19571
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
Sen. Ron Johnson @SenRonJohnsonUS accuses CDC official in charge of COVID-19 injections of deleting records amid Congressional GOP scrutiny
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) has accused a key official of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of deleting records, ostensibly to impede investigations by Congress on the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
Johnson pointed his finger at the CDC's Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, who is responsible for overseeing COVID-19 safety. The senator put forward his accusation in letters addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel and Juliet Hodgkins, acting inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
"HHS officials recently informed me that Dr. Shimabukuro's records remain lost and, potentially, removed from HHS' email system altogether," Johnson wrote. The senator for the Badger State pointed out that the CDC official's "potential mishandling of his official records" was "highly concerning."
Given this development, Johnson called upon Bondi, Patel and Hodgkins to investigate whether Shimabukuro and other officials in agencies under the HHS "deleted or destroyed official agency records." The senator also demanded an inquiry into whether files were intentionally deleted to "avoid or subvert Congressional oversight or the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)."
"Any attempt to obstruct or interfere with my investigatory efforts would be grounds for contempt of Congress," Johnson warned. Anybody found guilty of contempt of Congress faces a hefty fine and 12 months behind bars.
NIH official's shocking emails: "I delete anything I don't want public"
Under the Federal Records Act, government officials are required to preserve materials "made or received by a federal agency under federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business." It was enacted in 1950 to prevent the loss of government documents – a response to past incidents where vital records were destroyed to avoid scrutiny.
Shimabukuro isn't the only one allegedly guilty of violating this law, however. Dr. David Morens of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has previously been in the crosshairs of Johnson and other GOP lawmakers. Morens, a longtime adviser to former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, went under fire after emails where he admitted to avoiding official correspondence channels were made public.
"I always communicate on Gmail because my NIH email is FOIA'd constantly," Morens wrote in an email from 2021. "I delete anything I don’t want to see in the New York Times."
In another email, Morens insinuated that Fauci – who retired in 2022 – discouraged discussions linking COVID-19 to a laboratory in China's Wuhan province. "Tony doesn't want his fingerprints on origin stories," Morens wrote.
The House of Representatives subpoenaed Morens back in October 2023, with former Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) – then the chairman of the House COVID-19 Select Subcommittee – warning that "this obstruction will not be tolerated."
Johnson later said of Shimabukuro's obstruction: "The extent to which HHS officials systemically mishandled, deleted, or destroyed their communications, data and other information relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and the vaccines must be thoroughly investigated."
As investigations proceed, legal and political battles loom. What is clear, however, is that lawmakers and the public will continue demanding answers about what was erased and why.
Watch Dr. Tom Shimabukuro of the CDC admitting that the COVID-19 vaccines cause "debilitating illness" in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/1e1885b2-97a8-488d-9388-81de97826dfc
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
But premature birth at any stage carries risks:
• Lifelong chronic illness (heart disease, diabetes, kidney failure).
• Cognitive impairments, developmental delays.
• Higher infant mortality rates.
Dr. Peter Selley, a U.K. physician, slammed regulators: "How many more trials are needed [to prove this is dangerous]?"
Global regulators disagree—while pregnant women pay the price
The FDA’s restricted window (32-36 weeks) contradicts other agencies:
• Europe (EMA): 24-36 weeks.
• France (HAS): 32-36 weeks.
• Germany (STIKO): No recommendation—citing insufficient safety data.
French scientist Hélène Banoun asked, "How can we justify that EMA, FDA, and STIKO disagree on a vaccine for vulnerable pregnant women?" The answer: Corporate influence. Pfizer’s $95 billion COVID windfall bought it political leverage, and the FDA’s approval—despite known risks—proves regulators serve Pharma, not patients.
When GSK’s RSV vaccine caused harm, it halted trials. Pfizer hid the data and pushed forward. The result? Another case of profits over people—where pregnant women and newborns bear the consequences. Karl Jablonowski of Children’s Health Defense nailed it: "A vaccine that increases prematurity is self-defeating—preterm babies are most vulnerable to RSV."
Will lawsuits finally hold Pfizer accountable? Or will we keep sacrificing mothers and children at the altar of "trust the science"—while corporations laugh their way to the bank?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Congressional Republicans have long held that the 2019 World Military Games may have been "one of the earliest super spreader events" of the pandemic. A House Foreign Affairs Committee report issued in August 2021 reinforced this position, suggesting that the virus could have been spreading in Wuhan as early as September 2019.
The investigation continues
The release of the suppressed military report has added a new layer of complexity to the ongoing debate over the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. It underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in public health crises and raises critical questions about the early spread of the virus and the actions of both the Chinese and U.S. governments. As the debate continues, the new disclosures are expected to spark further congressional inquiries into what the Biden administration knew, when it knew it, and why it withheld this report from public view for so long. The answers to these questions could have far-reaching implications for global health security and international relations.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
• Serious health risks: The MMR vaccine has been associated with serious health risks, including febrile seizures, anaphylaxis, meningitis, encephalitis, thrombocytopenia, arthralgia and vasculitis. A 2004 study found that boys vaccinated with their first MMR vaccine on time were 67% more likely to be diagnosed with autism compared to boys who received the vaccine after their third birthday.
The role of natural immunity
Proponents of natural immunity argue that contracting measles naturally provides more comprehensive and long-term immunity compared to the vaccine. While the illness can occasionally be serious, the risk of permanent injury and death from the MMR vaccine has not been proven to be less than that of measles itself.
Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), emphasized the importance of offering single measles shots as a safer alternative to the MMR vaccine. "If the Department of Health really wants to use a vaccine strategy to go after measles, then they should offer people a single measles shot. It would be safer than the MMR, which has proven to carry many serious risks."
Conclusion
The death of Daisy Hildebrand serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges in treating infectious diseases. While the measles vaccine has played a role in reducing the incidence of the disease, the case highlights the critical importance of proper medical care and the need for ongoing research into vaccine safety and efficacy. As the debate continues, it is crucial to balance public health measures with individual health concerns and to ensure that medical errors are identified and addressed to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Last month, a 6-year-old child in West Texas died after developing pneumonia while recovering from measles. Media seized the opportunity to disparage the parents, members of a Mennonite community, for not vaccinating their child.
As our science and CHD. TV teams uncovered — after enlisting experts to review the child’s medical records — the little girl died not “from” measles, as media claimed, but from a tragic medical error.
In fact, the hospital properly diagnosed the little girl’s pneumonia — a community-acquired pneumonia that, when treated properly is not life-threatening. Unfortunately, the doctors failed to use the standard antibiotic indicated for treating her pneumonia until it was too late.
Even after CHD exposed the accurate cause of death, The New York Times reported the 6-year-old died from measles — and accused us of making “unfounded claims” about the death.
Last week, a second child in West Texas died. The media and Texas health officials reported the death as “measles pulmonary failure.” CHD is working with the child’s parents to analyze her medical records. We will report, accurately, on what we find.
The media have accused CHD and the health freedom movement — or “anti-vaxxers” as reporters love to call us — of “weaponizing” the tragic death of the 6-year-old who died because of a medical error. (We should point out that death by medical error is not uncommon in the U.S. It’s estimated that at least 250,000 people die every year as a result of the wrong diagnosis or treatment, making it the third-leading cause of death).
The death of any child, for any reason, is heartbreaking. But in this case, who are the real “weaponizers?”
If media are genuinely concerned about children’s lives, where are the reports on children’s injuries and deaths from COVID-19 vaccines? From MMR vaccines? From the other 14 shots on the CDC-recommended schedule?
Last month, CHD reported on the senseless death of a 1-year-old roughly 12 hours after the child’s pediatrician insisted on administering six shots of 12 vaccines at once.
Where were the headlines deploring this child’s death, denouncing the child’s pediatrician? Where were the reports on the known dangers of “catching up” babies and children on vaccines?
As the media remain radio silent on the carnage inflicted on innocent children by a powerful, greedy industry and its minions in Congress, CHD is honoring the legacy of these children by reporting the facts, telling the truth and insisting on the rights of parents to make independent, informed medical decisions.
This latest round of attacks on the health freedom movement is a measure of pharma’s fear. We are winning. Pharma knows it.
We have no intention of backing down from the facts: Vaccines cause serious injuries, including death. As Big Pharma and Big Media wage a renewed battle for the hearts and minds of parents, we must strengthen our resolve, we must stay true to our mission.
Our children deserve nothing less.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The military, as an institution, is built on the principles of honor, courage, and commitment. Forcing service members to take a vaccine against their will or informed decision-making capabilities is a betrayal of these principles. The spineless act of coercing fellow service members should be punished through swift termination and dishonorable discharge. The military's best, strongest, and most courageous members should be those who stand up for what is right, even when it is difficult.
As the military continues to deal with the aftermath of the vaccine mandates, the court's decision and the Trump administration's actions offer a glimmer of hope. The fight for individual liberty and the protection of constitutional rights is far from over, but these developments are a reminder that the rule of law and the courage of individuals can still prevail. In the words of former Marine Capt. Dale Saran, "That’s the fraud that’s at the heart of our case." The truth will continue to emerge, and justice will be served.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Researchers suggested strain mismatch—a misalignment between the vaccine and circulating flu variants—may explain the poor performance. Lyons-Weiler added that thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative in 98.7% of administered doses, could weaken immune responses. Thimerosal has been tied to neurodevelopmental risks in earlier studies, raising further safety concerns.
CDC data shows declining flu vaccine uptake among healthcare workers, signaling growing skepticism. “Annual flu vaccine strategies may need a serious rethink,” wrote TrialSite News, urging policymakers to address evidence of potential harm.
The study’s implications extend beyond this flu season, challenging the foundation of mass vaccination campaigns. As Baker noted, “It may be asking for too much to expect [the vaccine] to be highly effective year after year.” With public trust in vaccines wavering, health officials face pressure to reevaluate blanket recommendations—and the science behind them.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The implications of this audit are far-reaching. If the federal government decides to withhold funding due to noncompliance, it could have severe economic consequences for the state. Additionally, the proposed payroll tax hikes could place a significant burden on businesses, potentially leading to job cuts and economic slowdown.
Conclusion
The state auditor's report underscores the critical need for improved oversight and accountability in California's management of federal programs. As the state grapples with the fallout from the audit, it is clear that significant reforms are necessary to restore public trust and ensure the responsible use of taxpayer dollars. The federal government's response to these findings will be closely watched, as it could set a precedent for how other states are held accountable for their use of federal funds.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Researchers from Yale University are currently investigating PVS, hoping to identify immunological patterns that could explain the condition. Their work, though preliminary, offers a glimmer of hope for those suffering from PVS and underscores the need for continued research into the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines.
The German study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that mRNA vaccines may have unintended genetic consequences. The findings highlight the importance of rigorous, long-term safety monitoring and the need for further research to fully understand the implications of these genetic changes.
Watch Dr. Robert Malone warning that vaccine developers will never stop circumventing people's free will in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/2f8b3902-27dd-4866-a2e0-0c8c8cfe7806
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Texas child’s “measles pulmonary failure” sparks debate as media ignores vaccine risks and medical errors
The hidden side of measles hysteria
When 8-year-old Daisy Hildebrand died in April from what Texas health officials labeled "measles pulmonary failure," mainstream outlets like CNN and The Washington Post rushed to frame the tragedy as a cautionary tale about vaccine hesitancy. Missing from the headlines? The hospital’s refusal to disclose Daisy’s treatment protocol—or whether medical negligence played a role.
This pattern is nothing new. Every measles-related death becomes a media spectacle, while the thousands of annual MMR vaccine injuries—seizures, autism, and even fatalities—are buried by the same outlets. In February, another Texas child, a 6-year-old, died after measles led to pneumonia. But when Children’s Health Defense (CHD) obtained her medical records, renowned pulmonologist Dr. Pierre Kory concluded she died from medical errors, including delayed antibiotic treatment. The New York Times dismissed the claim as "unfounded," omitting Kory’s credentials—a glaring omission in what should be objective journalism.
Vaccine risks vs. measles: A distorted narrative
While the mainstream media and health authorities emphasize the importance of vaccination, they often fail to disclose the serious risks associated with the MMR vaccine. The vaccine, which protects against measles, mumps, and rubella, has been linked to a range of adverse reactions, including febrile seizures, anaphylaxis, meningitis, encephalitis, thrombocytopenia, arthralgia, and vasculitis. According to the package insert for Merck’s MMRII, the vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
Research by Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) reveals that immunity from the MMR vaccine wanes over time, with about 60% of vaccinated children susceptible to sub-clinical measles infection and 33% of adults susceptible to clinical infection by age 24-26. This waning immunity suggests that the vaccine may not provide the long-term protection it is often touted to offer.
Moreover, a 2004 study found that boys vaccinated with their first MMR dose on time were 67% more likely to be diagnosed with autism compared to those vaccinated after their third birthday. Between 2000 and 2024, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) recorded 144 deaths following MMR or MMRV vaccination, compared to nine measles-related deaths reported to the CDC during the same period. Given that VAERS is a passive reporting system, the actual number of vaccine-related injuries and deaths may be significantly higher.
Meanwhile, measles itself confers lifelong natural immunity—something the MMR can’t replicate. Yet public health officials never mention this. Instead, they push mass vaccination while ignoring troubling financial ties: Merck made 2.485 billion from MMR sales in 2024, while GSK pocketed over 411 million.
Why aren’t alternative treatments part of the conversation?
Clinics in Texas have quietly reported success treating measles complications with:
• Cod liver oil (packed with immune-boosting vitamins A and D)
• Budesonide (an anti-inflammatory steroid)
• Clarithromycin (a standard antibiotic)
But these options don’t generate pharmaceutical revenue—and thus, they’re excluded from mainstream coverage.
In 1962, The Saturday Evening Post exposed how Big Pharma colluded with regulators to downplay thalidomide’s birth defect risks—a scandal that shattered public trust. Today, history repeats itself as corporate media amplifies measles fear-mongering while sidelining MMR dangers, medical errors, and profit motives.
Will the truth about vaccine risks ever break through—or will the next tragic death simply be exploited to push more jabs?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
DEATH BY DOCTOR: Why and how doctors are now PAID TO KILL their patients
1 Doctors as Agents of Depopulation - Coleman alleges that doctors are being manipulated into killing or neglecting patients under the guise of combating climate change, targeting the elderly, disabled, and vulnerable first.
2 The medical establishment is prioritizing "environmental sustainability" over patient care, using tools like the NHS’s "Green Physician Toolkit" to justify cutting treatments, reducing in-person care, and promoting ineffective "green" alternatives (e.g., remote consultations, nature therapies).
3 The destruction of healthcare is tied to the UN’s alleged plan for a "world government," where elites cull populations via medical neglect, economic control, and environmental policies.
4 Healthcare’s decline is framed as deliberate, with comparisons to China’s technocracy, where individual health is sacrificed for systemic "sustainability" goals.
In America, unless you’ve got a broken bone, deep wound, or are having a baby, you might want to avoid going to the hospital, because more and more now U.S. hospitals are becoming like third world hospices. It’s not that ‘good’ kind of risk you want to take. Why? Doctors make more money in this country if they make you sick, keep you sick, and even get paid serious bonuses if you die under their care. Sounds like a tin foil hatted conspiracy theory, but as they say, the proof is in the pudding, and this pudding is toxic.
Forget about actual useful medicine and natural remedies, “science” says nobody’s medical needs take priority over the “climate change” conspiracy theory
As part of a depopulation agenda backed by billionaires like Bill Gates, doctors in America have all kinds of excuses for restricting medical care that people need and also promoting dirty medicine that people obviously do NOT need. Believe it or not, doctors are using “global warming” as a reason to deny medical care to patients. They call it the “Green Physician Toolkit” and it was published by the Royal College of Physicians. It’s recommended for U.S. health practitioners to “prioritize environmental sustainability over patient care,” because FAKE climate change is more important since it’s a “major threat to global health.”
In other words, because cows are farting so much these days, the glaciers are all melting and the polar bears can’t find any food, so people who need dire medical attention in hospitals won’t be getting it because the money and resources must all be allocated to save the polar bears and prevent cow flatulating worldwide. On top of that, the World Health Organization says the science is settled on global warming and no doctors anywhere in the world should ever try to debate the science on it. Just deny your patients care and keep your mouth shut about it, they are essentially told. It’s science!
Sounds just like Fauci during the plandemic when he said the science was settled and “follow the science” and “I AM the Science!” – even though there was NO science regarding safety or efficacy behind the deadly mRNA clot shots, wearing masks 24/7, social distancing, or lockdowns.
Are you ready to be injected with the Climate Vaccine? It’s coming. You too can help reduce the heat of the sun by injecting gene-mutation “technology” that creates billions of tiny prions in your blood that gather together to form rubbery clots that help feed the polar bears and stop cows from farting. This is Modern Medicine and Science so don’t you ever even try to question it or become a “vaccine skeptic,” or you will be force vaccinated at gunpoint by the INTERPOL VAX SQUAD.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
What’s next, uranium renamed “ur-anus-all” and put in vaccines that are deemed “safe and effective?” Maybe pharma will put some rattlesnake venom combined with some heroin and make that a “vaccine” that tricks human cells into producing infant zombies who spit venom and are addicted to fentanyl from birth. Don’t put anything past Big Pharma. After all, they are STILL pushing the Covid clot shots on all children as part of the CDC’s recommended childhood vaccine schedule.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
New York vaccine mandate lawsuits gain momentum as Bhattacharya and Makary confirmed to lead NIH and FDA
Plaintiffs in two high-profile lawsuits challenging New York City's Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine mandates for municipal workers are hopeful that the Senate confirmations of Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Marty Makary to lead top U.S. health agencies will bolster their legal battles.
On March 25, the Senate confirmed Bhattacharya as the new director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Makary as the new commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Both doctors submitted affidavits in federal court in Kane v. de Blasio and New Yorkers for Religious Liberty (NYFRL) v. City of New York on Oct. 4, 2021.
The two lawsuits represent thousands of city employees, including teachers, firefighters, police officers, sanitation workers and medical professionals, who were terminated or displaced for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine. Kane v. de Blasio focuses on educators, while NYFRL v. City of New York covers all municipal workers who were denied religious exemptions.
Both cases argue that the city's refusal to accommodate religious objections violated the First Amendment. The lawsuits are at different stages in the federal appeals process and could eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court.
At that time, Bhattacharya and Makary asserted that unvaccinated individuals do not pose a public health threat, natural immunity from prior COVID-19 infection is robust and may be superior to vaccine-induced immunity and mandates ignoring natural immunity are scientifically unsound.
Sujata Gibson, lead attorney for the plaintiffs, recalled how Bhattacharya and Makary stepped in to assist. "When I cold-called Dr. Makary and Dr. Bhattacharya on a weekend, they didn't hesitate, they dropped everything to help us, pro bono, on an emergency motion. Their generosity was a game-changer for our fight."
With both doctors now leading major federal health agencies, plaintiffs believe their legal arguments, rooted in the same scientific principles, could gain traction in court.
"Children's Health Defense (CHD) was the first organization in the nation to stand with fired New York City workers using unbiased science from Dr. Bhattacharya and Dr. Makary," said Mary Holland, CEO of CHD. "We have every reason to expect that these scientists will rely on the same unbiased science as they will now lead NIH and FDA."
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. could be another "hope" for lawsuits against COVID-19 vaccine mandates
Aside from the Senate confirmations of Bhattacharya and Makary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., founder and former chairman of CHD, was also appointed to lead the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Kennedy, a longtime critic of vaccine mandates and government overreach in public health, has vowed to restore scientific transparency and medical freedom. His leadership marks a stark departure from the 2021 era when dissenting voices, including those of Bhattacharya and Makary, were sidelined or censored for questioning mainstream COVID-19 policies.
Now, their once-suppressed perspectives are being elevated to the highest levels of federal health policy.
In other words, the plaintiffs have another reason to be hopeful in their lawsuits against COVID-19 vaccine mandates that affected their personal lives a few years back.
Watch the video below of Harrison Smith explaining the impact of vaccine mandates on the food supply.
https://www.brighteon.com/72bbdc27-1be9-44e2-a880-1e9a35963502
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
DEATH by VACCINE or face PRISON time: Canadian Freedom Convoy leaders CONVICTED for protesting forced vaccination during the Covid Plandemic
So, which is it? Do you prefer to have your entire body and brain flooded with spike prions that cause heart attacks, strokes and turbo cancer, or would you rather go to prison for 10 years for “resisting” the plandemic clot shots? You choose. This is exactly what the “Freedom Convoy” of Canadian truckers are dealing with right now, believe it or not.
Two organizers of Canada’s 2022 "Freedom Convoy" protests were convicted Friday of mischief charges, reigniting debates over government overreach during COVID-19 mandates. Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, who led truckers’ demonstrations against vaccine requirements, were found guilty of obstructing public property after a weeks-long blockade of Ottawa’s Parliament Hill.
The verdict comes over two years after former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked emergency powers—later deemed unconstitutional—to quash the protests. The case echoes similar tensions in the U.S., where truckers protested Biden’s policies, underscoring enduring divisions over pandemic-era mandates.
The Convictions and Legal Battle
Lich and Barber faced multiple charges stemming from the February 2022 protests, which paralyzed downtown Ottawa and border crossings. While acquitted of most counts, the mischief convictions carry up to a decade in prison if damages exceeded $5,000. Their defense argued they never incited illegality, pointing to their cooperation with authorities.
The case also spotlighted Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act, which enabled asset freezes and arrests. In January 2024, a federal court ruled the move violated Canada’s Charter of Rights. Justice Richard Mosley found the government’s actions lacked "justification, transparency, and intelligibility."
The Canadian protests inspired similar movements abroad, including U.S. truckers circling Washington, D.C., in opposition to vaccine policies. Critics warn the case sets a precedent for suppressing dissent, while supporters argue the crackdown was necessary to restore order.
The convictions of Lich and Barber close a contentious chapter in Canada’s pandemic response but lingering legal and political questions remain. With emergency powers ruled unconstitutional, the case reinforces scrutiny over how democracies balance public health mandates with civil liberties—a debate far from resolved.
Thank God and the patriots of America that the Fascist reign of terror is over in this country, and nobody has to worry about Trump putting natural health advocates in jail for protesting dirty vaccines or the next plandemic “mandates” that come down the pike. It’s nice to know the FDA won’t be kicking down doors and dragging people out of their homes or vehicles for peaceful protests or resisting the Big Pharma tyranny that besieged us all under Biden and Obama. Keep draining that swamp Trump, you’re doing a great job.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. unveils major overhauls to HHS: A risky gamble or a new era for public health?
In a bold move that has stirred both hope and controversy, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced a sweeping overhaul of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on Thursday, March 27.
This transformation includes the creation of a dedicated unit for vaccine injuries under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and a significant reduction in the federal health agency's workforce by 10,000 jobs. The announcement, made during an interview with NewsNation's Chris Cuomo, marks a pivotal moment in the administration’s efforts to reshape the nation’s public health landscape.
Kennedy emphasized that the new CDC unit will be a "priority focus" for his administration. This unit, he added, will operate in tandem with the health secretary previously announced vaccine injury reporting system. This new system will be "more accurate than the existing Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System," Kennedy claims.
The news of the new CDC vaccine injuries unit comes amid growing concerns from the public about vaccine safety and the increasing number of reported injuries. The decision to create this unit reflects the need for more transparency in reporting adverse events.
Also included in the overhaul is a significant reduction of roughly 10,000 jobs to the HHS workforce. This downsizing is part of a larger effort to eliminate bureaucratic inefficiencies and reduce wasteful spending. The department currently employs 82,000 people, but this number will drop to 62,000 once the cuts are implemented.
The job reductions will be felt across various agencies, with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) losing 3,500 employees; the CDC shedding 2,400 positions; and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) seeing a decrease of 1,200 employees. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will experience a smaller reduction of about 300 workers.
"Over time, bureaucracies like HHS become wasteful and inefficient, even when most of their staff are dedicated and competent civil servants," Kennedy said in defense of the job cuts. He expressed belief that these changes will ultimately benefit taxpayers and improve the department's ability to serve the American public.
Kennedy also sets up new HHS unit in line with MAHA agenda
As part of the HHS restructuring, the department will consolidate its 28 divisions into 15 and cut its 10 regional offices to five. A new Administration for a Healthy America (AHA) will be created, a move that lines up with Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda.
The new AHA combines offices that address addiction, toxic substances and occupational safety into one central unit – with the aim of streamlining operations and improving coordination across different areas of public health. The AHA will include the following agencies under the HHS:
• Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health
• Health Resources and Services Administration
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
• Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (under the CDC)
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (under the CDC)
While the overhaul promises to bring about significant changes, it also raises concerns about the potential impact on public health. Critics argue that the job cuts could lead to delays in drug and medical device reviews, as well as missed deadlines. Moreover, they argue that the elimination of certain CDC divisions – such as those focused on global health, domestic HIV prevention and injury prevention – raise serious alarms.
Ultimately, the reorganization is designed to eliminate redundancies and ensure that resources are used more effectively. The HHS overhaul represents a dramatic shift in the way the federal government approaches public health.
Watch Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discussing how toxins in food are linked to anxiety and depression.
https://www.brighteon.com/2db16ebf-626c-47ca-bc85-5b86b33e802c
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Sen. Johnson @SenRonJohnsonUS demands COVID vaccine makers hand over all documents, communications, as evidence against their products reaches a climax
The investigation heating up: Sen. Johnson’s non-compliance letter drops bombshell
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), a persistent critic of vaccine mandates and federal transparency lapses, has thrust Big Pharma and tech giants into another controversy. In a Tuesday letter, the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations chairman demanded Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and BioNTech submit records dating to January 2020, including communications with federal agencies and Big Tech platforms about vaccine safety. The move amplifies concerns that manufacturers colluded with social media companies like Meta and Alphabet to suppress reports of adverse events such as myocarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Johnson warned companies not to follow the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) playbook of hiding data. “Any attempt to obstruct or delay will result in compulsory process,” he declared, citing HHS’ 2023 refusal to unredact vaccine safety documents.
The timing couldn’t be more urgent. Last year, VAERS data showed mRNA vaccines caused 45 times more deaths than all flu vaccines combined since 1990. Yet Pfizer’s next booster — approved without new clinical trials — is already months overdue for FDA review. Meanwhile, the Biden administration sidelined ethical considerations in favor of political expediency, fast-tracking jabs through EUAs and hiding liability under the mechanism of "national emergency."
Collusion, Cover-ups, and the crisis no one wants to name
Johnson’s probe aligns with a scathing petition filed by scientists from Australia to the U.S., claiming mRNA vaccines are genetically contaminated and improperly classified to evade scrutiny. The petition, backed by immunologists and legal experts, alleges Pfizer and Moderna’s shots were laced with cancer-linked DNA plasmids—a revelation ignored by regulators until now.
“The FDA’s misclassification of mRNA jabs as vaccines, not gene therapies, allowed suppression of informed consent,” explained attorney Julian J. Gillespie. His petition cites peer-reviewed studies showing plasmid DNA in vials, blood samples, and organs — all with SV40 sequences linked to DNA mutations and tumor formation.
This contamination claim dovetails with Johnson’s focus on pharma-Big Tech collaboration. Emails obtained by The Federalist detail how HHS and social media giants like Twitter used algorithms to "fact-check" and suppress vaccine carnage reports. Even the Florida Surgeon General, Joseph Ladapo, has documented soaring myocarditis cases post-vaccine.
Jab manufacturers sought profit and power, refuse to admit to wrongdoing
Johnson’s fight isn’t just about paperwork — it’s about accountability for what many are calling “the worst vaccine safety failure in history.” During the vaccine's rollout and subsequent fallout, Johnson gave a formal platform to individuals injured by the jab, and allowed parents to tell the story of how they lost their child to the so-called vaccine.
The numbers tell a grim story: Over 2 million VAERS reports of adverse events, including thousands of deaths, and a petition signed by immunologists demanding a recall. Yet the FDA still green-lit boosters based on “existing trial data” from rushed, abbreviated studies. Johnson’s subpoena and the scientists’ petition paint a grim picture of a system that prioritizes power over people. The parallels to Soviet-era science — where dissent was silenced to prop up rulers — are haunting.
Dr. Joel Wallskog, a vaccine-injured orthopedic surgeon, summed it up: “If these companies knew the risks, they’re liable for mass harm. If they didn’t — then we’re dealing with reckless incompetence, not science.”
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Pfizer’s RSV vaccine linked to preterm births as drug giant CONCEALED RISKS from pregnant women in unethical clinical trials
"Trust the science" is the mantra repeated to pregnant women, but Pfizer's deliberate omission of preterm birth risks in RSV trials shows Big Pharma values profits over ethics.
Key findings from BMJ Open study:
• Pregnant women who received Pfizer's RSV vaccine (Abrysvo) faced higher rates of preterm births, with most occurring within a week of injection.
• GSK previously halted its identical RSV vaccine trial due to preterm birth risks—information Pfizer intentionally withheld from participants.
• FDA approved Pfizer’s shot despite internal objections, exposing women and infants to potential harm.
• Post-marketing surveillance confirms what trial data suggested: this vaccine disrupts fetal development and threatens maternal health.
The unethical concealment of preterm birth risks
For decades, pregnant women have been warned against consuming caffeine, alcohol, sushi, and even certain herbal teas—yet Pfizer injected them with an experimental biologic without disclosing known dangers. How did we get here?
When GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) discovered in 2022 that its RSV vaccine was causing preterm births—1 in 54 vaccinated mothers delivered early—it suspended trials. Pfizer, aware of this red flag, plowed ahead with its own RSV trials, never informing pregnant participants of the risk.
"Any failure to provide new and potentially important safety information to trial participants is ethically problematic," said Dr. Charles Weijer, a bioethicist who condemned Pfizer’s actions. Yet this omission wasn’t an oversight—it was policy.
Pfizer’s consent forms falsely claimed the vaccine was "risk-free for the baby," a deception experts call "misleading and irresponsible." Worse, researchers found over 80 investigators across 18 countries failed to warn pregnant women of the dangers.
VAERS found preterm ruptured membranes and hemorrhages
This study provides the first post-approval safety assessment of Pfizer's respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine in pregnant individuals using data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from September 2023 to February 2024. Among 77 reported adverse events (AEs), 54.55% were classified as serious, with preterm birth being the most prevalent pregnancy-related complication (12.8%). Other pregnancy-associated AEs included preterm rupture of membranes, cesarean sections, cervical dilation, and hemorrhages (each ?3.3%). Non-pregnancy-related side effects included headache and injection site reactions.
A disproportionality analysis identified a statistically significant signal for preterm birth, suggesting it was reported more frequently than expected. Most preterm births occurred between 32 and 37 weeks of gestation, with a median onset of three days post-vaccination (two-thirds occurring within a week). While the safety profile generally matched prelicensure trial findings, the study underscores the need for further investigation into the observed preterm birth signal. The authors recommend active surveillance to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes, emphasizing the importance of robust post-marketing monitoring to inform clinical guidelines on RSV vaccination during pregnancy.
Science confirms what Pfizer denied: RSV shots trigger early labor
The new peer-reviewed analysis in BMJ Open examined VAERS reports and found:
• Most preterm births occurred within 3 days of vaccination.
• No co-administration with other vaccines (ruling out confounding factors).
• Statistical safety signals strongly linked the shot to premature rupture of membranes and preterm labor.
The FDA ignored these risks, approving Abrysvo in 2023 despite 4 advisory members voting "no." Their compromise? A narrow 32-36 week window for vaccination—a flimsy attempt to dodge liability for the most dangerous preterm births (before 32 weeks).
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Suppressed report reveals U.S. troops had COVID-19 symptoms in Wuhan months before pandemic began
In a significant development that has reignited debates over the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, a suppressed military report has confirmed that seven U.S. service members exhibited COVID-19-like symptoms during the 2019 World Military Games in Wuhan, China, months before the official start of the pandemic. The report, which the Biden administration withheld from public release for over two years, was finally made public in March 2025, raising questions about the transparency and timing of the information.
The suppressed report and its contents
The two-page military report, finalized in December 2022, detailed that seven American military personnel experienced symptoms consistent with COVID-19 during or shortly after the October 2019 World Military Games in Wuhan. These findings directly contradict earlier statements by the Biden administration, which, through Defense Department spokesman John Kirby, had claimed in 2021 that no such illnesses had occurred.
The report was quietly transmitted to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees in 2022, as required by the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act. However, it did not appear on a government website until late March 2025, when the Trump administration uploaded it to a Defense Department database. The Pentagon has not disclosed when it first became aware of the soldiers' illnesses and declined to comment on the report's contents.
Historical context and implications
The 2019 World Military Games, often referred to as the "military Olympics," brought together nearly 10,000 athletes from over 100 countries to Wuhan, a city that would later become the epicenter of the global pandemic. The presence of multiple athletes from various countries reporting similar symptoms has intensified scrutiny of the timeline and origin of the virus's initial spread.
Chinese officials have long maintained that the first patient with COVID-19 became sick on December 1, 2019. However, credible sources and anecdotal evidence suggest a much earlier exposure, particularly during the October 2019 World Military Games. For instance, athletes from Germany, France, Italy and Luxembourg reported falling ill with symptoms consistent with COVID-19, and some described Wuhan as a "ghost town" with empty streets and heightened health precautions.
Expert reactions and congressional demands
Rutgers University professor Richard Ebright, a vocal advocate for the lab-leak theory, stated that the withheld report strengthens existing evidence that COVID-19 was circulating in Wuhan in October-November 2019. "This new information strengthens U.S. and allied intelligence data indicating that COVID-19 was circulating in Wuhan in October-November 2019," Ebright told the Washington Free Beacon. He criticized the Biden administration and Congress for keeping the report from the public, calling it "an outrage."
Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) also condemned the concealment, stating, "Taxpayers deserve to know the truth about COVID-19 origins, but the Biden administration concealed this information from the American people for years."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Hospital homicide? Medical records show Texas girl died from a hospital-acquired pneumonia superbug — NOT measles
In a recent development that has sparked intense debate, the death of 8-year-old Daisy Hildebrand in West Texas has brought the issue of measles and its treatment into the spotlight. The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) initially reported that Daisy died from "measles pulmonary failure." However, a detailed analysis of her medical records by leading medical experts suggests that her death was more likely due to hospital-acquired pneumonia, a condition that was exacerbated by a series of medical errors.
The case of Daisy Hildebrand
Daisy Hildebrand was admitted to University Medical Center (UMC) Children’s Hospital in Lubbock, Texas, on March 21, with community-acquired pneumonia, a urinary tract infection and dehydration. She tested positive for measles on March 24 and was treated with antibiotics and oxygen. After showing signs of improvement, she was discharged on March 24. However, her condition deteriorated, and she was readmitted to UMC on March 27 with a high fever, cough and shortness of breath.
Dr. Pierre Kory, a pulmonologist and critical care specialist, reviewed Daisy’s medical records and concluded that her death was due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to hospital-acquired pneumonia. Kory noted that the causative organism was a highly antibiotic-resistant E. coli, which she likely contracted during her first ICU stay.
Medical errors and treatment failures
Kory highlighted several critical errors in Daisy’s treatment that may have contributed to her death:
1 Lack of antibiotics: Despite her worsening condition, antibiotics were stopped early in her second hospital stay. Kory stated, "The admitting doctor’s diagnosis was ‘pneumonitis,’ and antibiotics were quickly stopped after admission."
2 High-dose steroids without anti-infectives: The hospital staff administered high-dose steroids without pairing them with appropriate anti-infectives, which Kory described as a "lousy idea."
3 Delayed sputum culture: A sputum culture, which could have identified the specific bacteria causing her pneumonia, was not performed until days into her second stay. By the time the results came back, it was too late to change her treatment effectively.
4 Incorrect antibiotic choice: On day seven of her second stay, the hospital staff broadened the antibiotic treatment to include ceftazidime. However, the E. coli causing her pneumonia was resistant to this antibiotic. Kory noted that the correct antibiotic, imipenem, was not administered.
Historical context and public health implications
The case of Daisy Hildebrand raises important questions about the treatment of measles and the broader implications for public health. Measles, once a common childhood illness, has been largely controlled in the U.S. through vaccination. However, the effectiveness and safety of the measles vaccine have been subjects of ongoing debate.
Measles mortality rates:
• Pre-vaccine era: Measles mortality rates had already declined significantly by the time the first measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. According to the CDC, the death rate from measles dropped by 98% from 1900 to 1955, largely due to improved sanitation and nutrition.
• Post-vaccine era: While the measles vaccine has further reduced the number of reported cases, concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy persist. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has recorded 144 deaths following MMR or MMRV vaccination between 2000 and 2024, compared to nine measles-related deaths reported to the CDC during the same period.
Vaccine safety and efficacy:
• Waning immunity: Research shows that immunity from the measles vaccine wanes over time, with about 60% of vaccinated children susceptible to subclinical measles infection and 33% of adults susceptible to clinical infection by age 24-26.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
The media playbook for measles looks a lot like its COVID playbook — this time, kids are the pawns
There are moments in the history of a movement that test its resolve. For the medical freedom movement, this is one of those moments.
We are in the midst of another full-on attack by the pharmaceutical-industrial complex, aided and abetted by a beholden mainstream media united around its allegiance to a $69 billion vaccine industry.
Five years ago, we fought back as our government, Big Media and Big Pharma orchestrated and executed a COVID-19 fear campaign — a campaign built on lies, deception and censorship — and then parlayed the public’s fear into dangerous and deadly medical mandates and hospital protocols that continue to cause profound harm.
The upside to COVID-19 global disaster?
It opened the eyes of millions more people to the dangers of shoddily tested vaccines, regulatory agency hubris and one-size-fits-all “medicine.”
As our movement has grown exponentially, so has our threat to Big Pharma.
In response, we’re seeing the same tactics rolled out again. This time, it’s measles. This time, children are the pawns in pharma’s playbook.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) stood strong and stayed true to our mission during COVID. We’re standing just as strong now. We remain just as committed now to the truth, informed consent and medical freedom as we were during the pandemic.
As pharma ramps up its measles playbook, our No. 1 job is to dismantle the vaccine industry’s lies — broadcast far and wide through the industry’s most reliable and faithful megaphone: mainstream media.
The media would have you believe that measles is a “deadly” disease. But any suggestion that MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccines are safer than measles infection isn’t supported by facts.
In fact, between 2000 and 2024, nine measles-related deaths were reported to the CDC. During the same period, 141 deaths following MMR or MMRV vaccination were reported in the U.S. to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — suggesting the MMR vaccine can be deadlier than measles.
The media echo the same familiar refrain: The MMR vaccine is “overwhelmingly safe.”
In fact, the MMR vaccine is associated with serious health risks. The package insert for Merck’s MMRII says, “M-M-R II vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.”
Research also shows the MMR vaccine causes febrile seizures, anaphylaxis, meningitis, encephalitis, thrombocytopenia, arthralgia and vasculitis. In 2004, researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that boys vaccinated with their first MMR vaccine on time were 67% more likely to be diagnosed with autism compared to boys who got their first vaccine after their 3rd birthday.
The media insist there’s no viable treatment for measles — hence prevention, with the MMR vaccine, is the sole solution.
In fact, as CHD reported, doctors in West Texas are successfully treating measles with budesonide and vitamin A. Even the World Health Organization recommends vitamin A.
Yet some hospitals and doctors are refusing to treat measles patients with budesonide. Texas health officials rejected pleas by a treating physician to endorse the treatment and get the word out to hospitals about its effectiveness.
Sound familiar?
We saw this identical playbook with COVID. Media parroted public health officials’ claim that the vaccine alone would save us — while discouraging, ridiculing and even outright sanctioning the use of ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, budesonide and other treatments known to reduce COVID severity and death.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
CIA Official Terry Adirim TERMINATED for her role in pushing unlawful vaccine mandates on the military
The legal battle against unlawful orders
In a significant legal victory for military personnel who were subjugated by unlawful vaccine mandates, a federal judge has blocked the Pentagon from punishing unvaccinated Navy SEALs and other Special Forces members, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle against coercive vaccine mandates. This decision not only highlights the ethical and legal complexities surrounding such mandates but also underscores the importance of protecting individual freedoms and constitutional rights, especially within the military, an institution that prides itself on defending those very principles. One of the key architects behind the unlawful vaccine mandate - CIA Official Terry Adirim - has also been TERMINATED for her role in the scandal.
The court's ruling is a testament to the resilience of service members who stood firm in their beliefs and the legal system's capacity to correct overreach. The mandate, which was implemented by then-Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and fully supported by the Biden administration, forced service members to choose between receiving a vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) or facing dismissal. This mandate was not only ethically questionable but also legally dubious, as it bypassed the necessary presidential waiver required under 10 U.S.C. Section 1107(a).
Terry Adirim, a key figure in the enforcement of the mandate, issued a memo in September 2021 directing Department of Defense healthcare providers to treat the EUA Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine as interchangeable with the FDA-approved Comirnaty version. This directive was met with skepticism and legal challenges, as it appeared to circumvent the legal requirements and potentially violate the rights of service members. Adirim's memo was considered legally dubious even within the Pentagon, and her recent firing from the CIA is a clear indication that her actions are being scrutinized and held accountable.
The human cost of coercive mandates
The impact of these mandates on the military community has been profound. Over 8,700 service members were forced out of the military, and tens of thousands more are estimated to have left under duress, harassment, and discrimination. Others stayed in their positions quietly, not conceding, but facing retaliatory measures every step of the way. These numbers are not just statistics; they represent the lives and careers of dedicated individuals who were willing to serve their country but were unwilling to compromise their health or personal beliefs. The loss of these skilled and courageous service members has weakened the military's operational readiness and morale.
The Trump administration's efforts to reverse the damage caused by the Biden administration's mandate are a step in the right direction. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to reinstate service members who were kicked out, along with backpay and their same rank. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth followed up with a directive to the services to implement the executive order, and the Pentagon has begun outreach to those affected. This move is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic necessity to rebuild the military's strength and cohesion.
The broader implications for individual liberty
The legal and ethical issues surrounding the vaccine mandates extend beyond the military. They raise fundamental questions about the balance between public health and individual liberty, the role of government in personal medical decisions, and the accountability of public officials. The firing of Terry Adirim and the court's decision to block the Pentagon's punitive actions are important steps toward restoring trust in institutions and protecting the rights of individuals.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
DEADLY FLU JAB WARNING: New flu vaccines make recipients 27 PERCENT MORE LIKELY to catch the flu
1 Negative Vaccine Effectiveness: The 2024-2025 flu vaccine showed a -26.9% effectiveness rate, meaning vaccinated individuals had a 27% higher risk of contracting the flu compared to unvaccinated individuals. This suggests the vaccine may have impaired immunity rather than provided protection.
2 Repeated Vaccination Risks: The study builds on prior research showing that annual flu vaccination may reduce effectiveness over time, with some past studies reporting negative efficacy (up to -54%) in multi-year recipients. Immune system interference and strain mismatches were cited as potential causes.
3 Concerns Over Ingredients and Safety: Most participants received vaccines containing thimerosal (a mercury-based preservative linked to neurodevelopmental risks), which researchers speculated might weaken immune responses. Prior studies also associated flu vaccines with Guillain-Barré syndrome and non-flu respiratory infections.
4 Challenge to Public Health Policies: Experts argue the findings contradict mainstream vaccine advocacy, highlighting flaws in mandates, lack of pre-release efficacy testing, and the impracticality of annual reformulations. The study calls for a reevaluation of blanket flu vaccination campaigns, especially given low mortality benefits (particularly in the elderly) and potential net harm.
This is deeply concerning folks. This year’s flu shots literally cause the jabbed sheeple to have a 27 percent higher risk of catching the flu. What kind of warped ‘medicine’ is this? The flu can be deadly, especially for people already suffering from cancer, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, lung disease, high blood pressure, and clot shot syndrome from the spike proteins of the Covid stabs.
A new preprint study of over 53,000 Cleveland Clinic employees suggests that the 2024-2025 influenza vaccine may have increased recipients' risk of contracting the flu by 27%, contradicting long-standing public health recommendations. Published last week on MedRxiv, the research found a negative vaccine effectiveness rate of 26.9%, sparking debate among scientists and medical professionals. Conducted during a season marked by high flu transmission, the study challenges the effectiveness of annual vaccination campaigns—particularly when strain mismatches occur.
The study tracked vaccinated and unvaccinated employees from October 2023 to February 2024, revealing that flu infections rose more rapidly among those who received the shot. “The vaccine has not been effective in preventing influenza this season,” the authors concluded. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher called the findings “deeply concerning,” while Dr. Clayton J. Baker stated the data “strongly suggests the shot was outright harmful.”
Internist Dr. Meryl Nass noted that flu vaccines are not rigorously tested for efficacy before approval, as they rely on historical licensing. “Negative efficacy is possible,” she said, citing minimal pre-release safety evaluations.
Massive contradictions are evident from the Medical Industrial Complex, the Vaccine Industrial Complex, and the Mass Media push for everyone to get flu jabs
Despite the Cleveland Clinic’s vaccine mandate for employees, the unvaccinated cohort—comprising those with medical or religious exemptions—showed lower infection rates. Karl Jablonowski of Children’s Health Defense argued the results expose flaws in mandates: “Those exempt posed less of a threat [to patients] than those who were mandated.”
The study echoes prior research, including a 2012 Clinical Infectious Diseases paper linking flu vaccines to higher rates of non-flu respiratory infections. James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., called the new analysis “one of the most consequential influenza vaccine studies in recent years” due to its scale and independence from industry funding.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
California FAILS federal program audit: More than half of COVID unemployment benefits are in question
California's state government has been found to be in noncompliance with the requirements of seven out of 22 federal programs, according to a recent audit by the state auditor. The audit, which highlights "pervasive" noncompliance in the unemployment benefits program, raises significant concerns about the state's ability to manage federal funds and could jeopardize essential federal funding.
Audit reveals widespread noncompliance
The audit, conducted by Deputy State Auditor Linus Li, concluded that California did not materially comply with the requirements for seven federal programs, including one where noncompliance was pervasive. The report states, "This report concludes that the State did not materially comply with certain requirements for seven of the 22 federal programs or clusters of programs (federal programs) MGO audited, including one program for which the noncompliance was pervasive."
The audit also noted that while the state complied with the remaining federal programs, it continues to experience deficiencies in its accounting and administrative practices, affecting its internal controls over compliance with federal requirements.
Unemployment benefits program under scrutiny
One of the most critical findings of the audit pertains to the state's unemployment benefits program. The report found that even in 2023, years after the state made 55 billion in fraudulent COVID lockdown?era benefits payments, the state likely made "potentially ineligible payments" of nearly 200 million. Of the 138 pandemic unemployment assistance claimants tested, 91, or 66%, had verification issues.
California State Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher criticized the administration, stating, "While Gavin Newsom chases the national spotlight, Californians are left with an administration that can’t accomplish the basic functions of government. The federal government is right to take a look at this spending and decide if it’s appropriate to keep throwing resources at an administration that treats it like Monopoly money."
Structural deficit and payroll tax hikes
The audit's findings are particularly concerning given the state's ongoing structural deficit in its unemployment fund. According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO), the state's unemployment fund runs a structural deficit of $2 billion per year, in addition to a $20 billion debt and $1 billion in annual interest payments to the federal government.
To address this deficit, the LAO has recommended a significant increase in payroll taxes. Currently, businesses pay 42 per employee making 46,800 or more per year. However, the LAO suggests that this amount would need to rise to $889.20, or over 21 times higher than the existing base payroll tax, to cover the state's insolvency.
Historical context and future implications
The audit's findings are not just a reflection of current administrative failures but also highlight a long-standing issue with California's management of federal funds. The state's unemployment benefits program has been a source of controversy since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with widespread reports of fraud and mismanagement.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
New study links mRNA vaccines to GENETIC CHANGES – and not the good kind
A groundbreaking peer-reviewed study has ignited a fierce debate over the long-term safety of mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines.
In a paper published in Molecular Systems Biology late last month, a team of 19 German scientists suggested that these vaccines may induce lasting genetic alterations that could potentially lead to cancer and autoimmune disorders.
According to the study, mRNA vaccines can alter the structure of histones – proteins that play a crucial role in organizing DNA within cells. Histones act like spools around which DNA is wound, and their modification can significantly affect gene expression.
The researchers identified a specific change known as "histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation" (H3K27ac), which was found to persist for several months after vaccination. This alteration is associated with the activation of genes that can promote inflammation and has been linked to various types of cancer, including leukemia and brain tumors.
According to journalist Alex Berenson, the study shows that "mRNA vaccines can modify human chromosomes in ways that are connected to the development of leukemia and brain tumors." This occurs because the vaccines "train" immune cells to maintain a pro-inflammatory state, which can lead to chronic inflammation and, potentially, the onset of disease.
Epigenetics, the study of changes in gene expression that do not involve alterations to the DNA sequence itself, is at the heart of this discussion. The mRNA vaccines induce epigenetic changes by causing chemical modifications to histone proteins. These changes can activate genes in ways that promote tumor growth and inflammation.
The researchers also found that the genetic alterations were not limited to the site of injection but were observed in monocytes, a type of white blood cell that circulates throughout the body. This suggests that the vaccines' effects may be systemic, potentially impacting multiple organ systems.
Parallels with other studies
The findings of this German study align with those of other recent research. A Chinese study published earlier this year highlighted the potential of H3K27ac as a therapeutic target in cancer, while a Polish study linked H3K27ac alterations to leukemia and brain tumors. These studies collectively underscore the need for a deeper understanding of the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines.
The study has prompted renewed calls for the suspension or withdrawal of mRNA vaccines. A petition filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration earlier this year by a group of scientists argues that the vaccines are unapproved gene therapies and contain potentially harmful levels of DNA plasmids. The petition cites evidence from multiple studies, including the German paper, to support its claims.
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently announced the creation of a new sub-agency within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention dedicated to addressing vaccine injuries. This move reflects growing concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and the need for more comprehensive monitoring and research.
The emergence of post-vaccination syndrome (PVS), a condition characterized by chronic symptoms such as fatigue, brain fog and dizziness, has raised additional questions about the vaccines' safety.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Though the earth’s temperature is the lowest it’s been for 485 million years, the Vaccine Industrial Complex says the science is settled about global warming, so go to the nearest Walmart and get your Climate Change Prevention Jab to save the world from bursting into flames next week. It’s your civic duty. Follow the science, folks, and it leads you straight to an early grave, while the doctors all profit heavily from putting the climate emergency ahead of your medical needs.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
New Zealand approves risky weight-loss drug Wegovy despite alarming health risks abroad
In a move that has drawn sharp criticism from health experts, New Zealand’s government has approved the weight-loss drug Wegovy despite mounting evidence linking it to severe side effects, including pancreatitis, kidney disease, and even blindness. Associate Health Minister David Seymour has enthusiastically branded the drug a “game changer,” ignoring warnings from international studies and rising hospitalizations overseas. The decision raises serious questions about whether corporate interests are trumping public safety in New Zealand’s healthcare policies.
A dangerous trend in medical oversight
The approval comes as the government pushes the controversial Gene Technology Bill, which would fast-track the approval of drugs cleared in just two overseas jurisdictions. Critics warn this will strip away vital safeguards, leaving New Zealanders vulnerable to poorly tested medications. Meanwhile, obesity rates — fueled by processed foods and poor dietary habits — continue to climb. Instead of addressing root causes through nutrition, exercise, and traditional health practices, officials are betting on risky pharmaceutical solutions that could do more harm than good.
New Zealand’s approval of Wegovy flies in the face of alarming research. A 2025 Washington University study published in Nature Medicine examined 215,000 users of weight-loss injectables like Wegovy, Ozempic, and Mounjaro. The findings were damning: patients faced double the risk of pancreatitis, an 11% higher likelihood of arthritis, and increased threats of kidney disease and dangerously low blood pressure.
Worse yet, a JAMA Ophthalmology study linked these drugs to vision loss and blindness, with patients reporting irreversible damage. In the UK, hospitalizations tied to weight-loss drug complications surged by 46% in just one month, per the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
Yet, when questioned by the NZ Herald, David Seymour dismissed these concerns, calling Wegovy’s approval “very exciting” and claiming it will “save our health system money” by preventing hospital visits—a claim directly contradicted by real-world data.
The Gene Technology Bill: A corporate handout disguised as reform
Seymour’s push for automatic drug approvals under the Gene Technology Bill only deepens the recklessness. If passed, medications cleared in just two overseas markets would bypass rigorous local scrutiny — effectively outsourcing New Zealand’s safety standards to foreign regulators with possible conflicts of interest.
The bill also fails to regulate genetically modified foods, leaving consumers in the dark about what they eat despite studies linking industrial food production to rising obesity since 2000.
The real solutions being ignored
While Seymour touts Wegovy as a miracle fix, experts argue that obesity requires holistic solutions, not just chemical interventions. Processed foods, sedentary lifestyles, and corporate agriculture policies have created a public health crisis, yet the government refuses to tackle these issues head-on.
Natural approaches such as better nutrition, exercise, and community-based wellness programs are being sidelined in favor of Big Pharma’s latest profit driver.
New Zealanders deserve a healthcare system that prioritizes safety, transparency, and real solutions — not reckless deregulation and unchecked corporate influence. The approval of Wegovy and the looming Gene Technology Bill represent a dangerous shift toward profit-driven policymaking, with little regard for long-term consequences.
Instead of gambling with citizens’ health, the government should invest in preventative care, clean eating initiatives, and policies that empower its people rather than endangering them. Until then, Seymour’s so-called “game changer” may prove to be just another losing bet for New Zealand.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Thimerosal is 50 percent MERCURY and NO it has NOT been removed from vaccines – that was a BIG FAT LIE the CDC told vax skeptics to keep them vaxxed up and dying
1 Decades of Misinformation: The U.S. government and health agencies (CDC, FDA, AAP) falsely claimed thimerosal—a mercury-based vaccine preservative—was removed from childhood vaccines, despite evidence showing it remains in some (e.g., flu shots, tetanus vaccines).
2 Hidden Research & Suppressed Science: Internal documents (e.g., 2000 Simpsonwood meeting transcripts) reveal officials acknowledged thimerosal’s neurotoxic risks and possible links to autism but actively suppressed findings and manipulated study language to downplay dangers.
3 Scientific Manipulation: The CDC and industry-funded studies obscured early research (e.g., Verstraeten’s 1999/2004 data, IOM’s 2001 report) that found thimerosal exposure correlated with developmental disorders, later dismissing further research via a 2004 IOM reversal.
4 Ongoing Use & Deceptive Labeling: Despite public assurances, thimerosal persists in vaccines, often concealed by misleading “thimerosal-free” labels for trace amounts. A 2023 review cited 165+ studies confirming its harms, contradicting official narratives.
First off, mercury in any amount is highly toxic to humans, whether consumed, breathed in, or injected. It doesn’t matter if it’s ethyl mercury or methyl mercury, so don’t fall for that misinformation either. When natural health advocates began blowing the whistle on the dangers of mercury in vaccines, the CDC had to run cover, so they renamed it “thimerosal,” which is made up of 50 percent mercury. Then they lied to Americans who had become concerned with the dangers of injecting mercury into their body and said that NO MORE vaccines contain mercury. It was a lie, but most vaxxers are too dumbed-down to Google “thimerosal” and find out.
This has gone on for twenty years. Mercury is still in the multi-dose flu shots, TDaP, tetanus shots, and several other injections, and at VERY HIGH DOSES. In fact, most influenza vaccines contain 25,000 times the amount of mercury that the EPA warns about in tap water and fish. Oops. Yes, the Health Ranger ran lab tests on those and blew the whistle. Remember?
Mercury in vaccines is deadly and Pharma has known it forever, that’s why they’re called dirty jabs
Mercury is used as a preservative in the multi-dose flu shots because it saves pharma money and makes children sick, including causing autism, which is one of the biggest cash cows of the sick care industrial complex. Since the flu shot needle goes in and out of the same vial of deadly live virus concoction, something has to be used to kill the germs and preserve the virus so it can infect children. That’s mercury, or wait, “thimerosal.”
Yes, in fact, the CDC website states: “Fact: Thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in the United States in 2001.” Can you sue them for false information and mass killing? No. You can’t. The FDA’s “Modernization Act” from 1997 dictated that mercury must be removed from vaccines, but that was a lie also.
Got mercury poisoning? Got autism? Got Mad Hatter Syndrome? Check those vaccine ingredients for Thimerosal, if you can still read without getting a migraine headache and having a nervous breakdown.
CHOP, also known as the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, is home to the guy who invented the Rotavirus jab that contains a deadly wild pig virus that causes a child’s intestines to become entangled. The CHOP website also claims thimerosal was removed from vaccines, but it never was. Just call Paul Offit and ask him. He made millions of dollars helping design vaccines that make kids deathly sick for profit.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
HHS announces new CDC sub-agency focused on vaccine injuries
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is establishing a new sub-agency under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) dedicated to researching and addressing vaccine-related injuries.
In an interview on NewsNation with Chris Cuomo on March 27, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. revealed that the new agency will prioritize investigating adverse effects linked to vaccinations, as well as conditions such as long COVID and Lyme disease.
"That's going to be one of our priority focuses," Kennedy said. "We already have a division at [the National Institutes of Health] that is devoted to studying long COVID and to figuring out cures… and we're incorporating an agency within CDC that is going to specialize in vaccine injuries."
Kennedy emphasized the growing need for transparency and rigorous scientific review to ensure public trust in medical interventions.
"These are priorities for the American people. More and more people are suffering from these injuries, and we are committed to having gold-standard science to make sure that we can figure out what the treatments are and that we can deliver the best treatments possible to the American people," he added.
The new unit will work alongside his proposed vaccine adverse event reporting system, which he claims will be "more accurate" than the existing Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
New HHS vaccine safety sub-agency praised by advocates, scientists
Medical researchers, advocates and critics of federal vaccine policy hail the new HHS vaccine safety sub-agency as a critical, if overdue, step toward accountability.
Among them is Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for Children's Health Defense, who called the move "excellent" but lamented systemic failures in data transparency. James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., a research scientist and author, described the announcement as a "historic and long-overdue shift in public health accountability."
"For decades, families of the vaccine-injured have been subjected to silence, stonewalling and denial by the very institutions tasked with ensuring safety," Lyons-Weiler said. "This new development is without question a step in the right direction."
Christina Parks, Ph.D., a biologist who has studied vaccine injuries, said the sub-agency "will legitimize the suffering of millions of Americans and people around the world who have endured the agonizing effects of vaccine injury."
Ben Tapper, a Nebraska chiropractor who was labeled part of the "Disinformation Dozen" by the Center for Countering Digital Hate for his criticism of COVID-19 vaccines, called the news "a long-overdue crack in the dam."
"For decades, we've been shouting on the rooftops, parents, researchers and victims alike, about the real harm these shots can cause, only to be dismissed as conspiracy nuts or told the science is 'settled.' The data's been there: VAERS reports, court payouts from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and countless studies buried or ignored by the mainstream. Now, they can't pretend it's not happening anymore."
Meanwhile, Sayer Ji, co-founder of Stand for Health Freedom, framed the move as an implicit admission of failure.
"That HHS departments were selling patient data and operating in silos reveals a cartel, not a public health institution. This is not reform, it's rupture. And it opens the door to a new era of truth, accountability and bodily sovereignty."
Watch this video about RFK Jr. promising to address the existential threat of chronic disease.
https://www.brighteon.com/8f3a0ef8-cccf-46f9-9da4-ba710ceb329e
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
CLOT SHOT PLANDEMIC UNFOLDING: Fibrous, rubbery clots caused by covid injections have prion-like seeding activity
According to the CDC, every vaccine ever created is always exactly 95 percent “safe and effective,” give or take one to two percent. That’s the narrative, even when they run ZERO clinical trials on humans, they still spew out the same, tired lie. Got mRNA clot shot syndrome? That’s because mRNA is 95 percent effective at wrecking human health, including by creating rubbery vascular clots when the amyloid protein prions join together inside the blood. Follow the scientific bouncing ball.
Throughout the past year, embalmers around the world are finding fibrous, rubbery clots in at least a fourth of the autopsies of Covid-injected humans
Oh the mystery. Embalmers just can’t seem to figure out what these long, crazy-looking, rubbery clots are that entirely clog human arteries and veins are. Where on earth could they be coming from? No embalmers ever found them before the pandemic (clot shots) started, so could it be the flu? Of course, if anyone blames the mRNA injections, they might end up suicided (two bullets to the back of the head labeled as “suicide”) by the Vaccine Industrial Complex of insidious genocidal maniacs.
It must be Covid, right? Side effects of the flu include fever, chills, achy muscles, nagging cough, and wait for it… wait for it… long rubbery vascular clots that look like a surgeon inserted an extension cord into a human artery and left it there for the patient to die. Scientists and embalmers are studying these extension-cord looking rubbery clots and finding amyloid proteins in them that are caused by “phosphorylation” induced by mRNA spike PRION proteins clotting together. Yes, that’s what’s happening, folks.
The fibrous clots test positive for prion-like seeding activity, meaning the covid injections result in prion clots that form in the blood vessels, 1,000 times worse than a tiny blood clot that could already be deadly enough to cause a stroke, heart attack or brain aneurism. The discoveries include a subset of amyloid proteins called “prions” which cause neurovascular or neurodegenerative disorders, including Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (“CKD”), Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s-like dementia.
All three ICP-MS analyses conducted revealed the white fibrous clots contain extremely high amounts of phosphorus, sulphur and sometimes tin. For example, the concentration of phosphorus in normal blood is between 100 and 1,000ppm, yet in the white fibrous clot samples, phosphorus was measured at 5,000ppm. These abnormally high amount of phosphorus in the white fibrous clots are largely responsible for why the clots are forming. Think Bill Depop Gates, Wicked Walenski and Freakshow Fauci know this? Of course they do.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Trump administration SUSPENDS federal grants to Princeton University amid antisemitism probe
The Trump administration has suspended dozens of federal research grants to Princeton University in New Jersey, escalating its crackdown on Ivy League institutions under investigation for alleged antisemitism.
Princeton President Christopher Eisgruber confirmed the freeze, revealing that agencies including the Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Department of Defense halted funding for multiple research projects. While the administration has not provided detailed reasoning, the move aligns with a broader federal campaign targeting elite universities over campus discrimination complaints.
Princeton now joins Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University in facing federal funding suspensions tied to antisemitism investigations. Eisgruber pledged cooperation with government inquiries but vowed to defend academic freedom.
"We are committed to fighting antisemitism and all forms of discrimination, and we will cooperate with the government in combating antisemitism," he wrote in a campus-wide email sent Tuesday, April 1. "Princeton will also vigorously defend academic freedom and the due process rights of this university."
The suspensions follow a March warning from the Department of Education to 60 universities, threatening enforcement actions if they failed to address alleged anti-Jewish bias. Princeton had already been under federal investigation since April 2024.
The probe was initiated after Zachary Marschall, editor-in-chief of Campus Reform, filed a complaint citing a pro-Palestinian protest at Princeton where chants such as "Intifada" were heard. Marschall accused the university of ignoring what he called antisemitic rhetoric.
From protests to punishment: The high-stakes battle over campus speech
The second Trump administration's aggressive stance reflects President Donald Trump's repeated vows to combat campus antisemitism, which he has linked to pro-Palestinian activism. Federal officials have characterized some student demonstrators as "pro-Hamas," while activists insist their protests target Israeli military actions, not Jewish people. The administration has also deported foreign students tied to protests and intensified scrutiny of Middle East studies programs.
Princeton, with a $34 billion endowment, received $456 million in federal grants last year – making the suspensions a significant financial blow. The Anti-Defamation League previously gave the university an "F" grade for its handling of antisemitism.
Meanwhile, Columbia recently agreed to federal demands – including revising disciplinary policies and its Middle East curriculum – to restore $400 million in frozen funds. Over in Massachusetts, Harvard now faces an audit of $8.7 billion in grants by a federal antisemitism task force.
Eisgruber, a vocal critic of the administration's tactics, previously condemned the Columbia sanctions as a "radical threat to scholarly excellence" in an essay published last month in The Atlantic magazine. He likened the current climate to the Red Scare of the 1950s, warning of eroding academic freedoms.
The administration is leveraging Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which bars federal funding to institutions that enable discrimination based on religion or national origin. While Princeton has not been formally accused of violating the law, the suspensions signal a hardline approach that could reshape campus speech policies nationwide.
Watch this clip about colleges facing backlash and potentially losing funding over allegations of antisemitism on campus.
https://www.brighteon.com/a3599a90-d301-4398-83a9-e6e0d774f863
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia