16504
Defending Health, Life and Liberty🇺🇸 Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger. https://t.me/NaturalNewsChat
Centuries of hidden evidence: Vaccines’ neurological toll revealed
For over 200 years, vaccines—from smallpox to modern formulations—have caused severe, documented neurological damage, often obscured by claims of public health necessity. A recent surge in scrutiny, driven by reforms in vaccine policy and resurfaced historical data, exposes a legacy of minimized risks and unaddressed suffering. As new debates over vaccine safety intensify, the question arises: How many hidden neurological injuries have been buried beneath the “safe and effective” rhetoric?
A legacy of concealed harm
Medical literature brims with accounts of vaccine-linked neurological disasters since the 1800s. Early smallpox vaccines, praised for curbing outbreaks, also triggered encephalomyelitis and paralysis in infants, with fatality rates as high as 35% in some cases. By the mid-20th century, pertussis (DPT) shots drew scrutiny after studies in the Journal of the American Medical Association and Pediatrics reported convulsions, mental retardation and death in healthy children.
In 1933, an infant died within minutes of a pertussis shot, while 1950s reports in The Lancet detailed 100+ cases of infantile myoclonic seizures. A 1977 Scottish study found that 160 DPT recipients suffered severe reactions, including mental defects—yet the CDC excluded such data from contemporary safety claims.
These findings were overshadowed by a “greater good” doctrine, as acknowledged by bacteriologist Sir Graham Wilson in 1966: Vaccines’ risks were buried to preserve trust, even when disasters recurred.
Modern eruptions of an old crisis
Today, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) compensates a fraction of injuries. In the first quarter of 2020, $57 million was disbursed, but critics argue this pales compared to unreported cases. Among verified claims, encephalopathy—often relabeled as autism—dominates after vaccines like MMR.
A pivotal 1993 British Medical Journal study found pertussis-vaccinated children were far more likely to experience “educational, behavioral, neurological, or physical dysfunction” decades post-vaccination. Meanwhile, conflicts of interest plague the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP); its recent shakeup, led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., marks a rare opportunity for transparency.
The VICP’s stringent requirements—limiting accepted injuries to rare “table injuries” like GBS—yield absurdities. As one legal analysis notes: Earlier “mental retardation” diagnoses were reclassified as autism, warping trends while excluding severe cases from redress.
The invisible casualties
Vaccine-injured families face systemic barriers. NVICP rulings favor manufacturers, who are shielded from liability under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Compensation is notoriously slow; many cases languish for years, and countless victims never file claims due to lack of awareness or proof.
The psychological toll is incalculable. A mid-1980s NBC documentary, "DPT: Vaccine Roulette," profiles children reduced to comas or irreversible disability after pertussis shots—yet mainstream media silence persists. Meanwhile, emerging pathogens like SARS-CoV-2 and their vaccines reignite fears: Pfizer’s pre-rollout documents listed 1,200 potential side effects.
Toward truth or further shadows?
The rebirth of ACIP under RFK’s leadership offers a fragile hope for reckoning with vaccines’ dark history. Yet, the cycle of obfuscation endures. From smallpox’s encephalitis to pertussis’s “post-encephalitic syndrome” and today’s autism debates, the pattern remains: injury, denial and delayed justice.
As public trust wavers, the call grows louder for unbiased research, transparent databases and policies that honor individual health over corporate and institutional imperatives. Without it, the neurological toll—a legacy of silence—will outlive us all.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Health Ranger Report: Team AGES exposes Big Pharma’s cancer scam and threats from AI
Health freedom advocates Drs. Bryan Ardis @BryanArdis, Ed Group, Henry Ealy and Jana Schmidt – collectively known as Team AGES – joined the "Health Ranger Report" to expose the corruption of the cancer industry and the dangers of centralized artificial intelligence (AI).
The experts featured in the "Cleansing the Causes of Cancer" docuseries delivered a blistering critique of Big Pharma's profit-driven medical tyranny. They also offered hope through natural healing and spiritual renewal, reiterating the urgent need for decentralized health sovereignty.
The interview opened with Adams highlighting Mark Zuckerberg's admission that censoring anti-establishment health voices like theirs was a mistake. Ealy responded cautiously, calling it a potential "groveling" tactic to appease the Trump administration rather than genuine repentance.
Schmidt echoed skepticism, comparing the Facebook founder's reversal to a Babylon Bee satire. Meanwhile, Group framed it as part of a broader "Great Awakening" where truth is finally breaking through decades of medical disinformation.
Decentralization: The antidote to medical tyranny
Ardis delivered a fiery rebuke of centralized control, emphasizing that health freedom begins with personal responsibility. He stressed that a person's health is dictated by their choices and not by Big Pharma and insurance companies.
"Your health is totally dictated by your own personal choices," Ardis said. The certified acupuncturist and nutritionist revealed he raised four children without health insurance. He saved $250,000 by relying on nutrition, detox and vaccine exemptions – a radical proof-of-concept for medical self-sufficiency.
Adams and the panel agreed that 2025 must be the year of decentralization. It involves breaking free from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandates, corrupt doctors and a system designed to keep patients sick.
Ealy proposed flipping the script, stating that doctors should be paid when patients are healthy. The founder of the Energetic Health Institute urged reframing health as a financial win, with tax incentives for wellness rather than subsidies for chronic disease.
"What would happen if we got paid based upon positive outcomes? What would happen if we got tax breaks because we weren't a tax burden because we were healthy?" Ealy said.
Schmidt stressed grassroots education, while Ardis warned of hospitals pushing staff to quit so AI "Dr. Avatars" could replace them – a dystopian future where telemedicine funnels patients into algorithm-driven pill prescriptions.
Adams spotlighted his Brighteon. ai project, a free, open-source AI trained on natural health knowledge as a counter to Pharma-controlled "retarded" models that censor truth.
AI: Humanity's savior or shackles?
The group split on AI's risks. Ealy praised decentralized AI for drafting legislation or health protocols but warned of centralized "alignment issues" where AI becomes uncontrollable, like Skynet from the "Terminator" series.
Group unveiled a darker agenda. "They want us connected to the cloud—Human 2.0, basically half-human, half-cyborg." He warned that nanotechnology is already inside every person in order to control their minds. The alternative health advocate tied this to the explosion of "turbo cancers" from weaponized pathogens in vaccines.
Schmidt rejected the term "AI" altogether, advocating for a "natural library" of uncensored knowledge. In response, Adams positioned Enoch – his Biblically named AI – as a "Noah's Ark" of forbidden healing wisdom, operable offline to evade surveillance.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Documents show Fauci met in February 2020 with University of North Carolina researcher Ralph Baric, whose "seamless ligation" technique allegedly masked evidence of lab-engineered viruses. Multiple intelligence agencies, including the FBI and Central Intelligence Agency, now assess COVID-19 likely emerged from a Wuhan lab leak.
Decades of contentious debate over gain-of-function research underscore the stakes. Paul's investigation seeks to codify stricter controls, but skeptics question whether accountability will follow transparency.
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree exploring the reason why former President Joe Biden pardoned Dr. Fauci below.
https://www.brighteon.com/7a786767-d170-4ce2-a081-ecc4f2b4ee1f
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
"The number of vaccines that our children and adolescents receive today exceed what children in most other developed nations receive and what most of us in this room received when we were children," he said.
The battle over medical exemptions isn't just about vaccines. It's about parental rights, physician autonomy and the federal government's role in healthcare. If ACIP fails to act, children with legitimate medical risks will remain collateral damage in a system that values conformity over individualized care.
Watch Tucker Carlson denouncing the ACIP's move to add the COVID-19 vaccine to the childhood immunization schedule.
https://www.brighteon.com/8c7df8fa-1cfd-4521-afa8-2281d1cf4ce7
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The issue comes amid broader accusations against the Australian Government, including:
1. Breaking a pre-election promise to hold a Royal Commission into the COVID vaccine rollout and its aftermath.
2. Instructing government lawyers to argue in court that it had no legal "duty of care" toward those harmed by the vaccines.
3. Failing to investigate over 1,000 reported vaccine-linked deaths, including 35 deaths that occurred on the day of vaccination.
4. Changing how the Australian Bureau of Statistics records excess deaths, obscuring potential links between unexpected non-COVID fatalities and vaccine rollout.
5. Quarantining QoVAX data from future use, despite legal notices warning that these records may be relevant to ongoing or future legal action.
Legal-scientific advocate Julian Gillespie issued a formal notice in April 2025 demanding a halt to the destruction of QoVAX data. He emphasized that the dataset offers a rare opportunity to compare outcomes across vaccine brands and dosages and that discarding this information may obstruct justice and hinder future vaccine policy development.
Critics have labeled the government’s actions a “cover-up,” especially in light of its simultaneous investment in new mRNA vaccine research. The timing has raised suspicions that authorities are trying to bury damaging information while promoting similar vaccine technologies.
The planned destruction of QoVAX’s biological archive, coupled with the government's refusal to analyze or publish the findings, has ignited public outrage and demands for accountability. Many view this as a betrayal of scientific integrity and public responsibility. As pressure mounts, campaigners vow to fight the move, insisting the public has a right to know the full truth about the vaccines they were encouraged—if not pressured—to receive.
The controversy shows no signs of abating, and calls for transparency, accountability, and justice are growing louder.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The NIH’s continued funding of synthetic virus research puts the agency at odds with growing scrutiny over gain-of-function studies. The White House, Congress, and intelligence agencies now concede COVID-19 likely stemmed from a lab incident involving similar work — yet taxpayer dollars still flow into projects creating novel pathogens.
Proponents argue these experiments help understand transmission, but skeptics question the necessity. “We’re building from scratch what nature didn’t, then hoping containment holds,” said one virologist familiar with the study, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the topic.
As the world recovers from COVID-19’s devastation, the NIH’s latest project underscores a recurring dilemma: balancing scientific curiosity against existential risks. With over 200 enhanced viruses now confined to a lab — but backed by federal funds — the line between preparedness and peril remains dangerously thin. Whether such research advances public health or invites catastrophe may only be clear in hindsight.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Poll: Almost half of U.S. respondents demand reevaluation of CDC vaccine schedule
In a striking shift, nearly half of U.S. respondents in an opinion poll now support reexamining the childhood vaccination schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The survey, conducted by John Zogby Strategies and commissioned by Children's Health Defense (CHD), polled 1,006 respondents from June 24 to 25. It found that 49.4 percent – 23.7 percent strongly support, 25.7 percent somehow support – are in favor of a reevaluation of the CDC's vaccine schedule. In contrast, only 29.6 percent of respondents – 15.1 percent strongly oppose, 14.5 percent somewhat oppose – prefer to keep the vaccination schedule as is.
The poll's results also revealed that support for reviewing the vaccine schedule spikes to almost 60 percent among parents of young children – a demographic directly impacted by the recommendations. Under the current schedule, children must be injected with 70 doses of 15 vaccines by age 18.
Meanwhile, 43 percent of respondents still endorse school vaccine mandates. Nevertheless, 39 percent of respondents argue public education access should remain unconditional instead of being contingent on compliance with vaccine mandates.
People want vaccine injury accountability
The opinion poll's results come amid escalating scrutiny of federal vaccine policies, particularly after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. overhauled the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) with appointees who criticize mainstream vaccine guidance. Central to the controversy is a newly formed CDC work group tasked with studying the cumulative effects of childhood vaccines.
"It is important to evaluate interaction effects between different vaccines, cumulative amounts of vaccine ingredients, and relative timing," said new ACIP Chairman Martin Kulldorff during the panel's June 25 meeting. His remarks echoed a 2013 National Academy of Medicine report urging deeper research into vaccine safety, a call left unheeded for over a decade.
Critics, including mainstream medical groups, accuse the panel of veering toward anti-vaccine ideology. The American Academy of Pediatrics blasted Kulldorff's suggestion to delay hepatitis B vaccinations as "unscientific" and "dangerous." Typically given at birth, the new ACIP chairman said the injection can be delayed "unless the mother is hepatitis B positive."
Yet CHD CEO Mary Holland argues the poll reflects a public revolt against institutional dogma. "The constant fearmongering and shaming tactics … are not only ineffective, but backfiring," she said. "This data clearly shows that the mainstream media, medical establishment and many politicians fail to hear the serious concerns of half of Americans on these vital issues."
Equally contentious is the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which shields manufacturers from liability. Nearly half of respondents – 48 percent – now support legal recourse for vaccine injuries. In contrast, just 34 percent defend the status quo.
This debate started in the 1990s, when mercury-based thimerosal first ignited autism concerns. Kennedy has long cited studies linking vaccines to neurological harm, though federal agencies and major medical journals reject those claims. Thimerosal was later removed from most childhood vaccines in 2001.
The new ACIP's review of thimerosal-preserved flu shots reignites that clash. Whether the CDC's review yields policy changes or further polarization, one truth is clear. The era of unquestioned vaccine mandates is over.
Watch this video that discusses the truth about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the CDC's vaccine schedule.
https://www.brighteon.com/4c1086dd-3d51-406d-8283-a70a608681a7
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Experts reveal how the PREP Act granting liability protection to vaccine makers is a “License to Kill”
In a recent interview, Sasha Latypova, a leading critic of U.S. health policies, has brought to light a disturbing aspect of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act). This lesser-known law grants pharmaceutical companies complete legal immunity for mRNA vaccines, effectively allowing them to manufacture and distribute these products without any liability for injuries or deaths, granting them a "license to kill."
The PREP Act, passed in 2005, was initially designed as a mechanism to buy unregulated, liability-free products from pharmaceutical companies on a small scale, primarily for national stockpiles in case of bioterrorism. However, in 2020, this legal framework was expanded to cover the entire U.S. population, leading to a significant legal and ethical crisis. Latypova, who has an MBA and extensive experience in the pharmaceutical industry, emphasizes that the emergency declaration under the PREP Act is still extended until December 2029. This 10-year emergency declaration, she argues, has turned the PREP Act into a tool for mass deception and liability evasion.
Latypova's criticism extends to the current administration, particularly Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.). She co-authored an open letter to RFK Jr. and the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Health Administration, highlighting their silence on mRNA vaccine victims and the lack of accountability. Despite RFK Jr.'s initial promise to reform health policies, Latypova and other critics are deeply disappointed by the administration's failure to address the ongoing legal and ethical issues surrounding the vaccines.
Wearables and Surveillance
Adding to the concerns, RFK Jr. has recently announced that HHS will invest heavily in promoting wearable health devices. Latypova warns that these devices, often marketed as health monitoring tools, could be used for mass surveillance and to target individuals based on their health data. She argues that the move is a blatant attempt to create new markets for tech and pharma companies, further eroding public trust in government health initiatives.
Wearable health devices can transmit biometric data to corporations and government entities, potentially exposing the most intimate aspects of an individual's health. Latypova points out that this technology can be weaponized to deny health insurance, employment, or even parental rights. She also highlights the potential for these devices to be used to enforce compliance with government health mandates, such as vaccine mandates, and to monitor individuals for infectious diseases, potentially leading to forced quarantine or other coercive measures.
The Bigger Picture
Latypova's critique is not limited to the current administration. She traces the roots of these issues back to the broader economic and political landscape. The pharmaceutical industry, facing a decline in profitability due to expired patents, has turned to the PREP Act as a tool to generate massive returns. This has led to a convergence of government and big business interests, with the FDA and HHS acting as enablers for the pharmaceutical industry.
The implications are far-reaching, extending beyond the immediate health and legal concerns. Latypova suggests that the broader agenda behind these policies may include depopulation strategies, enforced sterility, and the creation of new markets for tech and pharma companies. She emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability, calling on the public to demand that the MAHA administration live up to its promises and protect the health and rights of the American people.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Legislators weigh amendments to end college vaccine mandates for health science students
In a pivotal moment for student autonomy, Republican lawmakers and health freedom advocates are pushing amendments to a bill that seeks to end federal funding for colleges requiring mandatory COVID-19 vaccines. The legislation, introduced by Rep. Mark Messmer (R-Ind.), aims to codify President Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order, which eliminated mandated vaccines for most colleges. However, gaps in the bill have left students pursuing health sciences — such as medicine and nursing — at risk of losing enrollment or practicum access unless they comply with mandates.
Health advocacy group No College Mandates (NCM), a key player in dismantling pandemic-era mandates, warns that health science programs and partnered hospitals are exploiting provisions to enforce vaccination requirements. The group argues that urgent revisions are needed to include these programs under the law.
What the bill misses: Loopholes for health science programs
The federal government’s February 2025 executive order banned vaccine mandates for students at higher education institutions, but federal officials have interpreted the directive narrowly. According to NCM co-founder Lucia Sinatra, the order excluded health science programs at universities and partnerships with clinical sites—an exclusion perpetuated by H.R. 3044.
“There’s been no effort to clarify that all teaching programs — even those tied to hospitals — are subject to the executive order,” Sinatra told The Defender. Proponents of the bill acknowledge the gap: under current language, universities could retain vaccine mandates for students in medical, dental, or nursing programs if the policies are imposed by clinical affiliates rather than the schools themselves.
For instance, Creighton University requires health science students to meet vaccination thresholds, while Emory University’s medical school mandates shots for enrollment. Sinatra noted that instructors in these programs often avoid the same rules, worsening inequities. “These clauses disproportionately burden young adults pursuing careers in healthcare,” she said.
Advocates push to expand bill’s scope with key adjustments
NCM has inundated lawmakers with requests to redefine “higher education” in H.R. 3044 to include clinical programs and residency sites. Their letter argues that federal aid must be contingent on eliminating mandates across university partnerships, as well as within schools themselves.
“The proposed law’s failure to close these loopholes makes it toothless,” stated NCM strategist Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., citing a “patchwork of exemptions that created two classes of students.” Current legislation, while ending mandates at 15 remaining holdout schools, would still allow health science students to face requirements when completing required internships or practicums.
Sinatra praised Messmer’s bill as a “good start” but emphasized that federal language must “state explicitly” that vaccine mandates for healthcare students invalidate a university’s federal funding eligibility. “Taxpayers shouldn’t subsidize freedom-stealing policies,” she said.
The gradual unraveling of mandates—and their lingering legacy
Vaccine mandates for college students peaked in 2021, with over 400 institutions enforcing them. By 2025, that number dropped to 17—but according to NCM, nearly all 44 medical schools in the United States still impose shot requirements on students.
Trump’s executive order brought relief to many, but uneven enforcement pushed NCM to pivot its efforts. The group’s 2025 Substack post recounts how academic associations and hospital systems used legal ambiguity to maintain mandates for healthcare-specific programs, even as broader vaccine requirements dissolved.
Federal agencies, NCM argues, rely on a “sentence or two” in preexisting statutory definitions—a technicality the group insists leaves loopholes for monitoring compliance.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A Nature study later confirmed supplementation reduced COVID deaths by 33%, validating the very remedies governments censored. Now, as courts force admissions about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine’s efficacy, vitamin D stands vindicated as perhaps the most powerful low-cost defense against COVID-19.
Rejecting fear, embracing truth
The pandemic exposed a sad reality: Corporate medicine would rather enforce dependency than empower individuals with affordable, natural solutions. Vitamin D’s success, bolstered by decades of peer-reviewed science, proves immunity cannot be bottled or patented. From Dr. Urso’s clinical breakthroughs to Harvard’s telomere research, the evidence is unambiguous: Sunlight, nutrition, and human biology form an irreplaceable foundation for health.
As new variants emerge, the public must reject fear-based controls and demand accountability for those who suppressed lifesaving science. Vitamin D’s triumph is not just medical — it is ideological, proving that nature, not pharma cartels, holds the key to resilience.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A controversial influence in global health
With the Gates Foundation contributing $7.7 billion to Gavi over 25 years, Gates acknowledged to the Financial Times that it would be “a strange world” if his foundation outspent nations on global health. Still, skepticism remains. Dr. Meryl Nass suggested past U.S. aid to Gavi and similar entities served more to expand influence than improve health: “Gavi … launders [funds] to favored pharmaceutical companies … to achieve global influence.”
Gavi estimates U.S. and U.K. cuts could leave 37.9 million children unvaccinated, potentially causing 1.2 million additional deaths. Critics dismiss such projections as fearmongering. Bruner argued Gavi must face scrutiny rather than “emotional appeals to justify billions in unchecked spending.”
As Gavi scrambles to secure $9 billion in new pledges, its future hinges on balancing donor confidence with calls for transparency. With Western governments retreating, private philanthropists like Gates are filling the gap—raising concerns over corporate influence in global health policy. The debate over vaccines, aid, and accountability shows no signs of resolution, leaving millions of children’s fates hanging in the balance.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Broader context: Contamination and batch variability
The study raises additional concerns that early, highly contaminated vaccine batches may have contributed to conception declines. Previous analyses—including a 2023 Danish study—found that some Pfizer-BioNTech EU batches acted like placebos, while others triggered disproportionate adverse events.
Similar inconsistencies were identified in Sweden and the Czech Republic, suggesting quality control failures. Dr. Perro and others now call for "immediate cessation and withdrawal of mRNA technology" pending independent safety reviews.
While health authorities maintain COVID-19 vaccines are safe for pregnancy, mounting data—from miscarriage spikes to falling conception rates—suggests otherwise. With fertility declines persisting years post-vaccination, researchers stress that unexplained reproductive risks cannot be dismissed.
As Hooker warned, "Any decrease in fertility… lies at the heart of the fact that this vaccine technology should have never been rolled out to the public in the first place." The debate, far from settled, underscores a pressing need for unbiased, long-term studies—and accountability for decisions affecting generations to come.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Health Minister Butler’s plea for wider uptake faces headwinds. Critics point to mixed messaging—once touted as 100% protective, vaccines now confront evolving variants and waning public trust. Some experts warned early about immune imprinting and the difficulty of vaccinating against respiratory viruses, a stance bolstered by peer-reviewed studies, including those co-authored by Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Australia’s latest COVID wave highlights enduring tensions between public health advocacy and public fatigue. While officials push boosters to combat NB.1.8.1, low uptake signals deeper skepticism—fueled by inconsistent messaging, outdated predictions, and a virus that defies easy solutions.
As the world moves beyond peak pandemic panic, Australia faces a balancing act: encouraging protection without inflating fear. With experts divided and public patience thinning, the next chapter in COVID policy may hinge on transparency—and whether leaders can rebuild trust eroded by years of shifting strategies.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
A 2023 study of 65 encephalitis patients linked AstraZeneca’s vaccine to over a third of cases, though most recovered fully. The precise trigger remains unknown, highlighting gaps in understanding how vaccines interact with individual immune systems.
France and other European nations restricted AstraZeneca’s vaccine in early 2021 after reports of rare blood clots, known as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS). At least 81 UK deaths were tied to the complication, prompting age-based rollback policies. Despite these risks, the vaccine is credited with saving 6 million lives globally during the pandemic.
Meanwhile, compensation for vaccine injuries remains contentious. In the UK, only those deemed 60% disabled — such as losing a limb or vision — qualify for a £120,000 payout under a widely criticized government scheme.
Emerging concerns: Post-vaccination syndrome
The French case coincides with rising scrutiny of long-term post-vaccine symptoms, particularly following mRNA vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna. Researchers report conditions such as brain fog, tinnitus, and immune dysfunction under the umbrella of "post-vaccination syndrome," though data remains preliminary.
While severe reactions like meningoencephalitis are statistically rare, this case underscores the imperative for rigorous, long-term surveillance of vaccine side effects. As global health systems balance pandemic-era urgency with individualized risk assessments, transparency and adaptive policies will be critical to maintaining public trust—especially as alternative treatments gain traction among wary populations.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
The truth is that this scandal is far from over. With studies still underway to assess long-term cardiac damage and vaccine-injured patients struggling to get recognition—let alone compensation—from the government’s broken compensation system, the full consequences of this medical experiment may not be known for years.
The FDA’s belated label changes confirm what independent researchers and courageous doctors have warned about for years: COVID-19 vaccines carry serious, potentially life-altering risks for young people. While regulators and pharmaceutical giants hope this minor concession will quiet critics, the American people deserve more than half-truths and bureaucratic foot-dragging. They deserve full transparency, real informed consent, and accountability for those who suppressed critical safety data. Until then, this fight is far from over.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Cancer industry exposed: Healing without poison
The conversation pivoted to the "Cleansing the Causes of Cancer" docuseries, where the experts dismantle oncology's three pillars of fraud: Chemotherapy (poison), radiation (burning) and surgery (mutilation). Ealy called the system "demonic," citing his mother's ordeal with an oncologist who "lied through his teeth" about experimental treatments.
Ardis @BryanArdis shared a bombshell: People are born with cancer cells and their immune system is designed to manage them. He spotlighted a nurse who reversed stage IV metastatic cancer naturally after her hospital gave her six months to live.
Group reduced disease to "toxic external and internal environments," urging liver detox, parasite cleanses and spiritual realignment with God's design. The panel unanimously tied physical health to spiritual health.
Ealy declared, "The No. 1 medicine is falling in love with God again," while Schmidt emphasized forgiveness for past medical mistakes, like vaccinating children. Adams condemned the transhumanist assault on divine biology, mocking mastectomy as prevention.
The experts closed with a call to action:
• Reject fear: Cancer screenings are profit traps. The body self-heals with clean air, water and nutrition.
• Use open-source AI: Local farms and cash-paid holistic care to bypass Pharma cartels.
• Fight back: Ealy teased a peer-reviewed paper demanding mRNA vaccine suspensions based on the 1976 swine flu precedent.
As governments collapse and truth surges, Adams urged viewers to "make yourself healthy again"—a rebellion against the sick-care system.
Watch the full interview between Team AGES and the Health Ranger Mike Adams below.
https://www.brighteon.com/0c6d4ba0-7c78-4d6a-bdeb-5eaea73e2ede
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA’s long-delayed myocarditis warning exposes vaccine safety failures
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has ordered Pfizer and Moderna to update their Wuhan corona virus (COVID-19) vaccine labels with stronger warnings about heart inflammation risks, particularly in young males.
The June 25 announcement follows mounting evidence linking mRNA vaccines to myocarditis and pericarditis, conditions involving dangerous swelling of the heart muscle and surrounding tissue. Boys and men aged 12 to 24 remain the most vulnerable, with at least 27 cases per million doses reported in the 2023-2024 vaccination period.
The FDA now admits that long-term effects of these injuries remain unknown, raising urgent questions about transparency and accountability in the vaccine rollout. For years, federal health agencies downplayed concerns about vaccine-related heart complications, dismissing them as "rare" and "mild."
But newly released data from a government-funded study confirms what independent researchers and parents have warned. Heart abnormalities persist for months in many patients, and nearly half suffer moderate to severe damage.
The FDA's updated warning is now mandatory for both Comirnaty (Pfizer) and Spikevax (Moderna). It marks a stark reversal from earlier assurances that side effects were temporary and insignificant.
The highest incidence of myocarditis occurs in males aged 16 to 25, with 38 cases per million doses – far exceeding initial estimates. MRI scans reveal lingering heart damage in many patients, contradicting claims by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that most cases resolve quickly.
The regulator insists long-term risks are still being studied. But critics argue the agency acted too slowly, leaving young Americans in the dark about potential dangers.
Why the warnings were delayed
In April, the FDA sent letters to both drugmakers asking them to update and expand the warnings to add more detail about the problem and to cover a larger group of patients. Its decision follows pressure from lawmakers and medical whistleblowers who accused health officials of suppressing data. The updated labels were finalized just hours before a Senate hearing on how federal agencies allegedly concealed vaccine injuries.
Notably, Dr. Peter Marks – the FDA's former top vaccine regulator – departed that same month amid internal debates over how to present the risks. The timing suggests bureaucratic resistance delayed critical safety updates, a pattern seen throughout the pandemic.
While the FDA now acknowledges myocarditis risks, the CDC maintains its stance that complications are rare and less severe than those caused by COVID-19 itself. This contradiction fuels skepticism about government health guidance. Independent studies, however, show vaccine-induced myocarditis can lead to chronic heart issues, challenging the CDC's optimistic assessments.
Pfizer and Moderna must conduct long-term studies on heart risks, but results could take years. With trust in public health institutions eroding, the FDA's belated transparency may be too little, too late for families already affected.
Watch this segment from "Get Facts-inated" with Del Bigtree that discusses whether vaccine-induced myocarditis is worse than the myocarditis from contracting COVID-19.
https://www.brighteon.com/8bc2b683-e49b-42a8-8052-858e7652ea88
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Sen. Rand Paul: Fauci may be subpoenaed to testify over his role in COVID-19
U.S. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has announced that infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci may be subpoenaed to testify under oath regarding his role in the origins of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
The senator made the announcement in a series of posts Monday, June 30, on X. "The Senate is now gearing up to subpoena Fauci to testify under oath," Paul wrote. "The American people deserve complete transparency."
Paul, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, also posted that he is working with Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel to investigate what he calls a "vast COVID-19 coverup." Included in the probe were allegations that Fauci lied under oath about risky virus experiments.
The investigation hinges on funding records showing the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) supported gain-of-function research at China's Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Gain-of-function research was banned in the U.S. from 2014 to 2017 due to safety concerns. Fauci meanwhile served as NIAID director from 1984 until his retirement in 2022.
In January, Paul subpoenaed 14 federal agencies – including the FBI and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) seeking transparency on COVID-19’s origins. He has accused Fauci of perjury in Senate hearings, citing conflicting testimony on whether NIAID-funded experiments at the WIV qualified as gain-of-function.
Why Fauci's controversial pardon may not be enough
According to legal experts, Fauci isn't off the hook just yet even though he received a controversial preemptive pardon early this year. The pardon, given by former President Joe Biden during the last hours of his term, shields the former NIAID director from federal prosecution for actions between 2014 and 2024.
But attorney Rick Jaffe pointed out that Fauci's pardon doesn't block congressional testimony or state-level charges. "His pardon [also] cannot prevent civil lawsuits, congressional contempt findings or administrative actions like pension forfeiture," he added. True enough, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has signaled state-level inquiries could proceed.
Meanwhile, former U.S. Senate investigator Paul Thacker warned Fauci's history of alleged obfuscation heightens legal risks. One such instance involved the infectious disease expert claiming over 100 times in a January 2024 House interview that he didn't recall key pandemic decisions.
"If Fauci is placed under oath and fails to admit that his testimony was misleading, he can be prosecuted," Thacker told The Defender. "Fauci's main problem is that he has a history of lying and getting away with it, so he will likely continue to lie."
Independent scientist Richard Ebright welcomed congressional scrutiny, endorsing Paul's proposed Risky Research Review Act to impose stricter oversight. The NIH has since halted Fauci-established programs funding such research, but Ebright – a longtime critic of gain-of-function research – argues only legislation can prevent future reversals. "Fauci willfully violated federal policies … and caused a pandemic that killed 20+ million," he said in an email.
Echoing calls for accountability, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggested a "truth commission" modeled after post-apartheid South Africa as a way to bypass Biden's pardon. "Anybody who comes and volunteers to testify truthfully is then given immunity from prosecution," he told Tucker Carlson in an interview Monday, July 30. "People who are called and don't take that deal and perjure themselves, they then can be prosecuted criminally."
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Children DENIED medical exemptions as rigid vaccine policies override doctors’ orders
Children with serious medical conditions are being denied federally protected disability accommodations, with some suffering severe harm after being forced to receive vaccines against their doctors' advice.
This troubling trend stems from rigid interpretations of federal immunization guidelines, as revealed when Children's Health Defense (CHD) confronted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The health freedom group demanded urgent reforms to protect vulnerable students.
During the June 25 meeting of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), CHD General Counsel Kim Mack Rosenberg warned that ACIP's 2014 guidelines are being weaponized by schools and state officials to override physicians' professional judgments.
The consequences of weaponizing these guidelines, which narrowly define medical exemptions, are dire. Children with legitimate health risks are being coerced into vaccination or barred from education entirely.
Rosenberg argued that physicians who write exemptions outside the CDC's narrow criteria face professional retaliation, including threats to their medical licenses. Meanwhile, schools routinely dismiss medical documentation, forcing parents into an impossible choice – risk their child’s health or forfeit their education.
One such case involves Sarah Doe, a New York teenager with multiple severe conditions including autoimmune hypersensitivity and a rare bleeding disorder. Seven doctors agreed she should not receive the hepatitis B vaccine, yet her school district refuses to grant an exemption because her conditions aren’t explicitly listed in ACIP’s tables.
Even a walk-in clinic, recognizing the danger, refused to vaccinate her. But without an exemption, Sarah remains locked out of school – a clear violation of federal disability protections.
Current ACIP guidelines restrict medical exemptions to a limited set of conditions, such as severe allergic reactions or immunodeficiency. However, these rules fail to account for complex individual health circumstances, leaving doctors and families entangled in bureaucratic red tape.
ACIP's 2014 document includes a partial list of contraindications (conditions making vaccination unsafe) and precautions (situations requiring extra caution). For instance, immunocompromised patients are advised against the dengue vaccine, and those with prior anaphylaxis must proceed carefully.
Yet the guidelines dismiss certain reactions – such as seizures after the DTaP shot – as "incorrectly perceived" risks, despite evidence that some children may need exemptions. Worse, they delegate critical medical decisions to state and school officials rather than treating physicians.
Bureaucrats or doctors – who should control vaccine exemptions?
Rosenberg urged ACIP to clarify three key points:
• The CDC does not have authority to dictate individual medical decisions.
• The guidelines are not exhaustive, as many valid exemptions exist beyond their limited tables.
• Only doctors, using clinical judgment and patient history, should determine exemptions.
She warned that without these changes, more children will be harmed by inflexible policies that prioritize bureaucratic compliance over patient safety. This debate unfolds amid a broader shakeup at ACIP.
Recently, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. replaced all 17 committee members, citing concerns over conflicts of interest. The new panel led by epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff has pledged to reexamine long-standing vaccine policies, including the childhood immunization schedule.
Critics fear this could undermine public trust, but supporters argue it's a necessary correction after years of one-size-fits-all mandates. Kulldorff acknowledged the need to rebuild confidence, referencing "inflated promises" about Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Insidious Australian Government in full PANIC MODE destroying all evidence of the Covid CLOT SHOTS including statistics, records and clinical data
The Australian Government is under intense scrutiny following revelations that it plans to destroy vital clinical data and biological samples from the publicly funded QoVAX study, which examined the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.
As reported by The Exposé, this move has sparked widespread concern over a potential cover-up, especially in light of the government's broader pattern of avoiding accountability for vaccine-related harms. Critics argue that the destruction of such irreplaceable evidence would hinder scientific transparency and obstruct justice for those seeking answers.
• Broken Promises and Legal Evasion: The Australian Government has failed to deliver on its promise to launch a Royal Commission into COVID-19 vaccine harms and has argued in court that it holds no duty of care toward individuals injured by the vaccines.
• Suppression of Adverse Data: Authorities have neglected to fully investigate over 1,000 reported vaccine-linked deaths, including 35 on the day of injection, and altered statistical methods to obscure a rise in non-COVID excess deaths post-vaccine rollout.
• Destruction of Critical Evidence: The government is moving to destroy biospecimens and archive data from the QoVAX study—an extensive, taxpayer-funded trial tracking vaccine safety in over 10,000 Queenslanders—despite legal warnings to preserve the materials.
• Allegations of a Cover-Up: Critics argue that the decision to shut down and erase QoVAX findings amid growing global scrutiny of mRNA vaccine safety reflects a coordinated effort to conceal potential harms and avoid accountability.
Government Under Fire: Australia Moves to Destroy Key COVID Vaccine Study Data Amid Mounting Accusations of Concealment
The Australian Government is facing growing criticism for its handling of COVID-19 vaccine safety data, with recent revelations highlighting what many see as a systematic effort to suppress evidence of potential vaccine-related harms.
At the heart of the controversy is the planned destruction of irreplaceable clinical data and biological samples from the QoVAX Study—a large-scale, publicly funded research initiative involving over 10,000 participants in Queensland. The study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of various COVID-19 vaccines across a genetically diverse population.
Established in 2022 by Queensland’s top universities—University of Queensland, Griffith University, and James Cook University—the QoVAX SET (Safety and Efficacy Trial) was a significant attempt to gather real-world data on vaccine responses.
However, in June 2023, Metro North Health abruptly terminated the study, withdrawing funding without explanation. In March 2025, participants were informed that all biospecimens would be destroyed and the data archived with no access allowed for future research purposes.
This decision has alarmed scientists, legal advocates, and public health campaigners, who argue that the data and samples are of global importance. The materials contain valuable insights into vaccine effectiveness, side effects, and even synthetic DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines—a concern validated by several prestigious labs, including the FDA’s own. Critics argue that the destruction of such evidence undermines scientific transparency and public trust.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
INSIDIOUS NIH just funded and barcoded TWO HUNDRED brand new gain-of-function COVID viruses they can release soon for the next MASSIVE PLANDEMIC
Trump needs to put a halt to all this biological warfare “research” that will only wind up infecting billions of innocent civilians. NIH should be SHUT DOWN for fraud, waste and corruption until ethical scientists can be vetted and put in place for actual helpful research. Here’s what’s going on right now and being funded at NIH:
1. NIH-Funded Creation of Synthetic Viruses
◦ Researchers created 200+ novel "barcoded" SARS-CoV-2 viruses in the lab using reverse genetics, funded by NIH grants (R01AI169022, U01AI151810). These constructs do not exist in nature and were engineered for tracking in transmission studies.
2. Gain-of-Function Concerns
◦ All constructs were modified with the D614G spike mutation, known to enhance transmissibility and viral replication — a hallmark of gain-of-function research. This raises alarms given the lab-leak theory surrounding COVID-19’s origins.
3. Contradictions in Oversight
◦ The work was conducted in BSL-3 labs under NIH protocols, yet parallels risky pre-pandemic research (e.g., WIV1 chimeras) that bypassed P3CO review. Dr. Fauci’s prior denial of funding gain-of-function is contradicted by such projects.
4. Pandemic Risk Amid Accountability Failures
◦ Despite global scrutiny of lab-engineered pathogens post-COVID, taxpayer dollars continue funding synthetic virus batches — now with trackable barcodes. Critics argue this prioritizes academic curiosity over biosafety and pandemic prevention.
NIH-funded scientists create over 200 lab-made, "barcoded" COVID viruses with enhanced transmissibility
In a controversial move, U.S. government-funded researchers have engineered more than 200 synthetic, lab-made versions of SARS-CoV-2 — each modified for heightened transmissibility — using advanced genetic techniques. The work, detailed in a peer-reviewed Science Advances study published January 15, 2025, was conducted at Washington University School of Medicine under multiple National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants. The revelation comes as U.S. intelligence agencies and lawmakers increasingly acknowledge that COVID-19 likely originated from a lab-related incident involving high-risk pathogen research. Critics warn such experiments could inadvertently trigger another pandemic.
The study confirms researchers used a reverse genetics system to construct the viruses, assembling genetic material not found in nature. Each pathogen was tagged with a unique six-nucleotide "barcode," allowing scientists to track individual strains during animal experiments. According to the paper, the team pooled “>200 barcoded SARS-CoV-2 viruses” based on equal infectious viral titers.
Notably, these synthetic constructs were created under NIH-funded biosafety level-3 (BSL-3) containment protocols — a mid-tier safeguard for dangerous pathogens. The authors emphasized that none of the lab-made viruses mirror circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages, raising ethical concerns about the justification for their creation.
All 200+ lab-made viruses were deliberately modified to include the D614G spike mutation — a change linked to increased viral transmissibility in humans. The study notes: “We also introduced a D614G mutation in the Spike gene of SARS-CoV-2.”
Virological research has long classified D614G as a gain-of-function trait, meaning it enhances viral replication and infectivity. Prior studies found this mutation boosts replication in human lung cells and airway tissues, making viruses more efficient at infecting hosts. Critics argue that engineering pathogens with such traits — especially after the pandemic — risks repeating past mistakes.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Conclusion
In summary, the PREP Act and the push for wearable health devices are part of a larger system that prioritizes corporate profits and government control over public health and individual rights. Sasha Latypova's insights highlight the urgent need for critical thinking and action to ensure that health policies are transparent, ethical, and truly in the best interest of the public. The public's role in demanding accountability and transparency cannot be overstated in this ongoing battle for health freedom.
Watch the full episode of the "Health Ranger Report" with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and Sasha Latypova as they expose the destructive lies of the FDA, HHS, ACIP, Big Pharma and the mass poisoning agenda.
https://www.brighteon.com/ba648c6f-6148-4615-9d2c-49a484b1a6d8
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Public action urged as deadline looms
NCM is mobilizing students, faculty and families to press lawmakers ahead of congressional votes on H.R. 3044. Its website features a template letter urging reps to incorporate the amendments, while Sinatra stresses that lobbying in lawmakers’ home districts amplifies impact.
“This isn’t just about choices today — it’s about protecting the next generation of doctors,” she said. “If we don’t act now, another pandemic could bring back these tactics without meaningful checks.”
A crossroads for student rights and institutional oversight
As the debate over H.R. 3044 intensifies, the stakes are framed beyond health science students. NCM’s push to redefine its scope reflects broader tensions about federal authority, educational rights and who gets to define “essential” rules for public money. With the bill’s final draft pending, lawmakers’ decisions will determine whether the law finally dismantles all remnants of coercive vaccination policies — or allows exemptions to persist under legal loopholes.
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
FDA’s FLAWED approval process: How hundreds of unsafe and ineffective drugs slip through
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved hundreds of drugs without conclusive proof they work. In many cases, these drugs approved by the regulator even caused harm.
This discovery was the result of a two-year investigation by medical journalists Jeanne Lenzer and Shannon Brownlee, published by The Lever on June 5. The findings reveal that the FDA routinely ignores its own scientific standards, putting millions of patients at risk.
The report by Lenzer and Brownlee also expose a system where fast-tracking drugs for approval outweighs rigorous safety checks. This shift was accelerated by industry lobbying and political pressure ever since the AIDS crisis of the 1980s.
Between 2013 and 2022, 73 percent of newly approved drugs failed to meet all four of the FDA's foundational benchmarks for proving effectiveness – control-group testing, replication in multiple trials, blinding of participants and reliance on clinical endpoints instead of surrogates. Shockingly, 40 drugs met none of these criteria.
Among cancer drugs, only three out of 123 met all four standards. Instead, many were greenlit based on tumor-shrinkage data (a surrogate marker) rather than evidence they extended lives.
Take Copiktra, approved in 2018. Later post-market studies revealed patients died 11 months earlier than those on alternative treatments. Despite this red flag, the FDA took six years to issue warnings.
Another example is the bladder drug Elmiron. It was first approved in 1996 with "close to zero" efficacy data and remained on the market for 18 years. However, confirmatory studies later proved it was no better than placebo – and those who took it suffered blindness, colitis and even death.
FDA's deadly trade-off: Speedy drug approvals over safety
This decline in scrutiny traces back to the 1990s, when AIDS activists and pharmaceutical companies pressured the FDA to expedite approvals. What began as emergency measures for life-saving drugs morphed into permanent policy with the 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act, which tied FDA funding to industry fees.
Since then, companies have exploited "accelerated pathways," often skipping follow-up trials altogether. However, the consequences are staggering. An estimated 128,000 Americans die annually from properly prescribed medications – more than all illegal drug deaths combined.
Yet doctors remain unaware. A 2016 JAMA study found only six percent understood that FDA approval doesn't guarantee clinically meaningful benefits.
"We need an agency that's independent from the industry it regulates," argues Yale University regulatory expert and physician Reshma Ramachandran. "Without that, we might as well go back to the days of snake oil and patent medicines."
The investigation's most damning revelation? The agency's fear of backlash over unsafe approvals (Type I errors) far outweighs its concern for lives lost to delayed treatments (Type II errors).
For Laura MacMillan, blinded by Elmiron after 20 years of use, the cost is irreparable. "I can't drive anymore,” she says. MacMillan stopped working 13 years ago due to her vision problems, but she is nevertheless luckier than others who suffered serious injuries from or were killed by the drug.
Like thousands of others, she trusted a system that prioritized speed over science – and paid the price. With the FDA's credibility eroding, the question remains: How many more will suffer before standards are restored?
Watch this video explaining why the FDA is a scam.
https://www.brighteon.com/ba17eb11-85fc-4e8e-ab16-68717b153277
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Sunshine vitamin censorship: How health authorities suppressed vitamin D’s life-saving benefits during COVID
In one of the most egregious public health betrayals in modern history, health authorities deliberately discouraged sunlight exposure — nature’s most potent source of immune-boosting vitamin D — while enforcing isolation policies that kept millions indoors during COVID-19. Now, shocking new research confirms what natural health advocates warned from the beginning: Vitamin D supplementation was 60% effective against COVID-19 incidence and 70% effective in preventing severe cases requiring ICU care, far surpassing the risk-laden pharmaceutical "solutions" pushed by captured institutions.
Dr. Richard Urso, a vocal advocate for natural immunity, discovered vitamin D’s remarkable healing properties years before the pandemic. “Vitamin D could stop modern disease,” he proclaimed, detailing how supplementation resolved allergies, skin tags, and other ailments. Yet instead of promoting this safe, inexpensive remedy, governments and media conglomerates doubled down on lockdowns, masks, and experimental injections — policies that directly worsened vitamin D deficiencies. A recent Italian meta-analysis of 16 studies involving 1.26 million participants exposes the truth: Vitamin D was systematically suppressed because it threatened Big Pharma’s profit-driven disease model.
The science they ignored
Long before COVID-19, researchers understood vitamin D’s critical role in immune function. Studies from Tehran University and Boston University found patients with sufficient vitamin D levels were 51.5% less likely to die from COVID-19. A University of Chicago study linked deficiency to 60% higher infection rates, while University of East Anglia data revealed case rates dropped with rising vitamin D levels. Despite this, public health agencies actively dismissed the evidence, even lying outright, as when UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock falsely claimed trials showed vitamin D had “no impact” against COVID.
The consequences were catastrophic. By forcing populations indoors, lockdowns starved the public of sunlight, accelerating deficiency rates already affecting 40% of U.S. adults. Meanwhile, mask mandates further blocked UV exposure, making it nearly impossible for many to maintain protective vitamin D levels. Experts like Dr. Pierre Kory argue this was no accident: “Big Pharma is terrified of vitamin D because it threatens the disease model.” Instead of harnessing nature’s defenses, institutions prioritized patented drugs and vaccines despite their limited effectiveness and known risks.
Sunlight as medicine
Human biology evolved to synthesize vitamin D through sunlight, a fact health authorities deliberately obscured. Harvard-affiliated endocrinologist Dr. JoAnn Manson’s research demonstrates how vitamin D slows cellular aging by preserving telomeres, the protective caps on chromosomes. Mass General Brigham’s VITAL trial confirmed that supplementation prevents three years of biological aging in a finding corporate media downplayed.
Similarly, UCHealth neurologist Dr. Enrique Alvarez notes vitamin D’s profound impact on autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis. Finnish studies reveal deficiency in childhood doubles cardiovascular risks later in life, while University of Colorado researchers acknowledge vitamin D’s indispensable role in immune training. Yet the establishment—obsessed with patentable “solutions” — buried these truths under layers of bureaucracy and propaganda.
A deliberate war on natural immunity
The suppression of vitamin D fits a broader pattern of institutional hostility toward natural health. Natural News had warned early in the pandemic that sunlight deprivation would cripple immunity, but legacy media vilified such claims as “misinformation.” Simultaneously, outlets demonized outdoor activities while promoting chemtrail conspiracy theories and toxic sunscreens that block 99% of vitamin D synthesis.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
WHITE SUPREMACIST BILL GATES invading poor countries with TOXIC JABS now BIGGEST DONOR for new depopulation-driven dirty “Vaccine Alliance”
A very popular, tall white billionaire who preaches at his TED talks about reducing the world’s population by several billion people by “doing a really great job with vaccines” is now funding more toxic jabs to infiltrate Africa and reduce those nations’ population using his genocidal “medicine” that causes infertility, heart attacks, strokes and spontaneous miscarriage.
1 RFK Jr.’s Critique of Gavi: U.S. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. denounced Gavi’s lack of focus on vaccine safety, citing concerns like COVID-19 shots for pregnant women and the DTP vaccine. The U.S. will cease funding until Gavi addresses transparency and scientific scrutiny.
2 Global Funding Shifts: The U.S. and U.K. (historically major donors) are reducing or eliminating Gavi funding, potentially leaving the Gates Foundation as its top donor. The EU, Canada, and others pledged new funds, but gaps remain — Gavi warns cuts could lead to millions of unvaccinated children and over a million preventable deaths.
3 Allegations of Political Influence: Critics like Seamus Bruner and Dr. Meryl Nass accuse Gavi and USAID of prioritizing political and pharmaceutical interests over independent science, with funding serving as a tool for global control rather than equitable health outcomes.
Gates pledges $1.6 billion to Gavi amid U.S. funding cuts, critics question motives
The insidious, toxic vaccine promoting Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced a $1.6 billion pledge Tuesday to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, as the U.S. and U.K. slash financial support for the global immunization program. The move comes amid fierce debate over Gavi’s transparency, vaccine safety, and Gates’ growing influence in global health. Critics allege the funding reinforces Gates’ sway over vaccine distribution, while proponents warn that donor cuts could lead to millions of unvaccinated children and preventable deaths.
Gavi, a public-private partnership founded in 2000 with Gates Foundation backing, aims to vaccinate children in low-income nations against diseases like pneumonia and diarrhea, but the real agenda is quite insidious, per Gates TED talks.
Bill Gates warned in a statement that “For the first time in decades, the number of kids dying around the world will likely go up this year instead of down because of massive cuts to foreign aid.” Yet critics argue his latest pledge is less about public health and more about consolidating power. Seamus Bruner, author of Controligarchs, told The Defender, “The Gates Foundation’s $1.6 billion pledge … looks less like charity and more like a much-needed cash infusion to prop up this public-private pro-vax hybrid.”
At Gavi’s Brussels fundraising summit, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a video message announcing the U.S. withdrawal of financial support, demanding greater accountability. “In its zeal to promote universal vaccination, [Gavi] has neglected the key issue of vaccine safety,” Kennedy said, criticizing Gavi for dismissing safety concerns as “a public relations problem.”
Kennedy specifically cited Gavi’s promotion of COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women and DTP (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis) vaccines, alleging the alliance ignored inconvenient science. Gavi defended its practices, stating scientific evidence supports DTP immunization.
The Biden administration had initially pledged billions to Gavi, but Trump’s proposed 2025 budget would eliminate funding entirely. Meanwhile, Canada and the EU announced new contributions — 491.5million and 301.7 million, respectively — but analysts warn they won’t offset the U.S. and U.K. shortfalls.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
CLOT SHOT MISCARRIAGES: Early in the PLANDEMIC genocidal Covid jabs caused shocking numbers of miscarriages and stillbirths per study of 1.3 million
Truth news was right all along. The Covid jabs were all about depopulation and now the science leads to the truth also. In a peer-reviewed study examining 1.3 million women, researchers found that COVID-19 vaccinated women experienced a "substantially lower" rate of successful conception compared to unvaccinated women. Published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, the analysis adds to growing global concerns about potential reproductive risks from mRNA vaccines.
• Fertility Decline Linked to Vaccination: Peer-reviewed studies, including one analyzing 1.3 million women in the Czech Republic, found that vaccinated women had a "substantially lower" rate of successful conceptions compared to unvaccinated women, with no convergence in fertility rates over time—suggesting potential long-term harm.
• Increased Miscarriages and Stillbirths: Multiple studies, including data from VAERS and research in Germany/Sweden, show a strong correlation between COVID-19 vaccine rollouts and spikes in miscarriages, stillbirths, and sudden drops in fertility rates—unexplained by COVID-19 infections or economic factors.
• Lack of Precautionary Testing: Experts like Dr. Michelle Perro and Dr. Brian Hooker criticize the rushed deployment of mRNA vaccines without adequate long-term safety data, particularly for pregnant women and women of childbearing age, calling it a "disastrous" public health failure.
• Batch Contamination Concerns: Early vaccine batches were disproportionately tied to severe adverse events, with some studies suggesting placebo/non-placebo discrepancies (e.g., EU Pfizer batches) and potential toxic effects on reproductive health, warranting urgent further investigation.
Study links COVID Vaccines to lower pregnancy success rates, fueling debate over reproductive risks and dirty vaccines that must be recalled at once
Multiple government reports and medical journals—including the New England Journal of Medicine—have documented higher miscarriage and stillbirth rates among vaccinated pregnant women. Amid denials from health authorities, experts warn that these findings demand urgent investigation into long-term fertility effects.
Analyzing Czech Republic birth data from January 2021 to December 2023, researchers observed that by June 2021—six months after vaccine rollout—successful conceptions plummeted among vaccinated women. While unvaccinated women saw a rebound in successful pregnancies by mid-2021, rates remained 1.5 times higher than those in vaccinated women through 2022 and beyond.
Dr. Karl Jablonowski, a senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense (CHD), called the divergence "troubling," noting that if vaccines only caused short-term effects, fertility rates "would converge over time, and they don’t."
Critics argue the vaccines were prematurely rolled out without thorough reproductive safety data. "This preliminary analysis shows that much more information is needed to understand both short- and long-term implications," said Dr. Brian Hooker, CHD’s chief scientific officer.
Pediatrician Dr. Michelle Perro described the study as "deeply concerning," adding that releasing novel medical technologies without comprehensive testing "has been shown to be disastrous towards the health of future generations."
The study noted possible confounding factors, such as women avoiding vaccination while planning pregnancy. Yet researchers emphasized that Czech health authorities actively urged pregnant women to get vaccinated, potentially minimizing selection bias.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
COVID SEQUEL FAIL: Omicron Variant flops in fear-based propaganda “theaters” of Big Media, Big Pharma and the Vaccine Industrial Complex
Be very afraid of Covid now that the plandemic is over, because fake news and the Vaccine Industrial Complex did not wreck quite as many lives as they had planned to before the “curve” got flattened out by truth news. A massive new wave of fearmongering is in full effect in Australia to get more parents to get their kids jabbed with the deadliest injections ever created, and not to forget about pregnant mothers too. It’s the depopulation, sick care complex M.O. still in full effect.
1. Fear-Mongering Flop: The latest COVID scare campaign, centered on the new NB.1.8.1 subvariant, resembles a failing Marvel franchise—endless installments with diminishing returns, as public indifference grows despite media hype.
2. Contradictory Data: While headlines warn of surging cases and hospitalizations, actual data (e.g., WA’s near-zero ICU admissions) undermines the narrative. Context is ignored to sustain the "crisis."
3. Failed Vaccine Push: Authorities aggressively push boosters, yet only 6.6% of adults bothered in the last six months—despite vaccines being "free" (tax-funded). Even health officials admit current shots offer limited protection against fast-mutating variants.
4. Admitted Futility: Experts concede that vaccinating against rapidly evolving coronaviruses is inherently flawed, echoing long-ignored warnings about immune imprinting, variant-driven escape, and the near-impossibility of effective mucosal virus vaccines.
Australia's latest COVID subvariant stirs concerns, but public skepticism grows amid low booster uptake
A new Omicron subvariant, dubbed NB.1.8.1, is spreading across Australia, accounting for up to 40% of cases in Victoria and driving warnings from health officials. Despite the alarms, public interest wanes as booster uptake remains staggeringly low—only 6.6% of adults have received a COVID vaccine in the past six months.
Health Minister Mark Butler has urged Australians to “have a serious think” about boosters, but experts acknowledge limitations in fighting ever-mutating viruses. Meanwhile, skepticism grows as past predictions of vaccine efficacy clash with contemporary realities.
Australian authorities cite the NB.1.8.1 subvariant as highly transmissible, with infections rising in Western Australia, New South Wales, and Queensland. ABC reports that it now dominates case counts in Victoria, while hospitalizations—though stable—spark renewed calls for booster shots.
Yet public skepticism lingers. Intensive care admissions in Western Australia remain low, with no COVID-related ICU cases reported for months, according to WA Health. Critics argue that fear-driven narratives clash with data.
Industry experts acknowledge the challenge. “The virus gradually evolves so that some of its proteins are a little bit different… making it evade our antibodies better,” one specialist told media, referencing mutations in the spike protein.
Despite government appeals, Australia’s booster campaign struggles. Current guidelines recommend shots only for select groups: adults over 75 (every six months) and those aged 65–74 or severely immunocompromised (annually). For others, boosters are optional—a shift from early pandemic urgency.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
COVID CLOT SHOTS can cause deadly SWELLING of the BRAIN according to doctor’s testimony in medical journal JAMA Neurology
Growing concerns over severe neurological reactions to Covid-19 vaccines have intensified following reports of life-threatening brain inflammation linked to AstraZeneca’s jab. In France, a previously healthy 60-year-old man developed meningoencephalitis — a dangerous swelling of the brain and spinal cord — just four weeks after receiving his first dose, leaving him with lasting neurological damage despite intensive treatment.
His case, detailed in JAMA Neurology, adds to mounting evidence of rare but devastating complications, including rare blood clots and post-vaccine encephalitis, that have prompted legal action, regulatory restrictions, and calls for better compensation for victims. While officials maintain that the vaccine’s benefits outweigh risks, emerging reports of “post-vaccination syndrome” and unresolved injuries continue to fuel global debate over vaccine safety.
• Rare but severe reactions linked to AstraZeneca vaccine – The MHRA confirmed 30 cases of rare blood clots tied to the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, with experts warning the actual number may be higher. Some patients, like a UK man who lost sensation in his legs, suffered severe neurological damage after inoculation, while others died or were left permanently disabled.
• Post-vaccine brain inflammation case study – A 60-year-old French man developed life-threatening meningoencephalitis (brain and spinal cord swelling) four weeks after receiving AstraZeneca’s vaccine. Doctors diagnosed him with post-vaccinal encephalitis, likely caused by an immune overreaction, requiring six months of immunosuppressant drugs. While he mostly recovered, lingering attention deficits persisted three years later.
• AstraZeneca restrictions and compensation challenges – Due to rare clotting risks (VITT/TSS), European nations restricted the vaccine in 2021, with the UK limiting it to older adults. At least 81 Brits died from complications, and 293 vaccine injury claims were approved—but strict criteria (e.g., 60% disability) block many from receiving £120,000 compensation.
• Emerging concerns over post-vaccination syndromes – Beyond AstraZeneca, mRNA vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna) are linked to "post-vaccination syndrome," with symptoms like brain fog, tinnitus, and immune abnormalities. Researchers also warn of reactivated Epstein-Barr virus in some cases, though findings remain preliminary.
Rare but deadly brain swelling linked to AstraZeneca COVID Vaccine in new case study
A 60-year-old man’s near-fatal reaction renews scrutiny on vaccine risks and long-term monitoring. A healthy 60-year-old man in France developed life-threatening brain inflammation just weeks after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, according to a case study published in JAMA Neurology. Four weeks post-vaccination, the unnamed patient experienced sudden walking difficulties and mental confusion, prompting doctors to diagnose meningoencephalitis—a dangerous swelling of the brain and spinal cord.
Despite no evidence of infections or underlying diseases, medical experts concluded his immune system overreacted to the vaccine, leading to a rare but severe neurological complication. His case, alongside mounting reports of similar incidents, raises urgent questions about vaccine safety mechanisms and long-term patient monitoring.
The patient initially improved after emergency treatment but relapsed three months later, requiring six months of immunosuppressive drugs to control the inflammation. Though he nearly recovered after three years, lingering attention deficits remained. Doctors emphasized the need for "prompt diagnosis and aggressive treatment" in such cases, given the unpredictability of post-vaccine neurological reactions.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Pfizer, Moderna forced to update COVID-19 vaccine labels after FDA confirms heart inflammation risk highest in teenage boys
In a long-overdue move to protect public health, federal regulators this week finally forced Big Pharma giants Pfizer and Moderna to update their COVID-19 vaccine labels with stronger warnings about life-threatening heart inflammation, particularly in young males. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced on June 25 that the revised labels must now explicitly state that myocarditis and pericarditis occur "most commonly in males 12 years through 24 years of age," with alarming rates of 27 cases per million doses in this vulnerable group. While the FDA deserves some credit for this belated transparency, the question remains: Why did it take years of mounting evidence and irreversible harm to countless young people before regulators acted?
New warnings confirm long-suspected risks
The updated labels reflect disturbing 2024 FDA research showing that some patients suffered heart scarring months after vaccination, raising serious concerns about permanent cardiac damage. Although federal officials claim most cases resolve with treatment, the long-term consequences remain unknown, with manufacturers still conducting studies. The revised warnings also reveal that the estimated incidence of myocarditis or pericarditis within seven days of vaccination is eight cases per million doses in people ages 6 months through 64 but skyrockets to 27 cases per million in males ages 12 to 24.
Richard Forshee, acting director of the FDA’s Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, pointed to newer research, including a 2024 FDA study that found persistent heart abnormalities in myocarditis patients months after vaccination. "In most people who have had myocarditis or pericarditis after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, symptoms have gone away a few days after receiving treatment," the labels state. Yet they also admit: "It is not known if these heart MRI findings might predict long-term heart effects."
A pattern of delayed accountability
This isn’t the first time regulators have dragged their feet. The FDA first added myocarditis warnings in June 2021, which was several months after officials first learned of cases, yet they continued pushing the shots for children and young adults. Even now, the CDC’s outdated webpage (last updated October 2023) still claims "COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older," despite mounting evidence that healthy young people face disproportionate risks.
Meanwhile, the Biden administration’s relentless vaccine mandates coerced millions into taking these experimental shots under the false pretense of absolute safety. How many parents, had they known the true risks, would have refused to subject their teenage sons to potential lifelong heart damage?
The fight for medical transparency isn’t over
While the FDA’s label update is a step toward accountability, it’s a small one. The agency still refuses to acknowledge the full scope of vaccine injuries, and Pfizer and Moderna—both of which ignored media inquiries—have yet to issue any public statements addressing these risks. Worse, the CDC continues to push COVID-19 shots for all age groups, ignoring data showing that myocarditis rates in young males far exceed the background rate.
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻