16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
California FAILS federal program audit: More than half of COVID unemployment benefits are in question
California's state government has been found to be in noncompliance with the requirements of seven out of 22 federal programs, according to a recent audit by the state auditor. The audit, which highlights "pervasive" noncompliance in the unemployment benefits program, raises significant concerns about the state's ability to manage federal funds and could jeopardize essential federal funding.
Audit reveals widespread noncompliance
The audit, conducted by Deputy State Auditor Linus Li, concluded that California did not materially comply with the requirements for seven federal programs, including one where noncompliance was pervasive. The report states, "This report concludes that the State did not materially comply with certain requirements for seven of the 22 federal programs or clusters of programs (federal programs) MGO audited, including one program for which the noncompliance was pervasive."
The audit also noted that while the state complied with the remaining federal programs, it continues to experience deficiencies in its accounting and administrative practices, affecting its internal controls over compliance with federal requirements.
Unemployment benefits program under scrutiny
One of the most critical findings of the audit pertains to the state's unemployment benefits program. The report found that even in 2023, years after the state made 55 billion in fraudulent COVID lockdown?era benefits payments, the state likely made "potentially ineligible payments" of nearly 200 million. Of the 138 pandemic unemployment assistance claimants tested, 91, or 66%, had verification issues.
California State Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher criticized the administration, stating, "While Gavin Newsom chases the national spotlight, Californians are left with an administration that can’t accomplish the basic functions of government. The federal government is right to take a look at this spending and decide if it’s appropriate to keep throwing resources at an administration that treats it like Monopoly money."
Structural deficit and payroll tax hikes
The audit's findings are particularly concerning given the state's ongoing structural deficit in its unemployment fund. According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO), the state's unemployment fund runs a structural deficit of $2 billion per year, in addition to a $20 billion debt and $1 billion in annual interest payments to the federal government.
To address this deficit, the LAO has recommended a significant increase in payroll taxes. Currently, businesses pay 42 per employee making 46,800 or more per year. However, the LAO suggests that this amount would need to rise to $889.20, or over 21 times higher than the existing base payroll tax, to cover the state's insolvency.
Historical context and future implications
The audit's findings are not just a reflection of current administrative failures but also highlight a long-standing issue with California's management of federal funds. The state's unemployment benefits program has been a source of controversy since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with widespread reports of fraud and mismanagement.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
New study links mRNA vaccines to GENETIC CHANGES – and not the good kind
A groundbreaking peer-reviewed study has ignited a fierce debate over the long-term safety of mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines.
In a paper published in Molecular Systems Biology late last month, a team of 19 German scientists suggested that these vaccines may induce lasting genetic alterations that could potentially lead to cancer and autoimmune disorders.
According to the study, mRNA vaccines can alter the structure of histones – proteins that play a crucial role in organizing DNA within cells. Histones act like spools around which DNA is wound, and their modification can significantly affect gene expression.
The researchers identified a specific change known as "histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation" (H3K27ac), which was found to persist for several months after vaccination. This alteration is associated with the activation of genes that can promote inflammation and has been linked to various types of cancer, including leukemia and brain tumors.
According to journalist Alex Berenson, the study shows that "mRNA vaccines can modify human chromosomes in ways that are connected to the development of leukemia and brain tumors." This occurs because the vaccines "train" immune cells to maintain a pro-inflammatory state, which can lead to chronic inflammation and, potentially, the onset of disease.
Epigenetics, the study of changes in gene expression that do not involve alterations to the DNA sequence itself, is at the heart of this discussion. The mRNA vaccines induce epigenetic changes by causing chemical modifications to histone proteins. These changes can activate genes in ways that promote tumor growth and inflammation.
The researchers also found that the genetic alterations were not limited to the site of injection but were observed in monocytes, a type of white blood cell that circulates throughout the body. This suggests that the vaccines' effects may be systemic, potentially impacting multiple organ systems.
Parallels with other studies
The findings of this German study align with those of other recent research. A Chinese study published earlier this year highlighted the potential of H3K27ac as a therapeutic target in cancer, while a Polish study linked H3K27ac alterations to leukemia and brain tumors. These studies collectively underscore the need for a deeper understanding of the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines.
The study has prompted renewed calls for the suspension or withdrawal of mRNA vaccines. A petition filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration earlier this year by a group of scientists argues that the vaccines are unapproved gene therapies and contain potentially harmful levels of DNA plasmids. The petition cites evidence from multiple studies, including the German paper, to support its claims.
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently announced the creation of a new sub-agency within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention dedicated to addressing vaccine injuries. This move reflects growing concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and the need for more comprehensive monitoring and research.
The emergence of post-vaccination syndrome (PVS), a condition characterized by chronic symptoms such as fatigue, brain fog and dizziness, has raised additional questions about the vaccines' safety.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Though the earth’s temperature is the lowest it’s been for 485 million years, the Vaccine Industrial Complex says the science is settled about global warming, so go to the nearest Walmart and get your Climate Change Prevention Jab to save the world from bursting into flames next week. It’s your civic duty. Follow the science, folks, and it leads you straight to an early grave, while the doctors all profit heavily from putting the climate emergency ahead of your medical needs.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
New Zealand approves risky weight-loss drug Wegovy despite alarming health risks abroad
In a move that has drawn sharp criticism from health experts, New Zealand’s government has approved the weight-loss drug Wegovy despite mounting evidence linking it to severe side effects, including pancreatitis, kidney disease, and even blindness. Associate Health Minister David Seymour has enthusiastically branded the drug a “game changer,” ignoring warnings from international studies and rising hospitalizations overseas. The decision raises serious questions about whether corporate interests are trumping public safety in New Zealand’s healthcare policies.
A dangerous trend in medical oversight
The approval comes as the government pushes the controversial Gene Technology Bill, which would fast-track the approval of drugs cleared in just two overseas jurisdictions. Critics warn this will strip away vital safeguards, leaving New Zealanders vulnerable to poorly tested medications. Meanwhile, obesity rates — fueled by processed foods and poor dietary habits — continue to climb. Instead of addressing root causes through nutrition, exercise, and traditional health practices, officials are betting on risky pharmaceutical solutions that could do more harm than good.
New Zealand’s approval of Wegovy flies in the face of alarming research. A 2025 Washington University study published in Nature Medicine examined 215,000 users of weight-loss injectables like Wegovy, Ozempic, and Mounjaro. The findings were damning: patients faced double the risk of pancreatitis, an 11% higher likelihood of arthritis, and increased threats of kidney disease and dangerously low blood pressure.
Worse yet, a JAMA Ophthalmology study linked these drugs to vision loss and blindness, with patients reporting irreversible damage. In the UK, hospitalizations tied to weight-loss drug complications surged by 46% in just one month, per the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
Yet, when questioned by the NZ Herald, David Seymour dismissed these concerns, calling Wegovy’s approval “very exciting” and claiming it will “save our health system money” by preventing hospital visits—a claim directly contradicted by real-world data.
The Gene Technology Bill: A corporate handout disguised as reform
Seymour’s push for automatic drug approvals under the Gene Technology Bill only deepens the recklessness. If passed, medications cleared in just two overseas markets would bypass rigorous local scrutiny — effectively outsourcing New Zealand’s safety standards to foreign regulators with possible conflicts of interest.
The bill also fails to regulate genetically modified foods, leaving consumers in the dark about what they eat despite studies linking industrial food production to rising obesity since 2000.
The real solutions being ignored
While Seymour touts Wegovy as a miracle fix, experts argue that obesity requires holistic solutions, not just chemical interventions. Processed foods, sedentary lifestyles, and corporate agriculture policies have created a public health crisis, yet the government refuses to tackle these issues head-on.
Natural approaches such as better nutrition, exercise, and community-based wellness programs are being sidelined in favor of Big Pharma’s latest profit driver.
New Zealanders deserve a healthcare system that prioritizes safety, transparency, and real solutions — not reckless deregulation and unchecked corporate influence. The approval of Wegovy and the looming Gene Technology Bill represent a dangerous shift toward profit-driven policymaking, with little regard for long-term consequences.
Instead of gambling with citizens’ health, the government should invest in preventative care, clean eating initiatives, and policies that empower its people rather than endangering them. Until then, Seymour’s so-called “game changer” may prove to be just another losing bet for New Zealand.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Thimerosal is 50 percent MERCURY and NO it has NOT been removed from vaccines – that was a BIG FAT LIE the CDC told vax skeptics to keep them vaxxed up and dying
1 Decades of Misinformation: The U.S. government and health agencies (CDC, FDA, AAP) falsely claimed thimerosal—a mercury-based vaccine preservative—was removed from childhood vaccines, despite evidence showing it remains in some (e.g., flu shots, tetanus vaccines).
2 Hidden Research & Suppressed Science: Internal documents (e.g., 2000 Simpsonwood meeting transcripts) reveal officials acknowledged thimerosal’s neurotoxic risks and possible links to autism but actively suppressed findings and manipulated study language to downplay dangers.
3 Scientific Manipulation: The CDC and industry-funded studies obscured early research (e.g., Verstraeten’s 1999/2004 data, IOM’s 2001 report) that found thimerosal exposure correlated with developmental disorders, later dismissing further research via a 2004 IOM reversal.
4 Ongoing Use & Deceptive Labeling: Despite public assurances, thimerosal persists in vaccines, often concealed by misleading “thimerosal-free” labels for trace amounts. A 2023 review cited 165+ studies confirming its harms, contradicting official narratives.
First off, mercury in any amount is highly toxic to humans, whether consumed, breathed in, or injected. It doesn’t matter if it’s ethyl mercury or methyl mercury, so don’t fall for that misinformation either. When natural health advocates began blowing the whistle on the dangers of mercury in vaccines, the CDC had to run cover, so they renamed it “thimerosal,” which is made up of 50 percent mercury. Then they lied to Americans who had become concerned with the dangers of injecting mercury into their body and said that NO MORE vaccines contain mercury. It was a lie, but most vaxxers are too dumbed-down to Google “thimerosal” and find out.
This has gone on for twenty years. Mercury is still in the multi-dose flu shots, TDaP, tetanus shots, and several other injections, and at VERY HIGH DOSES. In fact, most influenza vaccines contain 25,000 times the amount of mercury that the EPA warns about in tap water and fish. Oops. Yes, the Health Ranger ran lab tests on those and blew the whistle. Remember?
Mercury in vaccines is deadly and Pharma has known it forever, that’s why they’re called dirty jabs
Mercury is used as a preservative in the multi-dose flu shots because it saves pharma money and makes children sick, including causing autism, which is one of the biggest cash cows of the sick care industrial complex. Since the flu shot needle goes in and out of the same vial of deadly live virus concoction, something has to be used to kill the germs and preserve the virus so it can infect children. That’s mercury, or wait, “thimerosal.”
Yes, in fact, the CDC website states: “Fact: Thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in the United States in 2001.” Can you sue them for false information and mass killing? No. You can’t. The FDA’s “Modernization Act” from 1997 dictated that mercury must be removed from vaccines, but that was a lie also.
Got mercury poisoning? Got autism? Got Mad Hatter Syndrome? Check those vaccine ingredients for Thimerosal, if you can still read without getting a migraine headache and having a nervous breakdown.
CHOP, also known as the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, is home to the guy who invented the Rotavirus jab that contains a deadly wild pig virus that causes a child’s intestines to become entangled. The CHOP website also claims thimerosal was removed from vaccines, but it never was. Just call Paul Offit and ask him. He made millions of dollars helping design vaccines that make kids deathly sick for profit.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
HHS announces new CDC sub-agency focused on vaccine injuries
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is establishing a new sub-agency under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) dedicated to researching and addressing vaccine-related injuries.
In an interview on NewsNation with Chris Cuomo on March 27, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. revealed that the new agency will prioritize investigating adverse effects linked to vaccinations, as well as conditions such as long COVID and Lyme disease.
"That's going to be one of our priority focuses," Kennedy said. "We already have a division at [the National Institutes of Health] that is devoted to studying long COVID and to figuring out cures… and we're incorporating an agency within CDC that is going to specialize in vaccine injuries."
Kennedy emphasized the growing need for transparency and rigorous scientific review to ensure public trust in medical interventions.
"These are priorities for the American people. More and more people are suffering from these injuries, and we are committed to having gold-standard science to make sure that we can figure out what the treatments are and that we can deliver the best treatments possible to the American people," he added.
The new unit will work alongside his proposed vaccine adverse event reporting system, which he claims will be "more accurate" than the existing Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
New HHS vaccine safety sub-agency praised by advocates, scientists
Medical researchers, advocates and critics of federal vaccine policy hail the new HHS vaccine safety sub-agency as a critical, if overdue, step toward accountability.
Among them is Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for Children's Health Defense, who called the move "excellent" but lamented systemic failures in data transparency. James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., a research scientist and author, described the announcement as a "historic and long-overdue shift in public health accountability."
"For decades, families of the vaccine-injured have been subjected to silence, stonewalling and denial by the very institutions tasked with ensuring safety," Lyons-Weiler said. "This new development is without question a step in the right direction."
Christina Parks, Ph.D., a biologist who has studied vaccine injuries, said the sub-agency "will legitimize the suffering of millions of Americans and people around the world who have endured the agonizing effects of vaccine injury."
Ben Tapper, a Nebraska chiropractor who was labeled part of the "Disinformation Dozen" by the Center for Countering Digital Hate for his criticism of COVID-19 vaccines, called the news "a long-overdue crack in the dam."
"For decades, we've been shouting on the rooftops, parents, researchers and victims alike, about the real harm these shots can cause, only to be dismissed as conspiracy nuts or told the science is 'settled.' The data's been there: VAERS reports, court payouts from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and countless studies buried or ignored by the mainstream. Now, they can't pretend it's not happening anymore."
Meanwhile, Sayer Ji, co-founder of Stand for Health Freedom, framed the move as an implicit admission of failure.
"That HHS departments were selling patient data and operating in silos reveals a cartel, not a public health institution. This is not reform, it's rupture. And it opens the door to a new era of truth, accountability and bodily sovereignty."
Watch this video about RFK Jr. promising to address the existential threat of chronic disease.
https://www.brighteon.com/8f3a0ef8-cccf-46f9-9da4-ba710ceb329e
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
CLOT SHOT PLANDEMIC UNFOLDING: Fibrous, rubbery clots caused by covid injections have prion-like seeding activity
According to the CDC, every vaccine ever created is always exactly 95 percent “safe and effective,” give or take one to two percent. That’s the narrative, even when they run ZERO clinical trials on humans, they still spew out the same, tired lie. Got mRNA clot shot syndrome? That’s because mRNA is 95 percent effective at wrecking human health, including by creating rubbery vascular clots when the amyloid protein prions join together inside the blood. Follow the scientific bouncing ball.
Throughout the past year, embalmers around the world are finding fibrous, rubbery clots in at least a fourth of the autopsies of Covid-injected humans
Oh the mystery. Embalmers just can’t seem to figure out what these long, crazy-looking, rubbery clots are that entirely clog human arteries and veins are. Where on earth could they be coming from? No embalmers ever found them before the pandemic (clot shots) started, so could it be the flu? Of course, if anyone blames the mRNA injections, they might end up suicided (two bullets to the back of the head labeled as “suicide”) by the Vaccine Industrial Complex of insidious genocidal maniacs.
It must be Covid, right? Side effects of the flu include fever, chills, achy muscles, nagging cough, and wait for it… wait for it… long rubbery vascular clots that look like a surgeon inserted an extension cord into a human artery and left it there for the patient to die. Scientists and embalmers are studying these extension-cord looking rubbery clots and finding amyloid proteins in them that are caused by “phosphorylation” induced by mRNA spike PRION proteins clotting together. Yes, that’s what’s happening, folks.
The fibrous clots test positive for prion-like seeding activity, meaning the covid injections result in prion clots that form in the blood vessels, 1,000 times worse than a tiny blood clot that could already be deadly enough to cause a stroke, heart attack or brain aneurism. The discoveries include a subset of amyloid proteins called “prions” which cause neurovascular or neurodegenerative disorders, including Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (“CKD”), Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s-like dementia.
All three ICP-MS analyses conducted revealed the white fibrous clots contain extremely high amounts of phosphorus, sulphur and sometimes tin. For example, the concentration of phosphorus in normal blood is between 100 and 1,000ppm, yet in the white fibrous clot samples, phosphorus was measured at 5,000ppm. These abnormally high amount of phosphorus in the white fibrous clots are largely responsible for why the clots are forming. Think Bill Depop Gates, Wicked Walenski and Freakshow Fauci know this? Of course they do.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Trump administration SUSPENDS federal grants to Princeton University amid antisemitism probe
The Trump administration has suspended dozens of federal research grants to Princeton University in New Jersey, escalating its crackdown on Ivy League institutions under investigation for alleged antisemitism.
Princeton President Christopher Eisgruber confirmed the freeze, revealing that agencies including the Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Department of Defense halted funding for multiple research projects. While the administration has not provided detailed reasoning, the move aligns with a broader federal campaign targeting elite universities over campus discrimination complaints.
Princeton now joins Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University in facing federal funding suspensions tied to antisemitism investigations. Eisgruber pledged cooperation with government inquiries but vowed to defend academic freedom.
"We are committed to fighting antisemitism and all forms of discrimination, and we will cooperate with the government in combating antisemitism," he wrote in a campus-wide email sent Tuesday, April 1. "Princeton will also vigorously defend academic freedom and the due process rights of this university."
The suspensions follow a March warning from the Department of Education to 60 universities, threatening enforcement actions if they failed to address alleged anti-Jewish bias. Princeton had already been under federal investigation since April 2024.
The probe was initiated after Zachary Marschall, editor-in-chief of Campus Reform, filed a complaint citing a pro-Palestinian protest at Princeton where chants such as "Intifada" were heard. Marschall accused the university of ignoring what he called antisemitic rhetoric.
From protests to punishment: The high-stakes battle over campus speech
The second Trump administration's aggressive stance reflects President Donald Trump's repeated vows to combat campus antisemitism, which he has linked to pro-Palestinian activism. Federal officials have characterized some student demonstrators as "pro-Hamas," while activists insist their protests target Israeli military actions, not Jewish people. The administration has also deported foreign students tied to protests and intensified scrutiny of Middle East studies programs.
Princeton, with a $34 billion endowment, received $456 million in federal grants last year – making the suspensions a significant financial blow. The Anti-Defamation League previously gave the university an "F" grade for its handling of antisemitism.
Meanwhile, Columbia recently agreed to federal demands – including revising disciplinary policies and its Middle East curriculum – to restore $400 million in frozen funds. Over in Massachusetts, Harvard now faces an audit of $8.7 billion in grants by a federal antisemitism task force.
Eisgruber, a vocal critic of the administration's tactics, previously condemned the Columbia sanctions as a "radical threat to scholarly excellence" in an essay published last month in The Atlantic magazine. He likened the current climate to the Red Scare of the 1950s, warning of eroding academic freedoms.
The administration is leveraging Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which bars federal funding to institutions that enable discrimination based on religion or national origin. While Princeton has not been formally accused of violating the law, the suspensions signal a hardline approach that could reshape campus speech policies nationwide.
Watch this clip about colleges facing backlash and potentially losing funding over allegations of antisemitism on campus.
https://www.brighteon.com/a3599a90-d301-4398-83a9-e6e0d774f863
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Defunding DEADLY mRNA jabs: Government funding for mRNA technology being scrutinized and sidelined until proven “safe and effective” for real
Funding Uncertainty for mRNA Research - Federal support for mRNA technology is under scrutiny, with NIH officials reportedly advising scientists to omit "mRNA" from grant applications, despite a $47 billion research budget.
Scientists Warn of Consequences - Nobel laureate Drew Weissman and others argue that cutting NIH support would stall progress, drive young researchers abroad, and disrupt decades of public research underpinning medical advances.
Political Forces - Under RFK Jr.’s HHS leadership — millions of lives could be saved by pulling deadly mRNA vaccines off the market until proven safe
Lies, lies, and more lies. That’s what the American people received from the CDC, FDA and Vaccine Industrial Complex about the mRNA “technology” used for Covid jabs. First, we were all told that the spike proteins would only be produced in the body for a few days, until the immune system could recognize them and build up antibodies to protect against the “novel” gain-of-function Fauci Flu. That was a bold-faced lie. The spike prions keep getting churned out by tricked and genetically modified cells forever. Follow the science on that to find out.
Next, we were all lied to about mRNA not leaving the site of the injection. The spike proteins travel throughout the vascular system and can join together using light technology, so they were right about “technology” but Bill Gates must have forgot to describe how the nanoparticles create rubbery clots that catapult cancer, heart disease, infertility and dementia. Just a sordid little detail he left out while pushing the toxic jabs vehemently on the world.
National Institutes of Health won’t clarify HOW it’s using nearly $50 billion of research budget because they are nefarious and corrupt to the core
If an agency has a three-letter abbreviation, chances are they are in the business of making humans sick for profits. Look no further than the National Institutes of Harm (NIH) for a great example of that. There will be no mRNA vaccine for pancreatic cancer, unless of course they are talking about the Covid jab causing pancreatic cancer because spike proteins lodge in the pancreas, and then cancer cells use those prions as a catapult and grow there, causing the organ to fail. Since you can’t live without your pancreas, that’s another vector for Big Pharma’s main goal of population reduction via dirty injections.
According to whistleblowers, NIH officials are secretly now REMOVING REFERENCES to mRNA from their grant applications because they are being scrutinized, especially since mRNA is turning out to be a global disaster of genocidal proportions.
Cutting vaccine funding could save millions of lives and spare millions of children from neurological and social disorders like autism, Asperger’s, asthma, severe allergies, digestive issues, and childhood cancer. It’s time to recall every single vaccine out there and run some in-depth, real science tests with independent labs in charge that aren’t funded and controlled by Big Pharma or the vaccine manufacturers themselves. No more wolves guarding the sheep. How dumb and careless this has been for decades.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Former CDC Director advocates for additional MMR dose for babies, going against decades of vaccine safety recommendations
The push for an extra MMR dose
Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky called for an additional MMR dose for infants aged 6-11 months, particularly in areas experiencing measles outbreaks. Walensky and her colleagues have argued in op-eds published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and STAT News that the current immunization guidelines should be revised. They propose that infants traveling to regions with a higher probability of measles exposure, whether domestically or internationally, should receive an extra MMR dose between the ages of 6-11 months. This recommendation is based on the uptick in measles cases in the United States.
Several infectious disease experts, including Dr. Mary Caserta, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at the University of Rochester Medical Center, agree with Walensky's proposal. Caserta stated, "If we have data showing that there’s an increased risk of measles in the United States, I’m definitely in favor of reviewing our immunization guidelines to see what we can do to best protect our children."
However, the push for an additional MMR dose for young babies raises significant concerns, particularly regarding the lack of safety data. Heather Ray, a science and research analyst with Children’s Health Defense (CHD), pointed out that "many people assume the MMR vaccine is safer than the measles, mumps and rubella infections," but there are "serious red flags regarding the safety and research behind the vaccine."
Safety concerns and adverse events
The MMR vaccine has been associated with a range of adverse events, including febrile seizures, anaphylaxis, meningitis, encephalitis, thrombocytopenia, arthralgia, and vasculitis. According to documents released by Physicians for Informed Consent, the risk of permanent disability or death from the MMR vaccine may be greater than the risk posed by the diseases it aims to prevent. This is due to the fact that vaccine safety studies have not been conducted on a large enough scale.
Ray highlighted that the risk of serious adverse events following MMR vaccination is "concerning" and noted that "only a small percentage" of these events are reported in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). As of the end of January, there have been 41 deaths reported in VAERS following MMR or MMRV vaccination since 2015.
In fact, Walensky's recommendation comes on the heels of a suspected measles case in a 1-year-old child from Pima County, Arizona, that was revealed to be a reaction to the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, not an actual case of measles. This "rare" reaction would likely become more commonplace if MMR vaccines were given to infants younger than one year of age, as this has never been recommended due to the vaccine's risk of adverse events in babies with underdeveloped immune systems and low blood volume/body weight.
The mischaracterization of vaccine reactions
The case in Arizona highlights a troubling trend: the mischaracterization of vaccine reactions as measles cases. The Pima County Health Department acknowledged that reactions to the MMR vaccine are "rare and do not carry the same risk as community-acquired measles." However, the lack of clarity on the toddler's symptoms and the precautionary measures taken by health authorities suggest a potential overreaction to vaccine reactions.
Karl Jablonowski, a senior research scientist with CHD, criticized the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule as "aggressive — some would find it reckless." He emphasized that the recommendation against administering the live-virus MMR vaccine before 12 months of age is not a coincidence. "MMR is not recommended for younger than 12 months old because even the vaccine-zealous recommenders do not find the risks appropriate," Jablonowski said.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
COVID mRNA injections linked to genetic changes that increase brain tumor and leukemia risk
A groundbreaking study published in Molecular Systems Biology has uncovered alarming evidence that mRNA COVID-19 injections may cause persistent genetic changes linked to cancer and autoimmune diseases. The research, conducted by a team of 19 German scientists, found that the vaccines alter histone structures — key components of chromosomes — potentially leading to uncontrolled cell growth and chronic inflammation. This is explained in greater detail in the study, Role of Histone Post-Translational Modifications in Inflammatory Diseases.
The findings add fuel to an already raging debate over the long-term safety of mRNA technology, with experts warning that these genetic modifications could explain the surge in post-vaccine inflammatory conditions and cancer diagnoses worldwide.
Key findings from the original study
The study demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce long-lasting epigenetic modifications in monocyte-derived macrophages, characterized by persistent H3K27ac marks at promoter regions. These changes are associated with:
1. Trained Innate Immunity – Enhanced pro-inflammatory cytokine responses (IL-1?, TNF-?, CCL3, CCL20) upon stimulation with pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs).
2. Epigenetic Memory – H3K27ac enrichment at promoters of immune-related genes persists for at least six months after vaccination.
3. Dynamic Reprogramming – A prime-boost regimen (two initial doses + booster) is required for sustained epigenetic alterations.
4. G-Quadruplex DNA Involvement – H3K27ac is linked to G4 DNA structures, which regulate chromatin accessibility and transcription factor binding.
Mechanisms linking mRNA vaccination to leukemia and brain tumors
While the study does not directly investigate cancer risks, the observed epigenetic reprogramming raises plausible concerns regarding long-term genomic instability:
Leukemia Risk (Epigenetic Dysregulation in Hematopoietic Stem Cells)
• H3K27ac alterations in myeloid progenitors – The study suggests that epigenetic memory extends to bone marrow progenitor cells, which could affect hematopoiesis.
• Prolonged pro-inflammatory signaling – Chronic IL-1? and TNF-? secretion may promote clonal expansion of pre-leukemic cells (e.g., through NF-?B activation).
• G4 DNA instability – G-quadruplexes are enriched in oncogene promoters (MYC, BCL2, KRAS) and telomeres. Disruption of G4 stability by persistent H3K27ac could lead to chromosomal translocations (e.g., BCR-ABL in CML).
Brain Tumor Risk (Microglial Activation & Neuroinflammation)
• Trained microglia (brain-resident macrophages) – If similar epigenetic reprogramming occurs in microglia, chronic inflammation could promote glioblastoma progression (IL-1? is known to support tumor microenvironment).
• Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption – Pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-?, CCL20) may increase BBB permeability, facilitating oncogenic viral entry (e.g., EBV, CMV) or metastasis seeding.
It's now clear: mRNA vaccines trigger epigenetic changes tied to cancer
The study focused on macrophages, immune cells that circulate in the blood, and found that mRNA vaccines induced a specific histone modification known as H3K27ac. This alteration, which persisted for months after vaccination, has been previously associated with leukaemia, gliomas (brain tumours), and autoimmune disorders.
“When histones are disrupted, cells process DNA more aggressively, which can lead to tumour formation,” explained journalist Alex Berenson, who has extensively covered vaccine risks. The researchers also suggested these changes could extend to bone marrow cells, where leukaemia originates—a finding that may explain the spike in leukaemia cases in heavily vaccinated Japan.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden drops bombshells about children being permanently damaged by mRNA jabs during Tucker Carlson interview
Babies being destroyed by COVID jabs in 2025
In a chilling revelation that has left many Americans questioning the safety and necessity of COVID-19 vaccines, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden recently appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show to discuss the alarming number of adverse events reported following vaccination. The conversation, which left Carlson visibly shaken, highlighted the stark disconnect between the data and the continued push to vaccinate children, even as evidence of potential harm mounts.
Before her appearance on Carlson’s show, Dr. Bowden, a Texas-based ENT specialist, had already made a name for herself in the medical freedom movement. Her outspoken criticism of vaccine mandates and her advocacy for early treatment options like ivermectin have earned her both praise and criticism. Despite facing backlash, including a suspension from Houston Methodist Hospital for challenging the prevailing COVID narrative, Dr. Bowden has remained steadfast in her commitment to the Hippocratic Oath. She has successfully treated over 6,000 COVID patients without a single death, a testament to her dedication and expertise.
During the interview, Dr. Bowden pointed to data from the CDC’s VAERS system, which has recorded over 38,000 deaths following the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Under normal circumstances, such a figure would have prompted the FDA to pull the shots from the market. Instead, the agency has pushed forward, adding the COVID vaccine to the routine childhood schedule. This decision is particularly concerning given that the vaccines are still under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for children under 12 and have not yet received full FDA approval.
Dr. Bowden’s revelation that 9 million American children have received the latest version of these COVID shots was met with disbelief by Carlson. “Actually?” he asked, clearly caught off guard. “Yes,” Bowden confirmed. “Still?” he pressed. “Yes. Yes. 9 million [kids]—12% [of US children have been injected].” The conversation took a darker turn when Carlson asked about the potential long-term consequences of these shots.
The long-term health implications are serious
Dr. Bowden expressed deep concern about the potential for increased cancer rates and other serious health issues in young people. “I don’t see a ton of cancer in my practice,” she said, “but I do have friends at MD Anderson, and they said they’ve never seen anything like it. The young people coming in with very advanced tumors, I think that’s what we have to be worried about now.” She explained that while it is difficult to get up-to-date cancer data, anecdotal reports are piling up, painting a troubling picture.
The lack of transparency and access to comprehensive data on the long-term effects of COVID vaccines is a significant issue. Dr. Bowden noted that while there may be people who have access to this data, it is not readily available to the public. This raises profound questions about accountability and the decision-making process that has led to the widespread vaccination of children with products that have not yet been fully approved.
A call for accountability
The interview between Dr. Bowden and Tucker Carlson has sparked a much-needed conversation about the safety and necessity of COVID vaccines for children. The fact that 9 million children have been injected with a vaccine that is still under EUA is alarming, especially given the reported adverse events and the lack of long-term data on its safety.
As a society, we must ask ourselves: What have we done? In our rush to vaccinate every man, woman, and child, have we compromised the long-term health of a population that never needed these shots in the first place? What data was ignored, and who made the decisions to ignore that data? These are questions that demand answers.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
The smallpox vaccine was not a medical miracle – its history was marred by scandals
The questionable legacy of the smallpox vaccine
In the annals of medical history, few debates have been as contentious as the one surrounding the smallpox vaccine. In 1868, Dr. Charles T. Pearce, an English physician and early opponent of mandatory vaccination, published a 120-page essay titled "Vaccination: its tested effects on health, mortality, and population." This essay, available in the Wellcome Collection, offers a damning critique of the smallpox vaccine, questioning its efficacy, safety, and ethical implications. Pearce's arguments, rooted in meticulous observation and data analysis, resonate with contemporary skepticism towards vaccines, particularly in light of the COVID-19 scandal.
Pearce's skepticism towards the smallpox vaccine stemmed from his observations of high mortality rates among vaccinated individuals. He noted that "a great number [of vaccinated people] being cut-off in the flower of their age, while those, belonging to the same families, having had small-pox arrived at maturity." This observation led him to conclude that vaccination, while potentially preventing smallpox, increased the risk of death from other diseases.
Pearce's concerns were not unfounded. He highlighted the case of Jenner's own son, who died of tuberculosis (then known as consumption) after being vaccinated. "It is a remarkable fact that Jenner’s first child, his eldest son, on whom he experimented, died subsequently of consumption," Pearce wrote. He also pointed out that "another of his subjects, the man Phipps, whom Jenner vaccinated, also died of consumption."
Pearce's investigations led him to believe that the smallpox vaccine was not only ineffective but also dangerous. He argued that the lymph used in the vaccine, transferred from person to person, was often contaminated. "The puling, sickly infants, the offspring of the debauched, the diseased, of the ill-fed and ill-clad poor of London, who are brought in crowds to the public vaccinator to receive a blessing," he wrote, "are too often, instead of a blessing, the recipients of the seeds of disease and of premature death."
Compulsory vaccination was a public health disaster back then, too
Pearce's critique extended to the compulsory vaccination policies of his time. He argued that these policies were not only ethically questionable but also detrimental to public health. "Since the Compulsory Vaccination Act came into force [in 1853] there has been an excess of 254,000 in infant mortality in seven years," he wrote. This alarming statistic suggested that compulsory vaccination was doing more harm than good.
Furthermore, Pearce noted a significant increase in deaths from measles and scarlet fever following the introduction of compulsory vaccination. He presented data from the Registrar General’s Report, 1865, showing a rise in annual deaths per million from these diseases. "In the years 1850-1854, annual deaths were 1,296.8 per million, rising to 1,515.6 during 1855-1859 and rising yet again to 1,668.0 for the years 1860-1864," he wrote.
Pearce's findings raise important questions about the unintended consequences of mass vaccination campaigns. His work suggests that the focus on eradicating one disease may have inadvertently exacerbated others, a concern that remains relevant today.
History repeating itself
The parallels between the smallpox vaccine controversy and the COVID-19 scandal are striking. Both situations involve widespread vaccination campaigns, government mandates, and significant public resistance. Pearce's criticisms of the smallpox vaccine echo the concerns of many who question the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
The dark legacy of the U.S. government’s UNETHICAL medical and military research
The history of medical and military research in the U.S. is marred by a series of unethical experiments conducted on unwitting human subjects. From secret radiation exposure to biological warfare tests on civilian populations, these disturbing experiments reveal a pattern of disregard for human rights in the name of scientific advancement and national security.
Early experiments: Cancer, syphilis and malaria
In 1931, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations conducted experiments in which human subjects were deliberately infected with cancer cells – without their knowledge or consent. Around the same time, Dr. Cornelius Rhoads, under the auspices of government and civilian hospitals, began exposing patients to high doses of radiation to study its effects. Rhoads later became a key figure in the U.S. biological weapons program.
One of the most infamous cases of unethical medical research was the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, which began in 1932. The U.S. Public Health Service recruited 600 African American men, 200 of whom had syphilis, under the false promise of free medical care.
Researchers withheld treatment – even after penicillin became the standard cure in the 1940s – to observe the disease's progression. The study continued for 40 years, only ending in 1972 after public outcry.
In 1940, 400 prisoners in Chicago were infected with malaria to test experimental drugs. These inmates were subjected to painful symptoms without proper medical oversight, highlighting the exploitation of vulnerable populations in medical research.
Biological and chemical warfare testing on civilians
Between 1949 and 1969, the U.S. military and intelligence agencies conducted secret biological warfare tests in at least 239 populated areas – including New York City (NYC); Washington, D.C.; San Francisco; and St. Louis. These experiments involved releasing harmful bacteria and chemical agents into the air to study their dispersal patterns.
One of the most alarming incidents occurred in September 1950, when the U.S. Navy released Serratia marcescens, a potentially pathogenic bacterium, off the coast of San Francisco. The bacteria spread through the city, leading to multiple infections and at least one death.
During the 1950s and 1960s, the U.S. Army and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) conducted aerosol dispersion tests using the toxic compound zinc cadmium sulfide over populated areas in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. In 1953, 36 tests were performed on citizens of Winnipeg in Canada's Manitoba province, where the chemical was sprayed to assess its potential to induce cancer.
Military experiments on public spaces
The Vietnam War era saw some of the most brazen biological experiments. In one instance, the U.S. Army sprayed a bacterial mist at unsuspecting travelers in Washington, D.C.'s Ronald Reagan National Airport to test the effectiveness of biological agents in crowded spaces.
Government scientists also placed Bacillus globigii, a bacterium linked to food poisoning and infections, inside light bulbs and dropped them into the NYC and Chicago subway systems. The goal was to study how pathogens could spread in urban environments – without informing the public of the risks. The military also tested B. globigii in Hawaii, deploying it from a submarine into the port of Oahu to simulate a biological attack on a naval base.
In another shocking case, the U.S. military and the CIA released dengue fever-carrying mosquitoes in Georgia and Florida, leading to outbreaks of the debilitating disease. Similar tests were conducted in Puerto Rico, where civilians were exposed to biological agents without their knowledge.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A 2023 preprint study detected levels of synthetic DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots that were 18 to 70 times above regulatory limits. Similarly, a December 2024 peer-reviewed study supervised by FDA scientists found synthetic DNA contamination levels in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines that were 6 to 470 times above regulatory limits.
These revelations have prompted a reevaluation of the regulatory framework surrounding mRNA vaccines. Last week, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the creation of a sub-agency within the CDC dedicated to investigating vaccine injuries, a move that underscores the growing recognition of the potential risks associated with these vaccines.
The history of vaccine development is fraught with challenges and controversies. The rapid development and deployment of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 scandal, while hailed as a scientific triumph, have also raised ethical and safety concerns. The rush to vaccinate the global population has outpaced the traditional safeguards of long-term safety studies, leaving many unanswered questions about the long-term effects of these vaccines.
Jablonowski expressed his dismay at the findings, stating that the "unintended reprogramming of progenitor cells" is not something to be celebrated but feared. "With every advancement in knowledge of the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, we are again reminded of our own complacency about the blinded rush to push these products into every American," he lamented.
As the debate over mRNA vaccines continues, the question of trust in regulatory bodies and scientific institutions looms large. The findings of this study, and the subsequent calls for suspension or withdrawal of the vaccines, highlight the need for transparency, rigorous safety testing, and ethical considerations in the development and deployment of medical technologies.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Researchers from Yale University are currently investigating PVS, hoping to identify immunological patterns that could explain the condition. Their work, though preliminary, offers a glimmer of hope for those suffering from PVS and underscores the need for continued research into the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines.
The German study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that mRNA vaccines may have unintended genetic consequences. The findings highlight the importance of rigorous, long-term safety monitoring and the need for further research to fully understand the implications of these genetic changes.
Watch Dr. Robert Malone warning that vaccine developers will never stop circumventing people's free will in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/2f8b3902-27dd-4866-a2e0-0c8c8cfe7806
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Texas child’s “measles pulmonary failure” sparks debate as media ignores vaccine risks and medical errors
The hidden side of measles hysteria
When 8-year-old Daisy Hildebrand died in April from what Texas health officials labeled "measles pulmonary failure," mainstream outlets like CNN and The Washington Post rushed to frame the tragedy as a cautionary tale about vaccine hesitancy. Missing from the headlines? The hospital’s refusal to disclose Daisy’s treatment protocol—or whether medical negligence played a role.
This pattern is nothing new. Every measles-related death becomes a media spectacle, while the thousands of annual MMR vaccine injuries—seizures, autism, and even fatalities—are buried by the same outlets. In February, another Texas child, a 6-year-old, died after measles led to pneumonia. But when Children’s Health Defense (CHD) obtained her medical records, renowned pulmonologist Dr. Pierre Kory concluded she died from medical errors, including delayed antibiotic treatment. The New York Times dismissed the claim as "unfounded," omitting Kory’s credentials—a glaring omission in what should be objective journalism.
Vaccine risks vs. measles: A distorted narrative
While the mainstream media and health authorities emphasize the importance of vaccination, they often fail to disclose the serious risks associated with the MMR vaccine. The vaccine, which protects against measles, mumps, and rubella, has been linked to a range of adverse reactions, including febrile seizures, anaphylaxis, meningitis, encephalitis, thrombocytopenia, arthralgia, and vasculitis. According to the package insert for Merck’s MMRII, the vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
Research by Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) reveals that immunity from the MMR vaccine wanes over time, with about 60% of vaccinated children susceptible to sub-clinical measles infection and 33% of adults susceptible to clinical infection by age 24-26. This waning immunity suggests that the vaccine may not provide the long-term protection it is often touted to offer.
Moreover, a 2004 study found that boys vaccinated with their first MMR dose on time were 67% more likely to be diagnosed with autism compared to those vaccinated after their third birthday. Between 2000 and 2024, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) recorded 144 deaths following MMR or MMRV vaccination, compared to nine measles-related deaths reported to the CDC during the same period. Given that VAERS is a passive reporting system, the actual number of vaccine-related injuries and deaths may be significantly higher.
Meanwhile, measles itself confers lifelong natural immunity—something the MMR can’t replicate. Yet public health officials never mention this. Instead, they push mass vaccination while ignoring troubling financial ties: Merck made 2.485 billion from MMR sales in 2024, while GSK pocketed over 411 million.
Why aren’t alternative treatments part of the conversation?
Clinics in Texas have quietly reported success treating measles complications with:
• Cod liver oil (packed with immune-boosting vitamins A and D)
• Budesonide (an anti-inflammatory steroid)
• Clarithromycin (a standard antibiotic)
But these options don’t generate pharmaceutical revenue—and thus, they’re excluded from mainstream coverage.
In 1962, The Saturday Evening Post exposed how Big Pharma colluded with regulators to downplay thalidomide’s birth defect risks—a scandal that shattered public trust. Today, history repeats itself as corporate media amplifies measles fear-mongering while sidelining MMR dangers, medical errors, and profit motives.
Will the truth about vaccine risks ever break through—or will the next tragic death simply be exploited to push more jabs?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
DEATH BY DOCTOR: Why and how doctors are now PAID TO KILL their patients
1 Doctors as Agents of Depopulation - Coleman alleges that doctors are being manipulated into killing or neglecting patients under the guise of combating climate change, targeting the elderly, disabled, and vulnerable first.
2 The medical establishment is prioritizing "environmental sustainability" over patient care, using tools like the NHS’s "Green Physician Toolkit" to justify cutting treatments, reducing in-person care, and promoting ineffective "green" alternatives (e.g., remote consultations, nature therapies).
3 The destruction of healthcare is tied to the UN’s alleged plan for a "world government," where elites cull populations via medical neglect, economic control, and environmental policies.
4 Healthcare’s decline is framed as deliberate, with comparisons to China’s technocracy, where individual health is sacrificed for systemic "sustainability" goals.
In America, unless you’ve got a broken bone, deep wound, or are having a baby, you might want to avoid going to the hospital, because more and more now U.S. hospitals are becoming like third world hospices. It’s not that ‘good’ kind of risk you want to take. Why? Doctors make more money in this country if they make you sick, keep you sick, and even get paid serious bonuses if you die under their care. Sounds like a tin foil hatted conspiracy theory, but as they say, the proof is in the pudding, and this pudding is toxic.
Forget about actual useful medicine and natural remedies, “science” says nobody’s medical needs take priority over the “climate change” conspiracy theory
As part of a depopulation agenda backed by billionaires like Bill Gates, doctors in America have all kinds of excuses for restricting medical care that people need and also promoting dirty medicine that people obviously do NOT need. Believe it or not, doctors are using “global warming” as a reason to deny medical care to patients. They call it the “Green Physician Toolkit” and it was published by the Royal College of Physicians. It’s recommended for U.S. health practitioners to “prioritize environmental sustainability over patient care,” because FAKE climate change is more important since it’s a “major threat to global health.”
In other words, because cows are farting so much these days, the glaciers are all melting and the polar bears can’t find any food, so people who need dire medical attention in hospitals won’t be getting it because the money and resources must all be allocated to save the polar bears and prevent cow flatulating worldwide. On top of that, the World Health Organization says the science is settled on global warming and no doctors anywhere in the world should ever try to debate the science on it. Just deny your patients care and keep your mouth shut about it, they are essentially told. It’s science!
Sounds just like Fauci during the plandemic when he said the science was settled and “follow the science” and “I AM the Science!” – even though there was NO science regarding safety or efficacy behind the deadly mRNA clot shots, wearing masks 24/7, social distancing, or lockdowns.
Are you ready to be injected with the Climate Vaccine? It’s coming. You too can help reduce the heat of the sun by injecting gene-mutation “technology” that creates billions of tiny prions in your blood that gather together to form rubbery clots that help feed the polar bears and stop cows from farting. This is Modern Medicine and Science so don’t you ever even try to question it or become a “vaccine skeptic,” or you will be force vaccinated at gunpoint by the INTERPOL VAX SQUAD.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
What’s next, uranium renamed “ur-anus-all” and put in vaccines that are deemed “safe and effective?” Maybe pharma will put some rattlesnake venom combined with some heroin and make that a “vaccine” that tricks human cells into producing infant zombies who spit venom and are addicted to fentanyl from birth. Don’t put anything past Big Pharma. After all, they are STILL pushing the Covid clot shots on all children as part of the CDC’s recommended childhood vaccine schedule.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
New York vaccine mandate lawsuits gain momentum as Bhattacharya and Makary confirmed to lead NIH and FDA
Plaintiffs in two high-profile lawsuits challenging New York City's Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine mandates for municipal workers are hopeful that the Senate confirmations of Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Marty Makary to lead top U.S. health agencies will bolster their legal battles.
On March 25, the Senate confirmed Bhattacharya as the new director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Makary as the new commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Both doctors submitted affidavits in federal court in Kane v. de Blasio and New Yorkers for Religious Liberty (NYFRL) v. City of New York on Oct. 4, 2021.
The two lawsuits represent thousands of city employees, including teachers, firefighters, police officers, sanitation workers and medical professionals, who were terminated or displaced for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine. Kane v. de Blasio focuses on educators, while NYFRL v. City of New York covers all municipal workers who were denied religious exemptions.
Both cases argue that the city's refusal to accommodate religious objections violated the First Amendment. The lawsuits are at different stages in the federal appeals process and could eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court.
At that time, Bhattacharya and Makary asserted that unvaccinated individuals do not pose a public health threat, natural immunity from prior COVID-19 infection is robust and may be superior to vaccine-induced immunity and mandates ignoring natural immunity are scientifically unsound.
Sujata Gibson, lead attorney for the plaintiffs, recalled how Bhattacharya and Makary stepped in to assist. "When I cold-called Dr. Makary and Dr. Bhattacharya on a weekend, they didn't hesitate, they dropped everything to help us, pro bono, on an emergency motion. Their generosity was a game-changer for our fight."
With both doctors now leading major federal health agencies, plaintiffs believe their legal arguments, rooted in the same scientific principles, could gain traction in court.
"Children's Health Defense (CHD) was the first organization in the nation to stand with fired New York City workers using unbiased science from Dr. Bhattacharya and Dr. Makary," said Mary Holland, CEO of CHD. "We have every reason to expect that these scientists will rely on the same unbiased science as they will now lead NIH and FDA."
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. could be another "hope" for lawsuits against COVID-19 vaccine mandates
Aside from the Senate confirmations of Bhattacharya and Makary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., founder and former chairman of CHD, was also appointed to lead the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Kennedy, a longtime critic of vaccine mandates and government overreach in public health, has vowed to restore scientific transparency and medical freedom. His leadership marks a stark departure from the 2021 era when dissenting voices, including those of Bhattacharya and Makary, were sidelined or censored for questioning mainstream COVID-19 policies.
Now, their once-suppressed perspectives are being elevated to the highest levels of federal health policy.
In other words, the plaintiffs have another reason to be hopeful in their lawsuits against COVID-19 vaccine mandates that affected their personal lives a few years back.
Watch the video below of Harrison Smith explaining the impact of vaccine mandates on the food supply.
https://www.brighteon.com/72bbdc27-1be9-44e2-a880-1e9a35963502
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
DEATH by VACCINE or face PRISON time: Canadian Freedom Convoy leaders CONVICTED for protesting forced vaccination during the Covid Plandemic
So, which is it? Do you prefer to have your entire body and brain flooded with spike prions that cause heart attacks, strokes and turbo cancer, or would you rather go to prison for 10 years for “resisting” the plandemic clot shots? You choose. This is exactly what the “Freedom Convoy” of Canadian truckers are dealing with right now, believe it or not.
Two organizers of Canada’s 2022 "Freedom Convoy" protests were convicted Friday of mischief charges, reigniting debates over government overreach during COVID-19 mandates. Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, who led truckers’ demonstrations against vaccine requirements, were found guilty of obstructing public property after a weeks-long blockade of Ottawa’s Parliament Hill.
The verdict comes over two years after former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked emergency powers—later deemed unconstitutional—to quash the protests. The case echoes similar tensions in the U.S., where truckers protested Biden’s policies, underscoring enduring divisions over pandemic-era mandates.
The Convictions and Legal Battle
Lich and Barber faced multiple charges stemming from the February 2022 protests, which paralyzed downtown Ottawa and border crossings. While acquitted of most counts, the mischief convictions carry up to a decade in prison if damages exceeded $5,000. Their defense argued they never incited illegality, pointing to their cooperation with authorities.
The case also spotlighted Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act, which enabled asset freezes and arrests. In January 2024, a federal court ruled the move violated Canada’s Charter of Rights. Justice Richard Mosley found the government’s actions lacked "justification, transparency, and intelligibility."
The Canadian protests inspired similar movements abroad, including U.S. truckers circling Washington, D.C., in opposition to vaccine policies. Critics warn the case sets a precedent for suppressing dissent, while supporters argue the crackdown was necessary to restore order.
The convictions of Lich and Barber close a contentious chapter in Canada’s pandemic response but lingering legal and political questions remain. With emergency powers ruled unconstitutional, the case reinforces scrutiny over how democracies balance public health mandates with civil liberties—a debate far from resolved.
Thank God and the patriots of America that the Fascist reign of terror is over in this country, and nobody has to worry about Trump putting natural health advocates in jail for protesting dirty vaccines or the next plandemic “mandates” that come down the pike. It’s nice to know the FDA won’t be kicking down doors and dragging people out of their homes or vehicles for peaceful protests or resisting the Big Pharma tyranny that besieged us all under Biden and Obama. Keep draining that swamp Trump, you’re doing a great job.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. unveils major overhauls to HHS: A risky gamble or a new era for public health?
In a bold move that has stirred both hope and controversy, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced a sweeping overhaul of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on Thursday, March 27.
This transformation includes the creation of a dedicated unit for vaccine injuries under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and a significant reduction in the federal health agency's workforce by 10,000 jobs. The announcement, made during an interview with NewsNation's Chris Cuomo, marks a pivotal moment in the administration’s efforts to reshape the nation’s public health landscape.
Kennedy emphasized that the new CDC unit will be a "priority focus" for his administration. This unit, he added, will operate in tandem with the health secretary previously announced vaccine injury reporting system. This new system will be "more accurate than the existing Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System," Kennedy claims.
The news of the new CDC vaccine injuries unit comes amid growing concerns from the public about vaccine safety and the increasing number of reported injuries. The decision to create this unit reflects the need for more transparency in reporting adverse events.
Also included in the overhaul is a significant reduction of roughly 10,000 jobs to the HHS workforce. This downsizing is part of a larger effort to eliminate bureaucratic inefficiencies and reduce wasteful spending. The department currently employs 82,000 people, but this number will drop to 62,000 once the cuts are implemented.
The job reductions will be felt across various agencies, with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) losing 3,500 employees; the CDC shedding 2,400 positions; and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) seeing a decrease of 1,200 employees. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will experience a smaller reduction of about 300 workers.
"Over time, bureaucracies like HHS become wasteful and inefficient, even when most of their staff are dedicated and competent civil servants," Kennedy said in defense of the job cuts. He expressed belief that these changes will ultimately benefit taxpayers and improve the department's ability to serve the American public.
Kennedy also sets up new HHS unit in line with MAHA agenda
As part of the HHS restructuring, the department will consolidate its 28 divisions into 15 and cut its 10 regional offices to five. A new Administration for a Healthy America (AHA) will be created, a move that lines up with Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda.
The new AHA combines offices that address addiction, toxic substances and occupational safety into one central unit – with the aim of streamlining operations and improving coordination across different areas of public health. The AHA will include the following agencies under the HHS:
• Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health
• Health Resources and Services Administration
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
• Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (under the CDC)
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (under the CDC)
While the overhaul promises to bring about significant changes, it also raises concerns about the potential impact on public health. Critics argue that the job cuts could lead to delays in drug and medical device reviews, as well as missed deadlines. Moreover, they argue that the elimination of certain CDC divisions – such as those focused on global health, domestic HIV prevention and injury prevention – raise serious alarms.
Ultimately, the reorganization is designed to eliminate redundancies and ensure that resources are used more effectively. The HHS overhaul represents a dramatic shift in the way the federal government approaches public health.
Watch Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discussing how toxins in food are linked to anxiety and depression.
https://www.brighteon.com/2db16ebf-626c-47ca-bc85-5b86b33e802c
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Kennedy reinstates essential HHS programs, ensures continuity amid cuts
In a move demonstrating measured governance, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the reinstatement of critical personnel and programs mistakenly cut in a sweeping federal workforce reduction this week. While the Trump administration’s broader initiative — spearheaded by government efficiency czar Elon Musk — aims to eliminate bureaucratic bloat, Kennedy has taken steps to preserve essential services, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) lead-monitoring program. The decision underscores his commitment to safeguarding public health while trimming excess, even as disgruntled agency staff and progressive critics resist the reforms.
Some terminated employees will continue working through June 2 to ensure an orderly transition, HHS confirmed, minimizing disruption to vital health services. Yet Kennedy’s selective reversals highlight a key principle: fiscal responsibility must not come at the cost of frontline health protections.
Correcting missteps, preserving priorities
Kennedy clarified that the layoffs, which initially slashed 10,000 positions across HHS agencies like the FDA, CDC, and NIH, were never intended to gut indispensable programs. “Personnel that should not have been cut were cut — we’re reinstating them, and that was always the plan,” he told ABC News. The CDC’s lead poisoning prevention branch, which monitors toxic exposure in children, was among the first flagged for restoration — a decision applauded by local health officials reliant on its support.
Milwaukee Health Commissioner Mike Totoraitis, whose team urgently needed CDC assistance to address lead contamination in schools, voiced cautious relief. “If our program is reinstated, that is fantastic news. We need this for our nation,” said Erik Svendsen, the branch’s former director. HHS later clarified the program’s functions would continue under consolidated offices, ensuring no lapse in protecting children from preventable harm.
Kennedy’s approach mirrors promises made during the restructuring’s rollout: an 80% reduction in redundant administrative roles — IT, HR, and communications — while maintaining core services. "And one of the things that President Trump has said is that if we make mistakes, we're going to admit it and we're going to remedy it, and that's one of the mistakes," he said.
Streamlining without sacrificing safety
Critics, including ousted bureaucrats and unionized federal employees, have protested the cuts outside agency headquarters, accusing the administration of recklessness. But Kennedy insists the reforms target inefficiencies, not expertise. For instance, the FDA’s drug-review divisions and NIH research grants remain largely untouched, while bloated middle-management layers face elimination.
Temporary extensions for some employees further reflect pragmatism. “This decision is focused on ensuring that the transition is as seamless as possible, minimizing any disruption to the agency's mission and operations,” said HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon. The measured phaseout contrasts with apocalyptic predictions from opponents, who falsely claimed vaccines or infectious disease tracking would suffer. Instead, Kennedy’s team has identified redundancies — like 15 separate CDC communications offices — as prime candidates for consolidation.
A healthier, leaner future
The HHS overhaul, while contentious, signals a long-overdue reckoning with bureaucratic sprawl. Taxpayer savings from the cuts — reducing HHS staffing from 82,000 to 62,000 — will be redirected to high-impact initiatives, including Kennedy’s proposed “Administration for a Healthy America.” By retaining critical programs like lead surveillance and reinvesting in public health infrastructure, the secretary is proving fiscal conservatism and effective governance need not be at odds.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Walensky acknowledged that implementing a third MMR dose would incur costs but argued that it "can be cost-effective compared with the resources required to treat infections and contain outbreaks." However, Jablonowski countered that this approach is a "knee-jerk reaction to fear" and that "the manufacturing of fear is a multi-billion-dollar-a-year industry."
Dr. Peter Kasson, a professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology, emphasized the severity of measles, stating that it can "ravage the immune system and brain, causing long-term damage." While measles is indeed highly contagious, David Speicher, a molecular virologist and epidemiologist at the University of Guelph, noted that "the risk of getting that severe disease is low and the risk of transmitting or getting infected in a population where most of the population is immunized for measles is also extremely low."
As the debate over the necessity of an additional MMR dose for young babies continues, it is crucial to weigh the potential benefits against the risks. The case in Arizona serves as a reminder that vaccine reactions can be mistaken for actual infections, raising questions about the accuracy of diagnoses and the precautionary measures taken.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Immunologist Jessica Rose, PhD, noted that repeated mRNA injections could induce epigenetic reprogramming in stem cells, potentially causing long-term immune dysfunction. “We’re seeing chronic inflammatory conditions in pharmacovigilance data,” she said. “This isn’t theoretical—it’s happening.”
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher warned that the study highlights “immune dysregulation” that could lead to chronic disease and cancer. “These findings should have halted the vaccine rollout immediately,” he said.
Despite the study’s damning conclusions, neither the FDA nor the CDC has issued new warnings. Meanwhile, Japan—one of the most mRNA-vaccinated nations—has seen a statistically significant rise in leukaemia cases, raising urgent questions about causation.
Karl Jablonowski, PhD, a senior researcher at Children’s Health Defense, criticized the study authors for downplaying risks. “Their blind faith in mRNA technology is dangerous,” he said. “Unintended genetic reprogramming isn’t a benefit—it’s a catastrophe waiting to happen.”
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The FDA’s decision to add COVID vaccines to the routine childhood schedule, despite the lack of full approval and the mounting evidence of potential harm, is deeply troubling. It is time for a serious conversation about accountability and the need to re-evaluate the current vaccination strategy. In the words of Dr. Bowden, “We have to be worried about now.” The time for action is long overdue. It is imperative that we remove these products from the market until their safety and efficacy can be unequivocally proven.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Pearce's observation that "Vaccination as at present practised is a mockery" resonates with those who argue that the COVID-19 vaccines were rushed to market without sufficient long-term safety data. His concerns about the contamination of the vaccine lymph find a parallel in the debate over the ingredients and potential side effects of modern vaccines.
Moreover, Pearce's emphasis on the ethical implications of compulsory vaccination is relevant to the ongoing debate over vaccine mandates. His argument that "vaccination is a crime against nature, and ought not to be enforced" speaks to the heart of the issue: protecting the balance between individual freedom and the insane demands of public health collectivism, hellbent on repeating medical interventions that do more harm than good.
As we reflect on the history of the smallpox vaccine, it is clear that the debate over vaccination has been going on for over a century. Pearce's essay, though written over 150 years ago, offers a powerful critique that continues to resonate today. His work challenges us to question the narratives surrounding vaccination and to consider the broader implications of mass vaccination campaigns.
In the end, the question remains: are vaccines the saviors they are often claimed to be, or are they part of a larger, more complex story? Instead of medical professionals putting vaccines on a pedestal, it's time for medical responsibility and true informed consent on every issue of vaccination. The real history of vaccination needs to be told, and skepticism is needed, not blind worship.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Legacy and accountability
Many of these experiments remained classified for decades, only coming to light through Freedom of Information Act requests and investigative journalism. While some victims and their families have sought justice, most received no compensation or acknowledgment from the government.
These unethical experiments raise critical questions about medical ethics, government transparency and human rights. They serve as a grim reminder of what can happen when scientific research is conducted without oversight or consent – a warning that remains relevant today as new technologies and military strategies emerge.
Watch this video about the infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.
https://www.brighteon.com/0ce10ab6-77a7-429c-8eea-b53c5ce1cdc8
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Multidrug-resistant Candida auris: The SILENT KILLER in America’s hospitals
In the shadowy corridors of America's healthcare facilities, a new and deadly threat is silently spreading. Candida auris, a drug-resistant fungus, is rapidly becoming one of the most formidable adversaries faced by health officials today.
Described by some medical professionals as akin to "having cancer," this insidious pathogen is not only resistant to most treatments but is also spreading at an alarming rate, posing a significant risk to public health.
First detected in U.S. hospitals in 2016, C. auris initially seemed like a minor concern with only 52 cases reported across four states. However, the situation has since spiraled out of control. By 2023, the number of infections had skyrocketed to 4,514, affecting 38 states.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) declared it an "urgent threat" in 2023, but the situation has only worsened. States like Georgia and Florida are now experiencing a rapid increase in cases, raising the alarm bells even louder.
C. auris is a type of yeast infection that is notoriously difficult to treat. It is resistant to most standard disinfectants and antifungal drugs, making it a formidable foe in hospital settings.
This resistance extends to common antifungal medications like Diflucan, and even second-line treatments such as Mycamine are ineffective in 10 percent of cases. The fungus can colonize the skin and survive on surfaces like medical equipment and bedrails for weeks, making it a persistent threat.
The consequences of a C. auris infection can be devastating. The fungus can enter the body through cuts or medical devices such as breathing tubes and catheters, leading to severe infections.
Identifying an infection can be challenging as symptoms often mimic those of other infections – including fever, chills and aches. In some cases, infected wounds may show redness, warmth and pus. The fungus can also cause infections in the bloodstream and vital organs, which can be fatal if not treated promptly.
Once it spreads to the bloodstream, it can cause life-threatening conditions. Approximately one in three people who contract C. auris succumb to the infection. Those with prolonged hospital stays or who require invasive treatments are particularly vulnerable.
The spread of a lethal superbug
The fungus is not only spreading within hospitals, but is also beginning to affect the community. Nevada health officials have warned that C. auris may be spreading beyond healthcare facilities for the first time in U.S. history. This development is particularly concerning given the fungus's ability to survive on surfaces and its resistance to many common disinfectants.
The threat of C. auris is not confined to the United States. Since its discovery in Japan in 2009, it has spread globally, causing outbreaks in hospitals and long-term care facilities worldwide. Meanwhile, the Public Health Agency of Canada has labeled it a "disease of public health significance."
Researchers are working tirelessly to develop new treatments and improve detection methods. Healthcare facilities are adopting more stringent cleaning protocols, using specialized disinfectants designed to kill the fungus. Dr. Timothy Connelly of Memorial Health in Savannah, Georgia, emphasizes the importance of using "List P" disinfectants, which are specifically designed to combat C. auris.
C. auris represents a significant challenge to global health. Its resistance to treatment, coupled with its ability to spread easily in healthcare settings, makes it a formidable adversary. However, with continued research, improved infection control measures and heightened awareness, it is possible to mitigate its impact and protect vulnerable populations.
Watch this news report about deaths from C. auris infections in 2021.
https://www.brighteon.com/78ff7851-11a2-47c2-a1ff-590c96436784
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
German researchers find link between mRNA vaccines and GENETIC CHANGES that precede CANCER and AUTOIMMUNE DISORDERS
The mRNA scandal leads to cancer and autoimmune disease explosion
In the wake of the COVID-19 scandal, a groundbreaking study by 19 German scientists has shed new light on the potential long-term risks associated with mRNA vaccines. Published in the prestigious journal Molecular Systems Biology, the research reveals that these vaccines may cause persistent genetic alterations, leading to an increased risk of cancer and autoimmune disorders. This revelation has ignited a firestorm of debate, raising critical questions about the safety and ethical implications of these widely administered vaccines.
The study focused on the effects of mRNA vaccines on macrophages, immune cells that play a vital role in defending the body against pathogens. The researchers found that the vaccines altered a key component of these cells' chromosomes: the histones. Histones are DNA-binding proteins that give DNA its three-dimensional structure, a fact emphasized by Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at Children's Health Defense. "Most scientific studies on histone modification primarily focus on the manifestation of disease," Jablonowski noted.
The study identified a specific change known as "histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation" (H3K27ac), which was observed in the macrophages of vaccinated individuals. This alteration, according to journalist Alex Berenson, is linked to several types of cancer and has been the subject of increasing scientific scrutiny. The researchers found that these changes persisted for many months after vaccination, suggesting that similar alterations may be occurring in monocytes, a type of white blood cell that produces macrophages.
Berenson highlighted the significance of these findings, stating that the alterations are epigenetic, meaning they occur around DNA's core and can activate genes in ways that promote tumor growth. "The risk here is, of course, prolonged and excessive inflammation, which might contribute to tissue damage or chronic inflammatory conditions," he explained.
The broader implications
Epigenetics, the study of how behavior and environment can cause changes that affect gene expression, is at the heart of this debate. Immunologist and biochemist Jessica Rose, Ph.D., emphasized that the study confirms existing concerns about the risks of mRNA vaccines. "Repeat injection leads to a boatload of immunological modifications," she said. "If the systemic reach goes far enough, such as to stem cells, then repeated injection could potentially induce epigenetic changes in these cells."
This is particularly concerning given the role of hematopoietic stem cells, which are known to develop innate immune memory in response to certain stimuli. The potential for these cells to be reprogrammed by mRNA vaccines raises the specter of long-term health consequences, including chronic inflammatory diseases and oncogenic processes.
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher echoed these concerns, stating that the study adds to the growing body of evidence describing the potent immune dysregulating effects of mRNA injections. "This raises serious concerns about long-term immune homeostasis and the potential for chronic inflammatory disease, autoimmune sequelae, and even oncogenic processes," he warned.
A call for re-evaluation
The study's findings have strengthened calls for the suspension or withdrawal of mRNA vaccines. A petition filed earlier this year with the FDA by a group of scientists argues that the vaccines are unapproved gene therapies and are contaminated with DNA plasmids. This petition, along with several recent studies, has fueled the debate over the safety of these vaccines.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻