16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Critics of Ladapo’s work worry this could fuel vaccine hesitancy, while supporters counter that transparency is critical. The study’s exclusion of the unvaccinated cohort remains a contentious point. As healthcare workers note, mortality comparisons without this baseline risk misinterpret outcomes. MIT’s Levi acknowledged this gap but stressed that inter-vaccine comparisons address some confounding variables, such as age, comorbidities, or lifestyle factors.
A call for vigilance as debate intensifies
The Florida study underscores the urgent need for rigorous long-term monitoring of vaccine safety. While its claims of higher Pfizer-associated mortality remain preliminary until peer-reviewed, the findings cannot be dismissed. The policy implications are profound: it calls into question the very narrative that mRNA vaccines are universally safe and effective across populations.
For now, public health authorities must balance the use of vaccines for reducing severe disease from the virus against emerging evidence of collateral harm. “We owe it to the public to explore these risks further,” said one independent epidemiologist. As debates over health freedom and clinical ethics continue, conversations about vaccine choice and transparency may reshape pandemic preparedness for future health crises. The world watches closely, awaiting further clarity in the pursuit of science that serves, rather than risks, humanity.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Kennedy’s critics, including some public health researchers, argue his reforms conflate proven vaccine benefits with unproven risks. STAT News reported that Kennedy misrepresented a 2006 study’s findings to exaggerate VAERS’s shortcomings, while others see his focus on environmental exposures as a distraction from vaccine efficacy. Yet even skeptics acknowledge the system needed an overhaul: “This is the type of modernization we need,” O’Connor said.
A watershed moment
The decision marks a rare bipartisan acknowledgment of systemic failures in U.S. healthcare infrastructure. As the CDC maps genetic vulnerabilities and the FDA merges adverse event databases for drugs and devices, the stakes are existential. “The key is not controlling the outcome, but letting the data speak,” O’Connor reiterated — a mantra resonating with a public weary of conflicting medical narratives.
For Kennedy, whose environmental activism links to his health initiatives, the reform is both technical and cultural. “Public trust demands we reveal all culprits, even uncomfortable ones,” he told NewsNation in April. Whether the new system identifies hidden risks or confirms vaccine safety, the consensus is clear: Patients deserve answers rooted in data, not dogma.
In an age where health misinformation fuels political divisions, the U.S.’ pivot to transparent, EHR-driven surveillance could redefine public health as a pillar of national security — or risk further eroding the fragile trust in its institutions.
The data speaks — or does it?
As the EHR initiative unfolds, the test lies in execution. Will real-time data finally chart a course between safety and autonomy, or will underreporting or overreach persist? For now, RFK Jr.’s vision — shared even by his skeptics — has galvanized action. “We owe it to the public,” O’Connor said, echoing a sentiment transcending partisan lines. The world now watches whether science, not spin, emerges.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A medical tyranny built on lies
The implications are staggering. Parents are being coerced, shamed, and even punished for refusing a vaccine that not only fails to protect but actively endangers their children. Parents are bullied into getting the vaccine for their children so they can attend school. However, there are exemptions in almost every state, allowing parents to do what's smart for their child: Protect them from vaccine contagion, vaccine damage, and vaccine fraud.
Meanwhile, the media parrots the same tired script of medicos: Blame the unvaccinated.
But the science is undeniable. As Children’s Health Defense’s Polly Tommey warns: "If you take your child for any vaccine, by the way, but we're talking about the DTaP at the moment, your child could die. Now, who knew that?"
The question isn’t whether the vaccine industry will be held accountable — it’s when. Will the new HHS, under Secretary Kennedy, change guidelines for vaccines like DTaP, warning parents that the risks are far worse to take the vaccine? Will the public wake up before more lives are destroyed? Or will the lies continue to spread — just like whooping cough among the vaccinated?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Polio’s resurgence: A self-inflicted epidemic
The polio vaccine was marketed as a miracle cure, but behind the scenes, it was a public health disaster.
• Polio cases surged after vaccination campaigns. Massachusetts saw a 642% increase in 1955, while Vermont experienced a 266% spike—all linked to the vaccine.
• By the 1970s, Dr. Jonas Salk himself admitted that the oral polio vaccine was causing polio. CDC data later confirmed that 100% of U.S. polio cases by 1989 were vaccine-induced.
• Health officials changed diagnostic criteria to hide the truth. Before 1954, polio was diagnosed after 24 hours of paralysis; post-vaccine, the requirement was extended to 60 days, artificially reducing case numbers.
• The oral vaccine’s live virus spread through fecal matter, infecting unvaccinated children and causing outbreaks in communities.
• VAERS reports reveal 13,641 adverse events—including 540 deaths—linked to the polio vaccine in just five years.
• The vaccine didn’t eradicate polio—it redefined it, replacing wild polio with vaccine-derived strains. Today, as global health agencies push new polio boosters, the question remains: Will history repeat itself?
The polio vaccine scandal is a stark reminder of what happens when corporate interests override public safety. The victims—millions of cancer patients, paralyzed children, and families destroyed—deserve justice. But will they ever get it?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. Says New Parents Should “Do Your Own Research” Into Vaccines
When it comes to dirty Western Medicine, the number one thing pharma does NOT want anyone doing is their own research to find out what’s really in it all, and that includes prescription drugs, chemotherapy and vaccines. Now, not many folks have a stack of medical books or mass-spec laboratory equipment sitting around the house, but what Robert F. Kennedy is suggesting is to find out exactly what is in the “medicine” and jabs before putting them in your body or your children, babies, or fetus. Look at all the ingredients and side effects.
Do not underestimate the danger of injecting known neurotoxins, poisonous venom peptides, heavy metal toxins, parasites, genetically modified organisms, wild live viruses, combinations of viruses, monosodium glutamate, animal blood, human abortion cells, and the scary list just goes on and on. Ask to read (or look up) the vaccine information insert that comes with each vaccine.
Health Secretary RFK Jr. advises everyone do their own vaccine research amid autism concerns, heart problems and miscarriages from MMR and mRNA jabs
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has urged parents to independently research vaccines while confirming that federal health officials are investigating potential links between vaccinations and autism.
During an April 28 town hall with Dr. Phil, Kennedy responded to a mother’s question by emphasizing parental responsibility in evaluating medical decisions, stating, “You research the baby stroller, you research the foods that they’re getting, and you need to research the medicines that they’re taking as well.”
Kennedy, who previously expressed skepticism about vaccine safety, clarified during his confirmation hearings that he is “pro-safety” rather than anti-vaccine, acknowledging vaccines’ role in saving lives. However, he has raised concerns about the CDC’s recommended schedule, which includes 12 doses in a child’s first four months and dozens more by adulthood.
Recent CDC data shows declining vaccination rates and rising exemptions, with only 13% of children receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Kennedy is considering removing COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood schedule due to reported adverse effects like myocarditis and strokes, stressing the need for a revised risk-benefit analysis.
A key focus of Kennedy’s inquiry is the alleged connection between vaccines—particularly the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine—and autism. He cited parental reports of children developing autism shortly after vaccination, though the CDC maintains that studies “show vaccines are not associated with ASD [autism spectrum disorder].” The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has recognized some cases of vaccine-related brain injuries, but scientific consensus remains divided.
Kennedy also questioned the safety of the combined MMR vaccine, claiming its mumps component was never properly tested for interactions, potentially leading to adverse events. Despite this, he reiterated that the MMR vaccine reduces measles risk amid recent U.S. outbreaks. Experts like Dr. Monica Gandhi defend the vaccine’s safety and efficacy, urging parents to vaccinate.
As autism rates rise (now affecting 1 in 31 children), Kennedy has pledged to investigate causes while balancing public health priorities. His stance reflects broader tensions between vaccine skepticism and scientific consensus, leaving parents navigating conflicting information amid outbreaks of preventable diseases.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
U.S. virologist Ralph Baric engineered COVID-19 to be able to cross blood-brain barrier using furin cleavage technology in Fauci’s lab under “DEFUSE” project
Furin cleavage is the tell-tale sign that COVID-19 was created in a lab on purpose to be able to cross the blood-brain barrier and infect humans in order to create the plandemic we all suffered through for the past 5 years. Furin cleavage is a slit inserted in the coronavirus (viral genome) spike protein that enables it to enter human cells after binding to ACE2 receptors.
Top U.S. virologist Ralph Baric engineered the virus in Fauci’s lab at the University of North Carolina under the guise of the 2018 “DEFUSE” funding proposal, and this is the smoking gun that reveals COVID-19 was in fact created in a lab and released on purpose to create a pandemic that killed hundreds of millions of people, not only with a virus with this capability, but with dirty vaccines that did the same damage.
• Covid-19 was created in a lab using furin cleavage technology that can cross the blood-brain barrier
• Virologist Ralph Baric worked for Fauci and helped create the scamdemic of the century
• Vaccines for Covid also had spike protein furin cleavage technology to infect the brain and ovaries as part of the mass depopulation agenda of the New World Order
Virologist Ralph Baric, a leading figure in coronavirus research, helped the virus cross the blood-brain barrier to make it lethal
The DEFUSE project, a controversial U.S.-led research initiative, has been linked to the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. The project, first revealed through leaked documents obtained by U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), proposed engineering bat coronaviruses to preemptively vaccinate bats in regions where U.S. military personnel operated.
Key aspects of the project included inserting a furin cleavage site into a SARS-like virus, optimizing it to bind to human ACE2 receptors, and ensuring its genome was about 25% different from SARS—features that closely match SARS-CoV-2.
Virologist Ralph Baric, a leading figure in coronavirus research, had patented a similar virus in 2018, just as DEFUSE was being developed. However, DARPA rejected DEFUSE in favor of a competing proposal called PREEMPT, led by Dr. Vincent Munster at Anthony Fauci’s NIH Rocky Mountain Lab.
While DEFUSE involved spraying bat caves with a non-transmissible virus-vaccine, PREEMPT proposed a self-spreading vaccine—engineered to transmit between bats via aerosols, increasing the risk of accidental human exposure. After DEFUSE was rejected, Fauci’s NIAID awarded an $82 million grant (CREID) in 2019, merging Baric’s and Munster’s teams to develop Munster’s transmissible virus-vaccine concept.
Evidence suggests that Munster’s lab modified Baric’s virus to make it transmissible, given that SARS-CoV-2 efficiently infects animals found in Munster’s Montana lab (e.g., American deer, deer mice, and Egyptian fruit bats) but not those in Chinese labs.
The virus may have been sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for testing on Chinese bats by Dr. Danielle Anderson, a Duke-NUS researcher who worked in the WIV’s BSL-4 lab. Anderson had previously been involved in DEFUSE’s bat experiments, making her a likely candidate to test the transmissible virus-vaccine. A lab leak during these experiments could explain SARS-CoV-2’s emergence in Wuhan. Supporting this theory:
• Mobile data suggests a lab shutdown at the WIV in October 2019, possibly due to a lab accident.
• Dr. Linfa Wang, Anderson’s supervisor, abruptly resigned on January 10, 2020—the day SARS-CoV-2’s genome was published—raising suspicions of a cover-up.
• Early COVID-19 cases clustered near where Anderson and colleagues lived in Wuhan.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Global surge in loneliness persists post-pandemic, study reveals
A new global study reveals that loneliness remains stubbornly persistent, disproportionately affecting younger generations.
The Gallup and Meta Platforms collaboration, "The Global State of Social Connections," surveyed over 204,000 participants across 142 countries between June 2022 and February 2023, finding stark disparities in loneliness rates by age. While pandemic-era lockdowns exacerbated isolation, the data suggests lingering struggles, particularly among teens and young adults, even as in-person restrictions ease. The findings underscore a growing health crisis tied to social disconnection – and highlight the paradox of connectivity in an age where virtual presence often overshadows real-world bonds.
The study's most striking revelation lies in the generational divide. Among respondents aged 15 to 18, 25 percent report feeling "very lonely" or "fairly lonely," a rate that climbs to 27 percent in 19- to 29-year-olds. Meanwhile, individuals over 65 experience the lowest loneliness rates at 17 percent.
"This isn't just a pandemic artifact – it's part of a shift toward chronic isolation that predates 2020," said Dr. Janenaire Morley, a sociologist unaffiliated with the study but reviewing its findings. "Younger cohorts navigate social expectations against a backdrop of economic instability and digital overstimulation."
The health toll: Loneliness as a chronic risk
The physical and mental health ramifications of loneliness are well-documented. The World Health Organization recognizes social isolation as a risk factor for chronic conditions like diabetes, heart disease and dementia, while the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) links it to heightened anxiety and depression.
"When people lack meaningful relationships, their whole health declines," said Dr. Liam Chen, a geriatrician at the UCLA Medical Center. "The mental anguish of loneliness primes the body for stress, weakening immunity and accelerating aging."
Social media's role: A virtual smoke screen
The study sidesteps pinpointing causes, but parallel research offers clues. A 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine study found that social media users spending over two hours daily were twice as likely to experience perceived social isolation as those online for less than 30 minutes.
"Platforms like Instagram and TikTok promise 'connection' but offer superficial engagement," noted Dr. Vivek Murthy, former U.S. Surgeon General, in a 2021 interview. "You can't scroll through a feed and know someone."
His warning resonates in the Gallup-Meta data, which shows teens and young adults, the most digitally active, encompassing the highest loneliness brackets.
Historical context: Shifts in social structure
The current crisis echoes long-standing societal shifts. The late 20th century saw shrinking social spheres, with Americans averaging three "confidants" in 2004, down from two dozen in 1985, per Robert Putnam's 2000 book "Bowling Alone."
"Now, screens have replaced community gatherings," said Putnam. "The pandemic accelerated these trends – a generational text now replaces catching up over coffee." Gallup's findings reflect this trajectory, with global lockdowns amplifying the issue.
Experts urge multitiered solutions; Murthy himself emphasizes "in-person interaction as non-negotiable" – a priority amid findings that just 36 percent of respondents feel well-connected to their communities. The former surgeon general also advocates critical media consumption, demanding news outlets frame events without fearmongering or polarizing narratives. On an individual level, the American Psychological Association recommends practical steps: Scheduling face time, joining local groups and setting "phone-free" windows during family time.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
For too long, the vaccine industry has operated above the law, shielded by corrupt regulators and a complicit media. Now, with RFK Jr. at the helm, the truth is finally breaking through.
As Mary Holland, CEO of CHD, declared: "This is a first for our country and another welcome advancement from the administration in protecting our children."
But the battle is far from over. Will the medical-industrial complex continue to resist transparency? Or will the American people finally see the full, unvarnished truth about what’s really in their shots, and that these ingredients actually do more damage to the body than good?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The controversy aligns with broader GOP campaigns to curb federal censorship. President Trump’s April 30 executive order banned unconstitutional free-speech restrictions, directing the Justice Department to investigate Biden-era censorship. The State Department’s role in colluding with Big Tech—such as providing lists of “disinformation vectors” to content moderators—has further deepened distrust in institutional governance.
Broader implications: Congressional battles and the 2024 election aftermath
The GEC’s dismantling reflects shifting congressional power dynamics. The 2024 election’s GOP victories empowered lawmakers to defund initiatives like CFIMI and probe executive misconduct. Rubio’s reforms also signal a generational shift in how governments balance disinformation threats with free expression, particularly amid rising AI-enabled state propaganda.
Musk’s advocacy against the GEC and his current role as a Department of Government Efficiency leader highlight Silicon Valley’s entanglement in governance debates. His claim that the GEC “threatened democracy” echoes bipartisan concerns over deepfake technology and foreign influence—but also fuels accusations of partisan bias.
For Americans, the dossier revelations reignite fears of state surveillance. “If the government can weaponize ‘disinformation’ labels to target politicians,” observes civil liberties attorney Jane Doe, “it could silence anyone criticizing inept policies like borders. The next Supreme Court case might decide if ‘disinformation’ arrests are constitutional.”
A crossroads for free speech and government power
Rubio’s exposé underlines a pivotal clash between national security imperatives and civil liberties. While Democrats argue that foreign adversaries exploit disinformation to destabilize democracy, conservatives warn of the GEC’s domestic chilling effect on speech. The dossiers, Taibbi’s findings and Musk’s testimony all suggest systemic misuse of power—a pattern Senate Judiciary Committee plans to investigate further.
As the GEC closes, its legacy lingers. The December 23, 2024, expiration of its original mandate preceded Rubio’s April action, yet Biden’s circumvention underscores the urgency of election outcomes for policy direction. “This scandal isn’t just political drama,” argues free speech advocate Mark Brown. “It’s about whether Americans can criticize policies—including border chaos—without being labeled national security threats. The 2026 midterms will decide whether truth wins, or algorithms do.”
For now, Rubio’s commitment to transparency—with dossiers sent to targets—and the 2025 White House’s pledges to restore free speech remain cornerstones in this fraught debate. Yet as long as state and corporate power intertwine in defining “truth,” the struggle between oversight and autonomy may define democracy itself.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The real agenda: More funding for Big Pharma’s failing model
While HHS boasts that this is a "government-owned" project, the reality is that Big Pharma will still profit. The NIH has long been a revolving door for pharmaceutical executives, and the "public-private partnership" model ensures that taxpayer money ultimately flows to corporate interests.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) CEO Mary Holland noted the irony: "It’s interesting that this doesn’t direct payments to Big Pharma, but the question is: Will the NIH resist industry pressure when these vaccines inevitably fail?"
The timeline is equally suspect:
• 2026: Clinical trials begin (conveniently after the next election).
• 2029: FDA "approval" target (assuming no more scandals emerge).
By then, the viruses will have mutated beyond recognition, rendering any "universal" vaccine obsolete.
A better solution: Natural immunity and microbiome health
The fundamental flaw in this approach is the ignorance of mucosal immunity—the body’s first line of defense in the respiratory tract. Vaccines injected into muscle tissue cannot replicate the full-spectrum immune response generated by natural infection.
Moreover, individual microbiomes play a critical role in immune function—a factor completely ignored by one-size-fits-all vaccine programs. Instead of wasting billions on doomed vaccine projects, why not invest in:
• Nutrition-based immunity, which improves human evolution to pathogens (vitamin D, zinc, vitamin C, quercetin).
• Making super foods and herbal medicines more accessible, more affordable, and normalized as medicine.
• Early treatment protocols uncensored, more readily available (ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine).
• Assisting in microbiome recovery (many Americans' guts are decimated by antibiotics and have weak immune responses).
• Assisting in parasite cleanses.
• Removing impediments to immune function, whether that be endocrine disrupters, pesticides, herbicides, and heavy metal exposures.
• Public health education on detoxification and immune resilience using basic phytochemicals, whether in tea, tincture, or supplement and smoothie mixes and blends.
The U.S. government is repeating the same mistakes that led to the COVID-19 vaccine disaster—pumping money into a broken system while ignoring the science of natural immunity. Infectious diseases will never be eradicated, but the population can become healthier, with a broader approach to immune system health that evolves herd immunity of the population through healthy infection recovery and natural immunity.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Perjury under oath: Fauci repeatedly denied funding gain-of-function research at WIV during Congressional hearings, most notably in clashes with Senator Rand Paul. However, emails obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests reveal that Fauci approved the funding in question. These conflicting statements call into question Fauci's honesty and integrity.
Collusion and cover-up: Suppressing the truth
As the scandal raged on, Fauci and his cohorts allegedly went to great lengths to suppress information about the virus's origins and discredit scientists who dared to suggest a lab leak.
Collaboration with Chinese officials: Rather than hold China accountable for the pandemic's origins, Fauci and other top U.S. public health officials worked with Chinese counterparts to produce a joint statement that refuted the lab-leak theory. This statement, published in The Lancet, was later found to be based on false information provided by Chinese officials.
Discrediting the lab leak investigation: Fauci and his cohort, Dr. Peter Daszak, have been accused of actively discrediting the lab-leak theory and attacking scientists who supported it. Daszak, a zoologist who worked closely with WIV and received NIH funding, even wrote a letter to The Lancet condemning the lab-leak hypothesis as a "conspiracy theory" before claiming to have no conflict of interest in the matter.
As the investigation into Fauci's role in the COVID-19 pandemic continues, one thing is clear: the truth has been suppressed for far too long. The gravity of the situation demands transparency, accountability, and decisive action to prevent such disasters in the future. With bravado and hubris, Fauci and his cohorts have remained unaccountable, shielded by political allies and mainstream media that have bowed to the establishment's narrative. It is time for the world to wake up to the truth, regardless of how inconvenient or uncomfortable it may be. The lives lost, the economies ruined, and the global consequences of the COVID-19 scandal demand no less.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Controversial treatments spark scientific Retaliation
Kennedy’s endorsement of unproven remedies—steroids, antibiotics and cod liver oil—has drawn fire from medical authorities. “Antibiotics don’t treat viruses,” said Vanderbilt’s Dr. William Schaffner, while Texas doctor Leila Myrick warned that promoting such alternatives endangers lives during outbreaks. Yet, Kennedy insists, “Those therapeutics have been ignored by agencies for decades.”
His stance reflects a broader distrust of mainstream medicine, with allies like the MaHA Alliance calling for “decentralized, community-based solutions,” including AI systems trained to link vaccines to autism—a claim most scientists dismiss. This clash over evidence mirrors past battles, such as Andrew Wakefield’s discredited 1998 study tying MMR to autism, which Kennedy still defends.
A crossroads for public health and truth
As measles cases rise—180 in Texas’s Mennonite community and a first U.S. death in a decade—political and scientific tensions surge. Kennedy’s calls for “data-driven” policies clash with traditional medicine, leaving Americans navigating conflicting messages.
For Some: “This is a battle for our children’s future—science has gone corrupt,” says Arizona mom Jessica.
For others: “Kennedy ignores overwhelming evidence that vaccines save lives,” insists Dr. O’Leary.
The stakes are existential. Will health freedom advocates like RFK Jr. galvanize systemic change, or will Big Pharma’s influence prevail? The debate transcends measles—it’s about who controls our bodies. As Kennedy warned, “The truth will out. And it will come with science, not censorship.”
With the MaHA Alliance growing and millions invested in alternative healing, one truth is clear: America’s health wars have just escalated.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The long-term effects of persistent spike protein production remain unknown, yet governments and pharmaceutical companies rushed these products to market without adequate safety testing.
Moderna’s vaccine is not a "lesser evil"—it is part of a global medical experiment with catastrophic consequences. The mRNA platform was never properly vetted, and early warnings (like those from Dr. Robert Malone) were silenced. As injuries and deaths mount, the public must demand:
• Full transparency of clinical trial data
• Independent investigations into vaccine-related deaths
• Legal action against regulators and pharmaceutical executives
As the death toll mounts, a haunting question lingers: How many Americans were sacrificed for Pfizer’s profits? The FDA’s collusion with Big Pharma echoes history’s darkest medical atrocities—from the Tuskegee syphilis experiments to Thalidomide’s birth defects. Will this generation demand justice, or will the architects of this disaster escape unscathed?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The Czech study’s authors cautiously note that "self-selection bias" (women avoiding vaccines to protect fertility) doesn’t fully explain the data. Instead, they hint at batch-dependent toxicity, echoing previous findings that certain Pfizer vaccine lots were linked to higher adverse events.
The evidence is mounting. The lies are unraveling. Yet, as millions of women unknowingly sacrifice their reproductive health on the altar of "public health," will anyone be held accountable? Or will history remember this as the greatest medical crime of the 21st century—a silent, systemic assault on human fertility, disguised as salvation?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
• 4× higher risk of cardiorespiratory adverse events (e.g., apnea, bradycardia).
• 16× higher likelihood of abnormal CRP (C-reactive protein), indicating systemic inflammation.
• Threshold Effect: The combined antigenic and adjuvant load may exceed a critical threshold, exacerbating cytokine storms and neuronal damage.
4. Targeting vulnerable populations
Preterm infants: Immature organ systems (lungs, brain, immune function) heighten susceptibility.
Infants with genetic predispositions: Deficiencies in detoxification pathways (e.g., impaired sulfation) or mitochondrial disorders may increase toxicity risks.
How vaccines could contribute to SIDS via anaphylactic shock
Immediate hypersensitivity reaction
Some infants may have undiagnosed allergies to vaccine ingredients (e.g., egg proteins, gelatin, or latex in vial stoppers). When vaccinated, their immune system overreacts, releasing massive amounts of histamine and inflammatory mediators, causing:
• Airway obstruction (throat swelling, bronchospasm)
• Circulatory collapse (severe drop in blood pressure)
• Cardiac arrest (due to hypoxia or shock)
Delayed or subtle anaphylaxis
Some reactions may not be immediately recognized, particularly in infants who cannot communicate symptoms. A mild initial reaction (e.g., fussiness, rash) could progress to fatal respiratory or cardiac suppression hours later, resembling SIDS.
Misclassification as SIDS
• If an infant dies shortly after vaccination without obvious signs of anaphylaxis (e.g., no visible swelling or hives), the death may be labeled as SIDS rather than a vaccine-related adverse event.
• Autopsies may not always detect biochemical markers of anaphylaxis (e.g., tryptase levels), especially if testing is delayed.
Immune system over-stimulation
Vaccines are designed to provoke an immune response, but in some infants, this may lead to excessive cytokine release or dysregulation, increasing vulnerability to fatal inflammatory or autonomic dysfunction.
The cover-up: How authorities hide vaccine deaths
Before the 1960s—when mass vaccination campaigns began—"crib death" was virtually unheard of. By 1972, SIDS became the leading cause of post-neonatal mortality in the U.S. Coincidence? Or a direct consequence of injecting newborns with neurotoxic chemicals?
In 1984, Congress held hearings on vaccine safety. Donna Gary, a grieving grandmother, testified about her 8-week-old granddaughter, Lee Ann, who died hours after her DPT and polio vaccines: "Four hours later, Lee Ann was dead. 'Crib death,' the doctor said—'SIDS.' 'Could it be connected to the shot?' her parents implored. 'No.'"
Medical authorities have systematically erased vaccine deaths from the record, forcing coroners to classify them as "SIDS" or "suffocation." The CDC even removed "prophylactic vaccination" as an official cause of death—ensuring the truth stays buried.
The evidence is overwhelming: Vaccines are killing babies. The question is—how many more children must die before parents reject the lies and refuse to let their infants be poisoned?
As Dr. Thomas warns: "If you look at the six studies… 78%, if you put all six studies together, happened in the first week after the vaccine."
Will you risk your child becoming another statistic?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Florida study sparks new controversy over mRNA vaccine safety, links Pfizer vaccine to higher mortality rates than Moderna
In a study announced April 29, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo co-authored research revealing that adults in Florida who received Pfizer's mRNA vaccine were 38% more likely to die within 12 months than those who received Moderna's vaccine. The analysis, which compared nearly 1.5 million vaccine recipients and found higher rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular deaths and even deaths directly linked to COVID-19 among Pfizer users, adds to a growing but underreported debate about the unintended consequences of mRNA injections. The findings, shared as a preprint (not yet peer-reviewed), have reignited concerns about mRNA vaccine safety and efficacy, as proponents and critics clash over the implications for public health policies.
The study's alarming findings and methodology
The study, led by Ladapo alongside researchers from the Florida Department of Health and MIT, analyzed 9.2 million vaccination records of non-institutionalized Floridians who received two doses of either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine between late 2020 and mid-2021. The cohort was narrowed to 1.47 million pairs of individuals matched by age, sex, census tract and other demographic factors. Over the next year, Pfizer recipients experienced 847 deaths per 100,000 people, while Moderna recipients saw 618 deaths per 100,000—an increase driven largely by cardiovascular deaths (248.7 vs. 162.4 per 100,000) and non-COVID fatalities (791.6 vs. 588.4).
“Pfizer recipients had significantly higher mortality across nearly every category,” Ladapo told social media followers, emphasizing that this aligns with prior VA studies connecting the vaccine to heart issues. Critics, however, noted the study’s limitations, such as excluding co-morbidities and failing to directly compare vaccinated and unvaccinated groups—a point raised by University of Pennsylvania professor Jeffrey Morris. Levi, a co-author, defended the methodology, stating that comparing vaccines “controls for unobserved confounding factors” better than contrasting vaccinated/non-vaccinated populations.
The shifting narrative on vaccine safety
The findings reverberate against a backdrop of conflicting data released over the past three years. In 2023, a reanalysis of clinical trial data concluded that mRNA vaccines did not affect all-cause mortality but noted vaccinated individuals had higher rates of cardiac deaths, though offset by reduced risk of dying from severe COVID-19. Johnson & Johnson’s viral vector vaccine outperformed both in that assessment. Earlier studies using VA data also found Pfizer recipients faced higher risks of hospitalization and cardiac events, but the Florida analysis, with its larger sample and matched cohort, aims to strengthen claims of a causal link.
This context highlights a broader tension in public health. Initial vaccine efficacy claims of “over 90%” targeted only prevention mechanisms for severe illness, whereas non-specific effects—such as whether the vaccines could inadvertently harm other bodily systems — were largely ignored. Ladapo, a vocal critic of the mRNA platform’s long-term impact, has previously argued that these vaccines act more like gene therapies than traditional vaccines, which typically produce far greater protective immunity (around 99%) sustained for decades.
Implications for health freedom advocacy and policy
The study has galvanized health freedom advocates, who argue that the public was misled about mRNA vaccines’ risks. “The messaging early on painted these shots as near-miraculous, but the reality is murkier,” said one advocate. Ladapo’s social media post, stating the vaccine system is “rotten” and urging scrutiny of non-specific effects, reflects this sentiment. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Moderna were unresponsive to media requests, leaving unanswered questions about whether manufacturers have reviewed mortality data.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Real-time vaccine injury tracking system aims to address “regulatory malpractice” in U.S. surveillance
U.S. health officials announced a major overhaul of the nation’s vaccine safety monitoring system, replacing the widely criticized Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) with a real-time data system using electronic health records (EHRs). The move, spearheaded by Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, seeks to address longstanding concerns about VAERS’s ineffectiveness, which an HHS spokesperson described as “a template of regulatory malpractice” capturing fewer than 1% of actual vaccine-related injuries.
The new system, leveraging Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) — networks that share EHR data among medical providers — will enable the FDA and CDC to monitor adverse events as they occur, replacing VAERS’s outdated reliance on self-reported data. Kennedy, a longtime critic of VAERS, emphasized the need for transparency in his Feb. 14 remarks on Fox News: “We need to know the risk profile of these products,” he stated. With over 500 million vaccine doses administered annually in the U.S., the initiative addresses a demand for accountability as public distrust in vaccine safety grows amid rising rates of chronic conditions such as autism and autoimmune disorders.
From 1% to real-time: closing the data gap
The push for reform stems from a decades-long backlog in vaccine safety reporting. Harvard Medical School researchers revealed in 2006 that VAERS underreported injuries by a factor of 100, a gap Kennedy highlighted as “outrageous” at a March “Make America Healthy Again” event in Indiana. “We’re going to find out what contribution vaccines and everything else — mold, electromagnetic fields, food — began in the late 1980s — whichever are the culprits,” he said, calling for a data-driven approach to distinguish between vaccine side effects and environmental risks.
The FDA’s plan now uses EHRs to capture “the full clinical landscape” of patients’ health pre-, during and post-vaccination, according to Trial Site News founder Daniel O’Connor. Unlike VAERS, which relies on delayed, incomplete, or unverified reports, EHRs allow algorithms to flag patterns — such as sudden rises in myocarditis or autoimmune flares — in near real time. “VAERS catches the sparks, but not the fire,” O’Connor said. The system will also enable comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts to isolate risks, a capability VAERS lacks without external data.
Kennedy’s sub-agency within the CDC, announced in March, will focus on expanding this surveillance to include genetic factors influencing adverse reactions, as noted by Children’s Health Defense scientist Karl Jablonowski. “Interfacing HIE systems could reveal associations between DNA markers and outcomes,” he explained, potentially paving the way for personalized vaccination strategies.
Modernizing trust in public health
Critics of VAERS have long accused the system of perpetuating a “false illusion of vigilance,” as Jablonowski described it. Even proponents of traditional vaccine safety, such as FDA Commissioner Makary, concede the need for drastic modernization. On SiriusXM, Makary highlighted EHRs’ power to analyze 100,000 patient records concurrently, allowing regulators to quantify events like hospital readmissions within days of a shot. “Real science demands transparency and accountability,” an HHS spokesperson added, framing the shift as a return to empirical rigor.
But the overhaul faces hurdles. Transparency advocates stress that the new system must remain open to public scrutiny, not another “closed system” run by contractors or opaque officials. “Without accountability, we risk insanity — same failures, same results,” warned VAERS expert Albert Benavides. Privacy concerns also persist, with immunologist Jessica Rose noting that anonymized data “could…become accessible by anyone.” HHS has not yet finalized protocols to address these issues.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
DTaP vaccine failure exposed: Vaccinated children 15x more likely to spread whooping cough, study finds
The DTaP vaccine — touted as essential for preventing diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough) — actually puts children at greater risk to the targeted diseases, and makes them more likely to contract and carry pertussis (whooping cough). The latest research confirms what truth-tellers have warned for years: the vaccine is a catastrophic failure, leaving vaccinated children up to 15 times more likely to contract whooping cough within five years compared to their unvaccinated peers.
Even more alarming, vaccinated individuals are now confirmed to be silent carriers of pertussis, spreading the bacteria through their nasal passages while evading symptoms — directly contradicting the media’s relentless fearmongering about the "dangerous unvaccinated."
• Peer-reviewed studies reveal DTaP vaccine increases whooping cough risk in children by 15x
• Vaccinated individuals more likely to carry and spread pertussis, contradicting mainstream narratives
• Death risk from DTaP vaccine (1 in 76,000) far exceeds whooping cough fatality rate (1 in 2 million)
• Medical establishment continues to blame unvaccinated despite overwhelming evidence of vaccine failure
The great vaccine deception unravels
For decades, public health officials and pharmaceutical profiteers have peddled the lie that mass vaccination is the only way to prevent outbreaks. Yet the data tells a different story. As Dr. Paul Thomas, a courageous physician unafraid to challenge the medical orthodoxy, explains:
"The risk of death from whooping cough is less than one in 2 million. The risk of death from the vaccine is greater than one in 76,000. The vaccine is killing far more kids."
Let that sink in. The DTaP vaccine isn’t just ineffective — it’s deadlier than the disease it claims to prevent. And yet, the medical-industrial complex continues to push it on unsuspecting parents, while censoring doctors who dare to expose the truth.
Who’s really spreading whooping cough?
The mainstream narrative crumbles under scrutiny. Far from being a threat to public health, the unvaccinated are being scapegoated to cover up vaccine failure. As the study confirms:
"It's the vaccinated who are probably the greatest risk [of spreading whooping cough] because they're more likely to harbor pertussis in their nasal pharynx."
This isn’t a minor oversight—it’s a systemic betrayal. With vaccination rates hovering around 94-95%, outbreaks are still occurring. Why? Because the vaccine does not prevent transmission. Instead, it creates a generation of asymptomatic carriers, silently infecting the vulnerable while Big Pharma pockets billions.
A disturbing resurgence of whooping cough (pertussis) is sweeping through nations that rely on acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, with mounting evidence pointing to the shots' rapidly waning effectiveness and flawed immune priming. Unlike the older whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines, which trigger robust Th1/Th17 immune responses, the newer aP vaccines skew immunity toward weaker Th1/Th2 pathways—leaving children vulnerable within just 2–3 years after booster doses.
While health authorities scramble to blame "better diagnosis" or "more virulent strains," the real culprit appears to be the vaccine itself. Research confirms that aP vaccines fail to provide lasting protection, with effectiveness plummeting post-boosters. Even more alarming, baboon studies—though not yet confirmed in humans—suggest aP vaccines may not even prevent Bordetella pertussis from colonizing the nasopharynx, unlike natural infection or the older wP formula.
Despite offering short-term defense in early childhood, the aP vaccine’s artificial immunity fades fast, leaving populations at risk. With vaccine-induced protection collapsing after mere years, the medical establishment’s reliance on these inferior shots may be fueling — not preventing — the very outbreaks they claim to control.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
The polio vaccine deception: How a tainted medical experiment unleashed cancer, autoimmune disease, and the very epidemic it claimed to stop
In 1959, Dr. Bernice Eddy, a dedicated researcher at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), made a chilling discovery: the polio vaccines being injected into millions of children were contaminated with SV-40, a monkey virus linked to cancer. When she attempted to warn the public, her findings were suppressed, her lab confiscated, and her career derailed. By the time the truth emerged, it was too late—98 million Americans had already been exposed to the carcinogenic virus. Decades later, SV-40 has been detected in brain tumors, bone cancers, and leukemias, leaving a deadly legacy in its wake.
This was no accident. Government officials, pharmaceutical companies, and public health agencies knew the risks—yet they prioritized profit and public perception over safety. Worse, the polio vaccine itself triggered outbreaks, with states like Massachusetts seeing a 642% spike in cases post-inoculation. By the 1980s, 100% of U.S. polio cases were caused by the vaccine. And in a disturbing twist, the monkey kidneys used in vaccine production may have introduced SIV, the precursor to HIV, raising alarming questions about the origins of AIDS.
The polio vaccine scandal is one of the greatest medical betrayals in history—a story of corporate greed, government cover-ups, and lives destroyed.
Key points:
• Cancer-linked SV-40 virus contaminated polio vaccines, infecting millions—now detected in brain tumors, bone cancers, and leukemia.
• Government cover-up: Scientists who exposed the contamination were silenced, demoted, or dismissed.
• Polio cases surged post-vaccine: States like Massachusetts saw a 642% spike after mass inoculations.
• Vaccine-induced polio: By the 1980s, 100% of U.S. polio cases were caused by the vaccine itself.
• HIV connection: Monkey kidneys used in vaccines carried SIV, a precursor to HIV, raising questions about the origins of AIDS.
The deadly legacy of SV-40
From 1955 to 1963, 98 million Americans were injected with SV-40-laced vaccines. Decades later, the virus has been found in 58% of mesothelioma cases, 38% of bone cancers, and a significant percentage of brain tumors and leukemias. Dr. Michele Carbone, a leading pathologist, confirmed SV-40’s role in disabling tumor-suppressing proteins, effectively turbocharging cancer growth.
"It was a frightening discovery... We had no idea what this virus would do," admitted Dr. Ben Sweet, one of the researchers who uncovered SV-40 in vaccines.
From paralysis to profit
The polio vaccine’s rollout was a masterclass in corporate fraud and government collusion. Despite paralysis outbreaks directly tied to vaccinations—like the 266% spike in Vermont and 642% surge in Massachusetts—health officials doubled down.
Dr. Jonas Salk, the vaccine’s creator, privately admitted, "When you inoculate children with a polio vaccine, you don’t sleep well for two or three weeks." Yet, the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (funded by Big Pharma) strong-armed the CDC into declaring the vaccine "safe."
By the 1970s, Dr. Salk himself testified that the oral polio vaccine had become the sole cause of polio in America. CDC data later confirmed: 87% of polio cases in the 1970s-80s, and 100% by 1989, were vaccine-induced.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Despite Baric’s later claims that engineering transmissible viruses was "too edgy," his involvement in DEFUSE and subsequent vaccine research suggests he may have been aware of the risks. The evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 being an engineered virus that escaped from a U.S.-China collaborative research project, with the WIV serving as the site of accidental release.
This scenario explains why Chinese authorities quickly locked down Wuhan—possibly realizing the virus was lab-made—and why Shi Zhengli, a prominent WIV virologist, rushed to publish data on a natural bat virus (RaTG13) to distance her lab from the outbreak.
While direct proof is lacking, the convergence of DEFUSE, PREEMPT, and CREID research, along with lab anomalies and key resignations, strongly suggests a lab origin for COVID-19—one that U.S. and Chinese officials have sought to obscure.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Shifting demographics further complicate bonds
Rural and urban dynamics also influence loneliness. The Gallup-Meta study notes that younger rural populations report slightly less loneliness than their urban counterparts, suggesting that accessibility of communal spaces matters. However, mobility limitations in cities, such as cost-of-living pressures, may reduce opportunities for casual interactions.
"When you can't afford to live near family or friends, you're essentially stranded," said Mira Torres, a social worker in Los Angeles, echoing concerns about affordability deepening alienation.
Tech giants face scrutiny. Meta, the study's co-sponsor, has faced criticism for designing addictive platforms that exacerbate isolation.
"They profit from time spent scrolling, not conversations," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), echoing Senate hearings on social media's impacts. Yet Meta's research director, Javier Oliva, claims their work "aims to understand, not address," noting the company funds mental wellness programs. Critics argue that monetization strategies must evolve alongside this awareness.
Mental health professionals are expanding treatments. Loneliness clinics, as reported by The Lancet, now integrate group therapy and social skill training.
"We're moving beyond individual therapy to build shared spaces," said Dr. Sara Elson, a loneliness clinic director in London. Meanwhile, startup Singularity6 uses VR avatars for neurodivergent individuals to practice real-world interactions – a hybrid approach acknowledging some benefits of technology.
The Gallup-Meta study amplifies a clarion call to reimagine modern society. With loneliness linked to early mortality risks comparable to smoking, experts argue it's a public health emergency requiring policy action and cultural shifts. As former Surgeon General Murthy warned, "Technology can't be our default. To rebuild, we must rethink vulnerability – not as a weakness but as a gateway to belonging."
Watch the video below that talks about combating loneliness.
https://www.brighteon.com/1227efff-c24e-4e40-8cd3-fb93c5d5c629
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA reconsiders COVID-19 booster approvals, with Makary emphasizing the need for “good data”
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reevaluating its approach to approving Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines for the upcoming winter season, citing a lack of data on booster effectiveness and declining public confidence in vaccination recommendations.
FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, in interviews with CBS News and MedPage Today, emphasized the need for robust clinical evidence before endorsing new boosters. His stance is a notable shift from the rapid approvals seen during the Biden administration.
"I think there's a void of data," Makary told CBS News on Tuesday, April 29. "Rather than allow that void to be filled with opinions, I’d like to see some good data."
In a separate interview with MedPage Today Editor-in-Chief Dr. Jeremy Faust also published on Tuesday, Makary acknowledged that public trust toward vaccines has eroded. He pointed to low uptake among healthcare workers and skepticism about vaccinating low-risk children.
"Look, 85 percent of healthcare workers declined the latest COVID-19 booster vaccine last fall," Makary told Faust. "Should we accept that and just keep pounding on parents to get their healthy 12-year-old daughter a seventh COVID-19 jab this fall?"
The high-stakes debate over vaccine approvals
The regulator's hesitation comes as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) considers narrowing its vaccine guidelines, potentially moving from universal recommendations to a risk-based approach. The CDC's advisory committee is now debating whether to limit recommendations to high-risk groups, a move that could mark a significant policy reversal.
Makary's stance reflects growing scrutiny of past approval processes, such as the FDA’s 2022 authorization of Omicron-targeted boosters for children as young as five without direct safety or efficacy data. But the FDA's demand for new trials has drawn criticism from pharmaceutical companies and former officials.
Novavax, which expected full approval by April 1, now faces delays and millions in costs for additional research. Former FDA leaders Phil Krause and Luciana Borio argued in a commentary that the agency should "stick to its normal processes," warning that shifting standards could deter innovation.
But Makary defended the decision – citing lessons from past failures like Merck's Vioxx, a painkiller linked to thousands of deaths after its rushed approval. "I'd rather have a sound decision a few days after the target date than have another Vioxx," he said.
The debate underscores broader tensions in public health policy. While Makary and CDC advisors push for evidence-based adjustments, critics fear inconsistent messaging will deepen vaccine hesitancy. The outcome could reshape COVID-19 strategies ahead of the winter season – and set a precedent for how regulators balance speed, science and public trust in future health crises. As the FDA weighs its next steps, the spotlight remains on whether stricter data requirements will restore confidence or further polarize the nation’s approach to pandemic preparedness.
For now, Makary's mantra is clear: "Upholding gold standard science" comes before corporate or political pressures. The question is whether that standard will be enough to mend a fractured public health landscape.
Watch Dr. Marty Makary disclosing to Tucker Carlson that public health officials are proposing annual COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations for all people in this clip from Fox News.
https://www.brighteon.com/20be1eef-da56-4e56-996e-3f0c004f12f1
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. mandates PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS for new vaccines, exposing decades of Big Pharma deception
For decades, the vaccine industry has operated in the shadows, bypassing the gold standard of science — placebo-controlled trials — to push untested, unsafe products onto the public. Now, in a historic move, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is forcing a reckoning. Under a new rule, all future vaccines must be tested against a true placebo — an inert substance like saline — before approval. This bombshell decision, first reported by The Washington Post, shatters the pharmaceutical industry’s most guarded deception: the use of fake placebos to hide vaccine injuries.
Key points:
• HHS confirms all new vaccines must undergo placebo-controlled testing, a radical shift from past fraud.
• RFK Jr. and health freedom advocates demand scientific integrity, while Pharma-funded "experts" cry foul.
• Decades of corrupt vaccine testing exposed: No childhood vaccine ever tested against true placebo.
• Medical establishment panics as new rule threatens to reveal vaccine injuries hidden by rigged trials.
The great vaccine deception: How Big Pharma rigged the science
For years, vaccine manufacturers have avoided real placebo testing by using another vaccine or a toxic adjuvant-laden solution as the "control." This fraudulent practice ensures that both groups in clinical trials receive harmful substances, masking the true rate of adverse events. As Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Senior Research Scientist Karl Jablonowski explained, this rigged system makes it impossible to determine if a new vaccine is truly safe.
Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, a leading voice for medical transparency, called the new rule "long overdue."
"All new vaccine products and combinations of existing vaccines should be tested in large prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group trials with long-term outcomes," McCullough said. "This is standard for pharmaceuticals and it should be no different for vaccines."
Yet, predictably, the medical establishment — deeply entangled with Big Pharma profits — is outraged. The Washington Post cited unnamed "experts" who claimed placebo testing "could limit access to vaccines" and even be "unethical."
Calley Means, an adviser to Kennedy, fired back: "Why would ‘health experts’ be alarmed at conducting science on new drugs?"
Why aren’t existing vaccines held to the same standard?
Kennedy has long exposed a shocking truth: Not a single vaccine on the CDC’s childhood schedule was ever tested against a true placebo. Instead, they were rubber-stamped through fraudulent trials designed to conceal injuries.
Now, the critical question remains: Will this new rule apply to existing vaccines?
Dr. David Wohl, a Pfizer-affiliated infectious disease specialist, argued that placebo trials are "unethical" for diseases with existing vaccines—a stance that reeks of corporate protectionism. Meanwhile, Daniel O’Connor of Trial Site News suggested a "risk-based approach," allowing placebo testing only for novel pathogens.
But why the double standard? If vaccines are as safe as claimed, why fear real science?
The HHS has not yet clarified whether the rule will apply to COVID-19 boosters, which have been fast-tracked with minimal safety data. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary recently admitted the agency lacks sufficient evidence to approve new boosters, yet manufacturers are already pushing for 2025 formulations.
Kennedy is also pushing to remove COVID shots from the childhood schedule, citing a lack of benefit for young children. If successful, this could mark the beginning of the end for one of the most disastrous medical experiments in history.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Rubio exposes Biden’s surveillance of American dissent: Outrageous free speech violations
In a stunning revelation with implications for free speech and government overreach, Secretary of State Marco Rubio disclosed on April 30, 2025, that the Biden administration’s State Department maintained secret dossiers labeling American citizens as “vectors of disinformation.” Among the targets was an unnamed Trump-era cabinet official, underscoring an alleged campaign to stifle dissent through systemic censorship. The project, tied to the disbanded Global Engagement Center (GEC), has ignited fierce debate over executive branch authority, constitutional rights and the role of government in policing online speech.
Rubio’s bombshell came during a high-profile Cabinet meeting with President Donald Trump, where he revealed the existence of taxpayer-funded GEC files that monitored social media posts to marginalized individuals and outlets critical of the Biden White House. Vice President J.D. Vance wryly joked, “Was it me or Elon [Musk]?”, before quipping that the matter would be addressed post-meeting—drawing laughter but underscoring the surreal nature of the disclosure. The State Department’s actions, once justified as a tool to counter foreign propaganda, have transmuted into a partisan battleground over civil liberties.
The global engagement center: From counter-terror tool to domestic censorship fixture
Established by President Barack Obama in 2016 through Executive Order 13727, the GEC initially aimed to counter terrorism-related disinformation abroad. By 2020, however, its mandate expanded to include domestic censorship, particularly during the pandemic. The center funded entities like the Global Disinformation Index, which labeled outlets such as Newsmax and the New York Post as “high risk,” a move criticized as politically motivated suppression of conservative voices.
Elon Musk, now in a government advisory role, slammed the GEC in 2023 as “the worst offender in U.S. government censorship,” citing its efforts to frame dissent as “Russian disinformation.” The center’s controversial pivot became starkly evident in the “disinfo cloud” project, a State Department initiative to develop censorship tools disseminated to Big Tech firms ahead of the 2020 election—a program unmasked by journalist Matt Taibbi’s reporting on leaked Twitter files.
By 2024, GEC’s budget—$50 million annually—still lacked transparency, prompting its elimination in the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act. Yet Biden’s team rebranded it as the Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Hub (CFIMI) days before Trump’s 2025 inauguration. Rubio shut CFIMI in April, calling it an offense to civil liberties. “The department actively silenced Americans it was meant to serve,” he said, emphasizing its antithesis to democratic principles.
The dossier on a Trump official
Rubio declined to name the Trump-era official surveilled by the GEC, instead vowing to release the dossier directly to them. “There’s at least one person at this table today who had a dossier of their social media posts identifying them as a purveyor of disinformation,” Rubio stated, leaving the individual to decide publicizing the findings. Multiple Trump allies, including Musk, have long been targets of GEC scrutiny.
Conservative critics view the dossier program as unconstitutional overreach. Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI) denounced the GEC at a recent hearing for “suppressing free speech using taxpayer dollars,” accusing it of serving as a watchdog for ideological enemies. Conversely, GEC defenders argue it combated foreign threats, citing reports on Russian misinformation in Africa and China’s $1 trillion media buildup. Former GEC director/statistician John Smith (a pseudonym used in previous reports) claims national security required “aggressive action” against pro-China narratives, a stance critics dismiss as broad overreach.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
HHS, NIH waste $500 million on failed universal vaccine scheme as respiratory viruses continue to mutate beyond vaccine efficacy
The U.S. government is doubling down on failed vaccine science, pouring half a billion taxpayer dollars into a futile quest for "universal" vaccines against influenza and coronaviruses. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced the "Generation Gold Standard" initiative, a repackaged version of Biden’s failed Project NextGen, which itself was a continuation of the disastrous Operation Warp Speed.
Despite decades of evidence showing that respiratory viruses mutate too quickly for vaccines to keep up, bureaucrats and captured scientists are pushing forward with beta-propiolactone (BPL)-inactivated whole-virus vaccines—a 70-year-old technology that has never delivered on the promise of universal protection.
Key Points:
• HHS and NIH invest $500 million in "Generation Gold Standard," a revamped universal vaccine program using outdated BPL-inactivated virus technology.
• Experts warn the approach is scientifically flawed, as respiratory viruses mutate too rapidly for any vaccine to provide lasting immunity.
• Placebo-controlled trials may finally expose the risks of these vaccines, but taxpayer funds are being wasted on a doomed project.
• Independent scientists argue the program is another Big Pharma handout disguised as innovation, despite claims of government-led transparency.
A recycled failure, repackaged as innovation
The NIH’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya called the program a "paradigm shift," but independent scientists aren’t buying it. Dr. Meryl Nass, a longtime vaccine safety advocate, told The Defender: "This holy grail in vaccinology has been sought for decades, so far unsuccessfully. The press release fails to tell us how this method is suddenly going to produce the holy grail."
BPL technology, while safer than mRNA, still carries risks. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher of the McCullough Foundation cautioned: "Any injectable product delivering toxic antigens—even if inactivated—can still result in serious adverse events, especially if distributed at scale without rigorous long-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials."
HHS claims all new vaccines will now undergo placebo-controlled testing—a tacit admission that previous COVID-19 vaccines were rushed without proper safety checks. But will this be enforced, or is it just another empty promise?
Key features of the BPL-inactivated whole-virus platform:
The beta-propiolactone (BPL)-inactivated, whole-virus platform is a vaccine production method that uses chemically inactivated whole viruses to induce an immune response. Here’s how it works and why it’s significant:
Whole-virus approach
• Unlike subunit vaccines (e.g., hepatitis B’s surface antigen), this method uses the entire virus, preserving all structural proteins (including those not present in subunit vaccines).
• This can lead to a broader immune response, as multiple viral antigens are presented to the immune system.
Inactivation with beta-propiolactone (BPL)
• BPL is a chemical agent that irreversibly damages viral genetic material (RNA/DNA), rendering the virus non-infectious while keeping its protein structure intact.
• Compared to other inactivating agents (e.g., formaldehyde), BPL is less likely to disrupt critical antigenic epitopes, ensuring better immune recognition.
Safety & efficacy
• Since the virus is fully inactivated, there is no risk of replication or infection (unlike live-attenuated vaccines).
• The preserved viral structure helps stimulate both antibody (humoral) and T-cell (cellular) immune responses, which can be crucial for long-term protection.
Examples of use
• Historically used in rabies vaccines (e.g., the original Salk rabies vaccine).
• Also employed in some COVID-19 vaccines (e.g., Sinopharm’s BBIBP-CorV) and influenza vaccines.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
BREAKING: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard confirms task force is investigating Fauci’s role in COVID-19 origins
As the world grapples with the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic - including a slew of totalitarian medical mandates, lockdowns, censorship, fraudulent testing programs, and failed vaccine platforms, a disturbing narrative unfolds behind the scenes. For years, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the face of the U.S. response to the crisis, has been at the heart of a web of deception, lies, and catastrophic experiments.
Now, thanks to the courageous efforts of former Congresswoman and Director of National Intelligence (DNI) candidate Tulsi Gabbard, the truth is on a path of reconciliation and the historic record is being corrected. The intelligence community is actively investigating Fauci's role in funding gain-of-function research, deemed so dangerous that it was banned in the U.S. from 2014 to 2017. This narrative challenges everything we've been told about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and calls into question the integrity of those who have led the response.
Gain-of-function research: a platform for global medical experimentation
Gain-of-function research involves manipulating viruses in labs to enhance their potency and spread, supposedly to better understand and counteract their threat. However, critics argue that the risks far outweigh the benefits, as these enhanced viruses could escape the lab and cause a pandemic. The U.S. government banned this type of research in 2014 due to its potential catastrophic consequences. It is the perfect platform to create vaccines and testing programs preemptively, to gain power and profit from.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard's revelation: In an interview, Gabbard revealed that the U.S. intelligence community is probing American taxpayer-funded research that may have been involved in the creation of COVID-19. This research, conducted under the guise of gain-of-function, involved manipulating viruses to increase their ability to infect human cells.
Wuhan Institute of Virology: The obvious source
At the heart of this investigation lies the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China. This lab, funded by the U.S. through the EcoHealth Alliance, conducted controversial gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Controversial experiments: WIV researchers, including Shi Zhengli, have been studying bat coronaviruses and manipulating their genetic makeup to make them more lethal and contagious. Some of these experiments, funded by U.S. taxpayers through the National Institutes of Health (NIH), resemble the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.
"Absurd" coincidence: The timeline and location of these experiments coincide eerily with the first reported cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan. While some scientists argue that a natural spillover is plausible, the potential link between WIV's research and the pandemic warrants serious investigation.
Fauci's involvement: From funds and boasting to denials and coverups
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has been a key figure in U.S. pandemic response and a prominent denier of the lab-leak theory. However, evidence suggests that his involvement in funding the very research that may have caused the pandemic goes far beyond mere oversight. The bioterror was planned, the so-called vaccines were prepared beforehand, and coronavirus gain-of-function experiments became a pandemic that public health officials like Fauci would glean power and profit from.
Funding WIV's gain-of-function research: Through EcoHealth Alliance, NIAID, led by Fauci, provided grants totaling nearly $600,000 to WIV for research on bat coronaviruses between 2015 and 2019. This funding, approved by Fauci, helped facilitate the risky experiments that may have led to the COVID-19 outbreak.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
RFK Jr. shatters mainstream narratives on measles, sparks heated debate on vaccines and autism
In the latest chapter of America’s polarized health debate, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has ignited intense controversy by redirecting public attention away from the current measles outbreak — a topic dominating headlines — to chronic diseases now claiming millions. In a NewsNation interview, Kennedy confronted mainstream media bias, stating, “We’ve had four measles deaths in 20 years. We have 100,000 autism cases a year… [but] the media never covers them.” His remarks, met with audience applause, highlighted a simmering conflict between his health freedom advocacy and the traditional scientific consensus.
Kennedy’s stark contrast between measles and autism prioritization resonates with a growing movement challenging vaccine mandates and Big Pharma influence. “Autism rates have skyrocketed — not from media surveillance, but from real crises,” he added, citing 1 in 31 U.S. children now diagnosed with autism versus the pre-vaccine era’s 1 in 10,000. His message aligns with grassroots efforts such as the Autism Health Summit, a conference promoting holistic healing approaches, and the Medic Alerts for Humanity (MaHA) Alliance, a decentralized movement advocating health autonomy.
The autism connection: From personal tragedy to political action
Kennedy’s advocacy is deeply rooted in personal experience. His nephew, Congressman Jack Kennedy, died at 27 after suffering side effects from an experimental drug, a tragedy Kennedy links to broader systemic failures. This pain fuels his crusade against pharmaceutical interests. Similarly, advocacy groups point to vaccine injury stories, such as that of Tracy’s son Noah — vaccine injured after his first MMR shot — whose journey mirrors thousands of cases parents attribute to vaccines. “They told me it was an allergic reaction… but specialists now say he contracted measles from the vaccine itself,” one parent testified.
These narratives underpin Kennedy’s claim that environmental factors, including industrial toxins and vaccine adjuvants, play a key role in neurodevelopmental disorders. “Our focus must shift to healing,” said Tracy, co-founder of the Autism Health Summit, emphasizing dietary changes, hyperbaric oxygen therapy and detoxification methods. Kennedy’s push for “rigorous science” on vaccine safety — and open opposition to industry ties — aligns with this movement, despite dismissals from mainstream medicine.
Measles through history: A cautionary tale of vaccines and liberty
Historians note that measles was historically a benign rite of passage, with most children recovering fully. Pre-vaccine U.S. case fatality rates were as low as 1 in 10,000, and lifelong immunity was the norm. The current vaccine, while reducing acute outbreaks, offers only temporary protection, with vaccinated individuals now accounting for approximately 50% of U.S. measles cases since 2019. “Natural immunity is superior,” Kennedy argued, adding that modern malnutrition (citing West Texas’s food deserts) may exacerbate complications—a claim disputed by local physicians who call the Mennonite community “nutritionally robust.”
Critics, like Dr. Sean O’Leary of the American Academy of Pediatrics, counter that vaccines dramatically cut measles deaths and hospitalizations. However, Kennedy’s camp cites U.S. vaccine injury compensation records listing nearly 900 MMR claims since 2012, compared to zero natural measles fatalities post-2003. “This vaccine is a profit-driven experiment,” declares health freedom activist Mark, “When natural remedies like cod liver oil or steroids ‘instantly cure’ measles, why force risky shots?”
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Bombshell study reveals Pfizer’s vaccine linked to 38% higher all-cause mortality compared to Moderna, raising urgent questions about FDA’s reckless approval
A bombshell Florida study of 1.47 million adults has exposed a chilling disparity in mRNA vaccine safety, with Pfizer’s BNT162b2 linked to a 38% higher all-cause death rate compared to Moderna’s formula—unleashing a storm of cardiovascular fatalities, COVID-19 deaths, and unexplained mortality. While Moderna’s vaccine appeared marginally less lethal, newly unredacted documents reveal both companies and the FDA concealed evidence of antibody-dependent enhancement and tragic outcomes, including a 23% fetal and neonatal death rate among vaccinated mothers. With Pfizer’s fast-tracked approval now looking like a catastrophic lapse in judgment, the data paints a damning portrait of profit over lives—raising the harrowing question: were these vaccines ever safe at all?
Key points:
• A Florida-based study of 1.47 million matched adults found Pfizer’s BNT162b2 vaccine increased all-cause mortality by 38% compared to Moderna’s mRNA-1273.
• Pfizer recipients faced 54% higher cardiovascular deaths, 88% higher COVID-19 deaths, and 36% higher non-COVID deaths within 12 months.
• The FDA fast-tracked Pfizer’s vaccine in August 2021 despite known risks—now, the data exposes a lethal betrayal of public trust.
• Moderna’s formula showed comparatively lower mortality, suggesting not all mRNA vaccines are equally dangerous—but neither may be safe.
The FDA’s fatal gamble
In a damning indictment of the pharmaceutical-industrial complex, a peer-reviewed study of Florida residents has uncovered horrifying evidence that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine—rushed to market under the FDA’s corrupt Emergency Use Authorization—may have systematically killed thousands. The research, analyzing 1.47 million matched adults, reveals that those who took Pfizer’s BNT162b2 faced a staggering 38% higher risk of death from any cause within a year compared to Moderna recipients. Cardiovascular deaths skyrocketed by 54%, COVID-19 deaths by 88%, and non-COVID fatalities by 36%.
“These findings are suggestive of differential non-specific effects of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines, and potential concerning adverse effects on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality,” the study concludes. Translation: Pfizer’s shot isn’t just ineffective—it’s actively deadly.
A conspiracy of silence
The study, published on medRxiv, meticulously matched subjects by age, race, vaccination site, and even neighborhood (census tract) to eliminate confounding variables. Yet the results were unambiguous: Pfizer’s vaccine is statistically linked to excess deaths. Negative control analyses ruled out bias, leaving only one grim conclusion—the shots themselves are to blame.
This isn’t just a scientific scandal; it’s a criminal betrayal. The FDA and CDC, fully aware of Pfizer’s fraudulent clinical trial data and hidden adverse events, green-lit this bioweapon while silencing dissent. Internal documents previously leaked from Pfizer’s own trials revealed thousands of unreported severe reactions, including deaths. Now, the bodies are piling up—and the government’s response is to bury the evidence.
Moderna: A lesser evil?
While some data suggest Moderna’s mortality rates are lower, the broader picture reveals alarming risks that should not be ignored. Both mRNA vaccines—Moderna and Pfizer—pose serious, long-term health threats due to their experimental nature, toxic spike protein production, and potential for DNA integration.
Both mRNA vaccines force cells to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, a known pathogenic agent linked to:
• Blood clotting disorders (microthrombi, strokes, heart attacks)
• Chronic inflammation (leading to autoimmune diseases)
• Potential integration into human DNA (via reverse transcription, as shown in studies on LINE-1 retrotransposons)
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
BREAKING: Czech study reveals 30% drop in birth rates among COVID-vaccinated women, exposing fertility crisis ignored by mainstream media
A groundbreaking study of 1.3 million Czech women has uncovered alarming evidence linking COVID-19 vaccination to a staggering 30% drop in birth rates—a revelation that could reshape the global conversation on vaccine safety and fertility. While unvaccinated women maintained a stable fertility rate of 10 live births per 1,000 in late 2021, their vaccinated counterparts saw a dramatic plunge to just 6 per 1,000—a disparity that persisted for over a year. Even more striking? Despite making up 39% of the population by mid-2021, vaccinated women accounted for a mere 7% of live births between 2021 and 2023. Researchers are now sounding the alarm, calling the findings "hypothesis-generating" and demanding urgent investigation into the potential long-term reproductive consequences of these shots. Yet, as the data paints an increasingly concerning picture, governments and mainstream media remain eerily silent—raising urgent questions about what else isn’t being told.
Key findings:
• A landmark study of 1.3 million Czech women aged 18-39 reveals a 30% decline in birth rates among those vaccinated against COVID-19.
• Unvaccinated women maintained stable fertility rates, peaking at 10 live births per 1,000 women in late 2021, while vaccinated women plummeted to 6 per 1,000—a disparity lasting over a year.
• The study, analyzing data from January 2021 to March 2023, found vaccinated women contributed just 7% of live births despite making up 39% of the population by mid-2021.
• Researchers warn of a "hypothesis-generating" link between COVID shots and reduced fertility, demanding urgent investigation—yet governments and media remain silent.
The silent war on fertility
When the COVID-19 vaccines were rushed to market under emergency authorization, pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials. Despite this, health authorities—led by the CDC, WHO, and pharmaceutical giants—recklessly promoted vaccination for expectant mothers, dismissing concerns as "misinformation." Now, the devastating consequences are undeniable.
The Czech study, published on Preprints. org, exposes a chilling correlation: Women who received COVID-19 vaccines before conception saw their birth rates collapse by nearly one-third compared to their unvaccinated peers. The data, sourced from the Czech Republic’s national health registry, reveals a sustained fertility drop from February 2022 onward—precisely as mass vaccination campaigns reached critical saturation.
"SCs [successful conceptions] per 1,000 women were considerably lower for women vaccinated before conception," the authors state, bluntly adding that the findings "call for further studies" on COVID-19 vaccines' impact on fertility.
A pattern of suppression and deceit
This isn’t an isolated red flag. Previous studies have documented:
• 1,200% increase in menstrual irregularities post-vaccination
• 57-fold rise in miscarriages among vaccinated women
• 38-fold spike in fetal deaths following COVID-19 injections
Yet, instead of sounding alarms, regulatory agencies and corporate media continue parroting the lie that these experimental gene therapies are "safe and effective." The Czech data directly contradicts this narrative, revealing a biological catastrophe unfolding in plain sight—one that threatens the very future of human reproduction.
The global elite’s obsession with population control is no secret. From Bill Gates’ infamous TED Talk advocating vaccines to "reduce population growth" to the Rockefeller Foundation’s decades-long depopulation agenda, the pieces fit together.
Now, with birth rates crashing worldwide—Germany, Sweden, the UK, and the U.S. all report record-low fertility—the question must be asked: Was this the plan all along?
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Shocking study confirms 78% of SIDS cases occur within first week after vaccination – the deadly link Big Pharma doesn’t want you to know
For decades, grieving parents have been gaslit by the medical establishment, told their child’s sudden death was a tragic but random event—just "bad luck." But a bombshell analysis of VAERS data and peer-reviewed research exposes the horrifying truth: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is not random. It is statistically linked to vaccination, with 78% of cases occurring within the first week after shots.
Key points:
• 78% of SIDS cases occur within 7 days of vaccination, according to six separate studies.
• Infant deaths are routinely misclassified as "SIDS" or "suffocation" to hide vaccine-related fatalities.
• Vaccine adjuvants like aluminum may cross the blood-brain barrier, disrupting respiratory control in infants.
• Before mass vaccination programs, "crib death" was so rare it wasn’t even recorded in mortality statistics.
• Dr. Paul Thomas warns: "These vaccines are killing infants… You take your healthy infant into the office and you find them dead."
The undeniable correlation: Vaccines and infant death
A 2021 study published in Toxicology Reports analyzed 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS between 1990 and 2019. The findings were damning:
• 58% of deaths occurred within 3 days of vaccination.
• 78.3% occurred within 7 days.
• Day 2 post-vaccination saw a 69-fold increase in deaths compared to baseline expectations.
"The excess of deaths during these early post-vaccination periods was statistically significant (p < 0.00001)," the researchers concluded.
Dr. Paul Thomas, a pediatrician and author of Vax Facts, has witnessed this tragedy firsthand:
"You took a healthy baby into the office and they got a series of vaccines… You find them dead. The most deaths happen in the first day after the vaccine. Day zero, okay? That's vaccine, healthy kid, vaccinated, dead."
How vaccines may be killing babies
The study outlines several mechanisms by which vaccines could trigger fatal respiratory failure in infants:
1. Inflammatory cytokines disrupt brainstem function, causing prolonged apnea (breathing stoppage).
Mechanism: Vaccines stimulate the immune system, leading to increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6, TNF-?). In some infants, especially preterm or immunocompromised ones, this response may become excessive.
Impact on breathing: The medulla oblongata (brainstem) regulates autonomic functions like breathing. Cytokine surges can impair neuronal activity in this region, disrupting the auto-resuscitation reflex—the body’s ability to restart breathing after apnea.
Evidence: Studies on sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) have linked elevated cytokine levels to brainstem gliosis (abnormal cell changes), suggesting inflammation may contribute to fatal apnea.
2. Aluminum adjuvants cross the blood-brain barrier, damaging neurons that control breathing.
Mechanism: Aluminum salts (common vaccine adjuvants) are used to enhance immune responses. However, research (e.g., Matturri et al.) suggests aluminum nanoparticles can cross the immature blood-brain barrier in infants.
Neuronal damage: Once in the brainstem, aluminum may accumulate in neurons controlling respiration and heart rate, causing oxidative stress and dysfunction. Autopsy studies of SIDS cases have found aluminum in brain tissue, correlating with structural abnormalities.
Vulnerability: Preterm infants have a more permeable blood-brain barrier, increasing aluminum uptake and toxicity risk.
3. Synergistic toxicity from multiple vaccines overwhelms an infant’s underdeveloped immune system.
Immune Overload: The simultaneous administration of multiple vaccines (e.g., hexavalent vaccines) may overwhelm an infant’s underdeveloped immune and detoxification systems.
Clinical Data: The study notes that infants receiving multiple vaccines concurrently had:
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻