death as a “tragic mistake” and emphasized the need for accountability.
“This was, at best, a medical error. At worst, it was a deliberate act to create a narrative,” said Dr. Edwards. “Either way, the hospital failed this child and her family.”
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
During COVID jab rollout, pharmaceutical giants committed 53 violations against the UK Code of Practice
In a shocking revelation, Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca have been found guilty of breaching the UK pharmaceutical code of practice a staggering 53 times over the past four years, raising serious questions about the integrity of the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory systems meant to hold it accountable. These violations, which include misleading the public about vaccine safety, improper marketing to children, and even allegations of bribery, highlight a systemic failure to uphold ethical standards during the covid-19 scandal. Despite these egregious offenses, no fines or meaningful penalties have been imposed, leaving many to wonder: Who is truly protecting the public?
The UK-based campaign group UsForThem recently released a video summarizing the complaints filed with the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the self-regulatory body overseeing the pharmaceutical industry. The video, posted on March 18, 2025, exposes a litany of offenses committed by these companies, including:
• Misleading claims about vaccine safety and efficacy.
• Improper marketing of vaccines to children.
• Allegations of bribery and unethical practices.
• Bringing discredit to the pharmaceutical industry.
The video concludes with a damning indictment: “Despite a track record of serious and persistent offending, no fines or other penalties have been imposed by the regulator. The UK’s pharma regulatory system is broken.”
A broken system: self-regulation fails the public
The PMCPA, which administers the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) Code of Practice, is tasked with ensuring that pharmaceutical companies operate ethically and responsibly. However, its inability to impose fines or meaningful sanctions has rendered it largely toothless. Companies found in breach of the code are required to pay administrative charges and provide written undertakings, but these measures have done little to deter repeated violations.
The ABPI Code of Practice explicitly prohibits the promotion of prescription-only medicines, including vaccines, to the public. Yet, Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca have repeatedly flouted this rule, using social media and other platforms to market their products directly to consumers. One particularly egregious case involved a Pfizer employee retweeting a misleading post about the company’s covid-19 vaccine, which remained publicly visible for over two years before being deleted.
The human cost: pervasive unethical practices and destroyed public trust
The violations committed by these pharmaceutical giants are not merely bureaucratic missteps; they represent a profound betrayal of public trust. By misleading the public about the safety and efficacy of their vaccines, these companies have put countless lives at risk. The improper marketing of vaccines to children, a particularly vulnerable demographic, is especially alarming.
“The litany of serious and persistent offending includes misleading the public about the safety and efficacy of their vaccines, bringing discredit on the pharmaceutical industry, improper marketing of their products to children, and bribery,” UsForThem stated in their video.
Despite these grave offenses, the PMCPA has failed to take decisive action. The lack of accountability raises troubling questions about the influence of pharmaceutical companies over regulatory bodies. With four out of ten members of the Code of Practice Appeal Board representing pharmaceutical companies, it is little wonder that the industry continues to operate with impunity.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Texas health officials reject doctor’s plea to recommend budesonide and vitamin A – prioritizing vaccine propaganda over life-saving TREATMENTS
The vaccine industry’s stranglehold on medicine
In a shocking display of bureaucratic rigidity, Texas health officials have rejected a doctor’s plea to recommend budesonide as a treatment for measles, opting instead to promote the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine as the sole solution. Dr. Ben Edwards, a Texas physician who successfully treated measles patients with budesonide and vitamin A, sought to share his findings with local and regional clinics, hospitals, and doctor’s offices. However, his request was denied by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), which claimed that the state could only endorse the MMR vaccine for measles prevention.
This decision comes in the wake of a measles outbreak in West Texas, where a 6-year-old child tragically died from a rare case of pneumonia after being sedated and ventilated in the hospital awhile testing positive for measles. The child’s parents revealed to Children’s Health Defense (CHD) that their four other children recovered quickly from measles after receiving cod liver oil (a source of vitamin A) and budesonide. The child who died did not receive these treatments, and was sedated in the hospital, raising questions about whether her life could have been saved.
The refusal of Texas health officials to acknowledge efficacious treatments for measles is emblematic of a larger issue: the vaccine industry’s monopolistic control over public health policy. Despite evidence that budesonide can alleviate respiratory distress caused by measles, state medical boards and health authorities continue to suppress such information, ensuring that vaccines remain the only sanctioned approach to infectious disease.
Dr. Edwards recounted his conversation with Dr. Scott Milton, the DSHS Public Health Region 1 medical director, who stated that higher authorities would not “go for” promoting budesonide. This admission reveals a disturbing truth: medical boards are not guided by patient outcomes but by an ideological commitment to the vaccine industry.
The CDC’s webpage on measles offers no mention of treatments, only prevention through the MMR vaccine. However, the vaccine is not recommended for individuals already sick with a fever—a common symptom of measles. This leaves patients, particularly children, with no clear path to recovery.
Budesonide: a proven treatment suppressed
Budesonide, an inhaled corticosteroid traditionally used for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, has shown promise in treating respiratory inflammation caused by viral infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, frontline doctors and researchers, including those at Oxford University, found budesonide effective in mitigating respiratory distress.
Dr. Richard Bartlett, a West Texas emergency room physician with over 30 years of experience, has been a vocal advocate for budesonide. His website, Budesonide Works, highlights numerous studies demonstrating the steroid’s effectiveness. Bartlett and other doctors are now pushing for legislation to make nebulized budesonide and nebulizer machines available over-the-counter.
“I am aware of four children who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at the Covenant Children’s Hospital in Lubbock, Texas, and received nebulized budesonide,” Bartlett told The Defender. “All were discharged from the ICU straight to home after receiving budesonide treatments.”
Despite these successes, the medical establishment continues to ignore budesonide’s potential, prioritizing vaccine promotion over patient care.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Fauci and the PBS film crew probably thought that exchange exemplified the type of fools who refused to submit and be saved. Fauci justified covid mandates because average citizens “don’t have the ability” to determine what is best for them. But despite getting any and all boosters, Fauci was personally ravaged by covid at least three times. Fauci’s frauds began to be exposed, including his role in covertly bankrolling the reckless gain-of-function research that escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and killed seven million people worldwide. Instead of receiving a Nobel prize, Fauci was grateful that—on President Biden’s final day in office—he received a full presidential pardon for any and all of his crimes committed for the prior decade.
But what sort of savior scientist needs a presidential pardon, anyway?
A virus with a 99+ percent survival rate spawned a 100 percent presumption in favor of despotism. The government has no liability for the injections it mandates or the freedoms it destroys. The Covid-19 pandemic should teach Americans to never defer to “experts” who promise that granting them boundless power will keep everyone else safe. In the long run, people have more to fear from politicians than from viruses.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Five years later, we remember how politicians unleashed COVID tyranny
Five years ago, politicians and bureaucrats went berserk and pointlessly ravaged Americans’ freedom. The Covid-19 pandemic provided the pretext to destroy hundreds of thousands of businesses, padlock churches, close down schools, and effectively place hundreds of millions of Americans under house arrest. Despite all the forced sacrifices, most Americans contracted covid and more than a million were listed as dying from the virus.
“Pandemic Security Theater Is Self-Destructive, And Won’t Make Us Safer” was the headline of my first salvo against the pandemic hysteria, published on March 24, 2020 in the Daily Caller. I scoffed at President Trump’s proclamations about being a “wartime president at war with an invisible enemy.” Wartime presidents too easily pretend they’re on a mission from God to scourge all resistance. I warned: “The pandemic threatens to open authoritarian Pandora’s Boxes. Permitting governments to seize almost unlimited power based on shaky extrapolations of infection rates will doom our republic.”
From the start of the pandemic, the Mises Institute was in the forefront of condemning policies that eradicated prosperity in the name of public health. In a May 19, 2020 Mises piece headlined, “Hacksawing the Economy,” I noted, “The political response to COVID-19 is eerily similar to Civil War surgeons’ rationales for hacking off arms and legs…. As long as politicians claim that things would be worse if they had not amputated much of the economy, they can pirouette as saviors.”
Living in the Washington area, I had a front row seat for many of Covid-19’s biggest absurdities. After federal officials whipped up panic, “I Believe in Science” lawn signs popped up like mushrooms, soon accompanied by “Thank You, Dr. Fauci” placards. Those signs looked to me like frightful decorations of a Halloween that never ended.
Thoreau provided my lodestar for the pandemic: “A man sits as many risks as he runs.” I knew that isolation would make me too ornery for my own good. I had survived the flu plenty of times in prior decades and I didn’t reckon covid would deliver my coffin nails. I was a co-leader of a Meetup hiking group which continued hiking almost every weekend throughout the pandemic.
But politicians made such jaunts more difficult. In February 2021, President Biden decreed that face masks must be worn in national parks. Probably 95 percent of the National Park Service’s 800+ million acres is uncrowded 95 percent of the time. The only “evidence” to justify the mandate was that many Biden supporters were frightened or enraged whenever they saw anyone not wearing a mask. The new mandate quickly became an entitlement program for junior Stasi members.
I told attendees on my hikes that masks were optional but kvetching about other hikers wearing or not wearing masks was prohibited. Biden’s edict helped turn the C & O Canal Towpath—one of my favorite hiking venues—into a hotbed of self-righteousness. That Towpath was ten feet wide in most places, but it was the principle of the matter. I had numerous people furiously screaming at me because I wasn’t wearing a facemask as I strolled outside. If mask hecklers were especially persistent, I would shrug and ask them: “How is your therapy going?”
Washingtonians pride themselves on being smarter and better educated than most other Americans (okay, maybe excepting San Francisco and Boston). They instinctively knew that total servility was the only hope for surviving the pandemic, and maximizing hatred was the key to compliance. After Biden ordered 100 million adults to get injected with the covid vaccine, Biden derided the unvaxxed as aspiring mass murderers who only wanted “the freedom to kill you” with covid. (The Supreme Court struck down most of that illegal vax mandate.)
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
FULLY UNTESTED: Creator of the PCR test Mullis, who won Nobel Prize in Chemistry for it, on record saying PCR tests are NOT SUITABLE for viral detection
•PCR Test Misuse: The PCR test, invented by Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis, was never designed or intended for viral detection, including Covid-19. Critics argue it was misused as a primary Covid-19 screener, leading to widespread false positives and fueling fear.
•Vaccine Sales Strategy: The PCR test is described as a "sales set-up" for mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, which are labeled as dangerous and part of a larger conspiracy to push experimental treatments.
•Fearmongering Campaign: The widespread use of PCR tests is portrayed as a tool for fearmongering, creating a false sense of pandemic urgency and driving public compliance with vaccination and restrictive measures.
•Natural Immunity Advocacy: Critics of the Covid-19 response advocate for natural immunity through supplements like vitamin D, zinc, and ivermectin, while rejecting vaccines and PCR testing as part of a broader depopulation or control agenda.
What was used as the primary Covid-19 screener was never invented or purposed for viral detection and is NOT suitable for testing for Covid-19, admits the Nobel Prize winning creator. Let that sink in for a minute. The PCR test was known to be fraudulent in the biggest way for testing “positive” for China Flu, and it was and always will be just a “sales set up” for the deadliest ‘vaccines’ ever created – the mRNA DNA-fragment-contaminated Covid clot shots.
Kary Banks Mullis, an American biochemist, was recognized for the invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith for it, and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. However, PCR was never meant to test for viruses, and in fact, the PCR is a “sales set up” for the vaccine, just as the PSA is a sales set up for a prostate biopsy.
PCR tests were a sales set-up for the deadliest ‘vaccines’ on the planet – the mRNA gene-mutation stab jabs
Big Pharma used a famous “tool” to convince a few billion people that they had Covid, and everyone else to practice testing for it in order to fuel the biggest fearmongering campaign propaganda for a “pandemic” ever. It was all part of one huge conspiracy theory, with more legs than a spider. The PCR tests were the fake home kit that almost always came back “positive” if you had any kind of infection, including from bacteria, pathogens, parasites, or viruses, and these could originate from wearing a Covid face diaper all day (think mouth-breeding bacteria here).
The fully unvaccinated 60 million Americans knew this was a ploy right from the beginning. Plus, anyone who took the PCR test and mailed in the results were apt to be catalogued by the Democrat-Nazi government and sent to the FEMA death camps (hospitals and quarantine centers) to be put to rest (RIP-style) with more death stabs, Remdesivir, superbugs and ventilators.
So the fully unvaccinated stayed fully untested. Natural health advocates knew the best way to survive any plandemic was to build natural immunity to it, even if that meant catching it. The key was to ramp up your intake of vitamin D, zinc, oil of oregano (nature’s anti-viral and antibiotic herbal remedy), ivermectin, wormwood, and medicinal mushrooms to foster immune function.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
MEDICAL BOMBSHELL: FDA admits Covid mRNA ‘Vaccines’ CAUSE CANCER
The natural health advocacy world and truth media followers around the globe cannot believe their eyes, as the FDA has just made the explosive admission that the mRNA clot shots are indeed spiked with contaminants that have triggered the global surge in cancers. One hard look (clinical study) at Pfizer’s Covid stabs and the FDA had to admit to the world that they contain dangerous levels of excess DNA contamination, and that these fragments are driving cancer cases through the roof. It’s called Turbo Cancer and people are experiencing stage 4 and stage 5 cancer out of the blue, shortly after they receive the deadly mRNA Pfizer China Flu jab.
Inside the FDA laboratory where leading scientists have discovered that billions of humans who have been mRNA injected could get cancer from the clot shots
How many mass media outlets will publish this medical shocker? Natural health advocates warned about this long before the clot shots were even released under the Emergency Use Authorization act. They are experiments carried out on humans without any proof of safety or efficacy, not to mention long-term safety trials, as they were rushed through the process. From lab to turbo cancer.
Tests conducted at the FDA’s own White Oak Campus in Maryland found SHOCKING LEVELS of DNA contamination in the Covid clot shots. Surprise, surprise! The residual DNA levels greatly exceeded regulatory safety limits by up to 470 times. Let’s hear that again. The contamination of residual DNA fragments greatly exceeded regulatory safety limits by up to 470 times. Let that sink in for a minute.
Did Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci know this long ago? Of course they did. The Turbo Cancer jabs were always the main part of the PLANDEMIC experiment to rid the earth of a few billion people, just like Gates said at his TED talk years ago. It was never about preventing the contraction or spread of Covid, because Covid was no more deadly than the seasonal flu. They used propaganda that it was much worse to sell everyone on getting the Turbo Cancer injections. Get it?
Now the FDA is no longer run by psychopaths, like it was under the O’Biden Regime. The findings of this PEER-REVIEWED study were published in the Journal of High School Science, for any naysayers out there. Sure, this isn’t NIH or BMJ, but the mass media surely does NOT want the masses knowing about this, or they’ll all freak out and burn Fauci at the stake like a scarecrow.
The FDA researchers employed two primary analytical methods, both of which confirmed the presence of DNA contamination up to 470 times higher than permissible thresholds.
• NanoDrop Analysis – This technique uses UV spectrometry to measure the combined levels of DNA and RNA in the vaccine. While it provides an initial assessment, it tends to overestimate DNA concentrations due to interference from RNA, even when RNA-removal kits are utilized.
• Qubit Analysis – For more precise measurements, the researchers relied on the Qubit system, which quantifies double-stranded DNA using fluorometric dye.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. dismantles ideological HHS grants targeting “vaccine hesitancy” — signaling a new era of scientific integrity
In a bold move, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. terminates NIH-funded studies aimed at manipulating public opinion on vaccines, prioritizing safety and transparency over ideological agendas.
• RFK Jr. cancels 33 NIH grants focused on combating vaccine hesitancy, with nine others under review.
• The move targets studies promoting vaccine compliance rather than investigating vaccine safety.
• Critics argue the terminated grants were tools of propaganda, not science.
• The decision reflects a broader shift toward purging corruption and bias from public health research.
In a stunning rebuke of the World Health Organization and its financiers, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the newly appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), has axed dozens of National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants designed to stamp out so-called “vaccine hesitancy.” The move, which affects at least 33 research projects, signals a seismic shift in how the federal government approaches public health, prioritizing genuine scientific inquiry over ideological manipulation.
The terminated grants, many of which focused on “vaccine messaging strategies” and “barriers to vaccine uptake,” were widely criticized as thinly veiled propaganda campaigns. Instead of investigating the safety and efficacy of vaccines, these studies sought to engineer public compliance through psychological manipulation and censorship. For example, one grant aimed to “test vaccine messaging strategies for people with mental health disorders,” while another sought to combat “misinformation and disinformation” — code for silencing dissenting voices.
A history of corruption and coercion
The NIH’s approach to vaccine research has long been marred by corruption and conflicts of interest. Pharmaceutical companies, shielded by blanket legal immunity, have rigged studies, suppressed unfavorable data, and colluded with regulators to fast-track unsafe products to market. The COVID-19 vaccines, rushed through under Operation Warp Speed, are a glaring example. Despite mounting evidence of adverse effects, including myocarditis, blood clots, and autoimmune disorders, public health authorities have doubled down on their narrative, dismissing concerns as “misinformation” and punishing those who dare to question the official line.
RFK Jr.’s decision to terminate these grants is a direct challenge to this corrupt system. By defunding studies that prioritize compliance over safety, he is forcing the NIH to confront its own biases and restore public trust in science. As one source familiar with the situation told Science. org, the move is part of a broader effort to align NIH research with policies backed by President Donald Trump and RFK Jr. — policies that prioritize transparency, accountability, and individual freedom.
The silencing of dissent
Critics of the terminated grants argue that they were never about science in the first place. “Ceasing to support research on the uptake of safe and effective vaccines does not eliminate the underlying challenges related to low vaccine uptake — it exacerbates them,” said Denis Nash, an epidemiologist at the City University of New York whose grant is on the chopping block. But Nash’s claim rings hollow in light of the evidence.
The real goal of these studies was not to address vaccine hesitancy but to suppress it. By framing skepticism as a mental health issue or a product of “misinformation,” researchers sought to pathologize dissent and justify draconian measures like censorship, de-platforming, and financial sanctions. In Canada, for example, truckers who questioned vaccine mandates had their bank accounts frozen — a chilling reminder of how far governments are willing to go to enforce compliance.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
RFK Jr. exposes the hidden dangers of bird flu vaccines in poultry
In a bold and controversial statement, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has warned against vaccinating poultry amid the ongoing bird flu outbreak, arguing that such measures could pose significant risks to human health. Speaking to Fox News on March 11, 2025, Kennedy emphasized the dangers of using "leaky vaccines" that fail to provide complete immunity, potentially turning flocks into "mutation factories" for the virus.
This warning comes as the U.S. grapples with a bird flu crisis that has devastated egg-laying hen populations, driven egg prices to record highs and raised concerns about the virus's potential to jump to humans. Kennedy’s remarks have reignited debates about the role of vaccines, the importance of natural immunity and the unintended consequences of industrial farming practices.
The risks of "leaky vaccines"
Kennedy’s primary concern lies in the use of vaccines that do not provide sterilizing immunity—meaning they fail to completely block infection or transmission. "If you vaccinate with a leaky vaccine—in other words, a vaccine that does not provide sterilizing immunity, that does not absolutely protect against the disease—you turn those flocks into mutation factories," he explained.
This phenomenon, known as "vaccine-driven evolution," occurs when a virus mutates to evade partial immunity, potentially creating more virulent or transmissible strains. Kennedy warned that such mutations could make it "much more likely" for the virus to jump to other animals—or even humans.
Historical context supports this concern. For example, the use of leaky vaccines in the poultry industry has been linked to the emergence of more virulent strains of Marek’s disease, a highly contagious avian virus. Similarly, the overuse of antibiotics in livestock has contributed to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, underscoring the risks of industrial-scale interventions in animal health.
Kennedy’s stance is backed by officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), all of whom have advised against vaccinating birds. "It’s dangerous for human beings to vaccinate the birds," Kennedy reiterated.
The cost of culling: A crisis in the egg industry
The bird flu outbreak, which began in 2022, has led to the culling of 166 million chickens in the U.S., according to Kennedy. This drastic measure, intended to curb the spread of the virus, has had a devastating impact on the egg industry. Egg prices have skyrocketed, reaching an average of 4.95 per dozen in January 2025 — more than double the pre?outbreak price of 2.
Kennedy criticized the culling strategy, arguing that it is both economically damaging and scientifically misguided. "Most of our scientists are against the culling operation. They think that we should be testing therapeutics on those flocks. They should isolate. You should let the disease go with them and identify the birds that survive, which are the birds that probably have a genetic inclination for immunity," he said.
This approach, which prioritizes natural immunity over mass culling or vaccination, aligns with Kennedy’s broader advocacy for health freedom and natural solutions. It also raises important questions about the ethics and efficacy of current industrial farming practices, which often prioritize short-term profits over long-term sustainability and animal welfare.
A low risk to humans
While the bird flu outbreak has caused significant disruption to the poultry industry, the risk to human health remains low, according to the CDC. As of March 10, 2025, only 70 human cases of avian influenza have been reported in the U.S., with one death—a Louisiana resident over 65 with preexisting health conditions.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Christopher A. Shaw’s “Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars” sparks intense debate on vaccine safety and human freedom
In the contentious world of vaccine discourse, few books have ignited as much debate as Christopher A. Shaw's "Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars: Fighting for Human Freedom during the Great Reset." This provocative work delves into the heart of the vaccine debate, challenging the mainstream narrative on vaccine safety and exploring the broader implications for human freedom. Shaw, a neuroscientist whose research took an unexpected turn, presents a compelling case that has resonated with a growing segment of the population wary of the current vaccine paradigm.
Shaw's journey into the vaccine debate was not by design. Initially focused on studying Lou Gehrig's disease (ALS), his research took a dramatic shift when he and a graduate student began investigating a cluster of ALS cases linked to Gulf War Syndrome. This led them to the anthrax vaccine, which many soldiers had received. Despite facing resistance from the vaccine manufacturer, BioPort, Shaw's team meticulously analyzed the vaccine's ingredients. Their findings were alarming: aluminum adjuvants, particularly aluminum hydroxide, and squalene, a triterpene, appeared to have a significant negative impact on motor functions and reflexes in mice. Further examination revealed significant motor neuron degeneration in the aluminum-treated mice, setting Shaw on a path of questioning the safety of vaccines, especially those containing aluminum adjuvants.
Shaw's work directly challenges the prevailing view that vaccines are uniformly safe and effective. He criticizes the tendency to dismiss any questioning of vaccine safety as "anti-vaxxer" rhetoric, arguing that the term is often misused and misapplied to avoid addressing legitimate concerns. Shaw identifies three main groups in the vaccine debate: the "Pro-Vaccine" camp, the "True Anti-Vaccine" proponents and the Vaccine-Hesitant or Resistant.
The "Pro-Vaccine" group, comprising most medical professionals, views vaccines as one of the greatest medical advancements in history. They often dismiss any criticism of vaccines as unscientific and dangerous. On the other hand, the "True Anti-Vaccine" proponents reject vaccines entirely, often based on religious beliefs or a distrust of the medical establishment. The largest group, however, is the Vaccine-Hesitant or Resistant, who are not against vaccines per se but have concerns about their safety and efficacy. Shaw emphasizes that this group is often mischaracterized and demonized, arguing that their concerns deserve to be addressed with scientific rigor rather than condescension.
Shaw critically examines the scientific studies cited by both sides of the debate. He points out the flaws in studies that claim vaccines are safe, such as the lack of proper controls, conflicts of interest and the use of surrogate markers instead of actual disease challenges. He also criticizes the dismissal of studies that suggest potential vaccine harms, such as those linking aluminum adjuvants to neurodevelopmental disorders.
One of the central themes of Shaw's book is the role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. He argues that aluminum, a known neurotoxin, can have harmful effects on the central nervous system, particularly in developing children. Shaw cites studies suggesting that aluminum adjuvants can migrate to the brain and accumulate over time, potentially leading to neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. He criticizes the lack of long-term safety studies on aluminum adjuvants and the dismissal of concerns by regulatory bodies like the WHO and the CDC.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Injected allergies: How vaccines may be rewiring the immune systems and fueling the food allergy epidemic
In a world where food allergies have become a growing public health crisis, affecting millions of children and adults alike, one question remains largely unasked: Could vaccines be playing a role in this alarming trend? According to independent researcher Vinu Arumugham, the answer is a resounding yes. His groundbreaking work suggests that food proteins in vaccines may be driving the surge in food allergies—a phenomenon that has been understood for over a century but systematically ignored by the medical establishment.
The science behind sensitization
Arumugham, an electronics engineer turned vaccine safety advocate, began his journey into this controversial field after his son developed life-threatening food allergies and asthma. Frustrated by the lack of answers from medical professionals, he delved into the science himself. What he discovered was both startling and illuminating: when food proteins are injected into the body through vaccines, the immune system perceives them as foreign invaders, leading to sensitization and, ultimately, food allergies.
“We aren’t born allergic to food,” Arumugham explained in a recent interview. “Our bodies are designed to tolerate what we eat. But inject proteins instead of ingesting them, and the immune system sees them as invaders. That’s how you create food allergies.”
This process, known as immune sensitization, is not limited to proteins. It also applies to large protein-like molecules such as polysaccharides and polyethylene glycol (PEG), which are commonly found in vaccines. Arumugham’s research highlights a critical distinction: the human body has evolved to introduce food proteins through the mouth, not through injection. Eating foods leads to the development of oral tolerance, whereas injecting those proteins can defeat this tolerance and trigger an immune response.
A century-old discovery ignored
The connection between injected proteins and allergic reactions is not new. In fact, it dates back to the early 1900s, when French physiologist Charles Richet won the Nobel Prize for his discovery of anaphylaxis. Richet demonstrated that injecting small amounts of a substance could sensitize the body, leading to severe allergic reactions upon subsequent exposure. His work laid the foundation for understanding how vaccines could prime the immune system to react abnormally to benign substances.
Despite Richet’s groundbreaking findings, this knowledge has been largely ignored or dismissed by modern immunology. As Arumugham noted, “The first dose of the vaccine causes the development of allergies. Subsequent doses are booster shots for food allergy. With more shots being added to vaccine schedules, more people develop allergies, and more severe the allergies.”
The Japanese example
One of the most compelling pieces of evidence supporting Arumugham’s claims comes from Japan. In the late 1990s, researchers discovered that gelatin-containing vaccines were causing gelatin allergies in children. The Japanese government responded by removing gelatin from all vaccines in 2000, leading to a significant drop in gelatin allergies.
This case study underscores a critical point: food proteins in vaccines can and do cause allergic sensitization. Yet, regulators today are not even testing for protein contamination, and vaccine manufacturers are actively blocking access to vials to prevent scrutiny.
The role of adjuvants and vaccine schedules
Arumugham’s research also points to the role of adjuvants—substances like aluminum compounds that are added to vaccines to enhance the immune response. These adjuvants not only increase the immunogenicity of injected food proteins but also bias the immune system toward allergic reactions.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Mainstream media finally admits lockdowns were a disaster
Five years after the COVID-19 pandemic upended the world, the mainstream media is finally acknowledging what many conservatives and skeptics warned from the start: Lockdowns caused far more harm than good.
This belated admission comes after years of relentless mockery, censorship, and deplatforming of those who dared to question the wisdom of extreme measures like forced masking, school closures, and business shutdowns. Now, as studies reveal the devastating collateral damage of these policies, the media’s delayed reckoning raises serious questions about its role in silencing dissent and promoting fear-driven narratives.
The lockdown disaster: A costly experiment
In 2020, as the pandemic spread, governments worldwide implemented unprecedented lockdowns to curb the virus. These measures were justified by “experts” like Dr. Anthony Fauci and political leaders who warned of a “dark winter” if Americans didn’t comply. Yet, five years later, the data tells a different story. A groundbreaking study commissioned by Revolver News found that lockdowns were ten times more deadly than the virus itself, measured in terms of years of life lost due to economic devastation, mental health crises, and social isolation.
The study’s findings have since been echoed by a growing body of research. Schools closures led to catastrophic learning losses, with students still half a grade behind in math and reading. Mental health crises, particularly among young people, skyrocketed, with anxiety, depression, and suicide rates reaching alarming levels. Small businesses shuttered, livelihoods were destroyed, and social bonds frayed under the weight of prolonged isolation.
The media’s role in suppressing the truth
What’s most galling is how the media treated those who raised concerns about lockdowns. Conservatives, scientists, and everyday citizens who questioned the efficacy of these measures were labeled “conspiracy theorists,” censored on social media, and even deplatformed. Figures like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration opposing lockdowns, faced vicious backlash and death threats. Facebook and Twitter silenced dissenting voices, while public health officials like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins dismissed alternative viewpoints as dangerous.
Now, the same media outlets that once championed lockdowns are cautiously admitting their failures. The Boston Globe recently published a piece questioning whether the trade-offs of lockdowns were worth it, citing studies that show the policies did little to slow the virus while inflicting immense collateral damage. Even some former lockdown supporters, like Cambridge Mayor Sumbul Siddiqui, now express doubts about the decisions made in 2020.
The lockdown era showed us the dangers of unchecked government power and the media’s complicity in amplifying fear. The media’s failure to critically examine these policies in real-time has had lasting consequences. Trust in public health institutions has eroded, and the public is now more skeptical of “expert” advice than ever before. As Dr. Michael Osterholm, an infectious disease expert, admitted, “The lockdowns were never really effective, and the confusion around them sowed a great deal of public distrust in government.”
The lockdown debacle serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of sacrificing liberty for the illusion of safety. The media’s delayed admission of failure is cold comfort to the millions who suffered under these policies. What’s needed now is accountability—not just for the politicians and public health officials who pushed these measures, but for the media outlets that silenced dissent and spread fear.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Death by CHEMICAL RESTRAINTS: How Australia’s elderly and vulnerable were SEDATED into early graves during the COVID scandal
In 2020, Australia’s elderly population faced a grim reality as public health authorities and medical systems implemented policies that not only failed to protect them but actively hastened their deaths. Approximately 75% of Australia’s so-called “covid-19 deaths” occurred in residential aged-care facilities (RACFs), with 40% of these deaths concentrated in just ten facilities, nine of which were in Victoria. The shocking truth? Sedatives like midazolam and morphine were widely used as “chemical restraints,” not to heal but to suppress and control. These drugs, administered under the guise of infection control and palliative care, accelerated the deaths of vulnerable elderly Australians, raising serious questions about the ethics and legality of these practices.
This article exposes how Australia’s public health system, under the banner of pandemic management, abandoned its most vulnerable citizens, depriving them of proper medical care, isolating them from loved ones, and subjecting them to chemical restraints that suppressed their respiratory systems and hastened their demise.
The elderly were not properly treated and cared for
In 2020, Australia recorded 909 “covid-19 deaths,” with 678 of these occurring in RACFs. The case-fatality rate (CFR) for RACF residents was a staggering 33.45%, compared to just 0.04% among RACF staff. This disparity highlights the disproportionate impact of covid-19 on the elderly, particularly those with comorbidities. However, the high CFR in RACFs cannot be explained by the virus alone.
The use of sedatives like midazolam and morphine played a significant role. These drugs, recommended for covid-19 patients and those unable to follow infection control measures, were administered under Australian law despite restrictions on chemical restraint. The evidence suggests that their use was not only widespread but also likely contributed to the elevated death toll in RACFs. By sedating the elderly, medical authorities were able to push other deadly interventions that further caused harm to their health, putting them in critical condition. The subsequent use of ventilators and the acquisition of hospital-acquired infections was part of the process.
Sedation as a "solution": how the system failed
The Australian New Zealand Society of Palliative Medicine (ANZSPM) published guidelines in April 2020 recommending the use of sedatives for covid-19 patients, including those receiving palliative or “end-of-life” care. These guidelines blurred the line between palliative care and end-of-life care, allowing for the widespread use of sedatives even in cases where recovery was uncertain.
By September 2020, the National Covid-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce (NCCET) expanded on these recommendations, advising the use of sedatives to manage symptoms like breathlessness and agitation. The guidelines also suggested minimizing staff interaction with residents by using slow-release medications, effectively isolating patients and reducing their access to care.
The consequences were devastating. Sedatives like midazolam and morphine suppress the central nervous system, exacerbating respiratory issues caused by covid-19. For elderly patients, already vulnerable due to age and comorbidities, these drugs likely hastened their deaths.
Data from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) reveal a surge in the use of sedatives during Australia’s covid-19 waves in 2020. Shortages of midazolam, morphine, and other palliative care drugs were reported, driven by “unexpected consumer demand.”
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
CDC’s new “conflicts of interest” page: A step toward radical transparency or a distraction from Big Pharma’s grip?
In a move that has sparked both praise and criticism, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has launched a new webpage detailing the conflicts of interest among members of its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hailed the initiative as a step toward “radical transparency,” while critics dismissed it as a superficial gesture in the face of mounting public distrust of pharmaceutical influence on public health policy.
The webpage, which lists conflicts of interest declared by ACIP members since 2000, is part of an ongoing effort to address concerns about the integrity of vaccine advisory boards. Critics claim the timing and motivations behind this move raise questions about the CDC’s commitment to true accountability while supporters recognize it as a critical first step toward dismantling the deep-seated influence of Big Pharma on public health decisions.
A long overdue step toward transparency
For decades, critics have raised alarms about the cozy relationships between vaccine advisory board members and pharmaceutical companies. The ACIP, which plays a pivotal role in recommending vaccine schedules and policies, has long been scrutinized for potential conflicts of interest. The new webpage, which compiles disclosures from over 40 current and former voting members, reveals roughly 200 declared conflicts, ranging from consulting fees to patent holdings.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime advocate for vaccine safety and transparency, celebrated the move on social media, stating, “Thank you, CDC, for your commitment to radical transparency.” Kennedy, who has been a vocal critic of pharmaceutical influence on public health, has made transparency a cornerstone of his tenure at HHS.
However, not everyone is convinced that this new tool represents meaningful progress. Paul Offit, a former ACIP member and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, dismissed the initiative as “nothing new.” In an interview with The Hill, Offit stated, “I heard they were going to do this. There’s nothing new. This has always been available to the public.”
The bigger picture: Big Pharma’s influence on public health
The CDC’s new webpage is a small step in addressing a much larger issue: the pervasive influence of pharmaceutical companies on public health policy. Historically, the relationship between regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry has been fraught with conflicts of interest. From the opioid crisis to the rapid approval of COVID-19 vaccines, critics argue that financial ties between regulators and industry have often compromised public trust.
The ACIP, for example, has faced criticism for its role in recommending vaccines that are later found to have safety concerns. Critics point to the Gardasil vaccine, which was fast-tracked by the FDA in 2006 despite concerns about its long-term effects. Similarly, the rapid rollout of COVID-19 vaccines under emergency use authorization has raised questions about whether financial incentives influenced the approval process.
The new webpage, while a step in the right direction, does little to address the systemic issues at play. As Kennedy has repeatedly argued, the pharmaceutical industry’s financial ties to government agencies create a “captured system” where profit often takes precedence over public health.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The case also raises broader concerns about the integrity of the medical system. During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals were accused of prioritizing financial incentives over patient care, leading to unnecessary deaths. Some fear that similar motives may have played a role in this case.
“Hospitals got paid to kill thousands and thousands of COVID patients,” said one critic. “Did they simply follow the same playbook here so that they could have a story to promote their agenda, or did the hospital not follow basic protocols because they are incompetent?”
Another question to ask is, "Were the child's organs procured?" In some wrongful death cases, the victim is sedated so their organs can be harvested and sold.
The death of this Texas child is a chilling reminder of the stakes involved in medical care and public health narratives. Was this a tragic error, or was it something more sinister? As investigations unfold, one thing is clear: The truth must be uncovered, and those responsible must be held accountable.
In the words of Dr. Kory, “This was an otherwise healthy child who came in with a common pneumonia. A routine, appropriate antibiotic would have, I believe, changed that trajectory from what it unfortunately and tragically became.”
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The revelations about Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca’s violations of the UK code of practice demand urgent need for reform, an overhaul of the type of people that oversee pharmaceutical companies. The current system of self-regulation has proven inadequate to protect the public from unethical practices. Stronger oversight, meaningful penalties, and greater transparency are essential to restoring trust in the pharmaceutical industry, if this is even possible now.
In the face of such blatant disregard for ethical standards, one must wonder: will justice ever be served, or will the pharmaceutical industry continue to operate above the law?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
CDC's measles advice centers on vaccination and controversial immunoglobulin therapy
While the CDC does not list treatments for measles, it does recommend two forms of prophylaxis for unvaccinated individuals exposed to the virus: the MMR vaccine within 72 hours of exposure or immunoglobulin within six days. Immunoglobulin, an antibody therapy, has been administered to babies as young as three days old in response to measles exposure.
However, critics argue that immunoglobulin therapy may interfere with the body’s natural immune response. Dr. Suzanne Humphries, co-author of Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History, warned that immunoglobulin “is a set-up for causing an incomplete immunologic response to the infection, which can set the person up for chronic diseases.” Brian Hooker, Ph.D., CHD’s chief scientific officer, echoed this concern, stating that immunoglobulin therapy “will dampen the innate immune response.”
The refusal of Texas health officials to endorse budesonide as a measles treatment is not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern of censorship and suppression. By prioritizing vaccines over all other treatments, medical boards and health authorities are complicit in a system that discriminates against patients and stifles medical innovation. This leads to mass iatrogenic error in hospitals, as patients (who could be helped) are denied basic respiratory relief, oxygen, nutrients, and hydration, while being drugged up, sedated, and put on mechanical ventilators that can do more damage to the lungs and spreads pneumonia and other super bug infections.
As measles outbreaks continue and hospitals remain ill-equipped to treat people right, the question remains: how many more lives will be lost before the medical establishment acknowledges the value of efficacious anti-inflammatory and nutritive treatments? In the words of Dr. Edwards, “We were seeing some good results [with budesonide]. Why not share that information?” The answer lies in the vaccine industry’s stranglehold on medicine—a system that prioritizes profit over patients and ideology over innovation. Until this system is dismantled, countless lives will remain at risk.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. directs FDA to tighten food ingredient safety rules
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has directed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to revise its safety regulations, eliminating a provision that allows companies to self-affirm the safety of food ingredients.
Under the current system, manufacturers can use a rule known as "substances generally recognized as safe" (GRASS) to self-certify that new ingredients are safe for consumption without notifying the FDA. The FDA strongly encourages companies to submit safety notices, but self-affirmation remains a legal pathway.
Kennedy has directed the FDA to tighten its food safety regulation to increase FDA oversight and ensure greater accountability in the food industry. The proposed changes would mandate that companies submit detailed safety data and intended use notifications to the FDA, which maintains a public inventory of all notices, supporting data and response letters.
"For far too long, ingredient manufacturers and sponsors have exploited a loophole that has allowed new ingredients and chemicals, often with unknown safety data, to be introduced into the U.S. food supply without notification to the FDA or the public," Kennedy said. "Eliminating this loophole will provide transparency to consumers, help get our nation's food supply back on track by ensuring that ingredients being introduced into foods are safe and ultimately Make America Healthy Again."
Moreover, the directive, which came as part of his broader agenda to address the nation's chronic illness epidemic, would require companies to publicly notify the FDA of new ingredients and provide supporting safety data before introducing them into the food supply.
Most food industry partners welcome RFK Jr.'s new FDA directive
The announcement has been welcomed by some food industry partners.
For instance, the Consumer Brands Association, which represents companies such as Coca-Cola and WK Kellogg, said that they "look forward to continued engagement with the secretary and the qualified experts within HHS to support public health, build consumer trust and promote consumer choice."
Meanwhile, major companies such as PepsiCo, General Mills, Kraft Heinz, Hershey, Mondelez and Kellanova have yet to comment on the directive.
It also aligns with recent efforts by the FDA to bolster oversight of the food supply. Earlier this year, the agency proposed requiring food companies to display nutrition labels on the front of packaging, a measure aimed at helping consumers make healthier choices.
The FDA has also been restructuring its food division under former Commissioner Robert Califf to enhance oversight of food and agricultural products. Kennedy's directive builds on these efforts, signaling a more proactive approach to food safety regulation.
"The FDA is committed to further safeguarding the food supply by ensuring the appropriate review of ingredients and substances that come into contact with food," FDA Acting Commissioner Sara Brenner posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, shortly after the announcement.
Watch this video about RFK Jr. promising to address the existential threat of chronic disease.
https://www.brighteon.com/8f3a0ef8-cccf-46f9-9da4-ba710ceb329e
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Thanks to Biden’s fear mongering, almost half of Democratic voters favored locking the unvaxxed into government detention facilities, according to an early 2022 Rasmussen poll. The same survey showed that almost half of Democrats favored empowering government to “fine or imprison individuals who publicly question the efficacy” of Covid-19 vaccines on social media. The Biden administration unleashed a massive censorship campaign on social media and beyond that effectively muzzled millions of Americans who doubted the feds.
At that point, most American adults were vaxxed, but the injections were catastrophically failing against the latest covid variant. There were a million new covid cases per day—mainly among the vaxxed—and most covid fatalities were occurring among the fully vaxxed.
But “best and brightest” Washingtonians retained their absolute faith in a command-and-control response to the pandemic. District of Columbia Mayor, Muriel Bowser, decreed that anyone who was not vaccinated and carrying proof of the jab was banned from entering any restaurant, bar, gym, or meeting space in her domain. Affluent Washingtonians happily rushed to get free software apps so the government could track them and their health status. That new app had a spiffy logo that quickly became the ultimate status symbol.
I stopped hosting hikes within DC city limits: I would be damned if I would condone Bowser’s biomedical caste system. But I did venture into DC in early 2022 to pay respects to an editor who was fleeing southward. Exiting at the Dupont Circle metro station, I briefly stepped out of a torrential downpour into an upscale coffee shop. Every table hosted a hefty warning sign: “Masks on & Vaccine Cards out!” Patrons were hectored: “All cafes and restaurants… are REQUIRED by the Mayor’s Office to check vaccine cards of dine-in customers. Thank you for helping us comply with local regulations to remain open!” Why didn’t that establishment just advertise the slogan: “Come Sip with the Gestapo!” I skedaddled before anybody asked to see a vax passport.
I was mystified why people would pay $6.50 for a coffee to be treated worse than parolees. Dupont Circle was home to many of DC’s best educated residents. The more graduate degrees they amassed, the more submissive they became. Flourishing your vax card proved your moral and intellectual superiority over anyone who balked at bending over again.
But it was a different story in Anacostia, the poorest part of the city, where one of the unsung heroes of the pandemic emerged. Blacks had a much lower vaccination rate and the mayor’s edict effectively made many of them second-class citizens. Bowser, Fauci, and a PBS film crew pounded on front doors in Anacostia and hectored residents to get injected. A guy in his 30s came to the front door of his row house, saw Fauci and the TV cameras, and condemned the entire covid carnival: “Y’all campaign is about fear. You all attack people with fear. That’s what this pandemic is.” He scorned the speedy vax approval: “Nine months is definitely not enough for nobody to be taking no vaccination that you all came up with.” Actually, the Biden White House had browbeat the Food and Drug Administration to unjustifiably grant final approval to the Pfizer vax. With the video cameras rolling, he angrily told Fauci and Bowser: “The people in America are not settled with the information that’s been given to us right now.” Watch the PBS Fauci “Vaccine Outreach” Anacostia brawl here.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Meanwhile, the masses panicked. Any PCR test that said “positive” sent them into a downward spiral of worry and brainwashed fear, just as the Vaccine Industrial Complex planned it. Oh my, you better be isolated from society immediately, you’ve tested positive for Fauci Flu! Time for your booster clot shots little Jimmy and Peggy. Be sure to wear TWO masks and stay six feet apart at the quack’s office. We’ll get you all fixed up in no time. Then those same vaxxed kids spread the virus to their other vaxxed playmates and schoolmates due to vaccine virus shedding.
PCR really stands for PROPAGANDA CATAPULT RESULTS because that’s all the tests were really good for – fearmongering about a flu that was no more dangerous than the seasonal flu, that vaccines did not prevent against contraction or spreading, and that was part of a grand depopulation scheme like the world has never seen before.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
PLANDEMIC BLESSING: For those who survived, the PLANDEMIC was a blessing in disguise
Dr. Bhattacharya, recipient of the Samizdat Prize, an award given to journalists, scholars and public figures for resisting censorship and standing for truth, once stated, “Free speech is fundamental for science to function properly.”
Bhattacharya has called out our nation’s scientific bureaucracy, beginning back in 2020, when he first reported to the country that COVID virus was NOT as dangerous as the media and CDC were propagating. He published a study on this, and he called for less restrictions on younger, healthier Americans, and the Pandemic Industrial Complex did not like that at all.
Dr. Bhattacharya’s study was discussed at top levels of the U.S. government, including by Fraudulent Fauci himself and officials in the White House. This information was brought to light thanks to emails made public by a Freedom of Information Act request that was granted.
Dr. Bhattacharya’s study and essay revealed that lockdowns were failing to suppress the spread of Covid-19 and were not based on science
“Follow the Science,” Fauci regurgitated over and over. “I am the science,” he said, even though he was using conspiracy guesswork and haphazard protocols that ended up killing millions of people who would have otherwise survived the Fauci Flu.
Dr. Bhattacharya even went so far as to call out all the fear-mongering about the fatality rate of the virus, saying it was way off and irresponsible. Stanford faculty did not like this at all either.
Of course, the fake science scamdemic pushers declared Dr. Bhattacharya’s research to be “unsound,” and Stanford put together a front group to “investigate,” which meant wreck the doctor’s reputation as quickly as possible. In April of 2020, Buzzfeed presstitutes jumped on the pharma bandwagon and attacked Bhattacharya and his colleagues, claiming they failed to disclose funding for their study, even though they had. They called him a fake whistleblower and tried to discredit him on all fronts. Then he got death threats and racist attacks from the fake news media. This is what happens when you spread the truth and reveal Big Pharma’s propaganda and killing machine.
Looking back now, the whole plandemic was a blessing in disguise, because now we can see the forest for the trees. Never again will the Plandemic Industrial Complex be able to pull the wool over so many eyes and mouths (mask enforcement). Now it’s Fauci that’s been discredited and his lies dismantled for the world to see. Now it’s the vaccine industry that’s falling apart at the seams, with their deathly clot shots that made matters much worse.
To “follow the science” now means to unravel the lies about all vaccines. To follow the science now means to do actual research into medicine and reveal how the side effects are more dangerous than the symptoms they manage. The sickest people on earth are those who take prescription drugs daily and get vaccinated with all the CDC recommendations.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A new era of scientific integrity
RFK Jr.’s decision to terminate these grants is a watershed moment in the fight for scientific integrity. For too long, the NIH has served as a mouthpiece for the pharmaceutical industry, rubber-stamping unsafe products and silencing critics. By defunding studies that prioritize compliance over safety, RFK Jr. is sending a clear message: the era of ideological narratives parading as science is over.
But the battle is far from won. The pharmaceutical industry, with its deep pockets and powerful allies, will not go down without a fight. Already, critics are accusing RFK Jr. of “undermining public health” and “endangering lives.” But as the evidence mounts — from the SV40 promoters in mRNA vaccines to the alarming rise in adverse events — it is clear that the real danger lies in continuing to ignore the truth.
As RFK Jr. reshapes the NIH, one question looms large: can public trust in vaccines be restored? The answer, perhaps, lies in the words of Thomas Jefferson: “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” In a free society, individuals must be allowed to make informed decisions based on transparent data, not coerced into compliance through propaganda and fear.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
"There is no known person-to-person spread at this time," the CDC stated in its most recent update. However, the agency continues to monitor the situation closely, particularly as the virus spreads to dairy cattle and other animals.
Kennedy’s warning about the dangers of vaccinating poultry underscores the need for caution in managing the outbreak. While vaccines may seem like a quick fix, their potential to drive viral mutations and create new risks for human health cannot be ignored.
A call for a new approach
Kennedy’s remarks highlight the importance of rethinking our approach to animal and human health. Rather than relying on industrial-scale interventions like mass culling or leaky vaccines, we should prioritize strategies that harness natural immunity, support sustainable farming practices and protect both animal and human health.
As the bird flu crisis continues to unfold, Kennedy’s warning serves as a timely reminder of the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health. By learning from past mistakes and embracing a more holistic approach, we can build a healthier, more resilient future for all.
In the words of Kennedy himself: "We’ve killed 166 million chickens. That’s why we have an egg crisis." It’s time to ask ourselves: Is there a better way?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Shaw connects the vaccine debate to the broader agenda of the Great Reset, a concept promoted by the World Economic Forum (WEF). He argues that the pandemic has been used as a pretext to implement sweeping changes to the global economy and society, with vaccines playing a central role. Shaw criticizes the close ties between the pharmaceutical industry, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the WHO, suggesting that these entities are more focused on profit and control than on public health.
Ultimately, Shaw's book is not just about vaccines; it's about the struggle for human freedom. He calls for a more balanced and nuanced approach to the vaccine debate, one that acknowledges the potential benefits of vaccines while also recognizing their risks. Shaw advocates for transparency, accountability and informed consent, urging people to question the official narrative and demand better science and better policies.
Watch this video about Christopher A. Shaw's "Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars: Fighting for Human Freedom during the Great Reset."
https://www.brighteon.com/80b5dc1e-dcbc-4858-a369-42375e8207eb
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Compounding the problem is the modern vaccine schedule, which includes up to 40 shots by adolescence, with as many as five administered simultaneously. This combination of multiple food proteins and adjuvants creates a perfect storm for immune system dysfunction, contributing to the rise in food allergies, asthma and other allergic diseases.
A call for urgent action
Given the scale and severity of the food allergy epidemic, Arumugham and other researchers are calling for urgent changes to vaccine policy. These include removing food proteins from vaccines, re-evaluating the use of adjuvants like aluminum compounds, and including food allergy warnings in vaccine package inserts.
“The evidence is clear,” Arumugham said. “We need to stop injecting proteins into children before they’ve had a chance to eat them. This is not just about preventing allergies—it’s about protecting the health and well-being of future generations.”
The bigger picture
The implications of Arumugham’s research extend far beyond food allergies. They challenge the very foundation of modern vaccinology and raise important questions about the safety and efficacy of current vaccine practices.
As the medical establishment continues to dismiss these concerns, the burden falls on independent researchers and concerned parents to demand transparency and accountability.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
As we face the possibility of future pandemics, we must remember the lessons of COVID-19: Question authority, reject propaganda, and never let fear dictate policy. The lockdowns were a catastrophic mistake, and the best way to ensure they never happen again is to hold those responsible to account — and to never forget the price we paid for their hubris.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
These shortages coincided with spikes in prescriptions for sedatives, particularly in RACFs. The timing of these surges suggests that sedatives were used not only for palliative care but also as chemical restraints to control residents deemed “difficult” or “wanderers.” The result? A “pull-forward effect” where increased sedation likely hastened mortality among vulnerable individuals.
Deaths by other causes: the hidden toll
The use of chemical restraints in RACFs did not just impact covid-19 deaths. Data shows elevated mortality from other causes, such as dementia, during the pandemic. In 2020, dementia deaths exceeded those recorded during Australia’s worst flu season in 2019, despite the near-total absence of influenza.
This suggests that the increased use of sedatives and the isolation of residents in RACFs contributed to a broader decline in health and well-being. The elderly, already marginalized by the pandemic response, were further victimized by policies that prioritized social distancing and isolation over compassionate care.
The use of chemical restraints in Australia’s RACFs during the covid-19 pandemic represents a profound betrayal of trust. Public health authorities and medical systems, tasked with protecting the vulnerable, instead subjected them to policies that hastened their deaths. Sedation became a tool of convenience, a way to manage understaffing and infection control at the expense of human dignity.
The elderly, isolated from their families and denied access to early treatments, were left to suffer in silence. Their deaths, whether labeled as “covid-19” or attributed to other causes, are a testament to the failures of a system that prioritized control over care.
As the world moves forward, the lessons of Australia’s pandemic response must not be forgotten. The elderly deserve better than to be sedated into early graves. They deserve compassion, dignity, and the right to live their final days surrounded by loved ones, not chemical restraints.
This is not just a story of medical malpractice — it is a story of systemic failure, human rights abuses, and the tragic consequences of prioritizing fear over humanity.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Vaccine zealots dismiss it as a distraction
While the CDC’s initiative has been praised by transparency advocates, some see it as a distraction from more pressing issues. Offit, for instance, argued that the focus on conflicts of interest detracts from the real threat of vaccine-preventable diseases. “I think it’s just a distraction,” he told The Hill. “I think RFK Jr. believes that the pharmaceutical industry has captured committees like the ACIP or the FDA vaccine advisory committee, for which he has no evidence. But it sells in the current climate, this notion of conspiracy, that there’s dark forces working behind the scenes to do harm.”
Yet, for many Americans, the notion of “dark forces” is not a conspiracy but a reality. The pharmaceutical industry’s financial contributions to political campaigns, lobbying efforts and even academic research have created a system where profit often trumps public health. The CDC’s new webpage, while a small step toward transparency, does little to address these systemic issues.
A call for true accountability
The CDC’s new conflicts of interest webpage is a welcome, if overdue, step toward transparency. However, it is only a first step in addressing the pervasive influence of Big Pharma on public health policy. True accountability will require more than a list of disclosures; it will require systemic reforms to ensure that public health decisions are made in the best interest of the people, not the pharmaceutical industry.
As Kennedy and other advocates continue to push for radical transparency, the CDC must go further to rebuild public trust. This means not only disclosing conflicts of interest but also addressing the financial ties that have long compromised the integrity of public health policy. Only then can we hope to create a system that prioritizes health over profit—and restores faith in the institutions tasked with protecting our well-being.
In the words of Kennedy, “Radical transparency is not just a slogan; it’s a necessity.” The CDC’s new webpage is a small step in the right direction, but the journey toward true accountability has only just begun.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. takes on Big Pharma: How diet could end the antidepressant era
In a bold move that could upend the $15 billion antidepressant industry, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is spotlighting groundbreaking research linking poor diet to mental health disorders like depression and anxiety. Drawing on studies from Stanford, Harvard, and other institutions, Kennedy argues that the toxic ingredients in America’s food supply are fueling a mental health crisis—and that Big Pharma is profiting from the fallout.
With 40% of U.S. teenagers now struggling with anxiety or depression, Kennedy’s message is resonating: food is medicine, and changing what we eat could be the key to healing.
The science behind the connection
Recent studies reveal that a poor-quality diet—high in sugar, saturated fats, and ultra-processed foods—can alter brain chemistry and structure, leading to mental health issues. Research from the University of Reading found that unhealthy diets reduce grey matter volume and disrupt neurotransmitter levels in the brain, particularly gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate. These changes are associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety, including rumination, a hallmark of mental health disorders.
Dr. Piril Hepsomali, a lead researcher on the study, explained, “We can eat ourselves well! Ultimately, we see that people who have an unhealthy diet – high in sugar and saturated fat – have imbalanced excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission, as well as reduced volume of grey matter in the frontal part of the brain.”
Kennedy has been vocal about these findings, telling Fox News, “There are studies coming out of Stanford and Harvard that show a lot of mental illness, including anxiety and depression, are related to food… Food is medicine. By changing your diet, you can lose some of those diagnoses.”
Threatening Big Pharma profits
The implications of this research are seismic. If diet is a primary driver of mental health issues, the demand for antidepressants—a cornerstone of Big Pharma’s profits—could plummet. Kennedy has criticized the pharmaceutical industry for perpetuating the narrative that mental health problems are solely a matter of brain chemistry, requiring medication. “We are letting down these kids. And there is a moral issue here… it’s a financial issue. Health care costs are going to sink us. And the only way that we’re going to solve it is by changing what we eat,” he said.
The stakes are high. In the U.S., 40% of adults are obese, compared to just 5% in Japan, where life expectancy is seven years longer on average. Over 1,000 ingredients banned in Europe are still allowed in America’s food supply, contributing to a toxic diet that Kennedy argues is making people sick—and Big Pharma rich.
A growing movement for cleaner food
Kennedy’s campaign is already sparking change. Restaurant chains like Steak ’n Shake and Sweetgreen are ditching harmful seed oils in favor of healthier alternatives like beef tallow and avocado oil. Outback Steakhouse is also reportedly reevaluating its ingredients in response to consumer demand for cleaner food.
This shift reflects a broader awakening to the connection between diet and mental health. Many people think antidepressants are the solution to depression, but it's time to shine a spotlight on the significant role diet plays in mental health.
RFK Jr.’s crusade against Big Pharma and toxic food is more than a critique—it’s a call to action. By highlighting the link between diet and mental health, he is challenging Americans to rethink their relationship with food and demand accountability from corporations that prioritize profits over public health. As the science continues to mount, it is becoming increasingly clear that the path to better mental health may start on our plates, not in a pill bottle.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia