16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
This is not the first time Big Pharma and regulators have betrayed women’s health. From the thalidomide scandal to the Dalkon Shield disaster, history is littered with examples of corporate negligence and regulatory capture. Now, with fertility rates crashing across the Western world, the question must be asked: Are we as a species being engineered for depopulation?
Women deserve informed consent—not coercion, not propaganda. The Czech data adds to a growing body of evidence that COVID-19 vaccines may be sabotaging fertility - by destroying women's egg supply - yet governments continue to mandate, incentivize, and pressure women into taking them. If these trends continue, the demographic winter once feared by skeptics may become an inescapable reality—one engineered by the very institutions that swore to protect us.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
As Hatfill assumes his new role, his tenure may test the balance between scientific rigor and ideological persistence in public health. With ASPR's future uncertain – with the agency potentially being folded into the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – his focus on global disease threats could either bridge divides or deepen them.
Watch this February 2023 episode of "The Zelenko Report" on Brighteon. TV, where Dr. Steven Hatfill talks about HCQ with Ann Vandersteel.
https://www.brighteon.com/f7698d31-5cd6-4969-ba35-01b0452449ea
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA approves first cell-based gene therapy for rare, devastating skin disorder – but it comes with a huge price tag
On April 29, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Zevaskyn,the first cell-based gene therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa –a rare and agonizing genetic disorder that causes skin to blister and tear at the slightest touch.
Developed by Cleveland-based Abeona Therapeutics, this one-time treatment offers hope for patients who have endured lifelong pain, chronic wounds and systemic complications. However,Zevaskyn comes with a huge price tag – $3.1 million per patient. The treatment's price has raised questions about accessibility, long-term efficacy and whether this marks true progress or just another high-priced biotech gamble.
RDEB is caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene,which disrupts the body's ability to produce type VII collagen – a critical protein that anchors the skin's layers together. Without it, even minor friction causes severe blisters and open wounds that never fully heal.
Patients often suffer from infections, malnutrition (due to esophageal scarring),vision loss and a dramatically increased risk of aggressive skin cancers.The condition affects roughly 3.3 per million people,making it exceptionally rare. But for those afflicted, it is a relentless, life-altering burden.
Until now, treatment has been limited to daily wound care,protective bandaging and two topical therapies approved in 2023: Vyjuvek and Filsuvez. While these options help manage symptoms, they do not address the root cause. Zevaskyn, however, takes a radically different approach–genetically repairing a patient's own skin cells to restore collagen production.
Chemically known as prademagene zamikeracel, Zevaskyn involves extracting a patient's skin cells and genetically modifying them in a lab to produce functional collagen. These cells are then transplanted back as sheets of healthy tissue. These sheets – up to 12 per treatment –are surgically applied to wounds,where they integrate and promote healing.
Clinical trials showed remarkable results. Eighty-one percent of treated wounds achieved at least 50 percent healing within six months, compared to just 16 percent in untreated wounds. Patients also reported significant pain reduction.
Zevaskyn's $3.1 million price tag raises ethical and economic concerns
Unlike Vyjuvek,a topical gel which requires weekly applications, Zevaskyn is designed as a one-time intervention. This has become a major selling point for families exhausted by constant medical upkeep. Moreover, Vyjuvek is designed for smaller wounds, meaning the two therapies could complement each other.
Despite its promise,Zevaskyn's $3.1 million price tag raises ethical and economic concerns. Abeona justified the cost by citing the therapy's complexity, the rarity of RDEB and the potential for long-term savings by reducing hospitalizations and chronic care needs. But critics argued that such exorbitant pricing strains insurers, patients and healthcare systems already buckling under the weight of specialty drugs.
Jefferies analyst Maury Raycroft projects peak sales of $427 million by 2034–a figure that suggests Abeona expects only a fraction of eligible patients will receive treatment. With just 10 to 14 patients expected to be treated this year, the therapy's real-world impact remains uncertain.
The FDA's approval of Zevaskyn is undeniably a milestone,one that could pave the way for similar gene therapies targeting other genetic disorders. Yet, challenges remain. For now,patients and families have reason to hope.
As Zevaskyn clinical trials lead investigator Dr. Jean Tang noted,some treated wounds have remained healed for years. But true progress will be measured not just in scientific achievement,but in whether this therapy reaches those who need it most – without bankrupting them in the process.
Watch this video about incorporating organic essential oils into one's skin care routine.
https://www.brighteon.com/476855c5-4dbe-4bfd-81c4-7dc8600b631b
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Spike protein found in stroke victims’ brains up to 17 months after injection, study reveals
A shocking new peer-reviewed study has exposed the lingering dangers of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, revealing that spike protein—the toxic byproduct of Pfizer and Moderna’s experimental shots—was found in the brains of stroke victims up to 17 months after vaccination. Published in the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, the research examined 19 hemorrhagic stroke cases from 2023 and 2024, discovering that 43.8% of victims still had vaccine-derived spike protein lodged in their cerebral arteries—all of them women.
This damning evidence shatters the CDC’s fraudulent claims that mRNA vaccines remain localized and quickly degrade. Instead, the study proves that spike protein persists in the body far longer than admitted, wreaking havoc on blood vessels and triggering catastrophic health failures.
Key points:
• Spike protein from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines detected in stroke victims up to 17 months post-vaccination.
• All affected patients were women, with spike protein found in cerebral arteries.
• Study confirms vaccine-derived spike protein, not natural infection, was present.
• Researchers warn of "significant concerns" over long-term vaccine safety.
• Lipid nanoparticles may contribute to persistent spike protein circulation, increasing stroke risk.
• Trump Administration still silent on disastrous COVID-19 vaccine program
The spike protein’s deadly persistence
The study, conducted by 10 Japanese researchers, found that in three patients, spike protein remained detectable 11, 12, and 17 months after vaccination—long after Big Pharma and government health agencies assured the public it would be gone.
Dr. Christof Plothe, a steering committee member of the World Council for Health, warned that these findings align with mounting reports of sex-specific vaccine injuries, including menstrual disruptions and myocarditis.
Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense, called the persistence of spike protein "an exceptionally long-lasting vaccination effect"—one that could mean "the assault on the body may exist in perpetuity."
A bioweapon hiding in plain sight
The study’s authors emphasized that lipid nanoparticles—the delivery system for mRNA—may be responsible for spreading spike protein throughout the body, including the brain. This contradicts the CDC’s propaganda that mRNA vaccines remain in the arm and produce only a "harmless" spike protein fragment.
Instead, the research confirms what independent scientists have warned for years: mRNA vaccines are a Trojan horse, smuggling toxic spike protein into vital organs, where it triggers chronic inflammation, clotting disorders, and autoimmune destruction.
Dr. Plothe stated: "While the study does not definitively prove causation, the detection of spike protein in brain arteries—combined with signs of immune cell infiltration—suggest a plausible mechanism for blood vessel damage and hemorrhagic strokes."
The great vaccine cover-up continues
Despite hundreds of studies linking mRNA vaccines to strokes, heart attacks, and sudden deaths, the Trump administration remains silent, refusing to acknowledge the catastrophic failure of its Operation Warp Speed.
The study’s authors called for "global replication studies" to confirm these findings, but the truth is already undeniable: mRNA vaccines were never properly tested, and their long-term effects were deliberately ignored in the rush to push them onto the public.
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher cited a Nature Biotechnology study showing that mRNA vaccines spread spike protein to the liver, spleen, lungs, heart, and brain in mice—a phenomenon now confirmed in humans. Another study in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science found that COVID-19 vaccines increase stroke risk by 112,000% compared to flu shots.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Trump’s surgeon general pick – Casey Means – dodges vaccine debate as health freedom movement demands answers
In a political landscape where health freedom activists have fought for decades to expose Big Pharma corruption, the sudden rise of Casey and Calley Means has raised alarm. Casey Means, a former surgeon turned metabolic health entrepreneur, is now being considered for surgeon general under Trump — yet she refuses to address the elephant in the room: the catastrophic health damage caused by vaccines, particularly COVID-19 mRNA injections.
While the siblings preach about "metabolic dysfunction" and food toxins, critics argue their message is a deliberate diversion from the real crisis: vaccine-induced injuries, autoimmune disorders and sudden deaths plaguing millions since 2020.
Key points raised:
• Casey Means, Trump’s potential surgeon general, avoids discussing vaccine injuries despite rising public concern.
• Means and her brother, Calley, rose to prominence overnight, raising suspicions of deep state orchestration.
• Their focus on "metabolic health" distracts from urgent vaccine safety concerns, including COVID-19 jab injuries.
• RFK Jr. falsely elevated their credentials, calling Calley the "leading advocate" for food safety — despite no prior activism.
• Medical freedom advocates warn: The Means siblings may be co-opting the movement to suppress vaccine truth.
The suspicious rise of the Means siblings
Casey and Calley Means emerged from obscurity in 2024, catapulted into the national spotlight after an appearance on Tucker Carlson’s podcast, which became the "Most Shared Podcast Episode" of the year. Shortly after, STAT News reported they were "buzzing in the same orbit as Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and even former President Donald Trump."
By November 2024, The Wall Street Journal revealed that Casey was being vetted for surgeon general, while Calley was positioned as a key advisor in Trump’s health agenda. But how did two unknowns with zero history in medical freedom activism suddenly become the faces of the movement?
In August 2024, RFK Jr. stunned supporters by suspending his presidential campaign and endorsing Trump. During his announcement, he lavished praise on the Means siblings, calling Calley "the leading advocate for food safety, soil regeneration, and ending chronic disease" — a claim that directly contradicts Calley’s actual resume.
Calley Means was a corporate consultant, lobbyist and investor — not a health freedom warrior. His LinkedIn shows no activism against lockdowns, mandates or vaccine injuries. Meanwhile, Casey Means spent COVID-19 pushing glucose monitoring subscriptions while ignoring the mRNA jab disaster.
A calculated distraction from vaccine injuries?
The Means siblings’ sudden focus on "metabolic health" aligns suspiciously with efforts to downplay vaccine injuries. While they blame processed foods and environmental toxins for chronic disease, they avoid mentioning the sharp rise in myocarditis, turbo cancers, and neurological disorders post-COVID shots.
In a December 2024 podcast, Calley dismissed vaccine concerns, saying:
"Over 80% of medical costs and deaths in the U.S. are tied to preventable metabolic conditions — not parents deciding to delay the Hep B vaccine."
This gaslighting tactic infuriates medical freedom advocates who spent years fighting for vaccine transparency.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
SLOW DEATH JABS: Pfizer Vaccine Linked to Higher All-Cause Mortality Rate than Moderna Shot
Every so-called “conspiracy theorist” and “anti-vaxxer” called out the Covid mRNA “clot shots” right out of the gate, warning everybody NOT to get jabbed with the Bill Gates depopulation stab that Big Pharma, Big Government, Big Media, and the New World Order were pushing so adamantly, like it was the end of the world if we didn’t all get injected. Turns out the Covid stabs ARE depopulation weapons. They are weapons of genocide. They were designed to form spike protein clots throughout the vascular system, invade vital organs, and cause the immune system to attack those foreign particles, driving nearly every disease and disorder to the brink, also known as "all-cause mortality." Get it?
You were warned. Repeatedly.
Now the real science is coming out, that these gene-mutating Trojan Horse jabs catapult just about every disease and disorder known to mankind, including turbo cancer, infertility, heart attacks, strokes, chronic inflammation, autism, central nervous system disorders, vital organ failure, and of course, long-vax syndrome. That goes for the Pfizer jabs, the Moderna stabs, AstraZeneca injections, and even the Johnson & Johnson “one shot” dirty vaccines, if you remember those.
Pfizer “Clot Shot” recipients show shockingly higher mortality rates across the board
A new study has found that individuals who received two doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine faced a higher risk of death from cardiac arrest, COVID-19, and other causes within a year compared to those who took Moderna’s shot. Published on April 29 in the preprint server medRxiv, the research—conducted by MIT and Florida Department of Health scientists—analyzed data from over 1.4 million Floridians. The findings have reignited debates over mRNA vaccine safety, with experts calling for greater scrutiny of nonspecific health effects tied to immunization.
The study compared 735,050 adults who received two Pfizer doses with an equal number who took Moderna’s vaccine, matched by demographics and vaccination timing. Retsef Levi, Ph.D., the study’s lead author, told The Defender, “The Pfizer vaccinees had significantly higher all-cause, cardiovascular, COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 mortality over 12 months post dose two.”
Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, a co-author, criticized the lack of rigorous safety reviews, stating on X, “It has become painfully obvious that as a result of Big Pharma-driven vaccine ideology, these products do not receive the safety scrutiny they should.”
Daniel O’Connor of Trial Site News argued the data should prompt regulatory action: “If Pfizer’s vaccine were a drug on trial, this data would demand a pause—yet it continues under full regulatory protection.” The mortality risk was most pronounced in adults over 60, though the study did not evaluate outcomes for unvaccinated individuals.
The research highlights “nonspecific effects”—unintended health impacts beyond a vaccine’s primary purpose. Levi noted these are rarely studied in trials or post-market reviews, despite their potential significance. The findings align with prior studies, including a June 2024 Italian analysis showing a 20% higher all-cause death risk among the vaccinated. A 2023 multinational study also cited a “definite causal link” between COVID-19 vaccine rollouts and spikes in excess deaths.
As mRNA vaccines remain central to global health strategies, the study underscores the need for transparent, long-term safety data. With regulators like the FDA already flagging myocarditis risks in 2023, the latest research adds urgency to reevaluating vaccine policies. “The public deserves transparency, not silence,” O’Connor said. For now, the debate over balancing vaccine benefits and risks continues—with lives hanging in the balance.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA names scrutiny advocate Dr. Vinay Prasad to lead vaccine division amid calls for transparency
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has appointed Dr. Vinay Prasad, a vocal critic of its handling of pandemic-era vaccine approvals, as the new director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Prasad, an epidemiologist and biostatistics professor at the University of California, San Francisco, replaces Dr. Peter Marks, whose resignation last month highlighted tensions within federal health agencies over vaccine safety, mandates, and transparency. The move, announced May 6 by FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, positions Prasad — a noted skeptic of rushed regulatory decisions — as a key figure in reshaping the agency’s approach to biologics, including vaccines and gene therapies.
Prasad’s academic and public commentary have often scrutinized what he views as missteps in pandemic response. In a 2024 paper titled “COVID-19 vaccines: history of the pandemic’s great scientific success and flawed policy implementation”, he argued that while vaccine development was a scientific triumph, their rollout saw “misplaced utilization, contradictory messaging, and poor deployment,” particularly for younger, lower-risk populations. His decision to leave his role at Sensible Medicine, a health advocacy site critical of inflammatory drug marketing, underscores a broader push for accountability in regulatory science.
The appointment arrives at a pivotal moment for public health policy, as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—a vocal advocate for medical transparency—oversees efforts to reassess vaccine mandates and health data integrity. Sensible Medicine’s endorsement of Prasad praises his “scientific rigor and independence,” aligning with Kennedy’s agenda to dismantle what critics call “Big Pharma collusion” within federal agencies.
Controversial departure of prior director Peter Marks exposes regulatory fault lines
Prasad’s ascension follows the April resignation of Marks, who clashed with Kennedy over transparency and vaccine safety concerns. In his resignation letter, Marks accused Kennedy of demanding “subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies,” alleging the Secretary prioritized rhetoric over evidence-based policy. HHS spokespersons countered that Marks’ resistance to Kennedy’s reforms made him “unsuitable” to lead CBER, citing internal documents that highlighted his rush to approve Pfizer’s emergency use authorization in 2021.
Prasad’s skepticism of Marks was well-documented. In a March X post, he quipped that the FDA’s pre-Praasad era could “replace Marks with a bobblehead doll” due to its overly permissive approach to vaccine approvals. The feud underscores tensions between traditional regulatory practices and new demands for systemic accountability, particularly as RFK’s Health Department seeks to reform mandates and explore alternatives to widespread booster programs.
Kennedy’s influence is further evident in the deprioritization of school vaccine mandates. Trump-backed legislation preventing federal funding for institutions enforcing vaccine mandates — specifically targeting policies for K-12 schools — aligns with Kennedy’s focus on parental autonomy. This push has galvanized movements like the MaHA Alliance, which advocates for decentralized health freedom and integrative medicine practices.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Singapore’s draconian vaccine mandate: Citizens face jail time for refusing FORCED medical procedures that do HARM
Singapore’s descent into medical tyranny
In a shocking move that tramples on fundamental human rights, Singapore has amended its Infectious Diseases Act (IDA) to force medical procedures on its citizens under threat of imprisonment. The amendments, enacted in 2023 and 2024, grant the Director-General of Health unchecked power to mandate vaccines — even in the absence of an active outbreak — while stripping citizens of legal protections against government overreach.
Under Sections 47, 65, and 67 of the IDA, Singaporeans who refuse government-ordered vaccinations can be fined up to 10,000 (SGD) or jailed for sixmonths for a first "offense."
Repeat offenders face double the penalties, with fines up to 20,000 and a year behind bars. Worse yet, Section 67 absolves government officials of all liability, meaning citizens harmed by forced medical interventions have no legal recourse.
A direct assault on medical freedom and informed consent
The amendments represent a blatant violation of the Nuremberg Code, which established the principle of voluntary, informed consent after the atrocities of Nazi medical experiments. The Singaporean government now wields the power to force medical treatments on its people without accountability, echoing the darkest chapters of medical tyranny.
Dr. Smith, a vocal critic of forced vaccination policies, condemned the law: "Current disparate treatment runs rife across this nation, spreading like wildfire. It demands in exchange for job security and participation in society the injection of medical treatments that lack both FDA approval and legal recourse when damaging side effects occur. This is draconian at best and criminal at worst."
Singapore’s People’s Power Party (PPP) has also raised alarms. PPP politician Derrick Sim, a biotechnology and vaccine manufacturing expert, slammed the law in an April 14 Facebook post: "Section 47, 65, and 67 of the Infectious Disease Act were amended and in effect since 2023. If you choose not to go for vaccination during the next pandemic, you will be deemed to commit an offense. You will be criminalized. The penalty for first-time offense is 6 months imprisonment or up to $10,000 fine, or both. Do you support this ridiculous law?"
Alarming provisions highlighting threats to bodily autonomy, due process, and civil liberties
1. Forced Vaccination Under Threat of Imprisonment and Fines
Mandatory Compliance: The law grants the Director-General of Health unchecked authority to order any person or class of persons to undergo vaccination or medical treatment during an outbreak (or even a suspected outbreak).
No Right to Refusal: While the law claims that healthcare providers must "explain" treatment, this is a hollow formality—force is explicitly permitted if the individual does not comply.
Punitive Measures: Non-compliance is punishable by fines up to 10,000(firstoffense)or10,000(firstoffense)or20,000 (repeat offense) and imprisonment for 6-12 months.
2. Vague and Arbitrary Enforcement
No Clear Definition of "Reckless Spread": The law states that recklessly spreading a notifiable disease (e.g., refusing vaccination) could lead to life imprisonment under Section 317 of the criminal code. However, it does not define what constitutes "reckless" behavior, leaving room for abuse and political persecution.
"Imminent Outbreak" Justifies Coercion: The Director-General can mandate forced medical interventions based on a subjective belief that an outbreak is "imminent," with no requirement for concrete evidence.
3. Lack of Accountability for Authorities
Legal Immunity for Enforcers: Section 67 shields government officials (including police and health officers) from any personal liability, even if they act unlawfully, as long as they claim to be acting in "good faith." This creates a license for abuse with no consequences.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Trump halts U.S. funding for dangerous gain-of-function research in China tied to COVID origins
President Donald Trump took decisive action Monday to protect Americans from another pandemic by signing an executive order banning federal funding for gain-of-function research experiments that enhance viruses' lethality in China and other poorly regulated countries.
The move comes after years of mounting evidence that U.S.-backed research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) may have sparked the COVID-19 pandemic, which has claimed millions of lives and devastated economies worldwide.
“It’s a big deal. It could have been that we wouldn’t have had the problem we had, if we had this done,” Trump remarked in the Oval Office, holding up the signed order. The directive halts taxpayer dollars from flowing to high-risk virus manipulation abroad, where oversight is weak, and warns that unchecked gain-of-function experiments threaten public health, economic stability, and national security.
The Wuhan connection
Gain-of-function research, which modifies viruses to increase their transmissibility or deadliness, has long been controversial. Documents reveal that the U.S. government, under Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), funneled millions to the WIV through the EcoHealth Alliance despite a 2014 U.S. moratorium on such experiments. Emails show NIH officials repeatedly warned EcoHealth about violating the funding pause, yet the research continued.
“This dangerous game of function research, which aims at taking pathogens and making them more virulent, more transmissible on humans, many scientists believe is responsible for the COVID pandemic,” said NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. FBI, CIA, and Energy Department assessments, along with former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield, have all pointed to a lab leak as the most likely origin of COVID-19.
Fauci, who once defended gain-of-function studies as “a risk worth taking” in 2011, has dismissed lab-leak theories as “conspiracy theories.” Yet internal records confirm NIAID and USAID directed over $1.4 million to EcoHealth for bat coronavirus research at WIV between 2014 and 2021. A rejected 2018 proposal, Project DEFUSE, sought to engineer high-risk coronaviruses—a plan some experts call a “smoking gun” for COVID’s lab origin.
Peter Daszak, EcoHealth’s president, admitted under congressional questioning that China’s biosafety standards were lax compared to the U.S. and that unpublished virus data may still be hidden in Wuhan.
A history of warnings ignored
The executive order follows decades of ignored red flags. In 2004, Science reported lab accidents prompting calls for stricter containment protocols. The 1977 Russian flu, likely a lab escape, and the 2009 H1N1 vaccine-linked narcolepsy cases underscore the dangers of poorly regulated virology. Trump’s order stops gain-of-function funding until stricter oversight is implemented.
“We can’t point to a single good thing that’s come from [gain-of-function research],” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., citing COVID’s catastrophic toll. “I commend President Trump for his courage and his vision in ending U.S. bioweapons research.”
Trump’s order marks a critical step toward accountability. By cutting off funding for reckless experiments in adversarial nations, the U.S. can mitigate the risk of another man-made pandemic. As Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) declared, “This is a great win for the American people and common sense.” The world cannot afford another Wuhan, and this ban ensures U.S. dollars won’t fund the next global disaster.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Florida study sparks new controversy over mRNA vaccine safety, links Pfizer vaccine to higher mortality rates than Moderna
In a study announced April 29, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo co-authored research revealing that adults in Florida who received Pfizer's mRNA vaccine were 38% more likely to die within 12 months than those who received Moderna's vaccine. The analysis, which compared nearly 1.5 million vaccine recipients and found higher rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular deaths and even deaths directly linked to COVID-19 among Pfizer users, adds to a growing but underreported debate about the unintended consequences of mRNA injections. The findings, shared as a preprint (not yet peer-reviewed), have reignited concerns about mRNA vaccine safety and efficacy, as proponents and critics clash over the implications for public health policies.
The study's alarming findings and methodology
The study, led by Ladapo alongside researchers from the Florida Department of Health and MIT, analyzed 9.2 million vaccination records of non-institutionalized Floridians who received two doses of either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine between late 2020 and mid-2021. The cohort was narrowed to 1.47 million pairs of individuals matched by age, sex, census tract and other demographic factors. Over the next year, Pfizer recipients experienced 847 deaths per 100,000 people, while Moderna recipients saw 618 deaths per 100,000—an increase driven largely by cardiovascular deaths (248.7 vs. 162.4 per 100,000) and non-COVID fatalities (791.6 vs. 588.4).
“Pfizer recipients had significantly higher mortality across nearly every category,” Ladapo told social media followers, emphasizing that this aligns with prior VA studies connecting the vaccine to heart issues. Critics, however, noted the study’s limitations, such as excluding co-morbidities and failing to directly compare vaccinated and unvaccinated groups—a point raised by University of Pennsylvania professor Jeffrey Morris. Levi, a co-author, defended the methodology, stating that comparing vaccines “controls for unobserved confounding factors” better than contrasting vaccinated/non-vaccinated populations.
The shifting narrative on vaccine safety
The findings reverberate against a backdrop of conflicting data released over the past three years. In 2023, a reanalysis of clinical trial data concluded that mRNA vaccines did not affect all-cause mortality but noted vaccinated individuals had higher rates of cardiac deaths, though offset by reduced risk of dying from severe COVID-19. Johnson & Johnson’s viral vector vaccine outperformed both in that assessment. Earlier studies using VA data also found Pfizer recipients faced higher risks of hospitalization and cardiac events, but the Florida analysis, with its larger sample and matched cohort, aims to strengthen claims of a causal link.
This context highlights a broader tension in public health. Initial vaccine efficacy claims of “over 90%” targeted only prevention mechanisms for severe illness, whereas non-specific effects—such as whether the vaccines could inadvertently harm other bodily systems — were largely ignored. Ladapo, a vocal critic of the mRNA platform’s long-term impact, has previously argued that these vaccines act more like gene therapies than traditional vaccines, which typically produce far greater protective immunity (around 99%) sustained for decades.
Implications for health freedom advocacy and policy
The study has galvanized health freedom advocates, who argue that the public was misled about mRNA vaccines’ risks. “The messaging early on painted these shots as near-miraculous, but the reality is murkier,” said one advocate. Ladapo’s social media post, stating the vaccine system is “rotten” and urging scrutiny of non-specific effects, reflects this sentiment. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Moderna were unresponsive to media requests, leaving unanswered questions about whether manufacturers have reviewed mortality data.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Real-time vaccine injury tracking system aims to address “regulatory malpractice” in U.S. surveillance
U.S. health officials announced a major overhaul of the nation’s vaccine safety monitoring system, replacing the widely criticized Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) with a real-time data system using electronic health records (EHRs). The move, spearheaded by Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, seeks to address longstanding concerns about VAERS’s ineffectiveness, which an HHS spokesperson described as “a template of regulatory malpractice” capturing fewer than 1% of actual vaccine-related injuries.
The new system, leveraging Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) — networks that share EHR data among medical providers — will enable the FDA and CDC to monitor adverse events as they occur, replacing VAERS’s outdated reliance on self-reported data. Kennedy, a longtime critic of VAERS, emphasized the need for transparency in his Feb. 14 remarks on Fox News: “We need to know the risk profile of these products,” he stated. With over 500 million vaccine doses administered annually in the U.S., the initiative addresses a demand for accountability as public distrust in vaccine safety grows amid rising rates of chronic conditions such as autism and autoimmune disorders.
From 1% to real-time: closing the data gap
The push for reform stems from a decades-long backlog in vaccine safety reporting. Harvard Medical School researchers revealed in 2006 that VAERS underreported injuries by a factor of 100, a gap Kennedy highlighted as “outrageous” at a March “Make America Healthy Again” event in Indiana. “We’re going to find out what contribution vaccines and everything else — mold, electromagnetic fields, food — began in the late 1980s — whichever are the culprits,” he said, calling for a data-driven approach to distinguish between vaccine side effects and environmental risks.
The FDA’s plan now uses EHRs to capture “the full clinical landscape” of patients’ health pre-, during and post-vaccination, according to Trial Site News founder Daniel O’Connor. Unlike VAERS, which relies on delayed, incomplete, or unverified reports, EHRs allow algorithms to flag patterns — such as sudden rises in myocarditis or autoimmune flares — in near real time. “VAERS catches the sparks, but not the fire,” O’Connor said. The system will also enable comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts to isolate risks, a capability VAERS lacks without external data.
Kennedy’s sub-agency within the CDC, announced in March, will focus on expanding this surveillance to include genetic factors influencing adverse reactions, as noted by Children’s Health Defense scientist Karl Jablonowski. “Interfacing HIE systems could reveal associations between DNA markers and outcomes,” he explained, potentially paving the way for personalized vaccination strategies.
Modernizing trust in public health
Critics of VAERS have long accused the system of perpetuating a “false illusion of vigilance,” as Jablonowski described it. Even proponents of traditional vaccine safety, such as FDA Commissioner Makary, concede the need for drastic modernization. On SiriusXM, Makary highlighted EHRs’ power to analyze 100,000 patient records concurrently, allowing regulators to quantify events like hospital readmissions within days of a shot. “Real science demands transparency and accountability,” an HHS spokesperson added, framing the shift as a return to empirical rigor.
But the overhaul faces hurdles. Transparency advocates stress that the new system must remain open to public scrutiny, not another “closed system” run by contractors or opaque officials. “Without accountability, we risk insanity — same failures, same results,” warned VAERS expert Albert Benavides. Privacy concerns also persist, with immunologist Jessica Rose noting that anonymized data “could…become accessible by anyone.” HHS has not yet finalized protocols to address these issues.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
DTaP vaccine failure exposed: Vaccinated children 15x more likely to spread whooping cough, study finds
The DTaP vaccine — touted as essential for preventing diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough) — actually puts children at greater risk to the targeted diseases, and makes them more likely to contract and carry pertussis (whooping cough). The latest research confirms what truth-tellers have warned for years: the vaccine is a catastrophic failure, leaving vaccinated children up to 15 times more likely to contract whooping cough within five years compared to their unvaccinated peers.
Even more alarming, vaccinated individuals are now confirmed to be silent carriers of pertussis, spreading the bacteria through their nasal passages while evading symptoms — directly contradicting the media’s relentless fearmongering about the "dangerous unvaccinated."
• Peer-reviewed studies reveal DTaP vaccine increases whooping cough risk in children by 15x
• Vaccinated individuals more likely to carry and spread pertussis, contradicting mainstream narratives
• Death risk from DTaP vaccine (1 in 76,000) far exceeds whooping cough fatality rate (1 in 2 million)
• Medical establishment continues to blame unvaccinated despite overwhelming evidence of vaccine failure
The great vaccine deception unravels
For decades, public health officials and pharmaceutical profiteers have peddled the lie that mass vaccination is the only way to prevent outbreaks. Yet the data tells a different story. As Dr. Paul Thomas, a courageous physician unafraid to challenge the medical orthodoxy, explains:
"The risk of death from whooping cough is less than one in 2 million. The risk of death from the vaccine is greater than one in 76,000. The vaccine is killing far more kids."
Let that sink in. The DTaP vaccine isn’t just ineffective — it’s deadlier than the disease it claims to prevent. And yet, the medical-industrial complex continues to push it on unsuspecting parents, while censoring doctors who dare to expose the truth.
Who’s really spreading whooping cough?
The mainstream narrative crumbles under scrutiny. Far from being a threat to public health, the unvaccinated are being scapegoated to cover up vaccine failure. As the study confirms:
"It's the vaccinated who are probably the greatest risk [of spreading whooping cough] because they're more likely to harbor pertussis in their nasal pharynx."
This isn’t a minor oversight—it’s a systemic betrayal. With vaccination rates hovering around 94-95%, outbreaks are still occurring. Why? Because the vaccine does not prevent transmission. Instead, it creates a generation of asymptomatic carriers, silently infecting the vulnerable while Big Pharma pockets billions.
A disturbing resurgence of whooping cough (pertussis) is sweeping through nations that rely on acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, with mounting evidence pointing to the shots' rapidly waning effectiveness and flawed immune priming. Unlike the older whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines, which trigger robust Th1/Th17 immune responses, the newer aP vaccines skew immunity toward weaker Th1/Th2 pathways—leaving children vulnerable within just 2–3 years after booster doses.
While health authorities scramble to blame "better diagnosis" or "more virulent strains," the real culprit appears to be the vaccine itself. Research confirms that aP vaccines fail to provide lasting protection, with effectiveness plummeting post-boosters. Even more alarming, baboon studies—though not yet confirmed in humans—suggest aP vaccines may not even prevent Bordetella pertussis from colonizing the nasopharynx, unlike natural infection or the older wP formula.
Despite offering short-term defense in early childhood, the aP vaccine’s artificial immunity fades fast, leaving populations at risk. With vaccine-induced protection collapsing after mere years, the medical establishment’s reliance on these inferior shots may be fueling — not preventing — the very outbreaks they claim to control.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
The polio vaccine deception: How a tainted medical experiment unleashed cancer, autoimmune disease, and the very epidemic it claimed to stop
In 1959, Dr. Bernice Eddy, a dedicated researcher at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), made a chilling discovery: the polio vaccines being injected into millions of children were contaminated with SV-40, a monkey virus linked to cancer. When she attempted to warn the public, her findings were suppressed, her lab confiscated, and her career derailed. By the time the truth emerged, it was too late—98 million Americans had already been exposed to the carcinogenic virus. Decades later, SV-40 has been detected in brain tumors, bone cancers, and leukemias, leaving a deadly legacy in its wake.
This was no accident. Government officials, pharmaceutical companies, and public health agencies knew the risks—yet they prioritized profit and public perception over safety. Worse, the polio vaccine itself triggered outbreaks, with states like Massachusetts seeing a 642% spike in cases post-inoculation. By the 1980s, 100% of U.S. polio cases were caused by the vaccine. And in a disturbing twist, the monkey kidneys used in vaccine production may have introduced SIV, the precursor to HIV, raising alarming questions about the origins of AIDS.
The polio vaccine scandal is one of the greatest medical betrayals in history—a story of corporate greed, government cover-ups, and lives destroyed.
Key points:
• Cancer-linked SV-40 virus contaminated polio vaccines, infecting millions—now detected in brain tumors, bone cancers, and leukemia.
• Government cover-up: Scientists who exposed the contamination were silenced, demoted, or dismissed.
• Polio cases surged post-vaccine: States like Massachusetts saw a 642% spike after mass inoculations.
• Vaccine-induced polio: By the 1980s, 100% of U.S. polio cases were caused by the vaccine itself.
• HIV connection: Monkey kidneys used in vaccines carried SIV, a precursor to HIV, raising questions about the origins of AIDS.
The deadly legacy of SV-40
From 1955 to 1963, 98 million Americans were injected with SV-40-laced vaccines. Decades later, the virus has been found in 58% of mesothelioma cases, 38% of bone cancers, and a significant percentage of brain tumors and leukemias. Dr. Michele Carbone, a leading pathologist, confirmed SV-40’s role in disabling tumor-suppressing proteins, effectively turbocharging cancer growth.
"It was a frightening discovery... We had no idea what this virus would do," admitted Dr. Ben Sweet, one of the researchers who uncovered SV-40 in vaccines.
From paralysis to profit
The polio vaccine’s rollout was a masterclass in corporate fraud and government collusion. Despite paralysis outbreaks directly tied to vaccinations—like the 266% spike in Vermont and 642% surge in Massachusetts—health officials doubled down.
Dr. Jonas Salk, the vaccine’s creator, privately admitted, "When you inoculate children with a polio vaccine, you don’t sleep well for two or three weeks." Yet, the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (funded by Big Pharma) strong-armed the CDC into declaring the vaccine "safe."
By the 1970s, Dr. Salk himself testified that the oral polio vaccine had become the sole cause of polio in America. CDC data later confirmed: 87% of polio cases in the 1970s-80s, and 100% by 1989, were vaccine-induced.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Despite Baric’s later claims that engineering transmissible viruses was "too edgy," his involvement in DEFUSE and subsequent vaccine research suggests he may have been aware of the risks. The evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 being an engineered virus that escaped from a U.S.-China collaborative research project, with the WIV serving as the site of accidental release.
This scenario explains why Chinese authorities quickly locked down Wuhan—possibly realizing the virus was lab-made—and why Shi Zhengli, a prominent WIV virologist, rushed to publish data on a natural bat virus (RaTG13) to distance her lab from the outbreak.
While direct proof is lacking, the convergence of DEFUSE, PREEMPT, and CREID research, along with lab anomalies and key resignations, strongly suggests a lab origin for COVID-19—one that U.S. and Chinese officials have sought to obscure.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Shifting demographics further complicate bonds
Rural and urban dynamics also influence loneliness. The Gallup-Meta study notes that younger rural populations report slightly less loneliness than their urban counterparts, suggesting that accessibility of communal spaces matters. However, mobility limitations in cities, such as cost-of-living pressures, may reduce opportunities for casual interactions.
"When you can't afford to live near family or friends, you're essentially stranded," said Mira Torres, a social worker in Los Angeles, echoing concerns about affordability deepening alienation.
Tech giants face scrutiny. Meta, the study's co-sponsor, has faced criticism for designing addictive platforms that exacerbate isolation.
"They profit from time spent scrolling, not conversations," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), echoing Senate hearings on social media's impacts. Yet Meta's research director, Javier Oliva, claims their work "aims to understand, not address," noting the company funds mental wellness programs. Critics argue that monetization strategies must evolve alongside this awareness.
Mental health professionals are expanding treatments. Loneliness clinics, as reported by The Lancet, now integrate group therapy and social skill training.
"We're moving beyond individual therapy to build shared spaces," said Dr. Sara Elson, a loneliness clinic director in London. Meanwhile, startup Singularity6 uses VR avatars for neurodivergent individuals to practice real-world interactions – a hybrid approach acknowledging some benefits of technology.
The Gallup-Meta study amplifies a clarion call to reimagine modern society. With loneliness linked to early mortality risks comparable to smoking, experts argue it's a public health emergency requiring policy action and cultural shifts. As former Surgeon General Murthy warned, "Technology can't be our default. To rebuild, we must rethink vulnerability – not as a weakness but as a gateway to belonging."
Watch the video below that talks about combating loneliness.
https://www.brighteon.com/1227efff-c24e-4e40-8cd3-fb93c5d5c629
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Silent catastrophe: COVID-19 vaccines linked to plummeting fertility rates, Czech data reveals
As governments and health authorities continue to push COVID-19 vaccinations as "safe and effective," alarming new evidence suggests a devastating toll on women’s reproductive health. A groundbreaking study from the Czech Republic reveals that vaccinated women experienced significantly lower successful conception rates compared to their unvaccinated counterparts—raising urgent questions about the long-term consequences of these experimental injections. Despite mainstream narratives dismissing fertility concerns, the data paints a grim picture: if these trends hold, the world may be facing a silent demographic collapse, engineered by the very institutions entrusted with public health.
The fertility free fall: What the data shows
The Czech Republic study, analyzing 1.3 million women aged 18–39 from 2021–2023, reveals a concerning correlation between COVID-19 vaccination and declining fertility. Vaccinated women exhibited significantly lower birth rates compared to unvaccinated women, with the disparity widening as vaccination rates increased. By June 2021, when 39% of women were vaccinated, they accounted for only 7% of live births—a statistically implausible discrepancy. The total fertility rate plummeted from 1.83 in 2021 to 1.45 in 2023, a decline that aligns precisely with the vaccine rollout. While some attribute this to economic or pandemic-related stress, the data suggest a direct link to vaccination.
The study acknowledges potential biases, such as self-selection (women avoiding vaccination to conceive), but notes that the overall fertility decline contradicts this explanation. Additionally, prior research has documented menstrual irregularities and ovarian impacts from mRNA vaccines, further supporting biological plausibility. The findings echo trends in Germany, Sweden, and the U.S., where post-vaccination fertility drops and increased miscarriages were reported.
Though not definitive proof of causation, the study underscores the need for urgent, large-scale investigations into COVID-19 vaccines' reproductive effects. The data challenge official assurances of vaccine safety during pregnancy and highlight potential long-term demographic consequences.
A pattern of deception
Public health agencies have long insisted that COVID-19 vaccines pose no risk to fertility, despite zero long-term safety studies before mass deployment. Yet, emerging research tells a different story:
• A 2023 study found that mRNA vaccines destroy primordial follicles in rats, leading to irreversible ovarian damage—raising the specter of early menopause and sterility in women.
• Bio-distribution studies confirm that lipid nanoparticles, the delivery system for mRNA shots, accumulate in the ovaries, potentially triggering inflammation and cell death.
• The CDC and WHO continue to ignore mounting evidence, doubling down on recommendations for pregnant women—despite rising stillbirths and miscarriage reports worldwide.
The great cover-up
The Czech study’s authors cautiously note that their findings are "hypothesis-generating"—but the implications are dire. If mRNA vaccines are indeed depleting ovarian reserves, the consequences could be generational. Yet, instead of pausing vaccinations for further investigation, health authorities dismiss concerns as "misinformation."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Virologist who endorsed HCQ for COVID-19 appointed to top pandemic post at HHS
A scientist who endorsed hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a treatment for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) during the early days of the pandemic has been appointed to a key position at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Steven J. Hatfill, who previously served as a White House COVID-19 advisor during President Donald Trump's first term, was recruited again for the real estate mogul's second term – albeit in a new role this time. According to the Washington Post (WaPo), Hatfill began his second week as a special adviser in the director's office of the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) on Monday, May 5.
The ASPR is an agency tasked with pandemic readiness and biodefense, two fields Hatfill is no stranger to. Nevertheless, his appointment underscores lingering divisions over COVID-19 treatments that go against conventional medical advice.
Hatfill, a former Army biodefense researcher, gained attention in 2020 for championing HCQ as an early intervention for COVID-19 despite pushback from federal health agencies and mainstream medical experts. He defended his stance in an interview with WaPo Saturday, May 3.
"They gave the drug to the president. It is a safe drug," said Hatfill, referencing Trump's use of HCQ when he contracted COVID-19. The virologist also cited "5,000 controlled, randomized [and] peer-reviewed studies" that attested to HCQ's safety and efficacy when administered promptly.
Hatfill also reiterated his commitment to "get us ready for the next pandemic." He expressed plans to work with other scientists at the ASPR to build "complete awareness of the scientific literature, not just for influenza, bird flu or COVID-19 – but other global diseases that could represent a threat to the United States."
Medical experts attest to HCQ's effectiveness
The Food and Drug Administration initially granted HCQ emergency use authorization in March 2020. But the agency revoked it three months later, citing cardiac risks and a lack of proven benefit. Critics, including Hatfill, argue that flawed studies – such as those administering the drug too late or at toxic doses – skewed the evidence.
Other medical experts also attested to HCQ's effectiveness. Texas physician Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, who treated thousands of COVID-19 patients, said HCQ caused no serious side effects in her practice. Biological warfare expert Dr. Meryl Nass meanwhile noted the paradox of HCQ being deemed safe for lupus and malaria, but suddenly "dangerous" for COVID-19.
Dr. Joseph Varon, president and chief medical officer of the Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), praised HHS for "recognizing the value of voices like Hatfill." According to Varon, Hatfill's appointment is a step toward "rebuilding public trust" in healthcare. Formerly known as the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, the IMA was among the proponents of HCQ t0 address SARS-CoV-2 infection.
But not everyone welcomed the virologist's appointment, including Robert Steinbrook, health research group director for the progressive nonprofit Public Citizen. He argued that HCQ's purported ineffectiveness against COVID-19 is settled science, noting that officials like Hatfill "should evaluate medicines based on evidence, not personal views."
Hatfill's name is also embroiled in controversies outside HCQ. Emails released by a Democrat-led House subcommittee revealed Hatfill's involvement in Trump's crusade to expose election fraud after the 2020 elections. His past also includes a wrongful link to the 2001 anthrax attacks, which cost him his job before a $4.6 million settlement with the Department of Justice.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
With autopsy reports, peer-reviewed studies, and whistleblower testimonies all pointing to the same horrifying reality, how much longer will the medical establishment deny the truth?
As Dr. Plothe declared: "Given the unresolved safety concerns and the availability of alternative solutions, a global moratorium on these vaccines is urgently needed."
The question remains: When will those responsible for this mass medical catastrophe be held accountable?
We are yet to see anyone in the Trump Administration take a stand against this depopulation scheme. This genetic weaponry, and biological weapon system has yet to be addressed properly, and the perpetrators behind the deception of this program are yet to be punished, tried, and convicted of mass manslaughter, medical malpractice, and wrongful death.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A deeper agenda?
Critics suspect the Means siblings are controlled opposition, inserted to steer the health freedom movement away from vaccine truth. Their ties to Big Pharma-linked groups raise red flags:
• Calley is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a globalist think tank.
• Both worked with lobbying firms tied to pharmaceutical interests.
• Their companies (Levels and TruMed) profit from "metabolic health" solutions, not vaccine injury advocacy.
Ann Tomoko Rosen, a health freedom writer, warned: "When people who were silent during COVID show up out of nowhere asking us to 'join the movement,' it feels weird. Why are they being handed the podium while veterans of this fight are sidelined?"
As Trump considers Casey Means for surgeon general, medical freedom advocates demand answers: Why is she avoiding the vaccine debate? If she won’t address COVID-19 jab injuries, how can she be trusted to protect public health?
The Means siblings may preach "root-cause medicine," but if they ignore the root cause of the post-2020 health collapse — vaccines — then their agenda is clear: silence the truth.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Pharma stocks tumble after appointment of Dr. Vinay Prasad to key FDA post
Stocks of pharmaceutical companies nosedived following the appointment of Dr. Vinay Prasad to a key position at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary announced Prasad's appointment as director of the agency's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Tuesday, May 6, in an internal email later quoted by media outlets. Prasad took over the post vacated by his predecessor, Dr. Peter Marks, who stepped down in March following disagreements with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over vaccine policy.
The new CBER head – a hematologist-oncologist and professor at the University of California, San Francisco – has authored over 500 academic papers and two books critical of medical reversals and flawed research. He is also a staunch critic of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, noting that children don't need the injections and they shouldn't be required in schools. Prasad has also denounced the media for stoking "COVID-19 alarmism" and overstating the threat of SARS-CoV-2.
Prasad also criticized the FDA's accelerated approval process under Marks, who was a staunch advocate for rapid vaccine authorization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even Emily Kopp of the Daily Caller couldn't help but point out that "Marks' No. 1 critic just took his job."
Makary's announcement sent shockwaves throughout the stock market, triggered a sharp sell-off in vaccine and biotech stocks. Shares of mRNA vaccine maker Moderna dropped as much as 13 percent on Tuesday, while that of Novavax dropped by 7.2 percent. Sarepta Therapeutics, a company specializing in gene therapies, saw its stocks nosedive by as much as 27 percent.
From Kennedy to Prasad: How Trump's health policy shakeup is crushing Big Pharma stocks
This wasn't the first time pharmaceutical industry stocks plunged following a shakeup in the FDA, as Marks' abrupt resignation on March 28 triggered a similar downturn. Moderna stocks plunged by 12 percent, while Novavax stocks dropped by 10 percent. Shares of BioNTech – Pfizer's partner in developing its COVID-19 injection – dropped by 5.8 percent that day.
Prasad's skepticism aligns with the second Trump administration's push for regulatory reform, including proposed cuts to global health initiatives and a reduction in the federal workforce. The new CBRE head's appointment underscores the growing influence of critics within federal health agencies – a trend that began with Kennedy's controversial nomination and subsequent confirmation to the Department of Health and Human Services.
The market reaction was immediate, with analysts warning of broader implications for the industry. Jared Holz of Mizuho Securities noted Prasad's "anti-industry" stance as a key concern, particularly for companies reliant on expedited approvals.
Historically, the FDA has balanced industry collaboration with public health oversight, but recent leadership changes signal a shift toward skepticism of mainstream vaccine policy. Analysts warn that uncertainty around drug approvals could stifle innovation, particularly in gene and cell therapy.
As the FDA enters a new era under Prasad's leadership, the pharmaceutical industry faces heightened scrutiny – and investors are bracing for further turbulence. The agency's credibility, already strained by allegations of corporate favoritism, may now be tested by a director who has built his career challenging conventional medical wisdom. Whether this shift leads to greater transparency or deeper polarization remains to be seen.
Watch Dr. Pam Popper sharing some common sense commentary from Dr. Vinay Prasad in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/604794d8-e26f-4386-afd2-2a38fbd7d363
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Broader implications for health policy transparency
The Prasad appointment resonates within communities long skeptical of institutional healthcare practices. Advocates like Tracy Kucer, founder of the Autism Health Summit and a vocal supporter of natural immunity, see the shift as a step toward “restoring science to its golden standard.” Kucer’s son Noah, vaccine-injured after an MMR shot, mirrors the experiences of families battling dismissive medical systems. Their stories, shared at conferences emphasized holistic healing, intersect with calls for open-access medical AI platforms that challenge vaccine-autism disinformation silos while prioritizing peer-reviewed data.
Dr. Andrew Wakefield, whose early critiques of vaccine scheduling now see limited mainstream vindication, remains a contentious figure. Yet advocates argue emerging studies and AI-driven research, such as open-source models linking vaccine components to inflammatory conditions, validate long-overlooked concerns. Meanwhile, Sensible Medicine’s analysis of myocarditis risks in young males echoes critiques of blanket rollout strategies.
Prasad’s leadership could catalyze systemic reforms. His papers emphasize adaptive trial protocols to better assess vaccine efficacy in varied populations and real-time safety surveillance. This approach, coupled with Kennedy’s deregulatory agenda, may pave the way for localized health initiatives prioritizing natural immunity and alternative therapies, such as hyperbaric oxygen and toxin-free diets.
A new era of questioning, but trust remains fractured
Dr. Vinay Prasad’s rise to lead CBER symbolizes both cautious optimism and deepening skepticism in post-pandemic health governance. For families like Noah Kucer’s, it represents a chance to mainstream discussions about vaccine safety, environmental toxins, and patient autonomy — ideas long sidelined by institutional inertia. Yet, as Sensible Medicine notes, rebuilding trust demands “transparent data aggregation,” rigorous follow-up on adverse events, and a reckoning with the political forces that shaped pandemic policies.
The question remains: Can the FDA’s new direction balance scientific rigor with accountability, or will it falter under pressures of corporate influence and ideological divides? For now, advocates hope Prasad’s tenure brings both accountability and the evidence-based clarity needed to heal—not just from pathogens, but also from systemic distrust.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Magistrate’s Court Bypasses Due Process: Offenses under this law can be tried in a Magistrate’s Court, which can impose maximum penalties without standard legal safeguards, effectively fast-tracking punishments.
4. Medical Tyranny and Loss of Bodily Autonomy
No Exemptions for Conscience or Religion: The law does not appear to recognize medical, religious, or conscientious objections, treating refusal as a criminal act.
"Other Prophylaxis" Opens Door to Broader Mandates: The vague term "other prophylaxis" could be interpreted to include experimental drugs, forced quarantine, or other invasive measures beyond just vaccines.
A dangerous precedent
Singapore’s law sets a chilling precedent for governments worldwide. If a nation can imprison citizens for refusing medical procedures, what stops other regimes from following suit? The World Health Organization (WHO) is already pushing for a global pandemic treaty that could enforce similar mandates internationally, eroding medical sovereignty worldwide.
History has shown that forced medical interventions never end well. From Nazi Germany’s experiments to Tuskegee’s unethical syphilis trials, governments that override bodily autonomy always claim it’s for the greater good—until the truth of their crimes is exposed.
Will the world stand by as Singapore jails its own citizens for refusing harmful and ineffective vaccines?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Landmark study of 85 million reveals shocking surge in heart attacks, strokes, and sudden death following the notorious COVID-19 jab
COVID-19 jabs destroyed cardiovascular function
The COVID-19 vaccine catastrophe has reached a horrifying new milestone. A peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Preventive Medicine has confirmed what independent researchers, whistleblowers, and grieving families have warned about for years: These experimental injections are maiming and killing people at an unprecedented scale.
Analyzing data from 85 million individuals, researchers found that the so-called "vaccines" are directly linked to skyrocketing rates of cardiovascular destruction, including:
• Stroke risk increased by 240% after the first dose of any COVID vaccine.
• Heart attack risk surged by 286% following the second dose.
• Coronary artery disease (CAD) jumped by 244% post-second dose.
• Arrhythmia risk exploded by 199% after the first dose—but AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1 shot spiked it by 711%.
The worst offenders? Pfizer’s mRNA shot (BNT162b2) and AstraZeneca’s viral vector vaccine (ChAdOx1). The second dose of Pfizer’s injection was tied to a 284% increased risk of heart attack, while AstraZeneca’s first dose showed a 711% surge in arrhythmia cases—a condition that can lead to sudden cardiac death.
The findings are corroborated by other new studies, such as the one titled, "COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals." From this study, the researchers concluded, "This multi-country analysis confirmed pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified."
The cover-up continues: How public health agencies ignored the warnings
Despite these damning findings, the CDC, FDA, and WHO continue to push these deadly shots, even recommending them for children and pregnant women. The study’s authors admit their findings should "help public health policy for future pandemics"—yet no such policy changes have been made.
Epidemiologist Nicholas Hulscher warns that the true death toll is likely far worse than reported. Extrapolating from recent research, he estimates that Pfizer’s vaccine alone may have killed 470,000 Americans—a conservative figure that excludes deaths from Moderna and other brands.
"The deadly COVID-19 mRNA injections, still being administered to millions of American children, are responsible for more American casualties than World War I, World War II, and the Vietnam War combined," Hulscher stated.
A global genocide? The unfolding biological warfare against humanity
This is not just negligence—it’s deliberate biological sabotage. The spike protein, whether injected or shed, disrupts cellular function, triggers blood clots, and causes systemic inflammation. The result? Heart failure in athletes, strokes in young adults, and sudden deaths in otherwise healthy individuals.
COVID-19 injections are biological weapons, attacking our genetic integrity and the harmony of natural protein synthesis of healthy cells. The COVID-19 injections remain on the market, despite critical and damning evidence suggesting they have destroyed the human population, directly and even indirectly through occupational spike protein exposure.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a leading cardiologist, has repeatedly warned that these vaccines should be pulled from the market immediately. "The risk-benefit analysis is clear," he says. "These shots are causing more harm than COVID-19 ever did."
Yet, governments and pharmaceutical giants continue to suppress the truth, censoring doctors, manipulating data, and dismissing vaccine injuries as "coincidences." History will remember this era as one of unprecedented medical tyranny—a time when corporate greed and government collusion overruled science, ethics, and human life.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Critics of Ladapo’s work worry this could fuel vaccine hesitancy, while supporters counter that transparency is critical. The study’s exclusion of the unvaccinated cohort remains a contentious point. As healthcare workers note, mortality comparisons without this baseline risk misinterpret outcomes. MIT’s Levi acknowledged this gap but stressed that inter-vaccine comparisons address some confounding variables, such as age, comorbidities, or lifestyle factors.
A call for vigilance as debate intensifies
The Florida study underscores the urgent need for rigorous long-term monitoring of vaccine safety. While its claims of higher Pfizer-associated mortality remain preliminary until peer-reviewed, the findings cannot be dismissed. The policy implications are profound: it calls into question the very narrative that mRNA vaccines are universally safe and effective across populations.
For now, public health authorities must balance the use of vaccines for reducing severe disease from the virus against emerging evidence of collateral harm. “We owe it to the public to explore these risks further,” said one independent epidemiologist. As debates over health freedom and clinical ethics continue, conversations about vaccine choice and transparency may reshape pandemic preparedness for future health crises. The world watches closely, awaiting further clarity in the pursuit of science that serves, rather than risks, humanity.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Kennedy’s critics, including some public health researchers, argue his reforms conflate proven vaccine benefits with unproven risks. STAT News reported that Kennedy misrepresented a 2006 study’s findings to exaggerate VAERS’s shortcomings, while others see his focus on environmental exposures as a distraction from vaccine efficacy. Yet even skeptics acknowledge the system needed an overhaul: “This is the type of modernization we need,” O’Connor said.
A watershed moment
The decision marks a rare bipartisan acknowledgment of systemic failures in U.S. healthcare infrastructure. As the CDC maps genetic vulnerabilities and the FDA merges adverse event databases for drugs and devices, the stakes are existential. “The key is not controlling the outcome, but letting the data speak,” O’Connor reiterated — a mantra resonating with a public weary of conflicting medical narratives.
For Kennedy, whose environmental activism links to his health initiatives, the reform is both technical and cultural. “Public trust demands we reveal all culprits, even uncomfortable ones,” he told NewsNation in April. Whether the new system identifies hidden risks or confirms vaccine safety, the consensus is clear: Patients deserve answers rooted in data, not dogma.
In an age where health misinformation fuels political divisions, the U.S.’ pivot to transparent, EHR-driven surveillance could redefine public health as a pillar of national security — or risk further eroding the fragile trust in its institutions.
The data speaks — or does it?
As the EHR initiative unfolds, the test lies in execution. Will real-time data finally chart a course between safety and autonomy, or will underreporting or overreach persist? For now, RFK Jr.’s vision — shared even by his skeptics — has galvanized action. “We owe it to the public,” O’Connor said, echoing a sentiment transcending partisan lines. The world now watches whether science, not spin, emerges.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A medical tyranny built on lies
The implications are staggering. Parents are being coerced, shamed, and even punished for refusing a vaccine that not only fails to protect but actively endangers their children. Parents are bullied into getting the vaccine for their children so they can attend school. However, there are exemptions in almost every state, allowing parents to do what's smart for their child: Protect them from vaccine contagion, vaccine damage, and vaccine fraud.
Meanwhile, the media parrots the same tired script of medicos: Blame the unvaccinated.
But the science is undeniable. As Children’s Health Defense’s Polly Tommey warns: "If you take your child for any vaccine, by the way, but we're talking about the DTaP at the moment, your child could die. Now, who knew that?"
The question isn’t whether the vaccine industry will be held accountable — it’s when. Will the new HHS, under Secretary Kennedy, change guidelines for vaccines like DTaP, warning parents that the risks are far worse to take the vaccine? Will the public wake up before more lives are destroyed? Or will the lies continue to spread — just like whooping cough among the vaccinated?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Polio’s resurgence: A self-inflicted epidemic
The polio vaccine was marketed as a miracle cure, but behind the scenes, it was a public health disaster.
• Polio cases surged after vaccination campaigns. Massachusetts saw a 642% increase in 1955, while Vermont experienced a 266% spike—all linked to the vaccine.
• By the 1970s, Dr. Jonas Salk himself admitted that the oral polio vaccine was causing polio. CDC data later confirmed that 100% of U.S. polio cases by 1989 were vaccine-induced.
• Health officials changed diagnostic criteria to hide the truth. Before 1954, polio was diagnosed after 24 hours of paralysis; post-vaccine, the requirement was extended to 60 days, artificially reducing case numbers.
• The oral vaccine’s live virus spread through fecal matter, infecting unvaccinated children and causing outbreaks in communities.
• VAERS reports reveal 13,641 adverse events—including 540 deaths—linked to the polio vaccine in just five years.
• The vaccine didn’t eradicate polio—it redefined it, replacing wild polio with vaccine-derived strains. Today, as global health agencies push new polio boosters, the question remains: Will history repeat itself?
The polio vaccine scandal is a stark reminder of what happens when corporate interests override public safety. The victims—millions of cancer patients, paralyzed children, and families destroyed—deserve justice. But will they ever get it?
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
RFK Jr. Says New Parents Should “Do Your Own Research” Into Vaccines
When it comes to dirty Western Medicine, the number one thing pharma does NOT want anyone doing is their own research to find out what’s really in it all, and that includes prescription drugs, chemotherapy and vaccines. Now, not many folks have a stack of medical books or mass-spec laboratory equipment sitting around the house, but what Robert F. Kennedy is suggesting is to find out exactly what is in the “medicine” and jabs before putting them in your body or your children, babies, or fetus. Look at all the ingredients and side effects.
Do not underestimate the danger of injecting known neurotoxins, poisonous venom peptides, heavy metal toxins, parasites, genetically modified organisms, wild live viruses, combinations of viruses, monosodium glutamate, animal blood, human abortion cells, and the scary list just goes on and on. Ask to read (or look up) the vaccine information insert that comes with each vaccine.
Health Secretary RFK Jr. advises everyone do their own vaccine research amid autism concerns, heart problems and miscarriages from MMR and mRNA jabs
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has urged parents to independently research vaccines while confirming that federal health officials are investigating potential links between vaccinations and autism.
During an April 28 town hall with Dr. Phil, Kennedy responded to a mother’s question by emphasizing parental responsibility in evaluating medical decisions, stating, “You research the baby stroller, you research the foods that they’re getting, and you need to research the medicines that they’re taking as well.”
Kennedy, who previously expressed skepticism about vaccine safety, clarified during his confirmation hearings that he is “pro-safety” rather than anti-vaccine, acknowledging vaccines’ role in saving lives. However, he has raised concerns about the CDC’s recommended schedule, which includes 12 doses in a child’s first four months and dozens more by adulthood.
Recent CDC data shows declining vaccination rates and rising exemptions, with only 13% of children receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Kennedy is considering removing COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood schedule due to reported adverse effects like myocarditis and strokes, stressing the need for a revised risk-benefit analysis.
A key focus of Kennedy’s inquiry is the alleged connection between vaccines—particularly the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine—and autism. He cited parental reports of children developing autism shortly after vaccination, though the CDC maintains that studies “show vaccines are not associated with ASD [autism spectrum disorder].” The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has recognized some cases of vaccine-related brain injuries, but scientific consensus remains divided.
Kennedy also questioned the safety of the combined MMR vaccine, claiming its mumps component was never properly tested for interactions, potentially leading to adverse events. Despite this, he reiterated that the MMR vaccine reduces measles risk amid recent U.S. outbreaks. Experts like Dr. Monica Gandhi defend the vaccine’s safety and efficacy, urging parents to vaccinate.
As autism rates rise (now affecting 1 in 31 children), Kennedy has pledged to investigate causes while balancing public health priorities. His stance reflects broader tensions between vaccine skepticism and scientific consensus, leaving parents navigating conflicting information amid outbreaks of preventable diseases.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
U.S. virologist Ralph Baric engineered COVID-19 to be able to cross blood-brain barrier using furin cleavage technology in Fauci’s lab under “DEFUSE” project
Furin cleavage is the tell-tale sign that COVID-19 was created in a lab on purpose to be able to cross the blood-brain barrier and infect humans in order to create the plandemic we all suffered through for the past 5 years. Furin cleavage is a slit inserted in the coronavirus (viral genome) spike protein that enables it to enter human cells after binding to ACE2 receptors.
Top U.S. virologist Ralph Baric engineered the virus in Fauci’s lab at the University of North Carolina under the guise of the 2018 “DEFUSE” funding proposal, and this is the smoking gun that reveals COVID-19 was in fact created in a lab and released on purpose to create a pandemic that killed hundreds of millions of people, not only with a virus with this capability, but with dirty vaccines that did the same damage.
• Covid-19 was created in a lab using furin cleavage technology that can cross the blood-brain barrier
• Virologist Ralph Baric worked for Fauci and helped create the scamdemic of the century
• Vaccines for Covid also had spike protein furin cleavage technology to infect the brain and ovaries as part of the mass depopulation agenda of the New World Order
Virologist Ralph Baric, a leading figure in coronavirus research, helped the virus cross the blood-brain barrier to make it lethal
The DEFUSE project, a controversial U.S.-led research initiative, has been linked to the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. The project, first revealed through leaked documents obtained by U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), proposed engineering bat coronaviruses to preemptively vaccinate bats in regions where U.S. military personnel operated.
Key aspects of the project included inserting a furin cleavage site into a SARS-like virus, optimizing it to bind to human ACE2 receptors, and ensuring its genome was about 25% different from SARS—features that closely match SARS-CoV-2.
Virologist Ralph Baric, a leading figure in coronavirus research, had patented a similar virus in 2018, just as DEFUSE was being developed. However, DARPA rejected DEFUSE in favor of a competing proposal called PREEMPT, led by Dr. Vincent Munster at Anthony Fauci’s NIH Rocky Mountain Lab.
While DEFUSE involved spraying bat caves with a non-transmissible virus-vaccine, PREEMPT proposed a self-spreading vaccine—engineered to transmit between bats via aerosols, increasing the risk of accidental human exposure. After DEFUSE was rejected, Fauci’s NIAID awarded an $82 million grant (CREID) in 2019, merging Baric’s and Munster’s teams to develop Munster’s transmissible virus-vaccine concept.
Evidence suggests that Munster’s lab modified Baric’s virus to make it transmissible, given that SARS-CoV-2 efficiently infects animals found in Munster’s Montana lab (e.g., American deer, deer mice, and Egyptian fruit bats) but not those in Chinese labs.
The virus may have been sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for testing on Chinese bats by Dr. Danielle Anderson, a Duke-NUS researcher who worked in the WIV’s BSL-4 lab. Anderson had previously been involved in DEFUSE’s bat experiments, making her a likely candidate to test the transmissible virus-vaccine. A lab leak during these experiments could explain SARS-CoV-2’s emergence in Wuhan. Supporting this theory:
• Mobile data suggests a lab shutdown at the WIV in October 2019, possibly due to a lab accident.
• Dr. Linfa Wang, Anderson’s supervisor, abruptly resigned on January 10, 2020—the day SARS-CoV-2’s genome was published—raising suspicions of a cover-up.
• Early COVID-19 cases clustered near where Anderson and colleagues lived in Wuhan.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Global surge in loneliness persists post-pandemic, study reveals
A new global study reveals that loneliness remains stubbornly persistent, disproportionately affecting younger generations.
The Gallup and Meta Platforms collaboration, "The Global State of Social Connections," surveyed over 204,000 participants across 142 countries between June 2022 and February 2023, finding stark disparities in loneliness rates by age. While pandemic-era lockdowns exacerbated isolation, the data suggests lingering struggles, particularly among teens and young adults, even as in-person restrictions ease. The findings underscore a growing health crisis tied to social disconnection – and highlight the paradox of connectivity in an age where virtual presence often overshadows real-world bonds.
The study's most striking revelation lies in the generational divide. Among respondents aged 15 to 18, 25 percent report feeling "very lonely" or "fairly lonely," a rate that climbs to 27 percent in 19- to 29-year-olds. Meanwhile, individuals over 65 experience the lowest loneliness rates at 17 percent.
"This isn't just a pandemic artifact – it's part of a shift toward chronic isolation that predates 2020," said Dr. Janenaire Morley, a sociologist unaffiliated with the study but reviewing its findings. "Younger cohorts navigate social expectations against a backdrop of economic instability and digital overstimulation."
The health toll: Loneliness as a chronic risk
The physical and mental health ramifications of loneliness are well-documented. The World Health Organization recognizes social isolation as a risk factor for chronic conditions like diabetes, heart disease and dementia, while the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) links it to heightened anxiety and depression.
"When people lack meaningful relationships, their whole health declines," said Dr. Liam Chen, a geriatrician at the UCLA Medical Center. "The mental anguish of loneliness primes the body for stress, weakening immunity and accelerating aging."
Social media's role: A virtual smoke screen
The study sidesteps pinpointing causes, but parallel research offers clues. A 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine study found that social media users spending over two hours daily were twice as likely to experience perceived social isolation as those online for less than 30 minutes.
"Platforms like Instagram and TikTok promise 'connection' but offer superficial engagement," noted Dr. Vivek Murthy, former U.S. Surgeon General, in a 2021 interview. "You can't scroll through a feed and know someone."
His warning resonates in the Gallup-Meta data, which shows teens and young adults, the most digitally active, encompassing the highest loneliness brackets.
Historical context: Shifts in social structure
The current crisis echoes long-standing societal shifts. The late 20th century saw shrinking social spheres, with Americans averaging three "confidants" in 2004, down from two dozen in 1985, per Robert Putnam's 2000 book "Bowling Alone."
"Now, screens have replaced community gatherings," said Putnam. "The pandemic accelerated these trends – a generational text now replaces catching up over coffee." Gallup's findings reflect this trajectory, with global lockdowns amplifying the issue.
Experts urge multitiered solutions; Murthy himself emphasizes "in-person interaction as non-negotiable" – a priority amid findings that just 36 percent of respondents feel well-connected to their communities. The former surgeon general also advocates critical media consumption, demanding news outlets frame events without fearmongering or polarizing narratives. On an individual level, the American Psychological Association recommends practical steps: Scheduling face time, joining local groups and setting "phone-free" windows during family time.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻