16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
In response to these findings, researchers developed a searchable database to help the public check whether their medications were approved based on robust science. The database assigns color-coded ratings — green for drugs meeting all four standards, yellow for those missing one, and red for drugs failing two or more.
To protect their health, experts urge patients to ask critical questions before starting new medications, review drug approval histories, wait for post-market data when possible, avoid unnecessary prescriptions, and work with healthcare providers who question pharmaceutical protocols.
Ultimately, this investigation exposes a broken FDA approval system that prioritizes speed and industry interests over patient safety and scientific integrity — and calls for urgent reforms to restore public trust in one of the nation’s most powerful regulatory agencies.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The cover-up continues
Why has Statistics South Africa withheld death records past 2021? Why does SAMRC sidestep linking injections to mortality? The answer is simple: confirmation would collapse the narrative. Authorities intentionally ignore causation, dismissing mounting evidence as “coincidental.” Where’s the autopsy surge? The toxicology investigations?
Meanwhile, vaccine-injured citizens are abandoned, denied justice, and mocked by media. Independent researchers (like Super Sally) piece together the suppressed data, battling censorship every step. But silence is complicity.
The world was never suffering a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” It suffered a pandemic of medical fraud. The evidence—buried but not erased—proves vaccine-linked fatalities were inevitable. Governments knew. Corporations profited. And we, the people, were caught in a fight for the truth, while some sacrificed their bodies at the altar of this depopulation scheme. The question now isn’t whether these injections killed millions—the statistics shout it. The question is: Who pays for the genocide?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA updates mRNA vaccine warnings, confirming “extremely high” myocarditis risk in young men
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken an unprecedented step by updating safety labels for Pfizer and Moderna's mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines. The updated labels now explicitly warn of an "extremely high" risk of myocarditis – a potentially life-altering heart condition – in young men.
The decision announced July 1 follows mounting evidence of persistent cardiac damage in males aged 12 to 24, contradicting earlier federal assurances that such cases were "rare and mild." This move marks a pivotal moment in the national debate over vaccine transparency and the long-term consequences of rushed pandemic policies.
The FDA's label update is the latest step by officials working under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to restrict or undercut the use of vaccines. Under the leadership of Commissioner Marty Makary, the regulator restricted annual COVID-19 shots to seniors and other Americans at higher risk from the virus.
The updated warnings stem from alarming cardiac MRI findings in young men who developed myocarditis after vaccination. Studies funded by the agency reveal that 60 percent of affected patients still exhibited signs of myocardial injury – in particular late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) – five months after their initial diagnosis. LGE indicates scarring or inflammation that could lead to permanent heart damage, raising concerns about long-term cardiovascular health in this demographic.
The revised incidence rate of 27 myocarditis cases per million young men is now officially acknowledged, though critics argue this figure is likely underreported due to passive surveillance systems and historical reluctance to link adverse events to vaccination.
Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the tissue that surrounds the heart) are driven by an immune system on high alert, set off by inflammatory proteins, research found in 2023. Myocarditis causes fatigue and shortness of breath, while pericarditis leads to chest pain.
Kennedy is pushing for stricter limitations on booster recommendations
The FDA's label update is unlikely to quell the controversy. Vaccine skeptics, including Kennedy himself, are pushing for stricter limitations on booster recommendations. Meanwhile, mainstream public health figures warn that overemphasizing rare side effects could deter vaccination altogether.
For years, federal health agencies downplayed myocarditis risks, emphasizing that the benefits of mRNA vaccines outweighed potential harms. But the FDA's latest action directly contradicts those earlier claims.
The regulator now mandates that manufacturers disclose unadjusted incidence rates and MRI-confirmed injuries in their prescribing information. The updated fact sheets now extend to emergency-use vaccines for children as young as six months, signaling a broader acknowledgment of risk.
This reversal comes amid intensifying scrutiny over whether officials suppressed safety concerns to maintain public compliance with vaccination campaigns. The FDA's presentation, publicly available online, underscores a stark departure from past messaging – one that finally prioritizes data over dogma.
The FDA's revised warnings represent a watershed moment in the pandemic's legacy. For young men and their families, the updated labels offer a belated but necessary caution.
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree reporting about vaccine-induced cardiac inflammation occurring 3,000 times the normal rate in this video.
https://www.brighteon.com/3da7e753-75e1-4995-a12f-6fa691735c65
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
4. Mullein Cough Drops
Combined with wild cherry bark or honey, mullein cough drops offer rapid relief for sore throats and chest congestion—free from toxic artificial sweeteners.
For those seeking real health sovereignty, mullein is a revolutionary plant. It clears the lungs without poisoning the body, offering what modern medicine refuses to provide: true healing. Mullein should have been recommended as a first line treatment to support the sinuses and lungs during the COVID-19 hysteria.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
But why buy farmland? Gates has been silent on his large acquisitions—but experts suspect dark motives:
• Jessica Rose, Ph.D.: "This is about controlling food and water, tagging humans like livestock."
• Latypova: He wants private control over land, universities, and governments for biotech domination.
• North Dakota residents warn these deals decimate local farms—but AG Drew Wrigley, a Gates ally, approved them.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation should compensate vaccine injured, listen to their testimonies
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation finances vaccine roll-outs worldwide, with Bill Gates granted an exclusive platform to promote COVID vaccines globally, going as far as to push lockdowns and other coercive measures to get shots in every arm. After profiting from destructive lockdowns, coercion, medical discrimination, segregation, and the aggressive push for mass vaccinations—achieved through unethical and harmful means—Gates must be held accountable. Courts should compel him to compensate those harmed by COVID vaccines, joining pharmaceutical companies in facing legal consequences.
Moreover, Gates should be required to hear firsthand the testimonies of vaccine-injured individuals—a reality he arrogantly dismisses while continuing to push more vaccines, colluding in censorship, and gaslighting victims by labeling their truths as "disinformation." His collaboration with Big Tech to silence injured voices only deepens the injustice. Justice demands transparency, reparations for victims, and an end to these abuses of power.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
In response to these findings, the FDA recently required stronger warning labels for Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Current data show myocarditis occurs in about 8 cases per million doses for people under 65, with the highest rate — 38 per million — seen in males aged 16–25.
The CDC has acknowledged a causal link between mRNA vaccines and myocarditis since 2021. However, critics allege key data were withheld from the public, including early warnings from the Israeli Ministry of Health and redacted U.S. government reports obtained via FOIA.
With growing calls for accountability, some states like Idaho and Florida have moved to ban or restrict mRNA vaccine use. Experts and lawmakers continue to debate whether ongoing vaccination is justified given the known risks—especially as Pfizer’s key safety study remains unfinished for another five years.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Historically, meningococcal vaccines have faced scrutiny for low efficacy rates and high adverse reaction risks, including Guillain-Barré syndrome. Yet ACIP’s push for newer, costlier options suggests favoritism toward industry, not science. Kennedy’s actions echo past administrations, raising concerns that even under new reform leadership, the CDC remains a captured agency — prioritizing vaccine sales over unbiased safety reviews.
As vaccine mandates expand—including for pregnant women and one-day-old babies — public trust continues to crumble. Studies show flu shot uptake declines as more injections are recommended during pregnancy, prompting new propaganda campaigns to push compliance. Rather than addressing safety concerns, government-backed messaging dismisses risks as “misinformation,” doubling down on coercion.
Kennedy’s latest moves reveal a troubling pattern: dismantling advisory boards for optics while maintaining the same pro-industry policies. Without transparency or accountability, Americans are left questioning whether these recommendations serve public health — or pharmaceutical stockholders.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
DMSO also weakens the walls of drug-resistant microbes, allowing antibiotics to work again against infections. In cancer labs, it is used to protect healthy cells from radiation. In emergency medicine, DMSO has shown promise in preventing paralysis after spinal cord injuries.
The side effects? Only a garlic-like body odor, occasional rashes and/or skin irritation. For most, these are minor compared to the relief it offered.
Safety concerns
Chapter 3 of Tarshis' book, often overlooked in modern retellings, doesn't shy away from hard questions. He explores early safety concerns, particularly a 1965 study in which rodents given extremely high doses of DMSO showed eye lens changes. Though this effect never appeared in humans, the FDA halted clinical trials.
Critics said the halt was less about safety and more about economics. DMSO couldn't be patented. No drug company stood to make billions. And its approval could threaten entire categories of expenses, less effective drugs.
Jacob and Herschler understood the need for regulation, but they criticized the way DMSO was handled. In Senate hearings, they testified that bureaucrats actively discouraged doctors from participating in studies, even intimidating some into silence.
A future still in limbo
More than 60 years after the discovery of its medical significance, DMSO remains approved in the U.S. for only one use: treating interstitial cystitis, a painful bladder disease. For other applications, such as arthritis, burns, injuries, neurotrauma and others, DMSO approval remains in limbo.
Tarshis ended his book with cautious hope. He didn't call for blind acceptance of DMSO. He called for scientific courage – to test what clearly warranted testing and to let the evidence speak louder than the politics.
Today, people still drive across state lines or go to buy veterinary-grade DMSO. Doctors who believe in its power still tread carefully. And patients still ask: If it works, why don't more people know about it?
Dr. Jacob once said, "Twenty-five years from now, people are going to wonder why it took so long." It's been more than 40 years since Tarshis wrote his book. And yes, people are still wondering.
Watch this video to learn more about DMSO.
https://www.brighteon.com/2c5e5c8c-16c4-4794-9578-ac5b0b8c7036
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Utah surgeon faces jail time for allegedly sabotaging COVID-19 vaccines and issuing fake vaccine cards
A plastic surgeon in Utah is facing more than three decades behind bars for allegedly sabotaging Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) injections and issuing fake vaccination cards.
Dr. Michael Kirk Moore Jr., 58, stood trial on Monday, July 7, at the Orrin G. Hatch U.S. Courthouse in Salt Lake City. His trial stemmed from a 2023 Department of Justice (DOJ) indictment. If convicted, Moore could face up to 35 years in prison.
The indictment accused him and his co-defendants of conspiring to defraud the U.S. government by destroying $28,028.50 worth of vaccine vials and distributing 1,937 fake Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vaccination cards. The defendants were also accused of administering saline shots to children whose parents sought to avoid the risks of the actual COVID-19 vaccines.
The case has reignited debates over medical autonomy, government overreach and the ethics of pandemic-era mandates. Prosecutors allege the scheme exploited vulnerable populations, but Moore's supporters argue his actions were principled.
Advocates of medical freedom, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have praised the Utah surgeon publicly. In April of this year, the chief of the Department of Health and Human Services said on X that Moore's actions "deserves a medal for his courage and commitment to healing."
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden praised Moore for providing patients "a choice when others wouldn't," noting that he paid a "tremendous price" for this. Meanwhile, Dr. Margaret Aranda likewise lauded the plastic surgeon for providing Americans exercising their right to health freedom "with a chance to uphold their deeply held personal convictions while safeguarding their futures."
Moore's case testing medical freedom
Meanwhile, prosecutors have argued that Moore's actions endangered public health and violated federal property laws. The prosecuting team is led by Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Utah Felice John Viti, who has investigated terrorists throughout his time in the DOJ.
Critically, the judge has barred discussion of vaccine safety or COVID-19 policies in court – ruling such topics could bias the jury. This restriction has drawn outrage from Moore's defenders, who contend it prevents a full examination of his motives. Moreover, the trial's opaque proceedings – no livestreams or timely transcripts will be available – have heightened tensions.
Historical echoes loom large. Moore's prosecution mirrors past crackdowns on medical dissent, from the persecution of Dr. Andrew Wakefield over his disputed autism-vaccine research to the marginalization of early COVID-19 treatment advocates.
Advocacy groups, including the producers of the controversial film "Died Suddenly," plan to rally outside the courthouse, framing the case as a bellwether for medical freedom. Some of the movie's team members are also mulling attending the trial in person as court reporters.
As jury selection begins, one question remains. Was Moore a renegade protecting patients from an unproven medical intervention, or a criminal undermining public health?
Watch this video of surgeon Dr. Francis Christian, who was suspended for voicing out concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine for children.
https://www.brighteon.com/7adee977-390a-4f01-8a21-58a704821b5d
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Vitamin D deficiency fuels autoimmune conditions, dysregulating immune function
Vitamin D transcends its common label as the "sunshine vitamin" by serving as a cornerstone of immune function and systemic health. Surprisingly, nearly one-third of Americans suffer from dangerously low levels, leaving them vulnerable to chronic illness. Recent scientific investigations highlight how this unseen deficiency exacerbates autoimmune conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis, while also amplifying systemic inflammation. Beyond individual health, this crisis reflects broader societal failures — corporate interests have vilified sun exposure, public health policies neglect nutritional education, and modern lifestyles deprive people of natural vitamin D synthesis. Far from accidental, this deficiency epidemic highlights a troubling disconnect between our biological needs and the systems shaping our daily lives.
Key points:
• Vitamin D regulates immune function, distinguishing between healthy cells and pathogens while suppressing inflammatory markers linked to autoimmunity.
• Deficiency escalates autoimmune risks, with studies showing 55% of rheumatoid arthritis patients and 42% of lupus sufferers lack sufficient levels.
• Low vitamin D correlates with MS progression, as every 10 ng/ml drop increases neuronal damage by 15%.
• Women face heightened vulnerability, with hormonal imbalances and conditions like PCOS exacerbating deficiency.
• Daily supplementation (5,000 IU) is essential to counteract food scarcity and sun deprivation.
Vitamin D as the immune system’s master regulator
Vitamin D is not merely a passive nutrient; it actively trains the immune system to distinguish between healthy cells and foreign pathogens. It accomplishes this by modulating inflammatory responses and suppressing autoimmune reactions. For instance, vitamin D promotes the production of regulatory T-cells, which act as immune peacekeepers by preventing misguided attacks on the body's own tissues. Without sufficient levels, these protective mechanisms falter, allowing inflammation to spiral unchecked. Studies demonstrate that low vitamin D correlates with elevated autoimmune risks — 55% of rheumatoid arthritis patients and 42% of lupus patients exhibit significant deficiencies. Similarly, multiple sclerosis progression accelerates with each 10 ng/ml drop in vitamin D levels, increasing neuronal damage by 15-32%. Given these findings, maintaining optimal vitamin D status is not optional — it is a critical defense against immune dysfunction.
The autoimmune crisis and vitamin D’s protective role
Autoimmune diseases have surged in lockstep with declining vitamin D levels, exposing a troubling paradox: as modern medicine advances, immune dysregulation grows more prevalent. Functional medicine experts, such as Dr. Jennifer Bourgeois, emphasize that vitamin D deficiency disrupts immune tolerance — an essential process that prevents the body from attacking itself. Research published in Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology confirms that rheumatoid arthritis patients disproportionately suffer from insufficient vitamin D, while lupus studies reveal similar trends. Multiple sclerosis patients with low vitamin D levels face faster disease progression and more severe brain lesions. This data underscores vitamin D’s role in quelling inflammatory cytokines — molecules that fuel autoimmune destruction. To reverse this crisis, proactive intervention is essential, starting with widespread supplementation and sunlight exposure.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
WARNING of NEUROLOGICAL REACTION must accompany new RSV TOXIC JAB after string of cases involving Guillain-Barré syndrome
Vaccines are no longer safe for humans. They may have been at some point in history, but now the neurotoxins and spike prions are just too much for the central nervous system to handle, and people are suffering dire consequences from the lethal injections, including the clot shots by Pfizer, and namely the RSV jab.
The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has issued an alert after rare neurological complications were linked to two respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines—Abrysvo, developed by Pfizer, and Arexvy, by GSK. While the vaccines remain approved for use and widely recommended, healthcare professionals are now required to warn patients of the small but serious risk of developing Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a rare neurological condition that requires urgent hospital care.
• UK health regulator MHRA has issued a warning for two RSV vaccines—Pfizer’s Abrysvo and GSK’s Arexvy—after 21 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a rare but serious neurological condition, were reported among older adults who received Abrysvo.
• Healthcare staff are now required to directly inform patients about the potential risk of GBS, although the vaccines are still recommended due to the high risk RSV poses—particularly to elderly and pregnant individuals.
• Guillain-Barré syndrome affects the nervous system, causing symptoms like tingling, muscle weakness, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing or swallowing; while most recover, some may suffer lasting nerve damage.
• Out of nearly 2 million Abrysvo doses administered, only 21 GBS cases have been reported, and none with Arexvy so far in the UK; experts stress the link is not proven, and such rare reactions may occur coincidentally or as immune system misfires.
Health Regulator Issues Warning as Vaccine Given to Millions Is Linked to Debilitating Illness
The warning follows 21 reports of suspected GBS in patients over the age of 60 who received Abrysvo. All reported cases involved individuals aged 75–79. The alert emphasizes that these incidents occurred out of nearly 2 million doses administered in the UK, indicating that the reaction remains very rare—estimated at about 1 in 1,000. To date, no GBS reports have been linked to Arexvy, though its use has been far more limited in the UK.
Guillain-Barré syndrome is an autoimmune condition in which the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks nerve cells. It typically begins with tingling and weakness in the limbs and may progress to affect breathing, swallowing, and even heart function. While most people recover within a year, some suffer permanent nerve damage.
The MHRA's alert requires NHS staff to provide direct verbal warnings to patients—particularly older adults and pregnant women—who are being offered either vaccine. Previously, such risks were only detailed in patient safety leaflets. The MHRA also urged anyone experiencing symptoms of GBS after vaccination, such as numbness, muscle weakness, or difficulty moving or breathing, to seek immediate medical attention.
Despite the new warning, the MHRA, like its US counterpart the FDA, maintains that the benefits of RSV vaccination outweigh the risks. RSV is a highly contagious virus that spreads through droplets, close contact, or contaminated surfaces. It causes severe respiratory illness, especially in infants and the elderly, leading to approximately 8,000 adult and 100 infant deaths annually in the UK, along with many hospitalizations.
RSV vaccines are a recent addition to public health tools in the UK, only approved in the past year. Abrysvo is provided through the NHS, while Arexvy is available privately. Pregnant women are offered the RSV jab to pass immunity to their unborn babies, with studies showing a 70% reduction in severe infection risk for newborns. Current NHS data shows 62% of eligible seniors and 50% of pregnant women in England have received the vaccine.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Trump threatens 200% tariffs on pharmaceutical imports, warns companies to bring manufacturing back to U.S.
President Donald Trump delivered a dramatic warning to the pharmaceutical industry Tuesday, vowing to impose tariffs of up to 200% on imported drugs unless companies swiftly bring their manufacturing operations back to the United States.
The announcement signals another aggressive move in Trump’s economic nationalism agenda, but critics warn it could backfire, driving up medication costs and exacerbating drug shortages.
“They’re going to be tariffs at a very high rate, like 200%,” Trump declared, insisting the penalties would incentivize pharmaceutical giants to reshore production. However, he softened the immediate blow by granting a one- to two-year grace period, stating, “We’ll give them a certain period of time to get their act together.”
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later clarified that finalized plans would emerge by month’s end, pending the completion of national security reviews on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Analysts remained skeptical, noting Trump’s history of tariff threats that fizzle or mutate under industry pressure. Yet with $212 billion in pharmaceutical imports flooding the U.S. last year alone, the stakes for consumers and Big Pharma alike are high.
Big Pharma backlash
The pharmaceutical industry, already reeling from Trump’s drug pricing crackdowns, reacted with alarm. PhRMA, the sector’s top lobbying group, warned that tariffs would drain funds from domestic research and manufacturing investments. “Every dollar spent on tariffs is a dollar that cannot be invested in American manufacturing or the development of future treatments,” said PhRMA’s Alex Schriver.
Generics, which dominate the U.S. medication supply, face the greatest risk. With razor-thin profit margins, generic drug makers rely heavily on overseas production, particularly in India and China. Brookings Institution analysts cautioned that sudden tariffs could trigger shortages of critical medications, from antibiotics to chemotherapy drugs.
Stock markets shrugged off the news, with pharmaceutical shares holding steady, likely due to Trump’s delayed implementation timeline. Leerink Partners analyst David Risinger called the announcement positive for the industry, given the uncertainty of enforcement. But for American patients, the long-term outlook remains fraught. If companies pass tariff costs to consumers, already-strained household budgets could face even steeper medical bills.
A gamble on reshoring
Trump’s tariff push is part of a broader strategy to revive U.S. manufacturing, which was a core 2024 campaign promise. Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie have recently announced domestic expansions, although some were planned pre-Trump. The president framed the tariffs as a necessary jolt.
Yet experts note that rebuilding pharmaceutical supply chains could take years, far exceeding Trump’s proposed grace period. The UNC Center for the Business of Health warned that reshoring may only benefit brand-name drugs, leaving generics in limbo.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Naturopathic advocate Dr. Peter Glidden reveals how big pharma’s monopoly fuels chronic disease epidemic
• Pharmaceutical Industry Criticism: Dr. Glidden condemns the profit-driven pharmaceutical industry for exacerbating chronic diseases like autism and Alzheimer’s, blaming symptom-focused medicine for sidelining holistic cures through systemic corruption.
• Historical Monopoly: He traces healthcare’s crisis to 1913, when the AMA, backed by corporate interests, established a drug-only treatment monopoly, excluding naturopathic solutions from insurance and medical education.
• Cycle of Dependency: Modern healthcare traps patients in a costly cycle of non-curative treatments, worsening conditions (e.g., Tylenol linked to autism) while ignoring nutrition and mineral deficiencies as root causes.
• Holistic Healing vs. Allopathy: Naturopathy focuses on the body’s innate healing, addressing root causes with minerals and detox, unlike allopathy’s suppression tactics or “green allopathy’s” pharmaceutical mimicry.
• Call to Action: Glidden warns of societal collapse due to unsustainable healthcare costs and toxic exposures, advocating grassroots education and “health freedom sanctuaries” to bypass restrictive regulations.
In a revealing interview on Brighteon. com, naturopathic physician Dr. Peter Glidden delivered a damning indictment of the pharmaceutical industry’s stranglehold on healthcare, linking its profit-driven model to the explosion of chronic illnesses like autism, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s. With 36 years of clinical experience, Glidden argued that conventional medicine’s focus on symptom suppression—rather than cure—has created a “chronic disease epidemic” while sidelining holistic alternatives through systemic corruption and legislative monopolies.
The Medical Monopoly’s Hostile Takeover
Glidden traced today’s crisis to 1913, when the American Medical Association (AMA), backed by corporate interests like the Rockefellers, secured exclusive control over medical practice. “The only thing legally allowed to treat a disease in the U.S. is a drug,” he emphasized, noting that this monopoly has shaped insurance coverage, hospital care, and even medical education to exclude naturopathic solutions. Despite growing skepticism post-COVID, he warned that real change requires “medical freedom”—a concept championed by Founding Father Dr. Benjamin Rush, who predicted medicine would become a “dictatorship” without constitutional safeguards.
The Repeat-Business Model of Disease
Glidden likened modern healthcare to a cycle of dependency: patients pay exorbitant insurance premiums, receive treatments that manage but never cure their conditions, and ultimately face bankruptcy or premature death. “Your doctor got rich while you got sick under their care,” he said, highlighting how pharmaceuticals—especially post-vaccine adjuvants like aluminum—aggravate conditions (e.g., Tylenol’s role in breaking the blood-brain barrier and worsening autism). Meanwhile, nutrition and mineral deficiencies—long ignored by policymakers—fuel degenerative diseases, yet “MDs aren’t taught what health is.”
The Holistic Alternative
Unlike allopathic medicine’s “oppositional defiance” (e.g., anti-inflammatories, antidepressants), naturopathy empowers the body’s innate healing. “Health is the ability to experience stress and remain symptom-free,” Glidden explained. He criticized “green allopathy”—using plant-based molecules to mimic pharmaceuticals—as equally reductionist. True healing, he argued, requires addressing root causes through minerals, herbs, and detoxification, yet naturopathic schools now dilute these principles under regulatory pressure.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Synthetic human DNA project sparks ethical alarms amid fertility crisis
In July 2025, British scientists embarked on a controversial quest to synthesize the entire human genome from scratch, raising urgent ethical questions about humanity’s future. The $13.7 million project, led by Oxford University, seeks to create synthetic DNA to combat diseases and address a global fertility crisis, but critics warn it risks crossing a moral Rubicon. With sperm counts halving since the 1970s and microplastics accumulating in human tissues, the drive for lab-made solutions may unleash irrevocable consequences. As the documentary Playing God highlighted, this research could redefine life itself—or spell its undoing.
The science and the stakes: A synthetic DNA breakthrough or a biological time bomb?
The project’s stated goals include developing therapies for autoimmune disorders, heart failure and aging. Scientists plan to build synthetic DNA segments and insert them into skin cells, a process likened to “rewriting the genetic code from scratch.” By constructing entire chromosomes, researchers hope to unlock insights into how faulty genes trigger diseases and, eventually, repair them.
Yet unease looms. “The genie is out of the bottle,” warns University of Edinburgh geneticist Prof. Bill Earnshaw. “If an organization with the right equipment decided to start synthesizing anything, I don’t think we could stop them.” Ethicist Dr. Pat Thomas adds, “The science can be repurposed to harm and even for warfare.”
Historical precedents, like the 2010 creation of Synthia (the first synthetic bacterium), show progress can outpace ethics. But human DNA, with its 3 billion base pairs, is exponentially more complex. The project’s five-year timeline—culminating in a synthetic chromosome—leaves little room for reflection.
Why the rush to reinvent humanity?
The urgency stems from alarming trends. Global sperm counts have dropped 50% since 1970, according to studies led by Hebrew University’s Hagai Levine. Environmental pollutants, plastics and electromagnetic radiation are prime suspects. A 2024 study revealed human brains now harbor “a spoon’s worth” of microplastics, with levels rising sharply in recent years. Plastic particles also turn up in reproductive fluids, impairing egg and sperm quality.
“This is an existential problem,” asserts Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “A teenager today has less testosterone than a 68-year-old man.” With infertile populations growing, some nations eye synthetic solutions: lab-grown “designer babies” or artificial wombs. But critics argue this abandons real-world solutions, like curbing plastic waste or curbing toxins, in favor of risky “fixes.”
Ethics and morality: At what cost to humanity?
The project’s social research component—a nod to ethical scrutiny—is seen as insufficient by many. “We’re talking about creating life itself,” says Prof. Iain Brassington. “Would synthetic humans have souls? Are we playing dice with our species’ future?”
Theologians and bioethicists highlight profound spiritual implications. “God’s creation is sacred,” insists Rev. Jane Whitaker, director of the Coalition for Ethical Science. “Synthetic DNA treats humans as products, not beings made in God’s image.” Meanwhile, the libertarian Cato Institute warns of eugenic abuses: “A future where elites engineer ‘superior’ humans?”
The environmental risks are equally stark. Engineered organisms—like bacteria designed to digest microplastics—could mutate unpredictably. “A lab accident or rogue release could trigger ecological collapse,” cautions Dr. Elena Petrova of Greenpeace.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
GEN X’ers and MILLENIALS getting CANCER of the appendix at FOUR TIMES RATE since COVID spike prion injections rollout – Coincidence?
Natural health advocates warned the world about the Covid clot shots, saying something insidious would happen to those injected with prion-creating technology that had never been tested on humans for safety or efficacy. Now look what’s happening. Billions of people, including healthy young folks, are suffering from hyper-developing turbo cancer in organs they’ve never had cancer in before, like in their appendix. Take a look.
The unprecedented spike in appendix cancer among younger generations serves as a warning: something fundamental in the modern environment, diet, or lifestyle is disrupting the body’s defenses and driving cancer rates higher. Without clear answers from medicine yet, individuals are urged to take proactive steps to protect their health through informed lifestyle changes and preventive care.
• Appendix cancer has surged by 400% among Gen X and millennials, with people born between 1981–1989 facing four times the cancer risk compared to those born in the 1940s—making it one of the most dramatic increases ever recorded.
• Doctors remain baffled by the spike, with no clear cause identified; leading theories include early-life exposure to ultra-processed foods, environmental toxins, antibiotic overuse, and chronic stress—all of which may compromise gut health and immune function.
• Symptoms are vague and often mistaken for common digestive issues, such as bloating, nausea, and abdominal pain; most cases are discovered incidentally during emergency surgery, often after the cancer has already spread.
• There’s currently no screening for appendix cancer, making prevention through diet, toxin avoidance, immune support, and inflammation reduction crucial for younger generations facing unprecedented cancer risks.
Mind-blowing 400% increase in appendix cancer among Gen X and millennials
A recent study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine has revealed a staggering 400% increase in appendix cancer among Gen X and millennials, prompting urgent concern from the medical community. This alarming rise is one of the most dramatic cancer increases ever documented and has left experts searching for answers.
The research, based on data from nearly 5,000 appendix cancer patients over 45 years, found that individuals born between 1976–1984 had more than triple the risk of appendix cancer compared to those born in the 1940s. Those born between 1981–1989 faced four times the risk. Dr. Andreana Holowatyj from Vanderbilt University described these findings as “alarming and worrisome.”
Although appendix cancer is still relatively rare, affecting 1–2 people per million annually, its sharp rise in younger generations is troubling. The cancer is typically discovered by accident during emergency surgery for appendicitis, when it's often already advanced and has spread within the abdomen. There's no screening method, and symptoms are easily mistaken for everyday digestive issues—such as bloating, nausea, abdominal discomfort, or vomiting. These vague signs often delay diagnosis until it's too late.
Previously dismissed as a useless organ, the appendix is now understood to play a role in immune function. This makes its cancerous transformation even more concerning, especially in the context of broader generational health patterns. Researchers are struggling to pinpoint the exact cause of this surge, but many believe it’s multifactorial, stemming from childhood exposures that are only now manifesting as cancer in adulthood.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Almost 75% of “FDA-approved” drugs DON’T MEET their own standard of scientific criteria
A major two-year investigation has exposed deep flaws in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) drug approval process. From 2013 to 2022, nearly 75% of new drug approvals failed to meet the agency’s own minimum scientific standards — a revelation that is sparking alarm among health professionals, researchers, and patients alike.
• Majority of FDA drug approvals fail basic standards: A two-year investigation revealed that nearly 75% of new drugs approved by the FDA between 2013 and 2022 did not meet the agency’s own four scientific criteria — including the use of control groups, blinded studies, clinical endpoints, and replication — raising serious doubts about their effectiveness.
• Fast-tracked approvals often based on surrogate markers: Many drugs, especially for cancer and Alzheimer’s, were approved using surrogate outcomes like tumor shrinkage or protein levels rather than proven benefits like improved survival or cognitive function. Some, like the Alzheimer’s drug Leqembi, were linked to brain inflammation, hemorrhaging, and even death.
• Database exposes flaws in drug approval system: A new searchable tool rates 429 drugs approved during the past decade based on how many of the FDA’s scientific criteria they met. Drugs scoring 0–2 out of 4 are considered to have insufficient evidence backing their safety and efficacy, despite being widely prescribed.
• Experts urge patients to question prescriptions: Medical professionals advise the public to delay new drugs, research approval histories, and ask doctors whether medications improve real-world outcomes. Fast-tracked drugs, often pushed through under political or industry pressure, may carry serious undisclosed risks.
FDA drug approval system under fire: Investigation reveals hundreds of ineffective and dangerous medications
The joint investigation by The Lever and the McGraw Center for Business Journalism analyzed 429 new drug approvals over a decade, uncovering that the majority were approved based on weak, incomplete, or surrogate evidence. Instead of demonstrating clear improvements in survival, quality of life, or symptom relief, many drugs were fast-tracked based on lab results or imaging changes — surrogate markers that don’t always translate into real-world benefits.
Of particular concern were cancer and Alzheimer’s drugs. Only 2.4% of FDA-approved cancer medications during the study period met all four basic scientific criteria: a control group, trial replication, blinding, and meaningful clinical endpoints.
Alarmingly, 23% of these drugs met none of the four standards. Alzheimer’s drugs, such as Leqembi, were linked to severe brain inflammation and deaths, despite limited evidence of their actual benefit.
One case highlighted in the report is that of Genevieve Lane, who died six weeks after receiving Leqembi during an extension of its clinical trial. She was one of several individuals who suffered severe or fatal side effects from a drug that was rushed to market under the FDA’s Accelerated Approval pathway.
The root of the problem, investigators found, stems from policy shifts that began in the 1980s during the AIDS crisis. Facing pressure from activists and pharmaceutical companies to speed up access to potentially lifesaving drugs, the FDA adopted looser standards and began accepting surrogate outcomes like tumor shrinkage or protein levels as sufficient proof of efficacy.
While well-intentioned, this shift opened the floodgates for drugmakers to win approvals based on incomplete data — often with no follow-up studies to confirm long-term safety or effectiveness.
The investigation also uncovered numerous adverse outcomes from other FDA-approved drugs. For instance, Elmiron, a drug for bladder conditions, was linked to vision loss and dozens of deaths. Despite these outcomes, the drug remained on the market, highlighting a troubling tolerance for risk in the FDA’s current approval system.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Shocking 20% death surge in South Africa directly correlates with covid vaccine rollout, ignored data reveals
The grim reality is now undeniable: South Africa’s mortality rates exploded in 2021, skyrocketing by nearly 20% just as COVID-19 vaccines were aggressively pushed onto its population. Far from ushering in safety, this unprecedented death surge aligned eerily with mass vaccination campaigns—a pattern too alarming to dismiss as mere coincidence. While mainstream media parrots the establishment’s hollow reassurances about vaccine safety, the data from South Africa’s own vital statistics paints a chilling picture of betrayal. The truth? A "crisis" that was never about the virus itself but about a deadly medical experiment disguised as salvation.
While mainstream media echoes establishment reassurances, South Africa’s government data—ignored but accessible—exposes a chilling betrayal. The crisis wasn’t driven by the virus; rather, death curves tracked vaccine rollout schedules, suggesting a deadly medical experiment marketed as salvation.
Key points:
South Africa recorded a devastating 19.6% increase in deaths in 2021, coinciding with mass covid vaccine rollouts.
• The timing is damning: deaths surged as vaccines were widely administered, particularly mid-2021, following Pfizer/J&J campaign peaks.
• Unvaccinated children under 19 showed no such spike, a glaring anomaly that dismantles claims of natural pandemic effects.
Deaths spiked across all vaccinated age groups, except children under 19, who were largely spared injections.
• The Philippines, U.S., and U.K. saw matching trends—hyper-excess deaths synchronized with mass vaccinations.
• In the U.S., 674,954 excess deaths in 2021 surpassed 2020’s peak, disproving the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" narrative.
Data shows vaccination programs ramped up alongside deaths, obliterating claims of coincidence—yet oversight bodies remain silent. Similar catastrophic death trends matched vaccine deployments worldwide, raising urgent suspicion of systemic toxicity.
Deliberate omissions:
• South Africa withheld post-2021 records, while SAMRC avoided injection-fatality links, despite data screaming causation.
• Where are the autopsy spikes? The toxicology reports? Authorities dismiss questions, branding evidence as "anecdotal."
The undeniable evidence: South Africa’s death catastrophe
South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) records expose a horrifying timeline. Death reports—separated into natural and non-natural causes—show 2021's death toll was unlike anything seen before, even eclipsing 2020’s rise. Despite authorities’ desperate attempts to blame delayed registrations or “pandemic aftereffects,” no logical explanation holds up against the timing. Vaccines rolled out in February 2021, yet deaths didn’t skyrocket until mid-year—exactly as coverage surged.
Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson dominated South Africa’s inoculation efforts. By September 2023, 33.7% of South Africans had received at least one dose. Yet, the body counts soared, particularly among those injected. Death increases occurred in all vaccinated cohorts, while unvaccinated children stayed starkly unaffected—a damning disparity.
Silenced voices: The global pattern of excess deaths
South Africa is far from alone. The Philippines saw hyper-excess deaths synced perfectly with Janssen (J&J) vaccine rollouts. The U.S. logged 674,954 excess deaths in 2021, even surpassing 2020’s so-called pandemic peak. Was this “healthcare” or state-sanctioned carnage?
Historically, medical malfeasance has reached this magnitude only in wartime—or during forced pharmaceutical campaigns. From Thalidomide’s hidden deformities to tobacco industry lies, corporate greed routinely sacrifices lives. Yet today’s pharmacrats dodge accountability with fabricated narratives.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Trump DOJ subpoenas doctors and clinics accused of mutilating children in “gender transition” procedures
In a landmark move to protect vulnerable minors from irreversible medical harm, the Trump Department of Justice has unleashed a sweeping investigation into doctors and facilities suspected of performing so-called "gender transition" procedures on children. The DOJ announced this week that it had issued more than 20 subpoenas targeting medical professionals involved in administering puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries to minors—practices many argue constitute child abuse under the guise of healthcare. Attorney General Pam Bondi delivered a blistering rebuke, vowing to hold accountable those who "mutilated children in the service of a warped ideology."
The crackdown follows President Donald Trump’s executive order halting federal support for underage transitions, reversing Biden-era policies that facilitated experimental treatments for gender-confused youth. While the order didn’t criminalize the procedures outright, it empowered federal agencies to scrutinize potential violations of healthcare fraud statutes and false claims, exposing how activists in white coats may have bypassed legal safeguards to push life-altering interventions.
Fraud, coercion, and lifelong harm
The DOJ’s subpoenas zero in on alleged “healthcare fraud, false statements, and more,” according to an official press release. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines further suggest doctors could face consequences if they withheld risks or inflated benefits of "gender-affirming" care — a euphemism critics argue obscures the brutality of procedures that leave minors sterile, scarred, and plagued by regret.
Evidence increasingly reveals the catastrophic toll of these interventions. More than 80% of children with gender dysphoria outgrow it naturally by adulthood, yet clinics rush to chemically and surgically alter them, often ignoring comorbidities such as depression or trauma. Detransitioners, whose voices are routinely silenced, have testified to suffering from irreversible damage, including severed healthy tissue, crushed fertility, and psychological torment worsened by ideologically driven medicine.
A 2022 undercover investigation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s transgender clinic exposed another motive: profiteering. Dr. Shayne Sebold Taylor admitted on camera that “these surgeries make a lot of money” in a damning glimpse into an industry that is increasingly being known for prioritizing revenue over ethics.
“These surgeries are labor intensive, there are a lot of follow-ups, they require a lot of our time, and they make money,” Dr. Sebold Taylor added.
Global backlash mounts as U.S. takes action
While American medical associations, many of which are entangled in activism, defend pediatric transitions, nations like England and Sweden have reversed course, restricting puberty blockers and hormones due to weak evidence and catastrophic outcomes. The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent 6-3 decision upholding Tennessee’s ban on child transgender procedures signaled judicial momentum toward protecting minors from this type of predatory medicine.
The DOJ’s subpoenas mark a critical step in reining in an out-of-control medical complex. For too long, children have been pawns in a cultural war while being subjected to untested treatments that masquerade as compassion. With investigations now underway, accountability finally looms for those who traded scalpels for ideology.
This isn’t merely about lawbreaking; it’s about lives shattered. The DOJ’s action offers hope that America’s children will no longer be collateral damage in a battle for “progress.”
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Mullein should have been recommended as a first line treatment for sinuses and lungs during the COVID hysteria
For centuries, mankind has turned to the earth for remedies — powerful, natural solutions that promote respiratory health without toxic pharmaceuticals. Yet today, as millions suffer from chronic coughs, asthma, and lung damage post-Covid, one ancient herb stands out as a front line defense: mullein (Verbascum thapsus). This potent plant has been systematically ignored by the medical-industrial complex, which profits from perpetual sickness rather than true healing.
Mullein is no ordinary weed. With striking yellow flower spikes and velvety, soft leaves, this biennial herb acts as a soothing, anti-inflammatory expectorant, clearing congestion and repairing damaged lung tissue naturally. But modern medicine would rather you rely on chemical-laden inhalers and immunosuppressive drugs than harness mullein’s antimicrobial, antiviral, and mucolytic properties. This herbal medicine has proven effective for millennia, used by Native American tribes and the like to survive harsh conditions and respiratory infections.
Key points:
• Mullein (Verbascum thapsus) has been used for centuries to treat respiratory illness, acting as both an expectorant and demulcent.
• Scientific studies confirm its antibacterial and anti-tumor properties, particularly against Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae.
• Unlike Big Pharma’s toxic cough syrups, mullein soothes lung irritation while detoxing from pollution, allergens, smoking, and infections.
• It can be consumed as tea, tincture, infused oil, or cough drops, offering safe, natural alternatives to corporate medicine’s overpriced drugs.
• Despite its proven benefits, mainstream medicine continues to suppress herbal remedies like mullein in favor of profitable, dependency-forming drugs.
• During the COVID-19 hysteria, mullein should have been recommended as a first line defense.
The respiratory super herb blacklisted from pharmacies
For those suffering from bronchitis, asthma, or post-Covid lung damage, mullein offers a direct, natural solution. Historical records show this herb has been used medicinally since ancient Europe and Asia, valued for its ability to clear mucus, reduce inflammation, and fight infections.
A 2002 study published in Journal of Ethnopharmacology demonstrated mullein’s antibacterial effects against pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli, validating its traditional use in respiratory care. Another study found mullein inhibited tumor growth — suggesting protective benefits against lung infections that mainstream medicine refuses to acknowledge.
Unlike steroid inhalers and opioid-laced cough syrups, mullein does not suppress the immune system or cause dangerous side effects. Instead, it strengthens lung function, making it a critical tool for those recovering from smoking, pollution, or viral infections.
How to use mullein for optimal lung health
Mullein is remarkably versatile, offering multiple preparation methods to maximize lung benefits:
1. Mullein Leaf Tea
Steep 1-2 tsp dried mullein leaf in boiling water for 10-15 minutes. Three cups daily can soothe inflamed throat tissues, thin mucus, and improve breathing.
2. Mullein Tincture
A 12-18 mL daily dose (2-3 tsp) provides potent antimicrobial and expectorant effects — ideal for long-term lung detoxification. To make a tincture, steep mullein plant parts in 151 proof grain alcohol, making sure to cover all the plant parts in alcohol. Let stand in a cool, dark environment for at least one month, allowing the alcohol to slowly extract the plant constituents, while preserving the phytochemicals in the suspension. After thirty days, strain the plant parts from the alcohol and pour the finished product in a vial with a dropper, so the alcohol can be administered in small doses.
3. Mullein Infused Oil
Rubbed on the chest, mullein oil reduces congestion and inflammation, particularly when blended with peppermint or eucalyptus essential oils.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Bill Gates faces Dutch court showdown over COVID vaccine injuries as plaintiffs accuse him of deception and genocide
Bill Gates—the billionaire philanthropist turned global vaccine czar—is now facing fresh legal scrutiny as three new plaintiffs seek to join a Dutch lawsuit accusing him, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and 15 other defendants of misleading the public about the safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The lawsuit, filed by seven injured victims last year (one now deceased), alleges deliberate deception, coercion, and even "murder" in the mass vaccination campaign. But this legal reckoning is just the tip of the iceberg. Gates’ deep financial investments in mRNA technology, coupled with his aggressive push for global vaccinations, reveal a disturbing pattern: profiting from a public health disaster while evading accountability for the injuries and deaths his products have caused.
The Dutch case against Gates and Pfizer hinges on truth-telling. Defense lawyers argue "vaccines are safe"—yet injured plaintiffs sat in court, ignored by officials. Plaintiffs’ lawyer Peter Stassen warned judges: "If you silence experts, their blood is on your hands."
Meanwhile, Dutch authorities arrested another plaintiffs’ attorney—Arno van Kessel—in a shocking raid, holding him in high-security prison without charges. Critics call it intimidation to derail justice for the victims of vaccine injury.
Key points:
• Three new vaccine-injured plaintiffs seek to join a Dutch lawsuit against Gates and Pfizer, accusing them of hiding vaccine risks.
• Proposed expert witnesses—including ex-pharma executives and bioweapons experts—will testify on vaccine dangers.
• Gates heavily invested in BioNTech (Pfizer’s partner) and CureVac before COVID, selling shares for massive profit.
• U.S. military and taxpayer-funded mRNA research laid the groundwork for Gates’ lucrative vaccine empire.
• Gates is buying massive farmland holdings in states with mRNA research hubs, raising concerns about control over food and medical supply chains.
How Gates profited from mRNA—Long before COVID
Bill Gates didn’t jump on the mRNA bandwagon during the pandemic—he helped build it. Public-private collusion between the U.S. government and Big Pharma allowed Gates to cash in on experimental biotech while maintaining plausible deniability.
1. Military and government funding
As Sasha Latypova, a former pharmaceutical executive, explains, "mRNA tech wouldn’t exist without Pentagon funding." The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) funneled billions into bioweapons research disguised as 'defensive' biosecurity. Moderna, a key mRNA developer, received $1 billion from BARDA in 2020 alone—yet hid DARPA’s role in its patents, violating federal law.
2. Pre-plandemic investments
Gates bet big on mRNA years ahead of COVID:
2017-2019: Pumped $155M into BioNTech, later sold for huge profits.
2015: Invested $162M into CureVac, a Gates Foundation mRNA partner.
2023: Pledged $40M for mRNA vaccine factories in Africa.
And it’s not just vaccines—Gates owns companies producing mRNA components:
• Aldevron: Manufactures DNA for Moderna’s shots.
• Danaher Corp: Controls lipid nanoparticle encapsulation (key for mRNA delivery).
Farmland acquisitions: control over food and Pharma?
While pushing global mRNA injections, Gates quietly purchased over 20,000 acres in North Dakota, Nebraska, and Wisconsin—states hosting mRNA research hubs. Suspiciously, his "Red River Trust" shell company skirted North Dakota’s anti-corporate farming laws, thanks to Gov. Doug Burgum, a former Microsoft exec who received $107,000 from Gates.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
HIGHLY CORRUPT PFIZER won’t release MYOCARDITIS study results because vaccine “safety” claim will obviously get blown out of the water
Pfizer is facing growing scrutiny after delaying the completion of its post-marketing safety study on myocarditis and pericarditis in individuals under 21 who received its COVID-19 vaccine. Originally scheduled to be completed in 2024, the study’s new end date is November 2030 — eight years later than initially planned.
The delay has prompted accusations from medical experts and public health advocates of potential data suppression, especially in light of increasing evidence linking mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to heart inflammation in young people.
• Pfizer has delayed completion of its myocarditis safety study in individuals under 21 to November 2030, sparking criticism over transparency and concern that interim findings — which have not been released — may reveal safety issues with its COVID-19 vaccine.
• The study, involving 300 vaccinated participants and 100 controls, defines myocarditis cases only within seven days of vaccination, a narrow window that experts say could underestimate the true incidence compared to broader definitions used by the CDC and other health authorities.
• Updated FDA vaccine labels now warn of increased myocarditis risk, especially among males aged 16–25, with Pfizer and Moderna both required to include stronger language after mounting evidence from international and U.S. sources linked mRNA shots to heart inflammation.
• Multiple studies and adverse event reports, including VAERS data and international research, continue to show elevated myocarditis risks post-vaccination, fueling calls for greater scrutiny, transparency, and even moratoriums or bans on mRNA vaccines in some U.S. states.
Pfizer pushes deadline for study of myocarditis in kids and adults under 21
Launched in November 2022, the study is a collaborative effort with the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. It follows 300 participants under age 21 who developed myocarditis or pericarditis after receiving Pfizer’s vaccine, with a control group of 100 individuals who developed similar conditions after a COVID-19 infection or related complications. Despite ongoing data collection, no interim results have been publicly released.
Critics argue that if the findings were positive, Pfizer would likely have already published them. Dr. Clayton J. Baker stated, “If their findings were reassuring, there would be a strong incentive to release them now.” Delaying results until 2030 while continuing vaccine administration, he said, is scientifically irresponsible.
Study design flaws have also been highlighted. Investigative journalist Sonia Elijah criticized the narrow definition of vaccine-related myocarditis — only counting cases diagnosed within seven days of vaccination. This contradicts other health guidelines. The CDC allows a 40-day window, while the Brighton Collaboration recognizes up to six weeks. VAERS data suggests symptoms can emerge up to 120 days post-vaccination. Elijah and others also noted the lack of an unvaccinated control group, making it harder to clearly establish causality.
Enrollment difficulties are another issue. Experts suggest Pfizer may be struggling to recruit enough participants, as noted by Dr. Jane Orient. With only 300 participants, the study lacks sufficient power to detect rare but serious side effects. Additionally, participant dropout over time could further undermine the study’s credibility.
Despite Pfizer’s delay, independent studies continue to link COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to increased heart inflammation risks. A South Korean study published in July 2024 found a 620% higher risk of myocarditis in vaccinated individuals. A 2024 UK study of 1.7 million children found myocarditis and pericarditis occurred only in vaccinated children. Likewise, a 2022 Nordic study involving 23.1 million people confirmed elevated myocarditis risk, especially among males aged 16 to 24.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Secretary Kennedy expands access to RSV, chikungunya, and meningococcal vaccines, despite disbanding ‘conflicted’ advisory panel
The CDC’s revolving door of vaccine recommendations continues to spin unchecked, with new recommendations expanding access to RSV, meningococcal, and Chikungunya vaccines. Meanwhile, COVID jabs and flu vaccines remain on the market, ushering in new boosters with each season. Under Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s watch, the agency continues to push experimental vaccines, mimicking the very pro-vaccine orthodoxy he once denounced. Behind the scenes, his administration accelerates access to untested jabs, leaving a trail of unanswered concerns in the rush to appease pharmaceutical interests. Despite promises of reform, the stagnation at Health and Human Services mirrors the inertia of past administrations — pledging transparency while deepening reliance on the same profit-driven framework that prioritizes vaccines over comprehensive public health solutions.
Days after dismantling the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) over alleged conflicts of interest, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. quietly adopted its previous recommendation to expand RSV vaccine access — despite mounting concerns over injuries and weak efficacy data. In a move critics call hypocritical, Kennedy has rubber-stamped policies from the same "corrupt" advisors he ousted, pushing RSV shots into older age groups while ignoring unanswered questions about long-term risks and acute injuries. With no CDC director in place, Kennedy is bypassing public scrutiny and fast-tracking vaccine schedules, proving once again that the medical establishment prioritizes Big Pharma profits over genuine public health, despite the rhetoric of change.
Key points:
• RFK Jr. adopted ACIP's recommendation to expand RSV vaccines for adults aged 50–59, despite disbanding the panel weeks earlier over conflicts of interest.
• The policy was quietly enacted June 25 without input from Kennedy’s newly appointed advisors.
• Multiple RSV vaccines, including GSK and Pfizer shots, remain unvetted in injury compensation programs.
• Kennedy also approved a new pentavalent meningococcal vaccine for adolescents—funded by taxpayers through the VFC program.
• Critics question why Kennedy dismantled ACIP only to adopt their policies, raising suspicions of industry influence behind closed doors.
A vaccine panel disbanded — then rubber-stamped
In April 2025, ACIP voted 14-0 (with one abstention) to expand RSV vaccine recommendations, citing "clear benefits" for at-risk adults under 60 — despite lacking long-term safety data. Just two months later, Kennedy dissolved ACIP, alleging undisclosed financial ties among members. Yet, instead of halting questionable recommendations, Kennedy quietly signed off on the RSV expansion, leaving the public in the dark.
Dr. Jane Zucker, a former ACIP advisor, argued during the April meeting that vulnerable patients, such as transplant recipients, "would clearly benefit" from RSV shots. But missing from debate was any discussion of injury reports or the glaring lack of liability for manufacturers. With RSV vaccines newly added to the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), injured patients must navigate a government-run claims process that rejects 70% of cases. Meanwhile, COVID-19 shot injuries filed under the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) have surpassed 12,233 claims, including 9,221 from the jab itself.
Pentavalent vaccine push — who profits?
Kennedy also accepted ACIP’s recommendation to add GSK’s pentavalent meningococcal vaccine (Penmenvy) to the immunization schedule, despite already approving Pfizer’s nearly identical shot in 2023. Both vaccines, marketed as superior to older options, will be bankrolled by taxpayers through the Vaccines for Children program — a lucrative win for the vaccine industry, as their fraud and manipulation continues unchecked.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Barry Tarshis on DMSO: The remarkable, safe painkiller Big Pharma doesn’t want you to know about
In the mid-1960s, a humble lab chemical from the paper industry catapulted into the medical spotlight. Dimethyl sulfoxide – better known as DMSO – wasn't just another solvent. It was called a "miracle drug" that offers hope for people suffering from a wide variety of ailments, from sprained ankles and arthritis to spinal cord injuries and brain trauma.
Despite thousands of studies, broad international use and impassioned support from scientists and patients alike, DMSO never received full approval in the United States. It remained locked out of the mainstream, relegated to underground networks, feed stores and whispers in waiting rooms.
So what happened? Why did one of the most promising discoveries in modern medicine become a medical pariah – a treatment shunned and persistently ignored?
This is the story the late journalist Barry Tarshis tried to tell in his 1981 exposé, "DMSO: The true story of a remarkable pain-killing drug." Based on years of investigative journalism and unprecedented access to Dr. Stanley Jacob and chemist Robert Herschler – the two men who uncovered DMSO's medical potential – the book aims to do what the system would not: inform the public.
A cure from the paper mill
DMSO wasn't born in a pharmaceutical lab. It was a byproduct of paper manufacturing, long used as an industrial solvent. First synthesized in 1866 by Russian chemist Alexander Zaytsev, it sat for nearly a century in chemical catalogs, unremarked upon despite Zaytsev's article about DMSO's unique ability to dissolve both polar (water-loving) and non-polar (fat-loving) substances appearing in a German publication in 1867.
But that changed in the 1950s when chemist Robert Herschler, working for major paper company Crown Zellerback, began exploring its unusual properties. Herschler noticed that when DMSO touched his skin and that of his colleagues, they could taste "garlic" within minutes – a sign that it was quickly penetrating the skin and entering the bloodstream.
One day, after accidentally spilling a mustard-gas-like compound on his hand, Herschler instinctively applied DMSO. The pain from the chemical burn disappeared. The blisters vanished. That moment changed everything.
DMSO's unique carrier ability – transporting other substances through the skin and into the body – was both promising and problematic. DMSO could deliver drugs past the blood-brain barrier, but it could also potentially carry toxins. That duality would later fuel controversy.
A doctor's leap of faith
When Herschler met Dr. Stanley W. Jacob, a surgeon and cryobiologist at Oregon Health & Science University, their collaboration ignited a medical revolution. Jacob had been searching for ways to preserve organs for transplant. When he discovered that DMSO prevented ice damage in tissues, he began testing it more broadly.
What he found was astonishing. DMSO reduced inflammation, relieved pain and accelerated healing – often when other treatments failed. In one case, a six-year-old girl with crippling juvenile rheumatoid arthritis moved her neck for the first time in years, just half an hour after DMSO application.
Jacob began treating patients with DMSO. The results were often dramatic. He didn't claim it was a cure-all – but for many, it was the first real relief they'd had in years.
The science behind the hype
What makes DMSO so unusual isn't just what it does – it's how many things it seems to do. It is an analgesic (painkiller), anti-inflammatory, cryopreservative, muscle relaxant, vasodilator, a potential neuroprotector and more.
Studies show it soaks up free radicals – highly reactive molecules that cause cell damage and pain. It calms C-fibers, the nerve fibers associated with classic chronic pain. In animals, its painkilling effect lasts longer than morphine. And unlike opioids, DMSO is not addictive.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Corporate interests, sunlight phobia and systemic sabotage
Decades of corporate messaging have falsely demonized sun exposure, branding it as inherently dangerous while ignoring its role in vitamin D synthesis. The beauty and pharmaceutical industries have profited from this fear, aggressively marketing sunscreens and indoor lifestyles that disrupt natural vitamin D production. Dr. Katie Golden highlights the consequences: Over 20 million Americans now struggle with autoimmune conditions, many linked to chronic deficiency. Compounding the issue, modern dietary trends fail to fill this gap — breast milk often lacks sufficient vitamin D, and children weaned onto nutrient-poor juices risk deficiency early in life. Even vaccinations lose efficacy in individuals with low vitamin D, illustrating its broader immunological impact. Corporate profits from cosmetics and sunscreen overshadow an inconvenient truth: many beauty products contain toxins linked to autoimmune disease, while vitamin D itself helps detoxify such harmful compounds.
A roadmap to recovery: Rebuilding immunity through vitamin D
Restoring vitamin D to optimal levels — ideally above 50 ng/ml — requires daily supplementation, ideally 5,000 IU or more. While nutrient-dense foods like grass-fed liver and fatty fish offer support, modern lifestyles make supplementation indispensable. For women, addressing deficiency is particularly urgent; sufficient vitamin D halves breast cancer risk and mitigates conditions like PCOS. Despite these benefits, conventional medicine often overlooks deficiency’s role in disorders ranging from autism to diabetes. Functional medicine experts stress that autoimmune disease is not inevitable — rather, it results from systemic neglect of foundational health strategies. By prioritizing vitamin D replenishment, individuals can reclaim immune resilience and break the cycle of chronic illness. The solution lies not in passive acceptance but in proactive self-advocacy, demanding better public health policies and rejecting corporate-driven misinformation about sunlight and supplementation.
The vitamin D crisis is a preventable epidemic rooted in misinformation and profit-driven health policies. Autoimmune disorders, chronic inflammation, and rising disease burdens need not be inevitable — they reflect measurable nutritional gaps. Achieving widespread immune resilience requires rejecting fear-based narratives about sun exposure, embracing supplementation when necessary, and demanding transparency from industries that prioritize profits over health.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The Yellow Card scheme, used to monitor adverse drug reactions in the UK, flagged the potential GBS cases. While this system helps identify possible safety issues, it does not prove causality. Many GBS cases may be coincidental or triggered by infections rather than the vaccine itself.
Nevertheless, the alert underscores the importance of monitoring, transparency, and informed consent as new vaccines continue to roll out, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Meanwhile, the White House’s leveraging of “national security” to justify tariffs via Section 232 investigations has drawn scrutiny. Critics argue that weaponizing trade policy could destabilize global markets, particularly if trading partners retaliate. Australia’s Treasurer Jim Chalmers, reacting to Trump’s remarks, called the tariffs “very concerning,” vowing emergency talks to protect his nation’s $5 billion pharmaceutical exports to the U.S.
Trump’s tariff threats arrive amid broader economic turbulence. On Tuesday, he also unveiled a 50% tariff on copper imports in a move that sent commodity prices soaring and teased future levies on semiconductors. The administration’s aggressive trade policies, while popular with the GOP base, risk amplifying inflation and supply chain disruptions.
For now, the pharmaceutical industry remains in wait-and-see mode. Should Trump follow through, the fallout could redefine drug affordability and accessibility for millions. But as history shows, the president’s trade rhetoric doesn’t always match reality, leaving businesses and patients alike with plenty of uncertainty.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A Looming Collapse
Both Glidden and host Mike Adams warned that society faces collapse if this model continues: unsustainable healthcare costs (nearing 25% of GDP), cognitive decline from toxic exposures, and AI-driven medicine replacing mechanistic doctors. The solution? Grassroots education and “health freedom sanctuaries” to bypass FDA restrictions.
Watch the full episode of the "Health Ranger Report" with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and Dr. Peter Glidden as they reveal how allopathic medicine is killing Western civilization.
https://www.brighteon.com/23d87afd-42bf-48e9-97ad-77afbcedfe9c
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A crossroads for science and civilization
As synthetic biology accelerates, society faces a pivotal choice: advance cautiously or plunge into uncharted bioethical terrain. The scientists’ optimism about curing diseases clashes with fears of a brave new world where humanity’s very essence is manufactured. With each breakthrough, the proverbial Pandora’s box swings wider.
“It’s not just about science—it’s about what we value,” states ethicist Dr. Thomas. “If we lose our humanity in pursuit of perfection, what have we truly gained?” The clock is ticking, but so far, consensus on the costs—and morals—of synthetic life remains elusive.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Leading theories include:
• Diet: The widespread consumption of ultra-processed foods during the formative years of Gen X and millennials may have altered gut bacteria in ways that increase long-term cancer risk.
• Environmental toxins: Pesticides, plastics, and industrial chemicals—more prevalent in recent decades—have resulted in higher chemical exposure for younger generations.
• Chronic stress: The mental and emotional strain from social media, economic pressures, and modern lifestyles may suppress immune systems.
• Antibiotic overuse: Frequent childhood antibiotic use may have permanently disrupted gut microbiota critical for immune defense.
This troubling trend is not limited to appendix cancer. Dr. Holowatyj notes similar increases in colon, rectal, and stomach cancers among younger people, suggesting a generational vulnerability to digestive system cancers, likely driven by the same environmental and lifestyle factors.
With no current medical screening available for appendix cancer, prevention becomes critical. Experts recommend strategies to boost the body’s natural cancer defenses: adopting an anti-inflammatory diet rich in whole, organic foods, minimizing toxic exposures, managing stress effectively, and supporting detoxification and immune function through healthy lifestyle choices.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
ABC’s covert promotion of killer drug REMDESIVIR in TV show sparks legal firestorm
A high-stakes legal battle is unfolding as ABC and The Walt Disney Company, its parent, face explosive allegations of covertly promoting dangerous pharmaceuticals for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) through the fictional medical drama "Doctor Odyssey."
New York-based law firm Myer and Scher LLP recently issued a second cease-and-desist letter. The demand penned by Jamie Scher was written on behalf of aggrieved individuals nationwide.
The letter accused the network of deceptive advertising, failure to disclose risks and breaching ethical broadcasting standards. The scandal raises urgent questions about corporate accountability, media manipulation, and the deadly repercussions of unchecked pharmaceutical propaganda.
Scher's demand letter pointed to the pilot episode, where protagonist Dr. Bryce Barnes (played by Joshua Jackson) claims remdesivir saved his life after being "patient zero" in a New York City hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. Later, in Episode 12, the character enthusiastically distributes COVID-19 booster shots to colleagues, including a nurse who falsely assumes vaccination is necessary for her pregnancy. However, the claim directly contradicts established risks of fetal harm.
The show also depicts Paxlovid – Pfizer's controversial antiviral – as a cure for COVID-19 with no mention of its documented failure rates or side effects. The demand letter argues these portrayals violate Truth in Advertising laws, citing the Communications Act of 1934 that mandates broadcasters serve the public interest.
How TV shows secretly push Big Pharma's products
According to the demand letter, ABC and Disney received undisclosed payments from Gilead Sciences (the maker of remdesivir) and Pfizer – a claim the network denies.
Scher also asserted that the show deliberately circumvented disclaimers mandated by the Food and Drug Administration. "Your client does not disclose potential side effects or interactions or any warnings of the nonfictional drugs named on this television show. Nor does your client disclose the amount of money they received to name these drugs," she wrote.
Experts note parallels to past Big Pharma scandals, including the opioid crisis, where aggressive marketing obscured lethal risks. Simultaneously, Gilead faces its own reckoning.
A groundbreaking class-action lawsuit filed in September 2023 accuses the pharmaceutical giant of deceptive practices tied to remdesivir, including fraudulent promotion and negligence. Testimonials collected by the FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation reveal harrowing accounts of patients who suffered kidney failure, death or stillbirths after being administered the drug – often without informed consent.
The legal storm underscores a widening chasm between institutional healthcare narratives and mounting evidence of pharmaceutical misconduct. For victims, the fight extends beyond financial restitution. It's a demand for justice for lives lost to products falsely branded as "miracle cures."
Watch Gabor "Gabe" Zolna explaining how remdesivir kills by causing acute kidney failure in this video.
https://www.brighteon.com/571126ed-c9c9-4dcb-afc4-1e44122d3742
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia