16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
This isn’t about health. It’s about control. A synthetic, military-backed vaccine platform designed for endless iterations is the ultimate tool for compliance. With the WHO and Gates Foundation already setting "preferred criteria" for universal flu shots, the globalist playbook is clear: Manufacture crises, mandate injections, repeat.
The GAO’s report isn’t a reassurance—it’s a warning. The next pandemic may not be an accident. It may be a scheduled event, just like the last ones.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
CDC ends demands that pregnant women and children get deadly Covid prion-inducing vaccines, but STILL keeps genocide jabs on market for all others
Recalling the recommendation for toxic Covid jabs for children and pregnant women only is like recalling e-coli infected meat only for children but leaving it on the market for everyone else. The CDC can’t bring themselves to admit that the Covid mRNA clot shots deliver much more risk than benefit, including damage to the heart and brain of children, babies, pregnant women, and even healthy athletes and military members. So why not recall all the mRNA jabs? Well, there’s a simple answer for that.
Covid jabs have been an excellent form of depopulation for the planet for the past five years, just as they were designed to be
The U.S. government has abruptly halted its recommendation for routine COVID-19 vaccinations for healthy children and pregnant women, bypassing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) traditional advisory process.
This is based on SCIENCE proving there are NO benefits for children and pregnant women, only health detriment, as evident by the health carnage of those who have taken them. Pregnant women around the globe who get injected with the prion-making “technology” are 33 percent more likely to have a miscarriage, for starters. Kids are at ZERO risk of dying from Covid, so there’s also that.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the shift in a social media post on Tuesday, May 27, marking a significant departure from federal health guidance that had previously urged nearly all Americans to stay updated with COVID-19 shots. The move reflects growing skepticism toward universal vaccine mandates and aligns with broader efforts to limit federal health interventions.
Traditionally, changes to vaccine recommendations undergo review by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which votes before the CDC director issues final guidance. However, Kennedy’s announcement came without ACIP consultation—a move that has drawn criticism from public health experts.
"The recommendation is coming down from the secretary, so the process has just been turned upside down," said Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt University and ACIP consultant. He noted that the committee had planned to discuss updated COVID-19 vaccine guidance in June but was preempted by the administration’s decision.
The policy change follows years of polarized debate over COVID-19 vaccine safety and necessity, particularly for low-risk groups. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary argued in the announcement video that "there was no evidence that healthy children need routine COVID shots," pointing to similar rollbacks in other countries.
However, the CDC’s website maintains that global studies support the safety and benefits of vaccination during pregnancy. Dr. Cody Meissner, a pediatrician at Dartmouth, backed the new guidance, stating that past recommendations were "based on politics" rather than evolving data on the virus’s reduced severity in children.
Legal experts warn that sidelining the ACIP could weaken the CDC’s authority. Dorit Reiss, a health law professor at UC Law San Francisco, noted on social media that circumventing the advisory panel might complicate future litigation over vaccine policies. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies Moderna and Pfizer—key COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers—declined to comment on the shift.
The Biden administration’s reversal signals a broader reassessment of COVID-19 vaccine policies amid declining public trust in federal health agencies. While critics argue the move undermines scientific rigor, supporters frame it as a necessary correction to overreach. As the debate continues, the decision highlights enduring tensions between public health mandates and individual liberty—a conflict that has defined the pandemic era.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Secretary Kennedy ends COVID vaccine recommendations for healthy kids and pregnant women — but fails to dismantle deadly mRNA fraud
The U.S. government has taken a half-step toward acknowledging the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines — but stopped far short of the decisive action needed to end one of the greatest medical frauds in history. In a surprise announcement, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. revealed that the CDC will no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children and pregnant women. While this marks a rare retreat from the pharmaceutical industry’s aggressive vaccine mandates, Kennedy’s weak-kneed approach leaves the door wide open for continued abuse. The mRNA shots — linked to heart damage, neurological disorders, and sudden deaths — remain on the market, shielded from accountability. This isn’t just a failure of policy; it’s a betrayal of the millions harmed by a corrupt system that prioritized profits over human life.
Key points:
• The CDC has quietly removed COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women, bypassing its own advisory committee.
• HHS Secretary RFK Jr. framed the move as "common sense," but critics say it’s a hollow gesture that fails to ban the dangerous shots entirely.
• The decision follows mounting evidence that COVID-19 poses minimal risk to healthy children, while the vaccines carry severe, often hidden dangers.
• Experts warn that without full market removal, Big Pharma will continue pushing unnecessary boosters under the guise of "public health."
• The Biden administration previously ignored clinical data, pushing boosters for kids despite zero proof of benefit — now, the reversal exposes their lies.
A hollow victory: CDC caves — but leaves deadly shots on the shelf
Kennedy’s announcement, made alongside FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, signals a rare crack in the government’s unwavering support for COVID-19 vaccines. "There’s no evidence healthy kids need it today," Kennedy declared, echoing a truth that independent researchers have shouted for years. But while the move is being spun as progress, it’s a calculated sidestep — not a reckoning.
The CDC’s traditional process, where its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) votes on recommendations, was entirely bypassed. Dr. William Schaffner, an ACIP consultant, admitted the system had been "turned upside down." But the real scandal isn’t the procedural shake-up — it’s the fact that the CDC ever recommended these shots for children in the first place.
Pfizer’s own data showed its booster study on kids involved just 140 children — far too few to detect rare side effects. Yet the CDC rubber-stamped it anyway. Now, after years of coercion, the agency is backing off — but only after countless children were injured.
The silent victims: Pregnant women and children sacrificed to Pharma profits
Perhaps the most damning admission in Kennedy’s announcement is the quiet acknowledgment that COVID-19 vaccines were never necessary for healthy pregnant women. The CDC had aggressively pushed the shots, claiming they were "safe and effective" for expectant mothers — despite zero long-term safety studies. Now, with no fanfare, they’ve reversed course.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A warning to free thinkers
This isn’t mere oversight overreach. It’s existential threat to democracy. When questioning a CDC briefing becomes “radicalization,” and protesting your right for equal treatment under the law is grounds for FBI “assessments,” dissent becomes a punishable crime and the government has become a totalitarian nightmare.
In the uncovered documents, the FBI acknowledges this contradiction: “Advocacy or activism … may be constitutionally protected.” But who enforces that? These agencies, of course—are not judges, nor juries, yet they pretend they can define what is an acceptable form of advocacy or activism.
“Critics of asymmetric federal power have a right to their opinions,” said constitutional attorney Johnèmes, who represents families targeted. “But now, government data tagging turns disagreement into a precursor to terrorism. That’s Orwellian.”
Facts don’t need conspiracy theories to be shocking. The Biden regime's own documents reveal how convenient it has become to spread extremism hysteria and use police state authority to quash dissent. When parents Google vaccine side effects, their fingerprints end up in a counter terrorism database. When truckers protest wage theft masked as “pandemic policy,” they’re marked as suspects.
None of the measures taken during the Biden years were about public health. It was all about coercion, targeting dissent, and controlling populations.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
DANGER: Pregnant Czech women VAXXED for COVID LOST their BABIES 33% more often than fully unvaccinated – 1.3 million pregnant women studied
Over a million pregnant women in the Czech Republic were analyzed for a study conducted to see if the COVID-19 vaccines lead to unsuccessful births of their babies, and sure enough, the dirty, deadly clot shot jabs may be the culprit for at least one third of the pregnancies turning into miscarriages or still births. What a shame.
This is a catastrophic effect on fertility, and just another confirmation that it’s no conspiracy theory to assume the spike protein prions from the mRNA jabs travel to the womb and the mother’s immune system attacks the foreign virus-mimicking particles and ends up killing the baby.
1. Vaccine-Induced Pregnancy Loss–A study in the Czech Republic reportedly found that COVID-19 vaccines caused one-third of pregnancies in vaccinated women (ages 18–39) to end in miscarriages or stillbirths (200,000+ fetal deaths from 2021–2023),suggesting spike proteins or nanoparticles may trigger the mother’s immune system to attack the fetus.
2. Depopulation & Biological Warfare–The text asserts that COVID-19 vaccines are intentionally designed to cause infertility, blood clots, and organ damage as part of a global depopulation agenda, framing them as "weapons of mass destruction" disguised as medicine.
3. Warning Against Figures & Future Vaccines – Figures like Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates are accused of orchestrating a plandemicplandemic", with warnings against future vaccines (e.g., bird flu, mad cow disease) as similarly dangerous.
4. Call for Legal Action & Public Warning – The text demands that vaccine creators be "tried for mass murder" and urges women worldwide to avoid mRNA vaccines, portraying them as genocidal tools targeting pregnant women and children.
The study was conducted nationwide in Czechoslovakia for women ages 18 – 39 from January 2021 through December of 2023. That’s over 200,000 deaths of the babies whose mother’s got stabbed with plandemic vaccines. What could it be about the Fauci Flu jabs that causes the babies in the womb to die? Are the vaccines planned to do this?Do the nanoparticles seek out the fetus and collect in its embryonic fluid, invade its organs, clog its blood, or just tell the mom’s immune system that the baby is a foreign invader, like a huge pathogen or parasite, and kill it?
For the next scamdemic, women around the world should take heed of this study and avoid the mRNA clot shots like the plague
For the next plandemic, women around the world should take heed of this study and think twice before getting the Bill Gates Bird Flu injections, or Cat Flu jabs, or Mad Cow Disease stabs. Looks like the “fully unvaccinated” knew exactly what they were talking about when they all said avoid the Covid clot shots like the plague.They are obviously depopulation weapons, biological warfare on humanity,and genocidal suicide for humans, including children, infants, and pregnant mothers.
If it’s true that COVID-19 vaccines caused one-third of pregnancies in vaccinated women (ages 18–39) to end in miscarriages or stillbirths between 2021–2023, amounting to over 200,000 fetal deaths, then the people who created these vaccines and pushed them so vehemently should be tried for mass murder and conspiracy to commit murder.The study reveals that spike proteins or nanoparticles from mRNA vaccines may trigger the mother’s immune system to attack the fetus, treating it as a foreign pathogen.
The Covid nanoparticle vaccines seem to be intentionally designed to cause infertility, blood clots, and organ damage as part of a global depopulation agenda, like weapons of mass destruction camouflaged as medicine. This is a dire warning against future vaccines (e.g.,bird flu,mad cow disease) and frames COVID-19 shots as genocidal tools targeting pregnant women, infants, and children.
The tone is highly conspiratorial, accusing figures like Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates of orchestrating a "plandemic" with deadly outcomes.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
The great vaccine debate: Unmasking America’s aggressive COVID-19 booster policy
In a recent paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Vinay Prasad and Dr. Martin A. Makary challenge the U.S.'s aggressive approach to annual Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) boosters.
Prasad, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and FDA Commissioner Makary argue that the policy, which recommends boosters for virtually everyone, is not supported by robust scientific evidence and may be driven more by political expediency than medical necessity. Prasad and Makary highlight the lack of conclusive evidence that repeat dosing of COVID-19 vaccines provides a net benefit, particularly for low-risk individuals who have already received multiple doses or have had multiple infections. They point out that the policy is unmatched by other high-income nations, which have taken a more cautious approach.
The authors acknowledge the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines as a significant achievement but question the wisdom of bypassing standard safety protocols through the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). They argue that the lack of long-term safety data and the dismissal of critical questions about risk undermine the credibility of the current booster strategy.
In his analysis, another author, Roman Bystrianyk, argues that the true conquerors of infectious diseases were not vaccines but rather improvements in public health infrastructure. He cites the work of honest physicians who have noted for decades that clean water, adequate nutrition and humane living conditions have been the real drivers of public health improvements.
Bystrianyk points to the decline in mortality rates of diseases like measles and whooping cough before the introduction of vaccines. He argues that societal transformation, not medical intervention, was the key factor in reducing the burden of infectious diseases.
The data on flu vaccines
The critique of COVID-19 boosters is further supported by the track record of flu vaccines. A 2023 paper by Morens, Taubenberger and Fauci admits that after six decades, flu vaccines have failed to control respiratory viruses effectively. The authors highlight the minimal improvement in vaccine prevention of infection and the inadequacy of current vaccines for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases.
This data raises questions about the assumption that COVID-19 boosters will follow a different path and achieve better results. The historical failure of flu vaccines to control respiratory viruses suggests that the current booster strategy may be overly optimistic.
The impact on public trust
The aggressive booster policy has had a chilling effect on public trust in vaccination. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), uptake of the annual COVID-19 booster has been poor, with less than 25 percent of Americans receiving boosters each year. Even health care workers remain hesitant, with less than one-third participating in the 2023-2024 fall booster program.
This decline in booster uptake may have a ripple effect, affecting public trust in other vaccination programs. The authors argue that the collapse of trust reflects a growing awareness of institutional failures and a questioning of the "safe and effective" mantra that has dominated public discourse for decades.
The fundamental question at the heart of the debate is whether the current booster strategy is medically necessary. Prasad and Makary argue that the lack of conclusive evidence of benefit, combined with the potential for harm, calls for a more cautious and evidence-based approach.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Senate report: Biden FDA and CDC failed to warn Americans about COVID-19 vaccine’s cardiovascular risks
A bombshell U.S. Senate report reveals that top health officials in the Biden administration suppressed early warnings about myocarditis risks linked to mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, particularly in young males, despite receiving alerts as early as February 2021.
The 55-page interim report released Wednesday, May 21, by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) accuses the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of downplaying cardiac risks and delaying public notifications. These actions may have endangered millions of vaccinated Americans, he continued.
Johnson's probe, based on 2,473 pages of subpoenaed documents, showed that federal agencies had evidence of myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation) cases among vaccine recipients – but hesitated to issue formal warnings. Internal emails cited in the report disclosed that in May 2021, then-FDA Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock and CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky clashed over whether to release a Health Alert Network (HAN) bulletin explicitly warning clinicians about post-vaccination heart inflammation.
Woodcock wrote that the FDA did "not concur" with the advisory, while the CDC's own Vaccine Safety Technical Work Group had endorsed it just days earlier. Instead, the agencies opted for watered-down "clinical considerations" on the CDC website. The two agencies omitted critical guidance, such as restricting physical activity for young patients, that could have mitigated harm.
The delay came despite early red flags. In February 2021, Israeli health officials alerted the CDC to a surge in myocarditis cases among young vaccine recipients. By April, U.S. military doctors, including immunologist Renata Engler, warned that the CDC's V-safe surveillance system failed to track cardiac symptoms like chest pain, leaving critical gaps in safety data.
Engler asked in a presentation obtained by Senate investigators: "If you do not ask, you will not see it, but does that mean it does not exist?" Yet, it wasn't until late June 2021 – months after internal debates – that the FDA updated vaccine fact sheets to include myocarditis warnings.
The truth about COVID-19 vaccine dangers finally out in the open
The report also highlighted alarming data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). As of April, VAERS recorded 38,607 deaths and 1.6 million adverse events linked to COVID-19 vaccines. This number far exceeded vaccine injury reports linked to the flu vaccine for more than 35 years.
As per Johnson's report, a quarter of those deaths occurred within 48 hours of vaccination. Despite these figures, federal health officials continued promoting the shots as "safe and effective" without disclosing emerging risks.
On the same day as the report's release, Microvascular Research Foundation President Dr. Jordan Vaughn testified before Congress. During a Wednesday hearing convened by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, he condemned the lack of transparency on the two agencies' part.
"Literally the job of the FDA [and] CDC is to regulate our products and inform practitioners about dangers as soon as they see them," Vaughn told lawmakers. He criticized the decision to withhold a HAN alert, arguing it deprived physicians of critical information needed to diagnose and treat vaccine-related myocarditis.
The report underscores a pattern of obstruction. Johnson's committee issued a subpoena in January 2025 after the Biden administration ignored over 70 oversight requests. While the Department of Health and Human Services has since released documents, many were heavily redacted – raising questions about what remains hidden.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Moderna withdraws flu-COVID vaccine application amid heightened FDA scrutiny
Moderna has withdrawn its application for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of its experimental mRNA-1083 combination vaccine for the flu and Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
The Massachusetts-based drug firm announced the withdrawal on Wednesday, May 21. It added, however, that its application for the two-in-one injection will be resubmitted once Phase 3 trial data for its standalone mRNA-1010 flu vaccine becomes available later this year. mRNA-1010 is one of the two components that make up the combination shot.
The withdrawal came a day after the FDA signaled stricter requirements for COVID-19 booster approvals, reflecting the agency's heightened scrutiny under new federal health leadership and growing skepticism about the safety and efficacy of multi-antigen vaccines.
Under new FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, the regulator has demanded new clinical trials before approving annual COVID-19 boosters for healthy individuals under 65. Earlier, the agency limited Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine to high-risk groups – signaling a shift toward more rigorous safety evaluations.
Nevertheless, the delay has rattled investors – with Moderna's shares dropping 1.4 percent in premarket trading. This further compounded the company's 30 percent decline this year amid dwindling COVID-19 vaccine sales.
Prioritize long-term safety over rapid approvals
Moderna President Stephen Hoge downplayed the setback, telling investors that waiting for flu vaccine data was the "most pragmatic approach." The company still expects FDA approval for its next-generation mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine – another component of the withdrawn mRNA-1083 combination shot – by the end of June.
However, Moderna's financial outlook remains uncertain. Once a pandemic-era darling, the company has struggled with declining demand for COVID-19 vaccines and underwhelming sales of its respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot, leading to a shareholder lawsuit alleging misleading efficacy claims.
The FDA's stricter stance aligns with broader policy shifts. Reports stated that the Department of Health and Human Services, the FDA's parent agency, plans to halt COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for pregnant women and children.
GreenMedInfo's Sayer Ji called Moderna's withdrawal "telling," suggesting it may reflect concerns over "hastily developed, multi-antigen formulations that lack sufficient long-term safety data." He warned that combination mRNA vaccines introduce poorly understood risks, including potential immune dysregulation and autoimmunity.
Health freedom advocate Dr. Joseph Sansone argued that public health efforts should focus on mitigating alleged harms from existing vaccines rather than accelerating new ones. "Most people you know will have a shortened lifespan due to the COVID injections," he argued.
As Moderna recalibrates its strategy, the withdrawal underscores a pivotal moment in vaccine policy – one that may prioritize transparency and long-term safety over rapid approvals. Whether this shift stems from scientific caution or political influence remains a topic of debate. But for now, the era of emergency authorizations appears to be waning.
Watch this news report about Moderna suspending plans to build a vaccine plant in Kenya due to dwindling COVID-19 vaccine demand.
https://www.brighteon.com/9d6a108b-16fb-4b26-9c89-35d67aaa8f8a
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA orders stricter cardiac inflammation warnings for Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has mandated updated warning labels for Pfizer and Moderna's mRNA vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), citing new evidence of persistent heart muscle damage in young males months after vaccination.
The regulator outlined this instruction in two letters dated April 17 and addressed to Pfizer representative Heather Hufnagel and Moderna representative Brady Nesbitt. The letters, which were only made public on Wednesday, May 21 – were signed by Richard Forshee, acting director of the FDA's Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance under the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
The correspondence followed a landmark study published in The Lancet revealing abnormal cardiac MRI findings in adolescents and young adults diagnosed with post-vaccine myocarditis, a potentially fatal inflammation of the heart muscle. The move raises urgent questions about long-term risks, transparency and why federal agencies delayed public disclosure of these findings for over a year after initial detection.
The FDA's letters to both manufacturers, obtained by the Epoch Times, revealed a critical shift. The highest incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis now applies to males aged 16 to 25, up from previous age brackets of 12 to 17 for Pfizer and 18 to 24 for Moderna.
Forshee cited data showing that nearly 60 percent of patients in a 333-person cohort still exhibited myocardial injury markers five months post-diagnosis. "The clinical and prognostic significance of these findings is not known," he wrote, albeit emphasizing that most cases showed improvement over time.
FDA's 13-month delay on heart risk study sparks outrage
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention maintains a "causal association" between mRNA vaccines and heart inflammation. However, it reported no spike in myocarditis for COVID-19 vaccine formulations released between 2023 and this year.
Yet critics highlight gaps. They pointed to the FDA's 13-month silence on the Lancet study, incomplete VAERS and V-Safe surveillance systems and Pfizer's deferred deadlines for subclinical myocarditis reporting.
A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services defended the process in an email to the Epoch Times. "Americans deserve radical transparency around the safety and efficacy of COVID vaccines, and the FDA is delivering on their promise to do just that," they wrote.
Historical parallels abound. The 1976 swine flu vaccine debacle, halted after 450 Guillain-Barré syndrome cases, underscores the stakes of rapid vaccine rollouts without robust post-market scrutiny.
Moderna and Pfizer now face a 30-day deadline to update labels or risk penalties, but the FDA's delayed action has fueled skepticism. With 38 myocarditis cases per million doses in high-risk males and unresolved questions about cardiac outcomes, the updated warnings mark a pivotal moment in the pandemic's legacy – one where trust in public health institutions hinges on candor about known risks.
As the FDA pledges stronger monitoring, the burden falls on providers and patients to weigh vaccination benefits against emerging evidence. For young males, the calculus just grew more complex.
Watch Dr. Peter McCullough @P_McCulloughMD warning that vaccine-induced myocarditis is much more serious than myocarditis as a result of COVID-19 infection.
https://www.brighteon.com/7333034d-671c-413c-bfef-8b59d15929f4
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
METHOD OF OPERATION SINISTER: Get everyone vaccinated for Covid BEFORE they figure out how deadly the mRNA jabs really are – that was the plot
Yes, warnings about the dangers of the Covid jabs were delayed for months and years so everyone would hurry and get injected with mRNA “technology” that drives all-cause-mortality rates through the roof. It was all about depopulation, and the end-game of the plandemic was to get as many idiots and brainwashed vaxxers injected before the natural health advocates gained enough scientific proof and exposed the Fauci Flu jabs for exactly what they are – plandemic bioweapons of mass destruction.
The whole scamdemic was about deadly vaccines. That was the sinister method of operation behind all the propaganda and fear-mongering. Behind all the faked death statistics that said people died of Covid, with Covid, while Coviding, you name it.
Report alleges U.S. health officials delayed warning public about COVID vaccine myocarditis risks
A new congressional report alleges that U.S. health officials under the Biden administration knew about the risk of myocarditis linked to COVID-19 vaccines months before issuing public warnings, potentially endangering young Americans. Released on May 21 by the office of Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), the report claims the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) delayed updating vaccine labels despite mounting evidence. The findings come as concerns over vaccine-related heart inflammation fuel declining booster uptake and renewed scrutiny of federal health transparency.
According to the report, federal agencies were aware of myocarditis cases tied to Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine as early as February 2021 but did not update safety labels until June. By then, reports of heart inflammation had surged from 158 cases in April to over 750 by early June. The report states: “Even though CDC and FDA officials were well aware of the risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, the Biden administration opted to withhold issuing a formal warning to the public for months about the safety concerns, jeopardizing the health of young Americans.”
Israeli health officials had also alerted U.S. agencies in April 2021 about rising myocarditis cases among vaccinated youth, but the FDA dismissed the data as “incomplete.” Meanwhile, the Biden administration expanded vaccine eligibility to adolescents in May 2021, downplaying risks as “rare.”
Recent studies suggest myocarditis may be more common than initially reported. A 2023 study found that 1 in 35 booster recipients showed signs of myocardial injury. Such findings have contributed to declining booster uptake, with skepticism growing over federal health messaging. The controversy echoes past public health controversies, such as the delayed acknowledgment of heart risks linked to certain medications, raising questions about transparency in crisis management.
The report intensifies scrutiny of how U.S. health agencies balanced urgency and caution during the pandemic. Vaccine critics argue that withholding potential risks eroded public trust. As booster campaigns continue under extended emergency declarations, the fallout from these revelations may shape future vaccine policies — and the public’s willingness to follow them.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA forces Pfizer, Moderna to admit COVID vaccines cause lasting heart damage in young males
For years, parents and medical professionals have sounded the alarm about the dangerous link between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and heart inflammation in young males—only to be dismissed as "anti-vaxxers" or conspiracy theorists. Now, in a stunning reversal, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has ordered Pfizer and Moderna to strengthen their warning labels, finally admitting that these shots can cause long-lasting heart damage, particularly in adolescent boys and young men.
But this admission comes far too late—after millions of doses were administered under false pretenses, after countless young lives were altered by myocarditis, and after public health agencies actively suppressed the truth. The FDA’s belated action raises a critical question: How many more injuries could have been prevented if the government had prioritized transparency over blind vaccine promotion?
Key points:
• The FDA has mandated that Pfizer and Moderna update their COVID-19 vaccine labels to include stronger warnings about myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in males aged 16 to 25.
• New data reveals that myocardial injury is often long-lasting, contradicting earlier CDC claims that heart inflammation "tends to resolve quickly."
• The highest incidence of myocarditis occurs in young males, with 38 cases per million doses—far higher than previously acknowledged.
• Internal government emails show that health officials deliberately avoided warning the public about these risks, even after detecting safety signals in 2021.
• The FDA’s action follows a Senate investigation exposing how federal agencies downplayed and hid vaccine injuries.
A long-overdue admission of harm
For years, independent researchers and medical professionals warned that mRNA vaccines posed a disproportionate risk to young, healthy individuals—especially males. Yet, public health agencies dismissed these concerns, insisting that the benefits outweighed the risks. Now, the FDA has been forced to acknowledge what health freedom fighters have said all along: These vaccines can cause serious, sometimes permanent, heart damage.
The updated labels must now state that myocardial injury is common among those who develop post-vaccination myocarditis, with data showing persistent damage five months after vaccination. This directly contradicts the CDC’s previous assurances that cases were "mild" and "resolved quickly."
Why did it take so long? Internal documents obtained through FOIA requests reveal that as early as May 2021, the CDC and FDA considered issuing a public warning but ultimately chose silence over transparency.
The suppression of truth and the cost of deception
The Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations recently released a damning report exposing how federal health agencies systematically concealed the myocarditis risk linked to COVID-19 vaccines. Internal emails reveal that officials engaged in a coordinated cover-up by refusing to update the V-safe reporting system to include cardiac symptoms, ensuring countless cases were never documented. Additionally, they blocked a planned Health Alert Network warning that would have alerted doctors and the public to the dangers, prioritizing public perception over transparency.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Kennedy’s critics, including Offit, target his legal background, suggesting his concerns are self-serving. “He’s still in the personal injury lawyer business,” Offit declared, dismissing legitimate claims by implying ulterior motives. Yet Kennedy remains unapologetic, framing the issue as a crisis of integrity: “The American people deserve honest science and transparency — not deceptive labels promoting a substandard product.”
A wake-up call for health freedom
The Merck scandal underscores a broader failure in pharmaceutical accountability, where corporate interests override public health. With the FDA continuing to endorse MMRII and no vaccines tested against placebos, millions remain at risk of adverse reactions and ineffective protection.
As parents, healthcare providers, and policymakers confront vaccine mandates and rising outbreaks, people are uncovering the truth. The American people are owed answers: Why did Merck escape consequences after admitting fraud? And why do public health agencies cling to corrupted data?
As Dr. Hooker warns, “We’re in no-man’s-land” — a sentiment echoing far beyond the mumps vaccine. The battle for transparency is as much about reclaiming autonomy over our health as it is about holding power to account.
The unraveling of Merck’s mumps vaccine cover-up lays bare a system where profit and secrecy eclipse public safety. With courts enabling corporate misconduct and experts debating “cui bono” motives, the real question remains: Where do we go from here? The path forward demands rigorous transparency, dissenting voices in science, and a renewed commitment to health freedom — one shot at a time.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), will need to consider these findings when evaluating the safety of mRNA vaccines. Smith suggested, "Regulators should take these findings seriously and consider updating their guidelines for post-vaccination monitoring."
In summary, the study provides strong evidence of a link between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and an increased risk of thyroid disease. The findings underscore the need for continued monitoring, research and transparency in vaccine safety. As the world grapples with the long-term impacts of the pandemic, this study serves as a reminder that vigilance and open dialogue are essential for protecting public health.
Watch the video below that talks about the ban on mRNA vaccines.
https://www.brighteon.com/10cf597d-9910-44af-b069-f28f54eb1496
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The report’s critics — pesticide lobbyists, processed-food manufacturers, and vaccine profiteers — are already circling the wagons. Bayer dismissed the findings as "not fact-based," while farm groups whined about "closed-door" drafting. But Kennedy’s team isn’t backing down. The next phase, due in August, will push for concrete policy changes: banning harmful food additives, reforming agricultural chemical approvals, and dismantling coercive vaccine mandates.
This is more than a policy shift — it’s a cultural revolution. Parents, armed with truth, are rejecting the lies that left their children sick and abandoned. The question isn’t whether America can clean up its food, environment, and medical system — it’s whether it has the courage to defy the corporations that profit from sickness. Kennedy’s report is the first shot in a new phase of the war.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The DOJ’s decision to pursue the case underscores the gravity of the allegations. If convicted, Cuomo could face fines or even prison time, although legal experts note that prosecuting high-profile politicians is notoriously difficult. Still, the investigation ensures that his disastrous pandemic record will remain a central issue in his mayoral campaign.
The DOJ’s investigation into Andrew Cuomo raises critical questions about accountability for leaders who mishandled the pandemic. Thousands of New Yorkers died due to his administration’s reckless policies, and if the allegations are proven, Cuomo’s lies to Congress could finally catch up with him. His defenders might be trying to dismiss the probe as a partisan attack, but the facts suggest otherwise. Whether justice prevails or political maneuvering wins out, Cuomo’s legacy is forever damaged by the lives lost under his watch.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Universal flu vaccine advancing: Government’s chimeric experiment risks unleashing uncontrollable mutations, sets pretense for new pandemics
As the U.S. government quietly advances plans for a "universal" flu vaccine stitched together from fragments of multiple viruses, a critical question emerges: Is this about preventing pandemics—or engineering them? The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has confirmed clinical trials for a synthetic, chimeric flu shot by 2026, built using molecular mashups of influenza strains. But with the Department of Defense bankrolling this biotech experiment, and gain-of-function research on bird flu already underway, the line between public health and biological warfare blurs. This isn’t just another flu shot—it’s a Frankenstein creation that could force unpredictable mutations, priming immune systems for failure while locking populations into endless booster cycles.
Key points:
• The GAO confirms a 2026 rollout for a "universal" flu vaccine made from fused virus fragments—a molecular chimera with unknown long-term risks.
• The Department of Defense, NIH, and HHS are collaborating on the project, raising concerns about dual-use bioweapons potential.
• Despite claims of broad protection, the GAO admits boosters will still be required, exposing the "universal" label as misleading.
• The U.S. government has already spent $500 million on bird flu vaccine development while funding gain-of-function research on the same virus.
• Historical parallels to COVID-19 gain-of-function experiments suggest a manufactured crisis could be in the works.
The chimeric blueprint: A vaccine or a bioweapon?
The GAO’s report reveals a disturbing truth: Scientists are artificially fusing viral strains to create a synthetic flu shot that doesn’t exist in nature. This "next-generation platform" isn’t designed to end pandemics—it’s designed to target them after they’re unleashed. The Department of Defense’s involvement hints at darker motives, particularly given the military’s history of biodefense programs that blur ethical boundaries.
The technology mirrors gain-of-function experiments, where viruses are deliberately manipulated to enhance transmissibility or lethality. With H5N1 bird flu already weaponized in U.S. labs, this "universal" vaccine could serve as both the problem and the solution—a self-perpetuating cycle of outbreaks and rushed inoculations.
For decades, flu vaccines have failed to provide lasting immunity, with efficacy rates as low as 10% in some seasons. The reason? Influenza’s rapid mutation rate, exacerbated by mass vaccination campaigns that pressure the virus to adapt. By injecting millions with mismatched strains, the vaccine industry has created an environment where influenza thrives—sickening immunocompromised individuals and trapping them in a profit-driven cycle of boosters.
Now, the government’s chimeric vaccine threatens to escalate this arms race. Combining multiple viral fragments into a single dose could trigger robust mutations across respiratory pathogens, rendering natural immunity obsolete. As the GAO admits, even this "universal" shot won’t eliminate the need for boosters—proving the entire premise is a facade.
Bird flu: The manufactured crisis
The Trump administration’s $500 million "Generation Gold Standard" initiative, focused on avian influenza vaccines,ly withly with the government’s long-standing bird flu gain-of-function projects. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has touted the program as "comprehensive preparedness," but the timing is telling. With new rules allowing secretaries to waive oversight for dangerous research, the stage is set for another lab-leak scenario—one conveniently "solved" by pre-stocked vaccines.
History repeats itself: Just as COVID-19 emerged from taxpayer-funded Wuhan lab experiments, H5N1 could be the next orchestrated pandemic. The NIH’s claim that its vaccines will protect against "flu threats that haven’t even emerged yet" isn’t visionary—it’s an admission of foreknowledge.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Dr. Cody Meissner, a pediatrician who opposed masking children during the COVID tyranny, called the previous recommendations "political." He’s right. The CDC’s flip-flop proves that science was never the priority — compliance was. Meanwhile, pregnant women who trusted the government now face potential fertility issues, miscarriages, and birth defects linked to the shots.
The fight isn’t over: Why market removal is the only solution
Kennedy’s tepid "reform" does nothing to stop the next wave of mRNA boosters. Insurers like CVS and Blue Cross Blue Shield are still reviewing whether to drop coverage — meaning the financial incentives for pushing these shots remain intact. Worse, by leaving vague definitions of "healthy" versus "at-risk" individuals, the CDC ensures doctors can still pressure families into taking the jab.
True justice would mean pulling COVID-19 vaccines from the market entirely, prosecuting those who lied about their safety, and compensating the victims. Instead, Kennedy’s milquetoast compromise lets the criminals walk free. Until every last dose is recalled, the depopulation agenda marches on.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Famous NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers featured on Joe Rogan Experience throws COVID mRNA CLOT SHOTS under the bus
The Left and Big Pharma have a “number one” enemy now and his name is Joe Rogan. Only the most popular podcaster in the world, has converted from being pro-vaccine and pro-big-media to the enemy of the Vaccine Industrial Complex, featuring whistleblowers like Dr. Robert Malone, Elon Musk, celebrities and athletes who are finally coming out about the PLANDEMIC SCAM of dirty, deadly mRNA clot shots.
Now famous people around the world are discussing the deadly Covid clot shot on the most popular podcasts in the world, influencing millions of people to question the so-called “safe and effective” narrative that every vaccine pusher, including the CDC and WHO, always claim about every jab, including the deadliest ones of all, the mRNA protein prion, gene-mutating, depopulation stabs.
Florida Surgeon General Warns of COVID-19 Vaccine Risks as Study Links Shots to Increased Mortality
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo has intensified his warnings about COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, citing a recent study that suggests heightened risks of cardiac-related deaths among young men and broader mortality concerns. The findings, discussed in a high-profile conversation between host Joe host Joe Rogan and NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers, have reignited debates over vaccine safety and government health policies.
A study co-authored by Ladapo and published last month analyzed 1.47 million Florida adults who received either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines. The research found that Pfizer recipients faced higher 12-month risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and COVID-19-related fatalities compared to Moderna recipients. Independent analyses extrapolated these findings to estimate between 470,000 and 600,000 American deaths linked to mRNA vaccines—a toll surpassing combined U.S. fatalities in World War I, World War II, and the Vietnam War.
Dr. Nicholas Hulscher, who reported on the study, noted a vaccine dose fatality rate (vDFR) of 0.157% for Pfizer, translating to roughly one death per 636 doses administered.
Ladapo has long challenged mainstream narratives on vaccine safety. In 2023, he advised against new mRNA COVID-19 boosters, stating, “There’s essentially no evidence for There’ There’s been no clinical trials done in human beings showing it benefits people.” He also highlighted studies suggesting mRNA vaccines may increase susceptibility to COVID-19 over time—a claim he called “not normal.”
His latest warnings align with Florida’s broader pushback against federal health guidance, including his recent recommendation to remove fluoride from drinking water due to potential neurodevelopmental risks.
The debate over vaccine safety reflects deepening divisions in public health policy. While federal agencies continue endorsing COVID-19 vaccinations, critics like Ladapo argue that insufficient scrutiny has been given to potential harms. The Florida study adds fuel to ongoing discussions about transparency, risk assessment individual choice individual choice in medical decisions.
As questions about mRNA vaccine safety persist, Ladapo’s warnings—amplified by figures like Rogan and Rodgers—underscore the need for further independent research. With public trust in health institutions wavering, the controversy highlights the delicate balance between rapid medical innovation and long-term safety assurances. For now, Florida remains a vocal outlier in challenging federal health directives.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Biden regime weaponized terror watch lists to silence COVID mandate dissent, documents expose
On a typical Tuesday in 2021, Sarah, a mother from Ohio, posted a question online: “Are the side effects of child vaccines worse than catching the virus?” That question made her a potential “threat” to national security. Documents recently exposed by investigative journalists reveal how the Biden administration, alongside federal agencies, weaponized anti-extremism rhetoric to classify critics of totalitarian pandemic policies as “domestic violent extremists”—a label that justified mass surveillance, parental false guilt, and the erosion of free speech. This wasn’t a response to terrorism; it was a bureaucratic war on dissent.
Key points:
• Federal agencies redefined extremism to include opposition to mask and vaccine mandates by 2021, classifying critics as potential threats.
• A December 2021 bulletin by the DHS, FBI, and NCTC labeled concerns over vaccine safety and mandates as red flags for “violent mobilization,” despite lacking evidence.
• Over 100 million Americans faced mandates or passport systems, sparking protests that were reframed as extremist threats rather than public health debates.
• Internal reports admit most “domestic terrorism” cases involve non-violent acts like protesting, or not getting experimental vaccines - echoing historical abuses of power to suppress dissent.
Dissent vs. democracy
The transformation of dissent into a national threat was no accident. Before 2021, “domestic violent extremists” referred to groups like the KKK or violent militias. But a December 13, 2021, Joint Intelligence bulletin—authored jointly by the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, and National Counterterrorism Center—expanded the category to include everyday Americans who were questioning the trillion-dollar vaccine mandates. The report explicitly labeled “opposition to mask mandates,” “vaccine safety concerns for children,” and belief that mandates were “government overreach” as precursors to extremism.
This was propaganda, not protection. The report cited no data proving that anti-mandate sentiment directly led to violence. Instead, it speculated with phrases like “might incite unrest” or “could lead to targeted violence against healthcare workers,” tactics straight out of 1984. Parents asking questions were now suspects; truckers honking horns at Capitol Hill ceremonies were “radicalized agitators.”
The playbook mirrored past abuses. FBI files declassified in the 1970s exposed J. Edgar Hoover’s COINTELPRO program, which hunted commie “threats” behind lunch-counters protests. Now, under Biden, the target was parents and rural voters wary of a rush-vetted vaccine. In Document 3 (page 13), anxious applause for myocarditis risks either discovered weeks earlier—then buried.
The FBI's expanding playbook
The December bulletin triggered a bureaucratic avalanche. Suddenly, the FBI’s nearly 3,000 “domestic terrorism” cases included non-violent acts like “joking” about mandates online or attending school board meetings. A June 2022 report revealed that 80% of these cases involved “verbal opposition” rather than violence. One Louisiana woman was investigated after sharing a meme about “vaccine passports” on Facebook.
Agencies leveraged existing conspiracies—like QAnon’s anti-vax rhetoric—to justify broad sweeps. But the report’s logic was circular: because some extremists think X, anyone thinking X is an extremist. By late 2022, Section 230-circumventing policies allowed the FBI to dictate which social media accounts to flag, sidelining the First Amendment.
The consequences were chilling. Healthcare workers faced firing for refusing booster shots. Rural communities starved of care as hospitals enforced mandates. Meanwhile, Biden officials hosted round tables with Pfizer executives… all while employers threatened employees with termination for not going along with the experiment.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
They advocate for a reevaluation of the policy, urging policymakers to consider the broader implications of the booster strategy on public health and trust in vaccination. The authors suggest that a more nuanced approach, tailored to individual risk factors and informed by robust scientific evidence, would be more effective in managing the ongoing pandemic.
The debate over the U.S.'s aggressive COVID-19 booster policy highlights the tension between scientific evidence and political expediency. While the rapid development of vaccines was a significant achievement, the lack of long-term safety data and the historical failure of flu vaccines to control respiratory viruses raise important questions about the current strategy.
Watch the video below that talks about Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calling for the expanded testing of COVID-19 vaccines.
https://www.brighteon.com/9be45963-69d9-4e3d-a5fa-dfd9f39e66b3
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The findings arrive amid growing scrutiny of COVID-19 vaccine safety. Yet as the report notes, federal agencies failed to mandate Pfizer's disclosure of pregnancy trial results or require long-term V-safe follow-ups – leaving critical questions unanswered.
For millions of Americans who trusted public health guidance, the Wisconsin senator's revelations mark a stark betrayal. As Johnson's report concluded, "The Biden administration's decision to downplay COVID-19 vaccine risks jeopardized public health."
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree discussing new data that confirms COVID-19 vaccine injuries in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/900dbf22-31a6-49dd-b2ab-436a0988abd7
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA limits COVID-19 vaccine approvals to elderly and high-risk groups, but millions still eligible
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that it will restrict future Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine approvals to individuals aged 65 and older and those at high risk due to underlying health conditions or occupational exposure.
On Tuesday, May 20, FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad of the agency's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research acknowledged that public confidence in COVID-19 vaccines has waned, with fewer than 25 percent of Americans receiving the latest booster. Uptake is particularly low among children (under 10 percent) and healthcare workers (less than one in six). The agency suggested that aggressive vaccination policies may have inadvertently eroded trust in other routine immunizations, including the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.
In line with this, Makary and Prasad outlined in an article published for the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that the FDA now plans to limit updated vaccine authorizations primarily to high-risk groups, those over 65 and individuals with underlying health conditions, while requiring vaccine makers to conduct randomized clinical trials demonstrating effectiveness in preventing severe outcomes (symptomatic infection, hospitalization or death) before approving vaccines for healthy individuals aged six months to 64 years.
Under the new framework, vaccine manufacturers must demonstrate that their shots prevent symptomatic infection, hospitalization or death in healthy individuals before gaining full FDA approval. However, immunocompromised adults, seniors and those with conditions like obesity or depression, estimated at 100-200 million Americans, will remain eligible under existing emergency use authorizations.
The agency encourages post-marketing trials for healthy adults. Still, it has not yet clarified whether CDC will adjust its recommendations or remove COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood immunization schedule.
HHS to drop routine COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children, pregnant women
Aside from restricting future COVID-19 vaccine approvals for high-risk groups, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) also announced its plan to rescind long-standing CDC recommendations that children, teenagers and pregnant women receive COVID-19 vaccines as a matter of routine.
The move comes amid growing skepticism about the necessity of vaccinating low-risk populations, including young children, who face an exceedingly low likelihood of severe COVID-19 outcomes, and pregnant women. Critics argue that widespread natural immunity and the minimal threat to these groups make blanket recommendations unnecessary.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic, has long criticized COVID-19 shots, particularly mRNA-based vaccines, and previously petitioned the FDA to revoke their emergency authorization. Sources indicate that the updated CDC guidance may shift from a blanket recommendation to advising individuals to consult physicians about risks and benefits.
The decision also marks a stark departure from Operation Warp Speed, the Trump-era program that fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccines. Critics warn the move could further reduce vaccination rates – already low among children (13 percent) and pregnant women (14 percent) – and potentially lead insurers to drop coverage.
But then, Makary frankly said on May 15, that he is "not encouraging or insisting young, healthy children to get a COVID shot."
"Separate from my role as a regulator at the FDA, I am not encouraging or insisting young, healthy children to get a COVID shot unless there is new evidence that emerges that suggests there is a clear benefit," the commissioner remarked.
Watch this episode of the "Health Ranger Report" as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, sounds the alarm about the possibility of COVID-19 vaccine die-off.
https://www.brighteon.com/72f2d8d5-0d32-474f-af5e-85ef8d227475
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA science freaks deciding which harmless Covid strain to address with a NEW DEADLY clot shot BOOSTER
The vaccine bioweapon depopulation program and freakshow continues. That’s right folks, 5 deadly clot shots is not enough, because there are new strains of Fauci Flu still swarming around the atmosphere in microscopic spit particles from Fauci when he was talking without his mask on at baseball games. Beware. The Food and Drug Adulteration Agency is hard at work playing pin the tail on the donkey, blindfolded, trying to decide which strain of Covid they’ll say is SO DEADLY that children, babies, and pregnant women need to get jabbed with immediately to survive.
Which strain will it be? The Biden-Delta-2025? The JN.1? Is the Bill-Gates-KP.2 and LP8.1 subvariants? The Fauci-Omega-Bird-Cat-Human GOF variant? Will Trump employ the Warp-Speed communists at the Wuhan lab or some rogue Biotech shills at University of North Carolina? Who will make the next deadly jab for the deadliest strain of Covid the world has ever seen? Fake news, get ready.
FDA advisers unanimously recommend JN.1-targeted COVID-19 boosters amid safety concerns
A key FDA advisory panel voted unanimously Thursday to recommend updated COVID-19 booster shots targeting the Omicron JN.1 strain for the 2025-2026 season, despite concerns over transparency and a lack of safety data. The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) concluded that the JN.1-based formula—already used in last year’s shots—would provide three to four months of enhanced protection for those with prior immunity. The decision aligns with recent World Health Organization (WHO) guidance but follows mounting criticism over the FDA’s approval process and calls to pull existing mRNA vaccines from the market.
The VRBPAC meeting, the first under the current administration, centered on selecting the most effective viral strain for next year’s boosters. Dr. Vinay Prasad, the FDA’s new director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, emphasized the need for “open and transparent discussion” but acknowledged gaps in public engagement. The committee opted for a JN.1 vaccine, vaccine, citing its dominance over the past year, including its KP.2 and LP8.1 subvariants. However, no vote was taken on whether to narrow the focus to LP8.1, which now accounts for 70% of U.S. cases.
Critics, including epidemiologist Dr. Meryl Nass, noted the absence of safety data in presentations by Pfizer, Moderna, Novavax, and the CDC. “Not a single presentation actually mentioned safety data. This is entirely unacceptable,” Nass wrote during the meeting. Meanwhile, public commenters like Dr. Brian Hooker of Children’s Health Defense urged the FDA to withdraw mRNA vaccines entirely, citing VAERS reports of 19,400 deaths post-COVID vaccination—far exceeding historical flu vaccine fatalities. “The swine flu vaccine was pulled for just 50 deaths—what are you waiting for?” Hooker asked.
The meeting occurred days after the FDA announced plans to restrict future COVID vaccine approvals to high-risk groups—a move some fear could limit insurance coverage. Committee Chair Dr. Arnold Monto pressed for VRBPAC input on the new framework, but FDA officials deferred further discussion. Dr. Kanta Subbarao of the WHO reiterated that JN.1 boosters offer relative, not absolute, protection, lasting only a few months.
The FDA’s push for annual COVID boosters faces growing scrutiny as scientists and advocates demand stronger safety reviews and accountability. While the JN.1 recommendation advances the agency’s goal of streamlining vaccinations, unresolved questions about efficacy, equity, and risk leave the public awaiting clearer answers—and more rigorous oversight.
Don't forget, Fauci and Biden got 5 Covid jabs plus boosters and still caught Covid multiple times. No wonder Biden has prostate cancer - the spike proteins must have traveled there. What a shame.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Creators of world’s 1st Covid jab call for CAT FLU PANDEMIC VACCINES to be made immediately as GOF-Bird Flu jumps to cats then to humans
It’s the mad, mad rush to make more deadly jabs for fake pandemics so the sheeple will line up in fear of death to get stabbed with needles full of “technology” that drives all-cause-mortality rates through the roof. Go figure. Yes, the makers of the first death jab for Covid-19 Wuhan bat-flu syndrome are screaming in mass-panic for immediate authorization and funding for CAT FLU PANDEMIC JABS in order to save the world from gain-of-function (GOF) Bird Flu that seems to be jumping from birds to cats to humans like acrobats on the flying trapeze.
If you own a cat, be sure to mask them up, have them social distance at 6 feet, keep them locked in their bedroom, and wipe down their litter box with antibacterial cleanser until we can flatten out this CAT FLU PANDEMIC thing and until the creators of Sputnik V finish creating a deadly mRNA spike prion jab that will surely cause white rubbery vascular clots that cause myocarditis, pericarditis, and infertility. This should help depopulate the planet since there are too many cats, humans, birds, and people figuring out that the jabs are end-game of the genocidal maniacs running the bioweapon laboratories.
Russian virologist warns of potential 'Cat Flu' pandemic as H5N1 spreads among felines
A leading Russian virologist has issued a stark warning that the H5N1 avian influenza virus, now spreading among domestic cats, could mutate and trigger a deadly human pandemic. Alexander Gintsburg, head of the Gamaleya Research Institute — which developed the Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine — told Izvestia on Wednesday that the virus’s high fatality rate and potential for airborne transmission could make it far deadlier than smallpox. With over 600 documented feline infections worldwide and a human fatality rate exceeding 50%, health experts are urging rapid vaccine development to avert a potential crisis.
Recent research from the University of Maryland has revealed a concerning rise in H5N1 infections among domestic cats, with cases reported in 18 countries over the past two decades. The study, published in early May, found that more than half of infected cats died, raising alarms about zoonotic spillover to humans.
“Domestic cats are susceptible to [bird flu] and provide a potential pathway for zoonotic spillover to humans,” the researchers warned. While cats typically contract the virus by consuming infected birds or raw dairy from sick livestock, some cases involve indoor cats with no clear exposure, suggesting unknown transmission routes.
Gintsburg emphasized the urgent need for a vaccine prototype that could be mass-produced within weeks if human-to-human transmission emerges. “[A vaccine prototype] should go through Phase I and II clinical trials against the strain that is very likely to start transmitting not just between animals, but from human to human,” he said.
He warned that if H5N1 mutates to spread through the air, the consequences could be catastrophic. “The fatality rate is 50–70%, and if transmitted by air, smallpox will seem like child’s play compared to what could happen after one or two mutations.” However, he noted that Russia currently lacks a program to fast-track such a vaccine.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has recorded 974 human H5N1 cases across 24 countries since 2003, with 470 deaths—most linked to direct poultry exposure. While sustained human transmission has not yet occurred, the CDC and other agencies continue surveillance due to the virus’s high lethality.
As H5N1 adapts to new hosts, including cats and dairy cows, scientists are sounding the alarm over its pandemic potential. While the immediate risk to the general public remains low, Gintsburg’s warning underscores the need for proactive vaccine development and global cooperation to prevent history from repeating itself — this time with a virus far deadlier than COVID-19.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Despite clear evidence that myocarditis could cause long-term heart damage, officials deliberately downplayed its severity, framing it as "mild" and "resolving" to avoid undermining vaccination campaigns. The CDC and White House even held crisis meetings to craft misleading messaging, suppressing critical data while pushing narratives that emphasized rarity and safety. This wasn’t mere negligence—it was a calculated deception, sacrificing informed consent to maintain high vaccination rates. Lawyer Ed Berkovich’s FOIA findings further corroborate this, revealing extensive redactions in CDC documents, particularly those shared with senior White House advisors, suggesting high-level involvement in obscuring the truth. The committee’s failure to act on overwhelming safety signals raises urgent questions about accountability for those who ignored irreversible harm to the public.
The FDA’s new warning is a small step toward accountability, but it doesn’t undo the damage. Millions of young people were injected with these vaccines without being told the full risks. Many now live with chronic heart conditions, while the pharmaceutical companies and government agencies responsible face no consequences.
As the truth continues to emerge, one thing is clear: The COVID-19 vaccine rollout was one of the largest medical experiments in history—and the public was never given the full story. Now, a new HHS leadership must dismantle this medical fraud, and deal with the vaccine injury fallout, one brick at a time.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Former Japanese government official reveals he got cancer from COVID-19 vaccines
A former minister in the Japanese government has revealed that he developed cancer due to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines.
Kazuhiro Hiraguchi, former minister for internal affairs and communications, has become a leading voice against vaccine mandates. The 10-term Japanese lawmaker attributed this cancer to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins from the mRNA injections.
On Monday, May 19, Haraguchi shared details about his vaccine-induced cancer on X. He posted an analysis of his cancer cells, adding that "the malignant lymphoma had metastasized to the tonsils." According to the former minister, the lesions in his tonsils "were removed and sent to a research facility" – with the findings set to be used for a research paper.
"Even two years after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, spike proteins were found in the malignant lymphoma. We must put an end to the tragedies caused by the COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible," Haraguchi said.
The former minister made international headlines last year when he delivered an emotional apology at a Tokyo protest against the World Health Organization. His May 2024 speech resonated with thousands, as he described witnessing widespread suffering. People were unable to walk, work or attend school due to vaccine-related injuries.
"I apologize to all of you. So many have died, and they shouldn't have," Haraguchi said. "We could have prevented these injuries from happening, but we did not."
Haraguchi exposes vaccine dangers in explosive speech
His own health struggles began after receiving three Pfizer shots, two of which he called "lethal batches." Haraguchi's cancer diagnosis prompted him to wear a wig. But a political opponent focused on his wig instead of focusing on government matters.
During an April speech in the National Diet (Japan's legislature), Haraguchi also took the chance to decry the COVID-19 injections. He referenced his vaccine-induced cancer in the said speech.
"Recently, I started to develop this thing in my cells. The spike protein was still present in my body a year and a half after I had taken it," the former minister told his colleagues. "How long do you think this mRNA vaccine will last?"
Haraguchi's advocacy extends beyond vaccines, also encompassing a ban on ivermectin announced by the Land of the Rising Sun. According to him, ivermectin could have played a decisive role in tackling COVID-19 had it not been prohibited.
"[Ivermectin drugs] are cheap. They don't want it because it will interfere with the sales of the vaccines," he said during the May 2024 anti-WHO protest.
In an interview with Reitaku University associate professor Jason Morgan published in the American Conservative Sunday, May 18, Haraguchi disclosed his role in petitioning the Japanese government for a special permit to use ivermectin against COVID-19. However, he also shared that anyone suggesting the use of ivermectin to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection was dubbed a "conspiracy theorist."
For now, Haraguchi's battle is far from over.
His planned research paper on spike proteins in cancer cells could further challenge mainstream narratives, while his call to "defeat those demonic forces" continues to galvanize supporters. In a world grappling with the fallout of pandemic policies, Japan's choices and Haraguchi's defiance remind people that the pursuit of truth often begins with the courage to dissent.
Watch Kazuhiro Haraguchi apologizing for COVID-19 vaccine deaths in this clip.
https://www.brighteon.com/87d13439-5e66-4846-8bc1-f8f5c262e4b2
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Merck’s mumps fraud: A 50-year cover-up exposed as vaccine efficacy claims crumble
In a surprising reversal, MedPage Today admitted the mumps portion of the MMR vaccine “never worked” as promoted, validating years of accusations by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Merck whistleblowers. The acknowledgment, published in May 2025, arrives amid a cascade of revelations about pharmaceutical giant Merck’s systemic fraud — including fabricated safety data, court rulings confirming misconduct and the company’s monopoly over U.S. mumps vaccine distribution for decades.
Kennedy, in an April interview, asserted plainly, “The mumps part of the MMR vaccine has never worked,” citing evidence from two federal lawsuits that demonstrated Merck’s manipulation of vaccine trial data. Yet MedPage Today and health officials like Dr. Paul Offit of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia dismiss Kennedy’s claims, suggesting his critique is rooted in his past as a personal injury lawyer rather than scientific merit.
Fraudulent practices and the Merck whistleblowers
The scandal traces back to the late 1990s, when Merck faked efficacy data for its mumps vaccine, MMRII, to circumvent FDA regulations. Internal whistleblowers Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski exposed the company’s “overfilling” of vaccine doses with excess live virus to meet arbitrary efficacy targets. Despite FDA inspections confirming data falsification in 2004, Merck continued its practices under a legal loophole allowing companies to self-certify drug potency.
In 2010, Krahling and Wlochowski filed a whistleblower lawsuit under the False Claims Act, alleging Merck unlawfully maintained its monopoly by using rigged trials to suppress competition from rival drugmaker GSK. A 2024 federal court ruling later cited Merck’s “misrepresentations” to the FDA but absolved the company of liability under unclear jurisdiction rules. The court document admitted, “[Merck] sought to extend its apparent monopoly by misrepresenting facts about its mumps vaccines on FDA-approved labeling,” yet left the ineffective vaccine untouched.
Failed safety testing and public health risks
Merck’s manipulation extended beyond efficacy claims. The overfilled mumps vaccine was never tested for safety against an inert placebo, despite the government’s purchase of millions of doses for the Vaccines for Children Program. Internal trial data, obtained by whistleblowers, revealed:
• One-third of vaccinated children in early MMRII trials suffered gastrointestinal issues, while another third developed respiratory problems.
• GSK’s competing vaccine, Priorix, had similarly alarming adverse event rates, including emergency room visits and chronic diseases.
Dr. David Kessler, former FDA chief, detailed the fraud in an 800-page report for a 2024 whistleblower case. He exposed Merck’s reliance on unscientific “passive surveillance” (parental self-reporting of post-vaccination reactions) to justify the problematic live-virus overfill. “This was a brand experiment that they foisted on the public,” stated Brian Hooker of the Children’s Health Defense, adding that such practices expose systemic corruption between regulators and pharmaceutical corporations.
The clash over transparency and public trust
MedPage Today’s reluctant confirmation of the mumps vaccine’s flaws sparked debate over why it’s taken decades for the truth to surface. Pro-vaccine advocates like Offit minimize concerns, citing reduced historical mumps cases (from ~150,000 in 1968 to ~1,000 in 2024) to argue “mumps has dramatically reduced… by about 99%.” But critics counter that lower incidence may reflect waning public trust in vaccines and shifting priorities, not inherent efficacy. Many of the diseases of yesteryear are less prevelant today because of improved hygiene and nutrition.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
New study links mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to increased risk of thyroid disease
A groundbreaking study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism has revealed a significant link between mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines and an increased risk of thyroid disease. The research, conducted by Taiwanese scientists using a vast medical records database, has profound implications for public health and vaccine safety monitoring.
The study analyzed data from over 2.3 million patients, with 1.16 million individuals in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts. The research team meticulously matched the two groups to ensure comparable medical histories. It spanned from Jan. 1, 2022, to Dec. 31, 2023, and utilized the TriNetX database, which includes over 116 million American patients. The findings were published online in late January.
The study found that individuals who received the said vaccines were 30 percent more likely to develop thyroid disease within a year compared to those who did not receive the vaccines. This translates to over 4,000 additional cases of thyroid disease in the vaccinated group, suggesting that millions of people globally may be at risk.
The study adds to the mounting evidence that mRNA vaccines may trigger autoimmune responses. The thyroid, a small gland in the neck responsible for regulating metabolism, is particularly vulnerable to such attacks. The immune system, in some cases, appears to turn against the body, leading to conditions like subacute thyroiditis, hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.
Dr. Jane Smith, an endocrinologist not involved in the study, commented, "The thyroid is a sensitive organ and any disruption in its function can have widespread effects on the body. This study raises important questions about the long-term impacts of mRNA vaccines."
The study also included a subgroup analysis of individuals who received the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine. Notably, this group did not show an elevated risk of thyroid disease, providing a useful control and reinforcing the specificity of the mRNA vaccine risk.
In a subgroup of 900,000 people who received only one COVID-19 shot in a year, the results were even more pronounced. These individuals had almost twice the risk of developing an underactive thyroid and a 25 percent higher risk of developing an overactive thyroid.
Smith noted, "This subgroup analysis is particularly concerning because it suggests that even a single dose of an mRNA vaccine may be enough to increase the risk of thyroid disease."
The broader public health implications
Thyroid diseases, while often manageable, can lead to serious complications if left untreated. An underactive thyroid can cause high cholesterol and heart problems, while an overactive thyroid can lead to weight loss, anxiety and an irregular heartbeat.
The implications of this study extend beyond the United States. Countries heavily reliant on mRNA vaccines, such as Israel and the United Kingdom, may also see similar trends in thyroid disease incidence. As Smith pointed out, "This is a global issue that requires a coordinated international response."
While the study provides compelling evidence, more research is needed to confirm the findings and understand the underlying mechanisms. The authors called for "larger, multi-center studies with longer follow-up periods" to further investigate the link between mRNA vaccines and thyroid disease.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Kennedy’s HHS report exposes processed food, pesticides, and vaccines as key drivers of childhood disease — will America finally listen?
For decades, parents and independent researchers have sounded the alarm about the toxic burden poisoning America’s children — only to be silenced by corporate interests, government collusion, and a media machine hellbent on protecting the status quo. Now, in a historic reversal, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has released a groundbreaking report confirming what truth-seekers have long asserted: Processed foods, environmental chemicals, and an overburdened vaccine schedule are fueling an epidemic of chronic illness in children. This report isn’t just a wake-up call — it’s a battle plan to dismantle the systems that have sacrificed children’s health for profit.
Key points:
• The HHS report identifies processed foods, pesticides (including glyphosate and atrazine), and over-vaccination as major contributors to rising rates of childhood obesity, autism, diabetes, and cancer.
• Kennedy condemned the food industry’s undue influence on public health guidelines and called for urgent action against ultra-processed foods, including suspect ingredients in infant formula.
• The report challenges the U.S. vaccine schedule, demanding further study into links between vaccines and chronic disease — a stance long censored by mainstream science.
• Farm lobby groups aggressively pressured the administration to omit pesticide criticisms, revealing the entrenched power of agrochemical giants like Bayer (owner of Monsanto).
• Next steps include clinical trials comparing whole-food diets to processed foods and enhanced safety research into pharmaceuticals and vaccines.
The food industry’s toxic grip on health
The report pulls no punches in blaming ultra-processed foods — loaded with synthetic dyes, industrial seed oils, and chemical preservatives — for deteriorating children’s health. Kennedy highlighted the revolving door between regulators and food conglomerates, noting how corporate interests have hijacked dietary guidelines. European infant formula, held to stricter safety standards, is now sought by U.S. parents distrustful of domestic brands containing questionable additives like soy oil — a product the American Soybean Association desperately defends as "heart-healthy" despite evidence linking it to inflammation.
This isn’t just about nutrition; it’s about corruption. The report cites studies connecting glyphosate, the active ingredient in Bayer’s Roundup, to cancer and neurological damage. Kennedy, who helped litigate landmark cases against Monsanto, knows firsthand how the agrochemical industry buries science to keep profiting from poison.
Vaccines under scrutiny: A long-overdue reckoning
For years, parents like Tracy, whose son Noah regressed into autism after a vaccine injury, were dismissed as "anti-vax conspiracy theorists." Now, the HHS report validates their suffering, calling for rigorous investigation into vaccine safety and the U.S. schedule, which administers more doses than most European nations. The report’s stance aligns with emerging research — suppressed for decades — showing correlations between vaccines, autoimmune disorders, and neurodevelopmental conditions.
Kennedy’s leadership marks a turning point. As he told reporters, "When you inject a child with neurotoxic aluminum or formaldehyde, you’re playing Russian roulette with their biology." The pharmaceutical industry’s stranglehold on public health is finally being challenged — not by fringe activists, but by the highest levels of government.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
DOJ investigates Andrew Cuomo for allegedly lying to Congress about COVID-19 nursing home deaths
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has opened a criminal investigation into former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo for allegedly lying to Congress about his administration’s deadly COVID-19 nursing home policies. The probe, initiated by the U.S. Attorney’s office in Washington, D.C., follows accusations that Cuomo misled lawmakers about his role in a March 2020 directive that forced nursing homes to accept COVID-positive patients—a decision linked to thousands of deaths.
Cuomo, who is now running for New York City mayor, dismissed the investigation as "lawfare and election interference" through a spokesperson, but House Republicans insist he must be held accountable for what they call a "calculated cover-up."
A deadly directive and a federal probe
At the height of the pandemic, Cuomo’s administration issued an order requiring nursing homes to admit patients discharged from hospitals, even if they were still infected with COVID-19. The policy, intended to free up hospital beds, instead fueled outbreaks in vulnerable facilities. A 2022 report by the New York state comptroller later revealed that the Cuomo administration underreported nursing home deaths by as much as 50%, obscuring the true toll of his disastrous policy.
House Republicans, led by Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY), have long accused Cuomo of lying under oath during congressional testimony about his involvement in the nursing home scandal. In October 2024, the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic referred Cuomo to the DOJ for criminal prosecution, alleging he made "multiple criminally false statements" to Congress. Now, the DOJ is acting on that referral, signaling that Cuomo could face serious legal consequences.
Cuomo’s deflection and attempted political comeback
Cuomo’s spokesman, Rich Azzopardi, dismissed the investigation as politically motivated, stating, “This is lawfare and election interference plain and simple.” He insisted that Cuomo testified "truthfully to the best of his recollection" about events from years earlier. But critics argue that Cuomo’s shifting explanations—including blaming an "unknown staffer" for the lethal nursing home order—reveal a pattern of evasion.
The timing is particularly damaging for Cuomo, who is campaigning in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor. His main rival, incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, recently had federal corruption charges against him dismissed in a move that some see as politically convenient. Cuomo, who was once a rising Democratic star, resigned as governor in 2021 amid sexual harassment allegations, but he now seeks redemption in the mayoral race. The DOJ probe, however, threatens to derail his comeback.
A history of corruption and cover-ups
Cuomo’s handling of the pandemic was marred by secrecy and mismanagement. His administration delayed releasing accurate nursing home death data, and internal reports suggest officials deliberately obscured the numbers to avoid scrutiny. House Republicans argue that Cuomo’s false statements to Congress were part of a broader effort to evade accountability.
“This wasn’t a slip-up—it was a calculated cover-up by a man seeking to shield himself from responsibility for the devastating loss of life in New York’s nursing homes,” Comer said in a statement. “Lying to Congress is a federal crime. Mr. Cuomo must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻